The document discusses the Lightning Network as a proposed solution to Bitcoin's rising transaction fees and clogged network. However, it notes that Lightning Network does not completely solve the fee problem and that nodes remaining continuously online makes them susceptible to hacking if private keys are compromised. It also discusses how Bitcoin price fluctuations could impact its viability for daily transactions using payment channels.
The document discusses the Lightning Network as a proposed solution to Bitcoin's rising transaction fees and clogged network. However, it notes that Lightning Network does not completely solve the fee problem and that nodes remaining continuously online makes them susceptible to hacking if private keys are compromised. It also discusses how Bitcoin price fluctuations could impact its viability for daily transactions using payment channels.
The document discusses the Lightning Network as a proposed solution to Bitcoin's rising transaction fees and clogged network. However, it notes that Lightning Network does not completely solve the fee problem and that nodes remaining continuously online makes them susceptible to hacking if private keys are compromised. It also discusses how Bitcoin price fluctuations could impact its viability for daily transactions using payment channels.
Ans-1 What is needed is an electronic payment system based on
cryptographic proof instead of trust, allowing any two willing parties
to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted third party. Transactions that are computationally impractical to reverse would protect sellers from fraud, and routine escrow mechanisms could easily be implemented to protect buyers The first challenge is that of Ownership. While ownership of fiat currency (rupees, dollars) is decided by physical possession or bank account entry, that of digital currency is determined by the validation of possession of spending credentials in digital form. The second challenge is to provide a single source of truth regarding the amount of virtual currency owned by an entity.
Ans-2 It Does Not Completely Solve Bitcoin’s Transaction Fee
Problem Lightning Network is often touted as a solution to the problem of bitcoin’s rising transaction fees. Its proponents claim that transaction fees, which is one of the direct consequences of Bitcoin’s clogged network, will come down after the technology takes transactions off the main blockchain
Remaining Online at All Times Makes Nodes Susceptible
Nodes on Bitcoin’s lightning network are required to be online at all times in order to send and receive payments. Since the parties involved in the transaction must be online and they use their private keys to sign in, it's possible that the coins could be stolen if the computer storing the private keys was compromised
Bitcoin's Price Fluctuations
The advent of Lightning Network is also supposed to herald Bitcoin’s viability as a medium for daily transactions. Customers are able to open payment channels with businesses or people that they transact with frequently. For example, they can open payment channels with their landlord or favorite e-commerce store and transact using bitcoins.
Ans-3 Forthe purposes of this article, we will mainly look to Bitcoin's
blockchain when discussing aspects of blockchain architecture in general. However, the architectural components of transactions, blocks, mining, and consensus can be generalized and implemented in many different ways, leading to various possible blockchain projects. These projects usually involve creating other cryptocurrencies (or alt-coins), but the diTransactions contain one- or-more inputs and one-or-more outputs. An input is a reference to an output from a previous transaction. An output specifies an amount and address . An input always references a previous transaction's output. This continual pointer of inputs to previous transactions outputs allows for an uninterrupted, verifiable stream of value (represented by the bitcoin currency) amongst addresses versity in blockchain-related project ideas is growing quickly. Ans-4
In the present work, we analyze the distribution of Bitcoin across
entities of different sizes, taking into consideration addresses that belong to exchanges and miners as well. We aim to shine more light on the true underlying distribution of BTC across network participants, and show that Bitcoin ownership is much less concentrated than often reported – and has in fact seen a dispersion over the years. In addition, we demonstrate that over the course of the past year the BTC supply held by whale entities has considerably increased, suggesting an inflow of institutional investors.
Ans -5 Blockchain network is by its very nature decentralized.
Because of this, Bitcoin and other forms of cryptocurrencies don’t need a centralized or third-party authority like a bank or financial institution to preside over the network and its transactions. Instead, everyone using the blockchain network monitors everyone else and verifies transactions. Note that, under this system, the actors in the blockchain network don’t need to know each other’s identities in real life. Furthermore, cryptographic protocols ensure the privacy of personal information and that chain verification records are legitimate. These cryptographic protocols are so complex that it would take even the most advanced supercomputers many centuries to break them by force. Because of this, Bitcoin’s network is very resilient to hacking attacks. Ultimately, it would be very difficult to compromise or cheat on the Bitcoin blockchain network because of its inherently decentralized, encrypted structure.
Ans-6 It was coming towards the end of February, 2014. Uncertainty
culminated over a new found exuberance towards a digital currency – known as Bitcoins – when Mt. Gox, the biggest Bitcoin Exchange in Japan collapsed. Leaked corporate documents pointed the cause of collapse to hackers, who caused some hundreds of thousands of Bitcoins to evaporate from the exchange. Fears of people who doubted Bitcoins’ legitimacy and security had been confirmed: it was no other than another form of technological innovation susceptible to hackers’ maleficence. The CEO of Mt. Gox, Mark Karpeles, said at the press conference thereafter while announcing Mt. Gox’s bankruptcy that “we had weaknesses in our system, and our Bitcoins vanished. We’ve caused trouble and inconvenience to many people, and I feel deeply sorry for what has happened.”