Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mineralisation of Developmentally
Hypomineralised Human Enamel in vitro
F.A. Crombie N.J. Cochrane D.J. Manton J.E.A. Palamara E.C. Reynolds
Melbourne Dental School, Oral Health Co-operative Research Centre, The University of Melbourne,
Parkville, Vict., Australia
60
50
Control lines
40
Test lines
30
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Distance (μm)
80
50
40
30
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Distance (μm)
Fig. 1. Polarised light images of MIH lesions after exposure to trol (white) sides for mineral content analysis, and corresponding
CPP-ACFP solutions in vitro viewed in water (refractive index graph with arrows indicating the area of altered mineral content
1.33), demonstrating the test area (black bracket) where the poros- used to calculate %R and absolute changes (white) and the conver-
ity of much of the lesion has reduced to ^5%, and the control area gence of the mineral content profiles demonstrating equivalence
(white bracket) where porosity exceeds 5%. Transverse microra- of test and control sides (black). The top row represents a polished
diograph images of MIH lesions after exposure to CPP-ACFP so- lesion without NaOCl pre-treatment, the bottom row represents
lutions in vitro, with lines marking scans of test (black) and con- a polished lesion with NaOCl pre-treatment.
were observed in the NaOCl group. The mineral content layer that can restrict access to deeper tissue layers for in-
of the test side was significantly higher than that of the ward diffusion of ions or materials [Larsen and Pearce,
control side for all lesions (p ! 0.001). 1992; Meyer-Lueckel et al., 2007; Cochrane et al., 2012].
As the physical removal of the surface layer may be too
destructive for clinical application minimally invasive al-
Discussion ternatives for altering this layer need to be explored or
earliest possible intervention advocated when feasible be-
The effective management of MIH-affected teeth is an fore the layer has formed. Additionally, protein in MIH is
ongoing issue for the majority of clinicians and many of likely to be a problem, and so a deproteination treatment
the published guidelines and recommendations for treat- was trialled, which appeared to show some additional
ment include the application of remineralising agents benefit. This was despite the teeth having undergone for-
such as high concentration fluorides and CPP-ACP/CPP- malin fixation, during which protein cross-linking is ex-
ACFP [William et al., 2006; Crombie et al., 2008]. The pected which is likely to reduce the subsequent effective-
present study establishes proof-of-concept evidence that ness of deproteination agents such as NaOCl. The use of
developmentally hypomineralised enamel can be im- alternative disinfection/sterilisation procedures that do
proved both in terms of increasing the mineral content not cross-link proteins may even lead to a better outcome.
and reducing the porosity of the lesion using gold stan- On the other hand the lesions in this group had lower
dard techniques. mineral content and enamel permeability may be a con-
In this study the lesion surface layer was physically re- founding factor in facilitating improved mineral uptake.
moved as preliminary work found lesions failed to re- The depth to which the effects of deproteination agents
spond to mineralisation treatments when it was present. extend should also be examined as they may prove to be
This may be similar to the natural carious lesion surface limited to the surface.
All 923 (372) ⌬Zc 1,592 1,503 1,576 1,619 1,592 1,649 11,404
⌬Zc – ⌬Zt 504 402 333 268 149 132 1,828
%R 35.8 25.8 21.9 15.5 13.5 9.0 17.7
CPP-ACFP was chosen as the mineralisation agent as mineral deposited: agents that encourage deposition of
this has been shown in previous studies to promote high the more stable fluoridated apatites would be most ad-
levels of mineral return. In a similar in vitro study Mayne vantageous in increasing resistance to future acid disso-
et al. [2011] found 43% mineral return to artificial carious lution, but considering the high carbonate content of
lesions that were approximately 400 m deep after a 30- MIH-affected enamel covering the existing crystals even
day exposure. The degree of mineral uptake in the cur- with hydroxyapatite is likely to be beneficial. The ob-
rent study did not reach these levels, however, natural served reduction in porosity may explain the anecdotal
carious lesions are less amenable to repair than artificial improvement in sensitivity after use of commercially
carious lesions and developmental hypomineralisations available crèmes with CPP-ACP, by decreasing thermal/
may be even more difficult to mineralise. While improv- tactile stimulation as well as reducing pathways for bacte-
ing the quantity of mineral is important, so is the type of rial ingress and associated pulpal inflammatory changes
References
Angmar B, Carlstrom D, Glas JE: Studies on the bules beneath apparently intact but hypo- enamel during orthodontic adhesive remov-
ultrastructure of dental enamel. IV. The min- mineralized enamel in molar teeth with mo- al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;
eralization of normal human enamel. J Ul- lar incisor hypomineralization. Int J Paedi- 139:e543–e551.
trastruct Res 1963;8:12–23. atr Dent 2008;18:333–340. Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Kielbassa AM: Surface
Baroni C, Marchionni S: MIH supplementation Farah RA, Monk BC, Swain MV, Drummond layer erosion of natural caries lesions with
strategies: prospective clinical and labora- BK: Protein content of molar-incisor hypo- phosphoric and hydrochloric acid gels in
tory trial. J Dent Res 2011;90:371–376. mineralisation enamel. J Dent 2010; 38: 591– preparation for resin infiltration. Caries Res
Cochrane NJ, Anderson P, Davis GR, Adams 596. 2007;41:223–230.
GG, Stacey MA, Reynolds EC: An X-ray mi- Larsen MJ, Fejerskov O: Chemical and structur- Robinson C, Hallsworth AS, Shore RC, Kirkham
crotomographic study of natural white-spot al challenges in remineralization of dental J: Effect of surface zone deproteinisation on
enamel lesions. J Dent Res 2012;91:185–191. enamel lesions. Scand J Dent Res 1989; 97: the access of mineral ions into subsurface
Cochrane NJ, Saranathan S, Cai F, Cross KJ, 285–296. carious lesions of human enamel. Caries Res
Reynolds EC: Enamel subsurface lesion rem- Larsen MJ, Pearce EI: Some notes on the diffu- 1990;24:226–230.
ineralisation with casein phosphopeptide sion of acidic and alkaline agents into natu- Robinson C, Shore RC, Bonass WA, Brookes SJ,
stabilised solutions of calcium, phosphate ral human caries lesions in vitro. Arch Oral Boteva E, Kirkham J: Identification of human
and fluoride. Caries Res 2008;42:88–97. Biol 1992; 37:411–416. serum albumin in human caries lesions of
Crombie F: An Investigation into Developmen- Leppaniemi A, Lukinmaa PL, Alaluusua S: Non- enamel: the role of putative inhibitors of re-
tally Hypomineralised Enamel in First Per- fluoride hypomineralizations in the perma- mineralisation. Caries Res 1998;32:193–199.
manent Molar Teeth; PhD thesis Melbourne nent first molars and their impact on the ten Cate JM, Arends J: Remineralization of arti-
Dental School, University of Melbourne, treatment need. Caries Res 2001;35:36–40. ficial enamel lesions in vitro. Caries Res
2011. Mangum JE, Crombie FA, Kilpatrick N, Manton 1978;12:213–222.
Crombie FA, Manton DJ, Weerheijm KL, Kilpat- DJ, Hubbard MJ: Surface integrity governs Weerheijm KL, Jalevik B, Alaluusua S: Molar-
rick NM: Molar incisor hypomineralization: the proteome of hypomineralized enamel. J incisor hypomineralisation. Caries Res 2001;
a survey of members of the Australian and Dent Res 2010;89:1160–1165. 35:390–391.
New Zealand Society of Paediatric Dentistry. Mayne RJ, Cochrane NJ, Cai F, Woods MG, William V, Messer LB, Burrow MF: Molar inci-
Aust Dent J 2008;53:160–166. Reynolds EC: In-vitro study of the effect of sor hypomineralization: review and recom-
Fagrell TG, Lingstrom P, Olsson S, Steiniger F, casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium mendations for clinical management. Pedi-
Noren JG: Bacterial invasion of dentinal tu- fluoride phosphate on iatrogenic damage to atr Dent 2006;28:224–232.