Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22 . ASSESSMENT 2
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD
FLYNN SCHRANTZ
N10466606
ELIZABETH MOSS
N10764356
ANNABELLE HAUFF
N10773975
MICHAEL LIBBY
N10534768
GROUP 22
SECTION 3
ANNABELLE HAUFF. N10773975
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
DESIGN CRITERIA 20.08.21
MUST
MUST SHOULD NOT F
• Design a functionally, aesthetically, and • The torch should be designed to suit varied lighting conditions
S
• Torch must not have the
symbolically appropriate torch.
• Different user abilities should be accounted for, particularly strength and potential to burn users through
• Must be designed to suit all weather balance exposed flame, material heat
conditions that the LETR may come transfer, and dripping fuel
• Should consider a more efficient fuel usage or alternative fuel options to
across • The product must not use
the current kerosene torch, which expends fuel in 40 minutes
• Must be easy and safe to ignite complex manufacturing
• Should look at alternatives to a burning flame and/or the protection of
procedures E
• The torch must be able to ignite the the flame should be considered for use during running
cauldron • The torch should be safe and efficient to refuel without a need for the
• The torches fuel must not be M
hard to source nor transport as
• Torch must be design for usable and torch to cool before refuelling
to make the torch usable
safe operation both outdoors and • Torch will be stored for long periods of time and transported to various
indoors. events, often by air, so the torch should be able to be emptied and safely
• The Torch much minimize fumes and stored
smoke that may affect the users and • The availability of the fuel both in Australian and overseas destinations
people nearby, and the potential to should also be considered if it is a prohibited substance on aeroplanes A
trigger fire alarms
• Must account for ergonomics of
• Storage and display options when not in use should be considered H
handgrip (size, angle, grip etc), torch • Should reflect inclusion and empowerment of people with intellectual
must accommodate 2 users at a time disabilities
for safety • Should represent both the LETR and Special Olympics through the design
• Design must be simple to manufacture, of the torch.
assemble, and disassemble • Design should be able to be manufactured by small‐scale manufacturing
• The torch must be easy to hygienically • The product should have a sustainable, life cycle, materials, product parts
M
clean and any consumables L
• Must be easily maintained • The materials and mechanisms of the torch should be physically durable,
and the aesthetics should be emotionally and physically durable.
DESIGN OF TORCH 1
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
PRIOR RESEARCH/ WORK
A
H
2
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
RESEARCH 02.08.21
GRIP STRENGTH OF PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES
With regard to their motor characteristics, the studies carried out among the ID population reveal that these individuals show lower
levels of physical activity
A
H
This lower performance spans all the physical qualities: stamina, strength, flexibility, body composition, balance, speed and coordination. Among them,
strength is particularly important because it represents the health function of muscles, bones, nerves and joints. Specifically, hand grip strength and
maximum isometric force that can be generated by the hand and forearm muscles is related to the ability to perform everyday tasks and to the individual’s
nutritional status
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320415118_Hand_grip_strength_in_adult
s_with_intellectual_disabilities
GRIP STRENGTH 3
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
RESEARCH 02.08.21
GRIP STRENGTH OF PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES
This study is the first to present grip strength results of a large
sample of people with ID from20–90 years of age.
A
H
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27920921
9_Reference_Values_of_Grip_Strength_Measured_wi
th_a_Jamar_Dynamometer_in_1526_Adults_with_Int
ellectual_Disabilities_and_Compared_to_Adults_with
out_Intellectual_Disability
GRIP STRENGTH 4
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
RESEARCH 02.08.21
A
H
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279209219_Reference_Values
_of_Grip_Strength_Measured_with_a_Jamar_Dynamometer_in_1526_Ad
ults_with_Intellectual_Disabilities_and_Compared_to_Adults_without_In
tellectual_Disability
GRIP STRENGTH 5
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
RESEARCH 02.08.21
In the comparison with the data for the general population, this study demonstrates that people with intellectual
disabilities have very low levels of grip strength during their entire life. Even at an age of 20–30 years, their grip strength is
as low as for 75‐year‐olds of the general population, which is the age of a nursing home population. There is only a slight
decline across the ages, not nearly as much as in the general population. This low level of grip strength probably
represents the bare minimum of grip strength necessary to perform basic daily activities.
Limitations of this study are the lack of information on the presence of Down syndrome, which has been demonstrated to
negatively influence grip strength [34]. Since the prevalence of Down syndrome is only around 15% of the total population
of people with ID, this influences considered to be minor. The level of intellectual disability does seem to influence grip
strength results
A
H
the grip strength for the left and the right hand, not taking differences in handedness into account. In the general
population, most people are right‐handed, and often this is also the strongest hand. In people with intellectual
disabilities, not only is a larger percentage left‐handed or has no preference for either the right or left hand, but also this
does not necessarily result in this hand being the strongest hand
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279209219_Reference_Values_of_Grip_Strength_Measu
red_with_a_Jamar_Dynamometer_in_1526_Adults_with_Intellectual_Disabilities_and_Compared_t
o_Adults_without_Intellectual_Disability
GRIP STRENGTH 6
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
RESEARCH 10.08.21
Single colour localized
Localized mark (colour) mark
LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN COLOURS
Colours are usually supported by
white for upkeep of the brands
visual identity A
H
LETR BADGE
https://letr.org/resources/Resource‐Library/LETR_Brand‐Identity‐
Guidelines_1.1.pdf
*Able to fit on torch*
LETR BRANDING 7
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
RESEARCH 11.08.21
Bright yellow colour
COOKTOWN ORCHID GOLDEN WATTLE
Queensland state
flower
Australia’s flower
Pink colour
A
H
Unique shape
Iconic shape
Well known flower
AUSTRALIAN FLORA 8
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
IDEATION 11.08.21
A
H
TORCH HANDLE SHAPES 9
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEK 6
A
H
10
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 04/09
DESIGNS CHOSEN FOR FURTHER DEVLEOPMENT
DESIGN A (FLYNN’S)
Main distinguishable features:
White body
Main distinguishable features: Cone shaped flame bowl
Red handle grip that references the special Two handle grips separated
Olympics logo Geometric shape
White body colour Modern
Two main bodies Special Olympics logo aesthetics in the
Rounded shape middle
Police check holes on the flame cone
Wattle detailing at base A
H
DESIGN B (ELIZABETH’S)
ORGINAL CHOSEN DESIGNS 11
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 04/09
ISSUES IDENTIFIED
A
H
ORGINAL CHOSEN DESIGNS 12
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEKLY FEEDBACK
WEEK 6
TUTOR FEEDBACK
Stainless steel as a material is very heavy and is advised against
How would the rubber handle on concept A withstand the heat from the flame?
ACTIONS:
Research other materials such as fiber glass and aluminum.
A
Research into other materials for the grip, specifically heat resistant
H
TUTOR FEEDBACK WEEK 6 13
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEK 7
A
H
14
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
TORCH SPECS 05/09
A
H
COMPONENT MEASUREMENTS 15
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
TORCH SPECS 05/09
A
H
COMPONENT MEASUREMENTS 16
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
REQUIREMENTS 05/09
A
H
TORCH REQUIREMENTS 17
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 05/09
CONCEPT SKETCHING FOR DESIGN A
A
H
DESIGN A ITERATIONS 18
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 05/09
A
H
DESIGN A ITERATIONS 19
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 05/09
A
H
DESIGN A ITERATIONS 20
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 05/09
A
H
DESIGN A ITERATIONS 21
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 05/09
A
H
DESIGN A ITERATIONS 22
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 05/09
A
H
DESIGN A ITERATIONS 23
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 05/09
CONCEPT SKETCHING FOR DESIGN B
A
H
DESIGN B ITERATIONS 24
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 05/09
CONCEPT SKETCHING FOR DESIGN B
A
H
DESIGN B ITERATIONS 25
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 05/09
CONCEPT SKETCHING FOR DESIGN B
A
H
DESIGN B ITERATIONS 26
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 05/09
CONCEPT SKETCHING FOR DESIGN B
A
H
DESIGN B ITERATIONS 27
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
MODEL MAKING 06/09
LOW FIDELITY PAPER AND FOAM MODEL
A
With ideation sketches in The starting models were made Due to the issue of Flynn’s
mind, we began with out of card and foam, as they original model having a H
experimenting with models to were easily moulded materials. smaller handle, this became
assist in the final design idea So these were used to create the main focus design change
low‐fidelity models. necessary
DESIGN A 28
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
MODEL MAKING 06/09
LOW FIDELITY PAPER AND FOAM MODEL
A
The main body of the
During the prototyping phase, A handed around internal
prototyped design was made of
H
it was important to consider weight structure was handed
the length of the handle in around so we could get an thick paper, which was formed
consideration to how it would idea of how heavy the into a cone to hide the internals.
fit two hands, as well as a internals alone were. This was
third for a hand over. important as our assessment
1 feedback noted on how the
torch could be top heavy. So it
was important to try to
combat this in our design.
DESIGN A 29
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
MODEL MAKING 06/09
LOW FIDELITY PAPER AND FOAM MODEL
A
For assessment 1, group We ensured that the handle Detailing for the prototype
member Flynn, made a small was long enough to allow for was made utilising workshop H
scale 3D model of the original the space of 3 hands. tools. In this instance the
design. This was used as a Special Olympics logo design
reference to reference the for the torch was foam cut to
newly designed shape in shape using the hot wire
correlation with the original. cutter.
This was to ensure it wasn’t
too different from the chosen
design.
DESIGN A 30
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
MODEL MAKING 06/09
LOW FIDELITY PAPER AND FOAM MODEL
A
The foam detailing was attached Due to the internals naturally Other trials such as adding H
being top heavy, a base counter handles to the side of the design
to the paper model using hot
weight in the form of a pommel were tried. This was an addition
glue. Which allowed for us to
was added to the design. This that was deemed unnecessary in
gain an understanding of what
also allowed for us to see how it terms of the design.
the final would look like.
would look aesthetic wise.
DESIGN A 31
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
MODEL MAKING 06/09
LOW FIDELITY PAPER AND FOAM MODEL
A
More trialling with the handles
The counter weight also ruined We tried having three and four H
the aesthetic, so that was also hands on the design, however
was done in different positions.
removed. we found that due to the cone
But it was decided that they
shaped handle that tapered to
ruined the aesthetics.
the bottom, it was difficult for
the top hand and bottom hand
to hold. Also the handle also
looked too cramped.
DESIGN A 32
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
MODEL MAKING 06/09
LOW FIDELITY PAPER AND FOAM MODEL
A
Due to the tapering size, it was The divot was taped into the This design change and iteration H
decided that a divot in the design so the model could be made the handle significantly
handle was needed to allow for tested again. more easy to hold, especially for
ergonomics for the users. This hands on the smaller side.
made the handle easier to hold
due to the decrease in width
needed to wrap a hand around.
DESIGN A 33
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
MODEL MAKING 06/09
LOW FIDELITY PAPER AND FOAM MODEL
A
H
The torch model was used in This was demonstrated using
relation to the cauldron to myself as the shortest member
demonstrate how it would be lit to see if it was easily lit from my
during the torch run. height. This was because it was
evident people with taller
genetics would be able to reach
the cauldron with ease. It was
found that although I could
reach, it was still found to be
difficult.
DESIGN A 34
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
MODEL MAKING 06/09
LOW FIDELITY PAPER AND FOAM MODEL
A
This model was made entirely
H
The torch was made to exact
In terms if model making for out of paper, and was formed dimensions to the original
design b, we decided we by making different cylinder design.
would make a model for the and cone shapes and fusing
original design presented. them together with masking
This was because feedback tape.
received was that they liked
the shape, but the aesthetics
were not so liked.
DESIGN B 35
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
MODEL MAKING 06/09
LOW FIDELITY PAPER AND FOAM MODEL
A
H
After creating the model, we Although the handles were
The grips for the torch were practical, they distracted and
found to be a little small. The tested adding handles to the
side so the torch could be ruined the overall appeal of
photo presents mt hand the sleekly designed torch.
which is quite small compared shorter in size as the handles
with others, and it shown to could be placed next to each
fit perfectly which poses a other rather than on top of
problem for hands on the each other.
bigger end of the scale.
DESIGN B 36
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
MODEL MAKING 06/09
LOW FIDELITY PAPER AND FOAM MODEL
A
This torch design was also
H
Without the handles, two hands
experimented with the cauldron.
could fit comfortably on the
It was found that the long design
designated areas. However
functioned quite well with the
through this process we
lighting of the cauldron as it
discovered that there is no real
allowed for the user to not be
place for a third hand to grab for
too close to the flame during the
pass over which allowed for an
process.
opportunity to make the middle
collar bigger to allow for this.
DESIGN B 37
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
MODEL MAKING 06/09
DEMONSTRATION OF BOTH MODELS
When the models are compared, it is visually evident that
design B is significantly larger than design B.
It is also seen that design b presents a much more
ergonomic design which is favourable in terms of the
project.
Design Comparison PROS and CONS
Design A Design B
PROS CONS PROS CONS A
• Incorporates the
Special Olympics
• Harder to fit
componentry in
• Sleek design
• Can fit 2‐3 hands
• Really long/ big
• Lacks details as of
H
into the physical • Thick handle comfortably yet
design • Odd shape • Counterweight • Top heavy
• Easily fits
componentry
MODEL COMPARISON 38
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEKLY FEEDBACK
WEEK 7
TUTOR FEEDBACK
Yellow foam is not appealing to use for the torch model
ACTIONS:
Don’t use yellow foam for the final
A
Try other methods of prototyping
H
TUTOR FEEDBACK WEEK 7 39
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEK 8
A
H
40
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 13/09
FINAL CONCEPT A
A
H
DESIGN A FINAL ITERATION 41
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 13/09
FINAL CONCEPT A
A
H
DESIGN A FINAL ITERATION DIMENTIONS 42
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CAD 13/09
FINAL CONCEPT A CAD PROCESS
A
H
DESIGN A FINAL CAD MODEL 43
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CAD 13/09
FINAL CONCEPT A CAD PROCESS
DESIGN A FINAL CAD MODEL 44
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
FOAM MODEL 13/09
FINAL CONCEPT A
A
H
Before commencement of the The dimensions were drawn The rough edges were then
second model of concept A, onto a block of foam and the sanded down to make the
we were sure to plan out hot wire cutter accessible at rounded shape we wanted.
what it would look like using uni was used to cut out the
CAD and sketches. This basic shape.
allowed for easier model
making rather than the first
attempt where it was made
without a reference.
CONCEPT A 45
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
FOAM MODEL 13/09
FINAL CONCEPT A
A
H
We tested adding the arms from After all the details were
Once the basic shape was
the special Olympics logo. They added, it was tested by being
created, we experimented
were attached using double held, adding two hands to
with adding detailing and
sided tape and were made out make sure they ergonomically
aesthetics.
of card. fit.
Although much different to the
previous model, it was found
to be a better shape than the
previous.
CONCEPT A 46
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
FOAM MODEL 13/09
FINAL CONCEPT A
A
Comparing to the previous Paint pens were used to colour H
torch, it definitely improved in in the detailing to make the
overall aesthetics and shape. model more to the aesthetic
However there was the desired. We stuck to using the
concern as to how the inner original torches colours as that
components would fit as the was a defining feature in why
dimensions of those kept the design was chosen.
changing and were
unspecified.
CONCEPT A 47
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
ASSEMBLY 14/09
FINAL CONCEPT A
A
H
MANUFACTURE METHOD 48
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
ASSEMBLY 14/09
FINAL CONCEPT A
A
H
MANUFACTURE METHOD 49
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
ASSEMBLY 14/09
FINAL CONCEPT A
A
H
MANUFACTURE METHOD 50
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 14/09
CONCEPT B
Due to feedback, it was found that a circular top was too boring, so new top designs were iterated. From these sketches, it
was decided that a triangular top due to uniqueness would be chosen.
A
H
DESIGN B ITERATIONS 51
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 14/09
FINAL CONCEPT B
A
H
DESIGN B FINAL ITERATION 52
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 14/09
FINAL CONCEPT B
120
340
120
20 A
50 H
120
30
40
DESIGN B FINAL ITERATION DIMENTIONS 53
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CAD 14/09
FINAL CONCEPT B CAD PROCESS
A
H
DESIGN B FINAL CAD MODEL 54
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CAD 14/09
FINAL CONCEPT B CAD PROCESS
A
H
DESIGN B FINAL CAD MODEL 55
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
ASSEMBLY 14/09
FINAL CONCEPT B
A
H
MANUFACTURE METHOD 56
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
FOAM MODEL 14/09
FINAL CONCEPT B
Due to the fact that both of the concept design became very
similar to each other, we thought we needed to change
something to ensure difference and uniqueness.
Through sketching and iterating, I came up with the idea to
make the top triangular shaped to make it stand out. The
ergonomics of the design remained the same in relation to grip
width and length.
Due to concept A’s model taking too long, this model had to be
made after class. Therefore, group member Michael decided
A
to model it at home. *No progress photos were taken*. This H
model was made out of a foam block that was cut and sanded
to shape.
CONCEPT B 57
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEKLY FEEDBACK
WEEK 8
TUTOR FEEDBACK
Triangle to circle isn’t possible to manufacture as a shape?
Consider where the welding will go as it needs to blend in
The powder coat finish won’t go well with the aluminum material
The designs look top heavy
ACTIONS:
Perform research to show the possibility of it being A
manufactured. H
Place weld lines close to the corners for the ability to be sanded
down to be flush with the body.
Research other types of aluminum finishes.
Make iterations to combat it being top heavy. A counterweight?
TUTOR FEEDBACK WEEK 8 58
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEK 9
DESIGN FREEZE A
H
59
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
TORCH DESIGN 24/09
DESIGN B WAS CHOSEN
A
H
NOTES FOR DESIGN:
Iterate the top bowl design (triangle to circle)
Top heavy
Where does the componentry fit into the design
How does it ignite
Any safety features?
DESIGN CHOSEN 60
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
ASSEMBLY 24/09
A
H
HOW THE PARTS CONNECT 61
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
ASSEMBLY 24/09
A
H
HOW THE COMPONENTRY FITS 62
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
ASSEMBLY 24/09
A
H
HOW THE COMPONENTRY FITS 63
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
ASSEMBLY 24/09
A
H
MANUFACTION METHOD/S 64
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
PROJECT MANAGEMENT 25/09
Project management
A Gantt chart was created to ensure that my team stays on track for completion of the project
A
H
GANTT CHART 65
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
FINAL MODEL 25/09
How the final model will be created, and materials required
It was decided within my group that the final model would be 3D printed. This was because it was the easiest to give a sufficient final finish to the model.
As well group member Flynn had a personal printer so it worked well. We decided against using foam as it was harder to create shapes that we wanted,
plus it gave a textured finish which was not desired.
The final model will also be painted to give the colours we want/ need to create a realistic aesthetic model.
Any aesthetically detailing will be represented through stickers that will be made, as it allows for endless possibilities on aesthetics.
A
H
FABRICATION 66
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEKLY FEEDBACK
WEEK 9
TUTOR FEEDBACK
Try to prove how the triangle to circle can be manufactured?
Steel is too heavy and expensive to manufacture with
Where do the parts fit?
Torch design B was chosen
ACTIONS:
Maybe consider changing shapes?
A
Research other materials and manufacturing methods to go with
Draw a diagram to show where the components slot into the design H
Further develop torch B
TUTOR FEEDBACK WEEK 9 67
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEK 10
A
H
68
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
FINAL DESIGN 11/10
DESIGN CHANGE
Accounts for the components as well as easier manufacturing
A
H
FINAL TORCH SHAPE 69
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
FINAL DESIGN 11/10
DESIGN CHANGE
A
H
FINAL TORCH DIMENTIONS 70
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
FINAL DESIGN 11/10
DESIGN CHANGE
As seen through this low fidelity cardboard model, it shows that it can easily and comfortably have 3 hands hold it at any given time.
A
H
CARDBOARD MODEL 71
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
ASSEMBLY 11/10
A
H
MANUFACTURING 72
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
STORYBOARD 11/10
A
H
SEQUENCE OF USE 73
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
COMPONENTS 11/10
A
H
DIMENTIONS OF INNER COMPONENTS 74
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
COMPONENTS 11/10
A
H
LAYOUT IN TORCH 75
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
ASSEMBLY 11/10
A
H
CONNECTIONS 76
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
FINAL TORCH 12/10
A
H
FINAL RENDER 77
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
ACCESSORIES 12/10
A
H
TRAVEL CASE IDEATION 78
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
ACCESSORIES 12/10
A
H
TRAVEL CASE IDEATION 79
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
ACCESSORIES 12/10
A
H
DISPLAY STAND IDEATION 80
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEKLY FEEDBACK
WEEK 10
TUTOR FEEDBACK
How will it be manufactured? Explain in DDR
ACTIONS:
Add in research and diagrams to show the manufacture method
A
H
TUTOR FEEDBACK WEEK 10 81
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEK 11
A
H
82
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
TRAVEL CASE 11/10
HERO IMAGES
A
H
FINAL CAD DESIGN 83
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
TRAVEL CASE 11/10
EXPOLADED VIEW AND SECTION VIEW
A
H
FINAL CAD DESIGN 84
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
TRAVEL CASE 11/10
A
H
TRAVEL CASE TECHNICAL DRAWINGS 85
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
TRAVEL CASE 11/10
A
H
TRAVEL CASE TECHNICAL DRAWINGS 86
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
TRAVEL CASE 18/10
HERO IMAGES
The detailing on the case includes the LETR logo one side and the Special Olympics logo on the other.
A
H
FINAL DESIGN AESTHETICS 87
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CAD 18/10
A
H
TRAVEL CASE 88
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CAD 18/10
A
H
Another decal was added
was the Special Olympics
decal.
TRAVEL CASE 89
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
DISPLAY STAND 19/10
HERO IMAGES
A
H
FINAL DESIGN 90
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
DISPLAY STAND 19/10
A
H
DISPLAY STAND TECHNICAL DRAWINGS 91
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CAD 19/10
DISPLAY CASE 92
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
TESTING 11/10
PAINTING METHODS FOR THE FINAL PROTOYPE TESTING
Filling and sanding
A
H
A filling putty agent (spac?) was Sanding was then done to create a smooth This is after multiple sanding
used on the 3D printed finish for the paint to apply. In this case we layers
components to fill in any gaps experimented with a lathe to really round
and joints. out the shape (of the gas canister).
PAINTING METHODS 93
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
TESTING 11/10
PAINTING METHODS FOR THE FINAL PROTOYPE TESTING
Priming and Painting
A
H
Spray paints used Primer was applied using a can labeled
‘Primer Filler’
As seen in this image, it is evident that the
printed model wasn’t filled in well enough with
the putty filler, leaving the product with a
noticeable line. The line being where the printed
model was glued together.
PAINTING METHODS 94
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
TESTING 11/10
PAINTING METHODS FOR THE FINAL PROTOYPE TESTING
Priming and Painting
A
H
One half of the tube (gas canister) was The other half was painted with a white
painted using a silver, to test for the enamel‐based spray paint. This was used
inner componentry. As seen the line is as a test for the outer body parts. It leaves
very evident even after 2 coats of paint a smooth finish which is the ideal goal and
and a primer layer. This was painted represents the finish on the aluminum
using an acrylic based spray paint. material for real manufacturing.
PAINTING METHODS 95
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
TESTING 11/10
PAINTING METHODS FOR THE FINAL PROTOYPE TESTING
Priming and Painting (clear coat, glossy finish vs non)
A
H
As seen in these two images, the left shows the cylinder without a glossy clear coat as a final layer whereas the
one on the right does. From this, I decided that the outer layer (the white) will have the glossy coat and the
inner componentry such as the solenoid and battery will just have the basic silver paint.
PAINTING METHODS 96
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEKLY FEEDBACK
WEEK 11
TUTOR FEEDBACK
Think about using bayonet connections instead of threading
The battery does not fit inside of the design, we are able to research different
batteries and show that they work
Make an allowance for a 150mm +‐20 gap between the gas cylinder and solenoid
for valves
ACTIONS:
Research bayonet screws, see the benefits and cons.
A
Research different batteries that can power the torch and prove that it works. That
it also fits into the design better than the provided one. H
Make sure the design allows for this gap.
TUTOR FEEDBACK WEEK 11 97
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEK 12
A
H
98
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
CONSTRUCTION 18/10
PIECES PUT TOGETHER
Before painting/ priming
A
H
TORCH CONSTRUCTION 99
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
PAINTING 18/10
PAINTING METHOD
A
H
POMMEL 100
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
PAINTING 18/10
PAINTING METHOD
The white pommel compared to the
primed handle. (Making sure the
pommel still has a workable thread) – it
did. A
H
POMMEL 101
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
PAINTING 22/10
PAINTING METHOD
A
H
HANDLES 102
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
PAINTING 25/10
PAINTING METHOD
A
H
TORCH CROWN 103
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
PAINTING 25/10
PAINTING METHOD
A
H
TORCH CROWN 104
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
THREADS 25/10
AFTER PAINTING
After painting, the thread got sticky and filled with paint and
didn’t work, so I sanded into the ridges to make it a smooth turn
experience.
A
H
SANDING THE THREAD 105
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
DECALS 25/10
USING THE DECAL STICKERS
The main handle stickers were added onto the body. Ruled lines
were placed to ensure the sticker was added straight.
A
H
ADDING STICKERS 106
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEKLY FEEDBACK
WEEK 12
TUTOR FEEDBACK
The report looks good, make sure to watch grammar and overall look of the report
The paint looks good
ACTIONS:
Format the document to make it look cohesive
A
H
TUTOR FEEDBACK WEEK 12 107
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEK 13
A
H
108
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
FINAL TORCH 29/10
FINAL PRODUCT MODEL
This is the finished pieces all put together, all three pieces are
threaded which makes it easy for assembly
A
H
MODEL 109
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
FINAL TORCH 01/11
FINAL PRODUCT MODEL
The torch was used in relation with the caldron to see if it would be easy to light.
A
H
MODEL WITH THE CALDRON 110
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
FINAL TORCH 01/11
FINAL PRODUCT MODEL
Grips were added to make the torch closer to the proposed product, this was done by using tennis grip tape as the main (grey) and colored electrical
tape for the designated handles.
A
H
GRIP 111
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
FINAL TORCH 01/11
FINAL PRODUCT MODEL
The decals to the torch were added in the form of stickers.
A
H
AESTHETICS 112
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEKLY FEEDBACK
WEEK 13
TUTOR FEEDBACK
Torch looks good
ACTIONS:
A
H
TUTOR FEEDBACK WEEK 13 113
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
WEEK 14
A
H
114
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECORD . GROUP 22
FINAL TORCH 04/11
FINAL PRODUCT MODEL
A
H
FINAL MODEL 115