Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis
2010
Abstract
PV panel industry is relatively under-developed in UK compared to other Europe
nations like Germany, Spain and Italy. The market is valued at £192 million in 2009 with
installing capacity of 32MW and has a share of 0.3% of all renewable energies. It is
predicted that in 2013 the installing capacity will increase to 500MW. Globally, the PV
market is dominated by First Solar and in the UK Sanyo is the biggest player.
One of the main trends that will drive the PV industry in next three years is
increasing government investment in the renewable energy industry. In 2010, the feed-in-
tariff that aims to see a rise in total energy from renewable from 2% in 2009 to 15% in
2020.
In conclusion, PV market can be seen growing rapidly in the next three years. The
market is open for new entrant to introduce their products as the industry is young but
has potential to be one of the leading renewable energy. A few recommendations are
included for new companies to adapt into the industry and use it to its full potential.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction
1.1 Scope 4
1.2 Product Details 4
1.3 Development in UK 4
1.4 Market Size and Growth 5
1.5 Key Competitors 6
6. Conclusion
6.1 Opportunities 26
6.2 Threats 27
6.3 Recommendations 27
7. Appendices 29
8. References 30
3
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Scope
The objective of this report is to give analysis on the PV panel market by considering four
main trends that are most likely to affect the PV market in the next three years. These
trends are derived from the PESTLE analysis of the market. This report also outlines the
opportunities and threats arise from these trends and some recommendation for new
entrants. The information was obtained from other primary researches like Frost & Sullivan,
Keynote and Mintel, conference reports, government reports and reliable websites.
Solar panels used to generate electricity are generally termed as photovoltaic (PV) panels.
Photovoltaic panel incorporates assembly of photo cells that convert sunlight directly into
electricity. This method of electricity generation is cost-effective, environment friendly and
requires small space.
UK is far behind other countries in Europe in when it comes to solar power market. In
Europe, Germany is in the leading with share of photovoltaic capacity of 79.9% in 2004. UK,
on the other hand, has only 0.78% of share as can be seen in table 11. It also reported that
currently Britain is lagging a decade behind other leading European countries on solar
installation2.
4
Table 1: Installed capacity of PV modules in Europe from 2003 to 20041.
The market for solar panels in UK is small and lags behind other countries like
German, South Korea and Japan. Currently, the PV market share in renewable energies is
only 0.33% and the renewable industry is dominated by wind power with 50% of share as
shown in figure 1. According to a report by Keynote, in 2008, UK consumption of renewable
energy was 5.9 million tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) compared to 3.8 million toe in 2004.
The total capacity for electric generation from PV panels has increased from 8MW in 2004
to 23MW in 20088.
Also, the Office of the Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) reports that from April
2010 to July 2010, 4429 out of 4457 PV installations are done domestically3. This clearly
shows that the market is mainly focused on domestic installations. In 2009, there was
32MW of installations in UK. The average cost for domestic PV panel installation is
£6,000/kW4. By estimation, the UK’s PV panel market is valued at £192 million in 2009.
5
Figure 1: Installed capacity of renewable electricity sources in the UK from 2004 to 20082.
Currently, the global PV panel market is dominated by First Solar with a production
of 1,100 MW in 2009 (Table 2). This is followed by Suntech and Sharp with 704 MW and 595
MW of solar PV production, respectively. Revenue of First Solar was $ 2billion in 200935
whereas Suntech and Sharp had revenues of $ 1.92 billion36 and $ 1.6 billion37. First Solar
produces thin-film modules and Suntech produces crystalline silicon modules. Sharp
manufactures both types of solar panels5. Reportedly, at the end of 2009, Sharp overtook
First Solar with revenue of $ 2.2 billion. The factor that contributed to Sharp’s success was
increased shipment of crystalline silicon panels which had higher selling price than thin-film
modules6.
6
However, in UK, Sanyo is the biggest manufacturer with 355 installations, followed
by Sharp and Kyocera with 99 and 97 installations (Table 3). The Sanyo’s panel is
Heterojunction with Intrinsic Thin layer (HIT) cell whereas Sharp and Kyocera sells crystalline
silicon products. HIT cells are regarded as most efficient, however, its price per kW is higher
than the other brands7.
7
2. TREND I
Investment by Government
2.1 Increasing financial investment
Ονε οφ µαϕορ τρενδσ τηατ ωιλλ δριϖε Πς πανελσ µαρκετ ισ τηε γροωινγ ινϖε
στµεντ βψ ΥΚ γοϖερνµεντ. Χυρρεντλψ, τηε γενερατιον οφ ελεχτριχιτψ φροµ Πς πανε
λσ ισ φαρ λεσσ τηαν οτηερ χουντριεσ ιν Ευροπε λικε Γερµανψ ανδ Ιταλψ. Ασ α λεα
δινγ νατιον, ΥΚ ωιλλ τρψ το χοµπετε το ινχρεασε ιτσ µαρκετ γλοβαλλψ.
8
ψ γοϖερνµεντ ωιλλ ινχρεασε τηε αφφορδαβιλιτψ οφ Πς πανελσ ανδ τηερεφορε χρεατ
ινγ α βιγγερ µαρκετ.
In April 2010, the UK government has introduced the feed-in-tariff scheme which will
benefit the users of renewable energies including PV panels. By implementing this tariff, the
government expects to see a rise in total energy from renewable from 2% in 2009 to 15% in
2020. Under this scheme, the users of renewable energies will receive financial benefits
such as payment for electricity produced, payment for electricity sold back to the grid and
reduction from electricity bill for using the produced energy10. Under this tariff, the users
will get a return of near £1,000 a year for a period of 25 years, allowing them to earn more
than the investment made11. Feed-in-tariff scheme can create demand for renewable
energy especially for PV panels as they are easy to install and requires only small space. As
figure 3 shows, the implementation of FIT will stimulate the market to achieve installation
capacity of 500MW in 2013.
9
Figure 3: Forecast of cumulative installed PV capacity in the UK from 2009 to 2013 with and
without FIT2.
Table 6: Number of different renewable energy modules installed under Low Carbon
Buildings Programme (LCBG)13.
11
3. TREND II
Increasing Electricity Price
Ιτ ισ ϖιταλ το τακε ιν αχχουντ οφ τηε χονϖεντιοναλ ελεχτριχιτψ σ πριχεσ αν
δ τηε εφφεχτ οφ ραω µατεριαλ χοστσ. Τηεσε φαχτορσ ωιλλ αφφεχτ τηε γροωτη οφ Πς
µαρκετ. Ασ σηοων ιν φιγυρε 5, τηε χονϖεντιοναλ ελεχτριχιτψ ισ ποωερεδ µοστλψ βψ
γασ (52 %), φολλοωεδ βψ χοαλ (23.4 %) ανδ νυχλεαρ πλαντσ (15.8 %). Αλσο, τηε συ
ππλψ οφ ραω µατεριαλσ ωιλλ αφφεχτ τηε ελεχτριχιτψ πριχεσ16.
12
Table 6: Breakdown of consumer spending on home utilities, by segment in 2004, 2006 and
200817.
13
Figure 5: Average price paid in real terms by UK power producers for coal, oil and natural gas
from 1998 to 200816.
We also need to consider the cost of production for solar panel. For most solar
panels, the material commonly used is silicon, where it constitutes 45 % of the production
cost and will directly affect the cost of PV panels. The global silicon price was valued at $
200 per kg. According to a report by Frost & Sullivan, the silicon price is expected to fall to $
65 per kg in 201220 (Figure 7). This has two different effects on the photovoltaic market. The
manufacturers will most likely have to reduce the production and forecast lower revenue.
On the bright side, the fall of silicon price will reduce production cost, attract more
customers and increase market for PV panels.
14
Figure 6: Projected global silicon prices from 2008 to 201220.
By analysing the market for raw materials, it is evident that in few years time the
conventional energy will cost higher. This will divert the attention to cheaper alternatives
like PV panels. As discussed, the declining silicon price will cause the cost for PV panel to
drop. In this case, new entrants will have to face fierce competition from the existing big
companies as they have stable finance and able to compensate the price drop.
4. TREND III
Rapid Technology Development
Many large PV panel companies are rapidly developing new technologies and
producing more advanced panels. The panels are commonly categorised according to the
semiconductors. The two main types of semiconductors used are crystalline silicon and thin-
film silicon. Crystalline silicon has a market share of 80%. The technological developments
have increased the affordability of PV panels by reducing the cost and increasing efficiency.
Table 7 summarises the common cell materials and their properties.
15
Table 8: Different types of PV panels available on the market and the properties1.
Currently, the cost of PV modules is very high and is more than ten times of the
conventional energy sources. Many large companies are investing on their research and
development area to produce cheaper PV panels as currently the panels are still considered
expensive by customers. Looking at the theory by Boston Consulting Group (BCG), it is
arguable for the UK market to be at price umbrella as very few key players are involved.
More market entrants and installations are needed before cost reduces post-shakeout4. This
encourages new entrants as the cost-competition is low.
16
Figure 7: BCG’s theory for price and cost for a new technology, by cumulative output4.
To reduce the cost of PV panels, thin-film solar cell (TFSC) are now widely
commercialised than the crystalline silicon wafers. Crystalline silicon wafers are not cost
effective as they account for 40-50 % of finished product’s cost while thin-film uses fewer
raw materials. With the improvement of technology the production cost was reduced from
$2000/Watt to $38/ watt in 1978 and to $3.8 / watt recently. Also, the cost of PV power
generation fell from $5/kWatt to $0.5/kWatt in 30 years33.
PV panels are often regarded as less efficient than other renewable energies. This
conception can decrease the market value. Although TFSC is cheaper, it has efficiency of
power conversion of 8% compared to crystalline silicon wafer which has efficiency of 17%5.
A more efficient PV panel developed is concentrated PV (CPV). These panels use high
concentration lenses to focus sunlight and uses moving frame to increase the amount of
light falling on the cell. These features increase CPV’s efficiency and reduce cost as uses less
17
PV cells. In 2009, the highest efficiency for CPV is achieved by Spectrolab and it is expected
to reach 50% in future21.
One novel technologies currently explored is the quantum dot technology. Quantum
dot-based PV cells are believed to produce seven excitons compared to one in conventional
PV panels when hit by photons of the sunlight. This can increase the efficiency of PV panel
by seven-fold. Quantum dot technology is capable of electric generation during night as it
can harvest energy using infrared and ultraviolet spectra. Currently, this technology is being
developed by Solterra Renewable Technologies and plans to commercialise it by the end of
20105.
The endless development new technologies for PV panels will definitely affect the
market by reducing the cost and increasing efficiency to attract more customers. Any new
entrant with a more effective way to harvest sunlight can dominate the market. As figure 8
shows, the panel efficiency has increased to 41.6% in the past 25 years. We can expect
fierce competition in terms of technology development in the coming years. An introduction
of a new technology wildcard will significantly reduce the electricity prices23 as shown in
figure 9. This reduction in price will appeal to new customers. However, many big
18
companies are financially stable to invest in R&D project that
that might be a disadvantage to
newcomers.
5. TREND IV
Increasing Environmental
Awareness
Another trend that will inevitably affect the PV panel market is the increasing
environmental
ental awareness amongst public, causing them to opt for renewable energies.
Media and government incentives to educate the public about the importance of switching
19
to renewable energies have a big impact on the society. Recently, UK government organised
a programme called the Big Energy Shift aiming to survey the public’s views on carbon
footprint and energy savings and educate them on renewable energy. According to the
findings, 65% of the respondents agree to use their energy to help tackle climate change
and 44% of them are prepared to pay more for energy efficient products31. Also, 81 % of the
respondents are worried about climate change and 83 % are worried about relying on
imported gas and oil (Table 8&9)24.
Table 9: Agreement of respondents towards use of energy and money to tackle climate
change31.
Table 10: Awareness of respondents towards climate change and reliance on imported gas
and oil24.
Τηε µαιν χονχερν οφ πυβλιχ ισ τηε εµισσιον οφ χαρβον διοξιδε ιν ελεχτριχιτψ γενερ
ατιον. Τηισ εµισσιον χαννοτ βε ελιµινατεδ ασ ενεργψ ισ προδυχεδ φροµ χονϖερσιον
οφ χαρβον ιν φυελσ το χαρβον διοξιδε. Αχχορδινγ το ∆ΕΧΧ, 95 % οφ τηε χαρβον διο
ξιδε εµισσιονσ χοµε φροµ ενεργψ προδυχτιον ανδ χονσυµπτιον. Αλσο, τηε ρεπορτ στ
ατεδ τηατ τηε εµισσιον φροµ ελεχτριχιτψ γενερατιον ηασ δεχρεασεδ βψ 16.5 % ιν 20
20
08 χοµπαρεδ το 199025. Τηισ ισ α ρεσυλτ φροµ υσινγ µορε γασ ανδ οιλ ιν τηε γενερατ
ιον. Ψετ, αχχορδινγ το α ΒΒΧ συρϖεψ, Υνιτεδ Κινγδοµ ισ τηε 8τη βιγγεστ χαρβον διο
ξιδε εµιττερ ιν 2007 ωιτη εµισσιον οφ 564,000,000 οφ µετριχ τονσ26 (Ταβλε 11).
21
Table 11: Carbon dioxide emission from energy sector of G20 countries in 2007.
Πς πανελσ αλσο ηαϖε λοω ενεργψ παψβαχκ τιµε. Ενεργψ παψβαχκ ισ τηε ιδε
α οφ γενερατινγ µορε ενεργψ τηαν τηε ινπυτ ενεργψ υσεδ το προδυχε τηε σολαρ πανε
λσ. Τηε χοµµονλψ υσεδ πανελ, χρψσταλλινε σιλιχον ωαφερσ ηαϖε ανδ τηιν−φιλµ π
ανελσ ηαϖε 4 ψεαρσ ανδ 3 ψεαρσ παψβαχκ τιµε ρεσπεχτιϖελψ, ωιτη χυρρεντ τεχην
ολογψ. Ιτ ισ αντιχιπατεδ τηατ ιτ χαν βε ρεδυχεδ το 1 το 2 ψεαρσ ιν τηε φυτυρε. Πς πα
νελσ ηαϖε ϖερψ λονγ λιφεσπαν οφ 30 ψεαρσ ανδ 87 % το 97 % οφ ενεργψ προδυχεδ β
ψ τηε σψστεµσ ισ εξπεχτεδ το βε χλεαν.
22
Φιγυρε 12: Χυµυλατιϖε Νετ Χλεαν Ενεργψ Παψοφφ φορ Πς σψστεµσ27.
5.4
5.4 ΑΤΤΙΤΥ∆Ε ΤΟΩΑΡ∆Σ Πς ΠΑΝΕΛΣ ΑΝ∆ ΧΛΙΜΑΤΕ ΧΗΑΝΓΕ
Φιγυρε 14: Αττιτυδεσ το χλιµατε χηανγε ανδ βεηαϖιουρ χηανγε ιν α συρϖεψ ιν 2009
29
.
Table 12: Favourability to different energy sources for producing electricity from surveys
taken in 2005 and 201031.
25
Table 13: Favourability to different energy sources for producing electricity from surveys
taken in 2005 and 201031.
26
6. CONCLUSION
From this report, it is identified that the PV market is expected to grow in the next
three years. The PV market will strongly depend on the government subsidies and financial
incentives to drive the market as reflected in the PV market of Germany. Also, the high
electricity price and increasing environmental concern will increase the demand from
domestic sector. However, the manifold advancement in technology will lead to a
competitive market in terms of price reduction and increase in efficiency. Nevertheless, the
PV market in UK is expected to grow substantially in the coming years.
3.1 Opportunities
27
3.2 Threats
3.3 Recommendations
Προδυχτ ∆εϖελοπµεντ
28
συππλιερ. Τηε λοχατιον οφ µανυφαχτυρινγ φαχτορψ σηουλδ βε νεαρ τηε συππλιερσ
ανδ ενδ−υσερ το ρεδυχε τρανσπορτατιον χοστσ.
Χυστοµερ Σερϖιχε
Ηιγη−θυαλιτψ Στανδαρδσ
Ρεχογνιτιον οφ τηε προδυχτ ωιλλ ενσυρε τηε προδυχτσ θυαλιτψ ανδ χυστοµερσ τρ
υστ. Ρεχογνιτιονσ οφ Ευροπεαν Χοµµυνιτψ Ευροπεαν Σολαρ Τεστ Ινσταλλατιον (ΕΣ
ΤΙ) ανδ Ιντερνατιοναλ Ελεχτροτεχηνιχαλ Χοµµισσιον σηουλδ βε οβταινεδ το ενσυρ
ε τηε ηιγη θυαλιτψ στανδαρδσ. Λονγ−τερµ ωαρραντψ φορ τηε προδυχτ χαν αλσο εα
ρν βρανδ λοψαλτψ ανδ ινχρεασε προδυχτ σαλεσ.
29
3958 words
7. APPENDICES
PESTEL Analysis
30
8. REFFERENCES
1. Frost & Sullivan Report. (2005). European Renewable Energy Markets. Ch.4.
2. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2010). On the brink of a bright future? Pp 1-20
3. Solar Power Portal. (2010). UK solar installation figures revealed. Available at
<http://www.solarpowerportal.co.uk> [Accessed 10 November 2010]
4. Bergman. N,. & Jardine. C,. (2009). Power from the People: Domestic
Microgeneration and the Low Carbon Buildings Programme. Environmental Change
Institute, University of Oxford. Pp 28.
5. Business Insights. (2010). The Solar Power Generation Technologies Market Outlook.
Ch 2&4.
6. Osborne.M,. (2010). Sharp overtakes First Solar as revenue tops US$2.2 billion in
2009. Available at <http://www.pv-tech.org> [Accessed 10 November 2010]
7. Bergman. N,. & Jardine. C,. (No Date). The status of the UK domestic PV market- A
review of the impact of the Low Carbon Buildings Programme. Environmental Change
Institute, University of Oxford. Pp 4.
8. Key Note Limited. (2009). Renewable Energy. Ch.2
9. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs. (2009). The environment in your
pocket 2009. Pp 30.
10. Ownergy. (No Date). The Simple Guide to the Renewable Energy Tariffs. Pp 3.
11. Brignall.M,. (2010). Is solar power a bright investment? Available at
<http://www.guardian.co.uk> [Accessed 5 November 2010]
12. Office of the Gas and Electricity Markets (OFGEM). (2007). Renewables Obligation.
Available at <http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/> [Accesed 5 November 2010]
13. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). (2009). Microgeneration for your
home. Available at < http://www.lowcarbonbuildings.org.uk/> [Accessed 4 November
2010]
14. International Energy Agency. (2010). Major PV Demonstration Programme. Available
at <http://www.iea.org/> [Accessed 12 November 2010]
15. Anonymous. (2010). £1 billion to launch green investment bank. Available at
<http://www.independent.co.uk/> [Accessed 4 November 2010]
31
16. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). (2010). Energy Statistics. Pp 3.
17. Mintel Group. (2009). Home Utility Suppliers. Available at
<http://academic.mintel.com/> [Accessed 3 November 2010]
18. Faucon.B,. (2010). OPEC raises oil-demand view. Available at <http://online.wsj.com>
[Accessed 4 November 2010]
19. Hirsch.R.L,. (2010). The Impending world energy mess: What it is and what is means
to you. In: Presentation to the ASPO-USA Conference. Pp 10.
20. Frost & Sullivan Ltd. (2009). Investment Dynamics in Solar Photovoltaics. Pp 17.
21. Spectrolab Inc. (2009). Concentrator photovoltaics (cpv): frequently asked questions.
Available at <http://www.spectrolab.com/> [Accessed 6 November 2010]
22. Saga.T,. (2010). Advances in crystalline silicon solar cell technology for industrial mass
production. NPG Asia Mater. 2(3). Pp96–102.
23. O’Rourke.S,. (2009). Solar Photovoltaic Industry: Institude for analysis of solar energy.
Deutsche Bank. Pp2
24. Devine-Wright.P,. & Rathouse.K,. (2010). Evaluation of the Big Energy Shift: Final
report to DECC and Sciencewise-ERC. Kathryn Rathouse Social Research and
Placewise. Pp (Appendix)
25. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). (2009). Carbon dioxide emissions
and energy consumption in the UK. Pp 17-21
26. BBC News. (2009).Where countries stand on Copenhagen. Available at
<http://www.bbc.co.uk> [Accessed 7 November 2010]
27. U.S. Department of Energy. (2004). PV FAQs. The National Renewable Energy
Labratory. Pp 1-2.
28. PV cycle Association. (2010). Making Photovoltaics "Double Green". Available at
<http://www.pvcycle.org/> [Accessed 5 November 2010]
29. Department for Transport. (2010). Public attitude towards climate change and the
impact of transport: 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. Pp14.
30. Department of Climate and Energy Change. (2009). Renewable energy awareness and
attitudes research. Pp 17
31. Spence. A. Et.al. (2010). Public Perceptions of Climate Change and energy futures in
Britain. Cardiff: School of Psychology. Pp11.
32
32. BBC News. (2010). British Gas to raise gas and electricity bills by 7%. Available at
<www.bbc.co.uk> [Accessed 15 November 2010]
33. Chen Ming, (2009). The effect of technological improvement on the development of
photovoltaic industry. International Conference on Computer Technology and
Development. Pp 602
34. The Pew Charitable Trusts. (2010). Who’s winning the clean energy race? Growth,
Competition and Opportunity in the World’s Largest Economies. Pp 7
35. First Solar. (2010). Financial Results. Available at <http://phx.corporate-ir.net>
[Accessed 2 November 2010]
36. Suntech Power. (2010). Annual Reports. Available at <http://ir.suntech-power.com>
[Accessed 2 November 2010]
37. Sharp. (2009). Annual Report 2009. Pp 19.
33