Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gustavo Paz
Gun Control
English Composition 1
Professor Guarneri
25 February 2022
Gun Control legislation is a sensitive and controversial subject that has been debated for
crime. In an era of recent mass shootings, trying to find the solution to this problem has
desperately divided the nation. One side argues that firearms should be prohibited from the
public, including police officers. All law-abiding and mentally stable citizens of the United
States should be able to carry weapons to protect themselves from others who may want to harm
them. Prohibiting firearms entirely would not prevent criminals from obtaining such weapons;
Criminals will not be deterred from obtaining weapons if arms and ammunition are
restricted. Whether or not regulations are established to limit criminals' access to weapons, it will
not prevent mass shootings. “The catalyst of shootings is not the guns, but the criminals behind
them. The problem is not gun control, but criminal control. Rather than creating more laws, we
should focus on enforcing the current ones, punishing the criminals who commit these types of
crimes, and encouraging responsible ownership” (Ammen 4). Therefore, criminals are already
intending to break the law, and as a result, they will use them in public regardless of the rules
2
and regulations in effect. Criminals can carry out mass shootings largely due to the availability of
unlawful firearms on the market. As stated in “Anti-Crime `Solutions' are Misguided” by the
Chicago Times, “ …gun control will have no direct effect on the criminal's ability to acquire
guns. The small number of gun control proponents who have thought this issue through admit
this fact. They counter that, by increasing the price of guns on the black market, gun control will
serve to impede the access of criminals to guns” (Chicago Times, Agency). The population's
attempts to decrease mass shootings in public will have both positive and negative consequences
since gun purchases are bought on the black market. It will also cause the general people to
Another argument against enacting more and more rules to control weapons, in order to
decrease mass shootings is that, from the perspective of gangs and criminals, the more
limitations imposed on guns, the happier they are. This is because they know that the more
restrictions placed on the availability of firearms in the general population, the more probable
Gun control advocates say that limiting gun sales in order to prevent mass shootings will
also reduce crime. “Statistics also show that banning guns only encourages crime. According to a
study by SUNY-University at Albany criminal justice professor Colin Loftin, Washington, D.C.,
banned handguns in 1976, and by 1991 its homicide rate tripled. Meanwhile, the national
homicide rate rose only 12 percent” (Hale). Despite the fact that the United States has had many
mass shootings in the last decade, prohibiting weapons will actually raise crime rates, as it has
already done in Washington, DC. To sum up, the statistics support the fact that banning guns
In conclusion, it is clear from the points stated above that having stronger gun laws does
not always imply a reduction in the number of mass shootings and crimes. There is an inverse
association that has been discovered between states with stronger gun prohibitions and the
frequencies of crime and armed robbery in these cities. In order to prevent mass shootings,
effective tactics must be used rather than relying on the strategy of banning gun ownership by the
general public.
4
Works Cited
"Anti-Crime `Solutions' are Misguided: [LATE SPORTS FINAL Edition]." Chicago Sun -
Elijah Ammen, Home s. "AT ISSUE: GUN CONTROL - CON: [METRO EDITION]." The
Hale, Ellen. "British Fear Rise of 'Gun Culture' Report Points to Increase in Armed Crimes
After Weapons Ban Went into Effect in 1997: [FINAL Edition]." USA TODAY Aug