Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
South East Asia is a growing pharmaceutical market. The regulatory environment h
as
similar characteristics but drug registration requirements and processes differ
among the
countries. An ASEAN initiative to harmonize the requirements for drug registrati
on is
in progress. Many multi-national research-based pharmaceutical companies have be
gun
to conduct multi-center trials in their global drug development programs involvi
ng
Asian medical centers for faster patient recruitment to achieve faster drug deve
lopment.
In the recent years, there is a steady increase in clinical trial activities in
South East Asia.
Key words
Regulatory, drug registration, clinical trial, South East Asia, ASEAN
Introduction
The regulatory environment in the SE Asian countries has certain features that
are similar but, in general, there are differences in systems and practices. The
characteristics of the regulatory environment are listed in Table 2. Many of the
regulatory agencies in the countries suffer from having rather weak
infrastructures primarily due to limited human resources. Some of the agencies
have less than five staff in handling the registration matters of new drugs. As
a
result, the agencies traditionally performed mainly administrative work and simp
ly
endorse approvals of new drugs after other so-call advanced countries have
previously approved them. This has set the scene for the existing approval
systems in these counties relying heavily on the Free Sales Certificate or
Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product (CPP) issued by reference or advanced
countries for registration of new drugs.
The regulatory agencies in the SE Asia countries, listed in Table 3, have been
organized differently and some changes have taken place in the recent years.
The most significant change in the system was seen in Singapore. In 2001, the
Singapore agency was reorganized into a statutory board known as the Health
Sciences Authority that run in a corporative fashion. The agency has established
two centers to deal with drug registration; the Centre of Pharmaceutical
Administration (CPA) is the licensing body that performs administrative work
related to drug registration while the Centre of Drug Evaluation (CDE) to perfor
m
scientific and medical evaluations of new drug applications. The CDE has
established for the first time in-house capability for scientific and medical re
views
of submissions and provide regulatory consultations to the industry. However
partly due to the small number of staff available at the CDE, the center still h
ave
to rely heavily on external reviewers, many of them academic pharmaceutical
and medical scientists from the local university. Many other regulatory agencies
in SE Asia have similar constraint in in-house resources dealing with new drug
applications, the reviewing process involves external experts in their countries
at
some points.
Table 3. Regulatory Agencies in S.E. AsiaIndonesia :National Agency of Drug & Fo
od ControlMalaysia:Drug Control Authority, NCE UnitPhilippines:BFAD, DoHThailand
:ThaiFDA, Drug Control Div.
Singapore:Health Sciences Authority (HSA)
Centre for Pharmaceutical Admin. (CPA)
Centre for Drug Evaluation (CDE)
In the region, drug registration processes vary considerably among the countries
with different sets of requirements for new drug approvals. From the past
experience, the approval timelines in the countries vary from 6 to 24 months.
The author has analyzed available in-house data on 6 new drugs recently
registered in the 5 ASEAN countries and the approval timelines are shown in
Figure 1. The data also allowed estimation of the ranges of registration timelin
es
in the countries to be made: Singapore and Thailand, 6-12 months, Indonesia
and the Philippines 12 ¡V18 months and Malaysia may take up to 2 years.
8.323.98.816.67.67.716.44.111.94.19.237.34.926.84.319.89.69.222.29.920.215.85.79
.57.20.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.040.0Singapor
MalaysiaThailandIndonesiaPhilippinesNo. of Months
Product AProduct BProduct CProduct DProduct EProduct FFigure 1. NCE Approval Tim
e
7.521.49.112.615.3
Registration Requirements
Indonesia
Malaysia
PhilippinesSingapore
ThailandRemarksRegulatory / Administrative
DocumentsCPP (COO)YYYYYMALAYSIA: CPP at Stage 3Ytrack IIGMP Certificates (Manufa
cturer &
Packager)
YYYYYNotarized & Legalized of above?YYYYYPatent InformationYYYYYYYYYYYINDONESIA
: porcine sources
not acceptable.
For ingredient of animal origin:
Declarations specifying the origin (animal
species)
Manufacturer's RegistrationTable 4. REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS
Additional FSC (2)
Manufacturing license (Manufacturer &
Packager)
Info of manufacturers of ingredients
.
Table 5. CPP REQUIREMENTSSubmissionCOO is required for approval. Export certific
ate can be
used in place of a CPP from COO for submission, but
CPP from COO is required for approval.
PHILIPPINESSubmissionCOO ¡Vfor Track I and Track III
Track II ¡VAssessment Reports + 2 CPPs(EMEA &/or
countries with GES) or Assessment Reports + 3 CPPs
(countries with GES)
INDONESIASubmissionCOOTHAILANDStage 3COO (Manufacturer or final packager/ produc
t releaser)MALAYSIASubmissionCOO or from the recognized countries (with CPA¡¦s
permission)
SINGAPORERequired atCPP RequirementsCountry
Table 6 shows the other requirements for new drug registration. The common
files are formulation, manufacturing method, method of analysis and
specifications, cert of analysis, and stability report. The Philippines authorit
y
requires additional documents such as in-process control, validation documents
and plant descriptions. Most countries require samples of product, samples for
testing and working standards. All countries also would need to have proposal
for labeling and pack insert. Documents on pre-clinical, pharmacology,
toxicology, clinical pharmacology and clinical studies are standard requirements
.
The Malaysian and Thai authorities require additionally 3 published studies; thi
s
requirement has often presented difficulties for companies to fulfill and delay
the
registration.
Indonesia
Malaysia
PhilippinesSingapore
ThailandRemarksBasic CMC Documents
In Process ControlYYYFormulationYYYYYManufacturing MethodYYYYYMethod of Analysis
& SpecificationsYYYYYValidation Documents
YYYSingapore - Protocol, Reports
and Summary of Results.
Plant Facility DescriptionYYYYYYYYYYYPhilippines - numerical /
descriptive results.
YYYYYRegistration Samples
3522Samples for Analytical Testing with CoAYYYYYYYPackaging Materials
YYYYY35525YYYYYPre-Clinical & Clinical Documents
YYYYYPharmacology & Toxicology YYYYYPD / PK YYYYYYYYYClinical Documents YYYYYPub
lished Clinical Papers33Visual Samples (Commercial Packs) with
Original CoASamples of Working standards
Pre -Clinical Documents
Bioavailability study reportTable 6. REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS
Proposal for labeling (artwork; carton,
labels, blisters, package insert)
No. of sets requiredCoA for each excipientsCoA of Final Product
Stability Report
Pack Insert
The review processes vary from country to country in the region. In Indonesia, a
pre-registration consultation should take place before formal submission of file
s.
The procedures are defined by three tracks. Track I is for orphan drugs or drugs
for treating life-threatening diseases. Track II and III are for products carryi
ng
different approval status. The agency sets target review timelines for Track I
at100 days, Track II at 150 days, and Track III at 300 days. For Track II produc
ts,
assessment reports are required on top of a CPP, although CPP from non-COO
is acceptable. The fee for registration is Indonesian Rupiah 20 million (about
US$2,000).
In Thailand, after filing, the company can choose to make a formal presentation
to the agencies staff and medical reviewers on data submitted. After approval,
most new drugs are subjected to post-marketing surveillance (PMS) for several
years and hence the authority would demand PMS study protocol to be
submitted before product approval is granted. The registration fee is Thai Baht
2,000 (about US$50). The target review timeline is 7 months.
In the Philippines, the agency may request the company to perform local
registration trial if there is no proof of the product¡¦s clinical use in more than
5,000 patients in the COO; even the product is approved in the COO. The fee for
product registration is around PhP 20,000 (about 400 USD) and the target review
timeline is 12 to 18 months.
In Singapore, since the establishment of the CDE, the submission of new drug
application via the so-called ¡¥CDE route¡¦ could be done prior to any approval of
the product elsewhere and hence one can file for new drug registration in
Singapore simultaneously as the NDA is filed in the COO or in other advanced
countries. The fee is in the region of S$8,000 (about US$4,500) for a file of
10,000 pages. More detailed fee structure for submission could be found in CDE
web-site
(http://www.hsa.gov.sg/hsa/CDE/CDE_service_directory_feesschedulefornda.htm). Ta
rget review timeline is 30 weeks.
A recent Centre of Medicine Research International survey (1) showed that most
international companies would prefer to submit registration files simultaneously
in
Asia when the NDA is submitted to the COO or other developed countries.
However due to various reasons, not many companies can achieve this goal and
certainly not with all their products. It is well recognized that there are stil
l many
regulatory barriers hindering simultaneous submission in SE Asia and the
diversity in requirements is one of the most important. In view of this, the ASE
AN
countries have started a harmonization initiative in 1999. The initiative, known
as
the ASEAN Consultative Committee for Standards and Quality ¡V Pharmaceutical
Product Working Group (ASEAN CCCSQ-PPWG), aimed at establishing
common technical requirements and to develop quality guidelines for product
registrations. When these documents are ready and be implemented in 2003 -
2004, the registration timelines in ASEAN will be significantly aligned.
While waiting for the ultimate harmonization to become a reality, the Singapore
agency HSA has been progressive in making international cooperation. HAS has
recently signed pact with the health authority of Australia, TGA. The cooperatio
n
is aiming at a better sharing of experiences and this will bring an improved
reviewing process to Singapore.
Asia is increasingly being recognized as an important base for R&D. Many multi-
national research-based pharmaceutical companies are beginning to see the
potential of Asia in contributing to drug development. Several companies and
CROs have established their trial monitoring organizations and built facilities
in
Asia to perform trials to international standards and meeting regulatory
requirements. The large patient pool available for trials in Asia has potential
for
faster patient recruitment, and hence trials involving Asia medical centers may
contribute to shortening the development time of new drugs. A recent review has
discussed the challenges and benefits of conducting drug development clinical
trials in SE Asia (2).
For the past many years, although SE Asian countries had demonstrated their
capabilities in performing clinical trials, there were still many issues which
discouraged companies from bringing in Phase II and III studies to the region.
One of the issues was the long clinical trial approval process. It sometimes too
k
longer than 6 months for an approval to be granted in some countries and hence
limits their participation. With the joint efforts of industry, hospital and reg
ulatory
authorities, there has been a steadily improvement in shortening the timelines
lately. In some countries nowadays, IRB and regulatory submissions could be
done simultaneously and this has significantly improved the overall timeline for
new trial start-up. In general, the approval timeline now is 3 to 4 months in SE
Asia and for most trials it is acceptable for them to join. Table 7 shows the
average timelines for clinical trial approvals in the 5 ASEAN countries.
Table 7. Clinical Trial Approval Timelines in SE Asia6Y1659Philippines3N1469Thai
land3412No of
studies
N14105MalaysiaY13117IndonesiaN1138SingaporeParallel
(Y/N)
Approval
period
(weeks)
Regulatory
Approval
(median weeks)
IRB
Approval
(Median weeks)
The results from the survey were indicative of some multinational research-based
pharmaceutical companies¡¦ strategy in including Asia in their globalised drug
development program. Increase in the participation in global drug development
programs by Asian medical centers will contribute to shorten development time
and to achieve simultaneous drug registration, and thereby to reach the goal
shared by all in drug industry and regulatory agencies: ensuring quicker access
to new and innovative medicines for all patients and to meet their medical needs
wherever they are.
References