Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BIOTECHNOLOGY
If physics and chemistry drove the industrial transformations of the twentieth century, biology
promises to generate groundbreaking technological applications in the present one. Humanity’s
growing ability to map, mimic, and manipulate the genetic code of organisms is opening up new
possible applications of biology in areas ranging from agriculture and medicine to information
technology (IT) and warfare.
Applications of Biotechnology
First, agricultural biotechnology can help meet the world’s food supply needs as populations
increase. Scientific advances have produced new genes that can fortify crops to withstand natural
calamities, pests, and diseases (including crops like Bacillus thuringiensisor Bt cotton) or to
provide higher nutritional value (as with golden rice). One technique is to employ RNA-based
gene-silencing sprays to make crops more viral-resistant or drought-resistant. Similar advances
can help improve the quality and quantity of milk, eggs, and meat, as well as produce healthier,
faster-growing animals.
Second, biotechnology can be used to reduce carbon emissions and otherwise promote
environmental conservation efforts. Using microbes, oil-based raw materials in the plastics
industry can be replaced with more ecofriendly raw materials like sugars. This type of
technology can also be employed to mitigate environmental hazards, including oil spills and
radioactive waste.
Third, biotechnology has led to new ways of treating a variety of human diseases. Clinical trials
involving gene therapy have successfully prevented the further development of Alzheimer’s in
mice suffering from the initial stages of the disease, and gene therapy reversed sickle-cell anemia
for the first time in a French teenager.
Biotech advances in the healthcare space are also spurring revolutions in the development of
drugs. The mapping of genetic variations among individuals has opened new possibilities in the
field of personalized medicine, potentially enabling physicians to prescribe drugs tailored to
patients’ genetic profiles to maximize their therapeutic effects. To cite one example, such
pharmacogenetic testing has already become an integral part of breast cancer treatment.
Fourth, the twin fields of genomics and bioinformatics are also poised to revolutionize
healthcare, by coupling the advances of biotechnology with the collection and analysis of huge
volumes of genetic and biological big data.
Fifth, industrial biotechnology employs complete microbial cells or cellular enzymes to generate
products for industrial use. Industrial biotechnology involves the manufacturing of chemicals,
biodegradable plastics, food additives, biofuels, or other enzyme-based products. One example is
the use of recombinant DNA technology to make BioSteel; genes isolated from a silk-spinning
spider are inserted into the genome of a goat egg prior to fertilization to produce a highly
resilient silk product. This type of transgenic goat, once mature, creates a spider silk–based
protein through its milk that can be used to manufacture athletic shoes and other
products.27 Another example involves the production of biorubber using sugar rather than
traditional hydrocarbons, thereby providing a reliable and sustainable alternative to the raw
materials typically used in the rubber and plastics industries.
The Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India (BRAI) is a proposed regulatory body in India
for uses of biotechnology products including genetically modified organisms (GMOs).[1] The
institute was first suggested under the Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India (BRAI) draft
bill prepared by the Department of Biotechnology in 2008. Since then, it has undergone several
revisions.
THE BIOTECHNOLOGY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, BILL, 2013
BRAI will regulate the research, transport, import, containment, environmental release,
manufacture, and use of biotechnology products.
A Biotechnology Regulatory Appellate Tribunal will hear civil cases that involve a
substantial question relating to modern biotechnology and hear appeals on the decisions
and orders of BRAI.
Under the Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology three federal
agencies i.e. USDA-APHIS, EPA and FDA regulates GMOs under existing policies in a
product based approach.
USDA-APHIS, United States Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service
USDA-APHIS protects the health and value of American agriculture and natural
resources by regulating GMOs that has been developed by or contain plant pest
components.
USEPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency
USEPA protects the environment by regulating new pesticidal substances if produced by
any GMOs.
India’s biopharmaceuticals sector in particular has enormous opportunities for growth. This
stems from the country’s large population, along with substantial predicted revenue growth
from medical tourism.39 The sector counts vaccines, diagnostics, and recombinant
therapeutics among its major drivers of growth.40 Starting with the days of vaccine
production by the Haffkine Institute in Mumbai and the Pasteur Institute of India in the early
1900s,41 this sector has produced globally acclaimed Indian companies, including the Serum
Institute of India, Biocon, and Shantha Biotechnics. India helps supply vaccines to
international institutions, such as the World Health Organization and the United Nations
International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF)
Indian biopharmaceutical firms have also made impressive advances in recent years. While
efforts to develop a vaccine for the Zika virus are under way at multinationals like the French
firm Sanofi and the Japanese firm Takeda, Bharat Biotech, an Indian firm, has become the first
to file for a relevant patent.43 Another example is that Regenerative Medical Services, another
Indian company, has become the fourth in the world to receive regulatory approval from the
Indian government to administer a new treatment called chondron autologous chondrocyte
implantation to repair damaged cartilage in patients’ knee and hip joints.
Bioagriculture is the third largest contributor to the Indian biotechnology space, and it holds
great potential considering India is still predominantly an agricultural economy. As the NITI
Aayog, a government think tank, points out in its latest three-year action plan, GM seeds have
emerged as a powerful new technology that promises high productivity; improved quality; and
lower use of fertilizers, weedicides, and pesticides. Among crops, Bt cotton is the only GM crop
currently approved for production and commercialization in India. Mahyco Monsanto Biotech, a
joint venture between Monsanto and an Indian biotech firm called Mahyco, has developed
cutting-edge Bollgard technologies to protect Bt cotton against destructive bollworm infections,
while Nuziveedu Seeds has become the largest Bt cotton seed company in India. Biofuels,
biofertilizers, and biopesticides have also contributed significantly to the Indian bioagriculture
sector.
In India, regulations kick in starting with the process used to introduce a new genetic trait into
an organism. The multiple regulatory layers of this system ensure that, in sectors like agricultural
biotechnology, approval processes typically take between three and five years, and sometimes
even more than ten years.
Governmental and quasi-governmental actors in India’s biotech space serve at least three broad
functions: providing funding, conducting and supporting research, and monitoring adherence to
state regulations. The Department of Biotechnology (DBT), under the Ministry of Science and
Technology, is considered the main governmental body vested with state authority on matters
pertaining to biotechnology. Set up in 1986, the department promotes research, development, and
innovation in biotechnology; oversees some funding activities; and carries out regulatory
responsibilities.
The DBT also fulfills a range of regulatory functions in conjunction with committees that are
affiliated with it, including the Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM) and the
Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC). The roles of committees accentuate the
department’s significance as a regulatory institution and are enumerated in a set of rules
formulated in 1989 under the Environment Protection Act of 1986. These rules are implemented
through a series of DBT and GEAC guidelines that are updated from time to time and touch
upon vital areas including recombinant DNA (1990), transgenic seeds (1998), clinical and
preclinical data for ribosomal DNA (rDNA) vaccines (1999), genetically engineered crops and
plants (2008), and stem cell research (2013)
Under the present framework, state bodies from three different domains— biotechnology,
environmental protection, and drug control—wield varying degrees of regulatory power,
depending on the nature of a given biotech research activity or resulting products. Broadly
speaking, the regulatory system covers three areas: advisory, approval, and monitoring functions.
The Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RDAC) takes note of national and international
biotech developments and recommends suitable technologies and processes accordingly. The
RDAC therefore holds an advisory function, and its recommendations carry significant weight
when Indian safety regulations are formulated for rDNA research, use, and applications.