Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Weems Chapter 7 Outline
Weems Chapter 7 Outline
Julie Weems
2/25/19
Students with Disabilities
7.1 Historical Perspectives: The Education of Children with Disabilities
o Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania and Mills v. Board of Education-The major finding of both cases
were:
Children were excluded from public schools because they had disabilities
The effect of this policy was wholly to deprive these children of access to
a publicly funded education
The government’s purpose in excluding them was to save money
Excluding children with disabilities from school was not rationally related
to the goal of saving money because uneducated people were likely to
become a greater financial burden on the state than if they had been
educated
Exclusion of children with disabilities from school violated the Equal
Protection Clause
o Four major federal statutes designed to ensure effective education and equitable
treatment for children with disabilities
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 [Section 504]
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 [ADA]
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act [IDEA}
The No Child Left Behind Act [NCLB]
o The IDEA is a funding program with requirements that extend only to states that
accept federal funds under the Act
o Section 504 and the ADA extend protection to students and other individuals
who are not covered by IDEA, impose obligations on schools and in situations
that the IDEA does not reach, and prevent forms of disability-based
discrimination beyond the scope of IDEA
7.2 The Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act p. 256
Personal Summary/Reflection
My nephew has Angelman’s Syndrome, and he is completely dependent on trusted adults for
everything. When he began Kindergarten, I was unsure what exactly schooling would mean for
him. As I stated in the forums, I had no background with special education my first few years of
teaching and had to learn as I went along. I was surprised and pleased to learn he was in the
regular classroom with his classmates for the entire day, minus physical therapy, occupational
therapy and speech. My other concern was for his classmates. Would they be able to
concentrate with him in the classroom? Would his constant movement, laughing and crying
distract them and cause their learning to limited? Although I don’t have the answers to these
questions, his classmates treat him kindly and seem to have accepted him and his behaviors.
Teaching in a private school, we could not accommodate disabilities like Carter’s. I know our
administrator would discuss with parents why we could not serve him. Many years ago, we had
a student that had a full-time para all day. She would take her to the public school to work with
the SPED teachers there twice a day. They lived about an hour outside of town and her school
district, I believe Gordon/Rushville, paid for her para, even though she was attending a private
school in Alliance. It is difficult for me to understand why parents choose private schools when
we do not have the resources public schools have. We do not have counselors on staff, nor do
we have our own SPED, speech, physical or occupational therapists on staff.
I was pleased to learn, more in-depth, about the differences between IEPs and 504’s. I have one
student with a 504 and two with IEPs. This chapter was so eye opening for me.