CHAPTER I: THE NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY

CRITICAL ANALYSIS

Instruction:
Kindly make a critical analysis out of the article shared below. Submit your answer to the
Google form link: https://forms.gle/K996t4DKz4kfdHSG6 .Deadline of submission is on January 23,
2022, Sunday.

Why You Should Care About Philosophy: Jonny Thomson Interview

Ref: Jack MadenBy Jack Maden, March 2021, https://philosophybreak.com/articles/why-you-should-
care-about-philosophy-jonny-thomson-interview/

“There’s a great pleasure and power in finding a thought or idea expressed so perfectly it
could be ripped from your own soul.”

Jonny Thomson teaches philosophy in Oxford in the UK, and runs the popular Instagram
page, Mini Philosophy, in which he introduces followers to a whole range of philosophical ideas
through fun, bite-size, thought-provoking posts.

We caught up with Jonny about why he thinks philosophy matters today, and picked his brain
about his top three book recommendations for those looking to get into the subject.

What’s the definition of philosophy, from your perspective?

Recently, I’ve come to see being philosophical much the same as being curious. In fact, I
think “curiosity” is a much better modern term for philosophy than the classic “love of wisdom” line we
get from its etymology. It’s only in the last few centuries that we’ve come to see philosophy as being
some discipline of its own. Science was once “natural philosophy”, and all the greatest early
philosophers were as well known for their biology, psychology, history, politics, and so on... as they
were for their philosophy. So, to be curious seems a good way to explain the philosophical mind.

Mary Midgley had a great story about this. She says that, growing up, there was one
particular man who everyone referred to as being “philosophical”. She wondered what the word
meant, and learned by an odd example. This philosophical man is at work one day, when an elm tree
is caught by the wind, buffeted this way and that. It’s clearly going to topple. What makes the man
“philosophical”, is that he just can’t go back to work. He can’t do anything else. He simply has to find
out which way the tree will fall down. And so he sits, entranced, waiting to find out what will happen.

That curiosity. That sense of wanting to know, just for the sake of it. That’s what I think
philosophy is. Yes, it’s pretty broad, but that’s philosophy for you.

What first sparked your interest in philosophy?

My parents and a good teacher. Both my parents are psychologists, and they’re both hugely
wise people. My dad taught me how to truly, properly, joyfully love reading, whilst my mum taught me
that asking questions is about as fun as life can get.

But it was an inspirational teacher at school who taught me in exactly the right way, at exactly
the right time, who showed how great philosophy can be. I suspect, in hindsight, my first forays into
reading “proper” philosophy (the primary source kind) were only to impress that teacher. But, once
you’re in, you’re in.

I think teachers have incredible power. For good and for bad.

1
 Why do you think learning about philosophy is important today?

For some people, I think there are life-changing, transformative truths to be found in
philosophy. There are certain issues and problems that come with just being a human, and when you
find someone from an entirely different century or continent trying to solve those problems, I think it’s
both reassuring and therapeutic. It’s nice to know some 14 th century monk was terrified of death, too.

There’s a great pleasure and power in finding a thought or idea expressed so perfectly it
could be ripped from your own soul.

Personally, I never find myself staying long enough with one particular philosopher to find the
answer, but I know some people have, and many people will. There’s a great pleasure and power in
finding a thought or idea expressed so perfectly it could be ripped from your own soul. And yet, I’m
much more of a philosophical magpie. I’ll agree with Montaigne about this and Nietzsche about that.
It’s Descartes in the morning, and Lao Tzu at night. I’ll recommend Aristotle to some friends, and then
Kierkegaard to others. But the truth is that they’re all important.

So, having not answered the question at all, I can give the most frustratingly slippery answer
there is — you’ve got to try doing philosophy to see what it can give you. It’s a process, an adventure,
a therapy, an exploration, and a journey. You’ll find some great things along the way, and some utter
bilge, but the gold that you find will make you want to dive straight back in.

I think that’s quite enough mixed metaphors.

What would be your response to someone who dismisses philosophy as boring,

outdated, or unimportant?

To be honest, I’d have to say, “fair enough”. Sometimes, philosophy can be boring, outdated
or unimportant. I’ve read stuff which is all three.

But — there’s a big caveat to that.

Each of those words is massively context sensitive. What is boring to you now might not be in
ten years’ time. What seems outdated, has depths of truth when you come back to it later. And most
of all, what seems inconsequential to you in an earlier part of life, will suddenly seem magnificently
important later on.

I came to properly read Simone de Beauvoir, for instance, only in the last few years. I read
her once when I was in school, and couldn’t get on board with it. Now, she’s my avourite philosopher
to read. I think it’s a combination of my knowing more about philosophy, but also seeing more of life,
to appreciate what she’s talking about. I think the same is true for authors like Dostoyevky or Tolstoy.
They’re different experiences as you get older. I’ve come to appreciate the Greeks much more, too.
They really did say it all first, and they did so better than a lot of imitators that came after.

So, my response is basically to say “yep, sometimes philosophy, as anything, can feel like
that. But come back to it in a month, year, ten years, whatever, and give it another go”. I generally
have faith that most of what’s considered to be a “classic” or “genius” is so for a reason, but I don’t
think everyone discovers that at the same time.

What are the top 3 books you recommend for people beginning to get interested in
philosophy?

I’d try to recommend three types of book. Firstly, one book to ease you in (for me, that was
Nigel Warburton’s A Little History of Philosophy, which I binged in a day or two). Next, one book to get
you excited (for me, this is Nietzsche. Read Beyond Good and Evil or Genealogy of Morals first, I

2
think). Finally, one classic that defined the subject (this has to be Plato’s Republic. It’s dense, it’s
hard, but, by heck, it’s pretty much cover to cover gold).
And, of course, you have a new book coming soon… tell us about that.

Yes, the shameless plug bit! Well, the idea behind the Mini Philosophy Instagram page has
always been to try to introduce philosophical ideas in an unthreatening and accessible way. As I
mentioned above, I believe the joy and importance of philosophy comes in unearthing those ideas or
thinkers who speak directly to you. As if they’re in your head, exploring and explaining ideas you
always had but never could express yourself.

So, Mini Philosophy the book is a bit like an invitation to look at the huge breadth of these
ideas and then to dive more into them if you choose. A philosophical tasting menu...

I make sure to give every philosopher an idea as fair a hearing as possible. I hate the idea of
misrepresenting or making a straw man of anything. So, the book is, as much as can be reasonably
expected, an exploration of thinkers’ ideas as they actually were, and not as they’re often
disingenuously criticized or misunderstood.

Finally, it’s just really fun. It’s packed with everyday examples, pretty awful jokes, and more
than a few flippant side comments. It’s meant to be easily read. It’s meant to make you smile. It’s
meant to have you say, “oh, that’s pretty cool” as much as “that’s so true!”. If it does what I want it to,
it’ll be a gentle and readable guide into some pretty full on philosophy.

THANK YOU!