Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Auditing Assignment
Auditing Assignment
Submitted by:
Student’s Name SAP ID Roll No
Nandini Shukla 45401190089 B057
Declaration of Originality
I, hereby declare that this assignment titled ‘Audit Report of Nestle India Ltd.’ is entirely my
own work and that any additional sources of information have been duly cited.
I hereby declare that any offline/online sources, published or unpublished, from which I have
quoted or drawn references have been referenced fully in the bibliography list. I understand
that failure to do so will lead to plagiarism and severe disciplinary action will be initiated
against me.
I understand that I may be required to present the assignment and /or appear for viva (Offline
and/ or Online). I acknowledge it is my responsibility to keep myself updated with the
schedule of the presentation/ viva and I will ensure I am available during the same.
Student Name:
Nandini Shukla
Sign:
Name of the Company- Nestle India Ltd
Nestlé India Limited is the Indian subsidiary of Nestlé which is a Swiss multinational company.
The company is headquartered in Gurgaon, Haryana. The company's products include food,
beverages, chocolate, and confectioneries.
The company was incorporated on 28 March 1959 and was promoted by Nestle Alimentana S.A.
via a subsidiary, Nestle Holdings Ltd. As of 2020, the parent company Nestlé owns 62.76% of
Nestlé India. The company has 9 production facilities in various locations across India.
The Audit is conducted by SRBC & Co LLP which is a Limited Liability Partnership firm
incorporated on 01 April 2013. It is registered at Registrar of Companies, Kolkata. Its total
obligation of contribution is Rs. 69,500,000. Designated Partners of SRBC & Co LLP are Vikas
Kumar Pansari, Santosh Agarwal, Sudhir Murlidhar Soni, Jayesh Manhar Gandhi, Navin Kumar
Agarwal, Arvind Sethi. Current status of S R B C & Co LLP – Active.
3) Type of Opinion- The auditor has a clean or unqualified opinion about the standalone financial
statements of the company. In their opinion and according to the information provided,
statements present a true and fair representation of the financials
4) Basis of Opinion-
The auditors conducted the audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified
under section 143(10) of the Act. Their responsibilities under those SAs are further described in
the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of the report.
They are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India together with the ethical requirements that are
relevant to their audit of the financial statements under the provisions of the Act and the Rules
thereunder, and they have fulfilled their other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these
requirements and the Code of Ethics. They believe that the audit evidence they have obtained is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for their opinion on the financial statements.
5) Key Audit Matters- According to their judgment, these are the key audit matter which played
an imperative role while auditing the standalone financial statements of the year 2020:
a) Revenue Recognition-
Revenue from the sale of goods is recognized at the moment when control has been
transferred to the customer and is measured net of trade discounts, rebates and pricing
allowances to customers (collectively ‘trade spends’). There is a risk that revenue may be
overstated because of fraud, resulting from the pressure local management may feel to
achieve performance targets. Revenue is also an important element of how the company
measures its performance, upon which management is incentivized. The Company focuses on
revenue as a key performance measure, which could create an incentive for revenue to be
recognized before control has been transferred.
• They tested the design, implementation and operating effectiveness of key internal controls
around the recognition and measurement of provisions.
• They inquired the status in respect of significant provisions with the Company’s internal tax
and legal team.
• They involved our subject matter experts, wherever required, to assess the value of material
provisions in light of the nature of the exposures, applicable regulations and related
correspondence with the authorities.
• They challenged the assumptions and critical judgements made by the Company which
impacted their estimate of provision required, considering judgements previously made by
the authorities in the relevant jurisdictions or any relevant opinions given by the Company’s
advisors and assessing whether there was an indication of management bias.
• They verified the calculation of provision on a test check basis
6) Overall comment on the financial performance of the company from the point of view of the
stakeholders on the basis of auditor’s report-