You are on page 1of 7

p u b l i c h e a l t h 1 2 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 4 1 0 e4 1 6

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

Public Health

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/puhe

Original Research

Physical activity, abdominal obesity and the risk of coronary


heart disease: A Korean national sample study

J. Kim a, H.-R. Han b,*


a
Department of Nursing, Gachon University, Seongnam, South Korea
b
School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205-2110, USA

article info summary

Article history: Objectives: To examine the interaction between physical activity and abdominal obesity in
Received 24 October 2010 relation to the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) for predicting the 10-year risk of coronary
Received in revised form heart disease (CHD) using a representative sample of Korean adults.
29 September 2011 Study design: Cross-sectional study.
Accepted 25 January 2012 Methods: Drawing from the 2007 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Available online 23 March 2012 (NHANES IV-1), data from 2112 adults aged 30e74 years were analysed. The risk of CHD was
calculated according to the FRS, and odds ratios (ORs) were analysed for the at-risk group
Keywords: (probability > 10%) with multivariate logistic regression.
Exercise Results: Compared with physically active men with a normal waist circumference (WC),
Abdominal obesity inactive men with a large WC had an OR for CHD risk of 2.91 [95% confidence interval (CI)
Coronary disease 1.63e5.22]. Compared with active women with a normal WC, inactive women with a large
WC had an OR of 6.37 (95% CI 3.44e11.80). Among women with a normal WC, inactive
women were at increased risk of CHD compared with active women (OR 2.16, 95% CI
1.19e3.93). Among active individuals, both men and women with large WCs were at
increased risk of CHD compared with those with normal WCs.
Conclusions: Abdominal obesity was associated with risk of CHD regardless of the level of
physical activity. The 10-year risk of CHD associated with physical inactivity and abdominal
obesity was much stronger in Korean women than in Korean men. While the importance of
obesity control and physical activity is clear, future interventions should incorporate more
targeted abdominal obesity prevention and control efforts, especially for women.
ª 2012 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Introduction mortality.1e5 Likewise, prospective cohort studies and


population-based surveys have revealed that obesity is an
Physical activity and obesity are well-known factors that play independent risk factor for CHD.6,7
significant roles in the development of coronary heart disease A few recent studies conducted in Western countries seem
(CHD). Considerable evidence indicates that sedentary indi- to suggest interesting interplays between physical activity and
viduals have an increased risk of CHD and overall obesity in association with CHD. For example, Wessel et al.8

* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ1 410 6142669; fax: þ1 410 614 1446.


E-mail address: hhan@son.jhmi.edu (H.-R. Han).
0033-3506/$ e see front matter ª 2012 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2012.01.034
p u b l i c h e a l t h 1 2 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 4 1 0 e4 1 6 411

found that individuals with a sedentary lifestyle had a higher least 30 min/day on 5 days/week, or if they performed
likelihood of having coronary artery disease than individuals vigorous physical activity (e.g. running, mountain climbing,
with an active lifestyle, while obesity was not independently soccer, basketball) or any other activity that caused
associated with adverse cardiovascular events. The interplay a substantial increase in breathing or heart rate for at least
between physical activity and obesity may differ by gender. 20 min/day on 3 days/week. Subjects were assigned to the ‘less
For example, inactive women with a large waist circumfer- active’ group if they exercised regularly but at levels that were
ence (WC), as a measure of obesity, had a greater risk of CHD less than sufficient.
than inactive men with a large WC.7,9 However, no studies
were found to examine the association between physical Abdominal obesity
activity and obesity in relation to risk of CHD in East Asian WC was adopted as a variable for measuring obesity in this
populations. analysis. While the effects of obesity on the risk of CHD are
Over the past decade, CHD has emerged as a leading cause commonly evaluated using body mass index (BMI),14
of death in some East Asian countries such as Korea.10 In 2009, increasing evidence indicates that abdominal obesity, as
the age-adjusted mortality rate of CHD was 26.0 per 100,000 estimated by WC, represents a better marker of risk of CHD
persons in Korea, compared with 21.4 per 100,000 persons in than BMI.15e17 In a study among East Asians,18 abdominal
2000.11 While both physical activity and obesity represent key obesity was defined as having a large WC (90 cm for men,
lifestyle factors associated with CHD, investigating the inter- 80 cm for women). However, a higher cut-off for Korean
play between these two factors is an important first step in women was recommended from a study investigating the
attempting to identify high-risk populations and target CHD relationship between WC and risk of CHD19; WC cut-offs of
prevention efforts in Korea. The aim of this study was to 90 cm for men and 85 cm for women were used in the present
examine the interaction between physical activity and obesity study.
in relation to risk of CHD using data from the most recent
Korean national health survey. The results will be useful to Risk of CHD
suggest evidence-based lifestyle recommendations for CHD The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) was used to predict the 10-
risk reduction in the Korean population. year risk of CHD. The FRS is recognized as an important clin-
ical tool for assessing absolute risk of CHD, and uses an algo-
rithm that takes into account the following factors: age, gender,
Methods total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, diabetes
status and smoking status.18 The FRS was calculated separately
Study population for men and women aged 30e74 years and without overt CHD. A
higher FRS reflects a greater 10-year risk of developing CHD; that
This study was based on data obtained from the Korea is, very low risk <6%, low risk 6e<10%, intermediate risk
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES 10e<20%, and high risk 20%.7,20 In this paper, the high-risk
IVe1, 2007). KNHANES was conducted as a cross-sectional group was defined as 10-year risk of CHD 10%.
health survey of nationally representative samples of non-
institutionalized Korean civilians by the Korean Centers for Analysis
Disease Control and Prevention. The health interview survey
data used in this study consisted of a self-administered After analysing the sample characteristics, the study sample
questionnaire including health behaviours such as alcohol was categorized using WC and the level of physical activity.
consumption and physical activity, and a health examination WC <90 cm for men and WC <85 cm for women were cate-
survey including WC, blood pressure, total cholesterol, high- gorized as normal, and WC 90 cm for men and WC 85 cm
density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and fasting blood sugar were categorized as large. Likewise, the participants were
tests. Of the 4594 individuals in the 2007 KNHANES, 2112 categorized as physically active (moderate physical activity
respondents who were aged 30e74 years, had completed for at least 30 min/day on at least 5 days/week or vigorous
blood tests, and had no angina or myocardial infarction were physical activity for at least 20 min/day on at least 3 days/
included in this analysis. week), less active (exercise regularly but less than the sug-
gested levels above) or inactive (no regular exercise). Analysis
Measurements of variance was performed to test the relationship between
WC and physical activity for men and women. In addition,
Level of physical activity hierarchical log linear analysis was used to test interactions
Level of physical activity was measured by the International between sex, WC and physical activity. In order to examine
Physical Activity Questionnaire which included questions the relationship between abdominal obesity and physical
about frequency, duration and intensity of physical activity activity in association with high risk of CHD (10-year risk
during the prior week.12 For this analysis, the level of physical 10%) and the patterning of the relationship by sex, logistic
activity was categorized into three items.13 Subjects who regression models were fitted by obesity and level of physical
reported no physical activity were assigned to the ‘inactive’ activity, separately for men and women, and the odds ratios
group. Subjects were assigned to the ‘active’ group if they (ORs) for high risk of CHD were estimated with 95% confidence
performed moderate physical activity (e.g. tennis doubles, intervals (CIs). For logistic models, abdominal obesity was
volleyball, badminton or table tennis) or any other activity examined both as a categorical variable (normal vs large) and
that caused a slight increase in breathing or heart rate for at a continuous variable [per 1 standard deviation (SD)] for its
412 p u b l i c h e a l t h 1 2 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 4 1 0 e4 1 6

association with risk of CHD within each physical activity characteristics of various risk factors of CHD were generally
category in men and women. The multivariate analysis unfavourable among men; this gender-related difference was
included education, marital status, household income, significant for HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, smoking
household size and alcohol consumption as covariates. status and diabetic status. The proportion of subjects who
P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. were physically active was higher among men (26%) than
All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical among women (20%), whereas the proportion of physical
Package for the Social Sciences Version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., inactivity among women (61%) was higher than among men
Chicago, IL, USA). (46%). The majority of Korean women (75%) and more than
half of Korean men (52%) had a 10-year FRS for low risk of CHD
(<10%), and 47.8% of men and 25.5% of women were at high
Results risk of CHD (10%).
Gender-specific analysis for risk factors of CHD (i.e. the
Characteristics of the Korean national sample are presented level of physical activity according to abdominal obesity) is
in Table 1. The average age of the sample was 50 years, and presented in Table 2. Cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, blood
59% were women. There was no difference in the age distri- pressure, hypertensive status, fasting blood sugar and dia-
bution between men and women. The proportion of highly betes status were unfavourable among men and women with
educated (some college) subjects was lower among women large WCs. Among women, older and sedentary women had
than among men. Most subjects were married, and the larger WCs.
average monthly household income was $2037. Sixty-three The interactions between WC and physical activity are
percent of Korean men and 25% of women reported presented separately for men and women in Table 3. Less
consuming alcohol biweekly or more frequently. The mean active women had lower WCs than active or inactive women
WC was 85.1 cm in men and 81.9 cm in women. The overall (F ¼ 3.640, P ¼ 0.027).

Table 1 e Characteristics of the sample (n [ 2112).


Men (n ¼ 867) n (%), Women (n ¼ 1245) n (%), c2/t P
mean (SD) mean (SD)

Age (years) 50.9 (12.7) 49.9 (12.9) 1.771 0.077


30e44 315 (36.3) 495 (39.8) 2.701 0.259
45e64 374 (43.1) 516 (41.4)
65e74 178 (20.5) 234 (18.8)
Household income ($/month) 2000.8 (1536.8) 2090.2 (1550.8) 1.311 0.190
Household size (no. of people) 3.5 (1.3) 3.4 (1.3) 0.293 0.769
Waist circumference (cm) 85.1 (8.1) 81.9 (9.6) 10.901 <0.001
Total cholesterol (mmol/l) 4.9 (0.9) 5.0 (1.0) 0.881 0.378
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.0 (0.3) 1.1 (0.3) 6.560 <0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 121.0 (16.1) 114.9 (17.7) 8.271 <0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 79.6 (10.1) 74.0 (9.5) 13.101 <0.001
Fasting blood sugar (mmol/l) 2.6 (0.6) 2.5 (0.6) 3.399 0.001
Education
Middle school and under 302 (34.8) 588 (47.2) 45.348 <0.001
High school 290 (33.4) 404 (32.4)
Some college 275 (31.7) 253 (20.3)
Married 760 (87.7) 991 (79.6) 23.430 <0.001
Alcohol
Never been a drinker 141 (16.3) 507 (40.7) 320.900 <0.001
Monthly or less 179 (20.6) 431 (34.6)
Biweekly or more 547 (63.1) 307 (24.7)
Hypertensiona 148 (17.1) 228 (18.3) 0.540 0.463
Current smoker 371 (42.8) 51 (4.1) 478.619 <0.001
Diabetesb 111 (12.8) 104 (8.4) 11.065 0.001
Physical activity
Active 226 (26.1) 245 (19.7) 49.118 <0.001
Less active 241 (27.8) 235 (18.9)
Inactive 400 (46.1) 765 (61.4)
Framingham Risk Score
Very low (<6%) 270 (31.1) 742 (59.6) 203.385 <0.001
Low (6%e<10%) 183 (21.1) 186 (14.9)
Intermediate (10%e<20%) 254 (29.3) 256 (20.6)
High (20%) 160 (18.5) 61 (4.9)

SD, standard deviation.


a Hypertension: any respondent taking antihypertensive medication or a person with blood pressure 140 and/or 90 mmHg.
b Diabetes: any respondent taking antidiabetic drug, insulin injection or with fasting blood sugar 3.3 mmol/l.
p u b l i c h e a l t h 1 2 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 4 1 0 e4 1 6 413

Table 2 e Risk factors for coronary heart disease: level of physical activity according to abdominal obesity (n [ 2112).
Normal waist Large waist c2/t P
circumferencea circumferencea
(n ¼ 1468) (n ¼ 644)

Men
Age (years) 50.9 (12.8) 50.8 (12.4) 0.169 0.866
Cholesterol (mmol/l) 4.9 (0.9) 5.0 (0.8) 2.280 0.023
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.1 (0.3) 0.9 (0.2) 9.800 <0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 119.8 (16.3) 124.2 (15.2) 3.593 <0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 78.4 (9.6) 82.7 (10.7) 5.413 <0.001
Hypertension, n (%) 102 (16.3) 67 (27.9) 15.008 <0.001
Current smoke, n (%) 268 (42.7) 103 (42.9) 0.002 0.963
Fasting blood sugar (mmol/l) 2.5 (0.6) 2.7 (0.7) 3.137 0.002
Diabetes, n (%) 39 (6.2) 28 (11.7) 7.221 <0.001
Physical activity, n (%)
Active 155 (24.7) 71 (18.9) 3.516 0.172
Less active 171 (27.3) 70 (29.2)
Inactive 301 (48.0) 99 (41.3)
Women
Age (years) 46.9 (12.2) 56.1 (12.0) 12.578 <0.001
Cholesterol (mmol/l) 4.8 (0.9) 5.2 (1.0) 6.886 <0.001
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.1 (0.3) 1.1 (0.2) 6.164 <0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 110.8 (16.0) 123.4 (18.0) 11.932 <0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 72.3 (9.1) 77.4 (9.3) 9.113 <0.001
Hypertension, n (%) 63 (7.5) 79 (19.6) 39.303 <0.001
Current smoke, n (%) 30 (3.7) 20 (5.0) 1.111 0.292
Fasting blood sugar (mmol/l) 2.4 (0.4) 2.7 (0.8) 7.620 <0.001
Diabetes, n (%) 20 (2.4) 50 (12.4) 51.410 <0.001
Physical activity, n (%)
Active 159 (18.9) 86 (21.3) 3.516 0.172
Less active 168 (20.0) 67 (16.6)
Inactive 514 (61.1) 251 (62.1)

Data are presented as mean (standard deviation) or n (%).


a Normal waist circumference (<90 cm for men and <85 cm for women), large waist circumference (90 cm for men and 85 cm for women).

Inter-relationships between sex, WC and physical activity Compared with active men with a normal WC, less active or
were identified in the hierarchical log linear model. Table 4 inactive Korean men with a large WC had adjusted ORs of 3.57
lists inter-relationships between the parameters. Sex was (95% CI 1.89e6.76) and 2.91 (95% CI 1.63e5.22), respectively.
significantly associated with WC and physical activity. Even among active men, a large WC was associated with
However, WC and physical activity were not associated with increased risk of 10-year risk of CHD with an adjusted OR of
each other. 2.17 (95% CI 1.16e4.06). For men with a normal WC, the level of
Table 5 shows the ORs of high risk of CHD (10% risk for 10- physical activity was not associated with an increased OR
year CHD) among men and women on the basis of level of for CHD.
physical activity and WC, before and after adjusting for Compared with active women with a normal WC, inactive
covariates. In addition, the ORs of high risk of CHD for a 1-SD women with a large WC had an adjusted OR of 6.37 (95% CI
increase in WC by level of physical activity are presented. The 3.44e11.80) for 10-year risk of CHD. Likewise, obese Korean
SD for WC was 8.1 for men and 9.6 for women. A large WC was women who were less active were 4.59 times more likely to be
significantly associated with high risk of CHD for both Korean at high risk of CHD than their counterparts with normal WCs
men and women, regardless of their level of physical activity. (95% CI 2.11e9.99). A large WC was associated with an

Table 3 e Waist circumferences according to the level of physical activity (n [ 2112).


Active Less active Inactive F P
(n ¼ 471) (n ¼ 476) (n ¼ 1165)
mean (SD) mean (SD) mean (SD)

Waist circumference (cm)


Men 85.7 (7.7) 85.3 (8.1) 84.7 (8.3) 1.221 0.295
Women 81.8 (9.2)a 79.5 (9.3)b 81.0 (9.6)a 3.640 0.027

SD, standard deviation.


Duncan grouping: a > b.
414 p u b l i c h e a l t h 1 2 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 4 1 0 e4 1 6

associated with physical inactivity and abdominal obesity was


Table 4 e Inter-relationships between sex, waist
circumference and physical activity. much stronger in Korean women than in Korean men (> 6
times vs about 3 times higher risk). This finding is consistent
Interaction c2 P
with the results of previous population-based prospective
a
Sex  waist circumference 5.886 0.015 studies conducted in the UK and the USA, where inactive
Sex  physical activity 49.128 <0.001 women with a large WC also had a greater risk of CHD than
Waist circumferencea  physical activity 2.911 0.233
inactive men with a large WC.7e9 Although such sex-specific
Sex  waist circumferencea  physical activity 3.125 0.210
differences in the association between physical activity,
a Normal waist circumference (<90 cm for men and <85 cm for abdominal obesity and risk of CHD have rarely been studied,
women), large waist circumference (90 cm for men and 85 cm a recent caseecontrol study found that the effect of physical
for women).
inactivity and abdominal obesity on inflammatory markers
associated with an increased risk of CHD was more
pronounced in women than in men.21 Together, these findings
adjusted OR of 3.42 (95% CI 1.64e7.14) for active Korean
underscore the importance of obesity control and physical
women. Among individuals with a normal WC, inactive
activity, especially among women.
Korean women were at increased 10-year risk of CHD
Whilst regular physical activity has been found to provide
compared with active Korean women (adjusted OR 2.16, 95%
some protection against CHD among individuals with
CI 1.19e3.93). Less active women with a normal WC had
a normal WC,7 the level of physical activity was not associated
slightly increased odds of developing CHD, but the OR was not
with the risk of CHD in Korean men with a normal WC.
significant. A 1-SD increase in WC was significantly associated
However, for Korean women with a normal WC, a sedentary
with the risk of CHD for both men and women. However, the
lifestyle resulted in increased risk of CHD. It is unclear why the
association was stronger for women regardless of the level of
protective effect of physical activity was only seen among
physical activity.
women. One possible explanation may be that Korean women
(but not Korean men) with a normal WC were significantly
younger than those with a large WC (mean age 47 vs 56 years,
Discussion P < 0.001). Future studies are needed to investigate this rela-
tionship further.
This analysis revealed a significant association between The independent effects of obesity are well documented.
physical activity, WC and risk of CHD in this Korean pop- Both Korean men and women with large WCs were at
ulation sample. In particular, the 10-year risk of CHD increased risk of CHD regardless of their level of physical

Table 5 e Odds ratios for high 10-year risk of coronary heart disease by physical activity and waist circumference for
Korean men and women in Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IVe1) in 2007 (n [ 2114).
Active Less active Inactive

OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI

Men (n ¼ 867)
Normal waist circumferencea
Unadjusted 1.00 e 0.77 (0.49e1.21) 1.41 (0.95e2.09)
Adjusted 1.00 e 1.02 (0.62e1.69) 1.38 (0.89e2.13)
Large waist circumferencea
Unadjusted 1.78 (1.01e3.14)* 2.06 (1.16e3.66)* 2.67 (1.58e4.50)***
Adjusted 2.17 (1.16e4.06)* 3.57 (1.89e6.76)*** 2.91 (1.63e5.22)***
Waist circumference for a 1-SD increase
Unadjusted 1.24 (0.92e1.68) 1.52 (1.12e2.04)** 1.50 (1.20e1.87)***
Adjusted 1.30 (1.05e1.62)* 1.41 (1.15e1.72)** 1.32 (1.13e1.54)**

Women (n ¼ 1245)
Normal waist circumferencea
Unadjusted 1.00 e 0.82 (0.40e1.68) 1.82 (1.06e3.12)*
Adjusted 1.00 e 1.49 (0.68e3.27) 2.16 (1.19e3.93)*
Large waist circumferencea
Unadjusted 4.20 (2.17e8.13)*** 6.75 (3.40e13.40)*** 7.77 (4.49e13.46)***
Adjusted 3.42 (1.64e7.14)** 4.59 (2.11e9.99)*** 6.37 (3.44e11.80)***
Waist circumference for a 1-SD increase
Unadjusted 1.97 (1.41e2.75)*** 2.69 (1.86e3.87)*** 2.08 (1.76e2.46)***
Adjusted 2.24 (1.55e3.23)*** 1.71 (1.24e2.34)** 1.55 (1.35e1.79)***

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation. ORs adjusted for education, marital status, household income, household size
and alcohol use.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
a Normal waist circumference (<90 cm for men and <85 cm for women), large waist circumference (90 cm for men and 85 cm for women).
p u b l i c h e a l t h 1 2 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 4 1 0 e4 1 6 415

activity. This finding is consistent with a recent Korean study 2. Tanasescu M, Leitzmann MF, Rimm EB, Willett WC,
in which abdominal obesity was associated with a higher risk Stampfer MJ, Hu FB. Exercise type and intensity in relation
of CHD,19 and also highlights the strong effect of abdominal to coronary heart disease in men. JAMA
2002;288:1994e2000.
obesity as an important cardiovascular risk factor. Even in
3. Apullan FJ, Bourassa MG, Tardif JC, Fortier A, Gayda M,
women with a normal body weight, WC was correlated with Nigam A. Usefulness of self-reported leisure-time physical
a heightened risk of CHD.22 In addition, other risk factors for activity to predict long-term survival in patients with
CHD, such as cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2008;15:375e9.
blood glucose level and smoking status, were unfavourable 4. Ueshima K, Ishikawa-Takata K, Yorifuji T, Suzuki E,
when the individual had a large WC. These results highlight Kashima S, Takao S, et al. Physical activity and mortality risk
the importance of incorporating more targeted abdominal in the Japanese elderly: a cohort study. Am J Prev Med
2010;38:410e8.
obesity prevention and control efforts in future lifestyle
5. Moholdt T, Wisloff U, Nilsen TI, Slordahl SA. Physical activity
interventions (e.g. nutritional counselling) for Koreans. and mortality in men and women with coronary heart
The present study has some limitations that should be disease: a prospective population-based cohort study in
considered. The study was cross-sectional; it was therefore Norway (the HUNT study). Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil
impossible to establish cause-and-effect relationships 2008;15:639e45.
between physical activity, WC and risk of CHD. The physical 6. Hu FB, Willett WC, Li T, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA,
Manson JE. Adiposity as compared with physical activity in
activity data were self-reported and restricted to the previous
predicting mortality among women. N Engl J Med
week. Nevertheless, studies have shown that the self-report
2004;351:2694e703.
physical activity questionnaire used in the study is valid and 7. Arsenault BJ, Rana JS, Lemieux I, Despres JP, Kastelein JJ,
reliable for the Korean population.23 The present study was Boekholdt SM, et al. Physical inactivity, abdominal obesity
conducted on a nationwide basis; both physical inactivity and and risk of coronary heart disease in apparently healthy men
abdominal obesity were found to affect the risk of CHD among and women. Int J Obes 2010;34:340e7.
the Korean cohort. Future studies are needed to investigate 8. Wessel TR, Arant CB, Olson MB, Johnson BD, Reis SE,
Sharaf BL, et al. Relationship of physical fitness vs body mass
various types of physical activity, such as walking or occu-
index with coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events
pational activities.20 in women. JAMA 2004;292:1179e87.
In conclusion, the 10-year risk of CHD in the Korean national 9. Hu G, Tuomilehto J, Silventoinen K, Barengo N, Jousilahti P.
sample was significantly higher among those with a large WC Joint effects of physical activity, body mass index, waist
than in those with a normal WC. However, being physically circumference and waist-to-hip ratio with the risk of
active did not eliminate the higher risk of CHD among Korean cardiovascular disease among middle-aged Finnish men and
women. Eur Heart J 2004;25:2212e9.
men and women with abdominal obesity. These findings
10. Khor GL. Cardiovascular epidemiology in the Asia-Pacific
confirm the importance of both physical activity and obesity region. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2001;10:76e80.
control among Koreans in order to reduce the overall risk of 11. Statistics Korea. Cause of death statistics. Available at: http://
CHD. Korean women, in particular, should be encouraged to kosis.kr/abroad/abroad_01List.jsp [last accessed 14.07.10].
engage in physical activity and to maintain a normal WC. 12. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML,
Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity
questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci
Sports Exerc 2003;35:1381e95.
Acknowledgements 13. Han MA, Kim KS, Park J, Kang MG, Ryu SY. Association
between levels of physical activity and poor self-rated health
Ethical approval in Korean adults: the third Korea national health and
nutrition examination survey (KNHANES), 2005. Public Health
2009;123:665e9.
The Ethics Committee at the Korean Centers for Disease
14. Weinstein AR, Sesso HD, Lee IM, Rexrode KM, Cook NR,
Control and Prevention reviewed and approved the national Manson JE, et al. The joint effects of physical activity and
survey. body mass index on coronary heart disease risk in women.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:884e90.
Funding 15. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Bautista L, Franzosi MG,
Commerford P, et al. Obesity and the risk of myocardial
This research was supported by the Gachon University infarction in 27,000 participants from 52 countries:
a caseecontrol study. Lancet 2005;366:1640e9.
Research Fund in 2011 (KWU-2011-R100).
16. Balkau B, Deanfield JE, Despres JP, Bassand JP, Fox KA,
Smith Jr SC, et al. International day for the evaluation of
Competing interests abdominal obesity (IDEA): a study of waist circumference,
cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus in 168,000
None declared. primary care patients in 63 countries. Circulation
2007;23:1942e51.
17. Mosca L, Edelman D, Mochari H, Christian AH, Paultre F,
Pollin I. Waist circumference predicts cardiometabolic and
references global Framingham risk among women screened during
national woman’s heart day. J Womens Health
2006;15:24e34.
1. Lee IM, Sesso HD, Paffenbarger Jr RS. Physical activity and 18. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel
coronary heart disease risk in men: does the duration of on Detection. Evaluation, and treatment of high blood
exercise episodes predict risk? Circulation 2000;29:981e6. cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III). Third report
416 p u b l i c h e a l t h 1 2 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 4 1 0 e4 1 6

of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert 21. Rana JS, Arsenault BJ, Després JP, Côté M, Talmud PJ, Ninio E,
panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood et al. Inflammatory biomarkers, physical activity, waist
cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) final report. circumference, and risk of future coronary heart disease in
Circulation 2002;106:3143e421. healthy men and women. Eur Heart J; 2009 [e-pub ahead of
19. Park SH, Choi SJ, Lee KS, Park HY. Waist circumference and print 18 February 2009].
waist-to-height ratio as predictors of cardiovascular disease 22. Kwon S. Association between abdominal obesity and
risk in Korean adults. Circ J 2009;73:1643e50. cardiovascular risk factors in normal-weight Korean women.
20. Hu G, Tuomilehto J, Borodulin K, Jousilahti P. The joint Health Care Women Int 2009;30:447e52.
associations of occupational, commuting, and leisure-time 23. Lee DT, Seo YS, Son YS, Moon EM, Jin YJ. Estimation of
physical activity, and the Framingham risk score on the 10- physical activity levels using international physical activity
year risk of coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J questionnaire (IPAQ) and its reliability for overweight middle
2007;28:492e8. aged women. J Korean Soc Living Environ Sys 2007;14:1e8.

You might also like