Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesson 8 - Forward Flight - Rotor Motion
Lesson 8 - Forward Flight - Rotor Motion
Lesson 08
Rotorcraft Aerodynamics
Forward Flight:
Rotor Motion Calculations
Forward Flight
2
The angle of attack of an airfoil
depends on
• Pilot input: collective and cyclic pitch
• How the blade is twisted
• Velocity of the air normal to blade chord, caused
by the blade flapping
• Inflow due to freestream component, and
induced inflow
• Anhedral and dihedral effects due to coning of
the blades.
• The first two bullets are self-evident. Let us look
at the other contributors to the angle of attack.
3
Blade Flapping Effect
𝑟 𝛽ሶ
𝑉∞ 𝑉∞ 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 + 𝑣
Ω𝑟 + 𝑉∞𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼
5
Anhedral/Dihedral Effect
𝑉∞
𝑉∞𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽 𝑉∞𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽
Blade at = 0 will
𝑉∞𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼𝑉∞ See a downwash
equal to 𝑉∞𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽
Blade at = 180 will
See a downwash equal
to −𝑉∞𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽
Blade at any will see a downwash equal to
𝑉∞𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽 cos
6
Summing them all up..
aeff
𝑈𝑃 q
𝑈𝑇 = Ω𝑟 + 𝑉∞𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜓
U P UP
a eff = q − tan q −
−1
U T UT
where,
U = V sin a + v + r + V cos sin
P
7
Small Angle of Attack Assumptions
• The angle of attack 𝛼 is small.
• The cyclic and collective pitch angles are
all small.
• The coning and flapping angles are all
small.
• 𝑐𝑜𝑠(𝛼) = 𝑐𝑜𝑠(𝛽) = 𝑐𝑜𝑠(𝜃) ~ 1
• 𝑠𝑖𝑛(𝛼) ~ 𝛼, 𝑠𝑖𝑛(𝛽) ~ 𝛽, 𝑠𝑖𝑛(𝜃) ~ 𝜃
8
Angle of Attack
UP U P U Tq − U P
a effecive = q − arctan
q − =
UT UT UT
r
q = q 0 + q tw + q 1c cos + q 1s sin
R
d d d d
= = =
dt d dt d
= (1s cos − 1c sin )
10
Angle of Attack (Continued)
After some minor algebra,
U T q − U P = r q 0 + q tw + (q1c − 1s ) cos + (q1s + 1c )sin
r
R
r
V q 0 + q tw sin + V (q1c − 1s ) cos sin +
R
V (q1s + 1c )sin 2 − V 0 cos − Va − V1c − v
11
Relationship between aTPP and as
𝛼𝑠 𝛽1𝑐
𝛼𝑇𝑃𝑃 = 𝛼𝑠 + 𝛽1𝑐
12
Angle of Attack (Concluded)
r q +
0 tw R q
r
+ (q 1c − 1s ) cos + (q 1s + 1c ) sin
U Tq − U P 1 r
a effective = = + q
0 tw
V + q sin + V (q 1c − 1s ) cos sin
UT UT R
+ V (q1s + 1c )sin 2 − V 0 cos
− Va TPP −
14
Some choices for Computing
Sectional Loads as a function of a
• In analytical work, it is customary to use 𝐶𝑙 =
𝐶𝑙𝛼 𝛼, 𝐶𝑑 = 𝐶𝑑0 = constant, and 𝐶𝑚 = 𝐶𝑚0 , as
constant.
• In simple computer based simulations using
Excel or a program, these loads are corrected
for compressibility using Prandtl-Glauert Rule.
16
Prandtl-Glauert Rule
𝑉∞
aeff
𝑈𝑃 q
𝑈𝑇 = Ω𝑟 + 𝑉∞𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜓
𝜓
Compute Mach number= 𝑀 = 𝑈𝑇 /𝑎∞
Cl ,incompressible
X Cl ,corrected =
1− M 2
17
Calculation of Sectional Forces
• After 𝐶𝑙 , 𝐶𝑑 , 𝐶𝑚 are L’=Lift per
foot of
found, one can find
span
the lift, drag, and
aeff
pitching moments per D’
unit span. q
• These loads are 𝑈𝑇 = Ω𝑟 + 𝑉∞𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜓
normal to, and along
1
the total velocity, and L = U 2 cCl
2
must be rotated 1
= c(U T2 + U P2 )Cla a eff
appropriately. 2
cCla U T (U T q − U P )
1
19
2
Forward Flight
20
Background
• We have discussed how to compute the angle of attack
of a typical blade element.
• We also discussed how to compute lift, drag, and
pitching moment coefficients.
• We also discussed how to compute sectional lift and
drag forces per unit span.
• We mentioned that these loads must be rotated to get
components normal to, and along reference plane.
• In this section, we discuss how to integrate these loads.
• In computer codes, these integrations are done
numerically.
• Analytical integration under simplifying assumptions will
be given here to illustrate the process.
21
Assumptions for
Analytical Integration
• 𝑐= constant (untapered blades)
• 𝑣 = constant (uniform inflow)
• 𝐶𝑑 = constant
• Linearly twisted blades
• No cut out, no tip losses.
22
Blade Section
aeff
𝑈𝑃 q
𝑈𝑇 = Ω𝑟 + 𝑉∞𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜓
23
Effective Angle of Attack
UP
As discussed earlier, a eff =q −
UT
U T = r + V sin
L =
1
2
1 1
(
cClU cCla U T a eff = cCla qU T2 − U TU P
2
2
2
2
)
24
Some algebra first..
2
( + ) q +
0 tw q
r
+ q + q
L cCla
1 r V sin 1c cos 1s sin
R
2
− (r + V sin )(R + r1s cos − r1c sin + V cos )
2 r
3
r2
q
0 2 2
r + 2V r q 0 sin + q V
0
2
sin 2
+ q tw + 2V q tw sin +
R R
q r V 2 sin 2 + 2 r 2q cos + 2rV q sin cos +
tw R 1c 1c
= cCla V 2q sin 2 cos +
1
2 1c
2 r 2q sin + 2rV q sin 2 + V 2q sin 3
1s 1s 1s
− 2 Rr − V R sin − rV cos − V2 cos sin
− r 1s cos + r 1c sin − rV 1s sin cos + rV 1c sin
2 2 2 2 2
1 2
R
T = Nb
2
0 0
L dr d
Thrust is computed by integrating the lift radially to get
instantaneous thrust force at the hub,
then averaging the thrust force over the entire rotor disk,
and multiplying the force per blade by the number of blades.
2 2 2
= = cosd = 0
2
sin d cos d sin
0 0 0
2
sincosd = 0
0
2 2
= d =
2 2
sin d cos
0 0
27
Result of Azimuthal Integration
q0 2
0q 2 2
r + V
2
2
+ q 2 r + V q r
3 2
1 1
2 0
L d = cCla
R
tw tw
2 R 2
+ rVq1s − Rr
2
q0 2
q
0 2 2
r + V
2
= cCla + q tw 2 + q tw
3 2
1 r V r
2 R 2 R
+ rV (q1s + 1c ) − RrTPP
2
28
Relationship between TPP and
𝛼𝑠 𝛽1𝑐
𝛼𝑇𝑃𝑃 = 𝛼𝑠 + 𝛽1𝑐
𝑉∞ 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼𝑠 + 𝑣 𝑉∞ 𝛼𝑠 + 𝑣
= ≈
𝛺𝑅 𝛺𝑅
𝑉∞ 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 𝑇𝑃𝑃 + 𝑣 𝑉∞ 𝛼 𝑇𝑃𝑃 + 𝑣 𝑉∞ 𝛽1𝑐
𝑇𝑃𝑃 = ≈ =+ 29
𝛺𝑅 𝛺𝑅 𝛺𝑅
Next perform radial integration and
Normalize
R 3
q R 3
q tw 2
q 0 2
+ V R + q tw
0 2 2
+ V R +
1 3 2 4 4
T = Cla N b c
2 R 2
R 3
V q
1s TPP 2 − 2
TPP
2
Cla q 0
3 2 q tw q1s TPP TPP
CT = 1 + +
2 3 2 4
1+ +
2
2
−2
31
Profile Drag
1
D = U T cCd 0
2
r
2
where
D’
U T = r + V sin
P0
C P0 =
(R ) A
Non-dimensionalize: 3
Cd
Final result: C P0 =
8
0
1 + 3
2
34
Induced Drag
L 𝑈𝑇 = Ω𝑟 + 𝑉∞ 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜓
𝑈𝑃 = Ω𝑅𝜆 + 𝑟Ω𝛽1𝑠 cos 𝜓
−𝑟Ω𝛽1𝑐 sin 𝜓 + 𝑉∞ 𝛽 cos 𝜓
a Di
𝑈𝑃 q
𝑈𝑇
Di L
UP 1
(
= cCla qU T − U T U P
UT 2
2 UP
UT
)
1
(
= cCla qU T U P − U P2
2
) 35
Induced Power
2𝜋 𝑅
1
𝑃𝑖 = 𝑁𝑏 න න 𝑈𝑇 𝐷𝑖 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝜓
2𝜋
0 0
𝑣 𝜎𝐶𝑙𝛼 𝜃0 3 2 𝜃𝑡𝑤 2
𝜃1𝑠 ȁ 𝑇𝑃𝑃 𝜆 𝑇𝑃𝑃
𝜆𝑖 = 𝐶𝑇 = 1+ 𝜇 + 1+𝜇 +𝜇 −
Ω𝑅 2 3 2 4 2 2
36
In-Plane Forces
• In addition to thrust that acts normal to the rotor
disk (or along the z-axis in the coordinate
system selected by the user), the blade sections
generate in-plane forces.
• These forces must be integrated to get net force
along the x- axis. This is called the H-force.
• These forces must be integrated to get net
forces along the Y- axis. This is called the Y-
force.
39
Origin of In-Plane Forces
L sin = L
L L
X
One source of in-plane forces is the tilting of the
Thrust due to the blade coning angle.
40
Origin of In-Plane Forces-II
V∞
D=Di+D0
Sectional drag (which is made of inviscid induced drag, and viscous drag)
can give rise to components along the X- direction (H-force), and
Y- direction (Y-Force).
47
Background
• In the previous sections, we developed
expressions for sectional angle of attack,
sectional loads, total thrust, power, etc.
• These equations assumed the blade
flapping dynamics a priori.
• The blade flapping coefficients are
determined by solving the ODE that
covers flapping.
48
Flapping Dynamics
Tip
I + I 2 =
1
cCl (r + V sin )2
rdr
Root
2
49
Solution Process
Assume the blade flapping dynamics equation
Tip 2
Trim Conditions
52
Background
• By trim conditions we mean the operating
conditions of the entire vehicle, including
the main rotor, tail rotor, and the fuselage,
needed to maintain steady level flight.
• The equations are all non-linear, algebraic,
and coupled.
• An iterative procedure is therefore needed.
53
Variation of Control Input &
Pitch Attitude
94
Variation of Control Input &
Pitch Attitude
• The fuselage pitch attitude (α) increases
progressively with forward speed.
• The collective pitch (θo) decreases from its hover
value to a minimum at a moderate forward
speed. This is due to the benefit of translational
velocity component on the lifting capability of the
rotor. The collective pitch then increases with
forward speed.
95
Variation of Control Input &
Pitch Attitude
• The longitudinal cyclic pitch (θ1s) increases with
the forward speed to tilt the rotor forward to
overcome the drag of the helicopter fuselage.
• The lateral cyclic pitch (θ1c) increases gradually
with forward speed to counteract the lateral disc
tilt caused by coning. Actually, an additional
amount of lateral cyclic will be required to
balance the tail rotor thrust.
96
Variation of Total Inflow
98
Variation of Flapping Angles
• The variation in longitudinal cyclic pitch (θ1s)
along with the forward speed effect of the
increased oncoming velocity in the advancing
side and the reduced oncoming velocity in the
retreating side results in a net increase in
longitudinal flapping (β1c) with forward speed.
• The collective flap angle does not show much
variation with forward speed.
99
Variation of Flapping Angles
• The blade coning causes a lateral flapping
response due to dihedral/anhedral effect. This
angle is very small.
101
Flap Response over One Rotor
Revolution
102