Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abaqus 77
Abaqus 77
1-68
Static Stress/Displacement Analyses
1-69
Static Stress/Displacement Analyses
1-70
Static Stress/Displacement Analyses
Listing 1.1.3-2
Material
The elastomeric foam material is defined through the *HYPERFOAM option using experimental test
data. The uniaxial compression and simple shear data whose stress-strain curves are shown in Figure
1.1.4-2 are defined with the *UNIAXIAL TEST DATA and *SIMPLE SHEAR TEST DATA options.
Other available test data options are *BIAXIAL TEST DATA, *PLANAR TEST DATA and
*VOLUMETRIC TEST DATA. The test data are defined in terms of nominal stress and nominal strain
values. ABAQUS performs a nonlinear least-squares fit of the test data to determine the hyperfoam
coefficients ¹i ; ®i ; and ¯i .
Details of the formulation and usage of the hyperfoam model are given in ``Elastomeric foam
behavior,'' Section 10.5.2 of the ABAQUS/Standard User's Manual and Section 9.3.2 of the
ABAQUS/Explicit User's Manual; ``Hyperelastic material behavior,'' Section 4.6.1 of the ABAQUS
Theory Manual; and ``Fitting of hyperelastic and hyperfoam constants,'' Section 4.6.2 of the ABAQUS
Theory Manual. ``Fitting of elastomeric foam test data,'' Section 3.1.5 of the ABAQUS Benchmarks
1-71
Static Stress/Displacement Analyses
Manual, illustrates the fitting of elastomeric foam test data to derive the hyperfoam coefficients.
For the material used in this example, ¯i is zero, since the effective Poisson's ratio, º, is zero, as
specified through the POISSON parameter. The order of the series expansion is chosen to be N = 2
since this fits the test data with sufficient accuracy. N = 2 also provides a more stable model than the
N = 3 case.
The viscoelastic properties in ABAQUS/Standard are specified in terms of a relaxation curve (shown
in Figure 1.1.4-3) of the normalized modulus M (t)=M0 , where M (t) is the shear or bulk modulus as a
function of time and M0 is the instantaneous modulus, as determined from the hyperfoam model. This
requires the use of the TIME=RELAXATION TEST DATA parameter of the *VISCOELASTIC
option. The relaxation data are specified through the *SHEAR TEST DATA option but actually apply
to both shear and bulk moduli when used in conjunction with the hyperfoam model.
ABAQUS/Standard performs a nonlinear least-squares fit of the relaxation data to a Prony series to
determine the coefficients, g Pi , and the relaxation periods, ¿i . A maximum order of NMAX=2 for
fitting the Prony series is used. If creep data are available, the TIME=CREEP TEST DATA parameter
is set to specify normalized creep compliance data. The ABAQUS/Explicit analysis is purely elastic.
A rectangular material orientation is defined for the foam specimen, so stress and strain are reported in
material axes that rotate with the element deformation. This is especially useful when looking at the
stress and strain values in the region of the foam in contact with the punch in the direction normal to
the punch (direction "22").
The rough surface of the punch is modeled by specifying a friction coefficient of 0.80 for the contact
surface interaction through the *FRICTION option under the *SURFACE INTERACTION definition.
Because of the unsymmetric nature of the friction material model, set UNSYMM=YES on the *STEP
option in ABAQUS/Standard.
Case 1
During the first step the punch is displaced downward by a prescribed *BOUNDARY condition,
indenting the foam specimen by a distance of 250 mm. The NLGEOM parameter is specified on the
*STEP option, since the response involves large deformation. In the second step the punch is displaced
back to its original position. Two analyses are performed--one using the *STATIC procedure for both
steps and the other using the *VISCO procedure for both steps.
During a *STATIC step the material behaves purely elastically, using the properties specified with the
hyperfoam model. The *VISCO, *DYNAMIC, or *COUPLED TEMPERATURE-DISPLACEMENT
procedure must be used to activate the viscoelastic behavior. In this case the punch is pushed down in
a period of one second and then moved back up again in one second. The accuracy of the creep
1-72
Static Stress/Displacement Analyses
integration in the *VISCO procedure is controlled by the CETOL parameter and is typically calculated
by dividing an acceptable stress error tolerance by a typical elastic modulus. In this problem, we
estimate a stress error tolerance of about 0.005 MPa and use the initial elastic modulus, E 0 = 2
P
¹i = 0.34, to determine a CETOL of 0.01.
Case 2
This analysis is composed of three steps. The first step is a *VISCO step, where gravity loading is
applied to the point mass of the punch. The gravity loading is ramped up in two seconds, and the step
is run for a total of five seconds to allow the foam to relax fully. In the second step, which is a
*DYNAMIC step, an impulsive load in the form of a half sine wave amplitude with a peak magnitude
of 5000 N is applied to the punch over a period of one second. In the third step (also a *DYNAMIC
step) the punch is allowed to move freely until the vibration is damped out by the viscoelastic foam.
For a dynamic analysis with automatic time stepping, the value of the HAFTOL (half-step residual
tolerance) parameter of the *DYNAMIC procedure controls the accuracy of the time integration. For
systems that have significant energy dissipation, such as this heavily damped model, a relatively high
value of HAFTOL can be chosen. We choose HAFTOL to be 100 times a typical average force that we
estimate (and later confirm from the analysis results) to be on the order of 50 N. Thus, HAFTOL is
5000 N. For the second *DYNAMIC step we set INITIAL=NO to bypass calculation of initial
accelerations at the beginning of the step, since there is no sudden change in load to create a
discontinuity in the accelerations.
1-73
Static Stress/Displacement Analyses
dr
=0
dL
dz r
=
dL 600
ABAQUS/Standard: Case 1
Deformation and contour plots for oriented S22 stress and E22 strain are shown for the viscoelastic
foam in Figure 1.1.4-4. Even though the foam has been subjected to large strains, only moderate
distortions occur because of the zero Poisson's ratio. The maximum (logarithmic) total strain is of the
order of -1.8, which is equivalent to a stretch of ¸ = e-1.8= 0.17, or a nominal compressive strain of
83% indicating severe compression of the foam.
In the viscoelastic case the stresses relax during loading and, consequently, lead to a softer response
than in the purely elastic case, as shown in Figure 1.1.4-5. The force-displacement responses are
shown in Figure 1.1.4-6. The purely elastic material is reversible, while the viscoelastic material shows
hysteresis.
ABAQUS/Standard: Case 2
Various displaced configurations during the Case 2 analysis are shown in Figure 1.1.4-7.
Displacement, velocity, and acceleration histories for the punch are shown in Figure 1.1.4-8. The
displacement is shown to reach a steady value at the stress relaxation stage, followed by a severe drop
due to the impulsive dynamic load. This is followed by a rebound and then finally by a rapid decay of
the subsequent oscillations due to the strong damping provided by the viscoelasticity of the foam.
ABAQUS/Explicit
Figure 1.1.4-9 shows a plot of the initial configurations. Figure 1.1.4-10 shows a contour plot of stress
in the y-direction. Figure 1.1.4-11 shows a contour plot of logarithmic strain in the y-direction at 0.06
seconds when the maximum indentation is reached. The elements underneath the punch are seen to be
subject to large strains. The history of the punch reaction force (reference node 1000) is shown in
Figure 1.1.4-12. A plot of the punch displacement versus the punch reaction force is shown in Figure
1.1.4-13. Because of the purely elastic material behavior, there is no hysteresis and the punch reaction
force in the unloading stage follows the same curve as during loading.
ABAQUS/Design
Figure 1.1.4-14 shows the variation of the normalized sensitivity of CPRESS with respect to the design
1-74
Static Stress/Displacement Analyses
variables L and ¹1 on the contact surface. The sensitivities have been normalized by multiplying with
the value of the design parameter and dividing by the maximum value of CPRESS. Figure 1.1.4-15 and
Figure 1.1.4-16 show the contours of sensitivity of the displacement in the z-direction to the design
paramaters L and ¹1 , respectively. Figure 1.1.4-17 and Figure 1.1.4-18 show the contours of
sensitivity of S22 to the design parameters L and ¹1 , respectively. To provide an independent
assessment of the results provided by ABAQUS, sensitivities were computed using the overall finite
difference (OFD) technique. The central difference method with a perturbation size of 0.1% of the
value of the design parameter was used to obtain the OFD results. Table 1.1.4-1 shows that the
sensitivities computed using ABAQUS compare well with the overall finite difference results.
Input files
indentfoamhemipunch_case1.inp
Case 1 of the ABAQUS/Standard example using test data for both elastic and viscoelastic
properties of the foam, which is statically deformed in two *VISCO steps.
indentfoamhemipunch_case2.inp
Case 2 in which the ABAQUS/Standard analysis is performed in three steps subjecting the punch
to both static and dynamic loading.
hyperfoam_anl.inp
ABAQUS/Explicit analysis using an analytical rigid surface.
hyperfoam.inp
ABAQUS/Explicit model using a faceted rigid surface.
indentfoamhemipunch_dsa.inp
Design sensitivity analysis.
Table
Table 1.1.4-1 Comparison of normalized sensitivities computed using ABAQUS and overall finite
difference.
Normalized³ sensitivity
´ ABAQUS OFD
¹1 dS22 0.5024 0.5018
S22 max d¹1
¡ ¢ max
S22
L
max
dS22
³ dL´ max -0.1134 -0.1107
¹1 du2 -0.0075 -0.0075
umax
2 ¡ d¹ 1
¢ max
L
max
du2
0.2918 0.2922
u2 ³ dL max ´
¹1
CPRESS max
dCPRESS
d¹1
0.5578 0.5582
¡ dCPRESS ¢ max
L
CPRESS max
dL max
0.8012 0.8038
Figures
1-75
Static Stress/Displacement Analyses
1-76
Static Stress/Displacement Analyses
1-77