adgage A208 aa J. KOSAE Vol. 20, No, 4(2004) pp.29~436 Journal of Korean Society for Atmosphere Environment PY ERS ER BUS AR Ate TTI A Study of Desulfation Characteristics of Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion for Domestic Anthracite Bus uss-4 es” Ave yes BA we hy est (200344 108 1191-4, 20044 BE Sel a) Jin-Do Chung*, Jang-Woo Kim and Joon-Ho Ha’’ Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Hoseo Univ. “Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Graduate School, Hoseo Univ. (Received 11 October 2003, accepted S August 2004) Abstract Ci materials with low heating values such as high ash coal and sludges. 1t also has desulfation function by adding limestone directly to combustor. The CFBC has been considered as one of the best processes for low grade coal culating fluidized bed combustion (hereafter CFBC) technology enables an efficient combustion for the containing with large contents of ash and suffur, In this paper, in order to various tests were performed to find the optimum desulfation condition for CFBC using Korean Anthracite. We surveyed possible parameters and conducted desulfation efficiency test in D Thermal Power Plant. In addition, the result of some fundamental theoretical consideration was discussed with CFBC. Optimum limestone size could be considered to be 0.1 ~0.3 mm irrespective of combustion temperature and CWS molar ratio variation Desulfation efficiency increased as the molar ratio increased. Because desulfation process occurs at the surface at higher temperature, inner side of limestone can’t be utilized, When surface area is not appropriate, some SO; emit without reaction. Optimum molar ratio should be decided after considering chemical and physical properties of limestone and coal thoroughly such as particle size, pore size and HGI. Commercial CFBC is operated at Ca/S 1.6. Combustor temperature 840 ~870°C shows good desulfation efficiency. Key Words : Circulating fludized bed combustion (CFBC), Limestone, Desulfation rate, Particle size, Ca/S mole ratio 7 Corresponding author a Tel: +82 (OMI-S40-STAS, Fax +82-(O}E1-S40-S748, E-mail: dchang@ofce oso. kr J. KOSAE Vol. 20, No, 4(2004)0 die dae des a7} fast Abe] zh F-SHS HANS 714 #3) (Fluidization)®} 39), 77AS) So} HA} BAB] ge BHA IzHEe] a BR abele) Be a7} (Fixed Bed)o] eh (HES, 1996; AYA E1994; AEB, 1986), DEES BUA] US Wa7} WSS Bt ASAa MES AGE HLS Combustorell FWA WILE Ae: AS AA at US SWZ) 7ho AVA Pe Avs, 7A Savle) al7} Ba. ge. eat Da Ue SF VBS Ads a Bl zaazsel Fal a Ede We 4. ARSE + Wve UWA}o] 71S. 84} (ABB Combustion Eng. Service Inc., 1996; Power Eng. Inc., 1994). he}4} ¥)a4) $e 3) 3} HE Bo] Etta We Sh Fades daz 4+ ey) ae Et4ss Walle] 7h Ad @ Aes Bed (AEd F, 1991; Yay =, 1990; Kallio, 1998; 2]73F §, 1986). 2 APE ABA Bol ALA Qa aa} Sos, suede E8Hss vl @ tate Gee S > ale Aal4 Vata, Cas Sues}, LEMS 24}. E4sh AAe] AS aml 4a Asse] dae AVS Bt ES AS Szep) AY Ate Hosa. b ea AZ AS franr 2 eee st gel 34, D S}zal+2] CFB Bele) 24- aA) of Sh ASIA FURS Aral Seed 4-& (Maximum: Continuous Rating) 4FeH6) 4 108,300 kg/be®] A2RES ALE % Also} Qov|, CaS Hue oF 1.62 2a] ASAZ Behe} el-bvlas ¢ 0.03; Lele. ah So) FUSS ASIA ARHS Controllers Fail at Ble Halse FelAl7he Weel ae ADV. A FA So AAlse} Qe SO, B47| S74] Sle Ass Fal 22 Ath. CalS B= 0) E402 1.00]2)q B5} Y= SO, Gass} A344 eR AS 22 494 We US OLB > Be. we Cus Boe $a ao} ale} Roe zee. Ast Ra Ae Ue |A) 20-8 Ada BAL SE ANAS Cased oh “ale. WasHe deed, Ae das} avied ap BAL ¥ CaS BIS 16 oe 2gs}o4 As} Wl HES Mol Falato} dae) alse S0,8 414) APE Wels. obehe) Ss} eh ASVAe FA] CaCO FAA} VLA, A BGA IAS WAS SOx ASHE 7h eh. AAMEE ARAe] CFB AA FH Lime 22 FAD F, SOxs} Ws}o} Aa} eek As AS Bel4 FA9} Hho] oF UY Bale, ANAS] GIS SOx al 9A ALG. SEIS AMA) 24) Yo) SAS Bale}, LE Vhs H she Alle alae py ate} ESN oS] BAHL SL Al ES oF MASS TAB, Al (Vell (6). BEIT. S+0,=S0)+296 Kilg + mol «a C204+-10,48 CaSO,+486KI/g + mol (2) ASV5} ols] dal ALS heat eh caco,+so,+1 2 CaSO, +CO; @) CaCO, =Ca0 +CO,-183 KI/g + mol 4) (5) cas0,+-Lo, 50: CaSO, © a3) Ashes) Abas Sa) Teh, 10KeH4] 30 7 DAW, ATA WS SANS ela 40H 2} ASNT] MPSS edehede Epa) aah 2} S79} Sgel ape} 4) 2h0) ae. 3. aa St oe 3.1 HSA SU) paz 7H) Dae] Beles ae ol SHES WN FS] she AS BAB (Combustor) HA} 4 anal FalxtelWIN MES) AORN eet, WR AEE AEE 431 BACK PASS SEC SAI 1 RI S/H i | aa LM« _ Front Wall Fig. 2. Schematic of CF&C boiler applied in this study. Bed Materials} 241So} #8 HESS VIA @ALB.9} Convection Pass ae geen el whe 2 ele EolA] ylytto] 341S}o} Solids Reinjecton System = Fae] Avo] Beso} Feels} See HEDGES GAMMA HLS uo) aly & Fs] AE ALLE (840~890'C) 14 a AES NEG 21)28.89 SOME ARE AF o] ALR DAS) FES Mae S Yet SAE Sudeley FaaN) WBS Te 1s} Beh. wale] We $8 $5 ude Sues a J. KOSAE Vol. 20, No. 4(2004)42 gale dae ee dee 22 FFAelz S42 2OMW, Sage 693Th, AUS] TAL 176 kylem’, FS7}2] Ae B7) SEE SAC}. a Te 7A 7D are ae7] Ute) Sa 8 Aas Aad FBACS. #-=lo] lg Ashe Ja) 12} 7-0) VIZ Ado} Set Al adsl F Selo Bo] Soe Fae. Sele] Ese Bt (Downcommer)& 3 @22. 8? az FIs] TL UAE PMA ee FBHE (Fluidized Bed Heat Exchanger) S871 7484 Be BPs] 37) Paz. SVT ES Sz 14b aed7] I aejol) Be #14} aed7ls Sabet} shedel F 13} shez] SFae|z gy) welch 1a} stay] 9} 29} shed) Ala BREA) shelly} aalstel #571 25S Moles. Sue aae Hei Ne DSS a ee eS AM Gilica BHO Va o}zrh osIE. 2 Aa) 23]4) ope] YASS gajo} HE el} Bab. seas Ye $$4E9] Aes ZB} FS) uipIS} et de At se aa A) G2 Belch. DHS Bale} Woe ASS|= 6misec B= 2 ol} S FER FL FEFE(26~5.1 misecys BA aol te} 2 US| hes U7e] Sa + eh a 2 DI] SRHSS Melo) dalsel Bab 22) Y (Front Wall) & Bs} | SEAT OXIA SHS. AsAe] Bash YH A SFA BWA (Rear Walldol] 2792] eels Fat. as 23} BILL WY] yy SPE SE a MA} BL Cyclones} 3}¥9] dw] =z BE] cue SsohSch. B}2H] Bottom Ashe Z seo) Als 272] Vol ah Marep 79} SHOePE RASS WE els) satel 2} CycloneoH= Vortex Finder? 12) 1¢} $heh ABA SHS 2719) 100% AIA SHAS (Limestone Feed System) & 243! er} 2 ASL ANY AAS, SAA Sa] (Gravimetric Feeder), 2He] WB QR Bests Pyso} get. 2H fe} Absa 71% VelSel) Sha} zhEs esaage) 4208 948, Table 1. Analysis of feed coal. Description Unit Value Proximate Analysis(air dry basis) Moistare Sw 33 Ash Set 390 Volatile Matter wt 40 Fixed Carbon ia. 537 Ful Ratio (air dry basis) ECV. ba UUlimate Analysis (dry bass) Carbon wt 587 Hydrogen mt 03 Niwrogen Fw 02 Sulfur iat os ‘Oxygen wt 38 Ash a 404 Higher Heating Value As fired basis alg 4230 Air dry basis kealg 4330 Dry basis keallkg 44.600 ‘Ash Analysis SiO, io s4s ALO, iow 313 FeO, ew 47 ca ce 13 Meo Siow Lo Ko wt 40 Na,0 si, os Others seu 3 Table 2. Analysis of coal particle size. Particle size Before erase wt) After crusher, wt) Under 0.10 mm 10 10 0.10~L0mm 3 4 10 ~20mm 6 20 2.0 ~30mm 6 7 3.0mm 2] 31 2 £3 Aaya ah SAS So}alet. 3.2 eee dad Ate Supdgos +e T2)4, S74, Daley alg Aebe, eSbale) 1314S $7] Fl ABS AAS eld. ada Ad Avot Ad US 2a Aa Awah ys Shei. Aele) Ae e 7 alse) 4 re ute Ethie] dz Rs 2d % HI 3} Be] WAY sealeh Alwe Abel et as wy SAA 25mm ots HES] BAT (Coal Crusher] 6mm obs wahetsieh RA agGRY ARABS) AORRRIA MeleiolA, BRA AHH: WEE 433 Table 3. Chemical analysis of limestone particles. ‘Table 5. Chemical composition of the used limestone. Composition | Unit Design Resa ‘Composition Fine limestone Coarse fimestone cao, Fam, 900 0 CaCO, 0 0 MgCOs Sew 42 4 MgCO, 34 33 SiO, aw 20 03 SiO, WW W ALO, Got. os 03 ALO, os oa wt 03 03 FeO, 03 03 few os 0 Others 42 43 few 26 54 100 ‘Table 6. Desulfurization by limestone as a function of steed combustion temperature ‘Table 4, Anaya of th une imestone parce ston a =a Sieve Pine limestone ‘Course limestone coe (0.1~ 03mm) (03~05mm me size Specification Distribution Specification Distibution @C)_—‘“® SOx Desulfurization SOx Desulfurization qe 0 omy 1.0mm eal 100% 100% 10086 16 252 52 286 45 a ee ee a a a a i Mel a a os Ws der i@ MS Aes ree er oe eH wo 0 ek ok wi 8 BRS ab 26) EHH SIC. ASA BURL AAG Bel BS AE TAR FY WHS leet] 24 ash 7 E314. 434 USE 0.1~0.3mm B03~OS mms} 27}4] SE Wada Algetsich aa EAE 840~ 890°C] ORbALZ Ure} Lgabsleh. ea aeee As BES 200Mw, Yet FUL tonhr.e|4. Ws 21S £5 3B fal TAS 30~ 00 Woe Hs}, PAIS F Agel Asgtes. Aor), Pas Sada, = ohis Meh. aaeer Aas Ap ge sheel) A dads Satie Ae ot As eg At ASA 24718 Sal se Pe SR A asi] yz} Alo aalsleh ARE SE AAS BAAS 4 as Atel Aalst] BAe Whe SH 45m 718) AAD AAV a B44 Bt. SO, EAS GM31 (219141 HPN 0, HAS LU21 (A719) S, VERS 8) 7p) (ASTM El1-61)o Sle}e] AAA BAO, SURALS SYA] (LECO MAC-400)e4 2}aia4, WAG BAS YHA 7] (Automatic Calorimeter, 146, n LECO)S, Qe BAYS VLY4|7] (Element Analy- ‘er, Perkin Elmer Model 2400). 4131914, 4. a3 3 De SUP Sess Wale] daha a Ve ET VE SE BA RE as aS Ad ARS He oe] 77] ae F S8] FAD AZ AAAY Wat 7), CaS Bu) wse) OE Hal lee Aol HAS at AGS aepstadey 4.1 484 Ax ariel de ee Sa ASV) USS We Wald Eat HES de] ALS DAR AIM ¥ 60) GERI Az] a dats Wat sl CuS eu) Ash] Bailglo)] 4] 8442] Ya} 27)7} 0.3~05 mmol) BoE 0.1~ 03 mma}q Rab) Feb Zee. Meh deh. ae aS AE Ase] B41 a2He Uebila Se J. KOSAE Vol. 20, No. 4(2004)[Fe Coarse Lis) | Fine Ls 7 25 32 36 CalS Ration Fig. 3. Desulfurization rate results depending on lime- stone size and L/S mole ratio. Table 7. Effects of Ca/s mole ratio on desulturiz CoarselS Combust (03~05mm) temp. CSS CO mn SOx Desulfurizaion (opm) ) 6 3S 286 s 270 48 880 6 3 161 o 140 2B 3s 33 au 37 890 22 7 167 68 146 2 AVel ABE ASPl Gals) abet 2s dep gach 23} 32 48142) laa7|s} Cus Bele ah = hrs deat AS Avo} Ved ais 2351442) 9-7] Vile Geshe} A¥sigion}, aay] Bae 200MW, ALA) 124 (AP) = 1610mmH,O hgh 2 : Ge 94 Towhr, A Fe VPS 0.5%, ANE WARE 4,884 kealhkgoe BY vighe}. Limestones] FAS CaCO, (LF 90% 9) Aho] Am $9) Sulfurs} ybSa}o] As -yAdeep. 24 spo Ake 51a} 2} 23) wpe BAS VABH} oll uP FAS sey Se] MP2s UE WIA BAAS BAAS. 2 ae Be] Basicieks Beles ASS SHE AY] ous Ae 7S YS EVAS ast vee SES) US 7] Ae HS els spe] QS4 aa a Ae ach ah}) 4s) aie aos ashe Aa U BIS Hl ABS Peele Zee aa abba He Aol Gales s see Seal He ewe, AA SV 0.2~03 pms et USE ASACY alse MeCOe BaeH) 3 AL toate dalek das ujollay MgCO,7+ MoOz Ht Seb 1S SHAE ANS $8 ah. AR) apse che Leal sypelae ae Rep HS] Suh AL ALO SIs) aa dag eS o. MERA] Sal7} Qh PL-SPs CaSO,2 2) Aes aye] ae Bshts-B7] Aad Ue AVAL ple Fo ByAow AL v} WS 71S WHE] Bol Ue HME ASF Aol 1S. SURES eels] AFL O.1~ 03mm A=) Yo] APR wow Vejq ge. O.1mm she Bybss}] Lab A Fly AshZ wi #401 04mm 122 WME I 4 ge ae Aol Ae} Bee] Yeh. 0.1~ 03mm Bes] S412 294 Oe) y 71g Hoe Ge} RES ASAD, HES appol Asbehe AH VM A Pts] Aslzte] dela dsb | ed Be E+ alate 4.2 Ca/S BHloll HE wet S18 WAL AVR Ashe 37s} 291 50 HER} Uh 2H SE 880°C, CalS Su] 1.60} PP ASAE GHe 52%, 4 ASP WHE 45S UEHHD Uo. ws SviSS BES AS Bests. 5, CwS Fy] S84 APF 75%, 73%2) WHEE Geb we. a a shi) dehd Wag Ses sl Aaqo) dake 7% Fe Ashes} saab) Selb aves: WHEE Bethe WE Bel Ft eh ES) FAP & PARP) HS 1B2] Deo] Gaswe. gd Ba} LARVA] OGRE 100%S. 7A a) Fo} a 32) $a REE BF Ais] Mave ole Bose AAV Sul} V/15] wl&ol Molop Me, eH, Aa) 3 del9] epye aa aby Soll WASH SO,2} 43]4 seh Ahe]oHAl o]so}, ase As4 Wate 18d + om, Eat ae] AAS HabgMale] BREE BE oes} SO, 7-4FO AAAS) RERRENA elelOlAd Bea HPT AE 435 830 $$ Eine geanrey Fine t3 (800°C) el “F Goarse 15 (880°C) Coane LSi890°C) Tees gk pene en Spee 9) Cu Ration Fig. 4. SO, gas concentration of a variation of Ca/S mole ratio YE LPP So} 100%) does ae 4 Me. ep] BMS S7} AA Fa v]Al Ss Al RAE SO; Gass} US F VE ANAS as} Allo] PSHE Sb |71Al Fe ele. = CFBC BUA CaS Be) S 1.6 YESS Aslon, G2F2] HPS CaS Be S714) Aa elle AS SF Ue We Asay Use FA Bere AL Bale] ARsS A sHi7i= Selo] Foe ese] Pee Bue as Sev] 1 ASIA Wat 71, 71s, BAA Bay ast sey de Bt Aste] Sgol) ae} FAS) Se] dest cbse] a4] gad ade =e BK Ao] Hat SA azbe shop deh. 4.3 Seva GE easy edes| dstee washda Aye ash SE 8o] UEbE AAR) 840°C] 739] GEES Bele on), sc £28 BES wate] dpelgleh. rehy 870°Col49} wae: T8%, 880°C] 4 8%, 890°C A 61% UENAS Th &, 840~ 870°C NAS) USES BolT 274, 2 FAS 870°CHA 3S) HPSS YEE WZ Ut. ole] CaS BS 2.7 elon, 43)4 BEV 0.1~0.3mm o]gtey. FSS WAS) Bbspee SEs SI UPH adda. BUS AALS 700°C a, 7-4 ‘Table 8. Desultation rate variation by temperature change. ‘Temperature ?C)—__SOs(ppm) __Desulfation ste (%) 40 ut 7B 850 132 4 860 n n 870 us 8 880 168 6 390 202 1 85 g 575 5 2s & 3s a eT “Temperature(*C) Fig. 5. Desulfation rate of as a variation of temperature. FRAT TASS 840~870°Co] 4 FAS] NS SFE. 2/49] Cede WSs] Bret th bS-te] Aslshe ole BSHTe) s}s}o} q) Ab eiol) Qh Baga BALWORA WARE ab sts} Fle} =} o}-22] Sulfation (3}4+-8)e) 7} ces} SP}, SO.7} AbS}SJe}] SO,8 WASTE ZH HB] 870°C oe] Qed ALS] wheel eh. ay 5 Seal be Wee deh. oe a Hse] CaCO, 1 AA YP THFAS Ve 2 AMsh: E82 FES Wales) Sala B52E Des] VS SH We ae] 7) 2h % 53] Saat aztel 434 at I gl Cus £4) she] FAS Fat deg lat a FRE} Ue Wee ase 1. ASIA ab lol Ee Sa Ho ea ABA USE Washi AVE aah abes J. KOSAB Vol. 20, No, 4(2004)4300 gals alae SHER 3 Cas Bu} alo} Balele) Ase} alah 271 7} 03~0Smm Be} = 0.1~03 mmol} aR) Bp 4 2719 shho2 G2 ase] ISNT ES appol abBeHE ALE abla he] Be Ante) Qo} GLE) FH Bee yes By 2.CalS Bua) He GE HoH slo Se washer AVE Ash 2IL= 2 AIA) Qa 27) Sex lahesh Abate) eh Srl GES Aseigte. & CBC BMellAE Cus BS 16 Yes Las, aoe) GES Cus 80) S71 oH woe Ae a + sae 2.AS Behe Feld Agape ale wal a] ARSE Ashe ale] Jee a ae Qo) BAR BS aA] AVA) Vay BASS, LASS BA VSP HP Aa 2 Aste] go we} AAS} ge) -Aebsp ob ee} a4 224 2A SSehe Ao] ee Bae dt 2 HSI 4. 840°CA] 73%9] WHEL volw gleml, & ES SES Tbe] JSshahen}, 870°C} 8%2) BAS EHH 9.01}, 880°C} 68%, 890°C GIGE HEHE. %, 840~870°CAH Al AIS] WS SS Molst levi, =1 Zosds 870 °col HS] WES Gebyar Dep VIANA Ba A HOLE 14, Cm, G71 19D), HE HES AA O1A)2} Freeboard 2s 5-9", Q5es}ehse}sI2), 28,5), 568-575. ASA O84, Mod, Fs, Gaal EAL Va, ad F991), ABA Hee Vale MEPIS a] P SRRES 71e UD", SAL HI AV MAK VEE AS, 11, HAI (1994), FA) SUES RIA, aaa I-18. AV, G4}, VEAL, aa, 242 (1986), Beh HL ude] wats st Sees le 7h yay, Seay, 140. FE2(1996),“Fahe}e 127] wale) al DUT a SAA, 1-177. ABB Combustion Engineering Service, Inc, (1996),"CFB Boiler Design & Operation Manus, Inspection and Maintenance Manval”. Grace, Z.R (1995), "Circulating Fludized Bed”, British Columbia, 40-241 Kallio, (1998), “A 15D Qualitative Study of the Effect of Solids Inventory and Air Distribution on the Voi- age Profile in a CFB Rise", Abo Akademi Power Engineering, Inc, (1994), “The Design and Commercial Development of 150 MW CFBC Unit for Texas~ New Mexico Power Company”, Power Engineering, Ine. (1996), “Power 96 Inter- national Conference Papers”, Book Ill, 83-90.