See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/344876325

Analysis of residential building with STAAD. Pro & ETABS

Article  in  Materials Today: Proceedings · October 2020

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.329

CITATIONS READS

3 5,616

4 authors, including:

Lingeshwaran Nagarathinam Hamim Jeelani Syed

K L University K L University
40 PUBLICATIONS   67 CITATIONS    13 PUBLICATIONS   7 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Analytical study of buckling frames by using staad pro and ETABS View project

Experimental Analysis of Seismic Performance on bed Joint Reinforced Solid Brick Masonry Walls – a State of the Art View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Hamim Jeelani Syed on 25 October 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Materials Today: Proceedings

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/matpr

Analysis of residential building with STAAD. Pro & ETABS

K. Surender Kumar a, N. Lingeshwaran b, Syed Hamim Jeelani b
a
PG Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation (Deemed to be University), Vaddeswaram, AP, India
b
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation (Deemed to be University), Vaddeswaram, AP, India

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: A building that overlooks multiple floors is a multi-story structure. The multi-story buildings are
Received 3 July 2020 designed to increase the building’s floor area without raising the land area and saving money. In these
Received in revised form 7 August 2020 modern days the Buildings are made to fulfill our basic aspects and better Serviceability. It is not an issue
Accepted 12 August 2020
to construct a building any how its, important to construct an efficient building which will serve for many
Available online xxxx
years without showing any failure. In this paper aims to finding better analysis for creating load case,
applying load combinations, support reactions & reinforcement of column and beam etc. Then reviewing
Keywords:
(whether beam or column passed in the loads or failed). This complete design analysis is the case study of
STAAD Pro
ETABS
ongoing building project in Hyderabad and standard code books (IS 456: 2000, SP 16) are used for the
Reviewing the design check building analysis.
Structural detailing Ó 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Failure of column & beams Selection and Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Confer-
ence on Future Generation Functional Materials and Research 2020

1. Introduction
This paper presents the design verification for Proposed G + 8
RCC Building For General Commercial Apartment at Hyderabad,
Telangana as per the relevant codes and standards. The dimension
of the structure is 12.5 m * 8.3 m and its shown in Figs. 1 and 2.
The concrete structure is designed and analysed using Limit
state design philosophy as per IS 456:2000 on ETABS 2017,
Staad.Pro and is used for the analysis and design of the structure
[1]. This Design verification of this paper describes the methodol-
ogy for structural analysis and design to satisfy functional require-
ments and ensure structural integrity of the structure as envisaged
in the applicable safety standards [2]. The scope of this paper is to
describe the structures functional requirements, loads and load
combinations, material properties and methodology used for anal-
ysis and design of structure. This paper summarizes the results of
the analysis and design of G + 8 in Staad.Pro & ETABS 2017. In order
to develop technique and creativity in Analysis and designing here
investigated a live project located in Hyderabad [3]. The Building
which is chosen here is an apartment of plot area 190 square yards
was undertaken by IVRCL Ltd. Building information states that it is
G + 8 storey building, base area is about 150 square yards with
total height of 32.0 m and floor to floor clear height is 4.00 m for
all floors. The building consists of two lifts and two main stairs
while terrace floor included overhead water tank and lift room
[4]. Among these the cellar is provided with retaining wall. For
the part of drafting floor plans, of AUTO CAD undergone in the
investigation. After fixing floor plan, structural framing is followed
by defining cross-section for columns, beams [5]. On basis of sup-
port conditions and dimensions slabs are adopted, analysed these
beams, columns and slabs by using STAAD. Pro and ETABS.
2. Codes and standards
These are the applicable codes and standards for the analysis,
design of Proposed G + 8 RCC Building For General Commercial
Apartment At Hyderabad, Telangana.
 IS 456: 2000 - Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced
Concrete.
 IS 875 (Part 1) 1987, Code of Practice for Design Loads (other
than Earthquake) for buildings & structures - Dead loads.
 IS 875 (Part 2) 1987, Code of practice for Design Loads (other
than earthquake) for buildings & structures - Imposed Loads.
 IS 875 (Part-3) 2015, Code of practice for Design Loads (other
than earthquakes) for buildings & structures - Wind loads.
 IS 1893 (Part-1) 2016 Criteria for Earthquake resistant design
of structures: General provisions and buildings.
 IS 1786:2008 - High Strength Deformed Steel Bars and Wires for
Concrete Reinforcement specification.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.329
2214-7853/Ó 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Future Generation Functional Materials and Research 2020

Please cite this article as: K. Surender Kumar, N. Lingeshwaran and S. Hamim Jeelani, Analysis of residential building with STAAD. Pro & ETABS, Materials
Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.329
K. Surender Kumar, N. Lingeshwaran and S. Hamim Jeelani
Fig. 1. Stilt Floor Plan.
3. Structural layout
The basic structure description and layout of Proposed G + 8
RCC Building shown in Figs. 2–5 for General Commercial Apart-
ment at Hyderabad, Telangana as per the IS CODE standards. Basic
structure description and building accessories are listed in Table 1.
4. Loads and combinations
The design loads shall be calculated as described in the follow-
ing sections. Dead load consists of self-weight of various structural
elements indicated in the Table 2.
Live loads are gravity loads produced by the use and occupancy
of the building or the structures. This include the weight of all
2
Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
movable loads such as personal, tools miscellaneous equipment,
movable partitions, storage material etc. Live loads considered in
the structure as per IS 875 Part 2 Code are tabulated in Table 3
5. Earthquake loads
The loads due to Earthquake are generated by the response of
the structure to design spectrum as specified in IS 1893 (Part 1)
2016. The building site is located in Earthquake Zone III and seis-
mic zone factors corresponding to that zone are adopted in calcu-
lation of response. The masses considered in the structure,
generating the earthquake loads are due to dead weight of perma-
nent construction, 50% live load on the structure and its tabulated
in Table 4.
K. Surender Kumar, N. Lingeshwaran and S. Hamim Jeelani Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx

Fig. 2. Centre line.

6. Wind loads 7. Load combinations

The loads due to wind are calculated as per the provisions
specified in IS 875 (Part 3).Wind load parameters are given in
Table 5, Design Wind pressure is calculated as: Pd = -
kd  ka  kc  0.6 V2z , The internal pressure coefficient consid-
ered, Cpi = +/ 0.5
Structure has to be designed for both strength and serviceability
criteria. For the strength design, load combinations as specified in
IS 456–2000 shall be used. For ascertaining safety under service
load conditions the un-factored load combinations as specified in
IS Code shall be used. These combinations are primarily framed

3
K. Surender Kumar, N. Lingeshwaran and S. Hamim Jeelani Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx

Fig. 3. Plan View and 3D view in ETABS.

Fig. 4. Column layout in ETABS. Fig. 5. Column layout in Staad.Pro.

4
K. Surender Kumar, N. Lingeshwaran and S. Hamim Jeelani Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx

Table 1 Table 5
Structure Description (Staad.Pro & ETABS). Wind Load Parameters (Staad.Pro & ETABS).
SI. No DESCRIPTION DETAILS Parameters
1 Length * Width 12.5 m * 8.3 m Regional basic wind 50 m/s
2 Height 32 m Terrain Category 1
Risk Coefficient, K1 1.0
Terrain, Height and Structure size factor, K2 As per building height
Topography factor, K3 1.0
Importance factor for Cyclonic region K4 1.0
Directionality factor, Kd 0.9
Table 2 Area Averaging Factor, Ka 0.9
Dead Loads (Staad.Pro & ETABS). Combination Factor, Kc 0.9
Design life of the building 50
SI. No ITEMS WEIGHT
Percentage of openings in the building 5–20%
1 Self-weight factor 1.0
2 Slab load Including Floor Finish 1.5 kN/m2
4 Wall load (4 m height wall) 14 kN/m
5 Wall load (1 m height wall) - Parapet 2.4 kN/m Table 6
6 Stair case 22 kN/m Load Combinations (Staad.Pro & ETABS).

Load Combinations
STRENGTH DESIGN SERVICEABILITY DESIGN
1. 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL 1. 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL
Table 3 2. 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 WL/EL 2. 1.0 DL + 0.8 LL + 0.8 WL/EL
Live Loads (Staad.Pro & ETABS). 3. 1.5 DL + 1.5 WL/EL 3. 1.0 DL + 1.0 WL/EL
4. 0.9 DL + 1.5 WL/EL
SI. No ITEMS WEIGHT
Abbreviations: DL = Dead Load, LL = Live Load, WL = Wind Load, EL = Earthquake
1 Live load (G + 8) all the slabs 3.0 kN/m
Load.
2 Roof Live 3.0, 2.0 kN/m

8. Results and discussion

Table 4
Since the investigation gone through alive project, in details of
Earthquake Loads (Staad.Pro & ETABS).
conclusion the analysis and designing of structural members are
Zone Zone Importance Response Reduction Damping similar either ETABS or Staad.Pro. Whereas the inputs analysis
Factor Factor Factor Ratio and designing is same the results are obtained and the values of
III 0.16 1.5 5 0.05 Shear force, Bending moment for both ETABS & Staad.Pro shown
in Figs. 6–9.

for serviceability condition requirements such as member local 9. Conclusion

deflections and overall structural deflection checks. Various load
combinations as per the partial safety factors given in IS 456– Calculation by both software gives almost same result. As the 8-
2000 are listed below for strength and serviceability criteria and storey building has similar floors ETABS and STAAD. Pro is the per-
its shown in the Table 6. fect software which can be adopted for analysis. Usage of ETABS

5
K. Surender Kumar, N. Lingeshwaran and S. Hamim Jeelani Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx

Fig. 6. Shear Force Diagram in ETABS.

Fig. 7. Bending Moment Diagram in ETABS.

6
K. Surender Kumar, N. Lingeshwaran and S. Hamim Jeelani
Fig. 8. Shear Force Diagram in Staad.Pro.
and STAAD. Pro software minimizes the time required for analysis
and design.
Author contribution
K. Surender Kumar, N. Lingeshwaran conceived the idea. K.
Surender Kumar, N. Lingeshwaran has done the analytical part
and discussed the results. The language correction, proper discus-
sion of results, and manuscript formatting was done by N. Lingesh-
waran. All authors of the article provided substantive comments.
7
Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Fig. 9. Bending Moment Diagram in Staad.Pro.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing finan-
cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared
to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
[1] P. Harihara Venkata Nagasai V, Bhargav Reddy Ramakrishna Kolli, N.
Lingeshwaran. ‘‘Comparison Between Seismic and Non-seismic Analysis of
Multi-storey Building”, International conference advances in Civil Engineering
K. Surender Kumar, N. Lingeshwaran and S. Hamim Jeelani
(ICACE- 2019), 21-23 March 2019, Department of Civil Engineering, K L
University, Andhra Pradesh, India.
[2] N. Lingeshwaran, P. Poluraju, ‘‘Analytical study on seismic performance of bed
joint reinforced solid brick masonry walls”, Materials Today : Proceedings,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.528.
[3] M. Rajesh Reddy, Dr. N. Srujana, N. Lingeshwaran, ‘‘Effect of Base Isolation in
Multi-storeyed Reinforced Concrete Building”, International Journal of Civil
Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2017.
View publication stats
Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
[4] Rama Krishna Kolli, Lingeshwaran N, (2019), Experimental Investigation and
Analysis of Shear Walls, International Journal of Recent Technology and
Engineering, Vol. 7, Issue – 6C2, pp. 225 – 229, DOI: ijrte.org/wp-content/
uploads/papers/v7i6c2/F10420476C219.pdf.
[5] V.V.L. Dinesh Sai, N. Lingeshwaran (2019), Experimental Investigation on
reinforced masonry walls under axial load, International Journal of Recent
Technology and Engineering, Vol. 7, Issue – 6C2, pp. 225 – 229, DOI: ijrte.org/
wpcontent/uploads/papers/v7i6c2/F10430476C219.pdf.