You are on page 1of 11

JOURNAL OF THE Vol. 40, No.

5
WORLD AQUACULTURE SOCIETY October, 2009

Parentage Determination and Effective Population Size Estimation


in Mass Spawning Pacific Oyster, Crassostrea gigas, Based
on Microsatellite Analysis
Ronghua Li, Qi L1 , and Ruihai Yu
Fisheries College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China

Abstract
Seven high polymorphic microsatellite loci were used to determine the pedigrees in a mass spawning
of Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, and to estimate the genetic variability between broodstock and
offspring. Parental assignment was performed on a total of 155 individuals, including 141 offspring,
8 candidate mothers, and 6 candidate fathers. The assignment results of real offspring were generally
in agreement with simulation with a success rate over 99% using only six of these loci. The
allelic diversity and observed heterozygosity (Ho ) exhibited similarity between parents and offspring
populations, but the expected heterozygosity (He ) had a significant decrease in offspring. Although all
the males and females contributed to the next generation, the variances of reproductive success and
unequal sex ratio resulted in a decline in effective population size (Ne = 11.42). The inbreeding rate
of this small-scale, mass spawning population was estimated at approximately 16.5% per generation.
This gave us an insight that when designing breeding programs based on mass spawning for future
oyster cultivation generations, the higher inbreeding and lower effective population size should be
considered.

The high fecundity and survival rate of some in black and red sea bream (Taniguchi et al.
aquaculture organisms in a culture environment 1983; Sugama et al. 1988), and 57% less in
ensure that a small number of stocks are used Japanese flounder (Hara and Sekino 2003).
for production. The restricted number of breed- The effective number of breeders or the
ing individuals used in aquaculture operations effective population size (Ne ) is affected by sev-
can lead to random drift in gene frequencies eral factors such as a small number of breeders,
between generations (Hedgecock and Sly 1990) unequal sex ratios, unequal contribution of par-
and a loss of genetic variability in a population ents, and family size variations (Lannan 1980;
(Primack 1998). Gaffney and Scott 1984; Gall 1987; Hedgecock
Reductions in genetic variation showed nega- and Sly 1990; Gaffney et al. 1992; Hedrick
tive effect on the commercially important traits 2000; Koljonen et al. 2002). Ne is also essential
such as growth rate and fitness in some aquatic information to evaluate the rate of inbreeding
animals (Koehn et al. 1988; Danzmann et al. (Gall 1987). The high inbreeding rate will pro-
1989). The hatchery-produced juveniles tend duce negative effects such as the expression of
to have reduced genetic variability, measured lethal or lower fitness recessive genes caused
as number of alleles and heterozygosity, when by increased homozygosity, inbreeding depres-
compared with wild or broodstock populations, sion, and reduction of genetic variance (Fal-
because of the small effective number of par- coner 1989). Pedigree tracing technique allows
ents (Allendorf and Phelps 1980; Ryman and the direct quantification of Ne in hatcheries with
Stahl 1980; Cross and King 1983). Increasing random mating (Perez-Enriquez et al. 1999).
the effective number of the broodstock is an Because of their high level of polymorphism
effort to prevent the reduction of genetic diver- and codominant characterization, microsatellite
sity. However, the effective number of parents markers have been acknowledged as an efficient
was 30% less than the actual number of broods tool for examining pedigree structure of hatch-
ery populations (Herbinger et al. 1995; Norris
1 Corresponding author. et al. 2000; Sekino et al. 2003).
© Copyright by the World Aquaculture Society 2009

667
668 LI ET AL.

The Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, sup- DNA Extraction and Microsatellite Analysis
ports an important molluscan aquaculture indus- Genomic DNA was extracted from adduc-
try along the coastal areas of China. The pro- tor muscle of parental oysters and whole D-
duction of oysters reached 3.82 × 106 metric larvae. DNA was isolated from adductor mus-
tons in 2004 in China, accounting for 33.1% cle of the individual broodstock following Li
of total marine molluscan yield (Department of et al. (2006). Larval DNA was prepared by the
Fisheries 2005). The Pacific oyster accounts for Chelex-modification extraction method as pre-
about one-third of the total oyster production. viously described by Li et al. (2003).
In China, the Pacific oyster seeds are pro- Seven microsatellite markers: L10, L48
duced exclusively in hatcheries by mass spawn- (Huvet et al. 2000), Cg49, Cg108 (Magoulas
ing. Because of the high fecundity of this et al. 1998), ucdCg10, ucdCg14, and cmrCg143
species, relatively few parents are required (McGoldrick et al. 2000) were selected for
to generate sufficient offspring without con- genotyping all parental oysters and offspring
cerns that genetic variability would decrease based on their level of heterozygosity and
in farmed populations. To avoid genetic degen- genotyping reliability. Polymerase chain reac-
eration in hatchery-produced seed, maintaining tions (PCRs) were performed using 10 μL vol-
effective population size and avoiding inbreed- umes of 0.25 U Taq DNA polymerase (Takara,
ing are a couple of measures generally recom- Japan), 1 × PCR buffer, 0.2 mM dNTP mix,
mended. Thus, the knowledge of the pedigree 1 μM of each primer set, 1–2 mM MgCl2 , and
structure and the size of the broodstock that is about 100 ng template DNA for parental oys-
effectively contributing to the next generation ters (1 μL of total DNA extracted for larvae).
are of particular importance. The PCR cycling conditions for all loci of
This study was conducted to assess the abil- broodstock were performed as follows: 3 min
ity of microsatellites DNA markers in parent- at 94 C; 35 cycles of 1 min at 94 C, optimal
age assignment of mass spawn-produced Pacific annealing temperature (55–62 C) for 1 min,
oyster, and the consequence of individual repro- 72 C for 1 min per cycle; followed by a final
duction success on effective population size extension at 72 C for 5 min. In order to improve
and inbreeding rate are discussed. In addition, the amplifications from larvae, 40 PCR cycles
the difference in genetic variability between were run for all loci: 3 min at 95 C followed
broodstock and offspring generations was esti- by seven cycles of 1 min at 94 C, 30 sec at the
mated. annealing temperature, and 30 sec at 72 C, fol-
lowed by 33 cycles of 30 sec at 94 C, 30 sec
at annealing temperature, 30 sec at 72 C, with
a final extension of 5 min at 72 C. Amplifica-
Materials and Methods
tion products were resolved via 6% denaturing
Broodstock and Offspring polyacrylamide gel and visualized by silver-
staining. A 10-bp DNA ladder (Invitrogen, Inc.,
The broodstock of 2-yr-old C. gigas was Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used as a reference
collected from a local oyster farm and con- marker for allele size determination. To avoid
ditioned for 2 wk before spawning at Haili inaccuracy in scoring because of the differ-
Hatchery, Shandong Province, China. In May ences in gels, two control DNA samples were
2006, six males and eight females were ran- included in each set of samples for each gel.
domly selected from the broodstock population
and synchronously induced to spawn through Statistical Analysis
stimulations of air exposure and warmed seawa- The simulation program of CERVUS v. 2.0
ter. Twenty-four hours after fertilization, sam- (Marshall et al. 1998) was first used to estimate
ples of D-larvae were collected and preserved the efficiency and the number of loci needed
in 100% ethanol at 4 C. for unambiguous parentage assignment of the
PARENTAGE AND EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATION IN OYSTER 669

oyster. Simulations were based on hypothetical typing error rate of 1% was used, and assign-
parent and offspring genotypes that were cre- ment to parents was performed in a two-step
ated using allele frequency information from analysis from a pool of candidate sire and dam
the seven microsatellite loci (Li et al. 2006). data. Because all possible parental genotypes
Parental genotypes were generated assuming were known, it was implied that a genetic mis-
Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and no match between offspring and the known parent
linkage between loci. Progeny genotypes were genotype was because of either miss scoring or
generated from all parental male and female mutation. Cumulative assignment success was
genotypes assuming no mutation or transmis- also evaluated based on parent and offspring
sion error between parents and their progeny. genotypes.
This program calculates the likelihood ratios Because of the likelihood of genotyping
for paternity/maternity inference and defines errors, we used another program PAPA v. 2.0
a statistic  as the difference in log likeli- (Duchesne et al. 2002) that has an algorithm
hood ratios (LOD score) between the two most- that can account for genotyping errors to per-
likely parents. Then, when working with real form a parental pair allocation and compared
data, each descendant is assigned to the most- between the programs.
likely parent (maximum LOD with significant Levels of genetic variation for broodstock
 value). and offspring populations were assessed, as the
The polymorphic information content (PIC) number of alleles per locus, expected heterozy-
and two exclusion power for every locus were gosity (He ), and observed heterozygosity (Ho )
also calculated by this program. The power of were calculated using CERVUS 2.0 (Marshall
each locus and the combined probability over et al. 1998). All correctly allocated offspring
loci to exclude a false candidate parent knowing were included in this and in the subsequent
only the genotypes of the offspring was termed analyses. Significance was tested using the
as Excl 1 probability, and that one additionally Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test (Zar
knowing the genotype of one parent was termed 1999) implemented with SPSS v. 14.0 software
as Excl 2 probability. The combined probability (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
of exclusion over loci was conducted by adding Parental contributions to reproduction were
loci from the most informative to the least infor- represented by male/female reproductive suc-
mative one according to their PIC values. Exact cess, which was calculated for each male/female
tests for conformance to HWE and linkage as the proportion of offspring from a single
disequilibrium at each locus were performed spawning sired or dammed by that male/female.
using the program GENEPOP v. 3.4 (Raymond Chi-square analyses implemented with SPSS v.
and Rousset 1995) to obtain precise theoretical 14.0 were used to test for the differences in
power of exclusion. The sequential Bonferroni male/female reproductive success.
correction was used for multiple tests across As an estimator of male sperm competi-
loci (Rice 1989). MICRO-CHECKER v. 2.2.3 tion, the genetically effective paternity fre-
(http://www.microchecker.hull.ac.uk/) assessed quency was calculated following
 Bekkevold
the probability of null alleles at each of the et al. (2002) as EPF = 1/ pi2 , where pi is
seven microsatellite loci. the proportion of offspring sired by male “i” in
Parentage analysis was conducted using the a given clutch. The same formula was also used
likelihood-based approach in CERVUS v. 2.0. to compute the genetically effective maternity
The critical  score calculated by the sim- frequency (EMF).
ulation module was used here to assign the The effective population size was first cal-
offspring to the most-likely candidate parent. culated for unequal sex ratio after Crow and
The parameters for this simulation run were Kimura (1970) as: Ne = 4Nm Nf /(Nm + Nf ),
as follows: 10,000 replication cycles, a pool where Nm and Nf are actual number of males
of 14 candidate parents, 100% of the candi- and females. Then the Ne was recalculated
date parents sampled and genotyped, a default based on the differences in reproductive success
670 LI ET AL.

Table 1. Numbers of alleles (k), polymorphic where ci is the fractional contribution of each
information content (PIC), and probabilities of exclusion parent, cm is the average fractional contribu-
based either on genotype of no parent known (Excl 1) or
one parent known (Excl 2) for the seven microsatellite loci
tion of males, 1/(2Cm ), and cf is the average
analyzed in the present work. fractional contribution of females, 1/(2Cf ).

Locus k PIC Excl (1) Excl (2)


Results
Cg49 29 0.952 0.831 0.907
cmrCg143 17 0.888 0.656 0.792 Computer Simulations
Cg108 27 0.952 0.829 0.907
ucdCg14 38 0.950 0.826 0.904 Summary statistics for the seven markers
ucdCg10 22 0.936 0.780 0.876 used in the simulations of the hypothetical oys-
L10 46 0.971 0.894 0.944 ter breeding population are given in Table 1.
L48 32 0.951 0.828 0.906
The allele number of these loci ranged from a
Average 30.1 0.943 0.806 0.891
minimum of 17 for cmrCg143 to a maximum
of 46 for L10 with an average of 30.1 and the
mean PIC of 0.943. The large variability exhib-
of individuals, where Nem and Nef are the ited by the seven microsatellite loci analyzed
effective number of males and females, respec- leads to a high power for parentage assignment.
tively. Nem and Nef were estimated follow- Probabilities of exclusion per locus ranged from
ing Lande and Barrowclough (1987), Nem = 0.656 to 0.894 when only information of off-
(Nm k m − 1)/[k m + (σ 2km /k m ) − 1], where Nm spring was available (Excl 1) and from 0.792
is the actual number of males; k m is the average to 0.944 when one parent was known (Excl 2).
number of offspring sired by an individual male Combined assignment success of the seven
and σ 2km is the variance of km . The same for- loci in the hypothetical population with a two-
mula was used to compute the effective number step analysis was calculated by adding loci from
of females. the most informative to the least informative
The rate of inbreeding, F , was calculated one according to their PIC value (Fig. 1).
by Brown et al. (2005) after using the following Simulations showed that four loci were required
formula: to assign 90% of progeny to both parents and
1  2 1 1 five loci to assign 99%. The total assignment
F = c − (cm )2 − (cf )2 (1) success would be over 99% if the loci were up
2 parents i 4 4
to six.

1.2
0.99 1.00 1.00
Assignment success rates

1.0 0.90
0.98 1.00 1.00
0.8 0.88
0.61
0.6
0.45
0.4 simulation data
real data
0.2
0.03
0 0.07
0
L10 Cg49 Cg108 L48 Cg14 Cg10 Cg143
Loci added

Figure 1. Cumulative assignment success rates by CERVUS v. 2.0 of 10,000 simulated offspring to their 14 hypothetical
candidate parents and real genotype date sampled in a strict level of 95% confidence interval, adding loci from the most
to the least PIC one.
PARENTAGE AND EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATION IN OYSTER 671

Table 2. Genetic variability of the broodstock and offspring of Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas.

Locus

Population Cg49 cmrCg143 Cg108 ucdCg14 ucdCg10 L10 L48 Mean

Broodstock
Sample size 14 14 14 14 14 14 14
Alleles range (bp) 132–182 140–162 122–174 198–232 150–234 114–214 90–172
No. of alleles 14 11 14 10 15 15 14 13.3
Expected heterozygosity 0.929 0.918 0.937 0.897 0.947 0.950 0.937 0.931
(He )
Observed heterozygosity 0.857 0.714 0.929 0.357 0.357 1.000 0.857 0.724
(Ho )
Offspring
Sample size 128 129 128 110 127 124 136
Alleles range (bp) 132–182 140–162 122–174 198–232 150–234 114–214 90–172
No. of alleles 14 11 14 10 15 15 14 13.3
Expected heterozygosity 0.901 0.857 0.868 0.882 0.915 0.903 0.915 0.892
(He )
Observed heterozygosity 0.945 0.853 0.922 0.664 0.638 0.935 0.934 0.842
(Ho )

Analyses from MICRO-CHECKER showed of parental pair allocation from PAPA v. 2.0
probable evidence of null alleles (general excess were in accordance with the two-step method
of homozygotes) at ucdCg10, ucdCg14, and from CERVUS v. 2.0 with seven loci.
cmrCg143, but no evidence of “stutter peaks” Number of alleles per locus, alleles range,
which may have resulted in scoring errors or and expected and observed heterozygosity of
large allele dropout at any locus. The three each locus at seven microsatellite loci in brood-
loci also evidenced departure from HWE pro- stock and offspring are shown in Table 2. The
portions before Bonferroni correction, with two number of alleles for all loci in broodstock
of them (ucdCg10, ucdCg14 ) significant after ranged from 10 in ucdCg14 to 15 in ucdCg10
Bonferroni correction. There was no significant and L10, with an average of 13.3 alleles per
pair-wise linkage disequilibrium between any locus. There was no allele missing in offspring.
loci, which was in accordance with independent The observed heterozygosity of the offspring
segregation required by CERVUS. is little higher than that of the parental oys-
ter, but no significant differences were pre-
sented (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank
Parentage Analysis and Genetic Variability
test, P = 0.453). However, the expected het-
Parental assignment was performed on a erozygosity exhibited a significant decrease in
total of 155 individuals, including 141 off- the offspring population (Wilcoxon matched-
spring, 8 candidate mothers, and 6 candidate pairs signed-rank test, P = 0.016).
fathers. Overall, 98 and 100% of all offspring
were unambiguously allocated to their putative
Parents Contributions to Reproduction
parental pairs based on the information from
five and seven unlinked loci, respectively. The Parental contribution to reproduction was
cumulative assignment success with real data compiled as the total number of offspring
for different subsets of the polymorphic loci assigned to each adult in the above analy-
was shown in Figure 1. Of the assigned off- sis. For males, this number ranged from 8 to
spring, 85% of the genetic mismatches in the 40 offspring, with a mean of 23.5 offspring
putative parent/offspring analyses occurred at per male (variance = 134.3). For females, the
ucdCg10, ucdCg14, and cmrCg143. The results number ranged from 7 to a maximum of 33,
672 LI ET AL.

Table 3. Percentage of parental contribution to reproduction.

Female
Male F#1 F#2 F#3 F#4 F#5 F#6 F#7 F#8 All females

M#1 2.84 3.55 2.13 0.71 1.42 2.13 5.67 2.84 21.28
M#2 1.42 2.13 2.13 2.13 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.71 9.22
M#3 2.84 3.55 1.42 0.71 2.13 2.13 3.55 0.71 17.02
M#4 0.71 2.84 4.26 2.13 0.71 2.13 4.26 1.42 18.44
M#5 2.13 6.38 2.13 5.67 0.00 2.13 7.09 2.84 28.37
M#6 0.00 1.42 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.71 2.84 0.00 5.67
All males 9.93 19.86 12.06 11.35 4.96 9.93 23.40 8.51

with a mean of 17.63 offspring per female average proportion of offspring contributed by
(variance = 73.98). The percentage of offspring different females in a single clutch ranking
related to each parent contributing to reproduc- from the most to the least successful, and the
tion was shown in Table 3. Offspring of all par- genetically effective maternity frequencies for
ents were observed. The average percentage of the mass spawning are shown in Table 5. The
offspring contribution was 12.5% (SE = 0.06) average number of mothers contributing to a
for females and 16.7% (SE = 0.08) for males. clutch was 6.83 (SE = 1.60), and the mean
Chi-square analyses showed significant differ- genetically effective maternity frequencies was
ences of reproductive success both in male 5.38 (SE = 1.30).
(χ 2 = 28.57, P = 0.00) and in female (χ 2 =
27.55, P = 0.00). Effective Population Size
Multiple paternity was detected in all eight The effective population size calculated for
female parents. Four to six genotypes of males unequal sex ratio of this mass spawning event
were observed in a single clutch of eggs. The was 13.71, which diminished 2.04% of the
average proportion of offspring sired by differ- absolute parents. When combined with vari-
ent males ranking from the most to the least ance in reproductive success of individuals, the
successful, and the genetically effective pater- calculated Ne was 11.42, which accounted for
nity frequencies for all the clutches are shown another reduction of 16.39% of the absolute
in Table 4. The average number of fathers con- parents. Because all the broodstock participated
tributing to a clutch was 5.13 (SE = 0.64) and in the spawning, the decrease in the value of Ne
the mean genetically effective paternity fre- was mainly caused by the variance in parental
quencies was 4.16 (SE = 0.74). contributions and unequal sex ratio, of which
Multiple maternity was also detected in all the former responded a larger part. The effec-
six male parents. Four to eight genotypes of tive number of males and females are 4.96 and
females were observed in a single clutch. The 6.72, respectively. Although all the males and

Table 4. Means ± SD paternity proportions for clutches in which from four to six males were detected to contribute
sperm.

Paternity Paternity Paternity Paternity Paternity


proportion proportion proportion proportion proportion
No. of males No. of of most of second-most of third-most of fourth-most of the least Genetically
participating clutches successful successful successful successful successful effective
in clutches (% of total) male male male male male paternity

4 1 (12.5) 0.43 ± 0.00 0.29 ± 0.00 0.28 ± 0.00 — — 3.27 ± 0.00


5 5 (62.5) 0.48 ± 0.09 0.31 ± 0.03 0.12 ± 0.05 0.11 ± 0.06 0.12 ± 0.00 3.99 ± 0.59
6 2 (25) 0.59 ± 0.38 0.25 ± 0.08 0.14 ± 0.00 0.10 ± 0.00 0.07 ± 0.00 5.03 ± 0.18
PARENTAGE AND EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATION IN OYSTER 673

females were contributing to the next genera-

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
Genetically

maternity
effective
tion, the variance of male contribution (134.3)

±
±
±
±
and female contribution (73.98) were great,

3.00
5.12
5.56
6.10
which also indicated that male contribution was
more skewed than that of female. The rate of

successful female
proportion of inbreeding within the spawning (F ) was esti-

0.04 ± 0.01
Maternity

the least mated at a high value of 16.5% per generation.




Discussion
Parentage Analysis
successful female

Recently, the potential of microsatellite loci


proportion of

0.23 ± 0.00
0.06 ± 0.02
fifth-most
Maternity

for pedigree analysis have been studied in



many aquaculture species, and it has been


shown that the pedigree of mixed populations
could be determined through the use of four
to six microsatellite markers (O’Reilly et al.
successful female
Table 5. Means ± SD maternity proportions for clutches in which from four to eight females were detected to dam.

1998; Perez-Enriquez et al. 1999; Waldbieser


proportion of

0.10 ± 0.00
0.12 ± 0.07
fourth-most
Maternity

and Wolters 1999; Jerry et al. 2004; Dong et al.



2006; Hatanaka et al. 2006). This can provide


an efficient and economical methodology in
selection programs that will enable the maxi-
mization of genetic response for traits such as
successful female

growth, whereas minimize the potential detri-


proportion of

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
third-most
Maternity

mental effects of accumulated inbreeding.


±
±
±
±

Simulation assignment approaches are essen-


0.25
0.15
0.20
0.25

tial to test the theoretical power of these


microsatellite markers and allow the adjustment
of marker-selection toward the best cost/benefit
successful female
of second-most

direction. In this study, we have evaluated


0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
proportion
Maternity

the performance of seven microsatellite loci


±
±
±
±

reported previously for parentage assessment in


0.25
0.15
0.22
0.16

14 commercial Pacific oyster broodstock and in


141 progenies obtained by mass spawning. The
parentage assignment of both simulated and
most successful
proportion of

real offspring was efficient. The power of these


0.70 ± 0.00
0.25 ± 0.00
0.38 ± 0.10
0.5 ± 0.00
Maternity

female

markers to resolve parentage was generally in


accordance with that predicted by simulation
(Fig. 1).
Although usually low, frequencies of null
alleles above 20% have been reported in oys-
(% of total)
clutches

(16.7)
(16.7)
(16.7)
(50.0)
No. of

ter stocks (McGoldrick et al. 2000). The pres-


ence of null alleles is a classical source of
1
1
1
3

incompatibilities in parentage assignment with


microsatellite loci, with the frequencies above
No. of females

5% are considered to compromise pedigree


participating
in clutches

determination (Marshall et al. 1998). Of the


assigned offspring in this experiment, 85%
of the genetic mismatches were detected in
4
6
7
8
674 LI ET AL.

three loci (ucdCg10, ucdCg14, and cmrCg143 ), population without affecting census population
which were proved by MICRO-CHECKER size. This factor is expected to be especially
analyses to have null alleles. Nonetheless, it important in highly fecund species, in which
seems that adding these loci in the parentage most of the mortality occurs during the egg
analysis increased detection probability and did and larval stages (Hedgecock 1994). Boudry
not lower the overall confidence level at which et al. (2002) showed a high variance in parental
offspring were assigned. Generally, in this study contributions (even when gametic contribu-
a higher allocation efficiency of Pacific oyster tions are balanced) of the Pacific oyster in
parental assignment was attained with six loci a controlled experiment. Sekino et al. (2003)
to overcome the assignment failures that may reported an extreme case for the broodstock
arise from genotyping errors, non-amplifying or males of Japanese flounder: more than 99% of
null alleles. This achievement appears plausi- the offspring turned out to have been sired by
ble, given our a priori assignment expectations a single male. The Pacific oyster mass spawn-
based on simulation procedures and on the pre- ing study reported here seems to be a compar-
dictions of the parentage model of Marshall atively balanced case that all the broodstock
et al. (1998). contributed to the reproduction; this is proba-
bly because of the mass spawning method and
Genetic Variability, Effective Population Size, careful selection of ripe individuals used here.
and Parental Contributions These strategies can neglect some factors such
as non-random mating and poor gamete quality
Many theoretical and empirical studies have that will result in uneven parental contribution
provided supporting evidence for the positive and successive decline of effective population
relationship between genetic variation and fit- size. However, because of the high mortality
ness in animals and plants (Fisher 1930; Allen- during metamorphism, it may not be so bal-
dorf and Leary 1986; Ledig 1986). Allelic anced for the adult data for this species. Even
diversity and heterozygosity are both measures with all broodstock participating, obvious dif-
of genetic variation. In this study, there were no ferences between parental contributions existed
differences of allelic diversity or observed het- in the study. Chi-square analyses showed sig-
erozygosity (Ho ) between parents and offspring nificant differences of reproductive success both
populations, but the expected heterozygosity in male (χ 2 = 28.57, P = 0) and female (χ 2 =
(He ) had a significant decrease in offspring. The 27.55, P = 0). The high variance in parental
plans of careful selection of ripe broodstock and contributions may be influenced by many fac-
scientific induced-spawning method used here tors such as differential viability among geno-
ensured that all parental oysters contributed to types, uneven sex ratios, and fluctuating family
the next generation and to some extent avoided sizes (Hedgecock and Sly 1990; Gaffney et al.
the missing of alleles and sustained the stability 1992; Boudry et al. 2002; Beaumont and Hoare
of observed heterozygosity. 2003).
Although it was restricted to analyze the Variance in the reproductive success of males
genetic differences through the traditional mea- is a striking feature of many animal species, and
sures of genetic variation, the estimation of this was proposed as a common limitation to
effective population size provides important Ne in marine mass spawning species (Hedge-
information about the genetic change in closed cock 1994). Male reproductive competition for
broodstock populations and hence got hold fertilization has been documented in a rapidly
of comprehensive attention. Low Ne /N ratios increasing number of genetic paternity stud-
were reported in many marine organisms ies of a wide range of fish species (DeWoody
(Gaffney et al. 1992; Hedgecock 1994; Fran- and Avise 2001). Some authors suggest the dif-
kham 1995). This could be the result of ferences between male’s reproductive success
high variance in parental contributions, which that has been documented in fish are largely
decrease genetically the effective size of a the result of male size rank, with larger males
PARENTAGE AND EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATION IN OYSTER 675

acquiring a larger proportion of offspring than hatchery population, the Ne per generation in
smaller males (Brawn 1961; Hutchings et al. a hatchery population should be increased by
1999; Bekkevold et al. 2002); others show- using methods not only adding the number of
ing a correlation between male condition fac- parents but also equalizing the sex ratio and
tor/weight and reproductive success with males contribution of each parent for future oyster cul-
of higher condition factor/weight siring a large tivation generations.
proportion of offspring (Fessehaye et al. 2006);
also sperm competition play an important role Conclusions
in reproductive success (Stockley et al. 1997).
Our paternity analyses revealed that multiple The high accuracy and economical method-
paternity appeared in all clutches, and hence ology of microsatellite parentage determina-
that oyster males experience high sperm com- tion exhibited in this study proved that the
petition intensity as the effective paternity fre- microsatellite-based pedigree tracing is an effe-
quency per clutch was significantly > 1, which ctive way for monitoring genetic changes in
was also the truth in maternity analyses, sug- reproductive programs. The effective popula-
gesting additional mate “choice” taking place tion size estimated from this pilot experimenta-
at the level of gametes as reported for Atlantic tion diminished to 11.42, timely reflecting the
cod (Rakitin et al. 1999). change in genetic variability. The large vari-
Avoiding inbreeding in shellfish is essential ance in parental contributions and unequal sex
for efficient long-term breeding strategies. In ratio were considered the main limitation to Ne
population under selection, inbreeding produces in this mass spawning event. This may give
negative effects such as increased homozygos- us an insight into the Pacific oyster cultiva-
ity, which leads to the increased chance of tion in present China that in order to avoid the
expression of lethal or lower fitness recessive deleterious effects of inbreeding depression and
genes, inbreeding depression, and reduction of maximize the genetic gains of Pacific oyster
genetic variance (Falconer 1989). Evans et al. cultivation in the long run, not only increas-
(2004) proved that the performance traits of ing the number of parents, but also equalizing
Pacific oysters are significantly affected by rel- the sex ratio and their contribution should be
atively low levels of inbreeding. Inbreeding considered to increase the effective number of
depression is also observed in the traits of breeders.
deformity rate and survival in the first gener-
ation of a full-sib family of the Pacific abalone
Acknowledgments
(Park et al. 2006). The long-tem rate of inbreed-
ing is determined not only by a planned mat-
The authors would like to thank the Haili
ing system but also by an effective popula-
Hatchery of Haiyang City for its support in
tion size for populations under artificial selec-
the breeding experiment. The study was sup-
tion (Wray and Thompson 1990). Assuming no
ported by the grants from National High Tech-
selection and random mating, the coefficient of
nology Research and Development Program
inbreeding estimated from effective population
(2006AA10A409, 2007AA09Z433) and Chi-
size per generation was 4.4% for this study
nese Ministry of Education (No. 707041).
(Falconer 1989). Bijma (2000) suggested an
inbreeding constraint of 1% per generation for
breeding programs. However, the mass spawn- Literature Cited
ing breeding of Pacific oyster in this study had Allendorf, F. W. and R. F. Leary. 1986. Heterozygosity
a much higher F values of 16.5%, suggesting and fitness in natural populations of animals. Pages
57–76 in M. E. Soulé, editor. Conservation biology:
a significant inbreeding depression might occur
The science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Asso-
in this small-scale, mass spawning study. In ciates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
order to reduce the risks of inbreeding, partic- Allendorf, F. W. and S. R. Phelps. 1980. Loss of genetic
ularly within an unrecorded selective breeding variation in a hatchery stock of cutthroat trout.
676 LI ET AL.

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society Fessehaye, Y., Z. El-bialy, M. A. Rezk, R. Crooijmans,
109:537–543. H. Bovenhuis, and H. Komen. 2006. Mating systems
Beaumont, A. R. and K. Hoare. 2003. Biotechnology and male reproductive success in Nile tilapia (Ore-
and genetics in fisheries and aquaculture. Blackwell ochromis niloticus) in breeding hapas: a microsatellite
Publishing, United Kingdom. analysis. Aquaculture 256:148–158.
Bekkevold, D., M. W. Hansen, and V. Loeschcke. 2002. Frankham, R. 1995. Effective population size, adult pop-
Male reproductive competition in spawning aggrega- ulation size ratios in wildlife—a review. Genetical
tions of cod (Gadus morhua L.). Molecular Ecology Research 66:95–107.
11:91–102. Gaffney, P. M. and T. M. Scott. 1984. Genetic heterozy-
Bijma, P. 2000. Long term genetic contributions. Pre- gosity and production traits in natural and hatchery
diction of rates of inbreeding and genetic gain in populations of bivalves. Aquaculture 42:289–302.
selected populations. PhD thesis. Pages 205–206. Ani- Gaffney, P. M., C. V. Davis, and R. O. Hawes. 1992.
mal Breeding and Genetics Group, Wageningen Uni- Assessment of drift and selection in hatchery popu-
versity, The Netherlands. lations of oysters (Crassostrea virginica). Aquaculture
Boudry, P., B. Collet, F. Cornette, V. Hervouet, and 105:1–20.
F. Bonhomme. 2002. High variance in reproduc- Gall, G. A. E. 1987. Inbreeding. Pages 47–87 in
tive success of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas, N. Ryman and F. Utter, editors. Population genetics
Thunberg) revealed by microsatellite-based parent- and fishery management. University of Washington
age analysis of multifactorial crosses. Aquaculture Press, Seattle, Washington, USA.
204:283–296. Hara, M. and M. Sekino. 2003. Efficient detection of
Brawn, V. M. 1961. Reproductive behaviour of the cod parentage in a cultured Japanese flounder Paralichthys
(Gadus callarias L.). Behaviour 18:177–197. olivaceus using microsatellite DNA marker. Aquacul-
Brown, R. C., J. A. Woolliams, and B. J. McAndrew. ture 217:107–114.
2005. Factors influencing effective population size in Hatanaka, A., S. Yamada, T. Sakamoto, and T. Mitsub-
commercial populations of gilthead seabream, Sparus oshi. 2006. Isolation and application of microsatellite
aurata. Aquaculture 247:219–225. DNA markers for pedigree tracing of seedlings of red
Cross, T. F. and J. King. 1983. Genetic effects of hatch- sea bream (Pagrus major ). Journal of the World Aqua-
ery rearing in Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 33:33–40. culture Society 37:139–143.
Crow, J. F. and M. Kimura. 1970. An introduction to Hedgecock, D. 1994. Does variance in reproductive suc-
population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New cess limit effective population sizes of marine organ-
York, USA. isms? Pages 122–134 in A.R. Beaumont, editor.
Danzmann, R. G., M. M. Ferguson, and F. W. Genetics and evolution of aquatic organisms. Chapman
Allendorf. 1989. Genetic variability and compo- and Hall, London, UK.
nents of fitness in hatchery strains of rainbow trout. Hedgecock, D. and F. Sly. 1990. Genetic drift and effec-
Journal of Fish Biology 35:313–319. tive population sizes of hatchery-propagated stocks
DeWoody, J. A. and J. C. Avise. 2001. Genetic perspec- of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Aquaculture
tives on the natural history of fish mating systems. 88:21–38.
Journal of Heredity 92:167–172. Hedrick, P. W. 2000. Genetics of populations, 2nd edition.
Department of Fisheries, 2005. China fisheries statis- Jones and Bartlett Publishers, London, UK.
tic yearbook 2004. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, Herbinger, C. M., R. W. Doyle, E. R. Pitman, D.
China (in Chinese). Paquet, K. A. Mesa, D. B. Morris, J. M. Wright,
Dong, S. R., J. Kong, T. S. Zhang, X. H. Meng, and D. Cook. 1995. DNA fingerprint based analysis
and R. C. Wang. 2006. Parentage determination of paternal and maternal effects on offspring growth
of Chinese shrimp (Fenneropenaeus chinensis) and survival in communally reared rainbow trout.
based on microsatellite DNA markers. Aquaculture Aquaculture 137:245–256.
258:283–288. Hutchings, J. A., T. D. Bishop, and C. R. McGregor-
Duchesne, P., M.-H. Godbout, and L. Bernatchez. 2002. Shaw. 1999. Spawning behaviour of Atlantic cod,
PAPA (Package for the Analysis of Parental Allo- Gadus morhua: evidence of mate competition and
cation): a computer program for simulated and mate choice in a broadcast spawner. Canadian Journal
real parental allocation. Molecular Ecology Notes of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:97–104.
2:191–193. Huvet, A., P. Boudry, M. Ohresser, C. Delsert, and
Evans, F., S. Matson, J. Brake, and C. Langdon. 2004. F. Bonhomme. 2000. Variable microsatellites in the
The effects of inbreeding on performance traits of Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas and other cupped
adult Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas). Aquaculture oyster species. Animal Genetics 31:71–72.
230:89–98. Jerry, D. R., N. P. Preston, P. J. Crocos, S. Keys,
Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selec- J. R. S. Meadows, and Y. Li. 2004. Parentage
tion. Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. determination of Kuruma shrimp Penaeus (Marsupe-
Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. naeus) japonicus using microsatellite markers (Bate).
3rd edition. Longman, England. Aquaculture 235:237–247.
PARENTAGE AND EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATION IN OYSTER 677

Koehn, R. K., W. J. Diehl, and T. M. Scott. 1988. The Park, C., Q. Li, T. Kobayashi, and A. Kijima. 2006.
different contribution by individual enzymes of gly- Inbreeding depression traits in Pacific abalone Haliotis
colysis and protein catabolism to the relationship discus hannai by factorial mating experiments. Fish-
between heterozygosity and growth rate in the coot eries Science 72:774–780.
clam Milinia lateralis. Genetics 118:121–130. Perez-Enriquez, R., M. Takagi, and N. Taniguchi. 1999.
Koljonen, M. L., J. Tähtinen, M. Säisä, and J. Genetic variability and pedigree tracing of a hatchery-
Joskiniemi. 2002. Maintenance of genetic diver- reared stock of red sea bream (Pagrus major ) used
sity of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) by captive for stock enhancement, based on microsatellite DNA
breeding programmes and the geographic distribution markers. Aquaculture 173:413–423.
of microsatellite variation. Aquaculture 212:69–92. Primack, R. B. 1998. Essentials of conservation biology,
Lande, R. and G. F. Barrowclough. 1987. Effective pop- 2nd edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mas-
ulation size, genetic variation, and their use in popula- sachusetts, USA.
tion management. Pages 87–123 in M. Soule, editor. Rakitin, A., M. M. Ferguson, and E. A. Trippel. 1999.
Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge Uni- Sperm competition and fertilization success in Atlantic
versity Press, Cambridge, UK. cod (Gadus morhua): effect of sire size and condition
Lannan, J. E. 1980. Broodstock management of Cras- factor on gamete quality. Canadian Journal of Fisheries
sostrea gigas: IV. Inbreeding and larval survival. and Aquatic Sciences 56:2315–2323.
Aquaculture 21:353–356. Raymond, M. and F. Rousset. 1995. Population genetics
Ledig, F. T. 1986. Heterozygosity, heterosis, and fitness software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of
in outbreeding plants. Pages 77–104 in M. E. Soulé Heredity 86:248–249.
editor. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity Rice, R.W. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests.
and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mas- Evolution 43:223–225.
sachusetts, USA. Ryman, N. and G. Stahl. 1980. Genetic changes in hatch-
Li, Q., C. Park, and A. Kijima. 2003. Allelic transmission ery stocks of brown trout (Salmo trutta). Canadian
of microsatellites and application to kinship analysis Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:82–87.
in newly hatched Pacific abalone larvae. Fisheries Sekino, M., K. Saitoh, T. Yamada, A. Kumagai,
Science 69:883–889. M. Hara, and Y. Yamashita. 2003. Microsatellite-
Li, Q., H. Yu, and R. H. Yu. 2006. Genetic variability based pedigree tracing in a Japanese flounder
assessed by microsatellites in cultured populations Paralichthys olivaceus hatchery strain: implica-
of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in China. tions for hatchery management related to stock
Aquaculture 259:95–102. enhancement program. Aquaculture 221:255–263.
Magoulas, A., B. Ghjetvaj, V. Terzoglou, and Stockley, P., M. J. G. Gage, G. A. Parker, and
E. Zouros. 1998. Three polymorphic microsatel- A. P. Møller. 1997. Sperm competition in fishes: the
lites in the Japanese oyster, Crassostrea gigas evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics.
(Thunberg). Animal Genetics 29:69–70. American Naturalist 149:933–954.
Marshall, T. C., J. Slate, L. E. B. Kruuk, and Sugama, K., N. Taniguchi, and S. Umeda. 1988. An
J. M. Pemberton. 1998. Statistical confidence experimental study on genetic drift in hatchery pop-
for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural ulation of red sea bream. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi
populations. Molecular Ecology 7:639–655. 54:739–744.
McGoldrick, D., D. Hedgecock, L. J. English, Taniguchi, N., K. Sumantadinata, and S. Iyama. 1983.
P. Baoprasertkul, and R. D. Ward. 2000. The Genetic change in the first and second generations
transmission of microsatellite alleles in Australian of hatchery stock of black sea bream. Aquaculture
and North American stocks of the Pacific oyster 35:309–320.
(Crassostrea gigas): selection and null alleles. The Waldbieser, G. Y. and W. R. Wolters. 1999. Application
Journal of Shellfish Research 19:779–788. of polymorphic microsatellite loci in a channel catfish
Norris, A. T., D. G. Bradley, and E. P. Cunningham. Zctalurus punctatus breeding program. Journal of the
2000. Parentage and relatedness determination World Aquaculture Society 30:256–262.
in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) using Wray, N. R. and R. Thompson. 1990. Prediction of
microsatellite markers. Aquaculture 182:73–83. rates of inbreeding in selected populations. Genetical
O’Reilly, P. T., C. M. Herbinger, and J. M. Wright. Research 55:41–54.
1998. Analysis of parentage determination in Atlantic Zar, J. H., editor. 1999. Paired-sample hypotheses, Pages
salmon (Salmo salar) using microsatellites. Animal 161–176 in Biostatistical analysis, 4th edition. Pren-
Genetics 29:363–370. tice Hall, New Jersey, USA.

You might also like