ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES AND PROJECTS

SCORE Score Per

DESCRIPTORS
NO PARTLY YES Item

1. Initial Activities to Facilitate GAD Mainstreaming (max score: 5; for each item or question:0.83)

Organization has not Organization initiated or Organization initiated or

1.1 Is the organization observing
initiated or participated in participated in 1-2 participated in 3 or more
international/ national/local
the observance of observance of international/ observance of international/ 0.83
GADrelated events (possible scores
international/ national/ local national/ local GADrelated national/ local GADrelated
are 0, 0.41 and 0.83)
GADrelated events events events

1.2 Has the organization conducted

Basic GAD Orientation or Gender Basic GAD Orientation or Basic GAD Orientation or
No Basic GAD orientation or
Sensitivity Training (GST) for its GST conducted for either GST conducted for both 0.83
GST conducted for its clients
clients (internal and external)? internal or external clients internal and external clients
(possible scores are 0, 0.41 and 0.83)

1.3 Has the organization conducted

consultation activities with clients
(internal and external) to identify
gender issues and corresponding
strategies? (possible scores are 0, 0.41
and 0.83)
Conducted consultation with
either internal or external
No consultation conducted
clients to identify gender
with clients
issues and corresponding
strategies
Conducted consultation with
both internal and external
clients to identify gender
issues and corresponding
strategies

1.4 Has the organization consulted Initiated consultation with Initiated consultation with
PCW and relevant organizations/ either PCW or relevant both PCW and relevant
No consultation conducted at
individuals on its GAD mainstreaming organizations/ individuals on organizations/ individuals on
all
efforts? (possible scores are 0, 0.41 its GAD mainstreaming its GAD mainstreaming
and 0.83) efforts efforts

1.5 Has the organization reviewed and

revised existing
Information/Education/
1-3 existing IEC materials 4 or more existing IEC
Communication (IEC) materials and No review of existing IEC
and KPs reviewed but not materials and KPs reviewed 0.83
Knowledge Products (KPs) to ensure materials and KPs conducted
revised and revised
use of gender-fair language and
images? (possible scores are 0, 0.41
and 0.83)

1.6 Has the organization set up a GAD GAD IEC materials and KPs Established GAD corner
No plan to set up GAD
corner? (possible scores are 0, 0.41 compiled and collected to set with updated GAD IEC 0.83
corner
and 0.83) up GAD corner materials and KPs

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 1 PAPs) 3.32

2. Establishing Commitment towards Gender Mainstreaming (max score: 5; for each item or question: 0.62)
2.1 Has the organization formulated Draft GAD agenda or GAD agenda or strategic
No GAD agenda or strategic
GAD agenda or strategic framework? strategic framework framework formulated and
framework formulated
(possible scores are 0, 0.31 and 0.62) formulated approved

GPB is based on at least 1 of GPB is based on at least 3 of

2.2 Has the organization developed its GPB is not based on GAD
the following: GAD the following: GAD
GAD Plan and Budget (GPB) based on agenda/GAD Code,
agenda/GAD Code, agenda/GAD Code,
GAD agenda, emerging gender issues, emerging gender issues,
emerging gender issues, emerging gender issues,
international/ national GAD mandates international/national GAD
international/ national GAD international/ national GAD
and/or results of gender analysis? mandates and/ or results of
mandates and/or results of mandates and/or results of
(possible scores are 0, 0.31 and 0.62) gender analysis
gender analysis gender analysis

2.3 Has the organization conducted

deepening sessions on GAD based on Conducted deepening
Conducted deepening
the results of the Training Needs session/s on GAD for either
sessions on GAD for either
Assessment (TNA) or updated GAD the GFPS or concerned staff
No deepening sessions on GFPS or concerned staff
policies and tools as part of the members but not based on
GAD conducted members based on the results
continuing capacity development of the results of TNA or
of TNA or updated GAD
GAD Focal Point System (GFPS) and updated GAD policies or
policies or tools
concerned staff members? (possible tools
scores are 0, 0.31 and 0.62)

2.4 Has the organization used Gender

Results of the application of Results of the application of
Analysis (GA) tools and techniques in No GA tool applied to
GA tools used to review, GA tools used to review,
the review, enhancement or develop, review and/or
enhance or develop 1-2 enhance or develop 3 or
development of PAPs? (possible enhance PAPs
PAPs more PAPs
scores are 0, 0.31 and 0.62)

2.5 Does the organization have With existing facilities and

No facilities and services With existing facilities and
facilities and services that address the services that address the
addressing gender issues and services that address gender
gender issues and concerns of its gender issues and concerns
concerns of the issues and concerns of both
clients (internal and external)? of either internal or external
organization’s clients internal and external clients
(possible scores are 0, 0.31 and 0.62) clients
2.6 Has the organization developed
Developed GAD orientation Developed GAD orientation
orientation modules for new No GAD orientation module
module but not yet included module and included in the
employees with gender-sensitivity as a with gender sensitivity as a
in the orientation of new orientation of new
core competency? (possible scores are core competency developed
employees employees
0, 0.31 and 0.62)

2.7 Has the organization developed

and disseminated new
Information/Education/
Communication (IEC) materials on
GAD to clients (internal and external)?
(possible scores are 0, 0.31 and 0.62)
Developed but has not
No new GAD IEC materials Developed and disseminated
disseminated new GAD IEC 0.83
developed new GAD IEC materials
materials

2.8 Has the organization created a Developed GAD section in Developed GAD section in
No GAD section in the
GAD section in its website? (possible organization website but not organization website and
agency website
scores are 0, 0.31 and 0.62) updated regularly updated

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 2 PAPs) 0.83

3. GAD Application (max score: 5; for each item or question: 0.71)

3.1 Has the organization monitored the

Implementation of GAD Implementation of GAD
implementation of its GAD Programs/ Implementation of GAD
PAPs intermittently PAPs regularly monitored
Activities/Projects (PAPs)? (possible PAPs not monitored
monitored and not reported and reported
scores are 0, 0.35 and 0.71)

3.2 Has the organization prepared and

submitted on time its GAD Plan and
Budget (GPB) and GAD GPB and GAD AR
GPB and GAD AR not GPB and GAD AR endorsed
Accomplishment Report (GAD AR)? submitted to PCW*/ DILG**
submitted to PCW/DILG by PCW*/ DILG**
(possible scores are 0, 0.35 and 0.71) but not endorsed
*PCW endorses GPBs of NGAs,
GOCCs and SUCs
3.3 Has the organization conducted
GAD capacity development GAD capacity development
and sustained the GAD capacity No GAD capacity
conducted and sustained for conducted and sustained for
development of its clients (internal and development conducted and
either internal or external both internal and external
external)? (possible scores are 0, 0.35 sustained for clients
clients clients
and 0.71)

3.4 Has the organization conducted No GAD capacity Conducted GAD capacity Conducted GAD capacity
GAD capacity development sessions development session development session but no development session that
for its internal GAD experts? (possible conducted to develop internal GAD experts resulted in the development
scores are 0, 0.35 and 0.71) internal GAD experts developed of internal GAD experts

3.5 Has the organization regularly

applied Gender Analysis (GA) tools in
the development planning cycle GA tools applied in 1-2 GA tools applied in all levels
No GA tools applied in
(planning, implementation and levels of the development of the development planning
development planning cycle
management, and monitoring and planning cycle cycle
evaluation)? (possible scores are 0,
0.35 and 0.71)

3.6 Has the organization regularly

updated its GAD section in the GAD section has not been GAD section updated GAD section updated
website? (possible scores are 0, 0.35 updated for more than a year annually quarterly or more often
and 0.71)
3.7 Has the organization set up a
Knowledge Management (KM) system
No existing plan to set up Has set up a KM system to
as a mechanism to transfer knowledge Has initial plan to set up KM
KM transfer knowledge on GAD
on GAD? (possible scores are 0, 0.35
and 0.71)
Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 3 PAPs)

4. GAD Commitment and Institutionalization (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.0)

4.1 Has the organization sustained

GAD mandates continuously GAD mandates continuously
implementation and monitoring of
GAD mandate not implemented but not implemented and regularly
international, national and local GAD
implemented and monitored regularly monitored by the monitored by the
mandates in its PAPs? (possible scores
organization organization
are 0,0.5, and 1)

4.2 Has the organization conducted Organizational/ sector- Organizational/ sector-

No organizational sector-
organizational/sector- specific capacity specific GAD capacity specific GAD capacity
specific capacity
development sessions on GAD for development session/s development session/s
development session/s on
clients (internal and external)? conducted for either internal conducted for both internal
GAD conducted
(possible scores are 0,0.5, and 1) or external clients or external clients

4.3 Does the organization regularly

apply gender analysis (GA) tools to GAD tools used to assess GAD tools used to assess
GAD tools not applied to
assess gender-responsiveness of genderresponsiveness of 1-2 genderresponsiveness of 3 or
assess PAPs
programs/activities/ projects (PAPs)? PAPs more PAPs
(possible scores are 0,0.5, and 1)

4.4 Has the organization developed a

Draft sustainability action Sustainability action plan on
sustainability action plan for its GAD No sustainability action plan
plan on GAD PAPs GAD PAPs formulated and
PAPs? (possible scores are 0,0.5, and on GAD PAPs formulated
formulated approved
1)
4.5 Has the organization conducted Impact assessment of GAD
Gender impact assessment Impact assessment of GAD
impact evaluation of its GAD PAPs? PAPs completed and
not yet conducted PAPs ongoing
(possible scores are 0,0.5, and 1) reported
Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 4 PAPs)
5. Model PAPs (max score: 5; for each item or question: 1.25)

Organization has been

5.1 Has the organization been Organization has been
Organization is still recognized as a learning hub
recognized as a GAD learning hub for recognized as a learning hub
developing notable GAD and its GAD PAPs are
its notable GAD PAPs? (possible but GAD PAPs are not yet
PAPs replicated by other
scores are 0, 0.62 and 1.25) replicated
organizations

5.2 Has the organization’s partnership

with stakeholders resulted in a
No convergence model Convergence model Convergence model
convergence model that is recognized
resulting from partnership recognized but not replicated recognized and replicated
and replicated by other organizations?
(possible scores are 0, 0.62 and 1.25)

5.3 Has the organization’s Knowledge

Products (KPs) and
GAD KPs and GAD IEC GAD KPs and GAD IEC GAD KPs and GAD IEC
Information/Education/
materials not yet cited as materials used and cited as materials used and cited as
Communication (IEC) materials on
reference by other reference by at 1-2 reference by 3 or more
GAD been used by other
organizations organizations organizations
organizations? (possible scores are 0,
0.62 and 1.25)

5.4 Has the organization’s existing

Award system not yet Award system being Award/incentive system
award/incentive system been
integrated with GAD reviewed for integration of integrated with GAD
integrated with GAD perspective?
perspective GAD perspective perspective
(possible scores are 0, 0.62 and 1.25)

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 5 PAPs)

TOTAL GMEF SCORE (PAPs) 4.15
PROJECTS This matrix consists of 30 descriptors that track the
organization’s progress in mainstreaming GAD in all of its
Means of Verification
programs, activities and projects, whether through policy and/
or plan formulation and issuances, capacitating the GFPS

Teacher's Day, Araw ng Pagbasa, National

Awareness Week for the Prevention of Child
Sexual Abuse and Exploitation
and generating top-level management support on GAD, or the

Learning and Development Design,

Attendance, Accomplishment Report

establishment of enabling GAD mechanisms.

PurposeRes
ults of
Discuss the results of consultation activities Consultatio
Group Consulted (Internal/ External)
conducted. n (gender
issues and
strategies
identified)

Enumerate results of consultations initiated

including names of organizations/individuals
consulted.

Hanging of tarpauline, distribution of leaflets

on gender-fair language and images.

Provide a copy of the plan or photo layout of

the GAD corner and list down titles of
existing
Information/Education/Communication
(IEC) materials and KPs available for use
and reference of clients and GAD Focal
Point System (GFPS) members.
Attach draft or approved GAD agenda and/
or strategic framework (e.g. Department
Order setting 3-year GAD agenda of
agencies or GAD Code for LGUs).

Attach GPB for the most recent fiscal year

citing the basis for its development.

Also attach a copy of Training Needs Analysis (TNA) results and design of
Enumerate the deepening sessions on GAD deepening sessions. If TNA was not administered, please explain how the
conducted for GFPS and concerned staff: organization identified the need for deepening sessions and explain the basis for the
training design/s used.

Enumerate GA tools used to develop, review

and/or enhance PAPs.

Gender sensitive comfort rooms

Provision of materials from the MOOE
Attach copy of GAD orientation module(s)
with gender-sensitivity as a core competency.

Inclusion of GAD in the lessons

Please list website link for the GAD Section

of the organization.

Attach monitoring reports on the

implementation of GAD PAPs.

GAD Plan in the LGU

List GAD capacity development activities
conducted for clients.

Enumerate GAD capacity development

sessions conducted, and provide a list of
internal experts and their areas of expertise
developed through these sessions.

Enumerate GA tools applied in any stage of

the development planning cycle and the
frequency of application.

Provide a schedule involving the update of

the GAD section in the organization’s
website.

Attach the Knowledge Managem

List down GAD-related mandates being

implemented and monitored by the
organization and attach the relevant
monitoring reports.
List down titles of
organizational/sectorspecific capacity
development session/s on GAD conducted or
discuss status of the development of sector-
specific GAD capacity development
session/s for clients being done by the
organization (e.g. Women’s Economic
Empowerment, Gender and Justice, Gender
and Climate Change).

List down Programs/Activities/Projects

(PAPs) assessed and list of gender analysis
(GA) tools regularly applied by the
organization.

Attach draft or approved sustainability action

plan on GAD PAPs of the organization.
Attach a copy of Gender Impact Assessment
Report of the organization’s GAD PAPs.

List down awards/citations/recognitions/

nominations received.

Describe GAD convergence model that

resulted from the partnership

List down GAD KPs and GAD Information/

Education/Communication (IEC) materials
developed and utilized by the organization
(e.g. MCW mobile application, videos,
brochures, etc.).

Attach criteria for the existing

award/incentive system integrated with GAD
perspective and provide list of the awardees.

1: Foundation Formation
If
consultation
s were
conducted,
what
genderrelat
ed issues
were
reflected in
the GPB?
 ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - ENABLING MECHANISMS
SCORE Score Per
DESCRIPTORS
NO PARTLY YES Item

1. Setting up of Essential GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)

1.1 Has the organization created/

reconstituted its GAD Focal Point GFPS not created/ GFPS or similar GAD
GFPS or similar GAD
System (GFPS) in accordance with reconstituted in accordance mechanism created/
mechanism created/
Magna Carta of Women Implementing with MCW IRR Sec 37-C reconstituted in the central
reconstituted in the central 1.67
Rules and Regulations (MCW IRR) and pertinent policies issued office and/ or selected
office and all regional offices
Sec. 37-C and other pertinent policies by concerned oversight regional and/or attached
and attached agencies
issued by oversight agencies? (possible agencies agencies/offices only
scores are 0, 0.83, and 1.67)

1.2 Has the organization initiated

Organization conducted Organization initiated
exploratory activities with the
initial meetings/ exploratory activity/activities
Philippine Commission on Women
No exploratory activities consultations with PCW, with PCW, organizations
(PCW) or other agencies/LGUs,
initiated at all organizations and/or and/or individuals to
institutions and/or individuals to
individuals to facilitate facilitate gender
facilitate gender mainstreaming?
gender mainstreaming mainstreaming
(possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)

1.3 Has the organization collected

information towards the establishment
of sexdisaggregated database and
enhancement of its M&E system?
(possible scores are 0, 0.83, and 1.67)
No information collected
Intake forms developed and
Data and information
used to collect
collected but are not yet
sexdisaggregated data or
disaggregated by sex
gender statistics

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 1 Enabling Mechanisms) 1.67

2. Functional GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)

2.1 Does the organization have a

functional GAD Focal Point System
based on the provisions of the
guidelines issued by relevant oversight
agencies? (e.g. PCW MC 2011-01 for
NGAs, JMC 2013-01 for LGUs and
CHED MO 201501 for SUCs)
(possible scores are 0, 0. 5 and 1)
GFPS performing limited GFPS members actively
No functional GFPS based
functions based on the performing all the functions
on the provisions of the
provisions of the guidelines based on the provisions of
guidelines issued by relevant
issued by relevant oversight guidelines issued by relevant
oversight agencies
agencies oversight agencies

2.2 Has the organization established

other GAD mechanisms? (possible
No other GAD mechanism 1 other GAD mechanism 2 or more other GAD
scores are 0, 0. 5 and 1) *Other GAD
established established mechanisms established
Mechanisms refer to those in addition
to the GFPS and the GAD Database
2.3. Has the organization utilized at
least 5% of its budget* to implement
GAD PAPs? (possible scores are 0, 0. No GAD budget utilized
5 and 1) *refers to the total GAA of
NGAs and LGUs or COB for GOCCs
2.4. Has engagement with
organizations such as PCW, LGUs
and/or other agencies, and individuals
been established towards the conduct
of GADrelated PAPs for the
organization? (possible scores are 0, 0.
5 and 1)
2.5. Is the organization able to collect
or generate sexdisaggregated data
(SDD) and/or gender statistics*?
(possible scores are 0, 0. 5 and 1)
Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 2 Enabling Mechanisms)
3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
3.1 Do the organization’s other GAD
mechanisms coordinate, monitor and
report the progress of the
implementation of its functions?
(possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)
3.2 Has the organization utilized 30%
or more of its total budget* to
implement GAD PAPs? (possible
scores are 0, 0.5 and 1) *refers to the
total GAA of NGAs and LGUs or
COB for GOCCs
3.3 Has the organization judiciously
utilized its GAD budget to implement
GAD activities based on its GPB?
(possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)
3.4 Has the organization partnered
with agencies/ LGUs, institutions
and/or individuals towards the
strategic implementation of its GAD
PAPs? (possible scores are 0, 0.5 and
1)
3.5 Is the organization utilizing
sexdisaggregated data and/or gender
statistics in the development planning No SDD or gender statistics SDD and/or gender statistics SDD and/or gender statistics
cycle (planning, implementation and utilized in the development utilized in 1-2 stages of the utilized in all stages of the
management and monitoring and
evaluation)? (possible scores are 0, 0.5
and 1)
Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 3 Enabling Mechanisms)
Organization utilized less Organization utilized 5% or
than 5% of total budget to more of total budget to
implement GAD PAPs implement GAD PAPs
Organization has not Organization has sporadic Organization has established
engaged with engagement with working engagement with
agencies/LGUs, institutions agencies/LGUs, institutions agencies/LGUs, institutions
and/or individuals towards and/or individuals towards and/or individuals towards
the conduct of GADrelated the conduct of GADrelated the conduct of GADrelated
PAPs PAPs PAPs
No effort from the Organization is in the
Organization collecting and
organization yet to collect or process of collecting or
generating SDD and/or
generate SDD and/or gender generating SDD and/or
gender statistics
statistics gender statistics
Other GAD mechanisms
Other GAD mechanisms
coordinate and monitor
Other GAD mechanisms coordinate, monitor and
progress of implementation
established but not functional generate status/ progress
but do not generate
report of implementation
status/progress report
Organization utilized 5% or Organization utilized 6-29% Organization utilized 30% or
less of total budget to of total budget to implement more of total budget to
implement GAD PAPs GAD PAPs implement GAD PAPs
With AOM indicating non- With AOM commending the
With AOM indicating non-
utilization of at least 5% of judicious use of GAD funds
utilization of at least 5% of
its budget for GAD or Notice or no AOM from COA
its budget for GAD with
of Disallowance from COA indicating nonutilization of
acceptable justification from
with no justification from the at least 5% of its budget for
the organization
organization GAD
Has not partnered with other Partnered with 1 Partnered with 2 or more
organizations towards the organization towards the organizations towards the
strategic implementation of strategic implementation of strategic implementation of
GAD PAPs GAD PAPs GAD PAPs
planning cycle development planning cycle development planning cycle
4. Advanced GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)

Other GAD mechanisms are Other GAD mechanisms are

4.1 Are the organization’s other GAD
fully functional but still has fully functional and Other GAD mechanisms are
mechanisms able to contribute towards
to contribute to the contributing to the fully functional and resulted
the attainment of its desired impact/s?
attainment of desired attainment of desired in desired impact/s
(possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)
impact/s impact/s

4.2 Has the organization utilized 70%

or more of its total budget* to
Organization utilized 30% or Organization utilized 31- Organization utilized 70% or
implement GAD PAPs? (possible
less of total budget to 69% of total budget to more of total budget to
scores are 0, 0.5 and 1) *refers to the
implement GAD PAPs implement GAD PAPs implement GAD PAPs
total GAA of NGAs and LGUs or
COB for GOCCs

4.3 Is the organization’s database with

sexdisaggregated data and/or gender Database has no SDD and/or Database with SDD and/or Database with SDD and/or
statistics able to generate gender statistics and is not gender statistics generated 1- gender statistics generated 3
sectorspecific knowledge products able to generate sector- 2 sector-specific KPs on or more sector- specific KPs
(KPs) on GAD? (possible scores are 0, specific KPs on GAD GAD on GAD
0.5 and 1)

4.4 Is the organization’s M&E system

M&E system is not able to M&E system able to track M&E system able to track
able to track the desired gender-related
track genderrelated impacts genderrelated impacts of genderrelated impacts of
impacts of its GAD PAPs on clients
of GAD PAPs on clients GAD PAPs on either internal GAD PAPs on both internal
(internal and external)? (possible
(internal and external) or external clients and external clients
scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)

4.5 Does the organization have a

KM system has GAD-related KM system has GAD-related
Knowledge Management (KM)
KM system does not have KPs accessed and utilized by KPs accessed and utilized by
System with GADrelated knowledge
GAD-related KPs either internal or external both internal and external
products (KPs)? (possible scores are 0,
clients clients
0.5 and 1)
Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 4 Enabling Mechanisms)

5. Model GAD Structures and Systems (max score: 5; for each item or question:1)
5.1 Has the organization’s GAD Focal
Point System been recognized or GFPS nominated, shortlisted
GFPS not yet recognized as GFPS awarded as model
awarded as a model GAD mechanism or cited as model GAD
model GAD mechanism by GAD mechanism by
by reputable local, national, and mechanism by reputable
reputable organizations on reputable organizations on
international organizations on gender organizations on gender
gender mainstreaming gender mainstreaming
mainstreaming? (possible scores are 0, mainstreaming
0.5 and 1)
5.2 Has the organization’s other GAD
Other GAD mechanisms not Other GAD mechanisms Other GAD mechanisms
mechanisms been recognized as
yet recognized by other recognized as models by 1-2 recognized as models by 3 or
models by other organizations?
organizations as models organizations more organizations
(possible scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)

5.3 Has the organization utilized 100%

of its total budget* to implement GAD
PAPs? (possible scores are 0, 0.5 and
1) *refers to the total GAA of NGAs
and LGUs or COB for GOCCs
5.4 Has the organization established a
centralized database with sex-
disaggregated data and/or gender
statistics accessible to its regional
offices and attached agencies, as well
as external clients and partner
organizations? (possible scores are 0,
0.5 and 1)
5.5 Is the Knowledge Management
(KM) system of the organization
integrated with GAD and replicated by
other organizations? (possible scores
are 0, 0.5 and 1)
Organization utilized 71-
Organization utilized 70% or
99% or less of its total
less of its total budget to
budget to implement GAD
implement GAD PAPs
PAPs
Database with SDD and/or
Database with SDD and/or
gender statistics established
gender statistics established
and accessible to the central
but accessible only to the
office, regional offices and
central office
attached agencies
KM system of the KM system of the
organization not integrated organization integrated with
with GAD and not replicated GAD and replicated by 1-2
by other organizations organizations
Organization utilized 100%
of its total budget to
implement GAD PAPs
Database with SDD and/or
gender statistics established
and accessible to the central
office, regional offices and
attached agencies, as well as
to external clients and
partner organizations
KM system of the
organization integrated with
GAD and replicated by 3 or
more organizations
Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 5 Enabling Mechanisms)
TOTAL GMEF SCORE (ENABLING MECHANISMS) 1.67
MS This matrix consists of 23 descriptors that track the
progress of an organization’s efforts in ensuring that mechanisms
Means of Verification
to mainstream the GAD perspective are established and fully

functional.

GFPS of the school submitted already to

the district office

If yes, list down the exploratory

activities initiated by the organization
(e.g. meeting with PCW for the
identification of necessary capacity
development activities for GFPS and
staff members) to facilitate gender
mainstreaming

Trainings with sexdisaggregated

database

If GFPS is performing limited functions,

explain the challenges faced by the
GFPS of the organization in
mainstreaming GAD.
________________________________
_______

Enumerate other GAD mechanisms

established [e.g. Committee on Decorum
and Investigation (CODI), Violence
against Women and their Children
(VAWC) Referral System, Barangay
Violence against Women (VAW) Desk,
Women’s Economic Empowerment
(WEE) Desk, etc.]
LGU GAD Budget and Schools MOOE
budget

List down consultations with

organizations/ individuals regarding the
conduct of GAD-related PAPs of the
organization (e.g. conduct of a series of
If yes, enumerate
capacity typesactivities
development of SDD and
and/or
gender
technicalstatistics collected
assistance for theorpreparation
generated
(e.g.,
of GPB,sexdisaggregated
etc.): profile of
employees, client beneficiaries, cases of
VAW, etc.).
________________________________
_______
________________________________
_______
________________________________
_______ If applicable, list down
installed genderresponsive data
collection system/s of the organization
(e.g. National Violence Against Women
(NVAW) referral system,
genderresponsive Community-Based
Monitoring System (CBMS) etc.)

Attach status/progress report of the other

GAD mechanisms established by the
organization, including analysis of its
functions and recommendations.

Attach the GPB and GAD AR from the

same fiscal year (e.g. 2013 GPB and
2013 GAD AR)

Attach a copy of the Audit Observation

Memo (AOM) or Notice of Suspension
and Disallowances (NDs) received from
the Commission on Audit (COA) and
the organization’s justification, if
applicable.

List the partnership/s or joint program/s

towards the strategic implementation of
the organization’s GAD PAPs (e.g.
partnership for the conduct of a GAD-
related program)

List GAD-related data and indicators

used in the development planning cycle.
Attach status/progress report, client
satisfaction survey, results of gender
impact assessment, documented
testimonies, etc.

Attach the GPB and GAD AR of the

organization for the same fiscal year
(e.g. 2013 GPB and 2013 GAD AR).
Attach copies of M&E reports reflecting
gender-related impacts of the
organization’s GAD PAPs on its internal
and external clients, such as: 1. NGAs:
Gender
EnumerateImpact AssessmentKPs
sector-specific (GIA);
Annual
developed Audit
fromReports
database(AARs);
with SDD Audit
Financial Reports
and/or gender (AFRs);
statistics (e.g.Special Audit
caselets,
Reports (SARs);
case studies, Socio-Economic
briefers, fact sheets, etc.).
Reports (SERs), Philippine
Development Plan (PDP) Reports,
program/project reports,
accomplishment reports and other
related knowledge products (KPs); 2.
Explain
LGUs: End howofthe organization’s
term reports; AnnualKM
system facilitates the sharing
Audit Reports (AARs); administrative/of GAD-
related KPs to itsreports;
accomplishment clients (internal and/or
State of the
external).
Municipal Address (SOMA); State of
________________________________
the Province Address (SOPA),
_______
SocioEconomic Reports (SERs),
________________________________
Regional Project Monitoring &
_______
Evaluation System (RPMES) Reports,
________________________________
program/project reports, and other
_______ Attach theproducts
related knowledge list of KPs produced
Identify
and shared through the KM system
indicators that measure gender-related as
well as the
impacts KMorganization’s
of the Plan/ framework GAD or link
of the KM system, if applicable.
PAPs.

List awards/citations/documented
testimonies received.

List awards/citations/documented
testimonies received.

Attach the GPB and GAD AR of the

organization for the same fiscal year
(e.g. 2013 GPB and 2013 GAD AR)

Please provide link of database with

SDD. If the data is not uploaded in a
website, list the information/data that are
accessible to regional offices, attached
agencies, external clients and partner
organizations.

Explain how GAD is integrated in the

KM system of the organization and list
down other organizations that replicated
the KM system.
1: Foundation Formation
 PEOPLE ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
SCORE Score Per
DESCRIPTORS
NO PARTLY YES Item
1. On the Establishment of GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates (max score: 5; for each item or question, 0.83)

1.1 Has the organization designated

people in strategic positions as The organization has yet to Some members of the GFPS Majority of the members of
members of its GAD Focal Point identify key people to be occupy strategic positions in the GFPS occupy strategic
System (GFPS)? (possible scores are members of its GFPS the organization positions in the organization
0, 0.41, and 0.83)

1.2 Have the organization’s GAD

Focal Point System (GFPS) members GFPS members have not
GFPS members attended 1-2 GFPS members attended all
attended appropriate and relevant attended any of the basic 0.83
basic GAD training three basic GAD training
training on GAD? (possible scores are GAD training
0, 0.41, and 0.83)

1.3 Has the organization’s top

management attended Basic GAD
Orientation or Gender Sensitivity
Training (GST)? (possible scores are
0, 0.41, and 0.83)
Only selected members of
Top management has not yet All top management officials
the top management attended
attended Basic GAD have attended Basic GAD
Basic GAD Orientation or
Orientation or GST Orientation or GST
GST

Less than 50% of the
1.4 Have the organization’s staff
organization’s staff members
members been oriented on GAD?
have attended Basic GAD
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, and 0.83)
Orientation or GST
50-99% of the organization’s
staff members have attended
Basic GAD Orientation or
GST
100% of the organization’s
staff members have attended
0.41
Basic GAD Orientation or
GST

1.5 Are the organization’s top

Some top management and
management and GAD Focal Point Top management and GFPS Some GFPS members are
all GFPS members are aware
System (GFPS) members aware and members are not yet aware aware and conscious of
and conscious of 0.41
conscious of GAD-related policies and and conscious of GAD- GAD-related policies and
GADrelated policies and
mandates? (possible scores are 0, 0.41, related policies and mandates mandates
mandates
and 0.83)

Top management allows all

1.6 Does the organization’s top
management allow staff members to
participate in GAD-related activities?
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, and 0.83)
Top management does not
allow staff members to
participate in GADrelated
activities
Top management allows
key officials, GFPS members
only the GFPS members to
and staff members to 0.41
participate in GADrelated
participate in GADrelated
activities
activities

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 1 People) 2.06

2. GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities (max score: 5; for each item: 0.83)
2.1 Does the top management direct Top management approves
Top management approves
the implementation of the GAD Plan Top management does not GPB but not visible during
GPB and attends critical /
and Budget (GPB) of the organization? direct GPB implementation critical/significant GAD
significant GAD activities
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, and 0.83) activities

2.2 Are program implementers trained

on gender analysis (GA) and the use of Program implementers not Only selected program All program implementers
gender analysis (GA) tools? (possible yet trained on GA and use of implementers are trained on are trained on GA and use of
scores are 0, 0.41, and 0.83) GA tools GA and use of GA tools GA tools
2.3 Are concerned staff members
trained in the importance of collecting
sex-disaggregated data (SDD) and
gender statistics? (possible scores are
0, 0.41, and 0.83)
2.4 Are male employees involved and
appreciative of the organization’s
GAD PAPs? (possible scores are 0,
0.41, and 0.83)
2.5 Are clients (internal and external) Clients are not yet oriented
aware of the GAD efforts of the
organization? (possible scores are 0, organization
0.41, and 0.83)
2.6 Are the clients (internal and
external) able to articulate their gender
needs/issues in the development of the
organization’s GAD PAPs? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and 0.83)
3. GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs (max score: 5; for each item: .83)
3.1 Does the top management direct
the integration of GAD perspective in
the organization’s programs/activities/
projects (PAPs) and performance
indicators? (possible scores are 0,
0.41, and 0.83)
3.2 Are the GFPS members and
program implementers able to
integrate GAD perspective in the
development of the organization’s
programs/activities/ projects (PAPs)?
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, and 0.83)
3.3 Are concerned staff members able
to utilize sex-disaggregated data
(SDD) and/ or gender statistics for
gender analysis (GA) to enhance the
organization’s GAD PAPs? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and 0.83)
3.4 Does the top management support
the appointment of qualified women
staff members to leadership positions?
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, and 0.83)
3.5 Do women assume critical roles
and authority in the organization?
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, and 0.83) technical positions in the
3.6. Are the clients (internal and
external), able to participate in the
planning and implementation of the
organization’s GAD PAPs? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and 0.83)
4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers (max score: 5; for each item: 0.83)
Concerned staff members are Concerned staff members are
not yet trained in the trained in the importance of
importance of collecting collecting SDD and gender
SDD and gender statistics statistics
Male employees do not Male employees participate Male employees initiate and
participate in the in the organization’s GAD participate in the
organization’s GAD PAPs PAPs organization’s GAD PAPs
Either internal or external Both internal and external
on the GAD efforts of the clients are oriented on the clients are oriented on the
GAD efforts of the GAD efforts of the
organization organization
Clients (internal and Either internal or external Both internal and external
external) are not able to clients are able to articulate clients are able to articulate
articulate gender gender issues/needs in the gender issues/needs in the
needs/issues in the development of the development of the
development of the organization’s GAD PAPs organization’s GAD PAPs
organization’s GAD PAPs
Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 2 People)
With initial discussion
No initial discussion among
among top management Top management issued
top management officials on
officials regarding directive/s to integrate GAD
the integration of GAD
integration of GAD perspective in the
perspective in the
perspective in the organization’s PAPs and
organization’s PAPs and
organization’s PAPs and performance indicators
performance indicators
performance indicators
GFPS members and program Either GFPS members or Both the GFPS members and
implementers are not yet program implementers are program implementers are
able to integrate GAD able to integrate GAD able to integrate GAD
perspective in the perspective in the perspective in the
development of the development of the development of the
organization’s PAPs organization’s PAPs organization’s PAPs
Concerned staff members
Concerned staff members are utilize SDD and/or gender
Concerned staff members
not yet able to utilize SDD statistics for GA and
utilize SDD and/or gender
and/or gender statistics for recommend strategies to
statistics for GA
GA enhance the organization’s
GAD PAPs
Top management does not Top management appoints Top management appoints
appoint women to leadership women to leadership position women to leadership position
positions but provides limited support and provides full support
Women occupy less than
Women occupy less than
50% of third level positions
50% of the third level, Women occupy 50% or more
but comprise 50% or more of
middle management and of the third level positions in
the middle management and
the organization
technical positions in the
organization
organization
No client (internal and Either internal or external Both internal and external
external) involvement in the clients participate in the clients participate in the
planning and implementation planning and implementation planning and implementation
of the organization’s GAD of the organization’s GAD of the organization’s GAD
PAPs PAPs PAPs
Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 3 People)
4.1 Are the GAD Focal Point System
(GFPS) members able to serve as GFPS members are not yet Less than 50% of the GFPS 50% or more of the GFPS
GAD resource persons within the serving as resource persons members are serving as members are serving as
organization, including its regional on GAD within the GAD resource persons GAD resource persons
offices and attached agencies? organization within the organization within the organization
(possible scores are 0, 0.41 and 0.83)
With initial discussion
4.2 Does the top management direct No initial discussion among
among top management Top management issued
the monitoring of the organization’s top management officials on
officials on the monitoring of directive/s to monitor the
GAD PAPs? (possible scores are 0, the monitoring of the
the organization’s GAD organization’s GAD PAPs
0.41 and 0.83) organization’s GAD PAPs
PAPs
4.3 Are concerned staff members able Concerned staff members Concerned staff members Concerned staff members
to adjust GAD PAPs to address not able to adjust GAD PAPs able to identify emerging able to identify and adjust
emerging gender issues? (possible to address emerging gender gender issues but are not GAD PAPs to address
scores are 0, 0.41 and 0.83) issues capable of addressing them emerging gender issues

4.4 Do top management and concerned GAD is not reflected in the GAD reflected in the GAD reflected in the
staff members reflect GAD functions performance contracts or performance contracts or performance contracts or
in their performance contracts or terms TORs of both top TORs of either top TORs of both top
of reference (TORs)? (possible scores management and concerned management or concerned management or concerned
are 0, 0.41 and 0.83) staff members staff members staff members
Concerned staff members
4.5 Are concerned staff members able
Concerned staff members not develop GAD tools and KPs Concerned staff members
to develop tools and/or knowledge
yet able to develop GAD on GAD with assistance develop GAD tools and KPs
products (KPs) on GAD? (possible
tools and KPs on GAD from external GAD on GAD on their own
scores are 0, 0.41 and 0.83)
experts/resource persons
Either internal or external
4.6 Are clients (internal and external) No participation from Both internal and external
clients have participated in
able to participate in 3 or more levels clients in all levels of the clients have participated in
1-2 levels of the
of the development planning cycle of development planning cycle all levels of the development
development planning cycle
the organization’s GAD PAPs? of the organization’s GAD planning cycle of the
of the organization’s GAD
(possible scores are 0, 0.41 and 0.83) PAPs organization’s GAD PAPs
PAPs

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 4 People)

5. GAD Experts (max score: 5; for each item, 1.67)
5.1 Does the top management raise
GAD concerns during high-level
meetings/ discussions? (e.g. Cabinet
cluster meeting, international
conferences) (possible scores are 0,
0.83 and 1.67)
5.2 Are the organization’s staff
members recognized as GAD experts Staff members not yet tapped
by other organizations? (possible
scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)
5.3 Are external clients of the
organization recognized as GAD
champions by reputable local, national recognized for their gender
and international organizations?
(possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)
Top management is able to
Top management has not Top management is able to raise and receive support on
raised GAD concerns during raise GAD concerns during GAD concerns from
high- level meetings high-level meetings colleagues during high-level
meetings
Staff members recognized as Staff members recognized as
GAD experts and tapped by GAD experts and tapped by
by other organizations
1-4 organizations 5 or more organizations
External clients received
nominations or have
External clients received
shortlisted and/or cited in
External clients not yet awards for their gender
their respective localities for
mainstreaming efforts from
their gender mainstreaming
mainstreaming efforts reputable local, national and
efforts by reputable local,
international organizations
national and international
organizations
Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 5 People)
TOTAL GMEF SCORE (PEOPLE) 2.06
 This matrix consists of 27 descriptors that track the
progress of an organization’s efforts in ensuring that its people,
Means of Verification
If yes, provide details on the policy whether top management, GFPS members or employees are
formalizing the creation/reconstitution of the
organization’s GAD Focal Point System
gender-responsive and supportive of the organization’s gender
(GFPS) and attach a copy for validation. If
no, explain why the organization has not
designated people in strategic positions as
members of its GAD Focal Point System
(GFPS)?
____________________________________
__ ______________________________ mainstreaming efforts
*Majority is defined at least 50%+ 1 of all
GFPS members as per SO, AO, DAO or
policy creating/reconstitutin
All teachdrs of the school attended relevant
training on GAD

List down top management official/s who

attended Basic GAD Orientation/Gender
Sensitivity Training (GST)

Attach attendance sheets of all Basic GAD

Orientations or Gender Sensitivity Training
(GST) conducted/attended by the
organization’s staff members.

If yes, explain how the top management and

GFPS members manifest awareness and
consciousness of GAD-related policies and
mandates (e.g. top management approves and
directs implementation of GPBs, attends
GADrelated activities, allows staff to
participate in GAD-related activities,
supports appointment of qualified women to
management positions, etc.)
Attach copies of policies issued by top
management allowing staff members to
participate in GAD-related activities (e.g.
office orders, travel orders, department
orders, executive orders, admin memos, etc.)
or accomplish the table below:

Cite critical incidents of top management

directing the implementation of the
organization’s GPB (e.g. presence or
participation during the setting of GAD
agenda, strategic planning on GAD, etc.)
Attach relevant documents indicating support
of top management to the implementation of
the GAD Plan and Budget of the
organization (e.g. attendance sheet, copy of
Opening/Closing
Enumerate training Remarks during
on Gender GAD (GA)
Analysis
training, photos taken during GAD training,by
and Gender Analysis (GA) Tools attended
etc.)
program implementers.
List down trainings conducted for concerned
staff members on the importance of
collecting sexdisaggregated data and gender
statistics.
Provide list of the organization’s PAPs
initiated and/or participated by male
employees:

If yes, identify efforts to orient clients on the

GAD efforts of the organization (e.g. PCW
website, news, GAD corner in the
organization, social media (FB, Twitter),
among others.
Attach documentation of consultations/
meetings (e.g. survey, focus group
discussions, key informant interviews) and
list of issues raised by clients (internal and
external) during consultations, etc.

Attach directive/s issued by top management

to integrate GAD perspective in the
organization’s program/activities/projects
(PAPs) and performance indicators.

Enumerate organization programs/activities/

projects (PAPs) and performance indicators
integrated with GAD perspective by GFPS
members and program implementers.

If yes, explain how concerned staff members

utilize sex-disaggregated data and/or gender
statistics for gender analysis to enhance the
organization’s GAD PAPs.

Attach documents issued by top management

supporting the appointment of qualified
women staff members in leadership positions
(e.g. department order or executive orders,
list of training available, documentation of
mentoring activities, etc.).

Identify the number of employees in the

If yes, describe
following how clients (internal or
positions:
external) participate in the planning and
implementation of the organization’s GAD
PAPs. ______________________________
______________________________
______________________________ Attach
documents showing external clients’
membership in the technical working groups
(TWGs) and project management offices
(TWGs) as well as attendance sheets and
documentation of meetings participated by
internal and external clients.
Attach list and profile of the GFPS members
including the GAD-related training
conducted.

Attach copies of directive/s issued by top

management regarding the monitoring of the
organization’s GAD PAPs as well as
monitoring reports, as applicable.

List down GAD PAPs calibrated to address

emerging gender issues.

A+E30:F33ttach sample of Terms of

Reference (TORs), Performance Contract,
Individual Performance Commitment and
Review (IPCR) forms of staff members and
Career Executive Service Performance
Evaluation System (CESPES) of top
management officials of the organization
Please provide details of tools and/or
knowledge products (KPs) on GAD
developed.

If yes, describe the participation of internal

and/or external clients in the development
planning cycle (planning, implementation
and management, monitoring and evaluation)
of the organization’s GAD PAPs.
______________________________

Attach documentation of meetings and/or

discussions where GAD concern/s was/were
raised by the organization’s top management.

Attach list and profile of internal GAD

experts. Enumerate
seminars/conferences/training facilitated by
internal GAD experts for other agencies and
organizations.
Awards/ Citations/ Nominations Received
(Attach copies of news articles, other write-
ups or documentation (e.g. TV interviews)
regarding gender mainstreaming efforts of
the external clients of the organization, if
applicable.)

1: Foundation Formation

DESCRIPTORS
1. Issuance of Foundational Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
1.1 Has the organization issued
policies articulating support to GAD
mandates and establishing the essential
elements of GAD Planning and
Budgeting? (possible scores are 0,
0.83 and 1.67)
POLICY ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
SCORE Score Per
NO PARTLY YES Item
No policy/policies Policy/policies articulating Policy/policies articulating
articulating support to GAD support to GAD mandates support to GAD mandates
mandates and establishing and establishing at least one and establishing all four
essential elements of GAD (1) essential element of GAD essential elements of GAD
planning and budgeting planning and budgeting planning and budgeting
issued issued issued

1.2 Has the organization conducted a

review of existing policies for Some existing policies Some existing policies
consistency with emerging GAD No policy reviewed reviewed but no new policies reviewed, revised and re-
issues? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 re-issued and/ or revised issued
and 1.67)

1.3 Has the organization issued broad

statements of intentions or aspirations
reflecting its support for GAD- related
activities? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 No broad statement 1-2 broad statements 3 or more broad statements
and 1.67) supporting GADrelated supporting GADrelated supporting GAD-related
activities issued activities issued activities issued
Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 1 Policy)
2. Issuance of Policies to mainstream GAD in the Organization (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)

2.1 Has the organization issued

No policy reflecting the 1-2 policies reflecting the 3 or more policies reflecting
policies reflecting its interest for
organization’s interest for organization’s interest for the organization’s interest for
gender mainstreaming? (possible
gender mainstreaming issued gender mainstreaming issued gender mainstreaming issued
scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)

2.2 Has the organization issued

No policy reflecting gender 1-2 policies reflecting gender 3 or more policies reflecting
policies addressing the gender needs of
needs of internal and/or needs of internal and/or gender needs of internal and/
the clients (internal and external)?
external clients issued external clients issued or external clients issued
(possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)

2.3 Has the organization used gender-

Gender-fair language and Gender-fair language and Gender-fair language and
fair language and images in its policy
images not yet used in policy images used in some policy images used in all policy
issuances? (possible scores are 0, 0.83
issuances issuances issuances
and 1.67)

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 2 Policy)

3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)

GAD Agenda/Strategic GAD Agenda/Strategic

No GAD Agenda/ Strategic
3.1 Has the organization adopted a Framework formulated but Framework formulated and
Framework formulated
GAD Agenda/Strategic Framework? not adopted by management adopted by management
(possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)

GAD perspective not yet GAD perspective integrated

3.2 Has the organization integrated integrated in organizational in selected areas of the
GAD perspective in its organizational and/ or national/ sectoral organizational and/ or
and/ or national/sectoral plan/s? plan/s national/sectoral plan/s
(possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)
3.3 Has the organization formulated
No organizational/ 1-2 organizational/ national/ 3 or more organizational/
organizational/national/ sectoral
national/sectoral policies on sectoral policies on GAD national/sectoral policies on
policies on GAD? (possible scores are
GAD issued issued GAD issued
0, 0.83 and 1.67)

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 3 Policy)

4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
4.1 Has the organization’s GAD
Gender gaps of either Gender gaps of either
policy/policies resulted in bridging
No gender gaps addressed by internal and/or external internal and/or external
gender gaps of its clients (internal and
GAD policy/policies clients are addressed by 1-2 clients are addressed by 3 or
external)? (possible scores are 0, 0.83
GAD policies more GAD policies
and 1.67)
4.2 Has the organization used the
Results of gender analysis Results of gender analysis Results of gender analysis
results of gender analysis in the
was not used in the used in the development used in the development
development and/ or enhancement of
development and/or and/or enhancement of 1-2 and/or enhancement of 3 or
policies? (possible scores are 0, 0.83,
enhancement of policies policies more policies
and 1.67)

4.3 Has the organization integrated

GAD perspective not yet GAD perspective integrated GAD perspective integrated
GAD perspective in its Vision,
integrated in the Vision, in either the Vision, Mission in the Vision, Mission and
Mission and Goals? (possible scores
Mission or Goals or Goals Goals
are 0, 0.83, and 1.67)

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 4 Policy)

5. Model GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 5)

5.1 Has the organization’s GAD
policies been used as model/standard
by other organizations? (possible
scores are 0, 2.5 and 5)
Other organizations have not 3 or more organizations have
1-2 organization/s have used
used the organization’s used the organization’s
the organization’s policy/
policy/ policies as model or policy/ policies as model/
policies as model/ standard
standard standard

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 5 Policy)

TOTAL GMEF SCORE (POLICY)
 This matrix consists of 13 descriptors that track the
Means of Verification
progress of an organization’s efforts in integrating GAD in its plans
and policy issuances.
Enumerate the GAD related policies issued
(e.g., policy on setting up GFPS or GAD
Office; collection and maintenance of sex-
disaggregated database; conduct of
organization-wide gender audit; capacity-
building plan for GFPS and HR of
organization).

Enumerate policies reviewed and/or re-

issued/ revised for consistency with new
GAD issuances (e.g. policy reconstituting
the GAD Focal Point System based on MC
2011-01, etc.).

Enumerate broad statements issued in

support of GAD related activities/issues
(e.g., memorandum for the organization to
participate in Women’s Month activities,
18-day Campaign on VAW, etc).

List all policies issued by the organization

related to gender mainstreaming (e.g.
issuance of DOH department order to
integrate GAD in all programs):

Enumerate all policies issued addressing

gender needs of internal and external clients
of the organization (e.g. issuance of policy
for the establishment of a child-minding
center for use of employees and clients with
small children)
Attach sample policy of the organization
directing the use of gender-fair language
and polices as well as policies of the
organization that used gender-fair language
and images.

Attach a copy of the GAD Agenda/

Enumerate the organizational
Strategic Framework and/or
of the organization (or
national/
GAD Code, sectoral plan/s in which GAD has
if LGU)
been integrated (e.g. Philippine
Development Plan, Annual Budget Call or
Gender-Responsive LGU Plans such as
Comprehensive Development Plan for
LGU) Organizational Plans (e.g., Work
Plan, Capacity Development Plan,
Procurement Plan; Sectoral Plan i.e. Youth
Plan, Disaster Plan, Disability Plan etc.)
Provide complete title of sector specific
GAD policies issued (e.g. Agency provision
in the MCW i.e. CSC-Special Leave for
Women, DFA- establishment of Gender
Focal Point Officer in Philippine Embassies
and Consulates, GAD Code, RH Code and
NAP WPS) and attach copies if available.

List down existing GAD policies of the

organization and how it bridged gender
gaps of its internal and/or external clients
(e.g. lowering and responding to the cases
Violence against Women

Enumerate enhanced policies, guidelines

and/ or documents enhanced based on the
results of gender analysis.

Identify where GAD perspective is

integrated in the Vision, Mission and/or
Goals (VMG) of the organization.

List down existing GAD policies used as a

model or replicated by other organizations
(e.g., GAD Agenda or Strategic Framework
for NGAs; Policy creating a Provincial
GAD Office or GAD Code for LGUs)

1: Foundation Formation
 GMEF SCORESHEET
Name of the Organization Assessed: MABAHIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Date Administered: October 19, 2021

Inclusive Period of Assessment: School Year 2021-2022

KEY AREAS SCORE

Policy
1. Issuance of initial policies on GAD
2. Issuance of policies to mainstream GAD in the organizatio
3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Policies
4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies
5. Model GAD Policy
Sub-Total:
Level for Policy 1: Foundation Formation
People
1. On Establishing GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates 2.06
2. On GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities
3. GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs
4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers
5. GAD Experts
Sub-Total: 2.06
Level for People 1: Foundation Formation
Enabling Mechanisms
1. Setting-up of Essential GAD Mechanisms 1.67
2. Functional GAD Mechanisms
3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Mechanisms
4. Advanced GAD Structures and Systems
5. Model GAD Structures and Systems
Sub-Total: 1.67
Level for Enabling Mechanisms 1: Foundation Formation
Programs, Activities and Projects (PAPs)
1. Initial Activities to Facilitate GAD Mainstreaming 3.32
2. Establishing Commitment towards GAD Mainstreaming 0.83
3. GAD Application
4. GAD Commitment and Institutionalization
5. Model PAPs
Sub-Total: 4.15
Level for PAPs 1: Foundation Formation
TOTAL SCORE 7.88
OVER-ALL LEVEL 1: Foundation Formation
 RANGES (Points) LEVEL DESCRIPTION RANGES (Points)
1: Foundation Formation - 7.99
Level Per 8 2: Installation of Strategic Mechanisms 8- 14.99
Entry Point
Level Per
Entry Point 15 3: GAD Application 15 - 19.99
20 4: Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization 20 - 23.99
24 5: Replication and Innovation 24 - 25
RANGES (Points) LEVEL DESCRIPTION RANGES (Points)
1: Foundation Formation - 30.99
Over-All 31 2: Installation of Strategic Mechanisms 31 - 60.99
Level 61 3: GAD Application 61 - 80.99
81 4: Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization 81 - 95.99
96 5: Replication and Innovation 96 - 100