Professional Documents
Culture Documents
29 March 2021
Labor Code Summary Explanation through examples
Provisions
Article 261. This article provides the With the main issue that whether
[250] procedure when a party there was sufficient cause for the
Procedure in desires to enter an agreement. dismissal of a rank-and-file
Collective It is through a written notice employee effectuated through the
Bargaining which the other party shall enforcement of a closed-shop
make its reply to this notice. provision in the Collective
However, when disputes arise, Bargaining Agreement (CBA)
either party can call a between the employer and the
conference, but when cannot union. The Voluntary Arbitrators
still settle the said dispute, which have jurisdiction to hear the
Board can intervene with the claim. The Labor Arbiter correctly
issuance of subpoenas refused to exercise jurisdiction over
requiring the attendance of Del Monte's cross-claim, and the
both parties, whereas both Court of Appeals would have no
party responsibility to basis had it acted differently. (DEL
participate to the conciliation MONTE PHILIPPINES, INC. and
meeting. WARFREDO C. BALANDRA G.R. No.
158620 October 11, 2006)
Article 262 In the case, G.R. No. L-2517, August
[251] Duty to A person or authority will 17, 1967 between the National
bargain bargain the rights of the Brewery and Allied Industries Labor
collectively in employees in the absence of Union (PAFLU) vs. San Miguel
the absence of collective bargaining Corporation and the Philippine
collective agreement. Banking Corporation. PAFLU is the
bargaining collective bargaining
agreements representative of the workers of the
San Miguel Corporation; that in the
biennial election of petitioner's
officers held on November 7, 1963,
under the collective bargaining
agreement between petitioner
and the San Miguel Corporation
the latter "will make payroll
deductions of dues and
assessments of members of the
union" and "All deductions made
by the Company will be remitted to
the treasurer of the Union within a
reasonable time after each
payday". The arbitrator rendered a
decision declaring that Antonio
Santos (President) and Bonifacio
Flores (National Treasurer), among
others, "are the elected officers
and members of the National
Council of the respondent Union for
the years 1964-1965 and therefore
the lawful party to have
administered the collective
bargaining contract, 1962-1965".
Article 264 Both parties involved have the This article would mean and
[253] Duty to same right in negotiating nor relatable today especially when
Bargain modifying such agreement with companies that already had a CBA
Collectively a given duration if there will be and due to the pandemic
When There anomalies that will occur, but economic difficulties arose there
Exist a then both of the parties are also could be a modifying of
Collective responsible in complying with agreements but then they should
Bargaining the terms and conditions being still continue the terms and
Agreement agreed upon during the conditions of said contract until
negotiation period. new contract will be agreed upon
by both parties.
Article 267 If the employees entering into a For instance, when an employee
[255] Exclusive collective bargaining failed to comply with the demands
Bargaining agreement cannot afford legal of his employer and not given the
Representation assistance, should be chance to listen to their grievances
and Workers’ represented by the labor resulting in a disagreement and
Representation organization selected by the cannot afford a legal assistance,
in Policy and employee, adding to that the their labor organizations would
Decision- employees can also present represent them.
Making their grievances to the
employers and can take part in
the decision making if it will
affect their rights, benefits and
welfare.
Article 270 An employer can petition for an The pandemic had been used as
[258] When an election if there is a request to excuse to cut costs and further
Employer may bargain collectively, this refers labor flexibility. DOLE had allowed
File Petition to all negotiations and employers to negotiate new terms
agreements of the employer of work, may it be negative or not
and employee. However, if towards employees. Employers
there is no existing collective taking advantage of the
bargaining argreement (CBA) pandemic. Normally an
the bureau shall order a agreement must be agreed by
certification election which both parties. However, since a lot of
determines the sole and laborers are in need of finance,
exclusive bargaining agent they will accept any negotiations
(SEBA) through secret ballot. to enable them to survive this
The employer may file a pandemic.
petition for certification
election with the Regional
Office. The certification shall be
decided within twenty days in
obedience to the rules and
regulation prescribed by the
Secretary of Labor. However,
The employer shall not be
considered a party to a petition
for certification election,
whether it is filed by an
employer or a legitimate labor
organization, and shall have no
right to oppose it. Its
participation shall be limited
only to being notified or
informed of petition for
certification election and
submitting the certified list of
employees or where necessary,
the payrolls.
Article 271 Even the certification election is A registered organization has filed
[258-A] filed by the employer or a for a certification election, for the
Employer as legitimate labor organization, purpose of collective bargaining,
Bystander they do not have the rights to the employer of the members
oppose any filing of within the organization cannot be
certification election. an active party unless with legal
ground (1997 case of Toyota Motor
Philippines Corp. vs. Toyota Motor
Philippines Corporation Labor
Union)
Article 272 Any party who may seem to Amid the Coronavirus domination
[259] Appeal have violated a law on the over the physical interaction in the
from election that was determined workplace, there are a lot of
Certification by the med arbiter can directly people who were restricted to be
Election Orders be filed a case to the Secretary physically present in their
of Labor and employment. departments. Instead, they are
These violations and conflicts advised to be working from home
may either be nonagricultural also to lessen the spread of the said
or agricultural, depending on virus. However, some jobs require
what arises. Secretary of labor the physical presence expected
and employment must also from their employees. Hence,
play its role and subject its compelling them to be at work
authority to mend any cases physically despite the threat of
that will arise if this affects the Covid 19. As a result, some
labor management. This will employees are forced to absent
take place within 15 days. The themselves from work due to fear of
15-working day deadline, the said virus. Employers on the
however, shall not apply to other hand punish the employees
cases involving deadlocks in who make themselves absent.
collective bargaining which the Labor Secretary Silvestre Bello III
Bureau shall certify to the nonetheless strongly recommends
appropriate Labor Arbiters only workers to complain if in any case,
after all possibilities of voluntary they were subjected to the case.
settlement shall have been Since the current pandemic is not
tried.”. Only if the rules and just a simple problem to be solved
regulations that are claimed to by simple solutions. The health of
be violated are according to the workers as the priority is anyway
the provisions of the Secretary a part of the Labor Code and must
of labor and employment. This be followed in any way.
article was amended by the
republic act no 6715 where it
discusses the rights of the
employees and employers. It
also aims to strengthen the
employee's rights to join
organizations as long as it will
not violate any of the
management prerogatives.
Unknown. February 2021. Philippines: Discrimination Against Workers with HIV. Hrw.org.
Patino, F. (2021, January 26). DOLE says no minimum wage hike petitions yet.
Industrial Global Union (2020) Nexperia workers win collective bargaining after protest.