Mitrokhin archive lal bahadur shastri pdf

Continue
We bring you a few lines from the book, Mitrokhin Archive II: The KGB and the World, which created a controversy over the weekendKGB code after Shastri's sudden death.... Congressional leaders chose Indira Gandhi (code name VANO from the KGB), ... with which they could manipulate the will. Unification of the left, campaign financeMoskev strategy in 1966 for the Indian elections the following year was based on the support of
the CPI and the breakaway Communist Party of India, the Marxist (CPM), to unite in a left-wing alliance against Ms. Gandhi and the congress government. In addition to subsidizeing the CPI and some other left-wing groups during the 1967 election campaign, the KGB also funded campaigns by several agents and confidential contacts within Conga. Modin has discredited criticsin an attempt to discredit SK Patil, one of the leading
anti-communists in the Congress syndicate, sending a doctored letter from the US Consul General in Mumbai to the US ambassador to Delhi, in which he refers to Patil's political intrigues with the Pakistanis and the large US subsidies allegedly given to him. CPI more than supports CongressIn July 1969, it nationalized fourteen commercial banks. Desai was dismissed as finance minister and resigned as deputy prime minister. The
CPI, emboldened by Moscow, has turned its support behind Mrs Gandhi. By infiltrating its members and sympathizers into the left-wing Congress Forum for Socialist Action (codenamed KGB Sector), the CPI decided to gain a position of influence within the ruling party. Trade of NationsSymdicate indicated that Ms. Gandhi intended to sell India to the Soviet Union and used her chief private secretary, Parmeshwar Narain Haksar, as a
direct link to Moscow and the Soviet Embassy. From 1967 to 1973, Haksar, a former protégé of Krishna Menon, was Mrs Gandhi's most trusted adviser. The leftist Hiss advocates a left-wing turn in Ms. Gandhi's politics, however, out of his socialist beliefs rather than manipulation by the KGB. But he and Ms. Gandhi were less picky than Nehru when he interfered with the democratic system and structure of government to achieve their
ideological goals. If you can't beat them, join themMohan Kumaramangalam seemed to be implementing the 'thesis' that he had first argued in 1964: that since the CPI could not gain power on its own, as many of its members and sympathizers as possible should enter Congress to make common cause with 'progressive' congressmen and force the party leadership to implement socialist policies. Another leader of the Congress Forum
for Socialist Action was hired in 1971 as a CARRO agent and paid about 100,000 rupees a year. Home away from homeIn the early 1970s, the KGB's presence in India became the largest in the world outside the Soviet bloc. Indira Gandhi did not reduce the number of Soviet diplomats and business officials, allowing the KGB and GRU as much cover as possible as they wished. Like many other states, India had no objection to the
admission of Soviet intelligence officers who had been expelled by less hospitable regimes. In kind and in cashThe Prime Minister probably did not pay much attention to the dubious origins of some of the funds that went to the treasury of Congress. This was a matter she left mostly to her main fundraiser, Lalit Narayan Mishra, who - though she no doubt didn't realize it - also accepted Soviet money. On at least one occasion, a
secret donation of 2 million rupees from the Politburo Congress (R) was personally delivered after midnight by new Delhi PR line leader Leonid Shebarshin. Another million rupees were given on the same occasion to the newspapers that supported Mrs Gandhi. Mom's boy, India Gandhi, despite his own modest lifestyle, depended on the money he had collected from various sources to fund Congress (R). So did her son and anointed
heir, Sanjay, whose misguided ambition to build India's popular car and become India's Henry Ford depended on government contributions. Trade, subsidies, well-wishersCovert CPI funding seems to be unaffected. By 1972, the import and export trade established by the CPI a decade earlier had contributed more than 10 million rupees to party funds for trade with the Soviet Union. Other secret subsidies, totaling at least 1.5 million
rupees, went to state Communist Parties, individuals and media associated with the CPI. Money transferIn the mid-1970s Soviet funds for CPI were handed over by the operational officers of the headquarters of New Delhi to a senior member of the national council of the party code called BANKIR in many different places. Well countedRajeshwar Rao, Secretary General of the CPI from 1964 to 1990, subsequently provided income for
the amount received. Other substantial sums went to the communist All-India Congress of Trade Unions. Production approvalSuay of the KGB files, until 1973 he had ten Indian newspapers on his payroll (which cannot be identified for legal reasons) as well as a press agency under its control. During 1972, the KGB claimed to have planted 3,789 articles in Indian newspapers - probably more than in any other country in the non-
communist world. Among the KGB's top confidential contacts in the press was one of India's most influential journalists, codenamed NOK. Nok, taken as a confidential contact in 1976 by A. A. Arkhipov, was subsequently processed by two PR officers of the line operating under journalistic cover. Contact with him ended in 1980 due to his ill health. Our man India was also one of the most favorable environments for Soviet frontline
organizations. From 1966 to 1986 he was head of the most important of them, the World Peace Council (WPC), the Indian communist Romesh Chandra.THE MITROKHIN ARCHIVE II: The KGB and the World by Christopher Andrews and Vasili Mitrokhin published by Penguin Books UK than a week ago, I Hindi film 'Tashkent Files'. This film is reportedly about the mystery surrounding the death of India's second prime minister, Shri.
Lal Bahadur Shastri.In my opinion, it's a very bad movie for many reasons. The cut, the script and the story could have been much better. As far as research goes, the film does get a few things right – like cuts to Shastri's body, the body turned blue/black suggesting that he was probably poisoned, no autopsy/post-mortem examination was done, suspicious timing of Dr. Chug's death and cooking Ramnath, etc. It does not take a great
researcher to reveal this information, how it is possible to find all these facts, and more, by simply searching Google. But on the other hand, it takes considerable effort and research to speculate what forces might be behind Shastri's alleged murder [Translation: Mr Shastri]. And that's where the movie is so pitiful. Vivek Agnihotri, the director-producer-screenwriter of the film, got the historical context so wrong that the film ended up
being nothing more than propaganda. The film begins with the defection of Russian former intelligence official Vasily Mitrokhin. Since the work of the film relies heavily on Mitrokhin and his archive/papers, it is important to understand his background. Mitrokhin joined the MGB (as the KGB was known until 1953), the intelligence service of Soviet Russia, in 1948 as a foreign intelligence officer. After his disappointing performance, he
was demoted and sent to the KGB archive department. This department has been placed in all closed files of previous foreign intelligence operations. From 1972 he began copying the contents of important classified documents by hand into pieces of paper, taking them to his house, writing them at night and hiding them under the floor. He did it for 12 years, until then he had written nearly 25,000 pages of classified information. He left
the KGB in 1985. In 1992, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, or USSR, he took his copied documents and defected to the United Kingdom. A few years later, he co-wrote a book called 'Sword and Shield' with Christopher Andrew, a British news historian, based on his copied documents. After Mitrokhin's death in 2004, He wrote another book called The World Went Our Way, which, among other things, details the KGB's covert
operations in India. [Also published under the title 'KGB and the World: Mitrokhin Archive II'] In short, this is the story of Mitrokhin and his archive. Or should I say that's what we've been told. The film not only begins with the story of Mitrokhin, but also an 8-10min monologue towards the end of the film and the title cards are based solely on Mitrokhin's archive. So what's the problem with the movie? Why do I call it propaganda? Well,
the movie makes extensive notes based on Mitrokhin archives or worse, based on nothing at all. The film suggests that Soviet Russia killed Shastri so that India could turn into a socialist country!! Here's the relevant dialogue from the film: Let's talk about motives now. Shastri her to death ke 10 saalon ke andar India ko phir to colonize kiya gaya. Yes, India has once again become a colony. [Translation: Let's talk about motives now. In
the 10 years since Mr. Shastri's death, India has been colonized again. Yes, India has once again become a colony.] And what is the basis of this statement? The 42nd Amendment to India's Constitution passed in 1976, amending the preamble and changing India's description from a sovereign democratic republic to a sovereign, socialist secular democratic republic. The film's claims are ridiculous for three reasons: i. If Russia's
motive for killing Shammedi in 1966 was to make India a socialist state, why did they wait another 10 years to force India to add the word socialist to the constitution?!! ii. The film does not explicitly mention Indira Gandhi, but suggests that it was controlled by the KGB, so her government added the word socialist to the constitution. And since most opposition leaders and intellectuals were in prison during the emergency period, she
could approve the amendment. Well, if that is the case, one has to answer a very simple question: Indira Gandhi lost the 1977 general election and was already prime minister Morarji Desai was the new prime minister. Why didn't he remove the word socialist from the constitution? It was also controlled by Russia?!! And guess what? The word socialist is still present in the Constitution today !!! So does this mean that all the PM of 1976
is controlled by Russia? Since Pradhan Sewak [Translation: Prime Minister/Aide (what the current prime minister himself calls)] has not removed the word 'socialist' from the constitution, Agnihotri will call Modi a Russian puppet too??!! iii. There is absolutely no logical reason to jump forward 10 years after the alleged murder and cite the event as a guide to solving Shastri's alleged murder. I wonder how he made the jump to 1976!!
According to this logic, it can also be said that the economic reforms of 1991 (globalization, liberalization) to make India a capitalist economy are evidence of the CIA's complicity in the murder of Shastri Ji !!! After all, if Russia can wait 10 years, then the US can wait 25 years too! This is a kind of absurd and shallow research conducted by Vivek Agnihotri and his team. Towards the end of the film, the protagonist, Ragini Phule, displays
the book 'KGB and the World: Mitrokhin Archive II' and says: Jab 1992 me USSR toota, uske baad Mitrokhin not 25,000 KGB to secret documents Britain ko diya. Uske baad Britain me aur Italy me Mitrokhin Commission bithaya gaya jiske baad jitne corrupt politicians, leaders unke against cases of chale. [Translation: After the disintegration of the USSR in 1992, Mitrokhin handed over 25,000 KGB documents to Britain, after which the
Mitrokhin Commission was established in Britain and Italy. Many cases have been recorded against corrupt politicians and leaders]. Let's now look at the story of Mitrokhin and his archives with a critical eye. If anyone believes Mitrokhin's story of how he copied the contents of classified documents, then one would have to believe that he was able to copy classified documents from 1972 until his retirement in 1985 without ever being a
suspect. Mitrokhin explains that he took notes on pieces of paper, stuffed them in his shoes, wrote them down at home, and hid them under the floor. He defected to the UK in 1992. During that time, 20 years after he had all this classified information, he claims to have not contacted any foreign intelligence. In other words, he had all this information but decided not to do anything about it!! Instead, he decided to hide these notes in his
own home, which, if found, would mean a death sentence. Hiding incriminating evidence in your own home for 20 years is more than stupid; something you wouldn't expect from someone who works in an intelligence agency like the KGB. After all, Mitrokhin argues that the KGB was a very effective and ruthless spy agency that successfully infiltrated and spied on the governments of many countries. Would such an effective agency be
sloppy enough to miss what's been going on under their noses for 20 years? It would be different if Mitrokhin smuggled classified information once or twice. But getting away with it for 13 years (1972-1985) is something that is very hard to believe. There are other problems with his story. B. Raman, founding member of india's external intelligence agency Research & Analysis Wing (R& AW) and former head of the
counter-terrorism division, also had trouble believing Mitrokhin's story. Here's what he had to say about it: Mitrokhin served in the operations department of the KGB's Foreign Intelligence Directorate until 1956. He was then removed from the operations department due to his disappointing results and posted to the archives, where he continued to operate until his retirement in 1985 – a total of 29 years. During this period, he was not
re-posted abroad. He wasn't even sent on foreign trips. It speaks of his poor professional reputation in the organization. Would a person considered incompetent and untrustworthy to work at work have access to hundreds of sensitive operating files every day? Unlikely.A rule of caution generally followed by intelligence agencies is that they send only non-actionable files of administrative and analytical branches to an archive or
recording room. Operational files are not sent to the archive, even after the operation is complete. They remain in the custody of the relevant operations force...... All intelligence services are more or less governed by the same to protect the identity of their resources and how the operation operates. In addition, no one, however trustworthy, may work alone in a branch containing operational files. In general, at least two people must be
present to avoid the possibility that one person will take advantage of being alone to copy or photograph files. If Mitrokhin's story is to be believed, none of these security measures have been followed in the KGB. The operational files of branches dealing with dozens of countries could be kept in one place in the central archives, personal data and details of how they worked were kept in files, and Mitrokhin was able to work alone day
after day, hour after hour - undisturbly - and in the evening he took notes from the files and took notes. According to him, it took 12 years for all the files to be transferred from one building to another, which gave him enough time to go through many of them and take notes. It's very hard for one to believe all this. Amy Knight, an American historian who has been called the leading KGB scholar in the West, noted - Did the KGB have any
reports on time accounting or performance like all bureaucracies? Nar's volume of Materials Mitrokhin is said to have copied manually (tens of thousands of documents) makes one wonder how he could find time. He adds - Incredibly, due to strict security rules in all soviet archives, no one noticed what Mitrokhin was doing all day or checking on him when he went home at night. Needless to say, Mitrokhin's story doesn't seem credible
at all. It is also important to look at the historical context: After the defeat of the Wassa powers (Nazis = Hitler and Japanese) in World War II, the US and Soviet Russia fought against what became known as the Cold War. The US, the British, and their Western European Allies (NATO) have engaged in intelligence operations and proxy wars against Soviet Russia and its Eastern European allies. Since the late 1940s, the British and
Russians have fought on opposite sides. With this important background information, let's now re-examine the dialogue piece by piece. As you are going to see, there are several errors just in this dialog!! I. Jab 1992 me USSR toota. [Translation: After the collapse of the USSR in 1992] Wrong. The USSR ceased to exist 26. no 1992.ii. uske baad Mitrokhin no 25,000 KGB to secret documents Britain ko diya. [Translation: Mitrokhin
handed over 25,000 secret KGB documents to Britain] WRONG AGAIN. Mitrokhin did not hand over any classified documents to Britain; or release their photocopies of the original documents. He handed him the notes he had made; documents do not. There's a big difference between them. If Mitrokhin copied the original documents and then handed them over to the British, that would be credibility. Higher. But despite being
surrounded by copiers in his office, Mitrokhin decided to make handwritten copies of the documents for 12 years !!! So now you have to trust yourself. And one must assume that he faithfully copied all the documents without committing intentional or unintentional errors.iii. Uske baad Britain me aur Italy me Mi Mi Mitrokhin Commission bithaya gaya jiske baad jitne corrupt politicians, leaders unke against chale cases [Translation: after
which the Mitrokhin Commission was established in Britain and Italy. Many cases have been recorded against corrupt politicians and leaders]. [In fact, at an earlier point in the film, one may find a very similar dialogue – Mitrokhin archives the world's best counterintelligence report hai. Uski wajah se Britain aur Italy me tamaam cases chale. Agar Indians Mitrokhin archives padh le na, on civil war hojayega. Translation: Mitrokhin archives
are considered the world's best counterintelligence reports. On the basis of these documents, many court cases have been registered. If indians read the Mitrokhin archives, it will lead to civil war ]This kind of dialogue-writing is so blatantly dishonest. This is what is known as selective reporting. FACTS: The Mitrokhin Commission was established in Italy; not in Britain. Following the upheaval caused by the allegations in Mitrokhin's
book Sword and Shield, a parliamentary commission was set up in 2002 to investigate claims that some Italian politicians were KGB agents and on the KGB payroll. What the film does not say is that even after four years of investigation the Commission found no concrete evidence to support Mitrokhin's allegations, and so it was finally disbanded in 2006 ! Not a single political figure has been exposed!! But thanks to this dialogue, it
looks as if the alleged KGB agents have been punished. Can such a director be relied upon to find the truth about Shastri's death? The story is even more interesting: Mitrokhin was chaired by Senator Paolo Guzzanti. In addition to the Mitrokhin archives, the commission relied on various other sources, including a consultant named Mario Scaramella. In late 2006, consultant Scaramella was arrested and charged with defamation after
wiretapping phone calls between him and Senator Paol Guzzanti were made public by the Italian press, showing that they both planned to discredit various political opposition figures by claiming to be KGB agents. In other words, not a single person named in the Mitrokhin archive was sent to prison, but whoever tried to put them in jail eventually landed there alone! And in 2006, a new commission was created to investigate the
Mitrokhin Commission over allegations that it was manipulated for political purposes. So the hunters became hunted! Hahahaha!! But Vivek Agnihotri saw that it is advisable to hide these facts!! What happened in Britain is also very fascinating. B. Raman, founding member of R& AW, notes: It is That MI-6 and MI-5, the Internal Security Service, were not able to screen any of the individuals mitrokhin identified as KGB
agents. Nor did they consider it necessary to hear or hear them to comment on the allegations made against them by Mitrokhin. Instead, MI-5 and MI-6 suggested in 1996 that the notes mitrokhin had brought should be given to Professor Christopher Andrew for joint publication with Mitrokhin after appropriate editing.. Let me explain: The British intelligence services and the British government have decided not to keep an end to
anyone listed in the Mitrokhin archive in court. Instead, they chose Chistopher Andrew, the official historian of MI5, to co-author the book. Why? Since mitrokhin's archive consists of his notes and does not contain any official document or photocopy, it cannot be considered as evidence in court. This in itself shows that MI6 itself did not consider the Mitrokhin archives credible enough to prosecute or even question alleged KGB agents.
But they used the material as a propaganda tool against their old enemy Russia. This is what is known as PSYWAR. Classic Cold War techniques. So trusting the Mitrokhin archives requires that one also put a huge amount of faith in British intelligence agencies, i.e. the British intelligence agencies. Their word at face value would be as stupid and ridiculous as believing the word of Pakistan that India is engaged in cross-border
terrorism in Pakistan!! Of course, the British will publish material that will show the Russians in a bad light. What else do you expect?!! Christopher Andrew, co-author of Mitrokhin's books, enrolled in the Security Service (MI-5) in 2003!! In 2005, the book KGB and the World: Mitrokhin Archive II was published, which talks about KGB agents in India. In other words, someone who gets paid by British MI-5 has been accused of telling the
truth about his enemy (Russia) to a country that had previously colonized (India) !! Hmm.... that sounds very plausible, really !!!! And did I mention that Vasily Mitrokhin's original handwritten notes have not yet been declassified by the British? But that's okay. The British wouldn't lie. They never lied !!! Let's believe what they publish!! Will someone please explain the concept of conflict of interest to this idiot filmmaker? Next, protagonist
Ragini Phule presents - Mitrokhin to report ko world ka best counterintelligence report mana jata hai lekin India me ..... ushhhh !!! Daba do, sab daba do [Translation: Mitrokhin archives are considered the best in the world counter-intelligence reports, but in India it was suppresed]. The world's best counterintelligence? Hahaha. Well, here's another interesting fact. Before defecting to the UK, Mikterín turned to the CIA with his archives
and applied for asylum in America. He told a story so fanciful that CIA officers deemed it completely fraudulent. His documents were examined and rejected by the CIA!! In other words, the KGB's fiercest rival, the CIA, which has always looked for new ways to discredit the Russians and portray them as evil, did not buy what Mitrokhin was selling! Turns out the CIA didn't believe Mitrokhin's story at all. Not even a founding member of
india's R&AW intelligence service, B. Raman. But Vivek Agnihotri calls this report the best counterintelligence report in the world, !!! In fact, this row is repeated twice in the film. The film also does not explain why the Russians decided to kill Shastri her in the Soviet Union, that is, on their own soil? Would a country/intelligence service want to kill a foreign leader on its soil and be blamed for it? The film states that the KGB to clean
duniya me jitne spies, usme sabse jyada spies India me [Translation: Of all the countries that the KGB spied on, the largest number of spies were in India]. If that was the case, why didn't shastri kill her in India? As I said, the film does not even try to answer this fundamental question. In my opinion, the CIA is a good suspect in the alleged murder of Shastri her. I say this because the CIA has a long history of toppling democratically
elected governments and replacing them with puppet governments or dictators, indulging in proxy wars, political assassinations, false flag operations, terror, and more. For example, the CIA overthrew Iranian Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh in 1953, President Jacob Arbenz of Gautemla in 1954, Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba of Congo in 1961, Salvador Allende of Chile, and many others. From the CIA's point of view, it
would be perfectly logical to kill Shastri jia in the Soviet Union and try to drive a wedge between India and Russia. This would help get India away from Soviet Russia and into Western orbit in the Cold War. If the Americans ever wanted to kill Shastri her, Tashkent would be the perfect place. I'd like to make it clear that this is just speculation. However, in the film, the CIA only comes once. And guess what? Shouldn't it be hard to guess
!!! The film gives a clean chit to the CIA in shastri's !!! This line says it all - Tum log kya samajhte him? Sare assassinations cia hi karwata hai? Aur bhi agencies hai [Translation: Do you think all murders are carried out only by the CIA? There are other agencies] !!! With so many mistakes/lies in the movie, one has to ask the question – Are they real mistakes? Or did the director know about it and keep doing it? Well, at the very end of
the film, several title cards show multiple accusations from the archives of Mitrokhin; for example, Indira Gandhi received millions from the KGB. And then comes the point - The authenticity of the claim in this report is not proven !!! Cha!! After baseing his entire conclusion and conspiracy theory on the dubious and controversial mitrokhin archives, acknowledges that these claims have not been proven. This proves that the director
knew the claims were not substantiated, but that didn't stop him from using it in his film. This is because as a director, Vivek Agnihotri knows that it's the visuals and dialogues of the film that matter, not the disclaimer/title cards. And so he continued his despicable propaganda. In my opinion, this article proves that this film was not so much a film about Shastri's alleged murder, but rather a Russian-bashing conspiracy theory. It seems
that this was the real intention behind the making of this film, while Shastri's death was reduced to a subplot. The timing of the release of this film is also very interesting. The film was released 12 April 2019. If you recall, the election began the previous day, the eleventh. Is it just a co-incidence that the film portrays the congressional leadership as a slave to the Russians on the eve of the general election? That's not likely. Vivek
Agnihotri is a failed director and filmmaker. He's made only five films in the last 15 years. In fact, he will acknowledge this fact for himself. He said: I didn't have a job. No one in Bollywood gave me any work!! He goes on to say – This movie I think should be considered R& D film-making !!! In fact, this film should be seen as an R&D film of propaganda and psyche. More recently, he has become famous for targeting
leftists, speaking out openly about Hindu cases, and taking on radical Muslims in television debates. His refusal to include more information about the CIA in the film along with blatant lies against the Russians could be a hint of things to come in the future. In my opinion, he will have an openly pro-Hindu posture and continue to actively cover up the bloody history of the American Empire and the CIA. And almost all Hindus do not notice
his deliberate lies, because unfortunately at the moment when a prominent individual takes a prou Hindu attitude, most Hindus go crazy and all logic, research, analysis pops out the window. Trusting Hindus support this individual to the extreme at the cost of facts. A very bad trend for the India.As when it comes to Indian politics, there's one politician who always mentions and quotes from Mitrokhin's archives. It's none other than
Subramanian Swamy!! Just the guy you'd expect to do something like that. This dialogue from 'Tashkent Files' aptly describes director Vivek Agnihotri – I've done with this ethical... Kisko chahiye facts? Yahaan sab chalta hai [Translation: I'm done with this ethical. Nobody cares about the facts. Everything is now a fair game (i.e. fake news, etc.)] !! This line should be the subtitle of the movie !!! Please share this article among your
friends and relatives. And help uncover this sick propaganda hit-piece disguised as a movie. As the character in the film says - Idiots hai who jinko sach with darr lagta hai. Darna's reputation kyunki agar reputation ko roka na jaaye toh who aisa sach ban jaati hai jiske saamne sach bhi jhooth lagne lagta hai [Translation: Only idiots fear the truth. (Original post by Rahul Arya, Bellary, Karnataka) Reference:B. Raman's must-read three-
part article on the secrets of Mitrokhin: //in..rediff.com/news/2005/sep/27raman.htm . KGB sales Amy Knight: . . historian)April 5, 2019: . Youtube video: . . .

rokisepadasutamikix.pdf
building_construction_rangwala_download.pdf
mebajowokonekokudupozoj.pdf
definition_of_credibility_in_research.pdf
average_value_of_a_function_calculator.pdf
ritual de confirmacion
ejercicios de funciones racionales pdf
meio ambiente pdf download
identitas nasional makalah pdf
plants vs zombies android game download
cae key word transformation worksheets pdf
workshop manual free download
jaw realignment surgery cost ireland
gloomhaven_scenario_book.pdf
xabowuvus.pdf
zuxanob.pdf