586106

editorial2015
GSC0010.1177/2043610615586106Global Studies of ChildhoodWatson et al.

Editorial

Global Studies of Childhood

2015, Vol. 5(2) 115­–121
Children and young people in © The Author(s) 2015
Reprints and permissions:
times of conflict and change: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/2043610615586106
Child rights in the Middle East gsc.sagepub.com

and North Africa

Debbie Watson
University of Bristol, UK

Kristen Cheney
Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands

Heba Raouf Ezzat

Cairo University, Egypt

The Arab Spring was not only about citizens toppling the regime in Tunisia, occupying Tahrir
Square in Egypt and the streets of Yemen and Bahrain, and militant confrontations in Libya. It was
about a generation that had dreams and that is now facing challenges to live in dignity. Not only
young people, but children too were part of the uprisings, whether joining their parents or joining
the dissent against their parents’ wishes. Others who had no one to encourage or discourage decided
for themselves: street children, child street vendors and school pupils were present on the streets in
many instances of pacifist demonstrations or violent clashes since 2011, including in Syria which
has turned into a devastating prolonged violent conflict. Their role remains neglected in Arab
Spring commentaries, and their suffering has not invited the in-depth study it deserves. The extent
to which their involvement in different political contexts has also influenced children’s and young
people’s memories and identities has also escaped thorough documentation.
The aim of this special issue is to bring together articles from established and emergent academ-
ics and practitioners who have direct experience and empirical data on the lives of children in the
Middle East and North African (MENA) regions, particularly since the Arab Spring uprisings. Our
critical focus is on the role of children and young people in influencing political and cultural
change in the region and the impacts upon them of conflict and political change.

Corresponding author:
Debbie Watson, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8, Priory Rd, Bristol BS8 1TZ, UK.
Email: debbie.watson@bristol.ac.uk

Downloaded from gsc.sagepub.com by guest on June 5, 2016

116 Global Studies of Childhood 5(2)

This ambition emerged from a capacity building collaboration between the guest editors who
were partners in a European Union (EU) Tempus-funded project: Diploma in Public Policy and
Child Rights (2010–2013). Two universities in Egypt (Cairo University and Assiut University)
and two in Jordan (Jordan University and Hashemite University) with European partner universi-
ties (University of Bristol, England; Free University of Berlin, Germany; Maastricht University,
Netherlands and the International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam,
The Hague, Netherlands) as well as Research in Practice in England and United Nations Children’s
Fund (UNICEF) in Egypt and Jordan came together to develop a postgraduate diploma for advo-
cates and children’s rights practitioners in Egypt and Jordan to address the role of policymaking
in facilitating the articles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC;
UN, 1990) to be recognized in domestic law and in rights-based practice with children and young
people.
The project timescale enabled first-hand experience of what became known as the ‘Arab Spring’
that began in Tunisia on the 18th of December 2010, with protests occurring from the 25th of
January 2011 in Egypt where, in particular, the protesters in Tahrir Square, Cairo, became a symbol
of hope for democracy and equality across the region. Witnessing the changes that occurred across
the MENA region and the differential impacts of such changes challenged the project in respect of
the political upheavals that occurred and the lack of consistent policymaking processes that resulted
– even as it underlined the importance and urgency of the project’s objectives. Yet these changes
and challenges were unequally felt across Jordan and Egypt and across other MENA countries. We
also became intensely aware as a team that media and academic coverage of the role of children
and young people in the ‘revolutions’ and protests swayed from positioning the young as political
innovators (Ezbawy, 2012; Wardany, 2012; Youniss et al., 2013) mobilizing resources through
modern means of social media (Hassan, 2012; Herrera, 2011, 2014; Howard et al., 2011; Stepanova,
2011) or as passive victims of military and police interventions or of circumstances of poverty and
social inequalities (Ammar, 2009; Campante and Chor, 2012; Elkoussi and Bakheet, 2011; Kotb et
al., 2011; Nada and El Daw, 2010). What these polarized narratives provided was an idealized and
stylized view of children and childhoods through conflict that failed to capture the untold everyday
stories in humanistic and empathetic ways that recognized the agency and resilience of children
and young people. While many published studies of children in the MENA uprisings pointed to the
presence of children in streets, their need for protection and the impact of the instable and violent
circumstances left on their safety, whether during and after the uprising or in the following pro-
longed street clashes, little has been written about their agency as being a component of the wave
and their participation as a reason to reconsider the status of children as ‘junior’ citizens and politi-
cal actors (Ezzat, 2007).

The state of childhood studies

It is important to highlight how children are generally conceptualized in social sciences today. A
strong link exists between how children are ‘imagined’ and the wider modernist imagination.
Recent approaches of the study of childhood include the socially constructed child, the tribal
child, the minority group child and the social structural child (James et al., 1998). These four
models of the child also prefigure four dichotomous theoretical themes: agency–structure, univer-
salism–particularism, local–global and continuity–change (James et al., 1998). We can add, based
on our work here, two categories: the ‘political child’ and the ‘nomad child’, the first describing
children caught in situations of violent instability that do not reach the stage of armed conflict in
terms of civil war, and find themselves engaged in political actions or in direct relation with
political structures and agents without support of family or protection of laws, and the second

Downloaded from gsc.sagepub.com by guest on June 5, 2016

Watson et al. 117

referring to refugee children who do not enjoy the citizenship of the locations they inhabit and
where international law is not a sufficient umbrella when it comes to the complexity of risk situ-
ations or the capacity of hosting countries to provide basic services – an alarming phenomena in
the Arab world today.
Many reasons lead to the dominant view of children as subjects rather than agents of change in
political change research, mainly because the ‘political’ is seen as a rational sphere, while it is
believed that children are still maturing and lack full reason, and their will is not independent. It is
also a sphere of contestation, antagonism and power believed to be unsuitable for children to enter.
Children are by definition apolitical in the dominant paradigms:

Adults tend to view children as a largely apolitical social group occupying the apolitical space of childhood,
yet the exclusion of children from discussions of politics and nationalism belie this assumption […]
Children’s rights discourses tend to reify constructions of apolitical childhood in such a way that the
systematic exclusion of children from the full rights of citizenship receives little notice. (Cheney, 2007:
12–13)

Events like the Arab Spring directly confront this notion. Political socialization as a social and
educational process is the utmost we can find under the title of politics when it comes to children.
Their presence in domestic violent political scenes is also overlooked and their voice is usually
muted because the state is assumed to be the vehicle for securing their wellbeing and it is not
expected that it would consider them part of the ‘state of exception’ when it takes full command of
defining sovereignty and exercising it regardless of law (Agamben, 1998). Yet it usually does, and
they are caught in emerging situations of political conflict, with no parties allowed to interfere – as
compared, for instance, to spaces of war when laws, political bodies and international agencies
have a clear role (Greenbaum et al., 2006). It is no secret that some of the international organiza-
tions keep a low profile in such times of uncertainty for fear of being banned from working in
the respective country where the state of politics is exceptionally harming of the basic rights of
children, including the very basic of all rights: the right to life.
While national and international laws and organizations can uphold rights and defend entitle-
ments, we still live in a liquid modern condition, where the remoteness of global systemic struc-
tures is coupled with unstructured and under-defined fluid states of the immediate setting of life,
politics and human togetherness (Bauman, 2000: 16–52). Children are the most vulnerable social
segment in such liquid conditions (Bauman, 2000: 16–52).

The articles
The articles in this issue present different and challenging perspectives on children and young
people’s rights in Egypt, Jordan, Algeria, Tunisia and Palestine. Some of the articles chosen present
a commentary on the country’s progress towards addressing children’s rights such as Janette
Habashi’s article which reports the challenges faced by the incoming Palestinian government to
ensure that the Palestinian Basic Law incorporates the articles of the UNCRC. She identifies the
reservations likely to be made, particularly in addressing the challenge of universalism/secularism
enshrined in the UNCRC and the cultural relativism and religiosity in Sharia Law. While Habashi
offers a future-focused commentary, Mahmoud Boussena and Habib Tiliouine chart the progresses
made and challenges faced in Algeria, where reservations to certain articles are exemplified by a
state focus on the Islamic faith as the state religion and the importance of family and the religious
commitment of fathers in defining freedom of thought for children. Algeria did not witness Arab
Spring uprisings in 2010/2011, yet many observers claim that it had the first Arab Spring in 1991

Downloaded from gsc.sagepub.com by guest on June 5, 2016

118 Global Studies of Childhood 5(2)

when, through elections – unlike in other countries where opposition was satisfied with its role –
Algerians witnessed a sweeping victory of the Islamic party, the Front Islamic du Salut (FIS), that
promised a structural change in power. The response of the regime was to totally nullify those
elections and later ban FIS. After a decade of armed conflict, stability was maintained and the
political status quo has been largely unchallenged. As such, this article reads quite differently from
others that have focused on issues of conflict, change, agency and activism by children and young
people. While they report incremental gains in some areas of children’s rights, the authors acknowl-
edge the ongoing challenges to the country of addressing children’s freedom from violence in the
home and school, and they identify schools as possible agents of further change and advocacy for
children’s protection and participation rights.
Four of the articles provide empirical insights into the lives of children and young people in the
MENA countries considered. For example, in the article from Jordan, Hind Farahat and Kristen E
Cheney explore the reasons why orphans’ protests of their inferior citizenship were so short-lived
and failed to transform orphans’ social disadvantage, which is largely due to the pervasive patriar-
chy and tribalism embedded in the state system under a veneer of democracy that only upholds the
status quo and entitlements of the powerful. The article from Jordan and the articles from Tunisia
and Egypt focus on young people’s involvements in uprisings and challenges to the state. In the
Jordanian case, this is by a particular group of young people excluded by society to address funda-
mental questions of identity and belonging; while the article by Barbara Lethem Ibrahim, Betsy
Mesard and Leah Hunt-Hendrix in Egypt reports a mobilizing of young people to volunteer and
engage in political activism in ways that challenge established norms of youth social service in
Egypt through organized movements such as Resala. The article reports the extent to which young
people felt empowered as Egyptian citizens, occupying their own political and social space, largely
marked by the occupations of Tahrir Square. The postscript is a reminder of the durability of such
political movements as, despite yet more upheaval and unrest in Egypt, Resala has survived. While
focused on the activism of these young people, this article also highlights the situation of children
under military-led regimes, where there are elections yet there is no democracy. Such regimes
undermine children’s rights under strict hegemony over public space and education, where many
social and cultural rights of children are undermined. Furthermore, their protection rights lose
priority when the regimes face dissent, with the result that the resultant security measures corrode
basic rights of citizens – most severely those of children. Challenges to political processes operate
on many levels: as one young volunteer commented, the 2011 ‘revolution’ in Egypt was ‘a revolu-
tion of politics (overthrowing the regime), a revolution of cleaning up the country, and a revolution
of the self (Ibrahim et al., this volume).
The article by Fatma Jabberi and Sofia Laine also focuses on the role of young volunteers in
creating dialogic spaces of cultural exchange and learning through their participation in the World
Social Forum (WSF) held in Tunis in 2013. Through the combination of the auto-ethnographic
voice of Jabberi (a young Tunisian volunteer) and Laine’s ethnographic field notes, the authors theo-
rize the WSF as a ‘contact zone’ where, through translation and interpretation of knowledge and
practices, Laine was enabled to enter the experience of the young volunteers and open up North–
South dialogue in a non-hegemonic manner. The notion of the ‘contact zone’ operates in this article
in a number of ways from the local to the global and across the research relationship that flourished
through bringing the two different voices together. From a methodological perspective, this is an
excellent example of co-produced writing where neither one voice nor the other dominates.
The final article in this volume is the only article that addresses the experiences of younger
children as it reports experiences of 11- to 13-year-old boys and girls in Balata refugee camp in the
West Bank of Palestine. Like Jabberi and Laine, David J Marshall utilized ethnographic methods
to capture boys’ and girls’ everyday use of space within the confines of the camp – in particular
focusing on concepts such as mobility and fear of violence to illuminate the gendered restrictions

Downloaded from gsc.sagepub.com by guest on June 5, 2016

Watson et al. 119

placed upon the children concerned. What is of particular interest is that while it would appear girls
are more constrained and confined within the home environment, they have utilized this situation
to enhance their learning advantage in order to achieve greater academic successes. Boys, on the
other hand, appear to be disadvantaged by the expectations placed upon them to occupy wider
spaces and to defend their homes and neighbourhoods. Yet what emerges from both accounts is the
agency of the children, whom in engaging in local debates about space within the camp have also
engaged in political, religious and gendered debates.

Common themes
A unique aspect of this collection is thus its use of intersectionality – attention to the ways various
dominant institutions, systems of oppression or discriminatory practices such as race, class and
gender interact with age and generation – to convey MENA children’s subjective experiences of
the Arab Spring. Gender is hugely important across the articles in respect of children and young
people’s experiences. The very fact that ‘youth’ is often defined as ‘male’ indicates that girls and
young women can be marginalized in contexts of struggle and social change (Ibrahim et al., this
volume), and although their lives may be adversely impacted by the patriarchy in which MENA
societies are embedded (Farahat and Cheney, this volume), these pieces demonstrate that young
people find creative ways to resist and even subvert gendered oppression (Marshall, this volume).
The gendered and generational use of space was also a key issue for children’s experiences,
particularly as reported in the occupied Palestinian territories (Marshall, this volume) and the ‘con-
tact zones’ of the WSF in Tunisia (Jabberi and Laine, this volume). There is also a dimension of
urbanity in the articles. Although politics and change encompass all sectors and spaces of a society,
the civil struggles are usually linked with central urban locations, as is the case in the studies
reported here. In better understanding the diversities of MENA childhood experiences, there is also
a need to expand the focus to include children in rural and Bedouin areas. However, taken together,
attention to the intersectionalities reported across the articles provides a much more nuanced and
complex picture of young people’s experiences of the Arab Spring than could be conveyed in
approaches to childhood that take it as the sole social variable and object of analysis.
The impact of religion on children’s experiences is also far greater than might be the case in
other parts of the world, particularly where Sharia law interacts with children’s rights discourses in
sometimes disparate ways (Farahat and Cheney, this volume; Habashi, this volume; Ibrahim et al.,
this volume). The articles in this volume deal honestly and critically with this intersection. The
tension between the legacy of Islamic norms, principles and laws and modern conventions needs
to be resolved within the frame of wide civil deliberations. Many religious opinions have managed
to reconcile different views, yet sometimes issues are polarized beyond need (especially during
elections), or globalized beyond necessity. The issue is not so much Sharia as much as it is cultural
differences and the need for respecting pluralist perspectives, without undermining basic human
rights. Sharia can also be the basis for fostering civic virtues and compassion needed in many
problems related to children in day-to-day life. This dimension has been neglected with the over-
legalization of children’s issues, overstating the State in protection, and undermining social net-
works and even primordial social structures, whose role strengthens in times of crisis and where
religion becomes a key frame of reference.

Future directions
It is obvious from the study of children in many countries today that young people develop new
approaches to cope with the rapid changes in their lives and circumstances. There is also a need for

Downloaded from gsc.sagepub.com by guest on June 5, 2016

120 Global Studies of Childhood 5(2)

a contextual approach so that the study of childhood and youth can add to the understanding of the
spaces and the sectors of modern life in MENA countries. The camp, the playground, the locale of
political dissent, the spaces of deliberation and the dynamics of power, law and morality that govern
in each space are important for ‘locating’ our understanding of children’s issues in times of change.
Many societies are witnessing unprecedented levels of violence and displacement. Regimes that
signed the UNCRC are negligent in adhering to the basic measures of child protection, and civil
society is crippled when sovereignty is at stake and their role is hindered. More research in the
direction of childhood/youth and politics needs to be done but also more attention should be given
to areas outside the mainstream research topics and spatial locations. A comparative approach
between different regions can highlight common problems, not only in the global South but also
between South and North. The case studies here reflect a need for more theoretical research to
develop analytical categories as well as empirical tools to explore emerging problems. Our own
work as editors highlighted commonalities rather than differences in the problems children are fac-
ing in a global age. An outcome of that eye-opening experience is a call for more effort to cover
issues related to childhood, identity, politics and urban injustice.
The articles included in this issue did not cover conflict hot spots like Iraq, Syria and Yemen.
This is itself an indicator that researchers in such countries often give more attention to macro-
issues rather than the everyday lives of their younger citizens. We are considering a future effort
focusing on these cases and the reconstruction of images and revisiting of issues and methodolo-
gies in the light of empirical challenges.
As the changes and transformations in the Arab world are still unfolding, and a clear generation
gap is emerging, children and young people are expected to play a crucial role in shaping the future
of their countries. Any futuristic perspective cannot afford to ignore that, and the measures of
securing and empowering children and young people should be at the heart of any social negotia-
tion to bring civic and civilized peace to a turbulent region.

References
Agamben G (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (trans. D Heller-Roazen). Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
Ammar NH (2009) The relationship between street children and the justice system in Egypt. International
Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 53: 556–573.
Bauman Z (2000) Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Campante FR and Chor D (2012) Why was the Arab world poised for revolution? Schooling, economic
opportunities, and the Arab spring. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 26: 167–187.
Cheney KE (2007) Pillars of the Nation: Child Citizens and Ugandan National Development. Chicago, IL:
The University of Chicago Press.
Elkoussi A and Bakheet S (2011) Volatile substance misuse among street children in Upper Egypt. Substance
Use & Misuse 46: 35–39.
Ezbawy YA (2012) The role of the youth’s new protest movements in the January 25th revolution. IDS
Bulletin 43: 26–36.
Ezzat HR (2007) The road to citizenship: engaging and empowering young people in Egypt. An analytical
desk review report prepared for UNICEF, Cairo, December.
Greenbaum CW, Veerman PE and Bacon-Shnoor N (2006) Protection of Children During Armed Political
Conflict: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Intersentia nv.
Hassan K (2012) Making sense of the Arab spring: Listening to the voices of Middle Eastern activists.
Development 55: 232–238.
Herrera L (2011) Egypt’s revolution 2.0: the Facebook factor (Online). Jadaliyya. Available at: http://www.
jadaliyya.com/pages/index/612/egypts-revolution-2.0_the-facebook-factor

Downloaded from gsc.sagepub.com by guest on June 5, 2016

Watson et al. 121

Herrera L (ed.) (2014) Wired Citizenship: Youth Learning and Activism in the Middle East. New York:
Routledge.
Howard PN, Duffy A, Freelon D, et al. (2011) Opening closed regimes: what was the role of social media dur-
ing the Arab Spring? Available at: http://pitpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/2011_Howard-Duffy-
Freelon-Hussain-Mari-Mazaid_pITPI.pdf
James A, Jenks C and Prout A (1998) Theorising Childhood. Oxford: Polity Press.
Kotb AM, Mohamed AG, Abdel Khalek EM, et al. (2011) Agricultural labor among school children in Rural
Assiut, Egypt. Life Science Journal 8: 332–339.
Nada KH and El Daw AS (2010) Violence, abuse, alcohol and drug use, and sexual behaviors in street chil-
dren of Greater Cairo and Alexandria, Egypt. Aids 24: S39–S44.
Stepanova E (2011) The role of information communication technologies in the Arab Spring, pp. 1–6.
PONARS Eurasia. Available at: http://pircenter.org/kosdata/page_doc/p2594_2.pdf
United Nations (UN) (ed.) (1990) United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Geneva: Office of
the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Wardany Y (2012) The Mubarak regime’s failed youth policies and the January uprising. IDS Bulletin 43:
37–46.
Youniss J, Barber BK and Billen RM (2013) Children in the garden of democracy: The meaning of civic
engagement in today’s Egypt. Journal of Social Science Education 12: 6–13.

Downloaded from gsc.sagepub.com by guest on June 5, 2016