0|Page

People consistently overestimate the

inflation rate. Why?

Researcher Name
Supervisor Name
Date
1|Page

Abstract:

Inflation is a crucial macroeconomic indicator that reflects changes in the value of money over a
certain period of time. The consumer price index exaggerated inflation, according to studies, for
three reasons: it failed to account for consumer substitution, it failed to correctly account for
quality improvements, and it failed to appropriately reflect new items that were introduced into
the market.
Introduction:
Inflation is the gradual reduction of a currency's buying value over time. The increase in the
average price level of a basket of selected goods and services in an economy over time can be
used to calculate a quantitative estimate of the rate at which buying power declines. A rise in the
general level of prices, which is frequently stated as a percentage, signifies that a unit of currency
currently buys less than it previously did.
Inflation is distinguished from deflation, which happens when money's purchasing power rises
but prices fall.it was concluded that consumer price index inflation was overstated by 1.1
percentage points a year as a result of several upward biases, an inability to adequately account
for consumers switching expenditure between different categories, referred to as higher-level
substitution bias.
Background:
Inflation is a common occurrence not only in Canada but in the entire world. Inflation is a
macroeconomic measure that has become a hot topic now a day among economists. In general,
there has been a steady increase in the average price (parkin, 1993). Inflation, on the other hand,
is a state in which there is an excess demand for goods and services in general (lerner in
gunawan, 1995). Understanding what is going on in the economy requires accurate inflation
measurement. It's much more important for someone whose tax or pension is based on an
inflation index. It should come as no surprise, then, that the accuracy of official inflation
statistics is frequently contested. In light of the influence of modern technologies, we looked at
one of the most influential, the us consumer price index (consumer price index). We came to the
conclusion that it has routinely inflated price increases, which might have far-reaching
consequences. It's possible that hundreds of millions of dollars in unnecessary social security and
pension payments were made, while real Gross domestic product (GDP) was continually
overstated. The distortions caused by inaccurately recorded inflation are less clear-cut when it
comes to markets and monetary policy.
2|Page

Application of the theory to the current situation

People overestimate the inflation rate. Why?

Some of the solid reasons why people overestimate the inflation are explained below:
The effect of substitution:
Inflation of 3% indicates that prices have increased by 3% on average. However, some prices
will have climbed by a greater amount, while others will have increased by a lesser amount (or
even decreased). People modify their behavior in reaction to these changes by buying more of
the things that haven't increased in price by much and less of the goods that have grown in price
by a lot: this is known as the substitution effect. As individuals migrate to relatively cheaper
commodities, inflation overestimates the underlying increase in the cost of living.
Unobservable quality improvements:
As we discussed in the "adjusting for quality and size" section previously, inflation must be
calculated like-for-like. Although statisticians try to account for quality improvements, it is
impossible to do so completely. As a result, some unnoticed quality improvements go
unaccounted for. This indicates that inflation exaggerates the genuine cost of living increase.
Example:
This may be shown using the following example: assume you had $100,000 to spend on either
the 2015 amazon website or the bargain-basement 1963 sears catalog your grandmother told you
about. Which one would you pick? Prices were substantially lower in 1963, so you could
3|Page

purchase a lot more items, but it would be low-quality junk that you didn't desire. So, while the
2015 option is significantly more expensive, the improved quality offsets some of the cost.
New products and services:
As time progresses, new items and services become available that were not previously available.
Customers gain as a result of this since they now have another option for spending their money.
The value of the new alternative is not taken into consideration when calculating inflation
figures, despite the fact that these extra commodities may ultimately be included in the "basket
of goods." As a result, inflation exaggerates the genuine increase in the cost of living since it
ignores the fact that consumers are better off as a result of the arrival of new things.
Quality adjustment bias:
Inflation will be exaggerated to the degree that the Consumer Price Index (Consumer price
index) fails to account for quality improvements in the goods and services that consumers use.
The quality adjustment bias is the term used to describe this type of overestimation. Government
statisticians frequently struggle to measure changes in product quality.
Example:
If the design of an air conditioner has improved to the point that it can give out 10% more cold
air without using 10% more power, then a 10% increase in the price of an air conditioner should
not be considered inflation.
Future Predictions:
Inflation causes prices to rise, which reduces your purchasing power. Inflation also has a
negative effect on the value of pensions, savings, and Treasury bills. Real estate and collectables,
for example, are often able to stay up with inflation. When inflation rises, variable interest rates
on loans rise as well.
Conclusion:
As the digital era progresses, the quality of goods and services appears to be increasing not only
in Canada but in the entire world, but consumer purchasing habits are changing at a faster pace.
In light of this, without any methodological modifications, the consumer price index is expected
to continue upwardly skewed. This bias is presently estimated to be in the range of 0.5–1.0
percentage points every year, according to the consensus. The ensuing underestimation of real
GDP might explain why productivity hasn't increased since the financial crisis of 2009. The
consequences for bond markets and monetary policy are less obvious. It appears that market
actors and policymakers have already addressed some of the shortcomings of inflation metrics.
That raises the question of whether they are getting a better estimate and, if not, how they may
get one. Finding the solutions is likely to continue to be a challenge for economists for many
years to come.
4|Page

References
Moore, Don A., et al. "Positive illusions and forecasting errors in mutual fund investment
decisions." Organizational behavior and human decision processes 79.2 (1999): 95-114.
Sanchez-Fung, Jose R. "Measuring inflation targeting's impact on the macroeconomy." Applied
Economics Letters 15.13 (2008): 1027-1035.
Duffy, David, and Peter D. Lunn. "The misperception of inflation by Irish consumers." The
Economic and Social Review 40.2 (2009): 139.
Georganas, Sotiris, Paul J. Healy, and Nan Li. "Frequency bias in consumers‫ ׳‬perceptions of
inflation: An experimental study." European Economic Review 67 (2014): 144-158.
Clayson, Dennis E. "Performance overconfidence: metacognitive effects or misplaced student
expectations?" Journal of Marketing Education 27.2 (2005): 122-129.
Ranyard, Rob, et al. "Perceptions and expectations of price changes and inflation: A review and
conceptual framework." Journal of Economic Psychology 29.4 (2008): 378-400.