Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INDEX
HONOURS
CORPORATE TAX 17 – 28
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION 29 – 38
SOCIO-ECONOMIC OFFENCES 45 – 52
OPTIONALS
WTO STUDIES 57 - 71
INDIRECT TAX 80 – 87
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
SEMESTER X| B.A.LL.B. (Hons.)
SYLLABUS (SESSION: JAN-JUNE)
Faculty Name Dr. Dipak Das, Dr. Ankit Year/ Semester 5th Year / X
Awasthi, Ms. Prerana Semester
Verma
Course Name Professional Ethics No. of Credits 04
Course Code NA Session Duration 55 Minutes
No of Contact 60 (50 Lectures + 10 Pre-requisite None
Hours Tutorial Classes)
Introduction, The course aims to develop insights into the rules made by the Bar
Course Objective Council of India with respect to the Professional etiquette of
& Pedagogy advocates in India. It gives an outline of the Advocates Act, 1961
with the latest decisions of the Supreme Court and various High
Courts including the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and the
Consumer Protection Act, 2019.
Course Objectives:
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
Upon completion of this course, students would be able to:
LO1- Understand the core values that shape the ethical behaviour of an advocate.
LO2 - Advocate’s rights and responsibilities to act in morally desirable ways, towards
moral commitment and responsible conduct.
LO3 - Integrating academic learning with experimental learning in a profession.
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
Evaluation Components Distribution of
Marks
Continuous Internal Assessment 20
Mid Term examination 20
End Term 60
Total 100
*Note: Pass marks 50% of the final grade.
COURSE PLAN
S.No. Topics Lecture Sessions
1 History of Legal Profession in India 1-9
2 Profession Ethics and duties of Lawyers 10-17
3 The Advocates Act, 1961 18-26
Page |4
DETAILED SYLLABUS
UNIT CONTENT
This module contains the study of legal profession in India in ancient,
Module 1 medieval and especially the changes which the profession underwent
HISTORY OF during British rule and other related aspects essential to understand
LEGAL the history of legal profession in India.
PROFESSION IN It also includes Legal education especially to track changes in pre and
INDIA post globalization in Indian scenario.
This module includes issues like need and necessity of ethics in the
Module 2 legal profession.
PROFESSIONAL In addition, duties of lawyers towards
ETHICS AND ➢ his clients,
DUTIES OF ➢ court including Bar and Bench relationship,
LAWYERS ➢ public,
➢ his fellow attorneys,
➢ self,
➢ society, etc., will also be undertaken for discussion.
The module will also include role played by a lawyer in the
administration of justice and advocate’s duty towards legal reform
and duty to provide legal aid etc.
This module covers the Advocates Act, 1961 and relevant provisions
Module 3 of the Bar Council of India Rules.
ADVOCATES Special Emphasis to be given on:
ACT, 1961 ➢ Salient Features of the Act
➢ Admission and Enrolment of Advocates
➢ Disciplinary Actions
➢ Conduct of Advocates
Page |5
The core contents of this module are right to practice, right to argue
Module 4 his case, right over his professional fees.
RIGHTS AND Decisions of courts on Advocate’s right to strike will be subject of
LIMITATIONS OF deliberation.
SUCH RIGHTS Conflicts of interests, lawyer’s versus client’s interests and
limitations of the rights of lawyers including restrictions on
advertising, bar from carrying on other professions, etc. will also be
taken up for discussion.
This module includes essential skills of a lawyer, case laws and
Module 5 relevant enactments like Consumer Protection Act,2019; the
LIABILITY FOR Contempt of Court Act, 1971 etc. which imposes liability upon an
DEFICIENCY IN advocate for the wrongs he commits in the course of his professional
SERVICE AND service.
OTHER WRONGS
COMMITTED BY
LAWYERS
The following important topics will be taken up for class discussion
Module 6 during the course:
IMPACT OF ➢ Impact of Globalization on legal profession,
GLOBALIZATION ➢ Legal outsourcing in India,
ON LEGAL ➢ Role of advocate in providing legal aid services,
SERVICES IN ➢ Advocate’s role in outside court/informal settlement of
INDIA disputes and,
➢ Age bare and entry into practice.
READINGS:
CASE LAWS:
➢ A.K. Balaji v. The Government of India (2018)
➢ Bar Council of India v. A.K. Balaji (2018)
➢ Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal vs Union of India & Anr (2002)
➢ Balraj Singh Malik vs Supreme Court of India (2012)
➢ N.K.Bajpai vs Union of India & Anr (2012)
➢ State of Punjab And Ors vs Ram Singh Ex. Constable (1992)
➢ Noratanmal Chouraria vs M.R. Murli & Anr (2004)
➢ R.D. Saxena vs Balram Prasad Sharma (2000)
➢ The Communist Party of India (M) vs Bharat Kumar & Ors (1997)
➢ Mahabir Prasan Singh vs M/S Jacks Aviation Private Ltd (1998)
➢ E. M. Sankaran Namboodiripad vs T. Narayanan Nambiar (1970)
➢ In Re: Prashant Bhushan and another (2020)
➢ In Re: Hon’ble Justice Shri C.S. Karnan (2017)
➢ In Re: Vijay Kurle and others (2020)
➢ M.V. Jayarajan v. High Court of Kerala (2015)
➢ Hari Singh Nagra v. Kapil Sibal and others (2010)
➢ Abhyudaya Mishra v. Kunal Kamra (2020)
➢ Aditya Kashyap v. Rachita Taneja (2020)
➢ Surender Raj Jaiswal And Ors. vs Vijaya Jaiswal (2003)
➢ Jaymal Thakore vs Charity Commissioner (2001)
➢ Harishankar Rastogi vs Girdhari Sharma And Anr (1978)
➢ Bar Council Of India vs High Court Of Kerala (2004)
➢ V.P. Kumaravelu vs The Bar Council Of India, New Delhi (1997)
➢ Pandurang Dattatreya Khandekar vs The Bar Council Of Maharashtra, (1983)
➢ Kerala Vyapari Vyavasayi Ekopana vs State Of Kerala (2013)
➢ George Kurian vs State of Kerala (2004)
➢ In Re: Arundhati Roy vs Unknown (2002)
ONLINE ARTICLES/BLOGS/REPORTS:
https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-582-strikes-by-advocates-in-india.html
Learning The students will have necessary legal skill to understand the
Outcomes: importance of fundamental rights and its legal implications and will
acquire analytical ability to give interpretation to the constitutional
issues in contemporary times.
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
Evaluation Components Distribution of
Marks
Continuous Internal Assessment 25
Mid Term examination 25
End Term 50
Total 100
*Note: Pass marks 50% of the final grade.
COURSE PLAN
S.No. Topics Lecture
Sessions
1 INTRODUCTION 1-08
2 RIGHT TO EQUALITY 09-20
3 RIGHT TO FREEDOM 21-32
4 RIGHT TO LIBERTY 33-39
5 RIGHTS TO LIBERTY AND EQUALITY 40-47
6 ENFORCEMENT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 48-54
7 SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS AND THEIR 55-60
ENFORCEMENT
DETAILED SYLLABUS
UNIT CONTENT
Historical Development of Fundamental Right, Concept of
Module 1 Fundamental Right, How fundamental are the Fundamental Rights?
INTRODUCTION Fundamental Rights in India, Justifiability of Fundamental Rights,
P a g e | 12
READINGS:
Prescribed Text:
• The Constitution of India, 1950
Prescribed Books:
• S. Choudhary, M Khosla and PB Mehta, The Oxford Handbook of the Indian
Constitution, 1st ed., 2016,
• M. P. Singh, V. N. Shukla’s Constitution of India, 13th ed., 2019
• M.P. Jain, Indian Constitutional Law, 8th ed., 2018
P a g e | 14
• Udai Raj Rai, Fundamental Rights and their Enforcement 1st ed., 2011
• D.D. Basu, Shorter Constitution of India (15th ed., 2018)
• H.M. Seervai, Constitutional Law of India (4 th ed., Vol 1 (1991), Vol. 2
(1993), Vol. 3 (2019 Rep.)
Recommended Readings:
• Granville Austin, The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation (1966)
• Granville Austin, Working a Democratic Constitution - A History of the Indian
Experience (1999)
• S.P. Sathe, Judicial Activism in India 2nd ed.
• Shiva Rao, The Framing of India’s Constitution– Select Documents (1967)
• Report of the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution
(2002)
• Guidelines for Public Interest Litigation issued by the Supreme Court of India
https://main.sci.gov.in/pdf/chamberAllotement/pilguidelines.pdf
CASE LAWS:
1. Som Prakash v. Union of India (1981) 1 SCC 449
2. Pradeep Kumar Biswas v. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology (2002) 5 SCC 111
3. G. Basi Reddy v. International Crops Research (2003) 4 SCC 225
4. Zee Telefilms Ltd. v. Union of India (2005) 4 SCC 649
5. State of U.P. v. Radhey Shyam Rai (2009) 5 SCC 577
6. Jatya Pal Singh v. Union of India (2013) 6 SCC 452
7. BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar (2015)3 SCC 251
8. Dr. Janet Jeyapaul v. SRM University (2015) 16 SCC 530
9. Keshavan Madhava Menon v. State of Bombay AIR 1951 SC 128
10. Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v. State of M. P. AIR 1955 SC 781
11. State of Gujarat v. Sri Ambica Mills (1974) 4 SCC 656
12. Bashesher Nath v. CIT AIR 1959 SC 149
13. State of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara AIR 1951 SC 318
14. RMDC v. Union of India AIR 1957 SC 628
15. Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017) 9 SCC 1
P a g e | 15
Desirable
4. Corporate Finance
5. Corporate reconstruction
8. WTO Studies
Introduction, The concept of tax planning, tax avoidance and tax evasion has received
Course extensive judicial attention in India. However in recent times this subject
Objective & has gained much importance because of the increasing tendency of the
Pedagogy Revenue to examine with microscope any transaction that leads to
P a g e | 18
Our ancient history and culture give us in India our unique identity.
Ancient lawgivers and philosophers, like Manu and Chanakya, wrote
extensively on the duties of a sovereign and their relationship with the
subjects. They laid foundations of mighty empires and enabled the spread
of India’s unique culture and civilization across many countries. When Mr.
James Wilson introduced Income Tax in India in its modern form, he was
only following in the footsteps of this illustrious tradition. The ancient
dictum, ‘Kosh Mul Danda’ continues to be as relevant today as it was
thousands of years back. At that time, though the existence of
industrialization and trading was at its acute stage, but taxation of the
transactions by these above bodies prevailing.
Recently we have seen the law courts trying to compute tax on the
overseas transactions of the companies, which proves the competency and
power of the tax authorities in India and their vigilance over the
transactions which draw some impact in India. So the reconstructions or
rehabilitation of the companies have separate importance and scope of
study under the tax perspectives. We need to study the classifications of
companies done by the financial perspectives and social object.
COURSE OBJECTIVES
CO3: To understand the procedural compliances for corporate under tax laws, National &
International.
CO4: To interpret and apply the corporate tax provisions nationally and internationally
LO1. Students will be able to know the system for Corporate Taxation.
LO2. Students will be able to know the various components of the legislation and its use in
the process of Corporate Taxation.
LO3. Students will be able to examine the tendencies of judicial decisions while exploring
the meaning of the terms especially at the time of all evolving tax lawS for companies.
LO4. The student will understand and demonstrate the conceptual and working knowledge of
Corporate Taxation.
EVALUATION COMPONENTS:
Components of Course Evaluation
Total 100%
COURSE PLAN
P a g e | 20
MODULE 1: INTRODUCTION 7
TAXATION OF 3. Depreciation
BUSINESSES
4. Taxable Income and Tax Liability.
a. Location of a Business.
TAX IMPLICATION
b. Nature of Business.
c. Form of Business.
4. Equalization Levy
6. Permanent Establishment
7. Base Erosion
TRANSACTIONS investments.
• Dr. Vinod K. Singhania & Dr. Kapil Singhania, Direct Taxes Law and Practice by
Taxmann publications
• Income Tax Law by Chaturvedi & Pithisaria (Wadhwa Publication)
• Corporate Tax Planning by Daniel Q. Posin (Little Brown & Company, London)
• Double Taxation, Tax Treaties, Treaty Shopping by Christiana HJI Panayi (Kluwer
Law International)
• Corporate Tax Planning by V.K.Singhania (Taxmann Publication)
RECOMMENDED READINGS:
CASES
3. Aiken Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 925 (1971) United States Tax
Court; Filed August 5, 1971
4. American Leaf Blending Co. Sdn Bhd v. DG of IR, [1978] STC 561
5. Amritlal v. Union of India, AIR 1964 SC 648
6. Applicant A v. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, (1997) 7 ALJR 381 78
7. Arabian express lines ltd v. Union of India, (1995) 212 ITR 31 (Guj.)
8. Attorney General v. HRH Prince Augustus, [1957] 1 All ER 49
9. Attorney-General for Canada v. Attorney General for Ontario, [1937] AC 326
10. Attorney-General vs. Carlton Bank, [1899] 2 QB 158
11. Authority of Advanced Ruling, New Delhi, P. No. 13 of 1995 [1997] 94 Taxman
171 (AAR - New Delhi)
12. B4U International Holdings Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (IT),
[2012] 52 SOT 545/21 taxmann.com 529 (Mum.)
13. Babaji Kondaji Garad v. Nasik Merchants Co-operative Bank Ltd. AIR 1984 SC 192
14. Baleshwar Bagarti v. Bhagirathi Dass, [1908] I.L.R. Cal. 701
15. Bengal ImmunityCo. v. St. of Bihar AIR, 1955 SC 661
16. Bhim Sen Khosla v Commissioner of Income Tax, (1982) 133 ITR 667 (Del)
17. Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan v. State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors, AIR1982 SC
32
18. Buchanan & Co. v. Babco Ltd., [1978] AC 141
19. Bulmer Ltd. v. S.A. Bollinger, [1972] 2 All ER 1226
20. C.I. T. v. Vishakhapatnam Port Trust, (1983) 144 ITR (AP)
21. Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. The Queen, 76 D Tax 612
22. Case concerning the Polish Postal Service in Danzing, (P.C.I.J.) Series B. No. 11, p.
39
23. Central India Spg. & Wvg. & Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Municipal Committee AIR 1958 SC
341
24. Chertsey, UDC v. Mixnam’s Properties, [1942] 2 All ER 627
25. Chong v. Commissioner of Taxation, (2000) FCA 635
26. CIR v. Hang Seng Bank Ltd. [1991] 1 AC 306 (PC)
27. CIR v. HK-TVB International Ltd. [1992] 3 WLR 439 (CA)
28. CIR v. N.V. Philips, (1955) NZLR 868
29. CIR v. United Dominions Trust Ltd., [1973] 1 NZTC 61
30. CIT v. Chunilal B. Mehta [1938] 6 ITR 521 (PC)
P a g e | 24
31. CIT v. Davy Ashmore India Ltd., [1991] 190 ITR 626 (Cal.)
32. CIT v. J.H. Gotla, [1985] 156 ITR 323 (SC)
33. CIT v. P.V.A.L. Kulandagan Chettiar, [2004] 267 ITR 654 (SC)
34. CIT v. R.M. Muthaiah, [1993] 202 ITR 508 (Kar.)
35. CIT v. Siemens Aktiongesellschaft, [2009] 177 Taxman 81 (Bom.)
36. CIT v. V.R.S.R.M. Firm and Arabian Express Lines Ltd. (1994) 208 ITR 400 (Mad.)
37. Collco Dealings Ltd. v. CIR, [1961] 1 All ER 762
38. Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Lever Bros & Unilever Limited, 1946
39. Commissioner Income Tax v. VikramCottonMills Ltd., [1977] 106 ITR 829 (All.)
40. Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax, Bombay City v. ShriLakshmiSilk Mills Ltd.,
[1951] 20 ITR 451 (SC)
41. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Davy Ashmore India Ltd, (1991) 190 ITR626 (Cal.)
42. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Shahzada Nand&Sons, [1966] 60 ITR 392 (SC)
43. Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation v. Samsung Electronics Pvt.
Ltd., [2011] 203 Taxman 477/16 taxmann.com 141 (Kar.)
44. Commissioner of Taxation v. Lamesa Holdings, (1997) 785 FCA
45. Corocraft Ltd. v. Pan American Airways Inc., [1968] 3 WLR 1273
46. Corstar v. Eurymedon, [1938] 1 All ER 122 (CA)
47. Crown Forest Industries Ltd. v. The Queen, [1995] 2 SCR 802 (Canada)
48. Cudd Pressure Control Inc. v. The Queen, [1999] CTC 1 (Canada)
49. DCIT v. Torquoise Investment and Finance Ltd, (2008) 300 ITR 1(SC)
50. Derry v. Peek, [1889] 14 App. Cas. 337
51. Deshbandhu Gupta & Co. v. Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd., [1979] 4 SCC
565
52. Director Of Income Tax v. M/S Nokia Networks OY, [2012] 25 taxmann.com 225
(Delhi)
53. DIT (International Taxation), Mumbai v. Morgan Stanley and Co. Inc, (2007) 7 SCC
1
54. DJLMB Mauritius Investment Co. v. CIT, (1997) 228 ITR 268
55. Ducking v. Gollan [1965] 42 TC 333 (UK)
56. Dy. Director of IT (International Taxation) v. Daimler Chrysler A.G., (2010) 133
TTJ (Mum) 766
57. Ellerman Lines Ltd. v. CIT, [1971] 82 ITR 913 (SC)
P a g e | 25
77. In Re, Competence of the General Assembly for the Admission of a State to the
United Nations, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1950, p. 4 at p.8
78. IRC v. The Commerzbank AG and IRC v. The Banco Do Brasil SA [1990] STC 285
79. Ishikawajma-Harima Heavy Industries Ltd. v. Director Of Income Tax, Mumbai,
[2007] 288 ITR 408 (SC)
80. James Buchanan & Co. Ltd. v. Babco Forwarding & Shipping (UK) Ltd., [1978] AC
141
P a g e | 26
81. James Mackintosh And Co. (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income, (2005)
92 TTJ Mum 388
82. Janson v. Driefontein Consolidated Mines Ltd., 1902 AC 484
83. John N. Gladen v. Her Majesty the queen, 85 DTC 5188
84. K. P. Varghese v. Income Tax Officer AIR 1981 SC 1922
85. K.R.C.S. Bala Krishna Chetty & Sons & Co. v. State of Madras, [1951] STC 114
86. Karumuthu Thiagaraja Chetty & Co. v. CEPT, [1961] 42 ITR 788 (Mad.)
87. Kolaparti Venkatareddi v. Kolaparti Peda Venkatachalam, AIR 1964 AP 465
88. Kubic Darius v. Union of India, AIR 1990 SC 605
89. Laxminarain Gupta v. A.N. Puri AIR, 1951 Cal. 335
90. Laxmipat Singhania v C.I.T., (1969) 72 ITR 291 (SC)
91. Leonhardt v. CIT, [2001] 249 ITR 418 (Cal.)]
92. Liquidator Rhodesia Metals Ltd. v. CIT [1940] AC 774
93. Maganbhai Ishwarbhai Patel v. Union of India, [1970] 3 SCC 400
94. 94. Maharaja Bikram Kishore v. Province of Assam, [1949] 17 ITR 220 (Cal.) 89
95. Maunsell v. Olins, [1975] All ER
96. Maximov vs. United States, 373 U.S. 49 (1963)
97. McDowell & Co. Ltd. v. CTO, [1985] 154 ITR 148 (SC)
98. Metchem Canada Inc. v. Dy. CIT, [2006] 284 ITR (AT) 196 (Mum.)
99. Minerva Mills Ltd vs. Union of India, AIR 1980 SC 1789
100. Motilal v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1961 ALL 257
101. Motorola Incorporated v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, [2005] 95 ITD 269
102. Mounsell vs. Olins, [1975] 1 All.E.R 100
103. Mount Morgan Gold Mining Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1923] 33 CLR 76
104. Murarilal Mahabir Prasad v. B.R. Vad, AIR 1976 SC 313
105. Naraindas Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1974 SC 1532
106. Narasia Lines (Malta) Ltd v. Dy. CIT, 2005 ITR 268 (Ker.)
107. Nathan v. FCT, (1918) 25 CLR 183
108. Navnit Lal C. Javeri v. K.K. Sen, A.A.C., [1965] 56 ITR 198 (SC)
109. Nirmal v Union Of India, AIR 1959 506 (Cal)
110. No. 630 v. MNR, 59 DTC 300
111. Ostime (Inspector of Taxes) v. Australian Mutual Provident Society, [1960] 39 ITR
210 (HL)
P a g e | 27
112. Pan-American World Airways Inc. v. Department of Trade, [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep.
257
113. R v. Melford Developments Inc., [1982] 2 S.C.R. 504 Canadian Supreme Court
114. Rajkumar Rajindra Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh, AIR 1990 SC 1833
115. Ram Javaya Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1955 SC 549
116. Rattan Lal v Income Tax Officer, (1975) 98 ITR 681 (Del)
117. Ravulu Subba Rao v. CIT AIR 1956 SC 604
118. Reserve Bank of India v. Peerless General Finance &Investment Co. Ltd. AIR 1987
SC 1023
119. Salomon v. Commissioner of Customs & Excise, [1966] 3 WLR 1223
120. Sanjeev Coke Mfg. Co. vs. Bharat Cooking Coal Co. Ltd, AIR (1983) SC 293
121. Saunders v. M.N.R., 54 DTC 524
122. Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. v. Gamlen Chemical Co. (Asia) Pty. Ltd. [1980]
147 CLR 1429
123. Shiva Kant Jha v. Union of India, (2002) 175 CTR (Del) 371
124. Shri Krishna Sharma v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1954 Cal. 591
125. Smidh &Co. v. Greenwood, [1922] 8 TC 193 (HL)
126. Som Prakash Rekhi v. U. O. I. AIR 1981 SC 212
127. South India Corpn. (P.) Ltd. v. Secretary Board of Revenue, AIR 1964 SC 207
128. Sri Krishna Das v Town Area Committee, (1990 ) 183 ITR 401 SC
129. St. of Guj. v. Ramji Bhai, AIR 1979 SC 1098
130. Stag Line Ltd. v. Foscolo, Mango & Co. Ltd., [1932] AC 328
131. State Bank of Travancore v. Mohammed Khan AIR 1981 SC 1744
132. State of Gujarat v. Vora Fiddali, AIR 1964 SC 1043
133. State of West Bengal v. Jugal Kishore, AIR 1969 SC 1171
134. Stickle v. MNR, [1972] FC 672 (Canada)
135. Sun Assurance Co. of Canada v. Pearson, [1984] STC 461 (UK)
136. T.N.K Govindrajulu Chetty & Co v C.I.T., (1964 ) 51 ITR 731 (Mad)
137. The Blonde, [1922] 1 AC 313
138. The Estate of Michael Hausmann v. Her Majesty the Queen, (1998) Canadian Tax
CT- Lexis 1140
139. The Queen v. Melford Developments Inc. [1982] CTC 330
140. Theil v. FCT 89 ATC 4015
141. U. O. I. v. Azadi Bachao Andolan, [2003] 263 ITR 706 (SC)
P a g e | 28
Introduction:
Intellectual Property Law domain at the International and national level was largely
confined to compartments of patents, copyright and trademark. Gradual commercialization
of local products across the territorial boundaries gave a wakeup call for international
community to expand the restricted horizons of IPR. This marked a paradigm shift from
‘industrial property’ to ‘intellectual property’. Initially GI was sleeping beauty. Thanks to
globalization and cross border trade, GI became an important subject matter of IP law. But
the road to the protection of GI was not smooth and untroubled. The international
community tried to provide for uniform laws worldwide for safeguarding GI but, it failed
to provide for a concrete mechanism. It was also unable to provide for viable solutions for
resolving the conflicts that arises between GI and trademark. Nations also realized the
socio-economic value of GI that can be effectively commoditized. Hence the efforts were
made to adopt such approaches that would protect the interest of both consumers and
producers. However, in the wake of economic exploitation of resources, US adopted
producer centric approach of trademark system. On the other hand, Europe preferred a
consumer centric approach of sui generis mechanism for proper channelization and
preserving of its cultural and traditional rich heritage of GIs. Whereas in developing
country like India, was to an extent successful in implementing TRIPS provision but
P a g e | 30
Course Objectives:
1. To understand the basics of Geographical Indications and the rationale for its
protection
4. To introduce to the students the allied and emerging topics in relation to GIs
such as traditional knowledge and farmers rights with the help its related
legislations in India.
COURSE OUTCOMES:
Post the completion of the course, the students will be able to:
1. understand the basics of Geographical Indications and the rationale for their
protection
4. elaborate upon emerging topics in relation to GIs such as traditional knowledge and
P a g e | 31
PEDAGOGY
This subject requires teaching to be a combination of theoretical foundation with practical
application. The contact hours will be utilized in catering a blend of instruction, discussion,
and
brainstorming sessions. The students will be given a hands on training on reading the
applications of GI .
Evaluation Components
COURSE PLAN
COURSE OUTLINE
Unit Content
a. Concept of GI
Module 1: Introduction of b. Rationale for protection of GI
Geographical Indication c. Protection of GI by Trademark System:
(GI) d. Collective Mark and Certification Mark
e. Sui Generis Means of Protecting GI
f. Conflict with a prior mark
g. Generic Name
h. Homonymous Geographical Indication
e. Remedies
Readings:
International Agreements/Conventions
1. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, 1883
2. Madrid Agreement for the Repression of False or Deceptive Indications of Source
on Goods, 1891
3. Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and Their
International Registration in 1958
4. Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS),
1995
15. Micronix India vs Mr. J.R. Kapoor 2003 (26) PTC 593 Del
16. Ministère public v Gerard Deserbais [1988] ECR- 4907 17. Oasis Distilleries
Ltd, Adie Broswon Distillers & Bottlers Pvt Ltd and Malbros International Pvt Ltd
(CS(COMM) 19/2015, IA Nos.25172-173/2015 )
18. Parma ham case, (March 28, 2016) 58
19. Scotch Whisky Association & Anr. v Parvara Sahakar Karkhana Ltd, AIR 1992
Bom 295
20. The Scotch Whisky Association v Golden Bottling Limited, 2006 (32) PTC 656
Del
21. The Tea Board -V- Ohim – Delta Lingerie (Darjeeling Collection De Lingerie) T-
626/13; ECFI 2 OCT 2015
22. Vine Products Ltd. & Ors v. Mackenzie & Co. Ltd & Ors (1969) R.P.C. 1
Scholarly Articles
Online available books (in HNLU digital library /Open Access Platform)
2. Bonanno, A., Sekine, K. and Feuer, H.N., 2020. Geographical Indication and
Global Agri-Food: Development and Democratization (p. 254).
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-
edit/10.4324/9780429470905/geographical-indication-global-agri-food-
alessandro-bonanno-kae-sekine-hart-feuer
Online Articles/Blogs/Reports
1. Kemp, D.J. and Forsythe, L.M., 2006. Trademarks and Geographical Indications: a case
of California champagne. Chap. L. Rev., 10, p.257.
P a g e | 38
https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chlr10&div=13&g_sent=1&cas
a_token=xlZyEiJxgsEAAAAA:biWgrRvfwwUhQp-XI4wLz2KIpk17R0BMsdMty-
srd2OcwwjHwLdYHurW4fObkzCu1x9DU7OHsw&collection=journals
3. Paul, T.K., 2002. Geographical Indications before and beyond TRIPS-An Asian
Perspective. Int'l Bus. Law., 30, p.127.
https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ibl30&div=39&g_sent=1&casa
_token=zy6oPQh1RnIAAAAA:MXsEpfZUsc6FDDi0cbncycUB3kmzWDKpdjfaMmL
0EG2s4rUkktqaca2tIaBEBFXb68JZzwDFiw&collection=journals
4. The Third to Tango: After Pakistan, Nepal Opposes India’s GI Application for Basmati
by Praharsh Gour https://spicyip.com/2021/03/the-third-to-tango-nepal-becomes-the-
second-country-after-pakistan-to-oppose-indias-application-for-gi-over-basmati.html
Pedagogy The course will be taught by class room lectures, notes & articles, case law
method & discussions.
COURSE OBJECTIVES
COURSE PLAN
3 E-Commerce 8
8 Concluding Discussions 6
Unit Contents
Introduction to International Commercial Law
Module 1
➢ Evolution and Development of International Commercial
law
➢ Old Lex Mercatoria to New Lex Mercatoria
➢ Civil & Common Law Thinking
➢ UNIDROIT Principles on International Commercial
Contracts: Preamble and General Principles
➢ The Vienna Convention on International Sale of Goods
(CISG), 1980
➢ Scope, Extent and Salient Provisions of CISG
➢ Formation of Contracts
➢ Performance
➢ Obligation of seller and buyer
➢ Remedies and Exemption
LEARNING OUTCOMES
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
Total 100%
P a g e | 43
TEXT BOOKS
SUGGESTED READINGS
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
After the successful completion of Course Curriculum, a student will be able to:
• LO1 Explain about the conceptual aspects of socio-economic offences and different
forms of socio-economic offences.
• LO2 Distinguish between socio-economic offences and other violations of the law.
• LO3 Critically analyse the various causes of emergence of socio-economic offences
and its all-pervasive dimensions.
• LO4 Know and understand the various aspects of socio-economic offences.
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
Evaluation Components Distribution of
Marks
Continuous Internal Assessment 25
Mid Term examination 25
End Term 50
Total 100
*Note: Pass marks 50% of the final grade.
COURSE PLAN
S.No. Topics Lecture Sessions
1 Introduction to the Socio-Economic Offences 1-6
2 Law Relating to Dowry: The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 7-11
3 The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 12-17
4 The Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 18-24
5 The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 25- 30
6 The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 31-36
7 The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 37-44
8 Socio Economic Offences under some other Legislation: An 45-60
Overview
DETAILED SYLLABUS
UNIT CONTENT
Module 1 Concept and Evolution of ‘Socio-Economic Offences.’
P a g e | 48
Module 8 Socio The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) and the Foreign
Economic Offences Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA)
under some other The Income Tax Act, 1961
Legislation: An The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling
P a g e | 50
READINGS:
CASE LAWS:
• CBI v. Birendra Kumar Singh @ Virendra Kumar Singh @ Pandit, 207(2014) DLT
680.
• CBI v. Jagjit Singh, (2013) 10 SCC 686.
• Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India, AIR 2014 SC 49.
• Chitan J. Vaswani & Anr v. State of West Bengal & Anr., AIR 1975 SC 2473; 1976
SCR (2) 300
• Gaurav Jain v. Union of India & Ors, 1997 (8) SCC 114
• Gian Chand v. State of Haryana, (2013) 14 SCC 420.
• Kalicharan Mahapatra v. State of Orissa, AIR 1998 SC 2595
• Kanwarjit Singh Kakkar v. State Of Punjab, (2011) 6 S.C.R. 895
• Kashmiri Lal v. State of Haryana, (2013) 6 SCC 595.
• Krishnamurthy @ Tailor Krishnan v. Public Prosecutor, Madras, AIR 1967 SC 567;
1967 SCR (1) 586
• Kulwant Singh v. State of Punjab, (2013) 4 SCC 177.
• M. Mohammed v. Union of India, W.A.No.1491 of 2014
• M/S Nestle India Limited v. The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, W. P
(L) No. 1688 of 2015
• M/s. G.M.H. Laboratories, HP & Sri Ram Gopal Goyal v. The Asst. Drug Controller,
Bangalore, MANU/KA/0440/2013.
• Madan Lal Agarwal v. State through Drug Inspector, 2012 Cri L.J. 2584.
• Mahesh Chand v. State of UP, 2013 (10) ADJ 222.
• Mak Data (P) Ltd. v. CIT, (2014) 1 SCC 674.
• Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secy, 2013 (15) SCALE 305.
• Namdev Genba Parthe through M/s/ Kulswami Medical and General Stores v. State of
Maharashtra. 2014 (1) MhLj 266.
• Narayanan K. v. State of Kerala, ILR (2014) 1 Ker 654.
• Navdeep Singh v. State of Haryana, (2013)2 SCC 584.
• Nimmagadda Prasad v. CBI, (2013) 7 SCC 466.
• Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal v. State of Maharashtra, (2013) 4 SCC 642.
• PUCL (PDS Matters) v. Union of India, (2013) 2 SCC 663.
• Rajesh Shantilal Adani v. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate, Mumbai, (2014)
1 GLR 819.
P a g e | 52
BOOKS
• Mahesh Chandra, Socio- Economic Offences (1979)
• J.S.P. Singh, Socio- Economic Offences (1st Ed., 2005, Reprint 2015)
• B.R. Boetra, The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act 1956 (with state rules) (4th Ed.,
1988)
• P.S. Narayan, Commentary on Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 (2nd Ed., 2013)
• BK Sharma and Vijay Nagpal, Treatise on Economic and Social Offences (2017)
• Nuzhat Parveen Khan, Law Relating to Socio Economic Offence (2018)
• Shailesh kumar Singh, White Collar Crimes (2014)
• Seth and Capoor, Prevention of Corruption Act with a treatise on Anti- Corruption
Laws (3rd Ed., 2000)
P a g e | 53
COURSE OBJECTIVES
CO1: To understand the role of different agencies of the criminal justice system in India.
CO2: To understand the reasons why our system would not able to achieve the desired
results in comparison to other systems of the world.
CO3: To ascertain required changes and reformation in the existing criminal justice system.
CO4: To find out the problems and challenges faced by Indian Criminal Justice System,
which is based upon common law principles and how far we may be able to adhere to those
principles in letter and spirit.
P a g e | 54
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
Total 100
Text Books:
Suggested Readings
➢ Book: The Juvenile Justice System in India: From welfare to Rights
Author: Ved Kumari
Publisher: Oxford University Press (2010)
COURSE PLAN
2 Theories of Crimes 10
P a g e | 55
5 Judicial Overlook 5
Unit Content
Evaluation Components:
After the second world war, the global trading system has followed multilateralism. In this
process of the development of the multilateral trading system, the World Trade Organisation
has emerged as a model international organization to provide rules for multilateral trade and
helped to create an environment for global commercial interdependence. This course is
aimed primarily to develop an understanding of the World Trade Organisation and
Agreements attached to the Marrakesh Agreement.
Lecture-based teaching pedagogy will be followed and case laws will also be discussed as
P a g e | 58
per the requirement of the syllabus especially with reference to India. Reference
material will also be
Course Objectives:
Learning Outcomes:
Detailed Syllabus:
Unit Content
Havana Charter for International Trade Organization
(ITO): An overview
→ Consensus-based Model
→ Voting?
• Interpretation of MTAs
• Waiver
• Amendment of provisions of MTAs
• Admission of New Member
Tariff bindings
Reference books:
1. A. L. Koul, Guide to WTO and GATT. Economics, Law and Politics. (Satyam Law
International & Springer, 2018)
2. Matsushita, Mitsuo et al: The World Trade Organization: Law Practice and Policy
(OUP, Third Edition, 2015)
3. Bhala, Raj: Modern GATT Law: A Treatise on the General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade (Thompson, Sweet and Maxwell, Second Edition, 2014)
4. Lorand Bartels and Ferderico Orthino, Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO
legal system (Oxford Scholarship Online, 2012)
5. Amin M Alavi, Legalization of Development in the WTO (Wolters Kluwer, 2009)
6. Schnitzer, Simone: Understanding International Trade Law (Law Matters Publishing,
2006).
7. Understanding the WTO (Written and published by the World Trade Organization
https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/understanding_e.pdf
P a g e | 65
WTO Documents:
https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/historywto_02_e.pdf
3. The Role of Trade in Ending Poverty. World Trade Organization: Geneva, published
by World Bank Group and World Trade Organization, 2015. Available at:
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/22081/The0role0of0tra
de0in0ending0poverty.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
4. India and the WTO, Aaditya Mattoo and Robert M. Stern, Editors A co-publication of
the World Bank and Oxford University Press, 2003. Available at:
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/15082/9780821354100
.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
Online databases:
2) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/29.4/T
RAD1995027
Dispute Settlement is Not Enough', (2008), 42, Journal of World Trade, Issue 1, pp.
4) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/42.1/T
RAD2008007
5) M. P. Ram Mohan, Vishakha Raj, 'Appellate Body Crisis at the World Trade
Organization: View from India', (2021), 55, Journal of World Trade, Issue 5, pp. 829-
6) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/55.5/T
RAD2021035
Trade Organization', (2005), 39, Journal of World Trade, Issue 4, pp. 671-699,
available at:
8) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/39.4/T
RAD2005040
9) Dukgeun Ahn, 'Linkages between International Financial and Trade Institutions; MF,
World Bank and WTO', (2000), 34, Journal of World Trade, Issue 4, pp. 1-36,
available at:
10) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/34.4/27
3702
11) Manisha Sinha, 'An Evaluation of the WTO Committee on Trade and Environment',
(2013), 47, Journal of World Trade, Issue 6, pp. 1285-1322, available at:
12) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/47.6/T
RAD2013043
P a g e | 67
13) Risa Schwartz, Sabrina Shaw, 'Trade and Environment in the WTO <i>State of
Play</i>', (2002), 36, Journal of World Trade, Issue 1, pp. 129-154, available at:
14) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/36.1/39
7876
15) Susan Ariel Aaronson, 'A Match Made in the Corporate and Public Interest: Marrying
Voluntary CSR Initiatives and the WTO', (2007), 41, Journal of World Trade, Issue 3,
16) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/41.3/T
RAD2007024
17) Matthew Kennedy, 'The Integration of Accession Protocols into the WTO
Agreement', (2013), 47, Journal of World Trade, Issue 1, pp. 45-75, available at:
18) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/47.1/T
RAD2013002
Institution?', (2009), 43, Journal of World Trade, Issue 1, pp. 173-188, available at:
20) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/43.1/T
RAD2009006
21) Boyan Konstantinov, 'Human Rights and the WTO: Are They Really Oil and Water?',
(2009), 43, Journal of World Trade, Issue 2, pp. 317-338, available at:
22) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/43.2/T
RAD2009013
23) Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, 'Human Rights and the Law of the World Trade
Organization', (2003), 37, Journal of World Trade, Issue 2, pp. 241-281, available at:
24) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/37.2/T
RAD2003016
(2005), 39, Journal of World Trade, Issue 5, pp. 819-853, available at:
P a g e | 68
26) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/39.5/T
RAD2005048
27) Eva van der Zee, 'Disciplining Private Standards Under the SPS and TBT Agreement:
A Plea for Market-State Procedural Guidelines', (2018), 52, Journal of World Trade,
28) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/52.3/T
RAD2018018
29) Doaa Abdel Motaal, 'Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) and WTO Rules
Why the “Burden of Accommodation” Should Shift to MEAs', (2001), 35, Journal of
30) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/35.6/38
4804
Organization', (1996), 30, Journal of World Trade, Issue 6, pp. 31-74, available at:
32) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/30.6/T
RAD1996044
of the Doha Development Round: High Risk of Failure', (2006), 40, Journal of World
https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/40.3/T
RAD2006027
34) Wolfgang Weiß, 'Adjudicating Security Exceptions in WTO Law: Methodical and
Procedural Preliminaries', (2020), 54, Journal of World Trade, Issue 6, pp. 829-852,
available at:
35) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/54.6/T
RAD2020036
P a g e | 69
36) Louise Johannesson, Petros C. Mavroidis, 'The WTO Dispute Settlement System
1995-2016: <i>A Data Set and Its Descriptive Statistics</i>', (2017), 51, Journal of
37) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/51.3/T
RAD2017015
38) Wenwei Guan, 'How General Should the GATT General Exceptions Be?: A Critique
39) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/48.2/T
RAD2014009
40) Marc L. Busch, Eric Reinhardt, 'Developing Countries and General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement', (2003), 37, Journal
41) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/37.4/T
RAD2003034
Procedures of the WTO Understanding', (1995), 29, Journal of World Trade, Issue 4,
https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/29.4/T
RAD1995024
Multilateral: Which One is Better?', (1997), 31, Journal of World Trade, Issue 3, pp.
44) https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/31.3/T
RAD1997023
P a g e | 70
2. JSTOR
Review of Political Economy, vol. 7, no. 4, Pluto Journals, 2016, pp. 424–50,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep27669.
Liberalisation.” China: New Engine of World Growth, edited by Ross Garnaut and
http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt24h9qh.17.
4) Iida, Keisuke. “Is WTO Dispute Settlement Effective?” Global Governance,vol. 10,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/27800522.
5) Raby, Geoff. “Entry into the WTO: Commitments and Implementation.” China: New
Engine of World Growth, edited by Ross Garnaut and Ligang Song, ANU Press,
6) Bougette, Patrice, and Christophe Charlier. Renewable Energy, Subsidies, and the
WTO: Where Has the ‘Green’ Gone? Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), 2014,
International Issues, vol. 23, no. 3, Kapur Surya Foundation, 2019, pp. 44–57,
8) Capling, Ann, and Richard Higgott. “Introduction: The Future of the Multilateral
Trade System—What Role for the World Trade Organization?” Global Governance,
vol. 15, no. 3, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2009, pp. 313– 25, available at:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/27800760.
https://www.wto.org/english/forums_e/students_e/students_e.htm
https://epgp.inflibnet.ac.in/Home/ViewSubject?catid=ZzUApmBk4i7kYctp+aiP1w==
P a g e | 72
Faculty Name Dr. (Mrs.) Kiran Kori Year/ Semester 4 & 5/VIII & X
Course Name Women and Law No. of Credits 4
Course Code NA Class Duration 60 Minutes
No of Contact 50 Lectures + 10 Tutorials Pre-requisite Basic knowledge
Hours =60 hours of various aspects
of women rights
and issues
Introduction, In order to be considered as a civilized society, the women have to
Course Objective treated with equality, liberty and without arbitrariness. There are
& Pedagogy many countries which duly recognize the women as a promising
counterpart of men. Indian culture also respects women in various
capacities in all communities. Nevertheless, the women are projected
as vulnerable and their problems multiply due to various reasons.
During 19th century major social reforms were done for the
upliftment of women. Even then the gender gap has increased not
only due to women as a vulnerable sex but also due to cultural
differences/drawbacks prevailing in the society. There have been
cases of subordination, suppression, oppression of women in almost
every sphere. The laws have been framed for women empowerment,
the judiciary is very prompt in recognizing the rights and position of
women in society and at workplace. Still the situation is poor and
access to justice becomes a long way. In the light of this, the course
covers and intents to make the students aware of issues and laws
relating to women.
COURSE OBJECTIVE:
P a g e | 73
TEACHING PEDAGOGY:
The course components are administered through class room
teaching, power point presentations, showing short documentaries,
tutorial classes, and continuous evaluations. Every component of the
course module tries to inculcate the laws and legislations available
for care, protection and upliftment of women with prevailing
challenges. Students are not only encouraged to participate in the
process of discussion but also expected to share their opinions,
creative ideas and critical views in the class room which can help all
the stakeholders for further improvements in teaching-learning
process and interpretation. The methods used in teaching will
preferably be based on case law studies in form of a situation and
involve honing practical skills.
LEARNING OUTCOMES: Through the course, the students will be introduced to the
subject relating to women and law. At the end of the course, the students will be able to:
P a g e | 74
LO1- have the intellectual assessment pertaining to the social, economic and
political status of women in the society,
LO2 –learn and sensitize the society and individuals,
LO3 – analyse the various feminist theories and contribution of women in growth of
society and economy.
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
Evaluation Components Distribution of
Marks
Continuous Internal Assessment 25
Mid Term examination 25
End Term 50
Total 100
*Note: Pass marks 50% of the final grade.
COURSE PLAN
S.No. Topics Lecture Sessions
1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND- GENERAL 1-15
INTRODUCTION AND STAUTUS OF WOMEN IN
GLOBAL ARENA
2 STATUS OF WOMEN IN INDIA 16-25
3 PROTECTION AND SAFEGUARD OF WOMEN UNDER 26-35
PERSONAL LAWS
4 PROTECTION AND SAFEGUARD OF WOMEN UNDER 36-45
OTHER LAWS
5 WOMEN AND EMPLOYMENT 46-54
6 WOMEN EMPOWERMENT: ROLE OF ENFORCEMENT 55-60
MACHINERIES
DETAILED SYLLABUS
UNIT CONTENT
P a g e | 75
A. General Introduction
Module 1
i. Discussion of objectives and goals of
HISTORICAL
the course
BACKGROUND
ii. Introduction on gender perspectives
iii. Definition of gender
iv. Man and woman in legal perspective
v. Feminist Theories
B. Status of Women in Global
Arena/International Law
i. UN Charter
ii. UDHR
iii. ILO CONVENTIONS FOR WOMEN
PROTECTION
iv. ICCPR
v. ICESCR
vi. CEDAW
i. Pre- Independence period
Module 2 a) Social and Legal inequality
b) Social Reform Movements in
STATUS OF India
WOMEN IN ii. Post-independence period
INDIA a) Preamble of the constitution,
Equality provisions in Fundamental
Rights and Directive Principles of
State Policy
b) Uniform Civil Code towards
Gender Justice
c) Participation of woman in
democratic government
iii. Incorporation of International Laws in
Indian legal system relating to women
P a g e | 76
READINGS:
INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTS:
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted by the United Nations
General Assembly at its 3rd session on 10 December 1948 at the Palais de Chaillot in Paris,
France.
2. The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (formally the Convention for the
Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) is drafted in 1950 by the then
newly formed Council of Europe
3. The Convention concerning Equal Remuneration for Men and Women Workers for Work
of Equal Value, or Equal Remuneration Convention. C100 ILO Convention Date of
adoption 29 June 1951
4. ILO Conventions No. 103 (1952) concerning Maternity Protection Convention (Revised)
5. Convention on The Political Rights Of Women New York, 1952
6. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) is a multilateral treaty
adopted by the United Nations General Assembly with resolution 2200A (XXI) on 16
December 1966
7. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) is a
multilateral treaty adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 16 December 1966
8. The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women
(CEDAW) is an international treaty adopted in 1979 by the United Nations General
Assembly.
CASE LAWS:
P a g e | 78
To learn the skill of interpretation and apply the same with critical
approach.
LEARNING Through the curriculum, the students will be introduced to the big
OUTCOMES picture of Indirect Taxes and Law relating to it. At the end of the
course, students will be able to:
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
COURSE PLAN
DETAILED SYLLABUS
UNIT CONTENT
1. Tax Structure in India
Module 1 2. Distinction between Tax and Fee. Charge, duty and
INTRODUCTION surcharge
P a g e | 83
3. Objectives of Taxation
4. Role of Taxation in achieving the Objectives of
Directive Principles.
1. Background of GST.
Module 3 2. Basic concept of GST.
Origin of GST
3. Concept of Value Added Tax and its application in GST.
4. Major defects in the old structure of Indirect Taxes
5. Reasons for introducing Goods and Service Tax (GST).
6. GST Council and its Role
7. CESTAT
1. Important Definitions:
Module 4 2. (a) Business
Goods and Services
(b) Capital Goods
Tax Act, 2017
(c) Export and Import of Goods and Services
(d) Goods
(e) Services.
P a g e | 84
c. Power of Search;
d. Power of Seizure;
e. Power to call for documents and examine a
person;
f. Power to summons;
g. Power to arrest.
6. Penalty.
READINGS:
CASE LAWS:
6. Systematic Approach to GST, Dr. Girish Ahuja and Ravi Gupta, Wolter
Kluwer, Gurgoan.
8. Jaya V.S, Indirect Taxes (GST & Other Indirect Taxes); Eastern Book
Company, Lucknow
ONLINE ARTICLES/BLOGS/REPORTS:
1. https://www.finmin.nic.in/
2. http://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/
P a g e | 87
3. https://cbic-gst.gov.in/
4. https://dor.gov.in/
5. http://financialservices.gov.in/
6. http://www.indiataxlaw.com/
7. https://www.icsi.edu/home/
8. https://www.icai.org/
9. https://www.gstindia.com/about/
BLOGS/CHANNELS/PODCASTS:
• Jaya V.S, “Central Excise and Customs,” Annual Survey of Indian Law-2010, 79-99
XLVI; ISSN 0570-2666 (2011)
• Jaya V.S, “Indirect Taxes Law –I, “Annual Survey of Indian Law-2008, 389-421
XLIV; ISSN 0570-2666; (2009)
• https://blog.saginfotech.com/gst-latest-updates
• https://taxguru.in/category/goods-and-service-tax/
P a g e | 88
LO4 - To engage the learners in examining the differences and uniqueness between various
media platforms and their content requirements
LO5 - To introduce the learners to the nuances of the changing media scenario in terms of
production of media content
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
Evaluation Components Distribution of
Marks
Continuous Internal Assessment 25
Mid Term examination 25
End Term 50
Total 100
*Note: Pass marks 50% of the final grade.
COURSE-PLAN
DETAILED SYLLABUS
Module II
• Meaning and development of Freedom of Speech and
Regulations • TRAI
• ECI: Exit Polls and Opinion Polls
• Laws and Ethics related to Advertisement
• Legal Dimensions of Media
• Censorship of Media
• Self Regulation & Other Issues
• Media Trial
Module VI
• Right to Access Internet
Contemporary • Freedom v. National Security
Development in Media and • Contempt v. Criticism
Law
NOTE: Since many legislative amendments and court decisions could be handed down onthe
topics covered hereinabove after this syllabus has been made applicable, students are
expected to study all such latest amendments and court decisions also, on the topics
P a g e | 93
mentioned in the aforesaid syllabus. The topics and cases are not exhaustive.
READINGS:
CASE LAWS:
1. ABP Pvt Ltd. v. Union of India, (2014) 3 SCC 327 01
2. Bennett Coleman & Co. v. Union of India, AIR 1973 SC 106
3. Bharat Kumar v. State AIR 1997 Ker. 291.
4. Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerela , (1986) 3 SCC 615
5. Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India (AIR 1960 SC 554)
6. Indian Express Newspapers v/s Union of India (1985)1SCC 641
7. MSM Sharma v. Krishna Sinha, AIR 1959 SC 395
8. Naveen Jindal v. Zee Media Corporation Ltd, (2014) 2 SCC 1
9. Prabha Dutt v. Union of India, 1982 SCR (1) 1184
10. Prabha Dutt vs Union Of India & Ors (1982 AIR, 6 1982 SCR (1)1184
11. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu, 1994 SCC (6) 632
12. Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras, 1950 AIR 124, 1950 SCR 594
13. Sakal Papers v/s Union of India A.I.R. 1962 SC 305
14. Secy., Ministry of Broadcasting v. Cricket Association of Bengal, (1995) 2 SCC
161
15. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, (2015) 5 SCC 1
16. Swatanter Kumar v. The Indian Express Ltd, 207 (2014) DLT 221 57
17. Tata Press Ltd. V. MTNL (1995) 5 SCC 139; AIR 1995 SC 2438
18. Texas v. Johnson 491 U.S. 397 (1989)
P a g e | 94
https://www.legallyindia.com/blogs/ndtv-india-ban-a-case-of-regulatory-overreach-
and-insidious-censorship
P a g e | 95
Faculty @ Prof.(Dr.) Yogendra Kumar Year/ Semester VIIIth and Xth Semester
Srivastava
No of 05 Pre-requisite None
Contact
Hours
(Week)
Pedagogy insurance. Consequently, in due course of time fire and life insurance, made their
appearance. Within the last hundred years the insurance principle is being extended
wider. Today one finds insurance cover for health, accidents, motor vehicles,
livestock, crop, burglary, and various other disasters. Insurance is a device not to
avert risks, calamities and disasters; but to mitigate their rigors and financial losses.
The function of insurance is to spread such loss arising from risks of life over a large
P a g e | 97
number of persons.
The operational framework of insurance idea is provided by the general principles
of contract. The insurance policy, being a contract, is subject to all the judicial
interpretative techniques. Besides, the insurance idea has a compensatory justice
component. This brings it in the arena of the law of tort as well. It is even suggested
that a fully grown and developed law of insurance may, if not totally displace,
decreases the significance of the law of tort.
Course Objectives:
This course is designed to acquaint the students with the conceptual and operational
parameters of insurance law in the context of the development of the general
principles of law and judicial interpretation to inform the students about the use of
law for the establishment of “just” order in insurance and to develop the
appreciative and evaluative faculties of the students. The objective of the course is
as follows:
• To understand the basic and advance concepts of law of Insurance.
Pedagogy:
The course components are administered through class room teaching, showing
short documentaries, tutorial classes, open access resources,
workshops/debate/discussions. Every component of the course module tries to
inculcate the basic principles of contract of insurance and its application in the case
laws critically. Students are not only encouraged to participate in the process of
P a g e | 98
discussion but also expected to share their opinions, creative ideas and critical views
thereafter in the class room which can help all the stakeholders for further
improvements in teaching-learning process and interpretation of case laws related to
Law of Insurance. The methods used for teaching will be purely based on case law
studies in form of a situation and involve enhancing practical skills.
LO1 Demonstrate and understand about the basic and essential tenets of the Indian Legal
Regime relating to Insurance Laws.
LO2 Equipped about Rights of an Insured and beneficiaries in India and the various
remedies he is entitled to avail under different Insurance Legislation.
LO3 Educate the various flaws in existing Insurance legal frameworks and role of judiciary
and other regulatory institutions.
LO4 Develop an analytical and critical perspective about the existing Insurance law
framework to enable them to suggest changes wherever necessary.
Evaluation Components:
Heads of Evaluation components Distribution of marks
End Term Examination 50 marks
Mid Term Examination 25 marks
Continuous Internal Assessment 25 marks
Total 100 marks
COURSE PLAN
Unit Content
Module 1 • Definition, nature, and history of insurance
Introduction • Contract of insurance- classification of contract of
insurance, nature of various insurance contracts
• History and development of insurance in India
• The Insurance Act, 1938
• Insurance Regulatory Development Authority (IRDA)
of India- role, powers and functions
Module 2 • Principle of Uberrima Fidei-non-disclosure-
General Principles of misrepresentation in insurance contract
Law of Insurance • Insurable interest
• Risk and principle of causa proxima
• Premium
• Assignment of Policies
• Subrogation
• Double insurance
• Contribution
• Reinsurance
• Underinsurance
Module 3 • Nature and scope of life insurance, definition, kinds of
Life Insurance life insurance, the policy and formation of a life
insurance contract
• Event insured against life insurance contract
• Circumstances affecting the risk
• Amounts recoverable under life policy
• Persons entitled to payment
• Settlement of claim and payment of money
Module 4 • Nature and scope
Marine Insurance • The Marine Insurance Act 1963
P a g e | 100
• Voyage –deviation
• Perils of the sea
• Partial loss of ship and of freight, salvage, general
average, particular charges
• Measure of indemnity, total valuation, liability to third
parties
Module 5 • Motor Vehicles Act, 2019
Motor Vehicle • Nature and scope
Insurance • Effect of insolvency or death on claims, insolvency
and death of parties, certificate of insurance
• Claims tribunal, constitution, functions, application for
compensation – who can apply? –Procedure and
powers of claims tribunal – its awards
• Liability insurance
• Public liability insurance
Module 6 • Property Insurance- Fire, Burglary and Theft Policies
Miscellaneous • Livestock Insurance
Insurance Schemes: • Agricultural Insurance
New Dimensions • Health Insurance
• Insurance Ombudsman
Prescribed Legislations:
Essential Readings:
1. Bird, John, Modern Insurance Law (10th ed., 2013), Sweet and Maxwell
Suggested Readings:
1. Malik, Sumeet, J.V.N. Jaiswal's Law of Insurance- Vols 1&2, Eastern Book Company (2nd
ed., 2020)
3. M.N. Srinivasan & K. Kannan (Revised by Justice K. Kannan) Principles of Insurance Law
(10th ed., 2017), LexisNexis
4. M.N. Mishra and S.B. Mishra, Law of Insurance (25th ed., 2016)
5. Birds, John, Modern Insurance Law, Sweet & Maxwell; Eighth edition (1 January 2011)
6. M.B. Shah, Landmark Judgments on Insurance under the Consumer Protection Act,
Universal Law Publishing (2004)
7. E.R. Hardy Ivamy, General Principles of Insurance Laws, (6th ed., 1993), Butterworths,
Delhi
9. Evan James MacGillivray, MacGillivray on Insurance Law: Relating to All Risks Other
Than Marine, Sweet & Maxwell Ltd; 6th Revised edition (1997)
10. K.S.N. Murthy & K.V.S. Sarma, Modern Law of Insurance in India (6th ed., 2019),
LexisNexis, Delhi
Recommended Cases:
3. Kasim Ali Bulbul v. New India Assurance Co. AIR 1968 J & K 39
4. Smt. Krishna Wanti Puri v. Life Insurance Corporation of India,AIR 1975 Del. 19
5. .Smt. Dipashri v. Life Insurance Corporation of India, AIR 1985 Bom 192
7. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. M/s Zuari Industries Ltd.(2009) 9 SCC 70
11. Vijay Kumar v/s New Zealand Insurance Co. AIR 1954 Bom.
13. Lakshmi Insurance Co. v/s Bibi Padmavati AIR 1961 Punjab
14. L.I.C. of India v/s Smt. Vijaya Chopra AIR 2008 (NOC) 2334
15. L.I.C. of India v/s Smt. Chandra Kanta AIR 2008 (NOC) 2334
16. L.I.C. of India v/s Mrs. Shashi Sethi AIR 2008 H.P. 67
17. Smt. Sakhitombi v/s Zonal Manager, L.I.C. of India, Calcutta AIR 2009 Gauhati 90
18. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v/s Shri Hasan Sultan Nadaf [(1992) 3 CPJ 64 (National
Commission)
22. Biman Krishna Bose v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (2001) 6 SCC 477
P a g e | 103
25. Satwant Kaur Sandhu v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (2009) 8 SCC 316
26. Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Rekhaben Nareshbhai Rathod (2019) 6 SCC 175
P a g e | 104
LEARNING OUTCOMES: Through the curriculum, the students will get a clear frame of
Law of Insolvency. At the end of the course, students will be able to:
LO1- Finely trace out the ambit of this law with its purpose
LO2 –can learn the interlink of this law with other laws
LO3 – can make right balance of this law with its purpose
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
Evaluation Components Distribution of
Marks
Continuous Internal Assessment 25
Mid Term examination 25
End Term 50
Total 100
*Note: Pass marks 50% of the final grade.
P a g e | 106
COURSE PLAN
S.No. Topics Lecture Sessions
1 INTRODUCTION 1-12
2 CONCEPTS RELATING TO INSOLVENCY 13-21
3 CORPORATE INSOLVENCY 22-35
4 ISSUES IN CORPORATE INSOLVENCY 36-44
5 EASY EXIT FOR CORPORATES: VOLUNTARY 45-52
LIQUIDATION &FAST TRACK INSOLVENCY
6 CROSS BORDER INSOLVENCY 53-60
DETAILED SYLLABUS
UNIT CONTENT
a) Introduction to Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Module 1 b) Insolvency and Bankruptcy: Social, Legal, Economic and
INTRODUCTION Financial Perspectives
c) Need for Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Exploring the rationale
and objectives
READINGS:
CASE LAWS:
1. Manish Kumar vs Union of India, LL2021SC25
2. Phoneix Arc Pvt Ltd vs Ketubhai Ramubhai Patel LL2021 SC 60
3. Ramesh Kymal vs M/S Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Ltd. LL 2021 SC 71
4. P. Mohanraj & Ors vs M/S Shah Brothers Ispat Ltd. LL 2021 SC 120
5. A Navinchandra Steels Pvt Ltd vs SREI Equipment Finance Ltd. LL 2021 SC 122
6. Jaypee Kensigton Boulevard Apartments Welfare Associatiion vs NBCC 3395 sc
2020
7. Anuj Jain Interim Resolution
8. Professional for Jaypee Infratech Limited Vs Axis Bank Limited Etc. Etc. [Civil
Appeal
Nos. 8512-8527 of 2019
9. Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited Through Authorised Signatory
Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 8766- 67/2019
10. Innoventive Industries Ltd. Vs. ICICI Bank & Anr. [2017] Mobilox Innovations Pvt.
Ltd. Vs. Kirusa Software Pvt. Ltd. [2017] 01 SC
11. Macquarie Bank Ltd. Vs. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd [2017] 14 SC
12. K. Kishan Vs. M/s. Vijay Nirman Company Pvt. Ltd. [2018] 01 SC
13. Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited Vs. Equipment Conductors
and Cables Limited [2018] 33 SC
14. Laxmi Pat Surana Vs. Union Bank Of India & Anr. (2021) 53 SC
P a g e | 108
15. M/s. Orator Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Samtex Desinz Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 68 SC
16. Dena Bank Vs. C. Shivakumar Reddy and Anr. (2021) ibclaw.in 69 SC
17. E S Krishnamurthy & Ors. Vs. M/s Bharath Hi Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 173
SC
18. Arcelormittal India Private Limited Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. [2018]
19. Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors. [2019]
20. B.K. Educational Services Private Limited Vs. Parag Gupta And Associates [2018]
32 SC
21. K. Sashidhar Vs. Indian Overseas Bank & Ors. [2019] 08 SC
ONLINE BLOGS
1. https://cbcl.nliu.ac.in/category/insolvency-law/
2. https://ibclaw.in/blog/
3. https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/blog/tag/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code/
4. https://www.corpiblblog.com/
P a g e | 109
Introduction, INTRODUCTION:
Course Objective
Legislation dominates the contemporary legal landscape. Almost all fields
& Pedagogy
of legal regulation involve legislation in some form. Legislatures enact
laws after much deliberation. No doubt in this process they have to take
into account the present and future needs of the people. With the
emergence of legislation, interpretation of statutes became a method by
which judiciary explores the intention behind the statutes. Judicial
interpretation involves construction of words, phrases and expressions. In
their attempt to make the old and existing statutes contextually relevant,
courts used to develop certain rules, doctrines and principles of
interpretation. Judiciary plays a highly creative role in this respect. The
ability to interpret and understand the operation of legislation is a skill
essential to understanding law and its operation. In this backdrop, the
course is designed to discuss in detail the nuances of interpretation of
statutes.
P a g e | 110
Course Objectives:
CO 1- To understand the system of Interpretation of Statutes which is the
core functions of the Court
CO 2- To discuss the methods of interpretation according to the nature
and type of legislation as beneficial laws, penal laws, taxing laws etc.
CO 3 -To know about the various components of a statute and its use in
the interpretation of statutes.
CO 4 - To explore tendency of the judiciary in deciding cases.
Pedagogy:
Learning Outcome:
LO1- Student will be able to understand the meaning nature, kind’s laws and its
interpretation.
LO2- Student will be able to know the system for interpretation of statutes
LO3- Students will be able to know the various components of the legislation and its
use in the process of interpretation
LO 4- Students will be able to examine the tendencies of judicial decisions while
exploring the meaning of the terms especially at the time of uncertainties in law.
EVALUATION COMPONENTS :
Individual Projects 25
Total 100%
*Note: Pass marks 50% of the final grade.
UNIT CONTENT
MODULE I 1. Introduction:
Introduction Meaning of Interpretation and the construction
Intention in interpretation; why original intent is important?
Appraisal of the principle of plain meaning
Making sense of Precedent; determining ‘ratio decidendi
How judges decide? The Method of Philosophy; the Method of
Sociology
Module VIII
8. Interpretation of Constitutional Documents
Interpretation Of
Constitutional Constitutional Interpretation and Judicial Review
Documents Rules of Interpretation of Constitution and Constitutional Documents
Reading:
Text Books:
Statutes:
1. The General Clauses Act, 1897
Case Laws:
1. Anurag Mittal V Shaily Mishra Mittal, (2018) 9 SCC 691 :AIR 2018 SC 3983
2. Bhatia International V Bulk Trading S.A 2002 4 SCC 105 : AIR 2002 SC 1432
P a g e | 114
3. T.N Electricity Board V Status Speg. Mills Ltd (2008) 7 SCC 353 :AIR 2008 SC
2838
4. Municipal Corporation Hyderabad. v. T.N Murthy (1987) 1 SCC 568
5. C.I.T v. Teja Singh AIR 1959 SC 352
6. ITO, Mangalore v. M. Damodhar Bhat, AIR 1969 SC 408
7. Sussex Peerage Case (844) 11 C1 & F 85
8. Wallace v Jaffree 283U.S.25(1931);
9. Padma Sundara Rao v. State of Tamil Nadu, (2002) 3 SCC 533;
10. Tej Kiran Jain v. N. Sanjiva Reddy, (1970) 2 SCC 272,
11. Jugalkishore v. Raw Cotton Co., AIR 1955 SC 376;
12. G. Narayanaswami v. Pannersevan, (1972) 3 SCC 717,
13. Union of India V Elphinstone Spinning and Weaving Com. Ltd 2001 (1) JT SC 536
14. Sunil Batra V Delhi Administration (1978) 4 SCC 409
15. Balram Kumawat v Union of India (2003) 7 SCC 628
16. National Insurance Company Ltd V Anjana shyam (2007) SCC 445
17. Sachidananda Misra V State of Orissa (2004) 8 SCC 599
18. C. Ronald V U.T Andaman and Nicobar Islands (2011) 12 SCC 428
19. Shankar Raju V Union of India (2011) 2 SCC 132
20. Union of India V Vasudeva Murthy AIR 2010 SC 2879
21. Hardeep Sing v State of Punjab (2014) 3 SCC 92
22. Craw Ford V Spooner (1846) 6 Moore PC 1
23. Kartar Singh V State of Punjab (1994) 3 SCC 569
24. Heydon's Case (1584) 76 ER 637
25. Bengal Immunity Com. Ltd v State of Bihar AIR 1955 SC 661
26. Sanjay Datt V State through C.B.I Bombay JT 1994 (5) SC 540
27. V.L.S Finance Ltd v Union of India (2013) 6 SCC 278
28. State of U.P V Hari Ram (2013) 4 SCC 280
29. Grid Corporation of Orisa V Eastern Metal & Ferro Alloys (2011) 11 SCC 334
30. Competition Commission of India V Steel Authority of India Ltd 2010 (10) SCC 744
31. C.S.T ,M.P V Radhakrishan (1979) 2 SCC 249
P a g e | 115
32. Karnataka Bank Ltd V State of Andhra Pradesh (2008) 2 SCC 254
33. State of Maharashtra V Bharat S. Shah (2008) 13 SCC 5
34. Kedarnath V State of West Bengal AIR 1953 SC 404
35. Re Kerala Education Bill , 1957 AIR 1958 SC 956
36. Maharashtra Land Development Corporation V State of Maharashtra 2010 (11)
SCALE 675
37. Keshvanadn Bharati V State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225; AIR 1973 SC 1461
38. Indian City Properties Ltd V Municipal Commissioner of Greater Bombay (2005) 6
SCC 417
39. N.C.Dhoundial V Union of India (2004) 2 SCC 579
40. Union of India V National Federation of the Blind (2013) 10 SCC 772
41. Iqbal Singh Marwah V Mieenakshi Marwah (2005) 4 SCC 370
42. Balraj Kunwar V Jagtpal Singh ILR 26 All 393 PC
43. Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking V Lakshya Media
Pvt.Ltd (2010) 1 SCC 620
44. Hanlon V Law Secretary 1980 2 All ER 199 (HL)
45. Benagal Nagpur Railway Company v Ruttanji Ramji AIR 1938 PC 37
46. Mudliyar Chatterjee V International Film Com. AIR 1943 PC 34
47. Mohomed Ariffin V Yeah Oai Gark 43 AI 256 Reffered in Jamma Masjid case AIR
1962
48. Shambhu Nath Mehra V State of Ajmer AIR 1956 SC 599
49. Ali M.K V State of Kerla (2003) 11 SCC 632
50. Biman Basu V Kallol Gupta Thakurta AIR 2010 SC 3328
51. Black Clawsom International Ltd v Papierweke Waldjof Aschaffenburg A.G (1975)
1 All ER 810 HL
52. Papper v hart 1993 1 All ER 42 (HL)
53. Navartis Ag V Union of India (2013) 6 SCC 1
54. Union of India V Purushottam (2015) 3 SCC 779
55. T.M.A Pai Foundation V State of Karnataka (2002) 8 SCC 481
56. Shashikant Laxman Kale V Union of India AIR 1990 1 SCC 582
57. Auckland Jute Comp. Ltd V Tulasi Chandra Goswami AIR 1949 FC 153
P a g e | 116
Articles
1. Joseph Raz, Between Authority and Interpretation (Oxford University Press 2009)
2. Robert H. Bork, The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law (New
York: The Free Press 1990)
3. Max Radin, Statutory Interpretation, Harvard Law Review, Vol.43, No.6 (April
1930)
4. Paul Brest, The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding, Boston
University Law Review, Vol. 60 (1980)
5. Ronald Dworkin, Natural Law Revisited, University of Florida Law Review, Vol. 34
(1982)
6. H.L.A. Hart, Positivism and the Separation and Morals, Harvard Law Review, Vol.
71(1958)
7. Lon L. Fuller, Positivism and the Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart,
Harvard Law Review, Vol.71 (1958)
8. Frederick Schauer, Formalism, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 97 (1989)
9. Richard Posner, Legal Formalism, Legal Realism and the Interpretation of Statutes
and the Constitution, Case Western Reserve University Law Review, Vol. 37 (1987)
10. Cass R. Sunstein, On Analogical Reasoning, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 106 (1992)
11. Veena C, Interpretation of Statutes C. Jamnadas & Co. Educational & Law
publisher 4th Ed. 2018
Law Commission Reports:
1. 60th Law Commission Report of Government of India
https://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/51-100/Report60.pdf
P a g e | 118