Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The ORCA Program System
The ORCA Program System
Exchange Slater, B88, G96, LB94, PBE, RPBE, PW91, mPW, TPSS, revTPSS, OPTX, B97,
Correlation VWN3, VWN5, PWLDA, P86, PW91, PBE, OP, TPSS, revTPSS, B97
For functionals with no HF exchange, the tion improves results (CIS(D) method). The RIJCOSX
resolution-of-the-identity (RI) approximation is ex- approximation leads to dramatic speedups at no loss
ploited and greatly speeds up the calculation of the of accuracy. For HDFT, the Tamm–Dancoff approx-
Coulomb term (RI-J). Exchange-correlation terms imation (TDA) is presently obligatory. In conjunction
are handled by numerical integration using standard with the (D) correction, excited states can be calcu-
techniques. lated for DHDFs.3
The nonlocal HF exchange term can be approx- Intensities for electronic transitions are com-
imated in an efficient way (asymptotically linear scal- puted within the dipole length and dipole velocity
ing Chain Of Spheres (COSX) algorithm; similar to formalisms. Quadrupole and magnetic dipole intensi-
pseudospectral techniques) and combined with RI-J ties are optionally available. The latter become impor-
to give the popular RIJCOSX approximation.1 tant for the computation of X-ray absorption spectra
for which orca cis is widely used.4–6
RELATIVISTIC OPTIONS Analytic gradients are available for CIS and
TD-DFT/TDA and form the basis for the efficient
Scalar-relativistic all-electron calculations are avail- calculation of resonance Raman spectra, and absorp-
able. The latter can be done using the zeroth-order tion and fluorescence bandshapes, all of which are
regular approximation (ZORA) [or the infinite-order available (orca asa module).7
regular approximation (IORA)]. Alternatively, the
second-order Douglas–Kroll–Hess (DKH) Hamilto- MANY-BODY PERTURBATION
nian is available in the standard implementation.
THEORY AND DHDFT
Two-component methods are not supported. Analytic
derivatives are available for all of these methods; ge- ORCA features an efficient implementation of
ometry optimizations using scalar-relativistic Hamil- second-order Möller–Plesset perturbation theory
tonians use the one-center approximation. (MP2) and its spin-component-scaled variant (SCS-
A set of segmented-all-electron relativistically MP2) for energies and analytic gradients on the basis
contracted (SARC) basis sets were developed for of RHF, UHF, or ROHF wavefunctions. Whereas the
third-row transition metals, lanthanides and actinides canonical MP2 implementation is fairly efficient, most
in ZORA and DKH2 versions. For the remaining el- calculations are done within the RI-MP2 approxima-
ements, the all-electron basis sets of Weigend et al. tion. Analytic gradients for DHDFs in RI and non-RI
were recontracted. All-electron and small-core ECP variants are implemented.8
calculations are usually of comparable efficiency. Despite the unfavorable O(N5 ) scaling, the RI-
Note a comprehensive study of the performance of MP2 step is usually much faster than the preced-
scalar relativistic and ECP-based DFT for transition ing SCF calculation, even for systems with more
metal geometries.2 than 2000 basis functions. The combination of RI-
MP2 with the RIJCOSX approximation is partic-
EXCITED STATE CALCULATIONS ularly powerful. This is also available for analytic
gradients.9 The orbital-optimized MP2 is available
Excited states can be calculated with all multirefer- and improves results for open-shell molecues.10 It
ence methods described below. For large molecules, has been argued to be similar to the popular CC2
it is more convenient to resort to easier albeit much method.10
less general methods. Such methods are implemented
in the orca cis program. COUPLED PAIR AND COUPLED
Configuration interaction (CI) with single exci- CLUSTER METHODS
tations (CIS) relative to an RHF or UHF reference
determinant and the associated time-dependent DFT Canonical Methods
(TD-DFT) methods are available. CIS is known to ORCA features an efficient and parallel module to cal-
have major deficiencies and rarely (if ever) provides culate closed-shell and spin-unrestricted coupled clus-
balanced predictions for electronic spectra. In cases, ter energies including single and double excitations
where it is reasonable starting point, a double correc- (CCSD), as well as perturbative triple excitations
74
c 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Volume 2, January/February 2012
WIREs Computational Molecular Science The ORCA program system
M = S, S − 1, . . . , −S are generated for each root estimates are supported. Calculated Hessians (e.g.,
with total spin S, and the matrix elements over the from a lower level of theory) can be fed into the
relativistic many particle Hamiltonian is calculated program. The popular Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–
using Wigner–Eckart algebra.18 Any number of mul- Shanno (BFGS) Hessian update is generally used.
tiplicities and spatial symmetries can be included in Transition states are located using eigenvector
these calculations. In the case of NEVPT2, the matrix following. The initial Hessian does not need to have a
elements are computed over state-averaged CASSCF single negative frequency. The program will use user-
wavefunctions, whereas the diagonal energies of the supplied information in order to follow the mode of
QDPT matrix carry the dynamic correlation correc- interest. A partial Hessian involving only those atoms
tion brought in by NEVPT2. A number of spectro- that are implicated most strongly in the transition
scopic parameters, including absorption and circular state vector can be calculated to initiate the search.
dichroism (CD) spectra, Magnetic Circular Dichro- This can save large amounts of computer time. The
ism (MCD) spectra, g-values, and zero-field splittings Bofill update is used by default.
(ZFSs), can be calculated in this way. A special application is a method for the loca-
tion of minimum-energy crossing points between two
potential surfaces. It is implemented in ORCA for all
COMBINED QUANTUM methods that deliver analytic gradients.
MECHANICAL/MOLECULAR
MECHANICAL AND RELATED
METHODS FREQUENCIES
ORCA can be easily interfaced with existing Com- ORCA only supports the calculations of numerical
bined Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical harmonic frequencies from the differentiation of ana-
(QM/MM) package and supports the incorporation lytic gradients. Single- or double-sided numerical fre-
of large sets of external point charges into the quan- quencies can be calculated. This part of the program is
tum Hamiltonian as well as the calculation of all nec- parallelized for many cores using a master/slave strat-
essary analytic gradients. ORCA is successfully used egy. A similar parallel implementation is available for
together with ChemShell. An interface is supported numerical gradients of methods for which no analytic
by Gromacs and pDynamo. gradients have been coded (e.g., CCSD(T)).
76
c 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Volume 2, January/February 2012
WIREs Computational Molecular Science The ORCA program system
REFERENCES
1. Neese F, Wennmohs F, Hansen A, Becker U. Efficient, 6. DeBeer S, Neese F. Calibration of scalar relativistic
approximate and parallel Hartree–Fock and hybrid density functional theory for the prediction of sulfur K-
DFT calculations. A ‘chain-of-spheres’ algorithm for edge absorption spectra. Inorg Chem 2010, 49:1849–
the Hartree–Fock exchange. Chem Phys 2009, 356:98– 1853.
109. 7. Petrenko T, Neese F. A general efficient quantum chem-
2. Bühl M, Reimann C, Pantazis DA, Bredow T, Neese ical method for predicting absorption bandshapes, res-
F. Geometries of third-row transition-metal complexes onance Raman spectra and excitation profiles for larger
from density-functional theory. J Chem Theo Comp molecules. J Chem Phys 2007, 127:164319.
2008, 4:1449–1459. 8. Neese F, Schwabe T, Grimme S. Analytic derivatives
3. Grimme S, Neese F. Double hybrid density functional for perturbatively corrected ‘double hybrid’ density
theory for excited states of molecules. J Chem Phys functionals. J Chem Phys 2007, 126:124115.
2007, 127:154116. 9. Kossmann S, Neese F. Efficient structure optimiza-
4. DeBeer George S, Petrenko T, Neese F. A simple time- tion with second-order many-body perturbation the-
dependent density functional theory based protocol for ory. The RJCOSX MP2 method. J Chem Theo Comp
the prediction of X-ray absorption spectra. I. Ligand 2010, 6:2325–2338.
K-edges. Inorg Chim Acta 2007, 361:965–972. 10. Neese F, Schwabe T, Kossmann S, Schirmer B, Grimme
5. DeBeer George S, Petrenko T, Neese F. Prediction of S. Assessment of orbital optimized, spin-component
iron-K-edge absorption spectra using time-dependent scaled second order many body perturbation theory
density functional theory. J Phys Chem A 2008, for thermochemistry and kinetics. J Chem Theo Comp
112:12936–11294. 2009, 5:3060–3073.
11. Neese F, Wennmohs F, Hansen A, Grimme S. Accurate 19. Sinnecker S, Rajendran A, Klamt A, Diedenhofen M,
theoretical chemistry with coupled electron pair mod- Neese F. Calculation of solvent shifts on electronic
els. Acc Chem Res. In press. doi:10.1021/ar800241t. g-tensors with the conductor-like screening model
12. Wennmohs F, Neese F. A comparative study of single (COSMO) and its self-consistent generalization to
reference correlation methods of the coupled-pair type. real solvents (COSMO-RS). J Phys Chem A 2006,
Chem Phys 2008, 343:217–230. 110:2235–2245.
13. Neese F, Wennmohs F, Hansen A. Efficient and ac- 20. Neese F. Efficient and accurate approximations to the
curate local approximations to coupled electron pair molecular spin-orbit coupling operator and their use
approaches. An attempt to revive the pair-natural or- in molecular g-tensor calculations. J Chem Phys 2005,
bital method. J Chem Phys 2009, 130:114108. 122:034107/034101–034113.
14. Neese F, Liakos D, Hansen A. Efficient and accurate 21. Römelt M, Ye S, Neese F. Calibration of Mössbauer
local approximations to the coupled cluster singles and isomer shift calculations for modern density functional
doubles method using a truncated pair natural orbital theory: meta-GGA and double hybrid functionals.
basis. J Chem Phys 2009, 131:064103. Inorg Chem 2009, 48:784–785.
15. Anoop A, Thiel W, Neese F. A local pair natural orbital 22. Neese F. Prediction and interpretation of isomer
coupled cluster study of Rh catalyzed asymmetric olefin shifts in 57 Fe Mössbauer spectra by density func-
hydrogenation. J Chem Theo Comp 2010, 10:3137– tional theory. Inorg Chim Acta 2002, 337C:181–
3144. 192.
16. Liakos DG, Neese F. Weak molecular interactions 23. Petrenko T, Sturhahn W, Neese F. First principles
studied with parallel implementations of the local pair calculation of nuclear resonance vibrational spectra.
natural orbital coupled pair and coupled cluster meth- Hyperfine Int 2007, 175:165–174.
ods. J Chem Theo Comp 2010, 6:3137–3144. 24. Ganyushin D, Neese F. First principles calculation
17. Neese F. A spectroscopy oriented configuration inter- of magnetic circular dichroism spectra. J Chem Phys
action procedure. J Chem Phys 2003, 119:9428–9443. 2008, 128:114117.
18. Neese F, Petrenko T, Ganyushin D, Olbrich G. Ad- 25. Lee N, Petrenko T, Bergmann U, Neese F, DeBeer
vanced aspects of ab initio theoretical spectroscopy S. Probing valence orbital composition with iron Kβ
of open-shell transition metal ions. Coord Chem Rev X-ray emission spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 2010,
2007, 251:288–327. 132:9715–9727.
FURTHER READING/RESOURCES
More information on ORCA including an extensive manual can be obtained free of charge under http://www.thch.
uni-bonn.de/tc/orca/
78
c 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Volume 2, January/February 2012