The key determining factors for whether a company should pursue a market development or product development strategy with $1 million would include:
- For market development: availability of new distribution channels, the company's success in its current markets, and whether new untapped markets exist.
- For product development: whether the company has successful mature products, operates in a rapidly innovating industry, faces better competitor products, or has strong R&D capabilities.
The key determining factors for whether a company should pursue a market development or product development strategy with $1 million would include:
- For market development: availability of new distribution channels, the company's success in its current markets, and whether new untapped markets exist.
- For product development: whether the company has successful mature products, operates in a rapidly innovating industry, faces better competitor products, or has strong R&D capabilities.
The key determining factors for whether a company should pursue a market development or product development strategy with $1 million would include:
- For market development: availability of new distribution channels, the company's success in its current markets, and whether new untapped markets exist.
- For product development: whether the company has successful mature products, operates in a rapidly innovating industry, faces better competitor products, or has strong R&D capabilities.
1. If the company has 1 million to spend on a new strategy and is considering
market development versus product development, what determining factors would be most important to consider? Market development is the process of expanding the reach of existing products or services into new geographic areas. The factors below show when market development is a particularly effective strategy: New channels of distribution are available that are reliable, inexpensive, and of good quality. An organization is successful at what it does. New untapped or unsaturated markets exist. An organization has the needed capital and human resources to manage expanded operations. An organization has excess production capacity. An organization’s basic industry is rapidly becoming global in scope.
Product development aims to improve sales by upgrading or developing existing
products or services. The following factors, on the other hand, indicate when product development may be a particularly effective strategy to pursue: An organization has successful products that are in the maturity stage of the product life cycle; the idea here is to attract satisfied customers to try new (improved) products as a result of their positive experience with the organization’s present products or services. An organization competes in an industry that is characterized by rapid technological developments. Major competitors offer better-quality products at comparable prices. An organization competes in a high-growth industry. An organization has especially strong research and development capabilities.
2. There is growing trend of increased collaboration among competitors. List the
benefits and drawbacks of this practice. Nowadays, more strategies that emphasize competitor collaboration are being adopted. So, both organizations must provide something unique, such as technology, distribution, basic research, or manufacturing capability, for a collaboration between competitors to survive and prosper. Benefits collaboration among competitors: Ideally, coopetition is intended to improve the performance of all the rival firms involved. Collaborating with competitors, companies have access to new resources, capabilities, and opportunities that would not be available to them if they competed using their own assets. Coopetition can help firms to improve their sales, access new equipment, save costs through joint promotion, and share knowledge between competing firms. Larger businesses can utilize these improvements in their performance and concentrate their efforts on other opportunities, such as expanding to attract new customers. Drawbacks of collaboration among competitors: Regardless of any collaboration that occurs between such organizations, they are still rivals, competing for similar customers. Firms have to be very careful to engage in an “optimal-level” of coopetition – something that could be difficult to achieve in practice. They could create tensions, such as conflict and power imbalances with their competitors because they cannot differentiate between the opposing forces of cooperativeness and competitiveness. When working under cooperative agreements, companies frequently give up too much information to competitors.
3. Why is it not advisable to pursue too many strategies at once?
It is not advisable because when multiple strategies are pursued at the same time, organizational resources are dispersed too thin. Every organization has a finite amount of resources. No company can pursue all of the strategies that could be beneficial. And It is important not to utilize all strategies at the same time because those strategies require deep focus and analysis. In the same way, no one can take on an endless amount of debt in order to buy goods and services. Only a few strategies can be effectively funded, advertised, and managed at the same time. In addition to being costly, following multiple strategies at the same time makes it difficult for businesses to project consistency, thoroughness, and attention to customers.