You are on page 1of 1

Book Reviews

231

Diagnosing Folklore: Perspectives on Dis- for a more expansive examination of the roles
ability, Health, and Trauma. Ed. Trevor J. of stigma, disability, and power relationships in
Blank and Andrea Kitta. (Jackson: University folkloristic studies of health and medicine, since
Press of Mississippi, 2015. Pp. x + 232, acknowl- the “need for scholarship in these areas is not
edgments, contributors, index.) only theoretical, but also practical” (p. 14). This
last point especially echoes throughout the vol-
Jon D. Lee ume’s essays, each of which attempts to provide
Suffolk University a series of points that could be applied by both
folklorists and health practitioners to further
The folkloristic study of disability, health, and the dialogue between examiner and examinee.
trauma, while still small, has blossomed in the Among these essays, several stand out. Amy
past few decades as folklorists have taken the Shuman’s “Disability, Narrative Normativity,
discipline’s cultural theories and applied them and the Stigmatized Vernacular of Communi-
to the changing landscape of health manage- cative (in)Competence” renews the call for
ment. Diagnosing Folklore moves these theories communicative competence between folklorist
still further by providing a series of case studies, and interviewee by highlighting the importance
each of which offers new perspectives and mod- of multiple recognized valences of “normalcy.”
els that add nuance and critical evaluation to By examining interviews of individuals with
existing paradigms, expanding our base of intellectual disabilities, Shuman demonstrates
knowledge and providing directions for future how “communicative competence depends
research. upon the co-­production of meaning” (p. 30)
The volume’s 10 essays are organized into created by interviewer and interviewee, as well
three sections. Part 1 examines “Disability, Eth- as by careworker and interviewee. In doing so,
nography, and the Stigmatized Vernacular”; Shuman “asks whether the category of normal
part 2 continues with “Folk Knowledge, Belief, conversation might be expanded to include”
and Treatment in Regional and Ethnic Health such co-­production (p. 33), thus providing a
Praxis”; and part 3 concludes with “The Perfor- critique of ableism and evincing how standard
mance of Mental Illness, Stigma, and Trauma.” definitions of “normalcy” fall short by stigma-
The majority of the authors featured will be fa- tizing difference. It is only by recognizing that
miliar to folklorists who study health issues, co-­produced meaning is also valid that folklor-
demonstrating the editors’ care in selecting ists can move away from these faults.
their sources. Evident, too, are the breadth and Sheila Bock and Kate Parker Horigan’s “In-
depth of referenced topics and folk groups, in- voking the Relative: A New Perspective on Fam-
cluding studies of Special Olympics athletes, ily Lore in Stigmatized Communities,” and
diabetic patients, autistic Javanese, women Michael Owen Jones’ “Latina/o Local Knowl-
healers, deranged psychopaths, people with bi- edge about Diabetes: Emotional Triggers, Plant
polar disorder, medical fetishists, and veterans. Treatments, and Food Symbolism,” bridge the
The volume’s introduction ties these dispa- gap between the stigmatized vernacular and
rate groups together. The editors state that they ethnic health praxis through their shared ex-
aim to expand the study of health and stigma amination of lay responses to diabetes and how
by “further [stimulating] dialogue on theory families create critical loci of response and
and fieldwork methodologies in conceptualiz- meaning. Horigan’s interviews with survivors
ing folkloristic approaches to the study of dis- of Hurricane Katrina, for example, confront the
ability, health, and trauma,” since “over the last stigma that survivors of tragedies face, espe-
five years, there [has been] a comparative ab- cially when forced to choose between personal
sence of corresponding, published folkloristic and familial salvation. Both race and poverty
scholarship” (p. 3) in these areas. They empha- complicate these issues, creating fatalistic re-
size the need for scholars to “act as more than sponses among those suffering, whose frequent
ventriloquists, making sure that the primary efforts to supplement help offered through of-
purpose of their scholarship aligns with the in- ficial channels with that provided by folk
tent of their participants” (p. 4), and they call knowledge are often met with official scorn. As

JAF 130_2 text.indd 231 3/29/17 11:00 AM

You might also like