Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Questions 1-6 were worth 1 point each. Questions 7 and 8 are worth 6 points each.
Many of these questions covered the part of the material that was only in the class
reading, not in the notes. Option that is underlined below was
7. Read the story of the Grameen Phone on the attached sheet. It is a copy from
the Grameen Foundation webpages. Analyze both the potential for success of this
project in furthering development and the potential risks involved. (Hint: Think
of everything you have learned in this class and use that to evaluate this project
as realistically as possible. In addition, feel free to use whatever other knowledge
you have. That can give you bonus points).
There is no one right answer to this question. It was interesting to read the various
answers and analysis that people wrote here. What I did not reward at all was
repeating the sentences or ideas from the Grameen sheet of paper. What I was
expecting was discussion of the possibilities of this type of project to further
development in general based on the material covered in class. You could think of the
feasibility of this kind of business idea in a developing country environment. Can it
further development through empowering women (eg. fertility, children’s education,
employment, increasing the voice and mobility of them), creating cultural change?
What are the market failures that this project may tackle, like lack of functioning
credit markets, lack of collaterals because of poverty, moral hazard, asymmetric
information, monitoring. General features of microcredit, like group lending, and how
it may help in solving some of the critical problems why poor do not get credit to start
even a small business. What are the potential externalities/linkages in the society? In
class we discussed the various ways in which poverty affects people and their
surroundings, and what kind of effects the increased income typically creates. What
does the research say about these issues, based on what we learned? Is there evidence
that there is impact? What is the evidence? What do we know, and what don’t we
know.
You could also discuss, like many did, the importance of communication
infrastructure, risks of administration costs of small loans or technical problems
becoming too big. Or possibility that the cultural restrictions on women are too big to
make this succeed, perhaps leading to violent opposition.
In the morning of the exam Helsingin Sanomat (local newspaper) wrote about this
project. Some had read the morning paper, and new the project was success enough
for the owners to fight for the proceeds.
Y = K α ( AL)1−α
•
K = sY − dK
~ K Y
Hint: In class, we denoted the transformed variables by k ≡ and ~y ≡ .
AL AL
This question was bit more challenging. Most people mixed up the increase in L and
n. A permanent increase in labor force shows as a permanent increase in L, not as a
permanent increase in n, the population growth rate. In terms of Solow diagram this
means that neither of the curves shift themselves but rather the increase in L just
lowers the value of k initially in the short run reducing output per capita. In the long
run k returns to the original long run equilibrium as the capital stock, K, increases
over time correspondingly to the increased L. You could have shown this in the Solow
diagram. I was expecting that you would have realized the increase in the level of L
alone would not affect the long-run K/L – ratio.