Reporting Format for Water Supply II. Construetion Stage (Oct 2020) 1. Common Attributes: A- General Details a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Ajmer ©) Name of Project: “Execution of the work of Re organization and Rehabilitation of Urban Water Supply Scheme, Ajmer under and SMART CITY Missions with 7 years Operation & maintenance Including 01 year defect liability period i.e. design (selected part), Build Operate and maintenance and SITC of new pumping machinery in ESCO Model.” 4) Project Code: RAJ-AJM-004 €) Approved Project Cost in SAAP: 30 Cr Project included in which SAAP i.e, VIV/IL: SAAP - IIL 2) Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details i.e, SAAP-I, Il or IIL: No h) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 140 i) Name of Reviewing Agency(IRMA): Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd, JV with JPS Associates i) Date of Review: 8.10.2020 k)_ Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit: Mr. Rajendra Arya 1) Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal ete: PHED, Ajmer m) Key Concerned Officer (s) interacted during Review:-XEn, Mrs, Rajeev Sehgotra,, Mr. NR. Chaoudhary- PM Contractor, n) Number of visits already made for the project: 6" Visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact : on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA. a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC; 9" SLTC dated 30.03.2017 b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 28.10.2016 €) Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RfP). If there is any delay please give reasons: 17/17-18 Dated 27.12.2017Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as per the requirement 4) Publication Details of NIT: 27.10.2017 €) Date of issue of Work Order: 09.05.2018 Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 18.05.2018 8) Actual date of start of work: 19.05.2018 h) Name of Contractor: M/s Vishnu Prakash R Punglia Ltd. i) Contractual Amount, Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Capital Cost: 91.70 Cr; O&M: 11.69 Cr, Work orders Cost: 103.39 Cr (Only Rs.30 Cr. included in AMRUT Mission). Out of total allotment works, department has made a bifurcation of works based of funding. Funded under AMRUT are 1. Distribution pipeline -19729 RM, House water meter- 14516 (AMR-1345, Standard Multi- jet-13171), Electro Chlorinator -1, Electro Magnetic Flowmeter-142, Bulk Flow Meters -19, Replacement ‘of Pumps with -31, Civil work of Pump House at Nagfani-01, Consumer care center Vaishali-01, Master control centre Lohiakhan -01, CWR 900 KL at Vaishali, CWR 1200 KL at Nagfani-01 2. Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: Mile Stone Targeted For The Period As Per plan Reasons Rescheduled | Advise on Project forthe {Hate based on | remedial Component | | delay performance | measures % Total | Target | Achieved] Milestone Quantity | Quantity! Quantity|Completed . PHED has to | fake road PHED may be Distribution utting NOC | Rescheduled | advised to ine-RM, | 6563 6563 5080 71% from Nagar | date provide ———— _ igam, 6 801.2021 | Location for Jnonth Vide Letter | fixing AMR Hydro test of jelayed. No.F(QVAR | meters to the Dis. Pipe __| _6563__| 6563 | 5080 | 77% - AMRUT | __contractor House water 72020- meter Standard 21/6779- Multijet - 6785 Dated (Nos) 13169 | 13169 | 13000 | 99% | 6.10.2020 726" Location for House water | (curtailed 7128 AMR meters meter- (Auto from Supplie is sought Meter Read.) | 2319) _| 726 | donl 55% from Chlorinator - (Nos) At Bus & Stand 1 4 1 100%78% (50% for all supplied Electro and 28% Magnetic Flow for 77 _ {installation is Required to meter -(Nos) 136 136 51 fixed) _ jn progress. speed up the TP r work progress, finalization of jocation. faterial ceived Bulk Flow 92% (All jnstallation in Meters -(Nos) 19 19 16 _| supplied) progress. PHED may be For 8 pumps advised to be fitted at resolve the ilway ‘matter sothat Replacement zolony the pump can fitted of Pumps with ite/lan at railway -{Nos) 31 31 2B 74% _ hot available. colony. [Civil of Pump House & PH Bulding at ‘Nagfani -(Nos) | 1 1 100% _ ‘Consumer care ccenter& JEN Office Vaishali -(Nos) 1 1 1 room | Master control centre Lohakhan ~ (Nos) 1 1 1 100% CWR 9OKL at Defects may be Vaishali - | got listed and (Nos) 1 1 1 100% the same may CWR 1200 KL. ] be got rectified from 1 1 1 100% contractor. Initial qty 2166+21+34+22+76=23 19). And out of 726 Meters contractor have supplied 712 (=685+0+25 +2+0) Received and to be fixed. Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of water supply system etc. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector: above Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. IRMA consultant also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate. Progress is not being uploaded regularly on mAmrut app. IRMA advised for regy ith, in coordination with ULB engineers.3, 4. Quality Assurance a. Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports. Flow meters, water meters, reinforcement steel, DI Pipe (100-450 mm), are tested at manufacturer's premises in presence of ULB officers, or by 3" party (SGS, Approved by SE) and test certificate is issued and PHED maintains the record. Contractor has established a lab at Saderia Complex. Compressive strength testing machine, Slump Cone, verniar calipers, Owen, thermometer and are available at the Lab, PHED officers remain present at the time of any test. Cube strength test is recorded in the register at site, The relevant tests are done on a routine basis as per the provisions of the relevant Indian Standards, Sieve Set, bitumen extractor, are not available at site laboratory, these tests are done by external agency. b. Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records Quality of construction materials used is satisfactory . Ifany deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify during site visit, no any deviation found against specifications as given in DPR. d, When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurance2 check results, ‘No major issues related to quality, ¢. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions Reviewed quality and not found any case of non-conformance at site. Commercial Performance: ‘a, Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, ie. performance with respect to clauses such as ~ guarantee / warranty, defects-tiability, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that contractor has followed and maintained all above mentioned — licenses, Bank guarantee, insurance etc. and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with deduction of tax (as per Govt. rules) Contractor has submitted Bank Guarantee with PHED. |, BG No, -1872IGPEROL0718 Valid up to 23 Apr 2020 and further extended up to 22.10.2020 amount 2.0 Cr issued by bank BOB Jodhpur BG No. -1872IGPER003119 Valid upto 24 March 2020 and further extended up to 22.03.2021 amount 1.5 Cr issued by bank BOB Jodhpur 3. BG No, 1872IGP000896020 dated 13.10.2020 amounting to Rs 1,00,00,000/- valid up to 11.04.2021 Above BGs are in process of renewal, contractor shall submit the BG before expiring the old one. b. Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by, has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact, There are no critical commercial conditions observed.5. ¢. Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Payments needs to expedited as less than 50% payment made against total work done Financial Performance: 1, Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project PHED is not liable to contribute in the funds, and total funds received til this inspection is 9.40 Cr. 100% of the released funds has been utilized in the said project. Balance billed outstanding of contractor is 11.08 Cr. Works are getting delayed due to payment. ‘b, Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any). 100 % of the funds have been utilized at the project. ¢. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made. Such documents will include — Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, etc, IRMA reviewed documents related to claim, the total payment paid upto 9" RA ( Rs 2.75 Cr 9.40 Cr. against the Cumulative amount (upto 9” RA) Rs, 21.11Cr work done Rs 11.08 C pending, (Net Bill amount is Rs 20.48 Crie, (9.40 Cr + 11.8 Cr) 4. Ifany discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? Due to nonpayment to contractor, inefficient use of resources and project is getting delayed . Ifthere is any major variation in the overall project cost (+5 %) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. £. Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any Required to financial disbursement at the earliest. g. Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate, Compliance to the statutory requirements a, Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry: No required b. Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site. During visit at site, IRMA found that Contractor has arranged all necessary health and safety equipment’s at site, Adequate first aid facilities approved by a health authority have maintained and ‘made available in every labor camp for the emergency treatment of injured persons,Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. During at site, IRMA found that contractor has maintained standard of health and sanitation arrangements at camp site. |. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons ‘There is no resettlement and rehabilitation Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. There is no matter of resettlement and rehabilitation. Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records. ‘No compensations . Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. ‘No court CasesSite Progress photos 8.10.2020 Vaishali Nagar PS, Jen Office Consumer Centre and Suhash Nagar PSReporting Format for Water Supply Project IL. Construction Stage (Oct. 2020) 1, Common Attributes: ‘Ae General Details a, Name of State : Rajasthan b, Name of City: Alwar c. Name of Project : Execution of the work of Re organization UWSS and UWSS alwar (District Alwar) with 7 years O & M including 01 year Defect liability period i.e design (selected part) Build Operate and Mai d, Project Code: RAJ-ALW-005 e. Approved Project Cost in SAAP: Rs. 90.62 Cr. (SAAP-I , 50.0 Cr. +SAAP-II, 40.62 Cr.) f. Project included in which SAAP i.e. VMI: SAAP I & IL g. Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details i.e. SAAP-I, II or Ill: SAAP- 18 h. Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 94 i. Name of Reviewing Agency (IRMA): Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. JV with JPS Associates J. Date of Review : 06.10.2020 k. Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit: Sanjay Kumar, Technical Expert 1 Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal etc.): PHED, Alwar m, Key Concemed Officer (s) interacted during review : Mr. Bijender AEn (PHED, Alwar) n. Number of visits already made for the project : 05, this is 6" B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA a. Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 3" SLTC Dated 25.04.2016 a) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: In Ist me approval of DPRs. ing dated 04.09.2015 SHPSC authorized to SLTC for b. Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (R&P). If there is any delay please give reasons: NIT No, ACE/NCR/2016-17/10 ¢. Publication Details of NIT: Could not traced 4d, Date of issue of Work Order: 31.03.2017 fe. Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 10.04.2017 f. Actual date of start of work: 10.04.2017 g. Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd.hh. Contractual Amount, Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Work Order Amount: Rs, 90.62 Cr. (Capital Cost: Rs. 69.11 Cr., Provisional Sum: Rs. 1.54 Cr., SBM cost: Rs. 15.57 Cr., O&M Cost: Rs. 4.66 Cr.) 2. Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: Mile Stone Rescheduled Project | Targeted For % oe | eeesons for | “date based | Advise on Milestone | the remedial Component | The Period As Per eel ace on feces plan ne v performance ssures Total | Target | Achieved Quantity | Quantity] Quantity 452 Noonan) (Revised | 452 | 3720 | 99.62% 373.4) OHSR, iTiCampus | 1 1 a (Nos) OHSR, Govind , PHED may be Praga 1 1 1 100% mivatioo = Nest 7 provide OHSR, they Park) 1 1 100% source L = 7 connection OrBA, Raneat Permission not | 20.12.2020 | Sowrenten a 1 | 095 | 95% | getting from Nager connection to (OHSR, Shiv Colon UIT, for major OHSR, Ranjeet " stony) a 1 1 100% | road cutting in . (Nos) cy. Nagar. SR, OWSR, Rath Nagar | 1 7 To0N Electric fasinates (Nos) ‘connections: oan = Cae complete the , Malviya l balance minor Nagar : : ‘ 100% | provided by works at the OHSR, Chetan ED? earliest sothat 1 1 1 100% Enclave / work can be 7 sae (List) Details of ca wR Campus | (00% House ; vin ‘ , 1 1 1 100% | Connections |___nager are not ce cwR, Ambedkar 1 1 1 100% {plants etc.) _| the campus CWR, Chetan 1 1 1: 100% area of pump Enclave - stations. ~_ ewe, MIA 1 1 i 100% Pump house, Mi | 1 as | osx Campus Pump house, Govind nagar + 1 095 | 95% Pump house, Ambedkar Park | * : 095 | 95% Pump house, Chetanenclave | * ‘i | Pump house, MIA | 1 1 | 095 | 95%If any discrepancy is observed, while reviewing the project, the IRMA agency may suggest wild Pea | PHED may be Consumer advised to Connection/ | 12421 | 12421 | 4537 | 36.5% cute the meters connections at the earliest Tube Well 61 61 100% | 61 | ConsumerCare | : 1 = centre |? Store & Jen building yi? 1 100% SCADA Building at | : : fom Manu marg | | a. Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of water supply system ete. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector b, Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of 3. progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. IRMA consultant also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate. ‘Yes mechanism has been put in place for monthly updation of AMRUT portal for physical/financial progress of project along with photographs on mAMRUT app by RUDSICO. Quality Assurance a. Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports. ‘The Cube sample is taking from ready to cast material. There is lab established at construction site with site office. The aggregate, sand WBM Material test has being conducted at every 7 days and 28 days at site lab in the presence of PHED representatives. Cube strength test has recorded in the register at site Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for Cement, Steel, ete. b, Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records During site visit, IRMA found satisfactorily quality of construction materials used in the proj t. €. Ifany deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify During visit, no found any deviation against specifications as given in the DPR. ‘As per DPR, one OSHR proposed in zone -7 but due to no availability of land, the same is shifted and constructed at ITI campus in Zone-6, 4d. When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurance! check results There are no issues related to quality, e. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions. Commercial Performance: conduct necessary tests to check the quality of the materials used.a, Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, ie. performance with respect to clauses such as — guarantee / warranty, defects-liability, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, ete, (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that ULB has followed and maintained all above mentioned ~ licenses. Bank guarantee, insurance etc, and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with deduction of tax (as per Govt. rules) As per agreement between contractor and PHED, Contractor has submitted Bank Guarantee. Details as given below BG No.- 0607018BG0000712 of Rs.108637000 Cr. As performance guaranty b, Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact. Thete is no critical commercial terms and conditions. ©. Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters, 5. Financial Performance: a. Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project All the counter parties contributed their fund parts. b. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any). Total 53.63 Cr. ized on the project. ©. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made, Such documents will Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, etc. IRMA reviewed documents related to claim. The total payment has been paid upto 8" RA bill of gross amount Rs.53.63 Cr. till Jan.2020. ‘The payment has been made after deductions as per agreement. d. If any discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During Documents review, no found any discrepancy in the above. ¢. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. f. Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any From 8th RA bill, Rs. 2.29 Cr. still pends to pay. contractor has submitted RA bills upto 11" and same certified by the PHED, Total Rs.16.31 Cris still outstanding including price escalation amount, Price escalation also pending to pay. g. Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate. Compliance to the statutory requirements Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencit i environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental meee es project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. No environmental clearance requirede Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site. During visit at camp site, IRMA found that Contractor has arranged all necessary health and safety equipment’s at site. Contractor deploys new workers at site after conducting health and safety training and contractor reviews health and safety measure time to time. Adequate first aid facilities approved by a health authority have maintained and made available in every labor camp for the emergency treatment of injured persons. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual dbservation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. During visit at site, IRMA found that contractor has maintained standard of health and sanitation arrangements at camp site. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons The project is being executed on road side. Therefore there is no issue of Resettlement and Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acqui team and the DPR. Due to no required of land acquisitions, there is no matter of resettlement and rehabilitation. Report on compensation awarded and / oF to be paid as per the records ‘No compensations Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. No court Cases,Site Progress Photos (06.10.2020_Water Supply, Alwar) ii re a) by °) 4 e) f) n) B a) ») °) Reporting Format for Water supply project TL. Construction Stage ( Oct. 2020) Common Attributes: General Details, Name of State: Rajasthan Name of City: Baran Name of Project: Execution of the work of reorganization of Urban Water Supply Scheme (UWSS) Baran with 07 years operation and maintenance including 01 year defect liability period under AMRUT Mission, Project Code: RAJ-BAR-001, RAJ-BAR-005 Approved Project Cost in SAAP: 50 + 28.31 = 78.31 Cr. Project included in which SAAP ie, V/IVII: SAAP —1 & Il Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details ie. SAAP-I, II or IL: Yes, SAP -1& II Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 30 & 114 Name of Reviewing Agency(IRMA) : Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd JV JPS Associates Date of Review : 22/10/2020 Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit : Rajeev Dagla Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal ete.): PHED, Baran Key Concemed Officer (5) interacted during review : A En Mr. DR Mehta PHED Number of visits already made for the project: 05, this is 6" visit. Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact ‘on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA. Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 3rd SLTC on 25.04.2016 Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 04.09.2015 & 11.05.2015 Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RIP). If there is any delay please give reasons: 30/16-17, 27.01.2017Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as per the requirement 4d) Publication Details of NIT: Could not trace €) Date of issue of Work Order: 24.05.2017 £) Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 03.06.2017 2) Scheduled Date of Completion as per WO: 02.06.2019 h) Actual Date of Completion : Work in progress i) Actual date of start of work: 24.05.2017 i) Name of Contractor! Executing agency: M/S OIL ~ LAHOTY JV, Mumbai Contractual Amount. Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Capital Cost: 74.80 Cr., O&M Cost: 8.31 Cr., Total Cost: 83.11 Cr. 2. Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: Project Millstone Targeted for Po Reason for | Rescheduled | Advice on ‘Component the period as per plan [Milestone | delay date based | remedial completed on measures performance BOQ | Tare | Executed Qty. jet Quy. __| Ory. - : 370 | 3 | 200 54% pipeline - km, | 1. Non 1. Collage campus availability of Head-works, VT tT 09 95% | funds 2, Due to non 2. Amb: ae 1 1 0.70 70% | availability of : sand, Esha Ni 1 1 0.95 95% Most of the eatin 1 1 1.00 100% | 3 Due to land civil works Gopalpura, encroachment are 5. ESR at Mel 1 1 095 95% | on almost all ‘complete, Kheri__ of the project but laying of 6. ESR Gajanpura, [1 1 0.95 95% | sites, work | Contractor | pipe line is 7.ESRTalawara [1 H 0.95 95% | was delayed | applied — for | behind the BESR for 6 months. | Extension schedule, lakshmipura 1 1 a 95% | 4.No work | 21.06.2021 | PHED may 9. ESR Shiwali = started due to | (due for | be advised to Nawar 1 1 1 100% | problem in | approval) speed the 1OESR Shahbad land pipe laying Darwaja. ' 1 095 95% | allotment. sothat work 11. ESR Lanka corona can Colony ! 1 0.95 95% | Pandemic. completed at sar the earliest. 12 Ey Ba 1 1 os 80% Nagar Connections | 7613 | 7613 | 1000 14% House water meter | 7613 | 7613 | 0 0% 13. Intek well at Madre 1 1 04 40% 14, ExEn-SE 1 i 0 %Residence a | PumpHtoue | 1-1) 2m 3 Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g, number of taps, or coverage of water supply system ete. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector As Above Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. IRMA Technical Expert also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate. Progress is not being uploaded on AMRUT portal. Quality Assurance ‘Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports Contractor has established a lab at site office (in Storage yard). Sieve Set, Slump Cone, verniar calipers, measuring devices, and weight machines ete are available at the Lab. various tests are conducted by contractor. PHED officers remain present at the time tests. Test results are recorded in the register at site; presently as there is no progress on works test records are available at contractor's office. The relevant tests are done on a routine basis as per the provisions of the relevant Indian Standards. Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for Cement, Steel, pipes. Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records Quality of construction material is satisfactory, Record of quality tests are being maintained at the contractor's office. Regular monitoring of quality is being done by PHED and there is no PMC or 3° Parties engaged for inspection of material and works. Ifany deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify ‘Any deviation against specifications as given in the DPR was not observed. When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurance check results No major issued. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions. During the site visit, Consultant reviewed quality and no major non-conformance was found. Commercial Performance: ‘Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, ie. performance with respect to clauses such as ~ guarantee / warranty, defects-tiability, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that ULB has followed and maintained all above mentioned — licenses. Bank guarantee, insurance ete. and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with deduction of tax (as per Govt. rules) Contractor has submitted Bank Guarantee an impact on time and cost ofthe project along with quantum of impact Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by cin ‘There is no any critical commercial terms and conditions between parties =x 0c. Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters, Financial Performance: ‘a, Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements, In case of delay, mention impact on project Allotment of budget for AMRUT is issued by CE (Urban & NRW), PHED, Jaipur as per requirement. There is no bifurcation of share mention on that. So, bifurcation of share cannot be done at division office 36.77 Cr Total Received, 35.50 Cr has been paid to Contractor and 1.27 Lacs has been paid to other Agencies. b. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconcifiation statements. Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any). PHED received Rs.36,77Cr. under AMRUT. 100% of the funds have been utilized for the project. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made. Such documents will inelude ~ Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, ete. IRMA Technical Expert reviewed documents related to claim. The total payment has been paid amount Rs 35.50 Cr. Till Oct 2020, 15" RA bill. The payment has been made after deductions as per agreement (As Govt. Rules) MB and other records are being maintained. 17" RA has been raised by contractor, of amount 39.05 Cr. 35.50 = 3.55 Cr, Certified amounts is due for payment to the contractor. Unbilled value ‘of work done till date 2,00 Cr. 4d. Uf any discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During Documents review, no found any discrepaney in the above. €. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in deta additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. . Also report on £, Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any Financial disbursement may be streamlined and made faster. Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management System is adequate for financial management 6. Compliance to the statutory requirements a. Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. No environmental clearance required '. Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site. Health and safety measures are taken by the contractor adequately. ©. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at dj ‘observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholdersare local labour and they return to their houses after day’s work. There is no labour hutment. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons ‘There is no requirement of Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. Not applicable Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records, No compensations ‘Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. As of now, No court Cases.Site progress photos (Water supply) Baran_22/10/2020Reporting Format for Water Supply Project Il. Commissioning, Trial Run and Testing Stage (Oct. 2020) Common Attributes A> General Details 4) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Beawar ©) Name of Project: “Execution of the work of Re organization and Rehabilitation of Urban Water Supply Scheme, Beawar (District Ajmer) with 7 yeats Operation & maintenance Including O1 year defect liability period ie, design (selected part), Build Operate and maintenance. d) Project Code: RAJ-BEA-001& RAJ-BEA-005 €) Approved Project Cost in SAAP: 28.53 Cr 4) Project included in which SAAP ic. VIVIII: SAP —1& II 8) Whether the project falls in more than one SAP. If yes please provide details ie. SAAP-I, Il or I: SAAP — Tel hh) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 129, 92 a) Name of Reviewing Agency(IRMA) : SREI Infrastructure Finance Limited JV with IPS Associates, i) Date of Review : 9.10.2020 i) Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit : Mr. Rajendra Arya k)_ Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal etc.): PHED, Beawar, District Aimer 1) Key Concerned Officer (s) interacted during review: PHED AEn Mr. Gehlot, PHED JEn. Mr Lakhan Meena, ‘m) Number of visits already made forthe project: 6th B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA impact on project, a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 2" SLTC on dated 21.03.2016 b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 04.09.2015 & 11.05.2016 c) Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RP). Ifthere is any delay please give reasons: 16.01.20172 3. 5 Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as per the requirement 4) Publication Details of NIT: Could not traced €) Date of issue of Work Order: 30.06.2017 f) Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 30.06.2017 8) Actual date of stat of work: 30.6,2017 fh) Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s Jagdish Prakash Agarwal ’) Contractual Amount, Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAP: Capital Cost: 28.61 Cr; O&M: 3.33 Cr, Work order Cost: 32.15 Cr Provide comments on handing over of all documentation, “As Built” drawings, operational instructions and equipmertt manuals to the O&M team and list the same T_ [As built General Arrangement Drawings Yes 2 {As built Detailed Engineering Design Drawings Yes 3 [As built Drawings for Miscellaneous components Yes 4 [Test & Investigation Reports Yes 3 [Materials report Yes 6 [third party certificates Yes 7 0 & M Manual (Including equipment manuals) Yes Provide comments on level of participation during testing by the O&M team, PHED staff Jen, AEn, & Executive Engineer has participated during testing, Name of the experts and Engineers Participated in traning is as follows:~ 1.Mr. Rajender Kumar Jaiman (XEn, PHED) 2.Mr. Shiv Dev Gehlot (AEn PHED) 3.Mr. Surender Kumar Tanwar JEn, PHED) 4.Mr. Lakhan Lal Meena (JEn, PHED) 5.Mr. Vaibhav Sabnani (Engineer, M/s Jagdish) Report about the adequacy of training provided to the O/M team in terms of the following: Higher Level staff, Manager O&M Mr. Vaibhav Sabnani is well experienced and trained in the O&M of the ‘water supply. List of trained staff is as under: Mr. Vaibhav Sabnani (Manager) Mr. Pushpender (Plumber) Mr. Govind (Plumber) Mr. Raju Singh (Plumber) Mr. Brijesh Electrician) Mr. Sunil (Fitter) Mr. Aashram (Labour) Aaya eNe Report about the Trial run / testing of the projects completed?6 Indicate the problems / performance level of the plants /machinery during trial run stage? No any problems occurred during trail run stage and performance level achieved as per prefixed milestone. If the performance level of the plants and machinery is not adequate and satisfactory, list the correction measures suggested? Plants and machinery provided are performing adequately. Provide details on the assessment of the O&M arrangement for the project, specifically of its adequacy, financial arrangement and sustainabili Project is presently under Defect Liability Period for one year from date of completion of work 30.05.2019. Presently O&M arrangements are adequate, Required to monitor and maintain the water testing, reports at lab. Provide details on the expected outcomes from the projects and quantification in terms of achievement of service level benchmarks By providing two OHSR, Service level and pressure problem of the distribution area are improved and some additional area is covered for water supply. By replacement of old and defective pipe line, leakage problem has been solved. Four old OHSR repaired thus improved water supply and leakage problem solved.Reporting Format for Water Supply Project ning, Trial Run and Testing Stage (Oct. 2020) IL, Commi 1, Common Attributes: A General Details a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Bharatpur ©) Name of Project: Execution of the work of Re Organization Urban water Supply Schem Bharatpur with 7 year Operation & Maintenance including 01 year defect liability period ic. design (Selected part), Build, Operate and Maintain. 4) Project Code: RAJ-BHA-006 ©) Approved Project Cost in SAAP: Rs. $0.00 Cr. 1) Project included in which SAAP i.e. IVI: SAAP II] 8) Whether the project falls in more than one SAP. If yes please provide details i.e. SAAP-I, Mor IL: No h) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 11 i) Name of Reviewing Agency(IRMA): Stei Infrastructure Finance Ltd, JV with JPS Associates 5) Date of Review: 12.10.2020 k) Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit: Mr. Sanjay Kumar 1) Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal etc.): PHED, Bharatpur m) Key Concerned Officer (s) interacted during review: AEn, Mr. Ravindra Choudhary, PHED n) Number of visits already made for the project: 05, This is 6" Visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA. a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 7 SLTC dt. 02.12.2016 b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 3” SHPSC dt, 28.10.2016 ©) Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (R&P). If there is any delay please give reasons: NIT issued dt. 20.06.2017Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as 2 6. per the requirement 4) Publication Details of NIT: Times of India. 25.06.17, Dainik Bhaskar 26.06.17 ©) Date of issue of Work Order: 11.12.2017 f) Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 21.12.2017 8) Actual date of start of work: 21.12.2017 h) Name of Contractor/ Executing ageney: M/s Bhooratnom Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. — Yadav Construction Co. (JV) i) Contractual Amount, Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Work Order Amount: Rs, 63,31 Cr. (Rs.13.31 Cr. is more than approved amount in SAAP) Provide comments on handing over of all documentation, “As Built” drawings, operational instructions and equipment manuals to the O&M team and list the same 1 | As built General Arrangement Drawings Yes 2 | As built Detailed Engineering Design Drawings Yes; 3 | As built Drawings for Miscellaneous components Yes 4 | Test & Investigation Reports Yes 3 | Materials report Yes © | Third panty certificates Yes 7 | O&M Manual (Including equipment manuals) Yes Provide comments on level of participation during testing by the O&M team, PHED JEn, AEn, & Executive Engineer and other staff have been participated during testing. Report about the adequacy of training provided to the O/M team in terms of the following: List of trained staff is as under: 1. (Project Manager) - 01 2. Fitter) - 06 3. (Supervisor) - 04 4, (Assistant) — 04 3. Valve man- 12 6. Pump Operator — 03 7. SCADA Operator 01 8. Labour~ 08 9. Chemist - 02 Report about the Trial run / testing of the projects completed? The trail run ‘testing has been conducted in presence in Xen, AEn and other staff of the PHED. The project in under DLP/O&M stage. Indicate the problems / performance level of the plants /machinery during trial runstage? No any problems occurred during trail run stage and performance level achieved as per "oe bs _ De)If the performance level of the plants and machinery is not adequate and satisfactory, list the correction measures suggested? Plants and machinery provided are performing adequately. Provide details on the assessment of the O&M arrangement for the project, specifically of its adequacy, financial arrangement and sustainability. As per agreement, O&M of the water supply system is being done by the contractor executed the works. ‘The PHED will arrange the finance by their own sources. Provide details on the expected outcomes from the projects and quantification in terms of achievement of service level benchmarks, 20,000 nos. of water meter installed and 3146 house service connection has been done. After the project execution, the water supply has been improved. After the completion of the scheme, beneficiaries getting more quantity of water. Water pressure has been improved. Note:- the construction stage has been completed on dated 19.12.2019. PHED has received 36.96 Cr. under AMRUT and utilised the same on the project. Contractor has been received Rs.36.96 Cr. upto 6" and final RA bill but Rs.13.66 Cr. still outstanding since more than 1 year. PHED may be advised to release the pending payment at the earliest.Site Progress Photos (Water Supply, Bharatpur), Dated 12/10/2020Reporting Format for Water Supply Project II. Construction Stage (Oct. 2020) 1, Common Attributes: A> General Details a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Bhilwara ©) Name of Project: Execution of the work of reorganization of Urban Water Supply Scheme (UWSS) Bhilwara with 07 years operation and maintenance including 01 year defect liability period i.e, design Build operate and maintenance (Selected part) under AMRUT Mission. d) Project Code: RAJ-BHI-001 ©) Approved Project Cost in SAAP: 25.0 Cr. £) Project included in which SAAP i.e. VII/IL: SAAP 1 2) Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details i.e. SAAP-I, Il or IN: No h) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 148 a) Name of reviewing agency(IRMA): Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. JV with JPS Associates b) Date of review: 27.10.2020 ) Name of personnel of review agency making the site visit: Mr.Sanjay Kumar 4) Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal etc.): PHED, Bhilwara ©) Key Concerned Officer (s) interacted during review: AEn- Mr. B.L. Saini, PHED, Mr.Hukamram, is 6" visit £) Number of visits already made for the project: 05, thi B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 2" SLTC on 21.3.2016 b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 04.09.2015 ©) Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RFP). If there is any delay please give reasons: 16.01.2017 ) Publication Details of NIT: 16.01.2017 dali J)Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as per the requirement e) Date of issue of Work Order: 30.6.2017 £) Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 10.07.2017 g) Actual date of start of work: 10.07.2017 h) Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/S Balaji Construction Company, Jodhpur i) Contractual Amount. Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Capital Cost 23.12 Cr., O&M 2.86 Cr., Work Order 25.98 Cr. 2. Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: ~ ~ | Rescheduled % Reasons | date based | Advise on Sl | Project | Mile Stone Targeted For The |Milestone forthe | on remedial No. | Component | Period As Per plan ‘completed | delay _| performance | measures BOQ Target ‘| Executed | Quantity | Quantity | Quantit _ - 52338 i 1 | Fixing of Revised- | 52338 | 31930 | 61.0% Required fo water meters_| 35000 _| ay the workor ‘Making house service house 2 | service 23618 23618 1890 8.0% | connections service Connection. t are delayed connection. Intake well because of 3 | pumping 1 1 1 100% public station _|_ | resistance to 4 | Rehabilitation | 4g rr 18 100% | fixingthe | Rescheduled | of Reservoirs |__| house water date revised Rehabilitation meter. | 31.12.2020 | BOQof of 27.4 Water 14 1 100% Work fixing of 5 | Treatment progress water Plant [ slow due to motors as Construction ‘monsoon, per 6 | of Master 1 1 1 100% curtailment control centre Delayed due limit by a to Covid BICISE or 7 | of Consumer 1 1 1 100% higher | Scare centre Authority. curtailment limit upto A&F sanction by EIC/SE or higher Authority. a. Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, os supply system ete, Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs; As given above Immediate required to finalise the revised BOQ of fixing of water motors as perb. Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs, IRMA consultant also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate. Not updated regularly, concerned officer is advised to update the work progress. 3. Quality Assurance a. Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports. Pipes, Specials are inspected at the manufacturer's premises by two officers. Manufacturer’s certificate of material are maintained by Contractor/PHED. Testing by a 3" laboratory is not in practice. PHED is advised to get random samples tested at NABL accredited laboratory. Quality of construction material Sand, Cement aggregate is monitored by JE-PHED, IRMA found the quality satisfactory. Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for pipe, Cement, Steel, etc. Cube testing machine is not available at site because there is no major concrete in this project. b. Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records During site visit, found quality of construction materials used as per standard. c. Ifany deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify No found any deviation against specifications as given in the DPR. 4. When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurance! check results. There are no issues related to quality. e. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions. During site visit, IRMA reviewed quality and no found of any case of non-conformance at site, 4. Commercial Performance: a, Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, i.e. performance with respect to clauses such as ~ guarantee / warranty, defects-liability, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that PHED has followed and maintained all above documents. b. Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact, There is no any critical commercial terms and conditions c. Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters. conduct necessary tests to check the quality of the materials used.5. a 6. e Financial Performance: Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project PHED is not liable to contribute for funds, only Gol and GR is contributing funds but the bifurcation of funds is not available at the PHED -Bhilwara office, Total funds received are Rs. 8.08 Cr. which has been completely utilized. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation. IRMA verified fund utilization document and found no variation Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made. Such documents will include — Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, etc, IRMA reviewed documents related to claim. Rs. 8,08 Cr. upto RA bill 3 has been paid and Rs.3.28 Cr upto 4" is still outstanding and 5" RA bill of Rs.4.0 Cr. under Certification by the PHED If any discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During Documents review, no found any discrepancy in the above. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. There is no any variation in the overall project cost. Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any Contractor has executed more quantity and Rs. 7.0 Cr. is pending therefore required to financial disbursement at the earliest. Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate. Compliance to the statutory requirements Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. No environmental clearance required Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site. Contractor has provided health and safety equipment to the workers. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders.. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons There is no issue of Resettlement and Rehabilitation. . Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. Not applicable Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records. ‘No compensations . Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. ‘No court Cases,Site Progress Photos (27.10.2020)Reporting Format for Water Supply Project IL. Construction Stage (Oct. 2020 visit) 1. Common Attributes: a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Bhiwadi ©) Name of Project: Execution of the work of Re organization UWSS and UWSS Bhiwadi (District Alwar) with 7 years © & M including 01 year Defect liability period i.e design (selected part) Build Operate and Maintain, d) Project Code: RAJ-SIK-002 €) Approved Project Cost in SAAP: Rs. 20.0 Cr. Project included in which SAAP ie. VIVII: SAAP -I g) Whether the project falls in more than one SAP. If yes please provide details i.e. SAAP-I, II or IIL: h) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 48 i) Name of Reviewing Agency (IRMA): Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd JV with JPS Associates i) Date of Review : 05.10.2020 k)_ Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, 1) Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal ete.): PHED, Bhiwadi m) Key Concerned Officer (s) interacted during review: AEn. Mr. Bhanupratap Singh (PHED, Bhiwadi) n) Number of visits already made for the project ; 05, this is 6” visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact on Project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 3 SLTC dt. 25.04.2016 b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 04.09.2015 ) Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (REP). If there is any delay please give reasons: NIT No. ACE/NCR/2016-17/10, 28.10.2016 ) Publication Details of NIT: Information could not traced ©) Date of issue of Work Order: 31.03.2017 f) Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 10.04.2017 g) Actual date of start of work: 24.01.2018 h) Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd.i) Contractual Amount. Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Work Order Amount: Rs. 15.07 Cr, 2. Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: Mile Stone Targeted For Reasons for [Rescheduled] iso) The Period As Per plan _|% Milestone date based Component Completed| he on remedial delay measures performance) Total | Target | Achieved Quantity) Quantity! Quantity Water Supply ‘AS no payment Networkikey | S22 | St9 | 529 100% padto Rising Main (Km) | 841 | 8.41 | 80 95% contractor since Pipeline testing | 60.31 | 60.31 | 55.9 Oct. 2018. (OSHR (Bhagat Singh oe eee PHED may be Rien 1 1 | o9 90% Shortage of advised to ny) _| fund, release partial OHSR, Sector -9 1 1 | 095 95% Contractor payment and OHSR, (UITSector- | 1 | 090 90% ‘works slowly complete the 2) No payment | 31.12.2020 | balance work OHSR (Sector9 | 1 | 090 | 90% paid to within revised extension) " contractor time line, Office Building 1_| 070 70% since Oct. 18 Store Building 1__| 090 90% | PHED may be Aén Residence 1 0.95 95% | advised to = | provide source ISCADA & consumer’ connection to ae 1 1 | oss 55% OHSS immediately ‘a. Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of water supply system etc, Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. IRMA consultant also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate. For the updation of progress on AMRUT portal, m AMRUT APP is stalled in Mobile phone no. of concern AB/JE of the town, which is linked with mobile no, of AB /JE of the town, An OTP (one time password is required to access and uploading the photos. Concern AE/JE updates the progress on Portal once in 15 days. Quality Assurance Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (REI) and reports. The Cube sample is taking from ready to cast material. There is lab established at construction site with site office. The aggregate, sand WBM Material test has being conducted at every 7 days and 28days at site lab in the presence of PHED representatives. Cube strength test has recorded in the register at Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for Cement, Steel, etc. records During site visit, found quality of construction materials used as per standard. ication as given in the DPR, please specify If any deviation against sp Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project we ay ‘sh = os a tan the eyNo found any deviation against specifications as given in the DPR. d. When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail ‘on quality assurancel check results ‘There are no issues related to quality. e. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions, During site visit, IRMA found no work execution activity at site. Commercial Performance: a, Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, performance with respect to clauses such as — guarantee / warranty, defectstiability, licenses, bank ‘guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that ULB has followed and maintained all above mentioned — licenses. Bank guarantee, insurance ete. and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with deduction of tax (as per Govt. rules) ‘As per agreement between contractor and PHED, Contractor has submitted Bank Guarantee. Details as given below BG No.- 0607018BG0000712 of Rs. 108637000 Cr. As performance guaranty b, Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact, Incentive option may be explore for completion of the project before time by the contractor ©, Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters. S. Financial Performan a, Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project All the counter parties contributed their fund parts. b. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any), IRMA reviewed bank reconciliation statement and found fund utilized on the concerned project only. ©. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made, Such documents will include ~ Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, ete. IRMA reviewed documents related to claim. The total payment has been paid to contractor of gross amounting Rs. 5.5 Cr¥ ‘The payment has been made after deductions as per agreement. ‘The 5.65 Cr. is still pending due to shortage of fund with PHED. d. Ifany discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During Documents review, no found any discrepancy in the above. date, €. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5%) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. “If any discrepancy is observed, while reviewing the project, the IRMA agency may suggest to the PEA to conduct necessary tests to check the quality of the materials used.Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any Required to financial disbursement at the earliest. Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate. Compliance to the statutory requirements Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. No environmental clearance required Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site. During visit at camp site, IRMA found that Contractor has arranged all necessary health and safety equipment’s at site. Contractor deploys new workers at site after conducting health and safety training and contractor reviews health and safety measure time to time, Adequate first aid facilities approved by a health authority have maintained and made available in every labor camp for the emergency treatment of injured persons. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. During visit at site, IRMA found that contractor has maintained standard of health and sanitation arrangements at camp site. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons There is no issue of Resettlement and Rehabilitation. Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. ‘The land is transferred from UIT and RICO and there is no matter of resettlement and rehabilitation, Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records. No compensations Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. No court Cases,Site Progress Photos (Water Supply, Bhiwadi)_05.10.2020 ‘OHSR, Bhagat Singh colony Pump Replacement Control PenalReporting Format for Water Supply Project II. Construction Stage (Oct 2020) 1. Common Attributes: A- General Details a) Name of State : Rajasthan b) Name of City : Bikaner ©) Name of Project: Execution of the work of Re Organization Urban water Supply Scheme Bikaner with 7 year Operation & Maintenance including 01 year defect liability period ice design (Selected part), Build, Operate and Maintenance. 4) Project Code: RAJ/BIK-003 ©) Approved Project Cost in SAAP: Rs. 34.95 Crs. ) Project included in which SAAP i.e. I/V/II: SAAP-IT 8) Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details i. SAAP-I, Il or IIl.: No bh) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 72 i) Name of Reviewing Agency(IRMA): SREI Infrastructure Finance Limited JV with JPS Associates i) Date of Review: 12.10.2020 k)_ Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit: Rajeev Dagla 1) Implementing Ageney (Example: ULB/ Parastatal etc.): PHED, Bikaner m) Key Concemed Officer (s) interacted during review: Sanjay Pal Support Engineer PDMC , Contrator's PM Mangilal Bishnoi. n) Number of visits already made for the project: 05, This is 6" visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 6" SLTC on 25.10.2016 b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 28.10.2016 ©) Date of Issue of Notie Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RJP)sIfhere is any delay please give reasons: 14.07.2017 (So On. y OsNote: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the diseretion to change the Reporting Formats as per the requirement 2 4) Publication Details of NIT: Could not traced e) Date of issue of Work Order: 02.02.2018 f) Scheduled Date of Start as per WO; 12.02.2018 8) Actual date of start of work: 12.02.2018 h) Scheduled date of Completion: 11.02.2020 i) Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s GA Infra Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur J) Contractual Amount. Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: work Order: Rs. 36.85 Cr. Including O & M (33.9 Cr Establishment+2.95 Cr. O&M). Allotted work value is higher by Rs. 1.90 Cr from the approved in SAAP. Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: , Rescheduled] S| pret vies Tarte or ORE) Resomsor REA agi on Xo | Component ThePeriod AS er DID Connie] ety OR | Rear " "p performan BOQ | Target] Executed Quantity | Quantiy) Quantity Providing laying iT : jointing of DI rising 9900 (11351 * V main & Distribution | 1444 | 15444 | ica) | 4% 125mm to $00 mm di 1. Contract | or may be Providing lying a notified for jointing of HOPE . slow 2 | Gistribution 125mm to| 35534 | 35534 Gopplied ia progress 300mm ) 2, PHED 3 z may be 3. | OHSR 1400 KL ' ' 050 90% | Fund non Extended | advised to i = availability. | by 6 expedite ae and Fixing oft 2000 ie 2.Permission from | months ie. | the process water meters % | NHnotobtained | 12 Aug | of gettin 4 | Standard muttijet | 769 | 26609) rootied but not | > 2020” | permission 24433, AMR 2106) fixed ) from NH I authority. © | Connections ast) as 00 3% pair w ‘al 3. Funds 7 | Resi worksa'Goan] 1 1 v00% | sana |* streamlined OHSR 1800 KL 8 | Rehabilitation work at] 1 1 1 100% Goga gateMaster Control Centre with Provision of ‘Consumer Care 1 Il 1 100% Centre at Addl CE office Ganganagar Road Provision for leak detection equipment ‘TAP and water quality testing equipment 3 kits per lot 0 0 0% Rejuvenation of tube wells 61 61 61 100% | Repair of RWRs Bichhwal & Shobhasar Lining (20% ) + Service 1 1 030 30% Road (40%) + Extemal Drainage system(40%) 13 4 ‘Consumer care Center at Vyas 1 1 1 100% Colony ‘Consumer care Center at 1 1 0.6 60% Gangashahar Consumer eare Center at Ad CE 1 1 0.80 80% office Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of water supply system ete. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector. As above Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. IRMA consultant also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate Photos are updated regularly; PDMC Support engineer Mr. Nikhil Khandelwal updates work pr 3 regular basis. But in presence of IRMA consultant photos cannot be uploaded because of limit. /- 2B Quality Assurance E( New Rain’) = Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality. onumelgene by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports. Contractor has not established laboratory. Compression testing is done by external agencies. Sieve Set, Slump Cone, venire calipers, measuring devices, and weight machines ete are available with contractor. SBC, Steel and Cube strength test are done at Govt Collage of Engineering and Technology, Bikaner, Test Jsrecords are maintained at office of contractor. The relevant tests are done on a routine basis as per the provisions of the relevant Indian Standards; Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for Cement, Steel, pipes. Quality Control Wing of PHED also makes random tests at site at nonscheduled inspection visits; one such inspection was conducted in April 2019. Selective tests are done of randomly selected samples by PHED engineers by National Test House, Jaipur (Govt. approved) is inspecting of HDPE pipes. ‘There is no provision for PMC or 3" parties for material and works inspection. b. Observe and report on the quality of construction materi records. Quality of Cement, Pipes, aggregate, and concrete etc is found satisfactory and as per standard. And testing of the same is being maintained as per standards. used in the project and ascertain from the c. Ifany deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify ‘No found any deviation against specitications as given in the DPR. d. When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurance! check results. ‘There are no issues related to quality. ©. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions. During site visit, IRMA reviewed quality and no found of any case of non-conformance at site, 2. Commercial Performance: a, Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, i.e. performance with respect to clauses such as ~ guarantee / warranty, defects-tiability, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that PHED has followed and maintained the documents. Contractor gas got the CAR policy, but Bank guarantee is not submitted by contractor so Security deposit is deducted from each payment @ 10%, b, Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact Payment to contractor is not being done in time, Total work done till date is 21.12 Cr. However payment done is only 12.01 Cr. Delay in Payments is affecting the progress of work adversely. © Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance a. Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project 12.01 Cr Rs has been received at PHED Bikaner for this AMRUT project. Bifurcation of Share of Gol and GoR is not available at the PHED Bikaner office. b. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation ‘If any discrepancy is observed,while reviewing the project, the IRMA agency may su conduct necessary tests to check the quality of the materials used. £100% of the AMRUT funds received have been utilized. c. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made. Such documents will include — Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, ete. The payments are made after deductions as per agreement. d. Ifany discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? Delayed payment is hindering the work progress and efficiency, e. Ifthere is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. £. Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any Contractor has executed 21. 12 Cr. works as per the latest bill, total funds received till date are 12.01 Cr. funds may be disbursed to the works may be completed as soon as possible. g. Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate. Financial disbursement needs to be expedited ‘Compliance to the statutory requirements a, Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. ‘No environmental clearance required b. Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site. Contractor has is maintaining proper health and safety equipments at site, Barricading ete are done wherever required. Contractor has complied to observations raised at previous IRMA inspection. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. Contractor has maintained health and sanitation arrangements at camp site, as per compliance to the previous IRMA inspection and monitoring by department. 4d. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons ‘There is no issue of Resettlement and Rehabilitation. e. Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. Not applicable f. Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records. ‘No compensations g. Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. No court Cases,Site Pictures on date of visit 12.10.2020Reporting Format for Water supply project IL. Construction Stage (Oct 2020) 1. Common Attributes: A- General Details a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Bundi ©) Name of Project: Execution of the work of reorganization of Urban Water Supply Scheme (UWSS) Bundi under AMRUT with 07 years operation and maintenance including 01 year defect liability period. 4) Project Code: RAJ-BUN-005 €) Approved Project Cost in SAP: 46,36 Cr. 4) Project included in which SAAP ie. VIV/IIE: SAAP— Il 8) Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details ie, SAAP-I, Il or HL: No hh). Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 05 i) Name of Reviewing Agency (IRMA) :Srei Infrastructure Finance Lid JV IPS Associates i) Date of Review : 20/10/2020 k)__ Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit : Mr. Rajeev Dagla 1) Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal etc.): PHED, Bundi 1m) Key Concerned Officer (5) interacted during review: Mr. Lalit Sharma (PHED, Bundi), Mr. Vivek sharma A.En, (PHED Bundi), Mr Rohit Bishnoi, Contrator’s Engineer. n) Number of visits already made for the project : 5, this is 6" visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, ‘on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA 8) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 3rd SLTC on 25.04.2016 b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 3rd SHPSC on 11.05.2016 ©) Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (REP). If there is any delay please give reasons: NIT issued on 27.01.2017Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to chai per the requirement Publication Details of NIT: The Hindustan Times 02.02.17, Dainik Bhaskar 02.02.17 d) e) 5 8) ‘h) a ) Date of issue of Work Order: 24.05.2017 Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 24.05,2017 Actual date of start of work: 24.05.2017 Name of Contractor! Executing agency: MIS Devendra Construction, Jodhpur , (2) Mis Shivraj Contractor (for Road Restoration) e the Reporting Formats as Contractual Amount, Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Capital Cost: 40.21 Cr., O&M Cost: 4.47 Cr., Total Cost: 44.68 Cr. (2) Shivraj Contractor 5,90 Cr, (0.935 Cr. paid) 2. Physical Progress SI | Project Millstone Targeted for the [7 Reason for hheduled | Advice on no, | Component _| period as per plan [Milestone | delay late based on| remedial Yompleted| formance | measures _| OQ | Target [Executed Distribution ty. | Qty. |ay. pipe line and | rising main 1 [Rising 11.82) 11.82 | 10.52 [89% | taying work main(Km) delay due to PHED may be 2 [CWRat fi T 095 [95% | forest advised to Chattarpura departmentally expedite the (500KL) permission, | Reschedule | project 3 | GLSRat 1 T 095 [95% | Apply to d implementatio Balchand para permission is | completion 0 (900KL) under process. | date is | so that recover 4 |GLSRat T T 080 [80% | as perSHPC | 30.03.2019 | the delayed Modipara direction, the time (900KL) work of road by speed up 3 | Clear Water T T 095 [95% | restoration is the Pump House to be taken up work progress at Chattarpura by PHED 6 [Clear Water | 1 095 [95% | itself. For the Pump House road at restoration Bhatavilas(Ext Tender were 2 invited and it 7 | OHSRat 7 H 0.95 [95% | in process of Navjeevan approval. Now Colony ( 950 the work of KL/22 mtr lying of stagging) pipeline was 8 | OHSR at T H 0:95 [95% | started again LaxmiColony after (700 KL/22 involvement of ‘mit staging) district 9 /OHSRat T T 0:95 [95% | administration. Ranjit Niwas Due to these (50 KL/22 reasons work mir staging) was delayed 10 | OHSR at Indra | 1 T 095 | 95% Colony ( 400 { KL/22 mtr stagging) Ti_[OHSR at I I 095 [95%Chittor Road (400 KL/22 mtr stagging) 2 OFISR at 7 7 095 [95% Bhata vilas( 300 KL/20 mtr stageing) OHSR at T T 095 | 95% CChattarpura ( 300 KL/22 ‘mtr staging) 4 Distribution [163.48] 163.48 | 157.23 | 96% pipe line(Km) 5 Construction | 1 T 095 | 95% of SE office 16 Construction [1 T 0:90 | 90% of Master Control Room 7 is Construction | 1 1 095 | 95% of Consumer care centre ‘Store Room | |__| T 1 095 | 95% 19 PLC/SCADA_|_1 1 0.70 [70% 20 Providing & |14400/ 14400 |" 7000 | 48.6% installation of consumer meter & 2 | House service [13171 13171 | 9180 | 70% connection (13171 Nos) 3. a. Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of water supply system ete. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector Water supply system covers 100% population, No. of house connections to be done: 13171 b. Report on regular updation mAMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. IRMA Technical Expert also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate. Progress is not being uploaded on AMRUT portal, Quality Assurance a. Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports. Contractor has established a lab at site office (in Storage yard). Sieve Set, Slump Cone, verniar calipers, measuring devices, and weight machines ete. are available at the Lab. Concrete cube tests are conducted for every 7 days and 28 days for each lift of concrete in water retaining structures. PHED officers remain present at the time of compression test of cubes. Cube strength test has recorded in the register at site. The relevant tests are done on a routine basis as per the provisions of the relevant Indian Standards, Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for Cement, Steel, pipes (RCC, DWC & PVC-U) Precast manholes ete. Quality Control Wing of PHED also makes random tests at site b, Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records Quality of cement, pipes, aggregate, and concrete etc. is found satisfactorya e. 4 a b c. 5. If any deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify ‘Any deviation against specifications as given in the DPR was not observed. ‘When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurance check results No major issue Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions. During the site visit, Consultant reviewed quality and no major non-conformance was found. Commercial Performance: Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, i.e performance with respect to clauses such as ~ guarantee / warranty, defects-liability, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) IRMA Technical Expert reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as ‘mentioned above and found that ULB has followed and maintained all above mentioned ~ licenses. Bank guarantee, insurance etc. and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with deduction of tax (as per Govt. rules) Contractor has not submitted Bank Guarantee thus PHED has been retained 10% amount from each RA bill as performance security Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact There is no any critical commercial terms and conditions between parties ‘Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters. Financial Performance: . Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project Total Funds received till this inspection is 29.03 Cr. Bifurcation of share of funds from various parties is not available at PHED office. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any). IRMA had verified utilization of funds by records. PHED received 22.96 Cr. under AMRUT and paid 22,89 Cr. for upto 10" RA bill. Contractor have submitted [1th and 12th RA bill Rs.8.73 Cr. Which is due for payment. Funds for Raod restoration is also paid to Nagar Parishad Bundi, and M/s Shivraj Contractor, (bundi) (0.935 Cr paid) and JVVNL, Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made. Such documents will include ~ Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, etc. IRMA Technical Expert reviewed documents related to claim. The total payment has been paid of | amount 22.89 Cr. till October 2020 The payment has been made after deductions of taxes and SD. As, per notification from state govt 50% of the SD has been released as per orders considering COVID-19 pandemic. If any discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During Documents review, no found any discrepancy in the above. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5%) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation, ‘At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects hi Financial disbursement may be streamlined and made faster.6 1g Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate, ‘Compliance to the statutory requirements Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. Environmental clearance not required, Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include healt and safety issues concerning workers at site. Health and safety measures are taken by the contractor adequately. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. It is observed the contractor has made available adequate health and sanitation arrangements at their site office, but the labour uses public facilities during the execution of works. All the workers (labour) are local labour and they retum to their houses after day’s work. There is no labour hhutment. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons There is no requirement of Resettlement and Rehabilitation. Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. Not applicable Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records. ‘No compensations Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. As of now, there is not any court Case.Site progress photos (Water supply) Bundi_21/10/2020 tS Jal | a iReporting Format for Water Supply Project II. Construction Stage (Oct. 2020) 1. Common Attributes: ‘A- General Details a, Name of State : Rajasthan b, Name of City : Chittorgarh ¢. Name of Project : “Re Organization Urban Water Supply Scheme Chittorgarh With 7 Years Operation & Maintenance including 1 Year defect liability period ie design (Selected Part),Build, Operate and Maintenance under AMRUTNIT No. 01/2017-18 (Tender ID 2017_PHCJA_65360_1), Estimated cost Rs. 5710.64 Lacs.) d, Project Code: RAJ-CHI-002,RAJ-CHI-006, €. Approved Project Cost in SAAP: Rs. SAAP-I (40 Cr.) & SAAP-III (15 Cr.) £. Project included in which SAAP i.e. W/II/MM: SAAP-I and SAAP-IIL g. Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details ie. SAAP-L, Il or IIL: Yes SAAP-I and SAAP-IIL h. Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 115 &132 i, Name of Reviewing Agency (IRMA): Srei infrastructure finance Ltd, JV with JPS Associate j. Date of Review : 28.10.2020 k, Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit: Mr. Sanjay Kumar |, Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal etc.): PHED, Chittorgarh. m. Key Concerned Officer (s) interacted during review: Mr. C.V. Singh (AEN,PHED) n, Number of visits already made for the project; 05, (This is 6th Visit). B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA a. Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 6th SLTC dt. 25.10.2016 b. Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 04.09.2015 & 28.10.2016 ©. Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RIP). If there is any delay please give reasons : NIT issued on dated 23.05.2017 d. Publication Details of NIT: 01/2017-18 e, Date of issue of Work Order: 11.12.2017 f, Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 11.12.2017 & Actual date of start of work: 20.12.2017h, Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s Lahoty and GA Infra JV i, Contractual Amount, Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Work Order Amount: Rs, 68.53 Cr. (Capital Cost Rs. 57.53 Cr. O&M Rs, 10.99 Cr.) 2. Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: Mile Stone Targeted For The ~ Period As Per plan % Rescheduled Milestone | Reasons | date based | Advise on Target [Achieved | Completed | for the on remedial Project Component _ Quantity, Qty. delay _|performance| measures Rising Main DI (Km) 2B 19.80 | 86.0% Required to Distribution Network a me HDPE & DI(Km) _ 134 134 | 120.0 | 89.55% for laying, pipes by the 2440_| 2440 | 2122 | 86.96% PHED. (Consumers PHED may Fixing House Water list not bbe advised to Meters 6000 6000 A718 78.63% _| provided provide the OHSR, Chanderiya | list of 600 KL 100% consumers ‘OHSR, Tilaknagar for meter 600 KL. 1 1 1 100% commections. ‘OHSR, Hospital 400 | sothat meter KL L 1 1 100% a ‘OHSR, Mahashpuram | palieg at 300 KL — | 1 1 100% 7 ‘OHSR , Shyamprashad 2 Mukharji Colony 300 s KL L 1 1 100% a ‘OHSR, Panchwati = 600 KL 4 1 0.85 85% is Delayed OHSR, Neelkhanth allotted Colony 600 KL i 0.50 50% _| the tand | OHSR, Gandhi nagar 400KL a 1 1 100% Fort (GSLR) ob 1 1 100% Prosress WR Gandhi Nagar for the 100 KL 1 1 1 100% _| Materials CWR Tilaknagar 175 KL 1 1 L 100% oO Delayed 7 CWR at Neelkhanth allotted [Colony 100KL | ot 1 0.75 75% | the tand Pump House Delayed ‘Neelkhanth Colony allotted 100 SOM 1 1 030 30% | the landPump House | Tilaknagar 100 SQM 1 100% Pump House Bundi Road 100 SQM 1 1 0.95 95% —- pending Pump House ‘due to Pandanpole 100 SQM. 1 1 0.95 95% electric ~ — Immediate Pump House Bagaliya connectio requited to 100 SOM 1 1 1__| _100% 7 finalise the Pump House om GandhiNagar Sec. No. Geo 4 100SQM 1 1 1 100% curtailment Boundary wall at 5 Timit up to locations | 1 1 100% | wi Master Control Center sanetion by at Padanpol 1 1 0.65 65% EIC/SE or Jen of it higher Pratapnagar 1 1 1 | 100% | Authority. Aen office at Shastri Nagar to L 1 100% | | _| Consumer Care center 3] : Site PHED may | at Segwa 1 i eS Dispute be advised to Consumer Care center (land not resolve at Chanderiya 1 1 o | _o% allotted) dispute Due PHED may revised be advised to Intake structure at drawing start the work Bherda | 1 0 0% | & design immediatel Note:- Immediate required (o finalise the revised BOQ as per cost curtailment limit up to A&F sanction by EICISE or higher Authority a Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of water supply system ete. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector: ‘As given above. Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs, IRMA consultant also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate, Photographs has been uploaded regularly. Quality Assurance Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports. Contractor has established a lab at site office (in Storage yard). Sieve Set, Slump Cone, verniar calipers, measuring devices, and weight machines etc. are available at the Lab, Concrete cube tests are conducted for every 7 days and 28 days for each lift of concrete in water retaining structures. PHED officers remain present at the time of compression test of cubes. Test results are recorded in the register at site. The relevant tests are done on a routine basis as per the provisions of the relevant Indian Standards. The cubes testing machine is not calibrated, Executing agency were advised to get the machine calibrated at earliest. Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for Cement, Steel, pipes. Material also got tested from 3rd party (CIPET-Jaipur, Sriram Labs- Delhi) Structural Design are vetted by Ve 1g College, Jodhpur Ko ERb. Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records IRMA found quality of construction materials used in the project as per standard. c. Ifany deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify During visit, no found any deviation against specifications as given in the DPR. d. When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurancel check results. There are no isstes related to quality. e. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions, During site visit, IRMA reviewed quality and not found any ease of non-conformance at site. 4, Commercial Performanes a. Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, ie. performance with respect to clauses such as — guarantee / warranty, defectsliablity, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that PHED has followed and maintained all above mentioned — licenses. Bank guarantee, insurance etc. and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with deduction of tax (as per Govt. rules) . BG No is 3188319BG0000406, for a value of Rs 3.00 Cr, valid upto 28.02.2021 b, Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact. ‘There is no critical commercial terms and conditions c. Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance, Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters. 5. Financial Performance: a, Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project Executive agency (PHED) is not liable to share in the funds. Gol and GoR is giving their share but the bifurcation of share is not available at PHED office. PHED has submitted U.C. of Rs. 38.13Cr. b. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any). ‘Complete funds have been utilized on the project. Total Rs. 38.13 Cr. utilized on the project c. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made, Such documents will include — Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank Invoices, Measurement Book are found OK. The payment has been made after deductions as per agreement, Upto 9th RA bill Rs, 36.26 Cr. has been paid to contractor and Rs.7.50 Cr. upto 12th RA bill which is already certified by PHED still pending to pay. conduct necessary tests to check the quality of the materials used.If any discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During documents review, no found any discrepancy in the above. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any Required to financial disbursement at the eat Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate Compliance to the statutory requirements Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. No required Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site, During visit at site, IRMA found that Contractor has arranged all necessary health and safety equipment’s at site. Contractor deploys new workers at site after conducting health and safety training and reviewing health and safety measure time to time, Adequate first aid facilities approved by a health authority have maintained and made available in every labor camp for the emergency treatment of injured persons. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. During visit at site, IRMA found that contractor has maintained standard of health and sanitation arrangements at camp site Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons ‘There is not any Resettlement and Rehabilitation. Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR, NA. Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records. No compensation paid. Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. Land Dispute may be resolved ASAP by PHED. Land is not available due various reasons (land Dispute, ASI clearance, unavailability of land) for some structures (Segwa, Chanderia). This land should be made available so the work of these structures may be started.Site Progress Photographs (28.10.2020) ri P ae Pump House- NeelkhanthOHSR- Neelkanth Colony OHSR- Panchwati Material- Neelkanth colony CWR- Neelkanth colonyReporting Format for Water Supply Project II. Commissioning, Trial Run and Testing Stage (Oct.2020) Common Attributes: A- General Details ) b) °) 4d) e) m) Name of Stat Rajasthan Name of City: Churu ‘Name of Project: Execution of the work of Re Organization Urban water Supply Scheme Churu with 7 year Operation & Maintenance including 01 year defect liability period i.e. design (Selected part), Build, Operate and Maintenance. Project Code: RAS/CHU/005 Approved Project Cost in SAAP: Rs, 20.79 Crs Project included in which SAAP i.e. VIVIN: SAAP-IIL Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details i.e. SAAP-I, If or IIL: No Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 76 ‘Name of Reviewing Agency(IRMA): SREI Infrastructure Finance Limited JV with JPS Associates Date of Review: 07.10.2020 Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit: Mr.Rajeev Dagla Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal etc.); PHED, Churu Key Concemed Officer (s) interacted during review: PHED AEn Mr. Majhar Ali, Amar Singh Contractor's Representative ‘Number of visits already made for the project: 04, this is 5" visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA a) b) °) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 6” SLTC dated 25.10.2016 Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 28.10.2016 Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (R&P). If there is any delay please give reasons: 15.03.2017Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as per the requirement 4d Publication Details of NIT: Could not traced °) Date of issue of Work Order: 02.06.2017 p Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 12.06.2017 2) Actual date of start of work: 11.06.2019 hy Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s Yadav Construction Company i) Contractual Amount, Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Work Order: Rs. 21.1 aes including © & M (difference Rs. 0.33 Cr). 2 Compliance to previous inspection. 1. Leakages observed in CWR (50 Lakh liters capacity) ~ Complied - Repaired 2. Leakages at OHSR DTO office - Complied - Repaired 3. Leakages at OHSR Collectorate - Complied - Repaired 3. Observations: Scada System is not fully functioning in absence of Internet, or other defects Lab established under AMRUT is not functional, Water testing records are to be followed up. 4. Provide comments on handing over of all documentation, “As Built” drawings, operational instructions and equipment manuals to the O&M team and list the same 1 [As built General Arrangement Drawings Yes 2 {As built Detailed Engineering Design Drawings Yes 3 [As built Drawings for Miscellaneous components Yes 4 [Test & Investigation Reports No 3 [Materials report Yes 6 [Third party certificates Yes 7 {0 & M Manual (Including equipment manuals) Yes 5. Provide comments on level of participation during testing by the O&M team. PHED staff Jen, Aené& Executive Engineer has participated during testing, 6. Report about the adequacy of training provided to the O/M team in terms of the following:10. i. [Level of staff trained Higher level [Middle Level (Skilled unior Level Plumbers) jumber of staff trained a @ 00 (Unskilled workers are higher as required) [Adequate / Not adequate Yes Yes Yes [Time Duration 4 @ NA Higher level staff Manager O&M Mr. Amar Singh is well experience and trained in the O&M of water supply and 2 Middle Level workers (skilled Plumbers) are also trained. Hired staff is well trained. But ‘number of skilled workers (2 Nos.) is not sufficient to handle O&M of 6000 Connections. Report about the Trial run / testing of the projects completed? ‘Trial run was successfully completed, PHED may be advised to regularly monitor of running and defects. Indicate the problems / performance level of the plants /machinery during trial run stage? No any problems occurred during trail run stage and performance level achieved as per prefixed milestone. If the performance level of the plants and machinery is not adequate and satisfactory, list the correction measure suggested? Plants and machinery provided are performing adequately. Provide details on the assessment of the O&M arrangement for the project, specifically of its adequacy, financial arrangement and sustainability Supplying water to 6200 nos. of urban houses, with 1 Hr per day. Canal water supply was interrupted 2 times (in last 6 months) affecting supply. It disturbed supply for 2 days. O&M of the water supply system is being done by main contractor executed the works. The payments to the contractor are done by PHED by its ‘own sources. Provide details on the expected outcomes from the projects and quantificati service level benchmarks. This project will increase the life style and living standards of more than 6000 families. However duration of supply hours is not as expected. And some constraint due to supply of water from canal, it need further rectifications to achieve its targets. in terms of achievement ofwuply 07.10.2020)Reporting Format for Water Supply Project IL. Construction Stage Oct. 2020 1, Common Attributes: A- General Details a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Dholpur. ¢) Name of Project: Execution of the work of Re Organization Urban water Supply Scheme Bharatpur with 7 year Operation & Maintenance including 01 year defect liability period Under AMRUT Mission (Package!) 4) Project Code: RAJ-DHA-001 & RAJ-DHA-003 ©) Approved Project Cost in SAAP: SAAP I: Rs. 30.00 Cr. & SAP II: Rs. 11.67 Cr. 1) Project included in which SAAP i. VII/III: SAAP 1 & SAAP IL 2) Whether the project falls in more than one SAP. If yes please provide details i.e. SAAP-I, II or Ill.: Yes (SAAP I & SAAP Il) h) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 131,95 i) Name of reviewing agency (IRMA);Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. JV with IPS Associates i) Date of review: 16.10.2020 k) Name of personnel of review agency making the site visit: Sanjay Kumar 1) Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal etc.): PHED, Dholpur m) Key Concerned Officer (s) interacted during revie' Ramawatar PHED : AEn. Mr Shiv kumar mudgal, Xen, Mr, n) Number of visits already made for the project: 05, this is 6" visit. B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 2" SLTC dt. 21.03.2016 b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 1* SHPSC dt. 04.09.2015 & 3rd SHPSC dt. 28.10.2016 ©) Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RIP). If there is any delay please give reasons: 20.02.2017Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as per the requirement d) Publication Details of NIT: Information could not traced ©) Date of issue of Work Order:11.12.2017 Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 21.12.2017 2) Actual date of start of work: 21.12.2017 h) Name of Contfactor/ Executing agency: M/s Lahoty buildcon Ltd. i) Contractual Amount, Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Work Order Amount: Rs, 47.00 Cr. (Capital Cost: Rs. 42.12 Cr., O&M Cost: Rs. 4.88 Cr.) Rs. 5 Cr. above than amount approved in SAAP. 2. Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: Wile Stone Targeted For] % | Project The Period AsPer lan | ilestone| "easonsfor |Rescheduled | Advise on component the Hate based on) remedial completed, 92l8Y—/ performance} measures Total | Target | Executed — - Quantity| Quantity | Quantity rater Supply with Rising Main 191.04 | 191.04 | 159.0 | 83.27% letwork(Km) ‘T.ESR (Ziroli - Campus) : : 035 | 35% | contractor has 2. ESR Bari Saipur 1 1 1 100% | not deployed Es _ manpower and [CWR.Ziroli Campus [1 i 00 0.0% "in sulfclent | Completion PP&ed UP the Pump House Ziroli | 00% | quantity. | seneduted. Mork progress Campus 1 1 oo | ‘Tate pnd complete aoe. T r } ot 100% | Delayed due to -2021 fhe balance Consumer Care Centre yes 1° | 34-03-2022 Lrork at the Boundary Wall - — periiest. Mital colony I t 1 a 1 1 1 100% fahatma nand Bagichi 1 0.05 | 5.0% , PHED may be advised to Domestic connectior| 11000 ) 11000 | 4399 | 12.01% speed up the (No. connection ‘a, Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the projeof aid quaii of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of wate iit lete. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector j* Ifany discrepancy is observed, while reviewing the project, the IRMA agency may suggest 11000 conection are included in the project & Installation work under progress b. Report on regular updating AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. IRMA consultant also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate. At present, there is no mechanism with PHED for monitoring of physical, financial progress. IRMA. advised to setup of mechanism for the same, PHED agreed for the same. 3. Quality Assurance a, Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports. ‘The Cube sample is taking from ready to cast material. There is lab established at construction site with site office. The aggregate, sand WBM Material test has being conducted at every 7 days and 28days at site lab in the presence of PHED representatives, Cube strength test has recorded in the register at site. IRMA Advised to conduct Cube tests from external laboratory also Structural Design are vetted by MNIT Engineering College, Jaipur. ‘The following tests have been done on a routine basis as per the provisions of the relevant IS Code, Gradation and specific gravity of coarse and fine aggregate to be used for concrete work, Moisture content in fine and course aggregates, bulking of sand of fine aggregate. Determination of fines and deleterious materials, organic impurities and light weight places in course and fine aggregate. Workability tests on concrete by means of slump cone. Determination of the crushing strength, absorption and efflorescence of bricks. Concrete cube crushing strength at 7 days and 28 days. Determination of flakiness index and crushing value for coarse aggregates. ‘Testing of cement (Physical and Chemical), as per IS 269 or IS 485, Tests on steel (Mild and High Tensile (Tor) as per IS 1786 to establish the Ultimate tensile strength, yield stress, percentage elongation and chemical composition. Tests for suitability of water for concrete work. Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for Cement, Steel, pipes (RCC, DWC & PVC-U) Precast manholes etc, b. Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records During site visit, IRMA found quality of construction materials used is as per standards IS codes (as complied in agreement), ©. [fany deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify During visit, no found any deviation against specifications as given in the DPR. 4. When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurance! check results. During site visit, conducted cube test at site lab and result got as per parameters. There are no issues related to quality. e. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions, _ During site visit, IRMA reviewed quality and no found of any case of non-conformance avgtish"? > 4. Commercial Performance: conduct necessary tests to check the quality of the materials used.a. Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, i.e. performance with respect to clauses such as - guarantee / warranty, defects-tiability, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses sch as mentioned above and found that ULB has followed and maintained all above mentioned — licenses. Bank guarantees, insurance ‘etc. and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with deduction of tax (as per Govt. rules) ‘As per agreement between contractor and ULB, Contractor has submitted Bank Guarantee. Details as given below BG No- 3188319BG00024of Rs.1.0 Cr.(State bank of India) against Security Deposit b. Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact. Incentive option may be explored for completion of the project before time by the contractor and implementing agency ©. Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance. Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters. 5. Financial Performan: a. Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project ULB has not been contributed their part till now. b. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements, Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any). Bank Statement was not available at PHED office. IRMA has verified utilization of funds and contractor payment by cheque book only. PHED received Rs.17.99 Cr. and utilized the same on project. c. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made, Such documents will include ~ Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, etc. IRMA reviewed documents related to claim. The total payment has been paid upto 11" RA bill of gross amount 17.43 Cr/- till date. Still Rs.2.22 Cr upto 13" RA bill is outstanding due to non-availability of fund. 4d. If any discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During documents review, no discrepancy found in the above. €. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. £. Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any Required to financial disbursement at the immediately. 8 Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management. Present system for project related matter is adequate. 6. Compliance to the statutory requirements a. Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agenci environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Mat project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. No environmental clearance required for the projectReport on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site, During visit at site, [RMA found that Contractor has arranged all necessary health and safety equipment’s at site. Contractor deploys new workers at site after conducting health and safety training and reviewing health and safety measure time to time. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. During visit at site, IRMA found that contractor has maintained standard of health and sanitation arrangements at camp site. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons The project is being executed on either road side. Therefore there is issue of Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. Due to no required of land acquisitions, there is no matter of resettlement and rehabilitation. Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records. No compensations Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. No court Cases are involved which can affect the physical progress of the projectSite Progress Photos ( Dhoulpur_Water Supply)Site Progress Photos ( Dhoulpur_Water Supply)Reporting Format for Water Supply Project IL, Construction Stage (Oct. 2020) 1, Common Attributes: A- General Details a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Gangapur City ©) Name of Project: Execution of the work of Re Organization Urban water Supply Scheme Gangapur City (District Sawai Madhopur) with 7 year Operation & Maintenance including 01 year defect liabitity period ie. design (Selected part), Build, Operate and Maintain d) Project Code: RAJ-GAN-003 & RAJ-GAN-006 e) Approved Project Cost in SAAP: SAAP I: Rs, 40.00 Cr. & SAAP II: Rs. 19.81 Cr, Project included in which SAP ie. VIV/IU: SAAP I & SAAP IL 2) Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details ie. SAAP-I, Il or IIL: Yes (SAP 1 & SAP I!) h) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 33, 93 i) Name of reviewing agency (IRMA): Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. JV with JPS Associates i) Date of review: 14/10/2020 k)_ Name of personnel of review agency making the site visit: Mr.Sanjay Kumar 1) Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal ete.): PHED, Gangapur City m) Key Concemed Officer (s) interacted during review: Ex. En.: Mr. Ramkesh Meena, Mr. Dheeraj Meena JE PHED & Mr. Babulal contractor representative. ‘n) Number of visits already made for the project: 05, this is 6" visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA. a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 2" SLTC dt. 21.03.2016 b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: I SHPSC dt, 04.09.2015 & 2 SHPSC dt. 11.05.2016 ©) Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RP). If there is any delay please give reasons: NIT issued dt. 10.07.2017Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as per the requirement 4) Publication Details of NIT:10.07.2017 (Times of India. 10.07.17, Dainik Bhaskar 10.07.17) €) Date of issue of Work Order: 11.12.2017 £) Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 21.12.2017 8) Actual date of start of work: 27.12.2017 |h) Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s Devendra Construction Company i) Contractual Amount. Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Work Order Amount: Rs. 77.79 Cr. (Capital Cost: Rs. 69.54 Cr., O&M Cost: Rs. 8.25 Cr.) 2. Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: Mile Stone Targeted | Rescheduled] 4 4.5, sk Project ne % Reasons for /REsenraule) Advise on No. Component The Period As Per | {uilestone bed on bicobomed 7 JCompleted) delay measures plan performance ~ | Bog | Target | Executed Quantity | Quantity) Quantity 1 | Water Supply Network(Km) | 1.1_| Rising Main (Km) ~_ [35.60 | 35.60 | 29.0 81.46% 12 _| Distribution (Km) 2540 | 2540 [150.0 | 59.0% 2 | OHSR’s 1, Work progress As the huge - — slow due to amount Rs, 21 }oMge enon L20OKE 1 1 090 | 90% | delayed payment 16.94 Cr OHSR ° rake - = pending sinec WRD campus rong time so 22 | (ldtecinGov.cotege | 1 1 0.90 | 90% | 2. Location of NL scteastie har 450 KL OHSR) CSR ot shown his Panchayat Samiti 1000 KL | — incapability t 23. | onsR 1 ' 1 too | continue worl 3a Chult Nala PS. TOOOKL i 1 im 90% | fesidents claims | 19/122020 | without OHSR his land so court Payment. Mirjapur school T200KL | stay on the land) js 25 | OHSR (old location Soni 1 1 0.60 | 60% | Work delayed Required to bagichi) | J due to monsoon. disburse the 26 | Muslim Basti S0KL OHSR | 1 1 090 | 90% payment ~ | T50OKL OFSR at Delayed to immediately. 22 | RICO Cs location is 1 1 0.90 | 90% _ | shortage of fund. Saloda Mod ) | 3 |cwrs 2 2 | 090 | 90% Chulli Nala Head Works . 3.1 | TtooKL eWR) 1 | 090 | 090 | 90% pes Kes rt Pe pee fw EX eo 4 %S| SCADA & Instrumentation | 1 1 30 30% 6 | Consumer meter and house fon meer 20000 | 20000 | 1500 13% ‘a. Report on progress against year wise targels set for expected outcomes from the project and ‘quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of water supply system etc. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector 100% Population is covered and 20000 house connections will be connected b, Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. IRMA consultant also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate, At present, there is no mechanism with PHED for monitoring of physical, financial progress, project outcomes. IRMA advised to setup of mechanism for the same. Contractor representative install app in their mobile and uploaded the photo in presence of IRMA. 3. Quality Assurance a. Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports. Contractor has not established lab at site. Contractor conducted cube tests from external laboratory. Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for pipe, Cement, Steel, etc. MSME, Jaipur (govt. approved) is inspecting stee! pipes & cube tests National Test House & CIPET, Jaipur (Govt. approved) is inspecting of HDPE & DI pipes b. Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records During site visit, found quality of construction materials used as per standard. ©. Ifany deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify No found any deviation against specifications as given in the DPR. 4. When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurance! check results. There are no issues related to quality. e. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions. During site visit, IRMA reviewed quality and no found of any case of non-conformance at site, 4. Commercial Performance: a Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, ie. performance with respect to clauses such as — guarantee / warranty, defects-liability, licenses, bank ‘guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that ULB has followed and maintained all above mentioned ~ licenses. Bank guarantee, insurance etc, and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with deduction of tax (as per Govt. rules) Contractor has not submitted BG so PHED deducted 10% from each RA bills.b. Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact ‘There is no any critical commercial terms and conditions c. Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters. 5. Financial Performance: a. Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project Fund contribution details are not available at gangapur PHED office. b. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any). Bank Statement was not available at PHED office. PHED received Rs.20.77 Cr. for water supply under AMRUT and utilised the same on the project. c. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made. Such documents will include — Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, etc. IRMA reviewed documents related to claim. Rs.20.42 Cr. upto RA bill 6* has been paid to contractor. The contractor has submitted 7” & 8" RA bill of Rs.16.44 Cr, but paid due to non-availability of fund. PHED has appointed another contractor for road restoration work, Rs.34.0 lac. of 1" RA bill has been paid for road restoration and Rs. 1.0 Cr. of 2 &3” RA bill pending to pay. 4. If any discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During Documents review, no found any discrepancy in the above. €, If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. £. Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate. 6. Compliance to the statutory requirements a. Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. No environmental clearance required b. Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site. During visit, IRMA found that Contractor has arranged all necessary health and safety equipment’s at site, ¢. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. During visit at site, IRMA found that contractor has arrangements project camp at site for their staff. d. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons There is no issue of Resettlement and Rehabilitation.e. Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. Not applicable Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records. ‘No compensations Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. As of now, No court Cases,Site Progress Photos (Water Supply, Gangapur) —14/10/2020cI eS iT |Reporting Format for Water Supply Project Il. Construction Stage (Oct. 2020) 1, Common Attributes: A- General Details a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: \daun City ©) Name of Project: Execution of the work of Re Organization Urban water Supply Scheme Hindaun 7 year Operation & Maintenance including 01 year defect liability period under AMRUT mission (Package-01) d) Project Code: RAJ-HIN-004 €) Approved Project Cost in SAAP: Rs. 20.57 Cr. £) Project included in which SAAP i.e. I/IVIIL: SAAP IIT 8) Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details i.e, SAAP-I, I] or MIL: No h) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 74 i) Name of reviewing agency (IRMA): Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd, JV with JPS Associates i) Date of review: 13/10/2020 k)_ Name of personnel of review agency making the site visit: Mr. Sanjay Kumar 1) Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal ec.): PHED, Hindaun City m) Key Concerned Officer (8) interacted during review: Ex.Bn Ravindra Meena AEn. Mr. Sagare Singh Meena (PHED) n) Number of visits already made for the project: 05, this is 6” visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, devi on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA. mn, its impact a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 6" SLTC dt. 25.10.2016 'b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 3"! SHPSC dt. 28.10.2016 ©) Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (R¢P). If there is any delay please give reasons: 31.05.2017Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as per the requirement 4) Publication Details of NIT: Information is not available at PHED office, Hindaun e) Date of issue of Work Order: 11.12.2017 f) Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 21.12.2017 £) Actual date of start of work: 21.12.2017 h) Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s $.B. Enterprises i) Contractual Amount, Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Work Order Amount: Rs. 24.32 Cr; (Capital cost: Rs 20.57 Cr; 7 yrs. O&M cost: Rs. 3.75 Cr.) 2, Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: Mille Stone Targeted Project Por % | Reasonsfor | Rescheduled | Advise on Component | The Period As Per Milestone the | date based on | remedial e plan completed | delay —_| performance | measures Total | Target | Executed | Quantity | Quantity | Quantity Water Supply - networdtm) | 223. | 223 31s | 97.52% | ork progress \ lowdue to | Rising Main (Km) | 1346 | 1346 | 1214 | a9.0% Peavey ayment to PHED may be Pipe line testing 32.3 18 315 aa.2a% _precuting advised to CWR(Prahlad | ~peency: speed the Konak 1 1 1 100% work sothat und project can ee 1 1 100% closed at the Howse) earliest. Tube Well 2 12 2 100% Rescheduled | As mentioned As, existing | date of in previous ~DHSR stillin | completion | report, PHED existing CR, 1 54 1 60% —pperationso | 30/11/2020 | may advised Pehiad Kund ermission not to resolve the “2. Dismantling of | ranted to Mabu village existing Out of | lemolish by matters and Service OHSR at 2 2 0 0.0% — Pepartment. provide Old city & Mohan | necessary NOC Nagar for pipe laying. 3.solar energy | > based bore well water pumping | 43nos. | 43 33 76.74% system in existing bore wells 4, Master control Centre f 0.90 50.61 1 0.95 95.0% centre 6 Service road for Proposed tube well at 3km 3 03 toy ue to proper | Pataparpura, layout | Mahu and Teli | Panseri (km) [7 Rehabilitation of existing pump house building, office building, staff quarters, store buildings and residential quarters. B.instrumentation and SCADA , 1 0 o0% 9, House service and connection AMR Multi-jet class: B magnetically coupled water meter installing & commissioning 5. Consumer Care 1 1 0.95 95.0% | 18000 | 18000 | 12783 | 71.02% a. Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of water supply system etc. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector 18000 house connections will be connected b, Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. IRMA consultant also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate. ‘At present, there is no mechanism with PHED for monitoring of physical, financial progress, project outcomes. IRMA advised to setup of mechanism for the same. Contractor representative install app in their mobile and uploaded the photo in presence of IRMA. Quality Assurance a. Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports. Contractor conducted cube tests from external laboratory. Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for Cement, Steel, ete. Alex testing lab, Jaipur (govt. approved) is inspecting steel pipes & cube tests, Sri Ram institute of research, Noida is inspecting of HDPE & DI pipes b. Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records During site visit, found quality of construction materials used as per standard, 5 c, Ifany deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify KE ‘No found any deviation against specifications as given in the DPR. Syd, When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurance! check results. There are no issues related to quality ©. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions. During site ist, IRMA reviewed quality and no found of any case of non-conformance at site, Commercial Performance: a, Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, i.e. performance with respect to clauses such as — guarantee / warranty, defects-liability, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that ULB has followed and maintained all above mentioned — licenses. Bank guarantee, insurance etc. and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with deduction of tax (as per Govt. rules) Contractor has not submitted BG so PHED deducted 10% from each RA bills. b. Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact. There is no critical commercial terms and conditions ¢. Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters. 5. Financial Performance: a, Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project Al the counter parties contributed their fund parts. b. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any). Bank Statement was not available at PHED office. They showed us only cheque book and IRMA had verified utilization of funds by cheque book only. PHED received Rs.11.02 Cr under AMRUT for this project and utilized the same on project. ¢. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made. Such documents will include ~ Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, etc, IRMA reviewed documents related to claim. The total payment has been paid upto 4™ RA bill of gross amount 11.02 Cr. till date. The payment has been made after deductions as per agreement. As the contractor has been executed the quantity of 15.40 Cr. till now. ‘Therefore Rs.4.38 Cr. still pending due to shortage of fund, 4. If any discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? + [fany discrepancy is observed, while reviewing the project, the IRMA ageney may sugges) conduct necessary tests to check the quality of the materials used,During Documents review, no found any discrepancy in the above. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail, Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any Contractor has been executed more quantity after 5" RA bill therefore required to financial disbursement at the earliest. Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate. 6. Compliance to the statutory requirements Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. ‘No environmental clearance required Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site. During visit at camp site, IRMA found that Contractor has arranged all necessary health and safety equipment’s at site. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. During visit at site, IRMA found that contractor has arrangements project camp at site for their staff. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons There is no issue of Resettlement and Rehabilitat Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. Not applicable Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records. No compensations Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. As of now, No court Cases,Site Progress Photos (Water Supply, Hindaun)_13/10/2020Reporting Format for Water Supply Project II. Construction Stage (Oct. 2020) 1. Common Attributes: A> General Details a. Name of State : Rajasthan b. Name of City : Udaipur c. Name of Project: Integrated Infrastructure package for ABD area of Udaipur City with 01 Year defect liability period and and O&M for 10 years. d. Project Code: RAJ-UDA-006 s. 30.00 Cr. €. Approved Project Cost in SAAP: £, Project included in which SAP i.e. I/VIII: SAAP- IIL g. Whether the project falls in more than one SAP. If yes please provide details i.e. SAAP-I, II or IIL: No fh. Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 118 i, Name of Reviewing Agency (IRMA): Srei infrastructure finance LTd. JV with JP S associate J. Date of Review : 29.10.2020 k. Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit: Mr. Sanjay Kumar 1. Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal etc.): Udaipur Smart City Ltd, m. Key Concerned Officer (s) interacted during review: Mr. Anwar Zamal PMC-EPTISA. ‘n, Number of visits already made for the project; 05, this is 6° visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 8" SLTC dt, 27.01.2017 b. Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 28.10.2016 ©. Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RP), If there is any delay please give reasons : d. Publication Details of NIT: Could not traced e. Date of issue of Work Order: 19.04.2018 £. Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 26.04.2018 g. Actual date of start of work: 26.04.2018 h, Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s L & T Ltd.i, Contractual Amount. Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Work Order Amount: Rs, 537.03 Cr. Integrated contract of all infrastructure works, including Water supply. Water supply works are of Rs 62 Cr. 2. Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs Total Water supply portion allotted to contractor is Rs. 62.0 Cr. And funded under AMRUT is Rs 30 Cr. So proportionately 50% of the all works are considered for milestones and achievement. Mile Stone - . ‘Targeted For The ; Reasons for the | Rescheduled | Advise on Project Period As Per plan | Achieved |. .% delay date based on | remedial Component Quantity | Milestone performance | measures Total | Target | Quantity | Completed | (Quantity| Quantity L Water Supply Stipulated time of NetworkDI | 78 | 48.4 455 58% start of (Km) construction work at site was September 2018, Rising Main DI 7 and work started (Km) a) " 82% | on time. But out oe of six months of construction | Feeder Main DI period passed | (KM | 967 | 32 ll 1% | ee niately 2 — ‘months was ivieod | | delayed due to pee up the i i Elections and 7 | Pipeline testing | 78 | 423 376 48% | Fesivals (City | 18.09.2021 work | mayor instructed vet ainy sothat time [wea et, cae MLD at 1 075 0.63 63% luring festive) recovered Machbala Magra | | WTP construction ‘was stopped due Raw water to forest Pump at Dudh | 1 o4 02 20% clearance. Now Talal Forest clearance is granted. Work GSLR 5.1 ML at is in progress Machhala Magra |! ad 0.83 = Work progress : a |__| | slow due to House ron2s'| essa lll 2204 3gy% | Corona Pandemic. connection ‘a. Report on progress year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of water supply system etc. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector: As given above. b. Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs, IRMA consultant also has to upload mAMRUT.3. Quality Assurance Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports. Contractor has established a lab at W'TP Site, Sieve Set, Slump Cone, verniar calipers, measuring devices, ‘and weight machines ete are available at the Lab. Concrete cube tests are conducted for every 7 days and 28 days for each lift of concrete in water retaining and other RCC structures. Tests are conducted in the presence of PMC and USCL officers. Test results are recorded in set formats. The relevant tests are done on a routine basis as per the provisions of the relevant Indian Standards. Calibration of various equipments was checked and found OK. Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for Cement, Steel, pipes. Structural Design is vetted by IIT-Chennai, Hydraulic design is vetted by PMC and PHED. b. Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records Quality of construction materials used in the project is satisfactory. cc. Ifany deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify No deviation against Specifications given in DPR are observed.. d, When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of mat prevail on quality assurance! check results. There ate no major issues related to quality Is used, IRMA agency may ©. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions. During site visit, IRMA reviewed quality and not found any case of non-conformanee at site. 4, Commercial Performance: a. Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, ie. performance with respect to clauses such as — guarantee / warranty, defects-liability, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) Contractor is maintaining all required licenses, bank guarantee, insurance required as per the agreement and statutory law. b, Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact. ‘There is no critical commercial condition c. Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance. Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters, 5. Financial Performance: a, Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project No funds in this head are received funds of Smart City Projects are being utilized for the payment to contractor. b. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements..Also.state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any). Nothing has been contributed under AMRUT fund. —S e/ ‘Many discrepancy is observed, while reviewing the project, the IRMA agency nn onde the PEA to conduct necessary tests to check the quality of the materials used,Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made. Such documents will include ~ Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, etc. IRMA reviewed documents related to claim. Fund under Smart city utilised on the project. Invoices, Measurement Book are found OK. The payment has been made after deductions as per agreement. Ifany discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During documents review, no found any discrepancy in the above. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any As of now, nothing has been disbursed under AMRUT mission so immediate required to disburse the fund. Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate. Compliance to the statutory requirements Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry, Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site. During visit at site, IRMA found that Contractor has arranged all necessary health and safety equipment’s at site. Contractor deploys new workers at site after conducting health and safety training and reviewing health and safety measure time to time, Adequate first aid facilities approved by a health authority have maintained and made available in every labor camp for the emergency treatment of injured persons. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. During visit at site, IRMA found that contractor has maintained standard of health and sanitation arrangements at camp site. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons ‘There is not any Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. NA. Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records. ‘No compensation paid. Report on court eases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. No court case.Site Photographs (29.10.2020)Reporting Format for Water supply project Il. Construction Stage (October 2020) Common Attributes: A> General Details a) b) °) d 8) hy i) dD &) » m) ny ‘Name of State: Rajasthan Name of City: Kota Name of Project: Work of reorganization of Urban Water Supply Scheme (UWSS) Kota with 07 years operation and maintenance including 01 year defect liability period i.e. design (selected part), build, operate and maintenance under AMRUT, against Chief Engineer (Urban & NRW), Rajasthan, Jaipur office Project Code: RAJ-KOT-001 & RAJ-KOT-004 Approved Project Cost in SAAP: 60.25 + 10.0 = 70.25 Cr. Project included in which SAAP i.e, VIM/IIk: SAP ~ Il & SAAP — III Whether the project falls in more than one SAP. If yes please provide details ie. SAAP-I, Il or IIL: Yes, SAP: - 60,25Cr. & SAAP:lII ~ 10.00 Cr. Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 16 & 95 Name of Reviewing Agency (IRMA): Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. JV with JPS Associates Date of Review: 19/10/2020 Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit -Rajeev Dagla Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal etc.): PHED, Kota Key Concerned Officer (s) interacted during review: Mr. Bharat Bhushan Pinjlani ExEn-PHED, Dikshant Mittal JEn PHED . Number of visits already made for the project: 5", this is 6" visit. B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact a) b) °) ‘on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA. Date of Appraisal of DPR by STC: 3rd SLTC on 25.04.2016 & 6th SLTC on 25.10.2016 Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 11.05.2016 & 28.10.2016 Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (R{P). If there is any delay please give reasons: 01/17-18, 23.06.2017and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as 4) Publication Details of NIT: Could not traced ©) Date of issue of Work Order: 06.12.2017 1) Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 15.12.2017 g) Actual date of start of work: 06.12.2017 h) Scheduled date of Completion : 14.12.2019 i) Actual Date of Completion : in progress i) Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s Dara Engineering & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Jodhpur k) Contractual Amount. Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAP: Capital Cost: 81.98 Cr., O&M Cost: 8.51 Cr., Total Cost: 90.49 Cr. But A&F 7.25Cr. , TS 75.41 Cr (TC-641 dated 30.06.2016). 2. Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: SI | Project Millstone Targeted for the Milestone | Reason for [Rescheduled | Advice on no. | Component period as per plan Completed | delay late based | remedial a measures performance BOQ | Target | Executed Quy. Qy. | Qty. aa 1.Non | PHED may be Distribution | 187.65 | 187.65 | 159.6 | 78.88% | | | advised to ‘Network (Km) Supplied availability speed up the urs of Rand ‘work sothat Executed 2, COvID balance work Hydro testing | 187.65 | 187.65 | 145 [77% |3-Area | 15.12.2020 | oe of Distribution submerged completed | network n chambal within ~ | Road 187.65 | 187.65 | 135, 2% rived Flood rescheduled Restoration in kota date. Water Meters | 56135 | 35600 | 18048 | 51% a (Revised -35600) Connections | 56669 [30000 | 13580 | 45% - (Revised -30000) ‘a, Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of water supply system ete. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector Water Meter Connection- 20600 will provided b. Report on regular updating AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. IRMA Technical Expert also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate. Presently progress is not being uploaded on AMRUT portal, IRMA Consultant is not able to are update the progress, not authorized to do so 3. Quality Assurance a. Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality a spel. vel Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports. © Contractor has established a lab at site office (in Storage yard). Sieve Set, Slump Con § calipers, measuring devices, and weight machines ete are available at the Lab. PHED of4 present at the time of compression test of cubes. Cube strength test has recorded in the register at site The relevant tests are done on a routine basis as per the provisions of the relevant Indian Standards; Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for Cement, Steel, pipes etc. but not found any test report of water meter as per BOQ nomenclature. Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records Quality of Cement, Pipes, aggregate, and concrete ete. is found satisfactory and as.per standard. And testing of the same is being maintained as per DPR. MDPE pipes are open to sunlight, contractor was advised to completely cover the MDPE pipes from sunlight, and contractor complied to the issues promptly. If any deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify ‘No deviation against specification is observed. When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurance check results, There is no issue of the quality of materials used. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions No Case ‘Commereial Performance: Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, i. performance with respect to clauses such as - guarantee / warranty, defects—liability, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, ete. (List the details) IRMA Technical Expert reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that ULB has followed and maintained all above mentioned — licenses. Bank guarantee, insurance etc, and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with deduction of tax and security deposit contractor has not submitted Bank Guarantee. Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact There is no any critical commercial terms and conditions between partes. Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters. 5, Financial Performance: Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project ‘The Total Funds received for the project is Rs 40.14 Cr. Out of which 40.11 has been paid to contractor. 3 lakh balance is available with PHED kota. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any). 100% has been utilized for the project. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made, Such documents will include — Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, ete. Security of @10% is being kept as BG and deduction from bill. BG is issued by Kotak Mahindra Bank, 02781GP200012817, Dated 5 June 2020, valid upto 3 June 2021. for value 2.5 Cr, Ket 5If any discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During documents review, no found any discrepancy in the above. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. Initial egst of the project was 81.98 Cr it is now revised to 68.26 Cr. resulting in 16.7 % reduction in project cost. Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any Financial disbursement may be streamlined and made faster for smooth running of the project. Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management, Compliance to the statutory requirements Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site. Health and safety measures are taken by the contractor adequately. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at camp: observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. Its observed the contractor has made available adequate health and sanitation arrangements at th site office, but the labour uses public facilities during the execution of works. Alll the workers (labour) are local labour and they return to their houses after day's work. There is no labour hutment. by visual Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons. No Resettlement and Rehabilitation Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. ‘Not applicable Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records. ‘No compensations Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. As of now, there is not any court Case.Site progress photos (Water supply) Kota _ 10/10/2020 ; osReporting Format for Water supply project M1, Construction Stage (October 2020) 1, Common Attributes: AS Seneral Details, a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Kota-II ©) Name of Project: Water Supply Project (15 works)-II 4) Project Code: RAI-KOT-007 ©) Approved Project Cost in SAP: 49.15 Cr. 1) Project included in which SAP i.e. VV/II: SAAP — IIT 2) Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details ie. SAAP-I, Il or TL: NIA h) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 44 i) Name of Reviewing Agency (IRMA): Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. JV with JPS Associates i) “Date of Review: 19/10/2020 k)_Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit : Mr. Rajeev Dagla }) Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal etc.): PHED, Kota m) Key Concemed Officer (s) interacted during review: Mr. Bharat Bhushan Pinjlani ExEn-PHED, | Dikshant Mittal JEn PHED. n) Number of visits already made for the project: Nil, this is Ist visit. B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: N/A 'b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 7" SHPSC dt. 20.03.2020 c) Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (R¢P). If there is any delay please give reasons: 27.12.2019 (for 2 works), 01.02.2020 (for 12 works) & 29.07.2020 (for 1 work)Note: Minist per the requir of Housing nt Sr.) Name of the work sation Date of issue Actua! G No Detailsof ofWork of start of Executing azeney Amount Ni Drader work (in Lac.) } | Procurement, Laying & | S0/19-20, | 19.02.2020 24/02/20 M/S Gulab Chand 111.82 jointing of pipe line for D.27/1219 Kumawat RANPUR Residential scheme from offake point to proposed — water supply campus at Ranpwr. Kota | 2 | Replacement of pipe line at | 5019-20 | 27.02.2020 | 06/03/20 | M/S Gulab Chand | 337.42 various places of Kota city | D1.27/12/19 Kumawat including Chourahas/Rotaries etc. kota 3 | Procurement, laying | 56/19-20 | 02.03.2020 | 02/05/20 /S Gulab Chand jointing of distribution | Dt. 1/2/20 Kumawat pipe — lineatMukundraVihar residential Scheme kota, | 4 | Construction of OHSR & | 56/19-20 | 02.03.2020 | 18/05/20 | M/S Gulab Chand | 70.14 CWR including providing, | Dt. 1/2/20 Kumawat laying , Jointing & testing of pipe line at RamanandCharya Residential Scheme, kota 5 | Development of water | 56/19-20 | 03.03.2020 | 3/5/20 ‘MIS Gulab Chand | 112.36 supply Scheme for | Dt. 1/2/20 Kumawat MukundraVihar — Extension Residential Housing, Scheme, kota rocurement, Laying & | 619-20 | 11.03.2020 | 11/5/20 | M/S Maheshwari | 275.97 jointing of (Distribution) | Dt. 1/2/20 Cont. pipe line at | DevnarayanYojna (Cattle colony) Kota 7 | Construction of OHS, | 56/19-20 | 06.03.2020 | 29/6/20 | M/S Gulab Chand | 226.22 CWRJ-2 Type qtr, Pump | Dt. 1/2/20 Kumawat house and Procurement, Laying & Jointing of Rising Main Pipe line at Devnarayan Yojna (Cattle Colony) kota 8 | Development of water 56/19-20 | 06.03.2020 | 26/4/20 | M/S Gulab Chand | 210.47 supply Scheme for Ranpur | Dt. 1/2/20 Kumawat Residential housing Scheme Kota9 Dewan of Wine 7 z MSG, Supply Sekerse for Lakhawa Ds 1/22 Keumawa 10 Development “of — Water | 56/19-20 06.03.2020 264/20) MVS Gulab Chand Supply Scheme for | Di. 1/2/20 Kumawat Mukundravihar residential | i _ scheme kota - [ | | [TT | Development of water | 56/19-20 | 06.03.2020 | 9/5/20 | M/S Gulab Chand | 234,82 scheme for GirirajPuram | Dt. 1/2/20 | Kumawat residential Housing Scheme, | |__| kota 12 | Const. of CWR, F-2 type qtr. | 56/19-20 | 06.03.2020 | 26/4/20 | M/S Gulab Chand | 178.36 and Pump — house & | Dt. 1/2/20 Kumawat procurement, Laying & jointing of Rising main pipe line for rajiv Gandhi nagar | special water supply scheme, | | kota. | 13 | Development of water 56/19-20 | 18.05.2020 | 14/7/20 | M/S Gulab Chand | 1057.37 supply scheme for Dt. 1/2/20 Kumawat mohanlalSukhadiya | Residential Housing | | Scheme, kota 14 | Construction of OHSR & | 56/19-20 | 11.03.2020 | 29/4/20 | MIS Gulab Chand [316.58 Procurement, Laying & Dt. 1/2/20 Kumawat Jointing of pipe line at Rajiv Gandhi Nagar Special | Scheme kota . 15 | Procurement, laying, 1820-21 | 28/9720 [3/10/20 | M/S Ajay Cont. | 268.51 Jointing & commissioning of | Dt.29/07/20 Pipe line at various assembly area of kota city.(ARC) 2. Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs Listas indicated below. Sl | Project Millstone Targeted for the period as fo ~ | Reason for Rescheduled | Advice on tno. | Component | per plan ilestone | delay ate based on | remedial “ompleted ____performance | measures BOQ [Target | Executed Qty. Qty. Qty. 1. | Procurement, Laying & jointing of pipe line for RANPUR Residential scheme from off | take point to proposed water supply campus at Ranpur. Kota Pipe line (m) | 2361 | 2361 2361 100 - - 2__| Replacement of pipe line at various places of Kota city including Chourahas/Rotaries etc, Kota | Pipe Line | 4730 4730 3763 80 = - (im) 3 | Procurement, laying & jointing of distribution pipe line at Mukundra Vihar residential Scheme kota. Pipe Line | 8619.80 | 8619.80 8619.80, 100 = = (om) - 4 | Construction of OHSR & CWR including providing, laying , Jointing & testi, at RamanandCharya Residential Scheme, kota pipe line (m) | 2200 2200 1436 65.27 eS OHSR 250KL | 1 T 100 -CWR (00 KI 00 5" Development of water supply Scheme for MukundraVihar Extension Residential Housing Scheme. kota __ Pipe Line | $317 | $317 314780 30.2 (m) | | OHSR 1 05 5 Delayed UIT may be 175 KL | due to advised to Lt I | Covid -19 speed the CWR 1 to 0s 5 work. | 250 KL. | | 6 | Procurement, Laying & jointing of (Distribution) pipe line at Devnarayan Yojna (Cattle colony) Kota - Pipe Line | 16661 [ 16661. [0 0 = - UIT may be (am) advised to start the work | __| immediately. 7 | Construction of OHSR, CWR.J-2 Type qtr, Pump house and Procurement, Laying & Jointing of Rising Main Pipe line at DevnarayanYojna (Cattle Colony) kota Pipe Line [3500 | 3500 2890 8257 (m) L Delayed UIT may be OHSR i i 375% [375 | dueto advised to 1250 KL Covid -19 speed the = work CWR i 1 | 90% 90 300 KL | 8 | Development of water supply Scheme for Ranpur Residential housing ‘Scheme Kota Pipe Line [149 149 450 3 (m) UIT may be ‘OHSR 1 1 037 375 advised to 2000 KL speed the work. WR GOO [7 1 90 90 KL | 9° | Development of Water Supply Scheme for Lakhawa Residential Housing ‘Scheme Scheme, kota Pipe Line | 9081 | 9081 92790 [76.29 | - = (m) OHSR 1 1 075 5 - ‘ UIT may be 400 KL advised to speed the CWR 1 1 H 100 ‘|= > work. 200 KL 10 | Development of Water Supply Scheme for Mukundra vihar residential | scheme kota = Pipe Line [5000 | 5000 3827 76.15 | - (a) | ‘OHSR 1 1 1 100 |- = a 900 KL. =630 KL 1] Development of water scheme fy Girira/Pararn residensiai Housing Scheme. kota ‘Pipe Line | 9396 9396 7612 81.0 = . om) | | TOHSR350 1 T 05 5 7 UIT maybe KL | __ advised to cw i 1 0s 5 E 3 speed the KL | work. 12 | Const. of CWR, J-2 type qtr. and Pump house & procurement, Laying & | Jointing of Rising main pipe line for rajiv Gandhi nagar special water supply scheme, kota - [Pipe Line [3080 3080] 1804 [5857] - (m) _ | CWR 1 iD [0.90 90 - . | 550 KL, | | 13 | Development of water supply scheme for mohanlal Sukhadiya Residential Housing Scheme, kota Pipe Line |39700 [39700 | 30059 757 |= = UIT may be (m) | _| advised to OHSR 1 I on 25 |- - speed the 2000 KL work. CWR 1 1 [90 90 - 7 650 KL 14 | Construction of ONSR & Procurement, Laying & Jointing of pipe line at Rajiv Gandhi Nagar Special Scheme kota | Pipe — Line | 8355 8355 6914.60 82.75 |. - |__| am UIT may be OHSR T 1 037 37 ? < advised to 200 KL speed the 15 | Procurement, laying, Jointing & commissioning of Pipe line at various work. assembly area of kota city (ARC) Pipe Line [2670 | 2670 149 538 | = (m) | a, Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of water supply system ete. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector b. Report on regular updating AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Anéroid) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. IRMA Technical Expert also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate. No photos is being uploading 3. Quality Assurance Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports. Contractor has established a lab at site office (in Storage yard). Sieve Set, suns calipers, measuring devices, and weight machines etc are available at the Lab. present at the time of compression test of eubes, Cube strength test has recoded in.5 mi, Steel, pipes ete. but not found any test Observe and repo on the quality of eonsirt ed in the project and ascertain trons the records Quality of Cement, Pipes, aggreuste, lesting of the same is being maintained, nnd concrete ete. is found satisfactory and as per standard. And Many deviation against No deviation ecification as given in the DPR, please specify When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurance check results ‘There is no issue of the quality of materials used. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions. No Case ‘Commercial Performance: Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, ic. performance with respect to clauses such as — guarantee / warranty, defects-liability, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) ‘The Contractor has not been submitted BG, so UIT has been deducted 10% SD from RA bills. Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has ‘an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact ‘There is no any critical commercial terms and conditions between parties. ‘Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters. Financial Performance: Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project ‘There is no fund received from GOI, GOR, UIT has expensed fund from their own part Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements, Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any). 100% has been utilized for the project. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made. Such documents will include — Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, ete. IRMA reviewed Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements and found satisfactory. UIT has paid 18.57 Cr. to the contractors, If any discrepaney in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During documents review, no found any discrepaney in the above. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail, Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. Lo No variation as on date. %dia meavares to expedite the Snunelat disvursemen: for sanctioned Projects #f any Fonancial disbursement may be streaaslined and made Easter for smooth running of the proiect Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Compliance to the statutory requirements Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. No environmental clearance required Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at sit. Health and safety measures are taken by the contractor adequately. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. It is observed the contractor has made available adequate health and sanitation arrangements at their site office, but the labour uses public facilities during the execution of works. All the workers (labour) are local labour and they return to their houses after day’s work. There is no labour hutment. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons, No Resettlement and Rehabilitation Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. No Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records. No compensations Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. As of now, there is not any court Case.Site progress photos (15 works Water supply) Kota _ 19/10/2020 ey a bs reaReporting Format for Water Supply Project Il. Construction Stage (Oct. 2020) 1. Common Attributes: 2. A-General Details a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Jaipur ©) Name of Project: Work of organization urban water scheme Jaipur city with Tyears O & M including 01 yeat Defect liability period ie design (selected part) Build Operate and Maintenance, 4) Project Code: RAJ-JAI-006 €) Approved Project Cost in SAAP: Rs. 50.0 Cr. ) Project included in which SAAP ie.I/IVIII: SAAP- IIL g) Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details i.e. SAAP-I, Il or IIL: No h) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 98 i) Name of Reviewing Agency(IRMA): Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. JV with JPS Associates J) Date of Review : 5.10.2020 k) Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit: Mr. Rajendra Arya 1). Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal ete.): PHED, Jaipur m) Key Concerned Officer (8) interacted during r Saurabh and Contractor’s PM Mr, Amit Ohri iew : Xen.: Mr-Sanjay Sharma, AEn Majar Deen TA Mr. n) Number of visits already made for the project ; 6th B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (ti ): Provide timelines, de’ pact on project, revised ‘timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 8"SLTC dt. 27.01.2017 b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 28.10.2016 : ©). Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RfP). If there is any delay please give reasons: NIT issued date- 12.07.2017‘Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as per the requirement 4) Publication Details of NIT: (17.07.17 Times of India),(20.7.17 Special India), (Rajasthan Patrika, 19.7.17) €) Date of issue of Work Order: 02.02.2018 f) Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 02.02.2018 1g) Actual date of start of work: 01.07.2018 h) Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s Unipro Techno Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. i) Contractual Amount. Please also indicate here difference from amount approved inSAAP: Work Order Amount: Rs. $9.30 Cr. (Rs.9.30 Cr. difference from amount approved in SAAP) 3. Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: Mille Stone Targeted For % Reasons for | Rescheduled | 4, Project The Period As Per plan the date based sada Milestone remedial Component delay on ‘completed measures performance Total Target | Achieved _ Quantity | Quantity | Quantity = =f] No permission by | JDA due to Rainy | Further Date season. extended to Work stopped due | Jan 2022 in to festive season. | viewdelay | Work stopped due | due late to election permission Road cut Continual waterPipe | 37545 | a7zaa_| 21500 | s7.72% | Permissiondelayed | elections, | INetwork(km) andissued by | monsoon, Nagar festive 29.3.2019 vide | season and letter no local PHED may be 387/KXEN/HMZ/W | hindrances advised to fake necessar Due to heritage city ction sothat ‘and tourism season | 31/12/2020 work speed night work started ‘And an improve, jouse service FC agenda Connection | 997° 9970 3350 | 33.60% | Dependon pipe | for interim Consumer laying TE UPTO water meter | 70283, 70283 36800 | 43.27% 01.05.2021 Nos) has put up Pump House a === Electro Delayed due to mechanical Quality Action plan work at 1 1 a 100% | for VED from PHED Ramniwas Bagh New Depimprovement] Item dropped of suction Header already HED may Header at supplied e advised Central Park - fo resolve Pumping he matter. Station Iinstrumentati Work suffered due on, to Pandemic Automation | 1 o8 80% | covidia | and SCADA a, Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and ‘quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, ot coverage of water supply system ete. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector b. Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs, IRMA consultant also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate, For the updation of progress on AMRUT portal, m AMRUT APP is installed in Mobile phone of concern AE /JE of the Nagar Parishad/ULB,.An OTP (one time password is required to access and uploading the photos. Concern AE/JE updates the progress on Portal weekly/Monthly. 4. Quality Assurance a. Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports, Building Work construction has not been started therefore there is no any activity of material testing ete at site. b. Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records During site visit, IRMA found satisfactorily quality of construction materials used in the project. c. Ifany deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify During visit, no found any deviation against specifications as given in the DPR. . When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prev: ‘on quality assurance! check results. ‘There are no issues related to quality. e. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions, During site visit, IRMA reviewed quality and no found of any case of non-conformance at site. 5, Commercial Performance: a, Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, ic. performance with respect to clauses such as - guarantee / warranty, defects-liability, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that ULB has followed and maintained all above mentioned — licenses. Bank “If any discrepancy is observed, while reviewing the project, the IRMA agency may sagas EPA to conduct necessary tests to check the quality of the materials used. ;6 etc, and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with dedu Govt. rules) As per agreement between contractor and PHED, Contractor has submitted Bank Guarantee, Details as given below Contractor submitted BG of Rs .1.8 Cr amount valid up to 19.2.2021 and for balance amount requested to PHED to deduct equivalent amount against remaining BG in successive RA bills. Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact, There is no any critical commercial terms and conditions mn of tax (as per Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters. Financial Performance: Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project Al the counter parties contributed their fund parts. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any). IRMA reviewed bank reconciliation statement and found fund utilized on the concerned project only. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made. Such documents will include — Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, etc. IRMA reviewed documents related to claim. Upto 9" RA Billed 28.5.2020 amount is Rs. 26.55 Cr. and pending amount of Rs.9.75Cr. due to non- availability of fund. If any discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During Documents review, no found any discrepancy in the above. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any As 9.75 Cr. is still outstanding so required to disburse the fund immediately. Unbilled amount of Rs 3.5 C+ work in progress , payment needs to be expedited Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate, Compliance to the statutory requirements Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. No environmental clearance required Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures site by visual observation and examination of records, The report should include health concerning workers at site,During visit at camp site, IRMA found thatContractor has arranged all necessary health and safety equipment’s at site. Contractor deploys new workers at site after conducting health and safety training and contractor reviews health and safety measure time to time. ‘Adequate first aid facilities approved by a health authority have maintained and made available in every labor camp for the emergency treatment of injured persons. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. During visit at site, IRMA found that contractor has maintained standard of health and sanitation arrangements at camp site. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons The project is being executed on road side. Therefore there is no issue of Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. Due to no required of land acquisi ns, there is no matter of resettlement and rehabilitation. Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records, No compensations Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. No court Cases,Site Progress Photos 5.10.2020 Gangaouri BajarReporting Format for Water Supply Project IL. Construction Stage (Oct, 2020) 1. Common Attributes: A- General Det a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Jodhpur ©) Name of Project: “Execution of the work of Re organization and Rehabilitation of Urban Water Supply Scheme, Jodhpur with 7 years Operation & maintenance Including 01 year defect liability period i.e. design (selected part), Build Operate and maintenance. 4) Project Code: RAJ-JOD-004 ©) Approved Project Cost in SAP: 25 Cr Project included in which SAAP ie. VIVIT: SAP — II] 8) Whether the project falls in more than one SAP. If yes please provide details i.e, SAAP-I, II or ML: No hh) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 09 i) Name of Reviewing Agency (IRMA): Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. JV with JPS Associates 5) Date of Review: 14.10.2020 k)_ Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit: Mr. Rajeev Dagla 1) Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal ec.): PHED, Jodhpur 1m) Key Concerned Officer (8) interacted during review: E.E Sunil Harsh (PHED, Jodhpur) n) Number of visits already made for the project: 05, this is 6 visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, dey on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 7" SLTC on dated 02.12.2016 b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 28.10.2016 ©) Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RP). If there is any delay please give reasons: 03/17-18, 28.07.2017Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as per the requirement d) Publication Details of NIT; NIT No.3/2017-18 ©) Date of issue of Work Order: 12.12.2017 f) Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 22.12.2017 8) Actual date of start of work: 22.12.2017 ‘h) Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s Shree Kisan Brothers i) Contractual Amount, Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAP: Work Order Cost: 9.38 Cr (Capital cost 8.15 Cr., O&M Cost- 1.24Cr.) Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: Mile Stone Targeted | seasons for Reseheduled sl. Project For i % Re for “Gate based | Advise on No. ‘Component ‘The Period As Per a hi m remedial P o Completed) delay ‘measures plan [performance | BOQ | Target | Executed ] ose) Quantity | Quantity | Quantity 1 | Water Supply ACEISE, Network(Km) | PHED TL | Rising Main (Km) 3.10 | 3.10 3.10 | 100% jodhpur may advised to 1.2. | Distribution (Km) 24.35 | 24.35 | 23.93 | 98.34% provide approval/dire 2 | Road Restoration (Job) 1 T 08 80% tion for fork progress procuring the 3 | Consumer Multi Jet 4903 4903 0 0 flelayed due to water meter Water Meters ayment delayed immediately. Replacement of pump & 4 | accessories 4 4 24 | 100% PHED may For Meter, be advised to 5 ‘LT MCC Panel & APFC 100% ‘endor is complete the Panel 8 8 8 ° bpproved but | 51 19.2020 ~ — PHED, Jaipur & activities Consiruction of Consumer IAP of meters is regularly 6 | Care at (SE, PHED, city ill under with no lapse circle campus) 1 1 1 100% process ‘on dept side. Rejuvenation of meter The work of 7 | testing laboratory, office 95% filter media building ete. 8 1 0.95 replacement and Rehabilitation Civil work i : 7 | SE office, Ex. En office & ema Revenue Office etc. L 1 0.95 95% pipe line is ‘Repairing of GSR & nie at 8 | ousR 2 2 2 100% the earliest. [Also advised| 8 | sist Wo 3 e y | | to start the 1 1 | oos | %% | laboratory a a | mediately Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g, number of taps, or coverage of water supply system etc. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector 4903 house connections will be connected Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. IRMA consultant also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate. Progress is not being uploaded on AMRUT portal Quality Assurance Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports, Contractor has not established lab at site, Contractor conducted cube tests from external laboratory. Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for pipe, Cement, Steel, ete, CIPET, Jaipur (Govt. approved) is inspecting of HDPE & DI pipes RITES, Jaipur (Govt. approved) is inspecting of DI pipes Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records During site visit, found quality of construction materials used as per standard. If any deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify No found any deviation against specifications as given in the DPR. When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurance! check results. There are no issues related to quality. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions. During site visit, IRMA reviewed quality and no found of any case of non-conformance at site. Commercial Performance: Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, ic. performance with respect to clauses such as ~ guarantee / warranty, defects-tiability, licenses, bank ‘guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that ULB has followed and maintained all above mentioned — licenses. Bank guarantee, insurance etc, and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with deduction of tax (as per Govt. rules) Executing agency has not submitted Bank Guarantee, so PHED has deducted 10% amount of RA bill from each RA bill. Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact There is no any critical commercial terms and conditions between parties. Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters, ancial Performance: Ley "If any discrepancy is observed, while reviewing the project, the IRMA agency may suggest to the PEA to conduct necessary tests to check the quality of the materials used.Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project Al the counter parties contributed their fund parts. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any), Total received Rs. 5.20 Cr. and utilized the same on the project. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made. Such documents will include — Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, etc. IRMA reviewed documents related to claim, ‘The total payment has been paid upto 5*RA bill of gross amount Rs.5.20 Cr.- till date. Rs.1.5 Cr. still outstanding due to non-availability of funds ‘The payment has been made after deductions as per agreement If any discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During Documents review, no found any discrepancy in the above. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any Required to financial disbursement at the earliest. Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate, Compliance to the statutory requirements Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. No environmental clearance required Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site. During visit, IRMA found that executing agency has arranged all necessary health and safety equipment’ at site. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. During visit at site, IRMA found that contractor has arrangements project camp at site for their staff. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons ‘There is no issue of Resettlement and Rehabilitation. Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. Not applicable Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records No compensations Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. As of now, No court Cases,Site Progress Photos (Water Supply, Jodhpur)_14.10.2020 Replacement of pumps Pump Replacement Control Penal Repair and paint of OHSR Control PenalReporting Format for Water Supply Project HL. Construetion Stage (Oct. 2020) 1. Commonattributes: A- General Details a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Nagaur ©) Name of Project: “Execution of the work of Re organization and Rehabilitation of Urban Ws Supply Scheme, Jodhpur with 7 years Operation & maintenance Including 01 year defect liabil period ice. design (selected part), Build Operate and maintenance. 4) Project Code: RAJ-NAG-003 €) Approved Project Cost inSAAP: 50 Cr f) Project included in which SAP i.e.I/I/III: SAAP ~1 2) Whether the project falls in more than one SAP. If yes please provide details ie. SAAP-L, II or IIL No h) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 45 a) Name of Reviewing Agency(IRMA): SREI Infrastructure Finance Limited JV with JPS Associates i) Date of Review : 16.10.2020 i) Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit: Mr. Rajendra Arya k)_ Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal etc.): PHED, Nagaur Region Ajmer 1) Key Concerned Officer (s) interacted during review : AEN Mr Ajay Meena, Mr.Radhakishan Siyota Project Manager from M/s Lahoti Buildcon m) Number of visits already made for the project : 6" Visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA. a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 3" SLTC on 25.04.2016 b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 04.09.2015 ©) Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (R¢P). If there is any delay please givereasons: 16.01.2017Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as per the requirement d) Publication Details of NIT: Could not traced €) Date of issue of Work Order: 30.06.2017 1) Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 30.06.2017 8) Actual date of start ofwork: 09.07.2017 h) Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s Lahoty Buildcon Ltd i) Contractual Amount, Please also indicate here difference from amount approved inSAAP: Capital Cost: 41.32 Cr; O&M: 5.11 Cr, Work order Cost: 46.43 Cr 2, Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: [Rescheduled sl. i % } Advise on No c Project ‘ Mile Stone Targeted For __| Milestone eee | date based | ‘remedial . ‘omponen' ‘The Period As Per plan ‘Completed! Y on measures performance, BOQ | Target | Executed {Quantity| Quantity] Quantity DI K-7 Rising main | 1 | &distribution 100 mm 10350 mm 2891 | 28.91 18,800 | 65.03% | > | HDPE distribution | 90mm to 200 mm 211,82] 211.82 | 180.50 a PHED ra Due to bedi d 4, | sonstruction of OHSR monsoon, advise the work " 1000 Kt with room | We werk improve joundary wal 1 1 ied mo | Provision of Consumer Reseed | so that 4. | House Service 43.90% | wy, work can Work 31.12.2020 Connection 27332 | 27332 12000 suffered be gusto complete isi Procured - Pandemic within s Provision and fixing of | 7559 70000 | 174% | eamgem time line, Mater meres 27332 _| installed-4850 Provision for «¢ | construction of Master Control Centre with 7 35% SCADAz_ | Construction of pump 1 on house | 1 1 Minor repairing of Scada existing SR civil and , and 8 | electro mechanical 49 94.74% electrical work 19 18 work pending Layout not PHED finalised | 9 | Consumer care Centre | 3 om ft hneeds to Seana! Finalise } 3 0 availabil tnd of land en Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of water supply system etc, Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector Meter connection -27332 total progress is slow due to least cooperation from consumer PHED may advised to motivate and initiate awareness campaign in this regard b, Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Aff . IRMA consultant also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate Uploaded regularly 3. Quality Assurance a. Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports. Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for pipe, Cement, Steel, etc Test lab has been setup at site for cube tests. National Test House, Jaipur (Govt. approved) is inspecting of HDPE pipes b. Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records During site visit, found quality of construction materials used as per standard, If any deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify ‘No found any deviation against specifications as given in the DPR. 4d. When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurance check results. rn here are no issues related to quality. e. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions. During site visit, IRMA reviewed quality and no found of any case of non-conformance at site. 4. Commercial Performance: “Af any discrepancy is observed, while reviewing the project, the IRMA agency may suggest to the PEA to conduct necessary tests to check the quality of the materials used.6. a, Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, performance with respect to clauses such as — guarantee / warranty, defects-tliability, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc. (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that ULB has followed and maintained all above mentioned — licenses. Bank guarantee, insurance etc. and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with deduetion of tax (as per Govt. rules) BG No. 3188318BG0000525 amounting Rs 1 Cr valid up to 30.12.2020 and 3188318BG0000025 amounting Rs 1 Cr valid up to 31.12.2020 as Performance Security Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact, There is no critical commercial terms and conditions by either party. Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters. Financial Performance: Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project Fund received at Division office from Head Office does not include bifurcation of funds contributed by various parties (GOI and GOR or ULB/PHED). Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any), Verified and found fund utilized on this project only Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made, Such documents will include ~ Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, etc. IRMA reviewed documents related to claim and found ok 9 RA bill of Rs. 1.25 Cr. certified but not paid due to shortage of funds, The payment has been made after deductions as per agreement.10" RA bill of Rs 1.60 Cr and 11" RA bill of Rs 3.20 Cr submitted but not paid due to fund issue. If any discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During Documents review, no found any discrepancy in the above. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation, At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any Required to disburse the fund at the earliest. Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate. ‘Compliance to the statutory requirementsReport on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. ‘No environmental clearance required Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site. Contractor has not maintained proper health and safety equipment at site. Required to maintain and use health and safety equipment, Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. Contractor has not maintained health and sanitation arrangements at camp site Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons ‘There is no issue of Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition ‘team and the DPR. Not applicable Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records. No compensations Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. No court Cases,Site Photos (Water Supply, Nagaur)_16.10.2020 ESR Rehabilitation 4 Nos jajolai esr ma Rees foee tgs ae Oris Ry ucE Gey ia f . ie ERG) : pyar ene aReporting Format for Water Supply Project If, Commissioning, Trial Run and Testing Stage (Oct 2020) 1, Common Attributes: ‘A> General Details a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Sujangarh ©) Name of Project: Execution of the work of Re-organization Urban Water Supply Scheme Sujangarh with 7 years O&M including 01 year defect liability period d) Project Code: RAJ-SUJ-001 €) Approved Project Cost in SAAP: 25.0 Cr, Revised sanction 12.8 Cr. ) Project included in which SAAP ie. VIV/IIL: SAAP -I 2) Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP, If yes please provide details i.e. SAAP-I, IL or IIL. No h) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 08 a) Name of Reviewing Agency(IRMA): SREI Infrastructure Finance Limited JV with IPS Associates i) Date of Review: 09.10.2020 i) Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit: Mr. Rajeev Dagla k) Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal etc.): PHED, Sujangarh 1) Key Concerned Officer (s) interacted during review: AEn Mr Kailash Saini, m) Number of visits already made for the project: 05,this is 6" visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact on Project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 2nd SLTC dated 21.03.2016 a) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: In Ist meeting dated 04.09.2015 SHPSC authorized to SLTC for approval of DPRs. b) Date of issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RIP). If there is any delay please give reasons: NIT no.: 06/2016-17, 17.03.20174 6 Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as per the requirement °°) a) °) i 8) h) Publication Details of NIT: 17.03.2017 Date of issue of Work Order: 02.06.2017 Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 11.06.2017 Actual date of start of work: 12.07.2017 ‘Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s Maheshwari Contractors pvt. Ltd., Nokha Contractual Amount, Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Capital Cost: 10.94 Cr.; O&M (7 years) Cost: 1.86 Cr.; Total: 12.80 C ‘Work has been Completed, but completion formalities such as Issue of Completion certificate, Submission of as Built drawings by contractor, and Provide comments on handing over of all documentation, “As Built” drawings, operational instructions and equipment manuals to the O&M team and list the same T ps built General Arrangement Drawings Yes’ 2 [As built Detailed Engineering Design Drawings Yes 3 _ [As built Drawings for Miscellaneous components Yes [Test & Investigation Reports Yes 5 [Materials report Yes © [Third party certificates Yes 7 {0 &M Manual (Including equipment manuals) Yes Department (PHED Sujangarh) may be advised to provide “as built” Design & drawings. Provide comments on level of participation during testing by the O&M team. PHED staff Jen, AEn, & Executive Engineer has been participated during testing. Report about the adequacy of training provided to the O/M team in terms of the following: List of trained staff is as under: 1.Mr. Babulal (Project Manager) 2.Mr. Narayan (Fitter) 3.Mr. Mahavir (Fitter) 4.Mr. Vikram Singh (Supervisor) 5.Mr. Kapil Sharma(Supervisor) 6.Mr. Dana Ram (Assistant) 7.Mr. Girdhari (Assistant) Report about the Trial run / testing of the projects completed? Works are completed and water supply system has been handed over to contractor for O&M. DLP period is going on. Indicate the problems / performance level of the plants /machinery during trial run stage? No any problems occurred during tril run stage and performance level achieved as per prefixed milestone, If the performance level of the plants and machinery is not adequate and satisfactory, list Wimeasures suggested? Plants and machinery provided are performing adequately, Provide details on the assessment of the O&M arrangement for the project, specifically of its adequacy, financial arrangement and sustainability O&M of the water supply system is being done by main contractor executed the works. The payments to the contractor are done by PHED by its own sources. 8 Provide details on the expected outcomes from the projects and quantification in terms of achievement of service level benchmarks, 17500 Water meter has been installed to enable volumetr will save the water from wastage ling. And installation of leak detection equipment Site Photographs.Reporting Format for Water Supply Project ILL. Commissioning, T: 1. Common Attributes: ‘As General Det a. Name of State: Rajasthan b. Name of City: Sikar ¢. Name of Project ; Augmentation and Rehabilitation of UWSS SIKAR comprising of construction of SOURCE (TW), RCC OSHRs, CWR, Pump house, SITC of pumps sets, PLITC of various sizes DUHDPE pipe lines, boundary wail, Ancillary civil works, SCADA with , 7 years O&M including one year defect lability period and ‘other associated works under Reorganization of UWSS Sikar, District sikar on single Responsibility tunkey basis (Estimated Cost Rs. 2797.00 lacs) 4. Project Code: RAJ-SIK-002 ©. Approved Project Costin SAAP: Rs. 30.50 Cr. (SAAP-II) Project included in which SAAP ic. VIIA: SAP IL 8. Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details ie, SAAP-I, Il oF IIL: No h. Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 42 i, Name of Reviewing Agency (IRMA): Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd, 1V with JPS Associates 4. Date of Review : 07.10.2020 k, Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Technical Expert |. Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastaaletc.): PHED, Sikar m, Key Concerned Officer (s) interacted during review : A.En Mr Prem Kumar (PHED, Sikar) , Sugna Ram Bishnoi Site Engineer Contractor. 1. Number of visits already made for the project; 05, This is 6” visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA a, Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: 2" SLTC Dated 21.03.2016 b. Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 11.05.2016. © Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RIP). If there is any delay please give reasons : NIT issued on dated 24.06.2016 4, Publication Details of NIT: 01/2016-17 Date of issue of Work Order: 30.12.2016 £ Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 09.01.2017 & Actual date of start of work: 09.01.2017 hh, Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/s Devendra Construction Co. ute Ap ot 1 Capital Cost: Rs.24.28 Cr. O&M Cost: 1.97 Cr., Total Cost : 26.25Cr. i wd2, Provide comments on handing over of all documentation, “As Built” drawings, operational instructions and equipment manuals to the O&M team and list the same 1 {As built General Arrangement Drawings Yes 2 _ [As built Detailed Engineering Design Drawings Yes 3 [As built Drawings for Miscellaneous components Yes 4 [Test & Investigation Reports Yes 3 [Materials report Yes 6 frst Party certificates ‘Yes 7 [O&M Manual (Including equipment manuals) Yes 3. Provide comments on level of participation during testing by the O&M team. PHED staff Jen, AEn, & Executive Engineer has participated during testing. Name of the experts and Engineers Participated in training. 4, Report about the adequacy of training provided to the O/M team in terms of the following: Higher Level staff, Manager O&M is experienced and trained in the O&M of the water supply. List of trained staff is as under: Manager ~ 01 Plumber ~ 05 Electrician -01 Fitter 02 Labour ~ 03 Site Engieer-01 Supervisor -01 Pump Operator- 21 Chemist-01 5. Report about the Trial run / testing of the projects completed? ‘Works has been completed, and DLP period is going on. ‘Testing lab is established but not started to conduct tests. PHED may be advised to conduct and maintain the water tests immediately. Indicate the problems / performance level of the plants /machinery during trial run stage? ‘No any problems occurred during trail run stage and performance level achieved as per prefixed milestone. 7. If the performance level of the plants and machinery is not adequate and satisfactory, list the correction measures suggested? Plants and machinery provided are performing adequately. details on the assessment of the O&M arrangement for the project, specifically of its adequacy, financial arrangement and sustainability. The project is under DLP stage now. During O&M monthly payments shall be made @ 1/12th of the stipulated fixed amount to contractor. O&M charges included all expenditures and expenses req occurred on labour, repair, and /or replacement of material, equipment, consumable items, fu all other things of what so ever nature essential and desirable to run the system satisfactorily. Financial requirement will be made from following sources:1. Water consumer user charges 2. Grant from GoR 9. Provide details on the expected outcomes from the projects and quantification in terms of achievement of service level benchmarks, Service Level Indicator Unit | Before project | After project ‘Service Level Coverage Coverage of water supply connection % 87 100 Per capita quantum of water supplied LPCD 120 135 Extent of metering of water connections % 50 100 ‘Continue of water supply Hi/day 125 46 Efficiency of Redressal of consumer % 80 100 ‘complaints | Bffcieney in collection of water supply | % 90 30 related charges Extent of NRW —_ % 40 15-20 Quality of water % 94.48 100 Kindly note that Rs.18.89 Cr. has been paid to contractor and Rs.5.65 Cr. still pending of 8 and Final RA bill. PHED may advised to release the payments at the earliest.Site Progress Photographs (07.10.2020)Reporting Format for Water Supply Project IL. Construction Stage (Oct. 2020) 1, Common Attributes: ‘A- General Details a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Sawai Madhopur ©) Name of Project: Execution of the work of reorganization of Urban Water Supply Scheme with 07 years operation and maintenance including 01 year defect liability period under AMRUT Mission (Package-01).. 4d) Project Code: RAJ-SAW-002 ©) Approved Project Cost in SAAP: 50.00 Cr. 1) Project included in which SAP i.e. VIV/ISI: SAAP — IIT ) Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details ie. SAAP-I, Mor Ill: No h) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 10 i) Name of Reviewing Agency (IRMA): Srei infrastructure Finance Ltd. JV IPS Associates i) Date of Review: 15/10/2020 k)_ Name of personnel of Review Agency making the site visit: Sanjay Kumar 1) Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal ete.): PHED, Sawai Madhopur m) Key Concerned Officer (s) interacted during review: Ex.En. K L Gupta, Bhupendra singh yadaw (P.M.) contractor. n) Number of visits already made for the project: 05, this is 6" visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, deviation, its impact on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: Sth SLTC on 15.09.2016 & 10th SLTC on 17.05.2017 b) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 28.10.2016 ©) Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RfP). If there is any delay please give reasons: 31.05.2017, NIT No.5-7PHEI7/18WL0B02095 EX + a‘Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the discretion to change the Reporting Formats as per the requirement d) Publication Details of NIT: 31.02.2017, Gulabi Halchal, Rajsthan Patrika, Rashtradoot, The indian Express €) Date of issue of Work Order: 11.12.2017 £) Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 21.12.2017 2) Actual date of start of work: 26.12.2017 h) Name of Contractor/ Executing agency: M/S Devendra Construction Company, Jodhpur Contractual Amount, Please also indicate here difference from amount approved in SAAP: Capital Cost: 49.21 Cr., O&M Cost: 5.24 Cr., Total Cost: 54.45 Cr. Work order amount is 20% above the SAAP Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs icated below: Mille Stone Targeted For Rescheduled Project The Period As Per plan % | enters for | date based | “dvise on Coneonert Milestone the on remedial Ps Completed | delay | evtormance| _easures Total | Target | Executed Quantity | Quantity | Quantity Water Suppl 5, | Due tonon- Network(em) 113.46 | 113.46 | 95.65 | 49.0% | availability Rising Main(Km) | 3778 | 3778 | 23.85 | 63.12% | {Of fundthe contractor is Pipe line testing not able to PHED may be (distribution & 151.24 | 151.24 | 70 46.28% | do work and advised to Rising Main) because of speed up the House Connection 7o00_| 7000 | 3500 | 50.00% | this work wer progress is OHSR (Ashok Nagar)| 1 1 on 1% not up to “s satisfactory. Required to 5 /——)_ Pipe Line Ouiskes wi OHSR, Phante ki 1 1 0.80 | oxy | ameeane OHSR’s with pullia : laying an source sothat —— Civil Work is. OHSR con be OHSR, (Harijan Basti)} 1 1 0.95 | (95%) going on. commissioned oH Work slowed | 21/12/2020 OHSR (Bambhori) 1 1 95% last 6 months due OHSR (Bapu Nagar) | 1 1 0.95 95% | to CONID- OHSR (BSNL 1 1 0.80 30% Colony) ‘CWR, Madhosingh 1 1 0.90 90% pura Pump House 1 1 0.75 15% ‘Other Work, _|_075 T. Repairing oF Contractor existing CWR GLR 1 1 0% — | responsible madhosinghpura 0 for slow KEIN2.Providing progress Installation elector 1 Chlorinator on 1 we existing CWR 0 3. Repairing of . existing OHSR S| es | a | mm Item 4. Centrfgal pump Procured set supply & 2 2 o but installation (Nos.) | instalation is pending 3. submersible pump set supply & us | 6 | 64 55 installation 6. Panel starter 58 38 [oo L 0% | Supplied 7. Master control ly, Centre | ' o1 | % 8. Consumer Care % | Drawin centre ee 020 20% | approved 9.Campus Tom | And development e\-# o | ™ | Estimate 10.Boundary Wall 8 8 0 |0% ‘| under Fi 7 i rogress Ti-Fumitured water | ; 0 om | Prose Collar a] 12, Repairing PH, Building, Office’ =| 1) I 0 0% Building & quarters _| T3SCADA & i Instrumentation ' ' ° % | supplied _ ‘a. Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs. Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of water supply system etc. Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. [RMA consultant also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate. At present, there is no mechanism with PHED for monitoring of physical, financial progress, project ‘outcomes. IRMA advised fo setup of mechanism for the same. AS the AMRUT App in not working properly, PHED is unable to upload the photos since last 6 months 3. Quality Assurance a Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFT) and reports. ‘There is no lab established at site. Contractor conducted Cube tests from external laboratory. Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for Cement, Steel, etc. RITES issued proof checking certificates for cube tests MSME, Jaipur inspected pipes Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records During site visit, found quality of construction materials used as per standard. If any deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify No found any deviation against specifications as given in the DPR.4d. When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of materials used, IRMA agency may prevail on quality assurance! check results. There are no issues related to quality. ¢. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions. During site visit, IRMA reviewed quality and no found of any case of non-conformance at site, 4. Commercial Performance: a. Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, ie. performance with respect to clauses such as ~ guarantee / warranty, defects-liability, licenses, bank guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, etc, (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that ULB has followed and maintained all above mentioned ~ licenses. Bank guarantee, insurance etc. and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with deduction of tax (as per Govt. rules) Contractor has not submitted BG so PHED deducted 10% from each RA b. Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and cond impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact There is no any critical commercial terms and conditions between parties ls. ' by either party that has an ¢. Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters. 5. Financial Performance: a, Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project All the counter parties contributed their fund parts. b. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any), IRMA reviewed bank reconciliation statement and found fund utilized on the concerned project only. ec. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made, Such documents will include ~ Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, et. IRMA reviewed documents related to claim. The total payment has been paid up to 6" RA bill of gross amount 11.26 Cr. ‘The payment has been made after deductions as per agreement. Contractor has been submitted RA bill 8" 7.55 Cr/ and the same is certified but not paid due to non- availability of fund, d. If any discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail?” During Documents review, no found any discrepancy in the above. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. £. Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any necessary tests to check the quality of the materials used.6 8 More quantity has been executed of approximate Rs. 4.0 Cr. tll date so required to disburse the fund. Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate. Compliance to the statutory requirements a Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. No environmental clearance required Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records. The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site. During visit at camp site, IRMA found that Contractor has not arranged all necessary health and safety equipment’s at sit. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. During visit at site, IRMA found that contractor has not arrangements at proper camp site. Contractor has hired house on monthly rent basis Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons ‘There is no issue of Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Report on persons requiring resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as reported by the land acquisition team and the DPR. The land is transferred from UIT and Nagar Parishad. There are no habitats at land so there is no requirement of resettlement and rehabilitation. Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records. No compensations. Report on court cases, which likely to affect the physical progress of the project. As of now, No court Cases,Site Progress Photos (Water Supply, Sawai Madhopur)_15/10/2020Reporting Format for Water Supply Project TI. Construction Stage (Oct. 2020) 1, Common Attributes: A- General Details a) Name of State: Rajasthan b) Name of City: Jhalawar ©) Name of Project: Execution of thework of reorganization of Urban Water Supply Scheme (UWSS) Jhalawar with 07 years operation and maintenance including 01 year defect liability period under AMRUT Mission. 4) Project Code: RAJ-JHA-O01 ©) Approved Project Cost in SAAP: 75.00 Cr. ) Project included in which SAP ie.I/IV/III: SAAP — Ill 2) Whether the project falls in more than one SAAP. If yes please provide details ie, SAAP-I, II or UL: No h) Serial Number in AMRUT portal: 12 a) Name of reviewing agency(IRMA): Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. JV with JPS Associates b) Date of review:23.10,2020 ©) Name of personnel of review agency making the site visit: Mr. Rajeev Dagla 4d) Implementing Agency (Example: ULB/Parastatal etc.): PHED, Jhalawar ©) Key Concemed Officer (s) interacted during review: Mr. Ram Narayan Pankaj - JEN (PHED), Mr. Mangal Singh Parmar AEn PHEl f) Number of visits already made for the project: 05, This is 6" visit B- Review of Project Implementation Plan (timelines): Provide timelines, devi ‘on project, revised timelines and suggested remedial measures by IRMA ion, its impact a) Date of Appraisal of DPR by SLTC: Sth SLTC on 15.09.2016 a) Date of Approval of DPR by SHPSC: 28.10.2016 b)_ Date of Issue of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) / Request for Proposal (RfP). If there is any delay please give reasons: 06.01.2017Note: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has the the requirement °) 4) °) A ® h) Date of issue of Work Order Contractual Amount. Please als Publication Details of NIT: Could not be traced 8.04.2017 Scheduled Date of Start as per WO: 27.04.2017 Actual date of start of work: 27.04.2017 68.66 Cr., O&M Cost: 5.97 Cr., Total Cost: 74,63 Cr. Name of Contractor : M/S Vishnu Prakash R. Pungliya Ltd, Jodhpur icate here difference from amount approved in SAP: Capi rretion to change the Reporting Formats as per 1 Cost: 2. Physical Progress: To be verified with records of measurement books and also include field photographs List as indicated below: Reschedule Mile Stone Targeted For 7 Reasons | {40° | Advise on ‘The Period As Per plan Mitestone | for the | performanc | Femedial Project Component _ Completed | delay |e measures BOQ | Target | Fxecuted Quantity | Quantity | Quantity Rising Main (13.32Km) 1332| 13.32 | 12.195 | 91.55% | 1. Drawing Hydro Testing of Rising mains 13.32] 13.32 | 12.195 | 91.55% | and Distribution Line (Km) 164,259 | 164.259 | 102.64 | 62.49% | Location issues. , Hydro Testing of Distribution line 2. Rainy Work is (Km) 164.259 | 164.259 | 78.769 | 47.95% | season, being OHSR state delayed { Slection, | Cotracto |PHED may 1250_KL ESR at Khandiya 1} 4 0.95 95% __|3. Heavy |Thasnot [be advised 450 KL ESR at Civil Lines(Zone- | traffic applied | to speed up 06) 1 1 0.95 | 95% |e ag | fortime the work so 900 KL ESR at RICCO (changed | and extension. |that project from RHB) ee 1 1 0.95 95% | narrow | Workis [can be 900 KLESRat Newly ] road & — | ®xpected /completed Developed Colony 1 1 0.90 90% | streets, | tbe jon 500 KL ESR at Mangal pura near |4.Land | completed jrescheduled PG Collage 1 1_| 095 | 959% | for900 | By march date 550 KL ESR Near Masjid 1 1 0.95 | 95% | KL Tank . CWR at Newly 30 KLCWR AtChhant T developed 1500 KL CWR At Chhapi WTP laren ras HW 1 1 0.75 | 75% _| Slotted 350 KL CWR At ZONE -5 late by 5 | Khandiy ft 1__| 095 | 95% | months 150 KL CWR At PHED Ex En from Office 1 1 0.95 | 95% _ | NagarParishad. Expansion of Capacity of 18 5.Ban on MLD to 36MLD WTP atChappi | 1 1 0.95 | 95% _| sand. PUMP & Accessories-2no. Vt 6. Planned pump at chappi, 2 no. pump at 900 KL chappi WTP, 4 no. at OHSR at Khandiyahw,2 no. pump at REB was pipajikadeh& 4no, Pump at changed to rarikebalaji 1 1 0.95_| 95% _| RICCO. Campus | ‘Making house service connection 7.550 KL | from water supply distribution OHSR | pipe line upto water meter near chamber, with MDPE (Class-PE Masjid 80) 13470 | 13470 | 3450 | 25.61% | — was Construction of Consumer Care | shifted to Centre minimum plinth area 100 a location | sqm as at( MAMA BHANIA near garh HEAD WORKS) Housing bord palace | and at BALA JI KI. CHATRI Wo 0.95 | 95% _| 8.Resident Construction of two story Master | so Control Centre minimum plinth resistance area of each story 100 sqm. PHED atchhapi_ XEN OFFICE HEAD WORKS. 1 1 0.70 | 70% _| site. 9.For ‘Construction of store building ‘minimum plinth area 100 sqm At RadiKeBalaji 08 80% Rehabilitation Work - SE or office,Ex En office,AEN office eee JEN & AEN Residential tle Building,Existing pump house ont building etc. 1 1 | 070 | 0% | wee Rising Height of Anicut at a BinduDeh by 500 mm (kali er sindhrever) 1 1 1 100% | ree service connection | sare hindered by public resistance, Meter not installed because they are not Instrumentation automation and | supplied SCADA n 1] 070 | 70% yet. a. Report on progress against year wise targets set for expected outcomes from the project and quantification of achievement of SLBs, Provide details e.g. number of taps, or coverage of water supply system etc, Please provide separate achievements of each of the SLBs as per the sector As above.b. Report on regular updation AMRUT Portal (progress) and AMRUT App (Android) (site photographs of progress) developed by the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. IRMA consultant also has to upload the latest site photographs on AMRUT App in addition to ULB and Mission Directorate. Progress is not being uploaded on AMRUT Portal. 3. Quality Assurance a. Comment on methodology and frequency of tests carried out by the contractor/quality assurance Consultant by examining Requests for Inspection (RFI) and reports, ‘Contractor has not established lab at site. Contractor conducted cube tests from external laboratory. Contractor has maintained Manufacture certificates for pipe, Cement, Steel, etc. National Test House, Jaipur (Govt. approved) is inspecting of DI pipes. 3 party material inspection is not in practice at PHED works, b. Observe and report on the quality of construction materials used in the project and ascertain from the records During site visit, found quality of construction materials used as per standard. But found so many seepages on WTP units. c. Ifany deviation against specification as given in the DPR, please specify No found any deviation against specifications as given in the DPR. d. When there are major issues related to ascertain the quality of mate on quality assurance! check results. There are no issues related to quality. Only laying work is in progress. e. Report about cases of non-conformance from quality reviews based on available documents and interactions. ‘During site visit, IRMA reviewed quality and no found of any case of non-conformance at site. s used, IRMA agency may prevail 4. Commercial Performance: a. Comment on commercial performance with respect to commercial terms and conditions, i.e. performance with respect to clauses such as — guarantee / warranty, defects-tiability, licenses, bank ‘guarantee, insurance, payment schedule, taxes, dispute resolution mechanisms, ete. (List the details) IRMA reviewed commercial terms and conditions with respect to clauses such as mentioned above and found that PHED has followed and maintained all above mentioned — licenses. Bank guarantee, insurance etc, and payment paid to contractor as per agreement payment schedule with deduction of tax (as per Govt. rules). Bank Guarantee details are as follows (1) BG No. 18721GPER000118 of Rs. 2.50 Cr./- Valid upto 28.10.2020 (2) BG No, 18721GPERO10119 of Rs. 0.50 Cr./-Valid upto 04,02.2021 (3) BG No. 18721GPERO10818 of Rs. | Cr/- Valid upto 23.10.2020. Totaling 4.0 Cr rupees as Performance Security, this is more than 10% of the payment made to contractor. b, Provide comments on enforcement of critical commercial terms and conditions by either party that has an impact on time and cost of the project along with quantum of impact. PHED HAS BEEN IMPOSED 50 LACS LD. c. Suggest remedial measures to improve commercial performance Project is being implemented as per commercial performance parameters. 5, Financial Performan 1e PEA to ree “If any discrepancy is observed, while reviewing the project, the IRMA agency may suggest conduct necessary tests to check the quality of the materials used.6 Report the quantum and timelines of contribution of funds from all the counter parties of the project by verifying receipts statements. In case of delay, mention impact on project Bifurcation of funds contributed by various parties (Gol and GoR ULB/PHED) is not available at the XEn office. Total funds received till this inspection is Rs. 41.69 Cr. Report on utilization of funds in verification with bank reconciliation statements. Also state variation with respect to project progress on site (if any). 100% of this fund has been utilized. Review documents related to claim for payments and payments made, Such documents will include ~ Invoices, Measurement Book, Bank statements, etc. IRMA reviewed documents related to claim Rs 40.31 Cr. has been paid upto 12" RA bill (partly paid).Rs 1.6 Cr. is balance from the 12" RA bill. If any discrepancy in the above three leading to major change in the overall project performance, please report in detail? During Documents review, no found any discrepancy in the above. If there is any major variation in the overall project cost (+ 5 %) report in detail. Also report on additional financial arrangements by State/ULB in case of cost escalation. At present, there is no any variation in the overall project cost. Remedial measures to expedite the financial disbursement for sanctioned Projects if any Total Unpaid outstanding (work done) is Rs. 6.5 Cr. approximately. Funds may release on priority for smooth working, Report on adequacy of systems for project related financial management Present system for project related matter is adequate. Compliance to the statutory requirements Report on compliance to directives by State and Central environmental agencies stated during the environmental clearance of the project, compliance with the Environmental Management Plan for the project, and good environmental management practices of the industry. ‘No environmental clearance required. Nor any land Ii in the forest area. Report on provision, installation, and usage of health and safety equipment, procedures and practices at site by visual observation and examination of records, The report should include health and safety issues concerning workers at site. During visit, IRMA found that contractor has arranged all necessary health and safety equipment’s at site. Report on standards of health and sanitation arrangements maintained at campsite by visual observation and discussion with the concerned stakeholders. During visit at site, IRMA found that contractor has arrangements project camp at site for their staff. Report about the progress of Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons There is no issue of Resettlement and Rehabilitation. ig resettlement and rehabilitation assistance as ones nd Kees Report on persons requi team and the DPR.Not applicable. £, Report on compensation awarded and / or to be paid as per the records, No compensations. 8. Report on court cases, which likely to affeet the physical progress of the project. No court Cases. Site Progress Photos (Water supply) Jhalawar_ 23.10.2020 CWRat ExEN Office OHSR at Newly Develop Colony