Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/339791957
CITATIONS READS
2 288
3 authors:
Ivana Müller
Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Berlin
2 PUBLICATIONS 2 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Who are millennials and Zed generation and how to communicate with them View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Sanja Popovic-Pantic on 10 November 2020.
10.1 Introduction
Reflections on the first generation in Serbia born into the digital technology
age bring up the following question: How “native” are the Serbian Millennials
really, and how does their web experience influence their consumer behaviour?
Focusing on these two issues and using the information gathered from the
research study, we have designed the “digital-behaviour segments” model with a
point-based instrument, which comprehensively classifies Millennial individuals
into four specific groups by their web experience. Leaning on Prensky’s digital
native theory (Prensky, 2001), we have named these groups digital natives, smart
immigrants, not-so-flexible immigrants and digital refugees.
The aim of the research study is to identify the values, lifestyles and con-
sumer behaviour of the Serbian Millennial population. In addition, the goal of
the research is to analyse whether there is a significant difference in consumer
behaviour among specific groups of Millennials stratified according to their
web preferences.
The literature used in this chapter as a foundation provides insight into
different definitions of the Millennials, their consumer behaviour, and their
demographic and other characteristics worldwide and in Serbia, with the
aim of providing broader scope to the examination of their role in shaping
state-of-the-art consumption. The literature review highlights the empirical
resource of data related to the Serbian Millennials, presenting their characteristics
which influence consumption and which will be the subject of research in the
next sections.
We then present the methodology used in the stratification of the sample
and description of the strata.
The results and discussion section presents our research findings on the
attitudes and behaviour of the four groups of Millennials according to their
digital activities, e-commerce habits, food and drink consumption and media
10.2 Literature review
The main characteristics of the Millennial generation (according to some
definitions, those who were born in the period between 1980 and 2000) are
primarily an outstanding technological literacy, creativity, high level of educa-
tion, and also high expectations of life and a drive for successful careers which
should fulfil them emotionally. According to Ng and McGinnis Johnson (2015),
different authors have variously labelled this generation, in consideration of
some historical events, as Gen Y, Gen Me, Net Gen, Nexus Generation, and
Millennial Generation (Advertising Age, 1993; Barnard, Cosgrove and Welsh,
1998; Burke and Ng, 2006; Howe and Strauss, 2000; Twenge, 2006). Since the
publication of Howe and Strauss’s (2000) Millennials Rising, interest in the mil-
lennial generation has become widespread, particularly among marketers and
employers (Hoover, 2009). Since they often postpone large purchases and do
not insist on owning real estate and do not mind sharing ownership, they are
sometimes also called the “renter generation” or “economy of sharing” gener-
ation.Thus, some authors think that the new millennial economy is developing
with this generation. They are very curious and eager to gain new knowledge
and experiences and to take active part in the world around them.They quickly
accept new technologies and the Internet, which they use on an everyday basis.
They are active in social networks and blogs and they use applications and
gadgets. Despite the fact that they were born and grew up in times of crisis in
the country, they have become young people with a lot of energy and ideas
who are fond of digital ways of communication.They are a generation of impa-
tient, experimental learners, digital natives, multitaskers and gamers who love
the flat networked world and expect nomadic connectivity 24/7 (Sweeney,
2006). This new generation has a lifelong engagement with digital platforms,
which present their way of working, learning and living, are aimed at providing
their satisfaction and meeting their expectations, and are related to their values
and behaviours (Mamula and Necak, 2018).
Technological progress brought about big changes in consumers’ behaviour,
markets and marketing over the past century. The technology allows individ-
uals to express themselves and collaborate with others. According to Kotler,
Kartajaya and Setiawan (2010), the rise of three major forces shaped the business
landscape into Marketing 3.0: the age of digitalization, the age of participation
and the age of creative society.
Millennials’ advantage is their outstanding knowledge and use of tech-
nology, which is why they work considerably faster and more productively
1 Does not use a computer at all (does not spend time on a computer, does
not play video games, does not watch movies on a computer), and does not
play video games on a cell phone or tablet.
2 Uses the Internet less than once a month or never.
3 Owns a simple cell phone or does not own any of the devices mentioned
above (in characteristic number 6 of the digital natives).
4 Does not use any of the social networks.
5 Does not buy and does not intend to buy stuff online.
3 Digital Refugees
4
5 Smart Immigrants
6
7
8
9
10 Digital Natives
11
12
• To be self-employed (56 per cent) rather than “work for someone else”
(27 per cent).
• To work in one company for a longer period (65 per cent) rather than to
change companies (17 per cent).
• To work in a state-owned company (48 per cent) rather than in a private
one (31 per cent).
• To have stable (49 per cent) rather than flexible working hours (38 per cent).
Thirteen to twenty- one per cent of Millennials do not have preferences
regarding these statements (do not mind).
More than nine out of ten Millennials in Serbia are online everyday (91 per
cent), and 94 per cent are using social networks. More than eight out of ten
own smartphones (82 per cent); 86 per cent keep their mobile phones next
to the bed when sleeping and 60 per cent cannot imagine their life without
mobile phones or modern technology. Over 40 per cent almost always gather
information through different online channels (product websites, social media
and reviews) before purchasing a product.
Note: *Sgn. differences compared to digital immigrants and refugees (95% conf. level).
regarding online sales in the region, where 46 per cent of the population pur-
chase online. However, Serbia is ranked better than Croatia, which has 2 per
cent less than Serbia (29 per cent). Behind Serbia there is Bulgaria with 18 per
cent and Romania with 16 per cent. Macedonia and Montenegro are at the
bottom, with only 15 per cent and 13 per cent respectively (Eurostat, 2017;
Bejatovic and Mamula, 2018).
According to our study, over half of Serbian Millennials still do not pur-
chase online (51 per cent). Taking into account their familiarity with digital
systems, we can see a significantly different picture (Figure 10.2): 94.3 per
cent of all online buyers are either digital natives or smart immigrants. Also,
more than 80 per cent of digital natives are online buyers. On the other hand,
over 80 per cent of not-so flexible immigrants and over 90 per cent of digital
refugees do not purchase online.
Over half of online non-buyers will also stay non-buyers (53.4 per cent, or
27.2 per cent of the total), according to their future plans. Smart immigrants
are going to make the biggest step into online purchase: 56.8 per cent of these
online non-buyers are planning to start purchasing online. The future of digital
refugees is to stay non-buyers: 84.8 per cent of non-buyers do not plan to start
purchasing online.
A Chi-squared test shows a significant dependence between purchasing
online (present and future) and familiarity with digital systems (p<0.01). A Z-
test on the 95 per cent significance level shows that at the moment, as well as
in the future, there are significantly more digital natives among online buyers
than natives among people who do not purchase online (now: 41.6 per cent
vs. 9.2 per cent, future: 32.0 per cent vs. 6.6 per cent) (Figure 10.3). Digital
100%
7.2%
90% 23.3%
27.2% 11.6%
80%
70% 61.2%
60% 23.7% 30.6% 78.0%
50%
40% 81.3%
30% 21.6%
49.0% 46.2%
20%
14.0%
10% 17.3%
8.0%
0%
Serbian Digital natives Smart Not-so-flexible Digital refugees
Millennial immigrants immigrants
80% 22.7%
70% 52.7% 31.3%
60% 59.0%
50%
40% 59.0%
30% 47.8%
20% 41.6%
32.0%
10%
9.2% 6.6%
0%
Online buyers Online non-buyers Future Online Future Online non-
buyers buyers
Note: *Multiple-choice question.
the other hand, digital refugees agree significantly more than digital natives and
smart immigrants with this statement.
It is also interesting to consider their behaviour in consumption of specific
groups of fast-moving consumer goods.
How often do you consume each of the following Digital Digital Millennials
products? At least few times a week I eat/drink natives immigrants total
and refugees
Note: *Sgn. differences compared to digital immigrants and refugees (95 per cent conf. level)
2%
Internet 97% 1%
TV 86% 11% 3%
Every day or at least few times a week Once a week or less often Never
using the Internet (96.7 per cent) and 86.2 per cent watch TV every day or at
least a few times a week.
Among six observed media channels, weekly magazines (print) take the last
place with less than 10 per cent of Millennials claiming to use this medium
every day or at least a few times a week. At the same time, printed weekly
magazines have the highest number of non-users (27.6 per cent).
Figures 10.5 and 10.6 represent media consumption of a group of digital
natives and smart immigrants on one side (Figure 10.5), compared to a group of
not-so-flexible immigrants and digital refugees on the other side (Figure 10.6).
We observe significant differences (95 per cent conf. level) in media usage
between these two millennial groups, i.e. between digital natives and smart
immigrants on one hand and on the other hand not-so-flexible immigrants
and digital refugees. There are significantly more digital natives and smart
immigrants regularly using the Internet (99 per cent vs. 85 per cent) and online
daily newspapers (71 per cent vs. 44 per cent). On the other hand, watching TV
or reading printed daily newspapers every day or at least a few times a week is
characteristic rather of the Millennials who are less familiar with digital systems
(not-so-flexible immigrants and digital refugees).
10.5 Conclusion
Continuous technology evolution influences our lives, regardless of age. We use
online technologies more and more for work, leisure, online shopping and other
activities. The rapid growth of online technologies usage has “greatly increased
the need for consumers to develop digital competence” (OECD, 2009).
Every day or at least few times a week Once a week or less often Never
* Sgn. differences comparing to Not -so-flexible immigrants & Digital refugees (95% conf. level)
TV 93%* 7% 1%*
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Every day or at least few times a week Once a week or less often Never
* Sgn. differences comparing to Digital natives & Smart Immigrants (95% conf. level)
References
Advertising Age (1993). Generation Y. Advertising Age, 64(36), 16.
Barnard, R., Cosgrove, D., and Welsh, J. (1998). Chips and pop: decoding the nexus gener-
ation. Toronto: Malcolm Lester.
Bejatovic, G., and Mamula,T. (2018). Innovations as a key factor in the development of e-commerce.
Conference proceedings of Innovation as an Initiator of the Development: MEFkon,
International Conference, Belgrade, November 2018, pp. 349–366.
Burke, R. J., and Ng, E. (2006). The changing nature of work and organizations:
implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review,
16(2), 86–94.
Euromonitor International (2015). The impact of Millennials’ consumer behaviour on
global markets. http://blog.euromonitor.com/2015/12/the-impact-of-Millennials-
consumer-behaviour-on-global-markets.html (accessed 14 September 2018).
Euromonitor International (2019). 2018 survey results: using consumer types to under-
stand the path to purchase. https://blog.euromonitor.com/white_paper/2018-survey-
results-using-consumer-types-to-understand-the-path-to-purchase (accessed 21
December 2019).
Eurostat (2017). Digital economy and society in the EU. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/
cache/infographs/ict/index.html (accessed 14 April 2019).
Hoover, E. (2009). The millennial muddle: how stereotyping students became a thriving
industry and a bundle of contradictions. Chronical of Higher Education, 11 October 2009.
http://chronicle.com/article/The-Millennial-Muddle-How/48772/ (accessed 14
October 2018).
Howe, N., and Strauss, W. (1991). Generations: the history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069.
New York: William and Morrow.
Howe, N., and Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: the next great generation. New York:
Vintage.
Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., and Setiawan, I. (2010). Marketing 3.0. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Mamula, T., and Coso, D. (2015). Millennials’ way of e-learning and communication in
the digital era.The Sixth international Conference on e-Learning (eLearning-2015),
9780367232511_pi-218.indd
View publication stats 168 27-Jan-20 22:10:09