SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA

JOHNSON GONSALVES
JOHNSON Date: 2021.10.22
GONSALVES 11:24:23 +0530

sg 1/2 901.wp3418-21.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO.3418 OF 2021

Anandrao Vithoba Adsul .. Petitioner

v/s.
Enforcement Directorate, Government
of India And Anr. .. Respondents
….
None for the Petitioner.
….
CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR &
SARANG V. KOTWAL JJ.

DATE : 21 OCTOBER 2021.

P.C:-

The matter is listed for Speaking to Minutes in view of

certain grammatical errors in the order dated 14 October 2021.

2. In the last sentence of paragraph 15, after the words “ruling

dispensation”, the words “and the contention that” and after the word
“there”, word “is” be added. The sentence shall thus read “Therefore,
the Petitioner cannot create a case of malafides by simply suggesting
that the Petitioner had filed proceedings against a member of the
ruling dispensation and the contention that the action by the
Enforcement Directorate is vitiated by malafides is too far fetched to
accept in the facts of this case because there is no material placed

1 of 2
 sg 2/2 901.wp3418-21.doc

before us except hints, to accept it as a legal ground of challenge.”

3. In the first sentence of paragraph 19, word “Article” be

added before digit “226” and word “Section” be added before digit
“482” and the words “do not” after the word “we” have been incorrectly
written and the same be deleted. The first sentence of paragraph 19 be
read thus: “To conclude, therefore, having considered the grounds
urged by the Petitioner in the invocation of Article 226 of the
Constitution and Section 482 of Cr.P.C, we find that the Petitioner has
failed to make out a case for interference.”

4. Rest of the order remains the same. Corrected order be

uploaded on the sever.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

2 of 2