You are on page 1of 10

Cold Susceptibility and Disinfestation of Bactrocera invadens

(Diptera: Tephritidae) in Oranges


Author(s): T. G. Grout, J. H. Daneel, S. A. Mohamed, S. Ekesi, P. W. Nderitu, P. R.
Stephen, and V. Hattingh
Source: Journal of Economic Entomology, 104(4):1180-1188. 2011.
Published By: Entomological Society of America
DOI: 10.1603/EC10435
URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1603/EC10435

BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the


biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online
platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations,
museums, institutions, and presses.
Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates
your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use.
Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial
use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the
individual publisher as copyright holder.

BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers,
academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research.
COMMODITY TREATMENT AND QUARANTINE ENTOMOLOGY

Cold Susceptibility and Disinfestation of Bactrocera invadens


(Diptera: Tephritidae) in Oranges
T. G. GROUT,1,2 J. H. DANEEL,1 S. A. MOHAMED,3 S. EKESI,3 P. W. NDERITU,3
P. R. STEPHEN,1 AND V. HATTINGH4

J. Econ. Entomol. 104(4): 1180Ð1188 (2011); DOI: 10.1603/EC10435


ABSTRACT To develop a cold disinfestation treatment for the fruit ßy Bactrocera invadens Drew,
Tsuruta & White (Diptera: Tephritidae) that is rapidly spreading across Africa, research was con-
ducted in Nairobi, Kenya, using ßies from a laboratory culture and ÔValenciaÕ orange (Citrus sinensis
L. Osbeck) as the host. The developmental rate of B. invadens in Valencia oranges was determined
at 28⬚C, and the third instar was found to be the least susceptible of the egg and larval life stages to
cold treatment at 1.1⬚C in oranges. When 22,449 B. invadens third instars were exposed in oranges to
a cold treatment with an approximate midpoint of 1.1 ⫾ 0.5⬚C, the results suggested that a period of
16 d would be worthwhile verifying on a larger scale in oranges. Results from the Þrst replicate of 16,617
larvae showed no survivors, but the second replicate of 23,536 larvae had three survivors. Because a
longer cold treatment based on a mean temperature of 1.1⬚C would create logistical difÞculties for
some export markets, further replicates were conducted at an approximate midpoint of 0.5⬚C and at
mean hourly maximum of 0.9 ⫾ 0.5⬚C, for 16 d. After three replicates, in which 65,752 B. invadens third
instars in total were treated with no survivors, the Japanese requirement of 99.99% mortality at the
95% conÞdence level was surpassed. The following treatment protocol for B. invadens larvae in oranges
can therefore be recommended: fruit pulp to be maintained at temperatures of 0.9⬚C or lower for 16
consecutive days.

KEY WORDS Bactrocera invadens, cold disinfestation, quarantine, commodity treatment, phyto-
sanitary

Bactrocera invadens Drew, Tsuruta & White (Diptera: Macfad., is more likely to be infested than other Citrus
Tephritidae) (Drew et al. 2005) was Þrst detected on species (Mwatawala et al. 2006).
the African continent in 2003 (Lux et al. 2003) at the It is inevitable that B. invadens will eventually in-
Kenyan coast by using a protein-baited trap and later vade South Africa because it has recently been de-
described in 2005 as a pest that was completely new to tected along the borders with Zimbabwe and Bo-
science (Drew et al. 2005). Since then, established tswana (IPPC 2010). If it becomes established, export
populations have been found as far west as Senegal fruit markets will require assurance that there will be
and Cape Verde, to the north as far as Sudan, to the no live fruit ßy in the exported fruit, or if there are, that
east as far as the Comoro Islands and south to Namibia they will not survive in the country that is receiving
and Mozambique (⬇18⬚ S) (Ekesi and Muchugu 2007; the fruit. The following research was therefore con-
Rwomushana et al. 2008b). This ßyÕs primary host ducted at the International Centre of Insect Physiol-
seems to be mango, Mangifera indica L. (Anacardi- ogy and Ecology (ICIPE) in Nairobi, Kenya, to de-
aceae) (Rwomushana et al. 2008a,b), in which it is termine whether the 16-d cold treatment at a mean of
outcompeting the native fruit ßy Ceratitis cosyra 1⬚C for the Mediterranean fruit ßy, Ceratitis capitata
(Walker) in tropical Africa at low altitudes where the (Wiedemann), that was previously veriÞed by Grout
relative humidity is high (Ekesi et al. 2006, 2009; Ndi- et al. (2011), or the USDAÐAPHIS postharvest cold
aye et al. 2008). B. invadens also has been recorded as treatment schedule T107-a (APHIS 2010) requiring
a pest of various Citrus species (Rwomushana et al. 14 d at or below 1.11⬚C for C. capitata, would give
2008b), but in Tanzania, grapefruit, Citrus paradisi adequate control of B. invadens larvae in ÔValenciaÕ
orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck).
1 Citrus Research International, P.O. Box 28, Nelspruit 1200, South Earlier research in Kenya has led to the develop-
Africa. ment of a suitable artiÞcial diet (Ekesi et al. 2007) and
2 Corresponding author, e-mail: tg@cri.co.za. provided information on the development and opti-
3 International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box
mal rearing temperature for B. invadens, found to be
30772Ð 00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
4 Citrus Research International, Department of Conservation Ecol- 28⬚C (Rwomushana et al. 2008b). This allowed for the
ogy and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, P.O. Box 2201, Matie- provision of suitable numbers of B. invadens larvae for
land 7602, South Africa. this postharvest research with oranges. Although very

0022-0493/11/1180Ð1188$04.00/0 䉷 2011 Entomological Society of America


August 2011 GROUT ET AL.: B. invadens COLD SUSCEPTIBILITY IN ORANGES 1181

little citrus is exported from Kenya as fresh fruit, South els of plant protection products required by the Eu-
Africa is the second largest exporter of citrus in the ropean Union for fresh citrus (Borrell-Fontelles and
world after Spain (FAO 2006). Some South African Schmidt 2005). All the oranges were examined for the
fruit is exported to countries that require either a cold presence of fruit ßies before they were used in tests,
treatment for the moth Thaumatotibia leucotreta and no damaged fruit were used.
(Meyrick) or for the Mediterranean fruit ßy. The Phase 1: Larval Development of B. invadens in
United States of America requires a cold treatment for Oranges. To determine how long the different life
the former pest of either 22 or 24 d (depending on the stages took to develop at 28⬚C, three replicates of the
time of year) at or below ⫺0.55⬚C (Schedule T107-k, following procedure were conducted using Valencia
APHIS 2010), and some other countries insist on the oranges (69 mm in diameter). It was determined that
same requirement. This extreme treatment will con- 1 ml of B. invadens eggs was equivalent to 16,000 eggs,
trol any fruit ßy so the need for citrus exports to the and ⬇35 eggs were required per fruit in 0.025 ml of
United States having to meet the less stringent re- liquid, so the eggs were diluted with the appropriate
quirements for fruit ßy is largely irrelevant. The ob- amount of distilled water to provide this ratio. Counts
jective of our study was therefore to primarily develop of the number of eggs in 10 aliquot samples per rep-
a treatment that would satisfy the Japanese require- licate later showed that a mean number of 32 eggs per
ment of 99.99% mortality at the 95% conÞdence level. fruit were used in the Þrst replicate and 33 in the
However, we decided to aim above this requirement second and third replicates. The eggs (not older than
and obtain 99.9968% mortality (Probit 9), although not 24 h) were inoculated into each orange on 14 August
at the 95% conÞdence level that would have required 2008 after Þrst removing the calyx and punching a hole
the treatment of 93,613 larvae without any survivors using a 6-mm-diameter cork borer into the stem end
(Follett and Neven 2006). of the fruit. Some Torula yeast (between 0.2 and 0.5 ml
of a mixture with water in a 1:2 ratio) also was injected
into the inoculation hole to provide additional nour-
Materials and Methods
ishment for the larvae. The inoculation procedure was
This research was conducted in four phases. The conducted as three batches of 130 fruit. Each batch
Þrst phase was to determine the larval development was treated as a replicate. After inoculation the hole
rate in oranges at an ideal rearing temperature. The was plugged with sterilized cotton wool and later
second phase was to determine which developmental sealed with hot wax. Each orange was placed in a
stage (egg or larval) would be the least susceptible to brown paper bag in a perforated plastic crate (Polyair
cold. The third phase involved the treatment of this 240 with dimensions 585 by 400 by 240 mm, Kenpoly
least susceptible life stage at the approximate mean Manufacturers Ltd., Nairobi, Kenya). Approximately
temperature of 1.1⬚C for various periods to determine 75 fruit were placed in each crate with one bagged
what length of treatment would be required. The fruit being placed in each crate before a second fruit
fourth phase was conducted to verify whether the was placed in a crate. The crates of fruit were stored
projected period of cold treatment at 1.1⬚C would in an incubation room (4,360 by 3,360 by 2,400 mm) at
provide the required level of mortality. 28⬚C and positioned according to the replicate. The
Test Insects. B. invadens was reared at the ICIPE temperature was maintained in the room by an air-
mass rearing facility following the procedure de- conditioning system and monitored with the use of
scribed by Ekesi et al. (2007). Adults that emerged three different types of thermometers: a mercury
from puparia were fed on a 3:1 ratio of sugar and bulb, an alcohol bulb (both 305 mm, type BS1704-S,
enzymatic yeast hydrolysate ultrapure (USB Corpo- Brannan [United Kingdom] laboratory thermometers
ration, Cleveland, OH), and water on pumice gran- meeting ISO 1770:1981 requirements from Lowveld
ules. The viability of the eggs that the adult ßies pro- Chemicals CC, Nelspruit, South Africa), and an elec-
duced for use in the various experiments were tronic thermometer (SIKA, Kaufungen, Germany,
monitored for each citrus infestation to ensure that the with accuracy ⱕ1% of range). From the Þrst day
results of the tests were not compromised by infertility through to the 15th day after inoculation, seven fruit
or poor egg viability. The viability was tested by col- were dissected daily from each crate, and the number
lecting Þve samples of eggs laid over a 1-h period of fruit ßy larvae in each instar determined. Dissected
(Ekesi et al. 2007), and samples of 100 eggs were larvae were carefully measured under a stereomicro-
placed on moist black cloth in a covered petri dish and scope with the assistance of Leica Application Suite
held at 28 ⫾ 2⬚C for 5 d to determine percentage of egg software, and at least six larvae per day were mounted
hatch. The percentage of egg hatch on artiÞcial me- on slides and examined closely to determine what
dium would typically be close to 80% (Ekesi et al. instars were represented. Although the primary ob-
2007), but if it dropped to ⬍60% in any of the Þve jective for conducting this study was to determine
replicate petri dishes, the trials that used that batch of how long it took for each instar to develop, a further
eggs were discarded. 25 infested fruit per replicate were placed on sand and
Test Fruit. Valencia oranges that were used for all the number of pupae determined daily by sieving the
the experiments were of export quality purchased sand from 19 August onward. The pupae were allowed
from a local supplier in Nairobi. These oranges were to develop and the number of adults emerging deter-
imported into Kenya from Egypt or South Africa and mined to gain more information about the life cycle of
met the required standards for maximum residue lev- B. invadens in citrus at 28⬚C.
1182 JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 104, no. 4

Phase 2: Determination of the Most Cold-Tolerant as the egg stage group and held at 28⬚C for 4, 2, and 1 d,
Life Stage. The cold room (3,450 by 2,380 by 2,620 respectively, before being dissected. Two replicates
mm) used at ICIPE had a new Zanotti Uniblock SP-O were conducted and the susceptibilities of the differ-
refrigeration unit Þtted that was well suited to the ent life stages to the cold treatment were analyzed
required temperature range. The temperature probes with Probit analysis (Finney 1971) using the Proban
used were type “T” thermocouples with a tolerance of program (van Ark 1995) with 95% Þducial limits
0.5⬚C (Temperature Controls Pty., Ltd., Randburg, (FLs).
South Africa). These were calibrated before each Phase 3: Determining the Required Cold Period.
treatment using the freezing point method where the The Þrst replicate of phase 3 was started on 17 April
probes were immersed in melting ice, and the tem- 2009. B. invadens eggs were supplied from ICIPEÕs
perature recorded when they reached equilibrium. A culture and using export-quality Valencia oranges im-
thermometer immersed in the melting ice was used to ported from Dole South Africa Pty. Ltd., Bellville,
conÞrm the temperature. At least three calibration South Africa, by East Africa Growers, Nairobi, Kenya.
runs were conducted, and the mean result for each Eggs (54 per fruit) were inoculated into 4,320 Valencia
probe was used for correction purposes. Readings
oranges with some Torula yeast and the fruit held at
were recorded hourly on a data logger (Grant SQ 2020
28⬚C until the fruit ßy reached third instars (6 d). A
1F8, Monitoring and Control Laboratories Pty. Ltd.,
cork borer (6 mm in diameter) was used to make a
Johannesburg, South Africa). Thirty-three cartons
(400 by 300 by 270 mm) of export quality Valencia hole for inoculation in the depression left after re-
oranges (69 mm in diameter) were acquired from moving the calyx. The holes were later plugged with
Dole South Africa Pty. Ltd., Bellville, South Africa, via cotton wool and sealed with wax. Three hundred and
the Kenyan importer East Africa Growers, Nairobi for sixty control oranges were dissected and inspected
both replicates. The fruit had been harvested in South through 5-diopter head loupes or stereomicroscopes
Africa ⬇3 wk earlier and kept in cold storage while on 23 April to determine the number and survival of
being transported and after arriving in Kenya. The Þrst third instars. The remaining 3,960 oranges were trans-
replicate started with inoculation on 13 October 2008, ferred into the cold room on the same day. The 55
and the second replicate started on 8 December 2008. crates of fruit were arranged in 11 stacks, Þve crates
In each replicate, eggs (⬍24 h old) were inoculated high, and a gap of 5 cm was kept around all crates to
into 1,400 fruit as described above (35 per fruit), and assist air ßow. There was a gap of at least 50 cm
the fruit stored in paper bags that were placed in between any crates and the walls of the cold room, and
perforated plastic crates as described for phase 1. One the room could contain at least 100 crates. Tempera-
group of 300 fruit was moved to the cold room (set for tures were recorded hourly as before using type “T”
a mean fruit pulp temperature of 1.1⬚C) on the day of thermocouples (described above); 14 in the pulp of
inoculation (egg stage), and the rest of the fruit were oranges (30 mm in depth) and two to monitor the
held at 28⬚C. Fourteen temperature probes were in- incoming and outgoing air temperatures in front of the
serted (30 mm in depth) into the pulp of oranges circulation fans.
scattered among the other fruit in the cold room, and The room temperature was brought down as
two other probes were used to monitor the incoming quickly as possible from ambient (⬇26⬚C), but due to
and outgoing air temperatures in front of the circu- the large amount of warm fruit it took almost 3 d for
lation fans. Whenever fruit was moved from the in- half of the 14 probes in the fruit to reach the required
cubation room into the cold room, it was moved 12 h temperature or below (a similar trend is shown in Fig.
earlier than the time required for the start of the cold 3), which was when the cold treatment of 1.1⬚C was
treatment for the fruit to start cooling down from 28 deemed to have started. Batches of 660 oranges were
to 1.1⬚C. Thus for the treatment that started 2 d after then removed from the cold room after 3, 5, 7, 9, 11,
inoculation, 300 fruit (containing Þrst instars) were
and 13 d of treatment and kept at 28⬚C for 24 h before
moved into the cold room 36 h after inoculation. A
being cut. Oranges were inspected under magniÞca-
third batch of 300 fruit (containing second instars)
tion to determine the number of surviving larvae.
was moved into the cold room 84 h after inoculation
for the 4-d treatment. After 6 d, the last batch of 300 The second replicate of phase 3 was initiated on 2
fruit (third instars) was moved into the cold room. The July 2009 with inoculation of 4,300 export-quality Va-
remaining 200 fruit (four batches of 50 fruit per life lencia oranges from the same source as before using 58
stage group) were used as controls and held at 28⬚C eggs per fruit as described above. After having been
and then dissected 6 d after inoculation. Fifty fruit incubated at 28⬚C for 6 d, 378 fruit were cut to deter-
from the egg stage group were removed from the cold mine infestation and mortality levels, and the remain-
room on each of days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13 after ing fruit were moved into the cold room on 8 July. The
commencement of the cold treatment and held at 28⬚C fruit reached the required temperature on 11 July, and
for 6 d. The fruit was then dissected and the number thereafter 660 fruit were removed for cutting and
of living and dead (no movement after prodding and determination of mortality at the required intervals as
often with brown discoloration) larvae noted. Mor- described above.
talities were corrected according to Abbott (1925). The data from phase 3 were subjected to Probit
Batches of 50 fruit from the Þrst-, second-, and third- analysis using the Proban program (van Ark 1995) to
instar stage were removed at the same time intervals determine the length of cold treatment required.
August 2011 GROUT ET AL.: B. invadens COLD SUSCEPTIBILITY IN ORANGES 1183

Phase 4: Verification of Temperature–Period Com- Table 1. Phase 1: Larval development (based on measure-
bination. The Þrst replicate of phase 4 to evaluate a ment) at 28°C with time after inoculation for three replicates of 105
fruit each inoculated with 32 (replicate 1) or 33 (replicates 2 and
16-d period at 1.1⬚C was initiated on 20 August 2009 3) eggs
when 2,500 export-quality Valencia oranges imported
from Dole South Africa Pty. Ltd. by East Africa Grow- SE of Instar
Days after Mean size Total no.
ers were inoculated with ⬇50 eggs each according to inoculation (mm)
replicate
larvae
ratio
the technique described above. The fruit were incu- means (%)a
bated at 28⬚C until 26 August when 500 control fruit 1 0 No larvae
were cut to determine larval infestation levels and 2 2.90 0.20 59 100:0:0:0
3 4.81 0.14 71 93:7:0:0
natural mortality, and the remaining fruit was moved 4 7.58 0.75 113 0:87:13:0
into the cold room. The 40 crates were arranged in 5 9.01 0.30 129 0:30:70:0
eight stacks, Þve crates high, with 5-cm gaps around 6 9.45 0.09 134 0:9:91:0
the blocks. Fourteen temperature probes were again 7 9.72 0.10 149 0:0:99:1
8 9.96 0.09 146 0:0:97:3
inserted into oranges scattered among the other fruit 9 10.03 0.15 145 0:0:97:3
in the cold room, and two other probes were used to 10 10.19 0.19 93 0:0:78:22
monitor the incoming and outgoing air temperatures. 11 9.85 0.13 95 0:0:88:12
Readings were recorded hourly using the same data 12 10.19 0.07 124 0:0:85:15
13 10.01 0.03 116 0:0:87:13
logger as described above. The fruit reached the re- 14 9.80 0.06 103 0:0:80:20
quired temperature after 2 d on 28 August. On 13 15 10.28 0.08 103 0:0:80:20
September, the fruit was transferred to the 28⬚C room Total 1580
after 15 d and 23 h. The disinfestation period was a
intentionally terminated 1 h early to prevent any vari- First:second:third:puparia.
ance in interpretation of temperature records from
extending the period beyond 16 d. The next day, the imported from Dole South Africa Pty. Ltd. by East
fruit was cut once it had reached ambient tempera- Africa Growers, each receiving 55 eggs. The fruit was
ture. Numbers of larvae alive or dead were recorded incubated at 28⬚C until 21 April when 544 control fruit
in each fruit. were cut, and the remaining fruit were transferred to
The second replicate of phase 4 was inoculated on the cold room. The crates were arranged as before.
12 September by using another 2,500 export-quality The target pulp temperature of 0.5⬚C (SEM ⫾ 0.0) was
Valencia oranges from Swaziland purchased from East reached on 24 April after 69 h cooling, and fruit were
Africa Growers and 50 eggs per fruit. The fruit was transferred to the incubation room on 10 May after
incubated at 28⬚C until 18 September when 500 con- 15 d and 23 h. After reaching ambient temperature, the
trol fruit were cut, and the remaining fruit were trans- fruit were cut, and numbers of live and dead larvae
ferred to the cold room and the crates arranged as were determined.
before. The required fruit pulp temperature of 1.1⬚C The third replicate at a mean pulp temperature of
was reached on 21 September, and the fruit was re- 0.5⬚C (probe tolerance ⫾0.5) was inoculated on 14
moved on 7 October after 15 d and 23 h. After being May 2010 with 3,552 export-quality Valencia oranges,
held at 28⬚C for 24 h, the fruit was cut, and numbers imported from Dole South Africa Pty. Ltd. by East
of live and dead larvae were determined. Africa Growers, each receiving 44 eggs. The fruit were
Surviving larvae were found in the second replicate incubated at 28⬚C until 20 May when 520 control fruit
at 1.1⬚C (SEM ⫾ 0.0 and probe tolerance ⫾0.5). Ex- were cut, and the remaining fruit were transferred to
tending the treatment period beyond 16 d would be the cold room. The crates were arranged as described
impractical for the shipping of fruit to Japan, so rather above. The target temperature of 0.5⬚C (SEM ⫾ 0.0)
than conducting the third planned replicate using the was reached on 22 May after 52 h, and fruit were
same conditions a new phase 4 series at an approxi- transferred to the incubation room on 7 June after 15 d
mate mean pulp temperature of 0.5⬚C for 16 d was and 23 h. After reaching ambient temperature, the
initiated. Inoculation of the Þrst replicate of this series fruit were cut, and numbers of live and dead larvae
took place on 4 October 2009, by using 2,830 imported were determined.
Valencia oranges and 44 eggs per fruit. The fruit was While fruit were being cut in this second phase 4
incubated at 28⬚C until 10 October (6 d) when 585 experiment, they were cursorily examined for the
control fruit were cut and the remaining fruit were presence of any signs of chilling injury.
transferred to the cold room. The crates were ar-
ranged as described above. The new target pulp tem-
Results
perature of 0.5⬚C (SEM ⫾ 0.0 and probe tolerance
⫾0.5) was reached on 13 October after 65 h, and fruit Phase 1: Larval Development of B. invadens in
was transferred to the incubation room after 15 d and Oranges. The results of the larval development stud-
23 h on 29 October. After reaching ambient temper- ies at 28⬚C (Table 1) showed that Þrst instars appeared
ature, the fruit was cut, and numbers of live and dead 2 d after inoculation and that most second instars
larvae were determined. appeared 4 d after inoculation. Most larvae had
The second replicate at a mean pulp temperature of reached the third instar by 6 d after inoculation. Com-
0.5⬚C (probe tolerance ⫾0.5) was inoculated on 15 pared with the short larval life stages, the formation of
April 2010 with 2,650 export-quality Valencia oranges, puparia took place over a long time (21 d), perhaps as
1184 JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 104, no. 4

35 outgoing air temperature dropped to 1.0⬚C within 2 h.


Puparia
The natural mortality of B. invadens in oranges be-
30
Adults tween hatching and the third instar was high (Table
25
2), indicating that orange is not an ideal host. Seven
days after inoculation, there was 100% mortality of
Numbers per day

20 eggs in both replicates (Table 2), and the same results


were obtained when larvae began treatment in the
15 Þrst instar. With only two results from each of these
life stages having mortalities ⬍100%, Probit analysis
10
was not possible. The corrected mortalities of second
5
instars after having been exposed for 7 d were 99.73%
for the Þrst replicate and 99.29% for the second rep-
0 licate, whereas for third instars the corrected mortal-
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 ities were 97.83 and 98.68%, respectively. With Probit
Days after inoculation analysis, these differences between second and third
instars were signiÞcant (P ⬍ 0.05) in the Þrst replicate
Fig. 1. Phase 1: total numbers of B. invadens puparia
formed and adults eclosing per day after larvae emerged from
(Table 3) but not in the second replicate. However,
oranges on sand at 28⬚C. the prediction for the lethal time (LT) 99.9% was
higher for third instars than for second instars in both
replicates. These results therefore suggested that the
a survival strategy or due to the larvae having difÞculty third instar was more tolerant to the cold treatment,
in exiting the fruit (Fig. 1). The Þrst larvae left the fruit so this instar was used in further evaluations.
to pupate 7 d after inoculation. The Þrst adults eclosed Phase 3: Determining the Required Cold Period.
17 d after inoculation and most adults eclosed between Although the results of the Þrst replicate seemed to
20 and 26 d after inoculation (Fig. 1). show a steady increase in mortality with time (Table
Phase 2: Determination of the Most Cold-Tolerant 4; Fig. 2) and had an R2 value of 0.9804, the Probit
Life Stage. When the Þrst few crates of 300 fruit were analysis showed extreme variation with a high G value
moved into the cold room the pulp temperature was of 0.28 and wide 95% FLs. The prediction of 19.3 d for
lowered from 24⬚C to 1.1⬚C within 19 h while the 99.9% mortality (Table 4) was therefore considered to

Table 2. Phase 2: Mortality resulting from exposure of different life stages to 1.1°C in oranges for different periods of time in addition
to 6 d at 28°C (egg mortality in media is typically 20%)

Replicate 1 Replicate 2
Exposure
Stage No. eggs No. live Mortality No. eggs No. live Mortality
period (d)
treated larvae recovered (%) treated larvae recovered (%)
Eggs 0 Control 1,785 333 81.34 1,961 271 86.18
3 1,750 126 92.80 1,850 80 95.68
5 1,750 16 99.09 1,924 11 99.43
7 1,750 0 100.00 1,924 0 100.00
9 1,750 0 100.00 1,924 0 100.00
11 1,750 0 100.00 1,850 0 100.00
13 1,820 0 100.00 1,924 0 100.00

First instar 0 Control 1,750 347 80.17 1,961 284 85.52


3 1,750 96 94.51 1,850 71 96.16
5 1,785 14 99.22 1,924 15 99.22
7 1,750 0 100.00 1,924 0 100.00
9 1,785 0 100.00 1,924 0 100.00
11 1,785 0 100.00 1,924 0 100.00
13 1,750 0 100.00 1,924 0 100.00

Second instar 0 Control 1,750 364 79.20 1,961 291 85.16


3 1,750 143 91.83 1,887 114 93.96
5 1,750 35 98.00 1,924 15 99.22
7 1,785 1 99.94 1,887 2 99.89
9 1,750 0 100.00 1,924 2 99.90
11 1,750 0 100.00 1,924 0 100.00
13 1,785 0 100.00 1,924 0 100.00

Third instar 0 Control 1,785 361 79.78 1,887 380 79.86


3 1,785 235 86.83 1,924 131 93.19
5 1,750 78 95.54 1,924 29 98.49
7 1,820 8 99.56 1,887 5 99.74
9 1,750 2 99.89 1,924 0 100.00
11 1,785 0 100.00 1,887 0 100.00
13 1,750 0 100.00 1,998 0 100.00
August 2011 GROUT ET AL.: B. invadens COLD SUSCEPTIBILITY IN ORANGES 1185

Table 3. Phase 2: Expected treatment periods required for 99.9% mortality of second and third instars at 1.1°C

Instar Replicate Days SE Upper FL Lower FL


Second Firsta 9.83 1.834 Not possible Not possible
Third Firsta 11.19 0.641 12.71 10.11
Second Secondb 8.74 0.718 10.62 7.62
Third Secondb 10.92 1.023 13.61 9.32

a
Comparison of second and third instar lines: elevations were signiÞcantly different (F ⫽ 15.951; df ⫽ 1, 4; P ⫽ 0.0160).
b
Comparison of second and third instar lines: elevations were not signiÞcantly different (F ⫽ 0.008; df ⫽ 1, 3; P ⫽ 0.9340).

be unreliable due to the variation (although the later Discussion


phase 4 results with greater replication indicated that
Although B. invadens currently occurs in tropical
this result was quite realistic). With the second rep-
areas its minimum developmental threshold for larvae
licate, results (Table 4) were less variable and the
is 9.4⬚C (Rwomushana et al. 2008b), which is lower
Probit prediction for 99.9% mortality was 15.1 d. The
overall trend therefore seemed similar to previous than that of South African C. capitata larvae found to
results with Mediterranean fruit ßy in Valencia or- be 10.5⬚C by Grout and Stoltz (2007). Our work can-
anges (Ware et al. 2006, Grout et al. 2011) for which not provide conclusive evidence that B. invadens is
16 d at a mean temperature of 1⬚C was found to be more cold tolerant than C. capitata in citrus, because
effective. We therefore decided to verify whether a in these trials B. invadens was exposed to a slightly
16-d treatment at a mean fruit pulp temperature of higher temperature than used by Grout et al. (2011)
1.1⬚C would provide mortality above the 99.99% level for C. capitata when using a larval end point. However,
with 95% conÞdence levels. earlier research with a pupariation end point showed
Phase 4: Verification of the Temperature–Period that a mean fruit temperature of 1.0⬚C for 16 d caused
Combination. The Þrst replicate showed no survivors 100% mortality of C. capitata in oranges (Hill et al.
of 16,617 third instars, but in the second replicate three 1988) and 1.0⬚C for 14 d was adequate for complete
survivors were found in 23,536 larvae (Table 5). Two control of C. capitata in lemons, Citrus limon (L.)
survivors were from one fruit and one survivor from Burm.f., when a pupariation end point was used (Jes-
another fruit. The two fruit were cut by different sup et al. 1993). The energy required to form a pupa
people and the fruit came from different crates in would probably result in some mortality of weak sur-
different parts of the cold room, so the survival could viving larvae but without a direct comparison we can-
not be attributed to a hot spot in the room. The not speculate about the equivalence of this mortality
temperature probes showed no unusually high tem- in terms of days of treatment or lower treatment tem-
peratures (Table 5) that could have explained the perature. Recent results from small-scale (no survi-
survival, so we had to conclude that this cold treat- vors from 104 larvae treated for 11 d) incubator studies
ment was inadequate. in media showed that B. invadens was no more cold
In the three replicates of the phase 4 trials at 0.5⬚C tolerant than C. capitata when treated at a mean tem-
(mean of 0.5⬚C, with the mean of hourly maximum perature of 0.94⬚C (Hallman et al. 2011). Our exposure
temperatures of 0.9⬚C) (Table 5; Fig. 3), no survivors of 21,784 third instars to 1.1⬚C for 11 d resulted in 27
were found in a total of 65,752 treated larvae. The survivors (Table 4), so perhaps if the comparison of
numbers of larvae treated in each of the three repli- Hallman et al. (2011) was repeated with larger num-
cates were 16,437, 17,847, and 31,468. This treatment bers a different result may be obtained.
therefore exceeded the required minimum assurance Research by Rwomushana et al. (2008a) showed
of 99.99% mortality at the 95% conÞdence level and that oranges were not as good a host as mangoes,
also passed the Probit-9 mortality level. No signs of bananas (Musa spp.), or papayas, Carica papaya L., for
chilling injury were observed. B. invadens and that both fecundity and fertility were

Table 4. Phase 3: mortalities of B. invadens third instars in Valencia oranges when treated for different periods at 1.1°C

Replicate 1a Replicate 2b
Days
Total larvae Live larvae Mortality (%) Total larvae Live larvae Mortality (%)
0 Check 4,924 4,219 14.3 5,101 4,151 18.6
3 9,190 3,977 56.7 9,358 4,342 53.6
5 10,300 2,791 72.9 10,247 2,089 79.6
7 11,045 1,141 89.7 9,646 598 93.8
9 11,024 212 98.1 9,910 84 99.2
11 11,110 9 99.92 10,674 18 99.8
13 11,196 1 99.99 11,253 0 100.0

a
Probit analysis for an expected mortality of 99.9% predicted a period of 19.3 d with SE of 4.337, upper and lower Þducial limits of 84.71
and 11.89, and G value of 0.28.
b
Probit analysis for an expected mortality of 99.9% predicted a period of 15.1 d with SE of 1.546, upper and lower Þducial limits of 23.47
and 11.60, and G value of 0.076.
1186 JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 104, no. 4

as citrus. The critical point in establishing such a treat-


100
R2 = 0.9447 ment protocol is selection of the upper threshold tem-
R2 = 0.9804
perature. Treatment protocols set a minimum expo-
90
sure period and a maximum temperature (upper
Corrected mortality (%)

80
threshold). For adequate assurance of efÞcacy during
trade with potentially infested host material it is nec-
70 essary to ensure that the product has been exposed to
temperatures at or below the upper threshold for at
60 least the minimum exposure period. Whereas temper-
ature ßuctuations are minimized during the validating
50 Replicate 1 experimental work, under conditions of practical ap-
Replicate 2
plication to a large bulk of host material (such as
40 export shipment of fruit), temperature ßuctuations
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
are far greater than under experimental conditions
Log 10 days
(Tanner and Amos 2003). Consequently, practical
Fig. 2. Mortality of third instars in oranges for both rep- product treatment occurs at temperatures consider-
licates of phase 3 after applying AbbottÕs correction for the ably below the upper threshold to avoid exceeding this
period in days expressed as log10. threshold and invalidating the treatmentÕs application.
Under practical shipping conditions the maximum
fruit pulp temperature sensors are not permitted to
signiÞcantly lower in oranges than in these other hosts.
exceed a temperature of at least 0.5⬚C below the upper
This explains why the mortality between egg hatch
threshold, and delivery air temperature is generally set
and third instar in the controls was usually close to 80%
at a further 0.5 to 1⬚C below this target temperature
(Table 2), even though steps were taken to ensure that
(i.e., 1 to 1.5⬚C below the upper threshold; PPECB
only eggs of good viability were used for inoculation.
This result is not very different to C. capitata in or- 2009). Therefore, from a phytosanitary security per-
anges where mortality between egg hatch and second spective, it is generally safe to set the maximum pro-
instar has been shown to be 72% (Grout et al. 2011). tocol temperature above the mean of the treatment
Other studies (Hill et al. 1988, Jessup et al. 1993) did condition maintained in the supporting experiments.
not determine how many eggs were oviposited in fruit Using the mean of the average hourly maximum probe
by C. capitata, so they could not estimate mortality readings during the experiment provides a conserva-
based on egg numbers, but Sproul (1976) recovered tive measure for the upper threshold to be deÞned in
⬇20 C. capitata pupae per ÔGranny SmithÕ apple after a practical treatment protocol.
injecting 150 Ð200 eggs per apple, which results in a Direct comparison between these results and the
mortality of at least 87%. USDAÐAPHIS treatment protocol of T107-a for C.
The time taken to get the fruit pulp temperature capitata and C. rosa is difÞcult, because trial proce-
down from ⬇26⬚C to 0.5⬚C took longer than 48 h in two dures deployed will not have been the same and the
of the three replicates in phase 4 (Fig. 3), but this is calculations used to convert previous trial conditions
not considered unusual in comparison with commer- into the T107-a treatment protocol are unknown.
cial situations where large consignments of fruit in Nonetheless, considering that there were a few sur-
cartons need to be cooled to similar temperatures. If viving larvae in replicate two of phase 4 at a treatment
a cold treatment schedule was based on a much midpoint of 1.1⬚C for 16 d, it seems that the T107-a
shorter precooling period, its relevance to what would protocol (1.11⬚C for 14 d or 1.67⬚C for 16 dÑ being the
happen in practice could be questioned. upper threshold temperatures, as opposed to midpoint
The above-mentioned results and experimental treatment temperatures) might not always provide
treatment conditions provide the basis for establishing adequate assurance of efÞcacy (when measuring lar-
a treatment protocol for practical use in phytosanitary val survival), depending on how closely the practical
regulation of trade with B. invadens host material such application of the treatment is allowed to match the

Table 5. Phase 4: efficacy of 1.1°C for 16 d in two replicates and the efficacy of 0.5°C for 16 d in three replicates against B. invadens
third instars, with mean fruit pulp temperatures

Totals from two replicates Totals from three replicates


Statistic
Control at 28⬚C 16 d at 1.1⬚C Control at 28⬚C 16 d at 0.5⬚C
No. fruit 1,025 4,108 1,649 7,379
No. live larvae 9,619 3 11,059 0
Total larvae 10,075 40,153 12,112 65,752
Larval mortality (%) 4.5 99.9925a 8.1 100.0
Mean of hourly avg. temp, ⬚C (SEM) 1.1 (0.0) 0.5 (0.0)
Mean of hourly max. temp, ⬚C (SEM) 1.4 (0.0) 0.9 (0.0)
Mean of hourly min. temp, ⬚C (SEM) 0.8 (0.1) 0.2 (0.0)

a
Probit-9 requirement is 99.9968% mortality.
August 2011 GROUT ET AL.: B. invadens COLD SUSCEPTIBILITY IN ORANGES 1187

these results support the establishment of the follow-


25 Mean hourly
Max hourly
ing phytosanitary treatment protocol for B. invadens
Min hourly disinfestation in citrus fruit: fruit pulp to be main-
20
tained at temperatures of 0.9⬚C or lower for 16 con-
a secutive days.
15

10

Acknowledgments
5
We thank Mike Hennessey for advice and anonymous
0
reviewers for helpful comments, numerous casual laborers
0 48 96 144 192 240 288 336 384 432 for evaluating the many treatments and those responsible for
maintaining the B. invadens culture at ICIPE. This research
25 Mean hourly
was funded in part by the Citrus Growers Association of
Max hourly Southern Africa and support from the ICIPE core funds.
Min hourly
20
Temperature (C)

b
15 References Cited
10
Abbott, W. S. 1925. A method of computing the effective-
ness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 18: 265Ð267.
5
[APHIS] U.S. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
2010. U.S. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service,
0
Treatment manual 07/2010-47 Chapter 5-2. T100-Sched-
0 48 96 144 192 240 288 336 384 432 ules for Fruit, Nuts, and Vegetables. (http://www.aphis.
usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/ports/treatment.
Mean hourly
shtml).
25
Max hourly Borrell-Fontelles, J. P., and N. Schmidt. 2005. Regulation
Min hourly (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the
20
Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels
c of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal
15
origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC. Of-
Þcial J. European Union L70: 1Ð16.
10
Drew, R., K. Tsuruta, and I. White. 2005. A new species of
pest fruit ßy (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) from Sri
5
Lanka and Africa. Afr. Entomol. 13: 149 Ð154.
Ekesi, S., and E. Muchugu. 2007. Tephritid fruit ßies in Af-
0
0 48 96 144 192 240 288 336 384 432
rica Ð fact sheets of some economically important species,
B-10. In S. Ekesi and M. K. Billah (eds.), A Þeld guide to
Hours
the management of economically important tephritid
Fig. 3. Hourly maximum (dotted line), hourly minimum fruit ßies in Africa, 2nd ed. EICIPE Science Press, Nairobi,
(dashed line), and hourly mean (solid line) temperatures of Kenya.
fruit pulp in three replicates during cold treatment. Long- Ekesi, S., M. K. Billah, P. W. Nderitu, S. A. Lux, and I.
term mean temperatures were as follows. (a) Replicate 1: Rwomushana. 2009. Evidence for competitive displace-
mean of hourly averages, 0.5⬚C; mean of hourly minima, ment of the mango fruit ßy, Ceratitis cosyra by the inva-
0.1⬚C; mean of hourly maxima, 0.9⬚C. (b) Replicate 2: mean sive fruit ßy, Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae)
of hourly averages, 0.5⬚C; mean of hourly minima, 0.2⬚C; on mango and mechanisms contributing to the displace-
mean of hourly maxima, 0.9⬚C. (c) Replicate 3: mean of ment. J. Econ. Entomol. 102: 981Ð991.
hourly averages, 0.5⬚C; mean of hourly minima, 0.3⬚C; mean Ekesi, S., P. W. Nderitu, and C. L. Chang. 2007. Adaptation
of hourly maxima, 0.8⬚C. to and small-scale rearing of invasive fruit ßy Bactrocera
invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae) on artiÞcial diet. Ann.
Entomol. Soc. Am. 100: 562Ð567.
Ekesi, S., P. W. Nderitu, and I. Rwomushana. 2006. Field
upper threshold temperatures stipulated in the pro- infestation, life history and demographic parameters of
tocol. When considering that the objective of such a the fruit ßy Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae) in
treatment is to prevent the treated commodity from Africa. Bull. Entomol. Res. 96: 379 Ð386.
providing a pathway for the establishment of the or- [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United
ganism in new areas, evaluating larval survival is a Nations. 2006. Citrus fruit: fresh and processedÑannual
conservative estimate of the treatmentÕs efÞcacy in statistics 2006. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the
preventing emergence of fertile adults. Therefore, United Nations. (http://www.fao.org/es/esc/common/
T107-a may still provide adequate phytosanitary se- ecg/243/en/bull2006.pdf).
curity but could complicate regulatory application if Finney, D. J. 1971. Probit analysis. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
low levels of larval survival were to be detected during Follett, P. A., and L. G. Neven. 2006. Current trends in
posttreatment inspection. quarantine entomology. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51: 359 Ð
Taking the above-mentioned information into con- 385.
sideration, and that the mean of the average hourly Grout, T. G., P. R. Stephen, J. H. Daneel, and V. Hattingh.
maximum probe readings was 0.9⬚C, we conclude that 2011. Cold disinfestation of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera:
1188 JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 104, no. 4

Tephritidae) in oranges using a larval endpoint. J. Econ. ment in mango orchards in the natural area of Niayes in
Entomol. 104: 1174 Ð1179. Senegal. Pest Manag. Hortic. Ecosyst. 14: 1Ð 8.
Grout, T. G., and K. Stoltz. 2007. Developmental rates at [PPECB] Perishable Products Export Control Board. 2009.
constant temperatures of three economically important Procedures for in-transit cold treatment citrus fruit ship-
Ceratitis spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) from southern Af- ments to Japan HP39 Rev. 01. Perishable Products Export
rica. Environ. Entomol. 36: 1310 Ð1317. Control Board, Cape Town, South Africa.
Hallman, G. J., S. W. Myers, A. J. Jessup, and A. Islam. 2011. Rwomushana, I., S. Ekesi, I. Gordon, and C.K.P.O. Ogol.
Comparison of in vitro heat and cold tolerances of the 2008a. Host plants and host plant preference studies for
new invasive species Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Te- Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Kenya, a
phritidae) with three known tephritids. J. Econ. Entomol. new invasive fruit ßy species in Africa. Ann. Entomol. Soc.
104: 21Ð25. Am. 101: 331Ð340.
Hill, A. R., C. J. Rigney, and A. N. Sproul. 1988. Cold storage Rwomushana, I., S. Ekesi, C.K.P.O. Ogol, and I. Gordon.
of oranges as a disinfestation treatment against the fruit 2008b. Effect of temperature on development and sur-
ßies Dacus tryoni (Froggatt) and Ceratitis capitata (Wie- vival of immature stages of Bactrocera invadens (Diptera:
demann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 81: Tephritidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 132: 832Ð 839.
257Ð260. Sproul, A. M. 1976. Disinfestation of Western Australian
[IPPC]. 2010. International Plant Protection Convention: Granny Smith apples by cold treatment against the egg
South Africa. (https://www.ippc.int/index.php?id⫽ and larval stages of the Mediterranean fruit ßy, Ceratitis
nppoZAF). capitata (Wiedemann). Austral. J. Exp. Agric. Anim.
Jessup, A. J., C.P.F. De Lima, C. W. Hood, R. F. Sloggett, A. M. Husb. 16: 280 Ð285.
Harris, and M. Beckingham. 1993. Quarantine disinfes- Tanner, D. J., and N. D. Amos. 2003. Temperature variabil-
tation of lemons against Bactrocera tryoni and Ceratitis ity during shipment of fresh produce. Acta Hortic. 599:
capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) using cold storage. J. 193Ð203.
Econ. Entomol. 86: 798 Ð 802. van Ark, H. 1995. Introduction to the analysis of quantal
Lux, S. A., R. S. Copeland, I. M. White, A. Manrakhan, and response. Agricultural Research Council, Agrimetrics In-
M. K. Billah. 2003. A new invasive fruit ßy species from stitute, Pretoria, South Africa.
the Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) group detected in East Ware, A. B., B. Tate, J.-H. Daneel, P. Stephen, and R. Beck.
Africa. Insect Sci. Appl. 23: 355Ð361. 2006. Sensitivity of Mediterranean fruit ßy eggs and lar-
Mwatawala, M., M. De Meyer, R. H. Makundi, and A. P. vae in lemons, grapefruit and oranges to cold treatment
Maerere. 2006. Seasonality and host utilization of the of 1⬚C, pp. 100 Ð106. In: CRI Group Annual Research
invasive fruit ßy, Bactrocera invadens (Dipt., Tephritidae) Report for 2005. Citrus Research International, Nelspruit,
in central Tanzania. J. Appl. Entomol. 130: 530 Ð537. South Africa.
Ndiaye, M., E. O. Dieng, and G. Delhove. 2008. Population
dynamics and on-farm fruit ßy integrated pest manage- Received 2 December 2010; accepted 11 May 2011.

You might also like