Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Author(s): W. A. L. Blyth
Source: British Journal of Educational Studies , Jun., 1976, Vol. 24, No. 2 (Jun., 1976),
pp. 109-126
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. on behalf of the Society for Educational Studies
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3120379?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Society for Educational Studies and Taylor & Francis, Ltd. are collaborating with JSTOR to
digitize, preserve and extend access to British Journal of Educational Studies
I. INTRODUCTION
At leastpredominant.
in Western education,
Whether thought isthe verbal
regarded elements
as prior to words,have always been
or words to thought, their joint significance has never been in
doubt. Yet alongside verbal education there has always been some kind
of awareness that an education based solely on words is defective and
perhaps undesirable. Periodically, there have been calls for an emphasis
on something else: Nature, things, art, movement, or other people.
Bookish education has been persistent, but not unchallenged. Even the
bookworms who sustain it would agree that Society needs not bookworms
but balanced people, people who can do and feel and love as well as think.
In the present century, there has been a further reaction against an
over-emphasis on an education that has come to be regarded, often super-
ficially, as not only bookish but also snobbish. Yet paradoxically this has
also been a century in which knowledge about the verbal aspects of educa-
tion has consistently outpaced knowledge about its other features. Indeed,
when a writer such as Elliot Eisner' speaks out boldly about the inade-
quacy of some aspect of current educational discourse in its application to
non-verbal education-in his case, specific behavioural objectives in their
relation to education in the arts-there is still a tendency for others to
react with mild embarrassment, acknowledging that this is by common
consent an important matter, but admitting that it has been consistently
under-studied. However, recently there have been new developments,
especially in the study of non-verbal communication, which place non-
verbal education in a series of new perspectives.
The purpose of this article is to indicate, first, what are the non-verbal
elements in education, next, to indicate some ways in which these new
perspectives have been developed, and finally to suggest some ways in
which a coherent programme of study, practice and research could be
developed.
Of course, this is an ambitious programme for a single article. There-
fore, what follows must be regarded as a sketch, rather than a diligent
and exhaustive survey.
However, it is not a quick, improvised sketch. It represents the outcome
o09
NS CI/ -
Ad,\ Os) ~
Vol G n-er
-Aese 0A
C ,/O f0,7
Edcaio Eucto/io
A B
Verbal Non-Verbal
studies which can lift this whole subject from its obvious
appeal to the level of a more exact science. Meanwhile Ar
University of Oxford20 and others such as Livesley and Bro
extended the range of such studies to include the perception b
others, and the interpretation of their gaze and gestures. Sy
one of our own group, has begun to explore further the relev
studies for teachers." (Incidentally, their fascination can be
effects. Catching oneself for the twentieth time crossing on
cocking one's head on one side, one can be tempted to think th
ignorance of kinesics can be a kind of bliss.)
REFERENCES
124
126