Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación

Course: Operational Measures for Ecoefficiency
Code: 358049

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Phase 1 Conceptualization

1. Activity Description
Type of Activity: Collaborative
Evaluation Moment: Initial
Highest Activity Score: 25 points
The activity starts on: Monday, February The activity ends on: Sunday, February
05, 2022 20, 2022
With this activity, the following learning outcomes are expected:

Recognize in the national and international framework the concepts related to Eco-
efficiency, what is the importance, relevance and relationship between the
development of the company and the economic model.

The activity consists of:

Recognize in the national and international framework the concepts related to Eco-
efficiency, what is the importance, relevance and relationship between the
development of the company and the economic model.

Students should then read or/and view the contents and bibliographic references of
unit 1

Once the information for each of the proposed references has been inferred, students
should develop an infographic containing.

• Definition of Ecoefficiency
• Ecoefficiency objectives
• Business Ecoefficiency Models
• Actions taken by companies
• Importance of Ecoefficiency in Companies

1
Finally, the presentation of the document must comply with the aPA https standards:

• Cover
• Infographic
• Conclusion (1 paragraph of 5 lines)
• Bibliographic references
• PDF file format

keep in mind for the development of the activity:

In the Initial Information Environment, you must:

Consult the Academic Agenda, the presentation of the course and information related
to the information forums and the teaching accompaniment.

In the Learning Environment, you must:

Consult the Syllabus, the contents and bibliographic references Unit 1 .

Participate in the discussion forum by socializing a Skype user and phone number, in
order to create a group by WhatsApp or Skype for assertive communication with the
team.

The intervention in the discussion forum of each of the students should be given within
a cordial language (management of the netiquetas) between peers and should take
into account the following aspects within the forum:

The spaces in the forum are exclusive to raise doubts and concerns, to ensure that it
does so in a timely manner, that is, specifying the topic on which it requires clarity.

You ask like"Is my job okay? It does not allow such objectivity, as the student is
responsible for collecting both the guidance, the tutor's recommendations, the
answers to their questions and performing the work under those conditions, or
verifying that they are met.

In the Evaluation Environment, you must:

Upload the document in PDF format.

2
Individual Work Evidences:
No individual evidence is required in this activity.

Collaborative Evidences:
The collaborative evidence to be submitted is:

Document in PDF file that complies with standards APA

https://unadista.wixsite.com/normasapa include

• Cover
• Infographic: Definition of Eco-Efficiency, Eco-Efficiency Goals, Business Eco-
Efficiency Models, Actions Taken by Companies, Importance of Eco-Efficiency in
Companies
• Conclusion (1 paragraph of 5 lines)
• Bibliographic references

2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit.

For Collaborative evidence, consider the following:

• All members of the group must participate with their contributions in the
development of the activity.

• In each group, a single member will be chosen to submit the requested product
in the environment indicated by the teacher.

• Before submitting the requested product, students should check that it meets all
the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.

• Only the members of the group that participated with contributions during the
time assigned for the activity should be included as authors of the submitted
product.

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA Format.

3
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found on the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) "Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference" and
paragraph f) "To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University ". (Acuerdo 029 -
13 de diciembre de 2013, Artículo 99).

The academic penalties students will face are:

a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

3. Evaluation Rubric

Type of Activity: Collaborative

Evaluation Moment: Initial
Highest Activity Score: 25 points
First Evaluation High Level: The infographic has an excellent structure,
Criterion: analysis and consistency, as well as sets out what is requested
in the guide
Structure, analysis
and coherence in If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points
the presentation of and 10 points
the Infographic
Average Level: Although the flow infographic has a base
This criterion structure, it lacks some requested elements
represents 15
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points
of 25 points of and 5 points
the activity.

4
 Low level: The infographic does not have the elements and
criteria requested in the guide
If your work is at this level, you can get between 4
points and 0 points
Second Evaluation High Level: The document presents an excellent structure,
Criterion: presentation and complies with the required format. The
conclusions are consistent with the inferred reading.
Format, conclusions Appointment and referral handling is satisfactory and APA
and bibliographic standards apply
references.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 10 points
This criterion and 7 points
represents 10
points of the total Average Level: Although the report has a basic structure, it
of 25 points of lacks some elements requested in the guide
the activity.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 6 points
and 4 points

Low level: The report does not respond to the requested

structure and formats and has a poor presentation. The
conclusions are not consistent with reading. The use of
appointments and referrals is not handled properly. The
document presents a textual copy of other authors

If your work is at this level, you can get between 3

points and 0 points