You are on page 1of 17

Plant Ecology (2006) 182:137 –152  Springer 2005

DOI 10.1007/s11258-005-9023-1

Outdoor studies on the effects of solar UV-B on bryophytes: overview and


methodology

Peter Boelen1,*, M. Karin de Boer2, Nancy V. J. de Bakker1 and Jelte Rozema1


1
Institute of Ecological Science, Department of Systems Ecology, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije
Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Marine Biology,
University of Groningen, 14, 9750 AA, Haren, The Netherlands; *Author for correspondence (e-mail:
peter.boelen@ecology.falw.vu.nl; phone: +31 20 5987048; fax: +31 20 5987123)

Received 1 September 2004; accepted in revised form 15 December 2004

Key words: Antarctic, Arctic, Bryophytes, Chorisodontium aciplyllum, Cyclobutane Pyrimidine dimers,
DNA damage, mosses, Ozone depletion, Polytrichum strictum, Sanionia uncinata, Terrestrial polar eco-
systems, Ultraviolet-B radiation, UV-B exposure systems, UVBR, Warnstorfia sarmentosa

Abstract

In this review all recent field studies on the effects of UV-B radiation on bryophytes are discussed. In
most of the studies fluorescent UV-B tubes are used to expose the vegetation to enhanced levels of UV-
B radiation to simulate stratospheric ozone depletion. Other studies use screens to filter the UV-B part
of the solar spectrum, thereby comparing ambient levels of UV-B with reduced UV-B levels, or analyse
effects of natural variations in UV-B arising from stratospheric ozone depletion. Nearly all studies show
that mosses are well adapted to ambient levels of UV-B radiation since UV-B hardly affects growth
parameters. In contrast with outdoor studies on higher plants, soluble UV-B absorbing compounds in
bryophytes are typically not induced by enhanced levels of UV-B radiation. A few studies have
demonstrated that UV-B radiation can influence plant morphology, photosynthetic capacity, photo-
synthetic pigments or levels of DNA damage. However, there is only a limited number of outdoor
studies presented in the literature. More additional, especially long-term, experiments are needed to
provide better data for statistical meta-analyses. A mini UV-B supplementation system is described,
especially designed to study effects of UV-B radiation at remote field locations under harsh conditions,
and which is therefore suited to perform long-term studies in the Arctic or Antarctic. The first results
are presented from a long-term UV-B supplementation experiment at Signy Island in the Maritime
Antarctic.

Introduction 280 –315 nm) at ground level. Since the 1970s


springtime stratospheric ozone over the Antarctic
Stratospheric ozone depletion occurs mainly over has decreased up to 50%, leading to increases in
polar regions during spring. A relatively small biologically effective UV-B radiation of more than
decrease in stratospheric ozone concentration, 130% (Madronich et al. 1998; WMO 2003).
owing to anthropogenic emissions of chloroflu- Many studies on the effects of enhanced UV-B
orocarbons (CFCs), will strongly affect the inten- radiation have focused on higher plants. However,
sity of ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B radiation: Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems are dominated by
138

cryptogams, with mosses predominating in the DNA extraction and quantification of cyclobu-
moister, more sheltered habitats and lichens in the tane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) caused by expo-
more arid and windswept situations (Fenton sure to solar UV-B radiation (Caldwell et al.
1982). There are approximately 75 moss species 1998).
but relatively few achieve dominance (Fowbert In this paper we give an overview of recent field
1996) and higher plants are poorly represented in studies on the effects of altered levels of UV-B
the Antarctic. radiation on bryophytes. The experimental meth-
Until several years ago relatively little was known ods that have been used to manipulate levels of
about the effects of UV-B radiation on mosses. This UV-B radiation in the field are discussed. Fur-
is remarkable because beforehand it was assumed thermore, a mini UV-B supplementation system,
that the majority of bryophytes were particularly especially designed to study the effects of enhanced
susceptible to UV-B radiation and that they were UV-B radiation on terrestrial vegetation at remote
more sensitive to UV-B radiation than higher field locations, is described. This UV-B supple-
plants (Gehrke 1999). Firstly, most bryophytes mentation system has already been used for two
have (undifferentiated) leaves of only one cell layer consecutive years at Signy Island in the Maritime
thickness and no protective cuticle and epidermis to Antarctic where natural vegetation (four moss
attenuate UV-B. Secondly, since leaf water content species and the higher plant Deschampsia
in bryophytes depends on air humidity, high levels antarctica) is exposed to enhanced UV-B radiation
of solar radiation can lead to physiological in a long-term experiment.
inactivity, which may hinder processes such as
DNA photorepair. Finally, since most bryo-
phytes are rootless, mosses are not able to Outdoor studies on the effects of solar UV-B on
compensate for aboveground stresses, such as bryophytes: an overview
UV-B radiation, through the belowground stor-
age of assimilates. UV-B radiation can have many direct and indirect
Studies on the effects of UV-B radiation on effects on organisms. UV-B radiation induces
mosses are not only important to predict the damage to essential molecules like proteins, pig-
effects of future ozone depletion scenarios but are ments and DNA. This damage can influence
also essential for studies that attempt to recon- important cellular processes such as nutrient up-
struct historical ozone levels. Rozema et al. take, DNA transcription and replication or pho-
(2001b) suggested that polyphenolic compounds tosynthesis, which eventually can lead to decreased
in pollen and spores that have been incorporated growth rate or impaired reproduction (see Rozema
into moss banks may be applied as a new proxy et al. 1997a; Caldwell et al. 1998; Searles et al.
for the reconstruction of historic variation in 2001; Robinson et al. 2003). There are several
solar UV-B levels. In the Antarctic, e.g. at Signy strategies to minimise the deleterious effects of UV-
Island, two species of moss, Chorisodontium aci- B radiation. In higher plants UV-B damage to
phyllum and Polytrichum strictum, form charac- essential molecules is avoided by producing UV-B
teristic peat banks which may be over 2 m deep, absorbing compounds (see Meijkamp et al. 1999;
may cover more than 2500 m2 in area and are as Searles et al. 2001) or by increasing leaf thickness
much as 5000 years old (Fenton 1980). The moss (Bornman and Vogelmann 1991). Another strategy
peat banks consist mainly of the relatively is to utilise repair mechanisms to ameliorate UV-B
uncompacted remains of the two moss species. induced damage.
The mosses become incorporated into the per- Studies on the ecophysiological responses of
mafrost at a depth of 20 to 30 cm. Since most higher plants to UV-B are mainly based on
parts of Antarctic moss peat banks are perma- greenhouse or climate room experiments. In a
nently frozen, these banks may represent a unique meta-analysis of field based studies on higher
archive of historical UV-B levels (Rozema et al. plants, Searles et al. (2001) concluded that the
2001c; 2002). Besides the analysis of UV-B in- accumulation of UV-B absorbing compounds in
duced polyphenolic compounds pollen and spores leaves was the most apparent effect of enhanced
that are incorporated into these moss banks, the UV-B radiation while most morphological and
preservation of frozen moss material may allow photosynthetic parameters were not affected. In
139

contrast to higher plants, most studies on bryo- Photosynthetic activity


phyte responses to UV-B are conducted under
field conditions. These outdoor studies investigat- UV-B radiation can directly or indirectly affect
ing the impact (on growth, morphology, photo- many photosynthetic processes in higher plants
synthetic parameters, UV-B screening pigments such as performance of Photosystem II, the
and DNA damage) of UV-B radiation on bryo- integrity of the thylakoid membrane and enzy-
phytes are summarised in Table 1. All field matic processes in the Calvin Cycle (Bornman
experiments considered here were carried out in 1989; Teramura and Sullivan 1994; Jansen et al.
polar or sub-polar regions. There is a substantial 1998). However, most of these studies have been
variation in the duration of the studies, with some carried out under unrealistic irradiance conditions
performed for 10 h and others for up to 6 years. with low levels of UV-A radiation and/or PAR
Long-term studies are more difficult to maintain (Photosynthetic Active Radiation; 400 –700 nm).
but have the advantage that slow processes, such Field studies, with plants exposed to more realistic
as growth, can be monitored. The majority of the enhanced levels of UV-B radiation, reveal that in
studies have employed UV-B lamps to simulate a most cases photosynthetic performance is not
decrease in stratospheric ozone concentration. In affected (Allen et al. 1998; Searles et al. 2001;
other studies screens were used to reduce solar Dormann and Woodin 2002).
UV-B below ambient levels. These studies can be Although Montiel et al. (1999) observed a
particularly valuable at Antarctic sites with se- decreased photochemical yield in the moss
verely depleted stratospheric ozone concentra- Sanionia uncinata, in most field studies on terres-
tions, but comparisons between UV-B trial bryophytes (i.e. Sanionia uncinata, Bryum ar-
supplementation studies and exclusion experi- genteum, Sphagnum fuscum) photosynthetic
ments should be done with care. Covering plants activity is not affected by reduced or enhanced UV-
with screens can have artefactual effects on tem- B radiation (Gehrke 1998; Green et al. 2000; Hu-
perature and water availability. iskes et al. 2001; Lud et al. 2002, 2003; Newsham
et al. 2002). Also in the majority of the bryophytes
(including three Sphagnum sp.) that have been
Growth, morphology and reproduction investigated, concentrations of chlorophylls are not
influenced by UV-B exposure (Gehrke 1999;
In higher plants many effects of UV-B radiation Searles et al. 1999, 2002; Niemi et al. 2002a, b,
involve morphogenetic changes. Plant morphoge- Newsham et al. 2002; Lud et al. 2003; Newsham
netic parameters that may change are plant height, 2003). However in Sphagnum fuscum, chlorophyll a
leaf area, branching and plant phenology (Rozema concentrations decreased, while chlorophyll levels
et al. 1997a). in Sphagnum balticum increased after exposure to
Only a few field studies relating growth and supplemental UV-B radiation (Gehrke 1998; Niemi
morphology to UV-B exposure and, to our et al. 2002a).
knowledge, no studies relating reproduction have
been reported for bryophytes. Long-term field
studies of Sphagnum sp. showed that UV-B radi- Oxidative damage
ation can influence shoot biomass and length but
that biomass production per area is not affected Although ultraviolet-A radiation (UV-A: 315 –
(Gehrke 1998; Searles et al. 2002; Robson et al. 400 nm) is considered to be the major generator of
2003). Lud et al. (2002) showed that, while shoot intracellular oxidative stress (Pourzand and Tyrrel
biomass and length were unaffected, branching of 1999), several studies have shown that UV-B
the Antarctic moss Sanionia uncinata was reduced radiation exposure can lead to increases in reactive
by reduction of ambient UV-B levels. In a green- oxygen species (ROS) in plants. ROS can react
house experiment where the moss Hylocomium with lipids, pigments, proteins and nucleic acids,
splendens was grown under enhanced UV-B levels leading to inactivation of enzymes, membrane
the phenological development of the moss was damage or oxidative DNA damage (see Day 2001).
accelerated by up to 2 weeks (Johanson et al. Plants cells usually contain enzymatic and non-
1995). enzymatic defences against oxygen toxicity. These
Table 1. Summary of outdoor studies on the effects of UV-B radiation on terrestrial bryophytes.
140
Species Location Duration and Growth morphology Photosynthetic Photosynthetic Membranes UV-B absorbing DNA References
(Latitude type of study and reproduction activity and photopro- compounds damage
/Longitude) tective pigments (UACs)

Andreaea regularis Antarctic 1 month in situ Increased carot- Increased UACs Newsham
Adelaide Island enoids under naturally (2003)
(6734¢ S, under naturally elevated UV-BR
6807¢ W) elevated
UV-BR
Cephaloziella varians Antarctic 1 month in situ No effect of Increased Increased UACs Newsham
Adelaide Island naturally ele- carotenoids under naturally et al. (2002)
(6734¢ S, vated UV-BR under naturally elevated UV-BR
6807¢ W) on Fv/Fm elevated
(maximum UV-BR
quantum yield
of PSII)
Chorisodontium aciphyl- Maritime Ant- 3 –5 weeks of No effect of en- No effect of This paper
lum arctic Signy enhanced hanced enhanced
Island (6042¢ S, UV-BR simu- UV-BR on UV-BR on
4535¢ W) lating 15 and UACs CPD accu-
30% ozone mulation
depletion
Dicranum elongatum Northern Swe- 2 years en- No effect of UV-BR No effect of No effect of Sonesson
den Abisko hanced UV-BR on growth UV-BR on UV-BR on et al. (2002)
(6821¢ N, simulating 20% chlorophyll flavonoids
1849¢ E) ozone reduction
Hylocomium splendens Northern Swe- 3 –6 years Growth reduced No effect on No effect on Gehrke (1999);
den Abisko enhanced UV- after 3 years but chlorophyll and UACs after Phoenix et al.
(6835¢ N, BR simulating enhanced after carotenoid con- 3 years (2001)
1882¢ E) 15% ozone 6 years, shoot mor- centrations after
depletion phology altered after 3 years of en-
3 years hanced
UV-BR
Polytrichum commune Northern Swe- 3 years Annual length incre- Concentration Less UACs after Gehrke (1999)
den Abisko enhanced ment reduced, no ef- of chlorophyll a 3 years of en-
(6835¢ N, UV-BR simu- fect on and carotenoids hanced
1882¢ E) lating 15% biomass, shoot mor- decreased, no UV-BR
ozone depletion phology altered effect on chlo-
rophyll b
concentration
Polytrichum strictum Maritime Ant- 3 –5 weeks of No effect of en- No effect of This paper
arctic Signy Is- enhanced UV- hanced enhanced
land (6042¢ S, BR simulating UV-BR on UV-BR on
4535¢ W) 15 and 30% UACs CPD accu-
ozone depletion mulation
Sanionia uncinata Maritime Ant- 3 –5 weeks of No effect of en- No effect of This paper
arctic Signy Is- enhanced UV- hanced enhanced
land (6042¢ S, BR simulating UV-BR on UV-BR on
4535¢ W) 15 and 30% UACs CPD accu-
ozone depletion mulation
Antarctic Léo- 3 –4 weeks No effect on Huiskes et al.
nie Island screening study PSII quantum (2001)
(6735¢ S, yield
6820¢ W)
Antarctic Léo- 2 years screen- No effect on biomass Lud et al. (2002)
nie Island ing study or length growth, less
(6735¢ S, branching under re-
6820¢ W) duced UV-BR
Antarctic Léo- 2 days of en- No effect on ac- No effect of DNA dam- Lud et al. (2002)
nie Island hanced UV-BR tual and maxi- UV-BR on age in-
(6735¢ S, (8.4 kJ mum quantum chlorophyll creased un-
6820¢ W) m)2 day)1, yield of PSII, no der en-
weighted with effect on photo- hanced UV-
Setlow, norma- synthetic gas BR
lised at 300 nm) exchange
Arctic Ny-Ales- 2 days of en- No effect on ac- No effect of DNA dam- Lud et al. (2002)
und, Svalbard hanced UV-BR tual and maxi- UV-BR on age in-
(7855¢ N, (8.4 kJ mum quantum chlorophyll creased un-
1156¢ E) m)2 day)1, yield of PSII der en-
weighted with hanced UV-
Setlow, norma- BR
lised at 300 nm)
Antarctic Léo- 3 short-term No effect on ac- No effect on Lud et al. (2003)
nie Island screening stud- tual and maxi- chlorophyll
(6735¢ S, ies mum quantum concentrations
6820¢ W) yield of PSII, no
effect on photo-
synthetic gas
exchange
Antarctic Léo- 10 h of en- No effect on No effect of en- DNA dam- Lud et al. (2003)
nie Island hanced UV-BR chlorophyll and hanced UV-BR age in-
(6735¢ S, (in total 8.7 kJ carotenoid con- on UACs creased un-
6820¢ W) m)2, weighted centrations der en-
with Setlow, hanced UV-
normalised at BR
300 nm)
Antarctic A- 7 days of en- PSII quantum Montiel et al.
delaide Island hanced UV-BR yield reduced (1999)
(6734¢ S, (30% of back- under enhanced
6807¢ W) ground solar UV-BR com-
levels, no UV-A pared to ambi-
control) and ent and reduced
screening study UV-BR
141
Table 1. Continued.
142
Species Location Duration and Growth morphology Photosynthetic Photosynthetic Membranes UV-B absorbing DNA References
(Latitude type of study and reproduction activity and photopro- compounds damage
/Longitude) tective pigments (UACs)

Antarctic 1 month in situ No effect of Increased carot- Increased UACs Newsham et al.
Adelaide Island naturally enoids under under naturally (2002)
(6734¢ S, elevated naturally ele- elevated UV-BR
6807¢ W) UV-BR on Fv/ vated UV-BR
Fm (maximum
quantum yield
of PSII)
Sphagnum angustifolium Central Finland 14 weeks of No effect of UV-BR No effect on Membrane No effect of en- Niemi et al.
Kuopio enhanced on capitulum chlorophyll and leakage of hanced (2002b)
(6213¢ N, UV-BR simu- or stem dry mass carotenoid con- Mg and Ca UV-BR on
2735¢ E) lating 30% centrations after after UACs
ozone depletion 14 weeks of en- 6 weeks
hanced UV-BR exposure to
enhanced
UV-BR, No
effect of
UV-BR on
membrane
permeabil-
ity after
12 weeks
exposure
Sphagnum balticum Central Finland 14 weeks of No effect of UV-BR Increase of Increase of No effect of en- Niemi et al.
Kuopio enhanced on capitulum chlorophyll a, membrane hanced (2002a)
(6213¢ N, UV-BR simu- or stem dry mass chlorophyll b conductivity UV-BR on
2735¢ E) lating 30% and carotenoids UACs
ozone depletion, after exposure
no UV-A con- to enhanced
trol UV-BR
Sphagnum fuscum Northern Swe- 2 years of en- Decrease in annual Maximum net Chlorophyll a No effect of en- Gehrke (1998)
den Abisko hanced UV-BR length increment, dry photosynthesis and carotenoids hanced UV-BR
(6835¢ N, simulating 15% mass per unit length (NPmax) in- decreased under on UACs
1882¢ E) ozone depletion increased, no effect on creased under enhanced UV-
production of biomass UV-BR when BR, no effect on
per area calculated per chlorophyll b
unit chloro-
phyll, no effect
on NPmax on a
dry-mass basis,
dark respiration
decreased
Sphagnum fuscum Northern Swe- 2 years No effect of UV-B R No effect of No effect of Sonesson et al.
den Abisko enhanced on growth UV-BR on UV-BR on (2002)
(6821¢ N, UV-BR chlorophyll flavonoids
1849¢ E)
Sphagnum magellanicum Central Finland 14 weeks of en- No effect on Membrane Niemi et al.
Kuopio hanced UV-BR chlorophyll and leakage of Mg (2002b)
(6213¢ N, simulating 30% carotenoid con- after 12 weeks
2735¢ E) ozone depletion centrations after exposure to en-
14 weeks of en- hanced UV-BR
hanced UV-BR
Southern 3 –6 years Height growth de- No effect on No effect on Searles et al.
Argentina Tier- screening study creased but capitu- chlorophyll and UACs (1999, 2002);
ra del Fuego (near ambient lum density increased carotenoids Robson et al.
(5451¢ S, and reduced under near-ambient (2003)
6836¢ W) UV-BR) conditions, no effect
on production of
biomass per area
Sphagnum papillosum Central Finland 14 weeks of No effect on Increase of No effect of en- Niemi et al.
Kuopio enhanced chlorophyll and membrane con- hanced (2002a)
(6213¢ N, UV-BR simu- carotenoid con- ductivity, leak- UV-BR on
2735¢ E) lating 30% centrations after age of Mg and UACs
ozone depletion, 14 weeks of en- Ca
no UV-A con- hanced UV-BR
trol
Central Finland 14 weeks of No effect on No effect of No effect of en- Niemi et al.
Kuopio enhanced chlorophyll and UV-BR on hanced (2002b)
(6213¢ N, UV-BR simu- carotenoid con- membrane per- UV-BR on
2735¢ E) lating 30% centrations after meability after UACs
ozone depletion 14 weeks of en- 12 weeks expo-
hanced UV-BR sure
Warnstorfia sarmentosa Maritime Ant- 3 –5 weeks of No effect of en- No effect of This paper
arctic Signy Is- enhanced hanced enhanced
land (6042¢ S, UV-BR simu- UV-BR on UV-BR on
4535¢ W) lating 15 and UACs CPD accu-
30% ozone mulation
depletion
143
144

so-called antioxidants can remove, neutralise or (Barsig et al. 1998; Gehrke 1998; Markham et al.
scavenge ROS in cells, thereby protecting cellular 1998; Gehrke 1999; Niemi et al. 2002b; Searles
components from oxidative damage. Enzymatic et al. 2002; Lud et al. 2003). In an outdoor UV-B
antioxidants are superoxide dismutase (SOD), supplementation experiment (see below) at Signy
catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (AP) dehy- Island (Maritime Antarctic) soluble UV-B absorb-
droascorbate reductase and glutathione reductase. ing compounds in four moss species (Sanionia
Non-enzymatic defences are carotenoids, flavo- uncinata, Chorisodontium aciphyllum, Warnstorfia
noids, ascorbate and glutathione (Dai et al. 1997; sarmentosa and Polytrichum strictum) were not
Jansen et al. 1998). induced by enhanced levels of UV-B radiation
Very little is known about UV-induced (Figure 1). However, studies by Newsham et al.
oxidative stress in bryophytes. Niemi et al. (2002) and Newsham (2003) suggested that in
(2002a, b) showed that enhanced UV-B levels Antarctic bryophytes UV-B absorbing pigments
could lead to increased membrane permeability in may be induced within 24 h under natural ele-
Sphagnum spp. Although the authors did not vated irradiances of UV-B arising from ozone
mention this, an increase in membrane perme- depletion. In addition, Markham et al. (1990)
ability could be the result of oxidative stress (Dai found that flavonoid concentrations in herbar-
et al. 1997). ium specimens of Bryum argenteum were corre-
In a growth chamber experiment, Markham lated with historical ozone levels for the period
et al. (1998) studied the effects of varying UV-B 1960 –1990.
levels on the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha.
They found a strong correlation between increasing
UV-B levels and the ratio of two individual flavo- UV-B induced DNA damage and repair
noids. Since the total UV-B screening effectiveness
of the flavonoids was not altered, they suggested UV-B radiation can cause dimerization of DNA
that an increase of one particular flavonoid bases, leading to the formation of photoproducts
(a luteolin glycoside) improved the level of like cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and
antioxidant defence. pyrimidine (6 –4) pyrimidone photoproducts. Cells
need to repair this damage before they can proceed
with DNA transcription or replication. There are
UV-B-absorbing compounds two main pathways to repair dimerised pyrimi-
dines: excision (dark) repair and photodependent
Many plants can adapt to high UV-B fluxes by the repair (Sancar and Sancar 1988).
production of secondary metabolites which absorb Lud et al. (2002, 2003) studied the effects of
UV-B radiation. In a meta-analysis of 62 outdoor ambient and enhanced levels of UV-B radiation on
irradiation studies (no studies of moss species the bipolar bryophyte Sanionia uncinata. They
included), Searles et al. (2001) concluded that the concluded that ambient summer levels of UV-B
accumulation of UV-B absorbing compounds in radiation did not induce significant levels of DNA
leaves was the most apparent effect of enhanced damage. However, DNA damage, measured as
UV-B radiation. UV-B radiation stimulates the CPDs, clearly increased as a result of artificially
production of phenylalanine ammonium lysase enhanced UV-B radiation. DNA damaged during
(PAL) and other key enzymes of the phenylpropa- the day was repaired during the (non dark) night.
noid pathway (Rozema et al. 1997a; Meijkamp In 2003 an outdoor UV-B supplementation
et al. 1999). PAL catalyses the formation of phen- experiment (see below) was started at Signy Island
ylalanine to trans-cinnamic acid, which leads to the in the Maritime Antarctic. The effects of UV-B
formation of complex phenolic compounds such as radiation on four moss species (Sanionia uncinata,
flavonoids, tannins and lignin. Although flavo- Chorisodontium aciphyllum, Warnstorfia sarmen-
noids can be found in many (but not all) moss tosa and Polytrichum strictum) was investigated
species (Markham 1990), most studies show that (Figure 2). Levels of DNA damage were low
UV-B absorbing compounds in bryophytes were but comparable with concentrations found by
not enhanced by supplemental levels of UV-B Lud et al. (2002, 2003). A significant difference
radiation applied from fluorescent UV lamps between mosses exposed to enhanced levels of
145

35 35
Sanionia uncinata Warnstorfia sarmentosa
30 30

Absorbance (280 - 320 nm) . mg-1


Absorbance (280 - 320 nm) . mg-1

25 25

20 20

15 15

10 10

5 5

0 0
C UVA UVB1 UVB2 C UVA UVB1 UVB2

35 35
Chorisodontium aciphyllum Polytrichum strictum
30 30
-1
Absorbance (280 - 320 nm) . mg

-1
Absorbance (280 - 320 nm) . mg
25 25

20 20

15 15

10 10

5 5

0 0
C UVA UVB1 UVB2 C UVA UVB1 UVB2

Figure 1. Soluble UV-B absorbing compounds (acidified methanol extracts, see Rozema et al. 2001b) in four moss species from
outdoor experiments at Signy Island (6042¢ S, 4535¢ W) after 5 weeks (2 February until 6 March 2003) of exposure to UV-B radiation
simulating 15 or 30% ozone depletion (C=ambient control, UVA=UV-A control, UVB1=15% ozone depletion, UVB2, 30% ozone
depletion, error bars represent standard deviation, n=4). Around noon five randomly selected shoots per species per plot (four plots
per treatment) were collected . The top sections (circa 0.5 cm) of air dried shoots were pooled and used for methanol extraction.

UV-B and the controls (ambient UV-B levels) solar radiation leaves the natural relations of
could not be demonstrated. This suggests that the solar spectrum intact and avoids the UV-A
these mosses are well adapted to ambient levels of radiation produced by fluorescent tubes which is
UV-B radiation. thought to perhaps influence plant growth
(Newsham et al. 1996). These studies do not sim-
ulate ozone depletion scenarios but are valuable
Outdoor studies on the effects of solar UV-B and have substantially increased our knowledge of
on bryophytes: methodology the mechanisms behind UV-B effects on plants.
However, screens alter several other abiotic fac-
Outdoor experiments are important tools for tors other than incident radiation, notably tem-
studying changes to vegetation that might occur as perature and water availability (Kennedy 1995).
a result of stratospheric ozone depletion. There Recently, Krizek and Mirecki (2004) showed that
are several methods to manipulate UV-B radiation cellulose diacetate films, used in some UV-exclu-
in the field. In many field studies screens are used sion studies (ambient control), release phytotoxic
to filter the UV-B portion of the solar spectrum compounds.
(Rozema et al. 1997a; Ballare et al. 2001; Lud Newsham et al. (2002) and Newsham (2003)
et al. 2003). In this way ambient solar UV-B levels performed non-manipulative studies at Antarctic
can be compared with reduced levels of solar sites experiencing natural substantial stratospheric
UV-B radiation. Filtration of the UV-B band of ozone depletion. Multiple regression analyses
146

2 2
Sanionia uncinata Warnstorfia sarmentosa
DNA damage (CPD · Mb )

DNA damage (CPD · Mb )


-1

-1
1 1

0 0
C UVA UVB1 UVB2 C UVA UVB1 UVB2

2 2
Chorisodontium aciphyllum Polytrichum strictum
DNA damage (CPD · Mb-1)

DNA damage (CPD · Mb )


-1

1 1

0 0
C UVA UVB1 UVB2 C UVA UVB1 UVB2

Figure 2. DNA damage, expressed as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) per million nucleotides (Boelen et al. 2002) in four moss
species from outdoor experiments at Signy Island after 3 weeks (2 February until 22 February 2003) of exposure to UV-B radiation
simulating 15 or 30% ozone depletion (C=ambient control, UVA=UV-A control, UVB1=15% ozone depletion, UVB2, 30% ozone
depletion, error bars represent standard deviation, n=4). Around noon five randomly selected shoots per species per plot (four plots
per treatment) were collected and immediately frozen at )80 C. The top sections (circa 0.5 cm) of the shoots were pooled and used for
DNA extraction.

indicated that the ratio of UV-B radiation to PAR 1994, Niemi et al. 2002b). The advantage of this
irradiance was the best predictor for concentrations method is that local changes in irradiance, e.g.
of UV-B screening pigments and carotenoids in caused by cloud cover, are accommodated for by
foliage of Antarctic bryophytes. Although this kind the system. However, modulated experiments need
of study gives insight into the effects of enhanced complex and expensive lamp dimming systems and
levels of UV-B radiation arising from ozone sensors to monitor ambient and treatment UV-B
depletion, levels of UV-B depend on local condi- levels. Most of the lamp field experiments that have
tions and cannot be modified to simulate future taken place have used simpler and more robust
ozone depletion scenarios. systems in which lamps have been switched on for a
In UV-B supplementation studies, the vegetation specific period of time centred around solar noon
is exposed to UV-B radiation emitted by fluorescent (e.g. Johanson et al. 1995; Gehrke 1998). In these
lamps, thus simulating a decrease in stratospheric so-called ‘‘square wave’’ systems, exposure times
ozone concentration. In modulated outdoor are calculated with mathematical models (e.g.
supplementation systems ambient UV-B levels are Green 1983) and expressed in terms of a certain
monitored and the output of the UV-B lamps is level of ozone depletion. Switching times are
varied to supply a UV-B dose proportional to adjusted every day or week to follow seasonal
ambient levels (Caldwell et al. 1983, Sullivan et al. patterns of solar radiation. In some experiments the
147

diurnal pattern of exposure has been improved by Germany) which automatically adjust the exposure
switching on alternate lamps in several stages (‘‘step time every week to follow seasonal changes in
wave’’ systems; e.g. Gehrke 1999). Since both sys- natural UV-B radiation (see below).
tems do not compensate for overcast days, ratios of Lamp spectra at sample height (48 cm) were
UV-B:UV-A:PAR can differ between days. measured using an Optronics 752 spectroradiom-
Outdoor UV-B supplementation systems need eter, calibrated against a NIST-traceable OL752-
an electricity supply, which is sometimes not 10E standard lamp (Figure 3). The spatial distri-
available in the field. Besides this, the frames bution of UV-B radiation emitted by the UV-B
that are necessary to support the lamps are lamps was measured using a UVX radiometer
usually large, which can create problems on (UVP Inc, Upland, USA) with a UVX-31 sensor.
steep slopes or places exposed to strong winds. A 25 –30% reduction of radiation levels was
Gehrke et al. (1996), Gehrke (1998) developed a recorded at the edges of each 3035 m plot
small UV-B supplementation system to study (Figure 4a). Since UV-B levels increase strongly as
effects of enhanced UV-B radiation on an om- the distance between the vegetation and the UV-B
brotrophic peatland ecosystem close to the lamp decreases (Figure 4b), the lamp distance or
Abisko Scientific Research Station in northern exposure time have to be adjusted as plant height
Swedish Lapland. increases.
Biologically effective irradiances (BEIs) were
calculated from lamp spectra using Caldwell’s
A mini UV-B supplementation system (1971) generalised plant action spectrum, the
DNA action spectrum from, Setlow (1974) and the
In 2002 the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam started new biological spectral weighting function
several long-term experiments to study the (BSWF) for plant growth from Flint and Caldwell
effects of enhanced UV-B radiation on natural (2003a), all normalised at 300 nm. Lamp output
vegetation. A mini UV-B supplementation system and terminal voltage of the batteries, that are used
was developed to expose vegetation in the Ant- to power the lamps when a regular power supply is
arctic, the Arctic and the Netherlands. A similar not available, are temperature dependent. To
system has been used for short-term experiments estimate the influence of temperature and lamp
in the Antarctic (Rozema et al. 1997b; Huiskes voltage on lamp output, these parameters were
et al. 2001; Rozema et al. 2001a; Lud et al. 2002, investigated in a temperature controlled climate
2003). room. Lamp output was dependent on tempera-
The mini UV-B supplementation system uses ture and tube voltage (Figure 5). In general lamp
mini-fluorescent UV-tubes (Vilber-Lourmat output was lower at lower temperatures and
T-15M, 12 V, 15 W) that can be powered by bat- voltages.
teries when a regular electricity supply is not Since CA foils degrade in time (Steeneken et al.
available. Each lamp frame contains one UV-tube 1995) the BEI under the lamp was recorded over
(44 cm in length , 30 mm diameter, preburned for 40 h. From these data the average lamp output
70 h). Since these lamps are small, and cheap and (average irradiance at sample height during 20 h:
easy to transport, many individual lamps can be Caldwell weighted: 0.079 W m)2, Setlow weigh-
used to increase the number of statistically inde- ted: 0.076 W m)2, weighted with new BSWF
pendent replicates. Our experimental design from Flint & Caldwell: 0.071 W m)2) was calcu-
incorporates two UV-B treatments (UV-B1 and lated. In the field foils were replaced after 20 h
UV-B2) where short-wave UV-C radiation exposure time. The extra UV-B doses required to
(<280 nm) is excluded by cellulose acetate (CA) simulate a 15 or 30% reduction in ozone were
filters placed on UV-B transmitting plexiglass calculated using the irradiance model of Green
underneath each tube, one UV-A control treatment (1983) and computer encoded by Björn and
(UV-A treatment, Mylar foil, same exposure time Murphy (1985). The outcome of this simulation
as UV-B2 treatment) and a further control where depends on the biological weighting function that
the fluorescent tubes are replaced by wooden bars is used (Flint and Caldwell 2003a, b). We have
(control C). Each treatment is replicated four used the generalised plant action spectrum from
times. The tubes are controlled by timers (Grässlin, Caldwell (1971) since this is the most common
148

0.014

0.012
Irradiance (W · m · nm )

0.010
-1

0.008
-2

0.006

0.004

0.002

0.000

280 300 320 340 360 380 400


wavelength (nm)
Figure 3. Lamp spectra from UV-B minilamps at sample height (48 cm) after 9 h of exposure; dashed line: UV-C radiation excluded
with cellulose acetate (CA) foil (UV-B treatment), solid line: UV-C and UV-B radiation excluded with Mylar foil (UV-A treatment).

relative UV-B irradiance


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
15
(a) 75
(b) 0.00
75 85
90
10
90 85
80 0.10
distance from centre (cm)

80
distance from lamp (m)

85 90 95 95
90 85
5

0.20

0
80
95 95
85 90 90 85 0.30
-5

95
80 80 0.40
-10
90 90 I = 0.366 * d -1.365
85
75
85 R2 = 0.991
-15 0.50
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
distance from centre (cm)

Figure 4. Spatial distribution of UV-B radiation emitted by the mini UV-B lamp system. (a) Contour plot of relative UV-B irradiance
(centre=100%) at sample height (48 cm). (b) Relative irradiance in the centre plotted against lamp distance.

used BSWF and in this way is possible to culated doses were used to determine the duration
compare our experiments with other (previous) of exposure time. The daily irradiation was cen-
field experiments. Average lamp output and cal- tred around solar noon.
149

0.10

0.09
Biologically effective irradiance (W m )
-2

0.08

0.07

0.06

0.05

0.04

0.03

0.02 4 ˚C
8 ˚C
0.01 12 ˚ C

0.00
10 11 12 13 14
Lamp voltage (V)

Figure 5. Lamp output (Caldwell weighted biologically effective irradiance at sample height, 48 cm) and terminal voltage of the
batteries, that are used to power the lamps when a regular power supply is not available, are temperature dependent. To estimate the
influence of temperature and lamp voltage on lamp output these parameters were investigated in a temperature controlled climate
room. Lamp output was slightly dependent on temperature and tube voltage. In general lamp output is lower at lower temperatures
and at lower voltages.

Concluding remarks radiation, but is quickly repaired when lamps


are switched off. A few studies have demon-
Bryophytes are a significant species group of strated that supplemental UV-B radiation can
terrestrial plants, especially in polar and sub- influence photosynthetic activity and photosyn-
polar regions where the relative increase in UV- thetic pigments.
B radiation due to stratospheric ozone depletion In a meta-analysis of outdoor studies on higher
is high. In this review an attempt has been made plants, Searles et al. (2001) concluded that the
to summarise all outdoor studies on the effect of accumulation of UV-B absorbing compounds in
UV-B radiation on bryophytes. Since there are leaves was the most apparent effect of enhanced
only a limited number of field studies on bryo- UV-B radiation. This is probably not true for
phytes presented in the literature, a statistical bryophytes. In all studies where UV-B was arti-
meta-analysis of these data has not been made ficially enhanced no increase of UACs was
so far. However, nearly all studies demonstrated found. However, two in situ studies from New-
that mosses are well adapted to ambient levels sham et al. (2002) and Newsham (2003) sug-
of UV-B radiation since UV-B hardly affects gested that UACs were induced within 24 h
growth parameters. In all screening studies, under naturally elevated UV-B radiation. Fur-
where reduced UV-B levels were compared with thermore, in all studies described above, soluble
ambient levels, no effect of UV-B reduction or UACs have been measured. Meijkamp et al. (in
exclusion on photosynthesis, accumulation of preparation) showed that non-soluble (cell-wall
DNA damage and levels of UV-absorbing bound) compounds contribute largely to the
compounds was found. DNA damage can constitutive UV-screen in Vicia faba leaves.
accumulate under enhanced levels of UV-B Therefore in future studies the responses of
150

insoluble flavonoids to UV-B in bryophyte tis- References


sues should be investigated.
Long-term studies have shown that even though Allen D.J., Nogues S. and Baker N.R. 1998. Ozone depletion
biomass production per area is not altered, shoot and increased UV-B radiation: is there a real threat to pho-
tosynthesis? J. Exp. Bot. 49: 1775 –1788.
morphology can be influenced by UV-B radiation. Ballaré C.L., Rousseaux M.C., Searles P.S., Zaller J.G.,
Changes in plant morphology might affect eco- Giordano C.V., Robson T.M., Caldwell M.M., Sala O.E. and
system structure and function. For example, more Scopel A.L. 2001. Impacts of solar ultraviolet-B radiation on
branching or a decrease in annual length incre- terrestrial ecosystems of Tierra del Fuego (southern
ment can lead to reduced plant size, which can Argentina) – An overview of recent progress. J. Photochem.
Photobiol. B-Biol. 62: 67 –77.
shift the competitive balance by altering inter- Barsig M., Schneider K. and Gehrke C. 1998. Effects of UV-B
specific competition for visible light. To study radiation on fine structure, carbohydrates, and pigments in
these subtle interactions it is essential to continue Polytrichum commune. Bryologist 101: 357 –365.
these long-term experiments. Boelen P., Post A.F., Veldhuis M.J. and Buma A.G.J. 2002.
The mini UV-B supplementation system that Diel patterns of UVBR-induced DNA damage in pico-
plankton size fractions from the Gulf of Aqaba. Red Sea.
we have described here is especially designed to Microb. Ecol. 44: 164 –174.
study effects of UV-B radiation at remote field Björn L.O. and Murphy T.M. 1985. Computer calculation of
locations under harsh conditions and is therefore solar ultraviolet-radiation at ground-level. Physiol. Veg. 23:
highly suited to perform long-term studies in the 555 –561.
Arctic or Antarctic. Polar ecosystems are char- Bornman J.F. 1989. Target sites of UV-B radiation in photo-
synthesis of higher plants. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B-Biol.
acterised by extreme aridity and low temperatures 4: 145 –158.
and within this context it would be interesting to Bornman J.F. and Vogelmann T.C. 1991. Effect of UV-B
consider potential interactions between UV-B radiation on leaf optical-properties measured with fiber op-
stress and other environmental factors, such as tics. J. Exp. Bot. 42: 547 –554.
water availability and temperature. Caldwell M.M. 1971. Solar UV irradiation and the growth and
development of higher plants. In: Giece A.C. (ed.), Photo-
physiology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 131 –177.
Caldwell M.M., Gold W.G., Harris G. and Ashurst C.W. 1983.
Acknowledgements A modulated lamp system for solar UV-B (280 –320 Nm) –
supplementation studies in the field. Photochem. Photobiol.
37: 479 –485.
This work was funded by the Dutch council for Caldwell M.M., Bjorn L.O., Bornman J.F., Flint S.D., Kul-
Scientific Research (NWO-ALW grant UVANT- andaivelu G., Teramura A.H. and Tevini M. 1998. Effects of
ARCTIC, No. 851.20.010). We would like to increased solar ultraviolet radiation on terrestrial ecosystems.
thank Rod Strachan, Judith Dickson and Pete J. Photochem. Photobiol. B-Biol. 46: 40 –52.
Dai Q.J., Yan B., Huang S.B., Liu X.Z., Peng S.B., Miranda
Convey from the British Antarctic Survey and Stef M.L.L., Chavez A.Q., Vergara B.S. and Olszyk D.M. 1997.
Bokhorst from the Netherlands Institute of Response of oxidative stress defense systems in rice (Oryza
Ecology for their support at the long-term field sativa) leaves with supplemental UV-B radiation. Physiol.
experiment at Signy Island. Logistic support from Plant. 101: 301 –308.
the British Antarctic Survey is also gratefully Day T.A. 2001. Ultraviolet radiation and plant ecosystems. In:
Cockell C.S. and Blaustein A.R. (eds.), Ecosystems, evolu-
acknowledged. We would like to thank Eveline tion and ultraviolet radiation, Springer-Verlag, NY, pp.
Schut, Mariska Wagenaar and Rob Broekman for 80 –117.
technical assistance. We also thank Martien van Dormann C.F. and Woodin S.J. 2002. Climate change in the
Vilsteren, Daan van Marum and Flip de Kriek Arctic: using plant functional types in a meta-analysis of field
experiments. Funct. Ecol. 16: 4 –17.
(Electronics department and Mechanical depart-
Fenton J.H.C. 1980. The rate of peat accumulation in Antarctic
ment from de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) for moss banks. J. Ecol. 68: 211 –228.
their skilful support in designing and constructing Fenton J.H.C. 1982. The formation of vertical edges on Ant-
the mini UV-B supplementation system. Anita G. arctic moss peat banks. Arctic Alpine Res. 14: 21 –26.
J. Buma and Willem van de Poll, University of Flint S.D. and Caldwell M.M. 2003a. A biological spectral
Groningen, are thanked for their help with DNA weighting function for ozone depletion research with higher
plants. Physiol. Plant. 117: 137 –144.
damage analysis. Further we wish to thank K. Flint S.D. and Caldwell M.M. 2003b. Field testing of UV
Newsham and L.O. Björn for constructive sug- biological spectral weighting functions for higher plants.
gestions on an earlier version of this manuscript. Physiol. Plant. 117: 145 –153.
151

Fowbert J.A. 1996. An experimental study of growth in relation antia polymorpha on UV-B enhancement. Phytochemistry 48:
to morphology and shoot water content in maritime Ant- 791 –794.
arctic mosses. New Phytol. 133: 363 –373. Meijkamp B., Aerts R., van de Staaij J., Tosserams M., Ernst
Gehrke C., Johanson U., Gwynn-Jones D., Bjorn L.O., Calla- W.H.O. and Rozema J. 1999. Effects of UV-B on sec-
ghan T.V. and Lee J.A. 1996. Effects of enhanced ultraviolet- ondary metabolites in plants. In: Rozema J. (ed.), Strato-
B radiation on terrestrial subarctic ecosystems and implica- spheric Ozone Depletion: The Effects of Enhanced UV-B
tions for interactions with increased CO2. Ecol. Bull. 45: Radiation on Terrestrial Ecosystems, Backhuys Publishers,
192 –203. Leiden, pp. 71 –99.
Gehrke C. 1998. Effects of enhanced UV-B radiation on pro- Montiel P., Smith A. and Keiller D. 1999. Photosynthetic
duction-related properties of a Sphagnum fuscum dominated responses of selected Antarctic plants to solar radiation in the
subarctic bog. Funct. Ecol. 12: 940 –947. southern maritime Antarctic. Polar Res. 18: 229 –235.
Gehrke C. 1999. Impacts of enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation on Newsham K.K., Mcleod A.R., Greenslade P.D. and Emmett
mosses in a subarctic heath ecosystem. Ecology 80: 1844 –1851. B.A. 1996. Appropriate controls in outdoor UV-B sup-
Green A.E.S. 1983. The penetration of ultraviolet-radiation to plementation experiments. Global Change Biol. 2: 319 –
the ground. Physiol. Plant. 58: 351 –359. 324.
Green T.G.A., Schroeter B. and Seppelt R. 2000. Effects of Newsham K.K., Hodgson D.A., Murray A.W.A., Peat H.J.
temperature, light and ambient UV on the photosynthesis of and Smith R.I.L. 2002. Response of two Antarctic bryo-
the moss Bryum argenteum Hedw. in continental Antarctica. phytes to stratospheric ozone depletion. Global Change Biol.
In: Davison W., Howard-Williams C. and Broady P. (eds.), 8: 972 –983.
Antarctic Ecosystems: Models for Wider Understanding, Newsham K.K. 2003. UV-B radiation arising from strato-
Caxton Press, Christchurch, pp. 165 –170. spheric ozone depletion influences the pigmentation of
Huiskes A.H.L., Lud D. and Moerdijk-Poortvliet T.C.W. 2001. the Antarctic moss Andreaea regularis. Oecologia 135: 327 –
Field research on the effects of UV-B filters on terrestrial 331.
Antarctic vegetation. Plant Ecol. 154: 77 –86. Niemi R., Martikainen P.J., Silvola J., Sonninen E., Wulff A.
Jansen M.A.K., Gaba V. and Greenberg B.M. 1998. Higher and Holopainen T. 2002a. Responses of two Sphagnum
plants and UV-B radiation: balancing damage, repair and moss species and Eriophorum vaginatum to enhanced UV-B
acclimation. Trends Plant Sci. 3: 131 –135. in a summer of low UV intensity. New Phytol. 156: 509 –
Johanson U., Gehrke C., Bjorn L.O., Callaghan T.V. and 515.
Sonesson M. 1995. The Effects of enhanced UV-B Radiation Niemi R., Martikainen P.J., Silvola J., Wulff A., Turtola S. and
on a sub-Arctic heath ecosystem. Ambio 24: 106 –112. Holopainen A. 2002b. Elevated UV-B radiation alters fluxes
Kennedy A.D. 1995. Simulated climate-change – are passive of methane and carbon dioxide in peatland microcosms.
greenhouses a valid microcosm for testing the biological Global Change Biol. 8: 361 –371.
effects of environmental perturbations. Global Change Biol. Phoenix G.K., Gwynn-Jones D., Callaghan T.V., Sleep D. and
1: 29 –42. Lee J.A. 2001. Effects of global change on a sub-Arctic heath:
Krizek D.T. and Mirecki R.M. 2004. Evidence for phytotoxic effects of enhanced UV-B radiation and increased summer
effects of cellulose acetate in UV exclusion studies. Environ. precipitation. J. Ecol. 89: 256 –267.
Exper. Bot. 51: 33 –43. Pourzand C. and Tyrrell R.M. 1999. Apoptosis, the role of
Lud D., Moerdijk T.C.W., van de Poll W.H., Buma A.G.J. and oxidative stress and the example of solar UV radiation.
Huiskes A.H.L. 2002. DNA damage and photosynthesis in Photochem. Photobiol. 70: 380 –390.
Antarctic and Arctic Sanionia uncinata (Hedw.) Loeske under Robinson S.A., Wasley J. and Tobin A.K. 2003. Living on the
ambient and enhanced levels of UV-B radiation. Plant Cell edge - plants and global change in continental and maritime
Environ. 25: 1579 –1589. Antarctica. Global Change Biol. 9: 1681 –1717.
Lud D., Schlensog M., Schroeter B. and Huiskes A.H.L. 2003. Robson T.M., Pancotto V.A., Flint S.D., Ballare C.L., Sala
The influence of UV-B radiation on light-dependent photo- O.E., Scopel A.L. and Caldwell M.M. 2003. Six years of
synthetic performance in Sanionia uncinata (Hedw.) Loeske solar UV-B manipulations affect growth of Sphagnum and
in Antarctica. Polar Biol. 26: 225 –232. vascular plants in a Tierra del Fuego peatland. New Phytol.
Madronich S., McKenzie R.L., Bjorn L.O. and Caldwell M.M. 160: 379 –389.
1998. Changes in biologically active ultraviolet radiation Rozema J., van de Staaij J., Bjorn L.O. and Caldwell M. 1997a.
reaching the Earth’s surface. J. Photochem. Photobiol. UV-B as an environmental factor in plant life: stress and
B-Biol. 46: 5 –19. regulation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 22 –28.
Markham K.R. 1990. Bryophyte flavonoids, their structures Rozema J., Van de Staaij J., Meijkamp B., Lud D., Moerdijk T.
distribution, and evolutionary significance. In: Zinsmeister and Huiskes A. 1997b. Stratosperic ozone depletion and ef-
H.D. and Mues R. (eds.), Bryophytes: Their Chemistry and fects of enhanced UV-B radiation on terrestrial antarctic
Chemical Taxonomy, Oxford University Press, New York, plants: the methodology of a mini-UV-B supplementation
pp. 143 –159. system. Circumpolar J. 12: 43 –48.
Markham K.R., Franke A., Given D.R. and Brownsey P. 1990. Rozema J., Broekman R., Lud D., Huiskes A.H.J., Moerdijk
Historical Antarctic ozone level trens from herbarium speci- T., de Bakker N., Meijkamp B. and van Beem A. 2001a.
men flavonoids. Bulletin de Liaison Groupe de Polyphenols Consequences of depletion of stratospheric ozone for terres-
15: 230 –235. trial Antarctic ecosystems: the response of Deschampsia ant-
Markham K.R., Ryan K.G., Bloor S.J. and Mitchell K.A. arctica to enhanced UV-B radiation in a controlled
1998. An increase in the luteolin: apigenin ratio in March- environment. Plant Ecol. 154: 103 –115.
152

Rozema J., Broekman R.A., Blokker P., Meijkamp B.B., de ultraviolet-B radiation in a southern South American
Bakker N., van de Staaij J., van Beem A., Ariese F. and Kars Sphagnum peatland. J. Ecol. 90: 704 –713.
S.M. 2001b. UV-B absorbance and UV-B absorbing com- Setlow R.B. 1974. The wavelengths in sunlight effective in
pounds (para-coumaric acid) in pollen and sporopollenin: the producing skin cancer: a theoretical analysis. Proc. Natl.
perspective to track historic UV-B levels. J. Photochem. Acad. Sci. USA 71: 3363 –3366.
Photobiol. B-Biol. 62: 108 –117. Sonesson M., Carlsson B.A., Callaghan T.V., Halling S., Björn
Rozema J., Noordijk A.J., Broekman R.A., van Beem A., L.O., Bertgren M. and Johanson U. 2002. Growth of two
Meijkamp B.M., de Bakker N.V.J., van de Staaij J.W.M., peat-forming mosses in subarctic mires: species interactions
Stroetenga M., Bohncke S.J.P., Konert M., Kars S., Peat H., and effects of simulated climate change. Oikos 99: 151 –160.
Smith R.I.L. and Convey P. 2001c. (Poly)phenolic com- Steeneken S.F., Buma A.G.J. and Gieskes W.W.C. 1995.
pounds in pollen and spores of Antarctic plants as indicators Changes in transmission characteristics of polymethylmeth-
of solar UV-B – A new proxy for the reconstruction of past acrylate and cellulose-(III) acetate during exposure to ultra-
solar UV-B? Plant Ecol. 154: 11 –26. violet-light. Photochem. Photobiol. 61: 276 –280.
Rozema J., van Geel B., Bjorn L.O., Lean J. and Madronich S. Sullivan J.H., Teramura A.H., Adamse P., Kramer G.F.,
2002. Paleoclimate: toward solving the UV puzzle. Science Upadhyaya A., Britz S.J., Krizek D.T. and Mirecki R.M.
296: 1621 –1622. 1994. Comparison of the response of soybean to
Sancar A. and Sancar G.B. 1988. DNA-repair enzymes. Annu. supplemental UV-B radiation supplired by either
Rev. Biochem. 57: 29 –67. square-wave or modulated irradiation systems. In: Biggs
Searles P.S., Flint S.D., Diaz S.B., Rousseaux M.C., Ballare R.H. and Joyner M.E.B. (eds.), Stratospheric ozone
C.L. and Caldwell M.M. 1999. Solar ultraviolet-B radiation depletion/UV-B radiation n the biosphere, Springer-Verlag,
influence on Sphagnum bog and Carex fen ecosystems: first Berlin, pp. 211 –220.
field season findings in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Global Teramura A.H. and Sullivan J.H. 1994. Effects of UV-B Radi-
Change Biol. 5: 225 –234. ation on photosynthesis and growth of terrestrial plants.
Searles P.S., Flint S.D. and Caldwell M.M. 2001. A meta- Photosynth. Res. 39: 463 –473.
analysis of plant field studies simulating stratospheric ozone WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 2003. Scientific
depletion. Oecologia 127: 1 –10. Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2002. Global Ozone
Searles P.S., Flint S.D., Diaz S.B., Rousseaux M.C., Ballare Research and Monitoring Project—Report No. 47. Geneva,
C.L. and Caldwell M.M. 2002. Plant response to solar pp. 498.
Photo. Arctic tundra peat in front of Stuphallet, Brøggerhalvøya, not far from Ny
Alesund.Nutrient enrichment by nesting seabirds at the steep rocks of Stuphallet
stimulates growth of many arctic plants. Because of the permafrost at 15 –20 cm below
ground level, and soil melt-water in the summer period, the wet tundra soil is
waterlogged. A peat profile was sampled with a depth of 105 cm using a motor-driven soil
corer with a saw-tooth end. Photograph by J. Rozema.

You might also like