8/23/2021 C* - An unknown star

www.engineeringpilot.com Search... Home Blog Services Library About

Andreas Oct 15, 2018

C* - An unknown star
Updated: Apr 27, 2020

C* (pronounced „C-Star“), is one of the dominant digital flight control laws for Fly-By-Wire
(FBW) transport aircraft. It has its roots in the 1960’s in the United States [1] [4] and is used
by several of the most important aircraft manufacturers for pitch control. A large
European aircraft manufacturer uses a version closely related to the original C* idea,
while a large U.S. manufacturer uses a more modified version to obtain a rather
conventional aircraft behaviour and calls it C*U [1].
That should be enough motivation for us to shed some light on the underlying magic.
Now if you are not into engineering, no worries, there will only be two equations in this
article, I promise!

Figure 1: C*, a magic concept

FBW technology is in fact not a recent development at all, as the general definition refers
to electrical signalling of control surface actuators [1]. Such an aircraft would still behave
relatively conventionally. The probably earliest application of electrical signalling to flight
control servos was achieved by Tupolev on the ANT-20 aircraft during the 1930’s (!) [5].
Later examples were the Avro Arrow CF-105 in the 1950’s, or the NASA F-8 program, the
latter actually introduced the digital FBW technology [2].
Electrical signalling really forms the foundation of every aerospace engineer’s dream:
Being able to change what the pilot controls ;-) The introduction of digital FBW systems
has provided the freedom for an infinite amount of possible control laws.

https://www.engineeringpilot.com/post/2018/10/15/c-an-unknown-star 1/5
8/23/2021 C* - An unknown star

The C* control idea

A pilot primarily senses changes in load factor and attitude [1] [3] [4]. Now the flight
www.engineeringpilot.com Search... Home Blog Services Library About
dynamics dictate that at “high” airspeeds, the load factor change is more noticeable,
whereas at “low” speeds, the attitude change dominates [3] [4]. And this is already the key
idea of the C* control law: To create a parameter (C*), that represents a linear combination
of load factor and pitch-rate [4]. This makes it relatively easy to maintain a stable flight
path in cruise, while maintaining an intuitive behavior for maneuvering. The problem of
how to “trade” pitch-rate priority for load factor priority was originally solved by
introducing a “crossover speed”. At that speed, the load factor demand and the pitch-rate
demand are weighted equally [1] [4].

Figure 2: C* control architecture (simplified), based on [1] [4]

Figure 2 depicts a simplified version of the C* concept. The pilot controls a parameter,
called C*, that is composed of the normal load factor (green) and the normal load factor
that would be felt, if the aircraft was travelling at the crossover speed Uco and subject to
the current pitch rate (blue) (wings level). The ingenuity here: If the aircraft travels at Uco,
then the two parts are equally weighted, if the aircraft is faster than Uco, the normal load
factor demand dominates and if the aircraft is slower than Uco, the pitch-rate demand
dominates [1][4]. The C* error is then fed through an integrator before being transmitted to
the elevator. This mainly serves the purpose of reducing steady-state error. (If there is a
small persistent error, the elevator deflection will steadily increase). Gains are not shown
for simplicity.
For the mathematically inclined, it is obvious that this control law does not possess any
“speed-stability” and thus fails to comply with basic airworthiness requirements [1]. A
reduction of thrust will result in an increasing angle of attack without altitude loss.
Looking at the aerodynamics, it is quite apparent that this will go on for a while, before
coming to an abrupt end. Such a deficiency is usually accounted for by introduction of
some sort of “envelope protection”, which ultimately restores a safe aircraft behaviour. In
such a control law, a conventional trimming by the pilot makes no longer sense and
automatic trimming is usually introduced [1][4].

https://www.engineeringpilot.com/post/2018/10/15/c-an-unknown-star 2/5
8/23/2021 C* - An unknown star

A side note: A conventional aircraft is stable in angle of attack, not airspeed [1] [6], but if
the load factor is kept constant,Search...
it seems that there is a “trim speed” (more on that in
www.engineeringpilot.com Home Blog Services Library About
another article…)

The C*U control modification

Not all manufacturers and pilots like the pure C* control and so a very popular
modification includes the re-introduction of “speed stability”. The “U” refers to the flight
dynamics terminology for the velocity in the forward direction [1] [4]. It is important to
realize that this is still a digital flight control law, based on the C* concept, but it includes
a mathematical term to create a conventional aircraft behavior, while maintaining the
good handling qualities of the C* control law [1]. A new term “Uerr” is added, which is
nothing else that the difference between the “trim speed” and the current CAS. This
creates a pitching moment similar to a conventional aircraft, if the CAS deviates from the
“trim speed” [1].

Figure 3: C*U control architecture (simplified), based on [1]

Figure 3 above shows a C*U concept with the introduction of a “trim speed”. In the
practical implementation of a particular U.S. manufacturer, the trim switches on the yoke
do not cause the stabilizer to move directly, but just change the value of the “trim speed”
[1]. For a pilot, the aircraft behaves very similar to a conventional aircraft.

A step further
When re-examining the idea of making it easy to maintain a certain flight path, the
original C* algorithm is not quite perfect, since an external disturbance that results in a
flight path deviation is not automatically compensated [1]. Some aircraft manufacturers
have developed a so-called Flight Path Angle Rate Command (FPARC) control law that
also takes into account such deviations and thus makes pilot life even easier [1]. Such an
aircraft simply maintains the current flight path vector without pilot input. This control law
in particular shows that a pilot is more and more pushed into the role of a strategic
decision maker and less involved in the immediate control of aerodynamic control
surfaces…

https://www.engineeringpilot.com/post/2018/10/15/c-an-unknown-star 3/5
8/23/2021 C* - An unknown star

The control laws described above are all ingenious in their own way and I will leave it to
www.engineeringpilot.com Search... Home Blog Services Library About
the reader to decide which one fits best. The future will show what other developments
we might be faced with and I think it is important for pilots to have a conceptual
understanding of what they are actually controlling. Additionally, we should never forget
that no matter how sophisticated a flight control law might be, there is no flight control
law that would enable us to overcome basic physical limitations...

This short article is by far not all-encompassing, but I hope it provided some insights into
the world of electrons between the yoke and the elevator.

Rev/20181015

References

[1] D. Niedermeier, A. Lambregts, 2009, Fly-by-Wire augmented manual control –

basic design considerations, 28th International congress of the aeronautical sciences
[2] J. E. Tomayko, 2000, Computers take flight: A history of NASA’s pioneering fly-by-
wire project, The NASA history series
[3] E. Field, 1993, The application of a C* flight control law to large civil aircraft,
College of aeronautics, Cranfield
[4] J. P. Sutherland, 1968, fly-by-wire flight control systems, Air Force flight dynamics
laboratory, Ohio
[5] http://www.tupolev.ru/en/aircrafts/ant-20_(maxim_gorky) (10.10.2018)
[6] J. Russel (1996), Performance & Stability of aircraft, 1st edition, Butterworth-
Heinemann

#flightcontrol #C #CU #stability #dynamics #FBW #control

Flight dynamics

Recent Posts See All

https://www.engineeringpilot.com/post/2018/10/15/c-an-unknown-star 4/5
8/23/2021 C* - An unknown star

Aircraft-Pilot Coupling – A “new spin” on spins Maneuvering effects

Understanding why and…
www.engineeringpilot.com Search... Home Blog Services Library About

Home Blog Services Library About

Privacy policy

Subscribe

©2021 by www.engineeringpilot.com
 
Disclaimer:
The information herein has been reviewed, but may still contain errors.
It shall be used with caution and treated as advisory information only.
Always refer to the official documents applicable to your aircraft and operating environment.
The author cannot be held liable for any of the content.

https://www.engineeringpilot.com/post/2018/10/15/c-an-unknown-star 5/5