Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RJ Boccomino
Professor Heuton
Sports, the last bastion of escape in the United States. At least it was, until the COVID-19
pandemic. Sports were impacted starting March 11, 2020, when the first major sporting event
between the Oklahoma City Thunder and Utah Jazz was postponed. This led to a domino effect
of sports leagues postponing and cancelling their seasons shortly after. Before the COVID-19
pandemic hit in March 2020, nearly 150 million individuals attended professional sporting
events in 2018 across the five major sports leagues.1 As sports resumed in July, we saw games
played without fans - empty seats throughout Major League Baseball, tarped off seating with big
advertisements in the NHL, and a “bubble” like atmosphere for the NBA playoffs. Stadiums and
arenas that would normally hold between 10,000 to 100,000 fans now have gone a year without
holding capacity, whether it be from big sporting events, concerts, or any other sort of event that
would normally be held in these colossal multi-hundred million dollar stadiums built in the last
20 years. Now they sit as empty buildings in metropolitan areas. Even as fans have begun to be
welcomed back into sports stadiums polling shows that among self-identified sports fans, 27
percent of respondents said they would be either “very” or “somewhat” comfortable going to a
game.2 With the slow return to normalcy in sports this leads to the nature of this assessment.
What do sports arenas/stadiums bring for the cities they reside in? Are these mostly city-funded
1
According to the US Travel Association, 2019.
2
Silverman, 2021.
Boccomino 2
stadiums a sign of prosperity and revitalization for a city? Or do they in turn have a negative
impact, causing blight and more or less “window dressing” for poorer areas?
This issue at hand is significant because on the surface we tend to believe in simple
solutions. We tend to believe in the mantra of, “If you build it, they will come,” when discussing
intricate issues like urban redevelopment and city revitalization. It’s very easy to believe that a
brand new $863 million dollar stadium3 can bring economic success but it’s not that simple to
create prosperity so quickly. In many ways if the mindset is that building a stadium will bring
prosperity, then many people in that city will be taken advantage of. In turn, it may cause some
long term blight and other issues for the city itself. Detroit is an example of this issue as the
argument can be made that the city has dealt with both the negative impacts of a team leaving the
city for a suburb (The Detroit Pistons left the city in 1978 for the city of Pontiac and then the
suburb of Auburn Hills before returning back to Detroit in 2017) and also the impact of a brand
new stadium being built with the promises of bringing prosperity in the idea of “District Detroit.”
In reality, it has turned into a part of Midtown that is mostly ignored by locals and only busy
With some prior knowledge, personal experience, and further research the
recommendation I have is a quite simple solution. Do not just let private companies and
billionaires pressure cities into paying for publicly funded stadiums. Instead, the money that
residents pay in taxes should be focused on improving their city as a whole by investing in
schools, local businesses, and public services. Public-funded stadiums tend to siphon off tax
revenue that is desperately needed in other systems that may not have the same amount of
revenue as a professional sports team which is one of the results of Little Caesars Arena. Another
problematic aspect of the Little Caesars Arena development is the use of tax increment financing
3
Price of Little Caesars Arena based off of Detroit Free Press article by Joe Gullien. 9/6/2017.
Boccomino 3
(TIF) to the detriment of the city’s public school system. TIF essentially redirects taxpayer money
away from vital City services to support profit-seeking activities. This is particularly troubling
for Detroit, which has struggled with poor public school performance and its effects on
enrollment and families.38 By 2051, $726 million of property tax revenue will be diverted from
state and local public school funds to pay for the redevelopment.4 Public-funded stadiums in turn
promise prosperity for very small parts of a city, causing social blight on the city's services. With
that cause and effect, it is an easy decision to make owners of these sports teams pay for the new
stadiums themselves. These stadiums are used as corporations, whose owners basically print
money hand over fist and increase profits every year. Publicly funded stadiums in cities like
Detroit, Oakland, and Baltimore have shown negative economic impact on their cities. The
residents of the city foot some of the bill for these stadiums that many are outpriced from even
attending. It is considerably a myth that stadiums can revitalize a downtown purely on it’s own
merit. It is a simple and very much illogical solution to a complex issue such as city
revitalization, especially when a team that occupies the arena is not very competitive. From
experience, we see this with Detroit’s Little Caesars Arena, home of the NHL’s Detroit Redwings
and NBA’s Detroit Pistons. Branded the “District Detroit,” it was supposed to revitalize the
Downtown Area of Detroit. Four years later, both teams are averaging near the bottom of the
league and the “new stadium” appeal of the arena seems to have worn off. In fact, Little Caesars
Arena has been criticized for changing the seat colors in the arena from red to black in order to
hide the lackluster interests in the teams that call Little Caesars Arena home. The red seats have
been noteworthy for highlighting empty seats during Detroit Red Wings and Detroit Pistons
telecasts, although both franchises say fans are dispersed throughout the arena in clubs and
4
Cho, 2018.
Boccomino 4
bars.5 Driving through Midtown before the COVID-19 pandemic, whether just to get out for a
nice drive or in between classes at Wayne State, Little Caesars Arena always seemed to feel like
a private corporation building rather than the public multi-purpose arena Detroit was promised.
Little Caesars Arena seems to be lackluster and “cookie-cutter” in its build that really doesn’t
attract locals or visitors including suburbanites who will make the trip in and out of the city of
Detroit for a night with most of the money they spend going towards the billionaires’ businesses
rather than to the local economy of the city. In some ways, the arena may impact and hurt local
businesses more as the Illitch family, Tom Gores, and Dan Gilbert - some of the most wealthy
people in the city - have continued to buy out local businesses and invest in only certain parts of
the city that can net a profit for their businesses. In spite of the claims of public benefit, the Little
Caesars Arena may not contribute much to the City’s fiscal condition or to its residents outside of
the 7.2 square miles of concentrated redevelopment. America’s cities and metropolitan areas are
already marked by intense stratification.6 The combined ownerships of the Illitch’s, Gores, and
Gilbert have an Amazon-like effect to the city as the three billionaires end up buying up and
monopolizing city land for the value and then profit off it when they build out of priced housing
for wealthy populations which can drive gentrification or in many of the Illitch’s projects
bulldoze the land for endless parking lots and structures for the publicly-funded arena they built
as so does happen many times when a new stadium is built removing land that could be used for
housing, retail, restaurants, etc. Private parking lots add to this area. What surrounds these
nuisance and chooses to locate as far away as possible. Retail outlets will not choose to locate
near stadia if stadia are their only means of survival. These are preconditions for blight.7
5
Ellis, 2018.
6
Cho, 2018.
7
Nelson, 2001.
Boccomino 5
While the upgraded Little Caesars Arena was definitely needed for the aging Joe Louis
Arena, I do look at the move to be somewhat of a cautionary tale to other cities in talks with their
local teams owners about footing the bill on a new stadium proposal. While in some cases there
seems to be a positive economic impact of a new stadium cities should be as careful with rubber
stamping any price tag on a proposed new stadium that may be offered up by some sports owner
in their town. Cities and it’s residents should be very careful when team owners ask for
publicly-funded stadiums and throw out numbers that sound impressive but are in reality most
likely non-binding and inflated. If they don’t they may be footed an expensive bill for a structure
that more or less is simply a profit for the owners of the stadium rather than the city and the
people as a whole.
Boccomino 6
Bibliography
https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/143826.
Ellis, Vince. “Little Caesars Arena Doing Away With Red Seats.” Detroit Free Press.
https://www.freep.com/story/sports/2018/10/08/little-caesars-arena-red-seats-lower-bowl-at
tendance/1573228002/.
Guillen, Joe. “Little Caesars Arena: How the Cost Nearly Doubled to $863 Million.”
https://www.freep.com/story/money/business/2017/09/06/little-caesars-arena-detroit-cost/6
16890001/.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089124240101500305.
Silverman, Alex. “Vast Majority of Americans Still Uncomfortable Attending Games One
https://morningconsult.com/2021/03/10/sports-attendance-covid-one-year-later/.
“The Impact Of Sports On The Travel Industry.” Accessed April 11, 2021.
https://www.ustravel.org/system/files/media_root/document/2019_Sports-Travel_07.11.19.
pdf.