Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Skyler Maynard
Professor Gardiakos
ENC1101
16 July 2021
Many studies have been done to understand the composing process of writing, but
it remains largely unknown. Sonda Perl tries to understand the composing process of
writing by using students considered unskilled as the basis of her experiment. She does
this because she believes past experiments are flawed for two reasons: the lack of graphic
evidence and patterns, and the use of skilled writers as the subject of the experiment. By
continuing to research the topic in a similar manner, the problem of trying to understand
the writing process will remain. To counteract these issues, Sondra chooses to study
students considered unskilled by their teachers. The students go through five 90-minute
sessions that have them compose aloud and externalize their thinking process. In these
sessions, the researcher assumed a noninterfering role, and the responses by the student
were recorded. At the end of the experiment, the students’ written works were collected
and typed, keeping the original style and errors (if any). Then, the writings were
separated into three miscue categories: speaking complete ideas but omitting certain
words during writing, pronouncing words with plural markers or other suffixes
completely but omitting these endings during writing, and pronouncing the desired word
word on paper. None of the research explains what they wrote, but how the students
observed chose to write. The process Sondra chose to use during her research reminds me
Maynard 2
of my own process when writing. Whenever I sit down to write, I initially start by writing
down all my thoughts on the topic. Since I’m usually alone, I do this to substitute for
verbally discussing it with someone. By doing this, I’m able to have a clear
understanding of what I want to include in my writing, and what order it should be in.
Afterward, I change the wording of my written thoughts to suit the paper I’m writing.
Anne Lamott describes the “voices in your head” during the writing process as
different characters inside your head. Each one has a different role in the writing process,
some are meant to negatively critique you, and others are meant to encourage you to
continue going. For example, Lamott mentions the “vinegar-lipped Reader Lady,” who
attacks how interesting the subject is or not. Personally, I don’t have many voices in my
head when I’m writing unless I’m experiencing writer’s block. Whenever I’m
experiencing writer’s block, I have a couple of negative voices in my head. They don’t
necessarily have a face or name to them because they’re more so an emotion than a
thought in my head. For example, whenever I feel pressured to write something, I feel
this unwanted weight inside my head and I’ll be reminded of the pressure I felt
throughout high school. There isn’t any voice or commentary on my actual writing, but
instead, there are feelings on my writing. For Lamott, she is able to silence her voices by
muting them. Instead, I have to evaluate if what they’re saying is actual legitimate
criticism or not. After I’m able to understand if it’s legitimate criticism or not, I’m often
times able to silence the voices in my head. If it’s a particularly difficult day, I might
have to take a break from writing altogether, and come back to it later, but this is quite
rare for me. From personal experience, I think I experience the worst of my negative
Maynard 3
voices when I first begin writing. Something about writing on a blank document is
extremely stressful to me. This is one of the reasons why I began writing down all my
thoughts before beginning my first draft. To counteract this further, I always have
multiple documents for my essays, one that has my plan, one for the first draft, then one
for the final draft. This way I don’t feel like I could destroy anything I’ve written.
Maynard 4
Works Cited
Lamott, Anne. Writing about Writing, by Elizabeth Wardle and Doug Downs, Fourth ed.,
Perl, Sondra. Writing about Writing, by Elizabeth Wardle and Doug Downs, Fourth ed.,