Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The heart of Judeo-Christian theology is the revelation of God. My mentor, Fr. Robert J.
evidence from cosmology and philosophy for an intelligent creator, but he is also a Jesuit, and he
told me, “For us to know God, he had to reveal himself. We would never know the Father of the
Prodigal Son (a metaphor Jesus used to characterize God in Luke 15:20-24) by pondering an
uncaused cause or observing the redshift of galaxies.” Christians believe Jesus is the perfect
revelation of God, God in human form, and he certainly was a historical figure. Even leading
skeptical New Testament scholar Bart Ehrman says, “No scholar in any college or university in
the Western World, who teaches classics, ancient history, New Testament, early Christianity, any
related field, doubts Jesus existed.” There are many early, extra-Biblical sources that mention
him. For instance, much of what is known about ancient Rome comes from 1st-century historian
Cornelius Tacitus. His books, The Histories and The Annals contain insight into Roman politics
and history from the reign of Caesar Augustus to Nero (27 BC - 68 AD). Tacitus references Jesus
in The Annals to record an event in 64 AD when Nero was blamed by his people for a
conflagration beginning in Rome’s Circus Maximus Stadium. The fire swept the city and burned
10 of Rome’s 14 districts, leaving thousands destitute. Tacitus illustrates how Nero scapegoated
the Christians to resist the accusations against him, “Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the
most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace.
Christ, whom the name had its origin, had undergone the death penalty in the reign of Tiberius at
the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilate, and a pernicious superstition, thus checked
for the moment” (Tacitus XV, 44). Tacitus attests to the persecution of early Christians and Jesus’
disciple’s “Superstition” that he resurrected. Novelist and theologian C.S. Lewis argued that
1
Jesus could not have been “Just a good moral teacher,” as some say, because he was claiming to
be the Son of God and the messiah prophesied in the Old Testament. Otherwise, he would not
have been executed as a criminal. In Mere Christianity, Lewis wrote, “You can shut Him up for a
fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon, or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord
and God” (Lewis 31). A moral teacher who is merely mortal would not put himself on the level
of God. Thus, Jesus was either a depraved deceiver, a lunatic, or who he claimed to be. What
Contemporary scholars agree that the four canonical gospels were written as
Greco-Roman biographies of Jesus in the living memory of Jesus’ apostles. Historians usually
accept Greco-Roman biographies as historically reliable sources, but skeptical scholars repudiate
much of what Jesus said and did in the gospels. However, the majority of skeptical scholars
accept that Jewish Sanhedrin Joseph of Arimathea gave Jesus an honorable burial where he
wrapped Jesus’ body in linen and placed him in a publicly known tomb in Jerusalem. The
majority of skeptics also accept that Jesus’ tomb was found empty by his women followers and
3.5 ft linen burial cloth, with two faint images and bloodstains of the front and back sides of a
5’9 ft - 6’0 ft scourged and crucified nude man. The images align like they were imprinted as the
man lay at one end of the cloth, and the other end was brought over his head to cover his body.
This shroud resides in Turin, Italy, and is believed to be either a medieval forgery made by a
clever artist or the authentic burial shroud that Jewish Sanhedrin, Joseph of Arimathea, wrapped
Jesus’ body in. Luke 24:12 and John 20:5 say Jesus’ linen burial cloths were left in his tomb
2
after he rose from the dead. Some Christians believe Jesus’ resurrection produced the images on
The Royal Savoy family of Italy owned the Shroud from 1453 until they gave it to the
Vatican in 1983. For centuries, it was hidden from public view until Italian photographer
Secondo Pia took the Shroud’s first pictures in 1898. When Pia was processing the photographs,
he was taken aback when he saw his negative image (white and black reversed) of the Shroud.
The ghostly images of the man transformed into detailed positive ones (normal images). This
means the Shroud images are negatives. In 1976, Dr. John Jackson, a physicist from NASA,
placed a picture of the Shroud under a VP-8 analyzer, which NASA used to map the terrain of
paintings become distorted under the analyzer, whereas the Shroud picture revealed 3D
information of the man’s whole body encoded in the image. Jackson’s discovery captured the
interest of scientists, and he became the leader of the Shroud of Turin Research Project or
STURP Investigation in 1978. Forty American scientists came together in Turin, Italy, to solve
how the Shroud image was made. According to a book entitled, Report of the Shroud of Turin by
Dr. John H. Heller, a biophysicist on the STURP team, “Between 100,000 and 150,000 scientific
man-hours were spent [collectively on the Shroud], with the best analytical tools available”
(Heller 291). However, major research ceased in 1988 when a single sample was cut from the
corner of the Shroud. A carbon-14 test dated it from the 13th-14th century.
In 2000, a published x-ray analysis study on the Shroud revealed a seam through the area
where the sample was taken. This caused prior STURP team thermochemist Dr. Raymond
Rogers to analyze the carbon-14 sample. According to his peer-reviewed journal in 2005, Studies
on the Radiocarbon Sample from the Shroud of Turin, “A gum/dye/mordant coating is easy to
3
observe on the radiocarbon yarns. No other part of the Shroud shows such a coating. The
radiocarbon sample had been dyed” (Rogers 189). Additionally, while the Shroud is entirely
made of linen, Dr. Rogers discovered that the sample has significant cotton content in it. Dr.
Rogers concluded, “The radiocarbon sample was thus not part of the original cloth and is invalid
for determining the age of the Shroud” (Rogers 189). The radiocarbon sample did not match the
original cloth because, in 1532, the Shroud was burned in a fire in Chambéry Cathedral, France.
The Shroud was left with burn holes and scorch lines down each side of the image. To preserve
the Shroud, Poor Clare Nuns patched the burn holes, added a backing cloth, and repaired the
burned corner using a technique called invisible mending. They spliced cotton threads into the
linen and dyed the cotton to match. Therefore, the carbon-14 test was the mean date of the
repaired corner. The Vatican has not allowed another carbon-14 test. However, Dr. Rogers did a
vanillin decay test on the central part of the Shroud. He concluded in his study, “Kinetics of
vanillin loss suggests that the Shroud is between 1300 and 3000 years old” (Rogers 194).
Afterwards, Dr. Giulio Fanti, a mechanical and thermal measurements professor, carried out five
dating tests with six teams in six different laboratories and published his results in Il Mistero
Della Sindone in 2013. All Dr. Fanti’s tests dated it a little before Jesus’ death with a mean date
of “33 BC (+ or - 250 years)” at a “95% confidence level,” just as accurate as carbon-14 dating.
The STURP Investigation identified many characteristics that indicate the Shroud’s
authenticity. For instance, biophysicist Dr. John Heller and porphyrin expert Dr. Alan Adler
collected blood samples from the Shroud. In one of their peer-reviewed journals in Applied
Optics, Blood on the Shroud of Turin, they concluded, “The presence of whole blood was
evidence for the application of any pigments, stains, or dyes on the cloth to produce the image.”
4
In another journal, A chemical investigation of the Shroud of Turin, they concluded, “These
blood images generally represent clotted blood and not free blood flow…such a chemically and
anatomically correct representation produced by any means other than direct contact of the cloth
with a wounded human body is difficult to conceive” (96). Despite attempts to create a DNA
profile from the blood, the DNA has been too broken down over the centuries. However, various
researchers have determined that the DNA belonged to a human male, and the blood type is
AB-positive. Also, when an individual is severely tortured over an extended period of time, they
go into anaphylactic shock, causing the red blood cell walls to break down and the liver to flood
the bloodstream with bilirubin. Dr. Alan Adler found high levels of bilirubin in the blood. The
bloodstains also match Jesus’ unique crucifixion described in the gospels. Blood flow from the
head indicates a crown of thorns which was unique to Jesus for being mocked as the “King of the
Jews.” Plus, executed convicts were generally not wrapped in fine linens, and no other burial
shroud like this exists because they were always buried with a body and decomposed.
The Shroud has had a clear history since 1349 when French knight Geoffroi de Charny
presented it to a clergyman in Liery, France. It has a less-clear previous history. It likely passed
from Jerusalem to Edessa, Turkey. The Shroud image is believed to have been the base for all
iconography of Jesus first depicted in Edessa’s mandylion. It was then likely stolen out of
Istanbul during the Sack of Constantinople in 1204. During the STURP Investigation,
criminologist and pollen expert Dr. Max Frei, collected pollen grain samples from the Shroud
and confirmed that history. In Frei’s article, Identification and classification of the new pollen of
the Shroud, he compared the samples to pollen grains from the world’s largest botanical
museums. He concluded that of the 58 pollen grain types he collected, 45 are from plants
5
indigenous to Israel (13 exclusive to Israel), 6 from the Middle East (2 exclusive to Edessa,
Turkey, and 1 exclusive to Istanbul), the rest were from France and Italy.
An artifact related to the Shroud is the Sudarium of Oviedo, a 33 by 21in linen cloth with
messy blood stains and bodily fluids. In ancient Jewish burial custom, a cloth often wrapped the
head of the deceased before being wrapped in a shroud. This Sudarium resides in Oviedo, Spain,
and is believed to be the face cloth that the Apostle John described was rolled up and separate
from the Shroud in Jesus’ tomb (John 20:7). This sudarium has the same AB-positive blood type
as the Shroud which only 3.4% of the world’s population has. AB-positive blood is also the only
“Universal receiver” blood type. To Christians, this symbolizes that Christ can receive all. Dr.
Frei also took pollen samples from the Sudarium. He identified 13 pollen types, 9 indigenous to
Israel. According to an article by Emanuela Marinelli entitled, Pollen Grains on the Sudarium of
Oviedo, “Frei stressed, ‘The Acacia albida is typical for the Dead Sea area, and the Hyoscyamus
aureus still grows on the walls of the Old Citadel of Jerusalem. These two plants are represented
also on the Shroud’” (Marinelli). This Sudarium was likely separated from the Shroud in its early
history. It was taken out of Israel in 614 AD to Alexandria until Persian King Khosrau II invaded
Alexandria in 616 AD, and it was brought through Northern Africa to Spain.
In ancient burial custom, coins were placed on the eyelids of the dead to keep them from
opening from rigor mortis. Professor Robert Haralick, a computer imaging expert, in Analysis of
Digital Images of the Shroud of Turin published by spatial Data analysis Laboratory, uncovered
OUCAIC on the eyelids of the man, this is part of the word TIBERIOUCAICAROS which
translates to “Tiberius,” for Tiberius Caesar Augustus the Roman emperor from 14-37 AD.
Haralick also identified a lituus/augur’s wand, a spiral staff which was a Roman pagan symbol.
The only coins in the history of the Roman Empire with those characteristics are Jewish lepta
6
minted by Pontius Pilate (the governor who crucified Jesus) in 29 AD in Jerusalem for the people
of Judea, likely the same as the widow’s copper coins in Mark 12:41-44 and Luke 21:1-4. Duke
University professor Dr. Alan Whanger published a journal in Applied Optics, Polarized Image
Overlay Technique. Whanger concluded, “Using the forensic criteria for matching fingerprints,
we feel that there is overwhelming evidence for the identification of the images and the matches
with the coins.” Needless to say, it would have taken a very sly medieval forger to come up with
that one.
Characteristics of the man on the Shroud make it more realistic than artwork. For
instance, artists usually do not depict Jesus’ scourging. The Shroud shows scourge wounds all
over his body, particularly in the same size and shape as the Roman flagrum, a three-strand whip
with metal dumbbells the Romans used. Also, there are virtually no nude depictions of Jesus
before the Renaissance as he is on the Shroud. Even more unique, he has a piercing through his
wrist. Artists have always depicted Jesus with nails in his palms because the gospels say he had
nail prints in his hands. However, that is translated from the Greek word, Χέρι (cheir), which
includes the hand and wrist. Deputy coroner and forensic pathologist Dr. Robert Bucklin
analyzed the Shroud image. He said, “The structures in the hand are too fragile to hold the
weight of a man, particularly of this size.” Historically, the Romans nailed convicts in the center
of their wrists behind the transverse carpal ligament to hold their body. The nail would pierce
directly through the median nerve, which runs through the whole arm, causing excruciating
shock sensations. Also, the median nerve controls the thumb, which explains why Jesus’ thumbs
are folded under his hands in the image. Also, French physician Dr. Peirre Barbet and many
others studied the image and determined that the man’s body is “Anatomically perfect.” It was
not until over a century after the Shroud was first documented in 1349 that Renaissance artists
7
like Michelangelo, Leonardo Da Vinci, and Sandro Botticelli studied the human body to depict
more accurate representations. Medieval paintings have obvious flaws in anatomy. A forger
would have had to be highly knowledgeable of history and anatomy to pull this off.
Over half of the STURP members have passed away. However, I was lucky to interview
one of the youngest members, Barrie Schwortz, the documenting photographer for the team. He
is now 75 and is a well-known Shroud expert. However, he told me, “When I was first asked to
be on the team, I immediately said no. I assumed it was some painted religious relic, but then I
thought, ‘hmmm…free trip to Italy.’” Schwortz says he was very skeptical of the Shroud, “I said,
‘give us five minutes; we’ll see the paint and brush strokes and go home.’ So the first thing I did
when I got to Turin was I took my magnifying glass out and I started looking for brush strokes,
but I couldn’t see any. Then our team started eliminating the possibility of a painting, scorch,
photograph, and to this day, no one has replicated the physical and chemical properties on the
Shroud.” He told me that eighteen years after the STURP team, he was finally convinced that the
Shroud was authentic, which rekindled his faith in God which he had lost when he was thirteen.
Schowrtz says that besides his family, the Shroud research has been the most fulfilling part of his
life, “I would have never thought that 44 years later, I would still dedicate my life to archiving
the Shroud research.” Schwortz has appeared in documentaries about the Shroud on the History
Channel, Discovery Channel, National Geographic Channel, and has done lectures around the
world. He also founded Shroud.com, the oldest and most extensive Shroud resource online.
So, how did 3D negative images get on Jesus’ burial Shroud? Dr. Raymond Rogers
noted, “No evidence for [artificial] pigments or media (the work of artists like brush strokes) was
found.” Also, the STURP team discovered that the image is not from the blood either. Rather the
image rests on 1 to 2 of the uppermost fibrils which makes the Shroud image very unique. A
8
single thread has about 200 fibrils. The STURP team determined that the image was produced
by, “A discoloration due to rapid dehydration.” Therefore, it was produced by radiation, but not
heat radiation/scorching because the STURP team placed the Shroud under UV fluorescence
which causes sourcing to fluoresce. The only part of the Shroud that showed fluorescence were
the scorch lines from the fire. Plus, sourcing would also easily penetrate to the center of the
cloth. Instead, the Shroud was produced by a light radiation source, and a very intense one
because linen is a non-photographically sensitive cloth. Dr. John Jackson hypothesized that the
best source of light radiation to reproduce to image would be vacuum ultraviolet radiation. He
said it “Would be absorbed at the surface of the fibrils, which would leave the medullas
unique type of light, different from sunlight due to its intense short wavelengths.
Dr. Jackson’s hypothesis was tested in 2010 by a team of six physicists led by Paolo Di
Lazzaro. They irradiated linen fabric with the same absolute spectral reflectance as the Shroud
with nanosecond pulses from an ArF excimer laser, a powerful laser only used in laboratories
which emits vacuum ultraviolet radiation. The team published their findings in an Applied Optics
journal entitled, Deep Ultraviolet Radiation Simulates the Turin Shroud Image. They concluded,
“We have shown that 12 nanosecond, 193 nm laser pulses are able to color a very thin layer on
the linen yarn…this is the first coloration of a linen material resembling the very shallow depth
of coloration observed in the Turin Shroud fibers” (6). In a National Geographic article Paolo Di
Lazzaro said one laser would not be enough to produce a full body image, “‘[The ultraviolet light
necessary to form the image] exceeds the maximum power released by all ultraviolet light
sources available today’ says Di Lazzaro. It would require ‘pulses having durations shorter than
9
one forty-billionth of a second, and intensities on the order of several billion watts’” (Viviano). It
would have to be that short so the light would not fry the cloth. How did a medieval forger get
access to billions of watts of precise light energy that we do not even have today?
Characteristics Found on the Shroud Image, he wrote, “The finger bones are visible well into the
palm of the hands, extending right up to the base of the wrist…It thus seems as though we are
looking at the internal skeletal structure of the hand” (Jackson). Also, the STURP team removed
the backing cloth and discovered a third image on the other side of the frontal image, a more
intense image nearest the body, and a fainter but identical image on the either side. Dr. Jackson
suggests this might imply that the radiation that created the image was emanating equally from
every point from the dead body the Shroud was wrapped in, and that body passed through the
cloth to capture the skeletal image in the hand and create the identical image on the other side.
Since probably no forger had access to billions of watts of precise light energy, perhaps
only the second option remains; the Shroud verifies what the New Testament writers reported,
Jesus’ unique crucifixion and resurrection in a glorified spiritual body. His resurrection created
3D negative images of his crucified body on his burial shroud. It is no surprise that much light
radiated from him. The apostle Paul was a Pharisee and persecutor of Christians, but suddenly
converted on the road to Damascus by what he believed was the risen Jesus with intense light
emanating from him. Also, in the gospels, Jesus, like many rabbis of his time, used figures of
speech to teach his disciples, like metaphors, parables, allegories, similes, and hyperboles. One
metaphor he used to describe himself in John’s gospel was light (John 8:12, 9:5, 12:35).
Aside from the Shroud, Dr. Gary Habermas, a historian and leading New Testament
scholar, is known for his “Minimal Facts Approach.” He says there is enough historical data to
10
suggest Jesus rose from the dead. This data is backed by so much historical evidence that even
skeptical atheist/agnostic scholars accept as fact. The facts include: 1. Jesus died by crucifixion.
2. After his death, his disciples had experiences they believed were appearances of the risen
Jesus. 3. The disciples were transformed from fearful panic to boldly preaching his resurrection
and were willing to die for their beliefs. 4. The resurrection was proclaimed very early in
Jerusalem, not decades later. 5./6. James the brother of Jesus, a skeptical relative of Jesus, and
Paul, a persecutor of Christians, suddenly converted by what they believed was a literal
appearance of the risen Jesus. Also, about 75% of skeptical scholars accept that Jesus’ tomb was
empty. Habermas says, “These six facts all strongly support the resurrection, skeptics admit these
facts, and I think by far the best explanation for the six is that Jesus rose from the dead.”
This is partly because scholars unanimously agree that of the 13 books in the New
Testament that bear Paul’s name, at least Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1
Thessalonians, and Philemon were authentically written by him. Since Paul was converted to
Christianity 1 to 3 years after Jesus’ crucifixion, there are dozens of verses in his letters called
“Early creeds” that he got from others which date before his conversion. Most are about Jesus’
death, deity, and resurrection. For instance, in 54 AD, Paul wrote to the Corinthians:
“For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins
according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to
the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas (Peter), and then to the Twelve. After that, he
appeared to more than five hundred brothers and sisters at the same time, most of whom are still
living, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles,” then
Paul adds to the creed, “and last of all he appeared to me.” 1 Corinthians 15:3-9.
This passage translated in Greek has a distinct rhythm, like a jingle or slogan. Up to 90% of
Jesus’ audience were illiterate, so creeds like this were made for them to remember and preach.
Even the world’s leading skeptical scholar Bart Erhman accepts that this passage can be dated no
later than 1 to 2 years after Jesus’ crucifixion. Other scholars date this creed just months after.
11
From the beginning, Jesus’ disciples risked their lives preaching. Also, Cornelius Tacitus
(mentioned earlier) recorded what Nero inflicted on anyone who professed their faith in Jesus
after Rome’s fire in 64 AD. He wrote, “An arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty…an
immense multitude was convicted…Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered
with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were
doomed to the flames and burnt” (Tacitus XV, 46). Moreover, Christian tradition says nearly all
of the apostles were martyred. There are at least early extra-Biblical sources that attest that Nero
had Paul beheaded in 64-67 AD and Peter crucified in 64 AD; and High Priest Ananus had
James stoned to death in 62-69 AD. Usually when someone is willing to lay down their life for a
cause it is for an ideology they got from someone else, but many disciples were willing to die for
something they saw, and a person they knew. What convinced so many people that they had all
seen a resurrected man? Skeptical scholars’ most popular explanation is that all the appearances
Paul listed were hallucinations. Regardless, it was the resurrection appearances that grounded
and fueled Christianity. Paul wrote, “If Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain,
your faith also is in vain” 1 Corinthians 15:14. Jesus’ collection of peasant followers preached
his message in defiance of oppressive government authorities, religious leaders, and an empire.
The early Christians embraced Jesus’ message, which for the first 300 years, brought them
suffering, poverty, and death. Against all odds, Christianity, founded by an obscure carpenter,
Without this historical and archaeological evidence, I would not be a Christian. Still, I
need faith, because evidence can always be ignored or denied. So, we must take a leap of faith
either way. I chose to take a leap of faith to Christ rather than a leap of faith away from him. C.S.
Lewis illustrates his leap of faith beautifully in his book, Surprised by Joy, which chronicles his
12
conversion to Christianity. He wrote, “Before God closed in on me, I was in fact offered what
now appears a moment of wholly free choice. I could open the door or keep it shut; I could
unbuckle the armor or keep it on. I chose to open, to unbuckle, to loosen the rein” (Lewis 174).
In English, people often define “faith” as something one just believes, but Christianity is not
about accepting it as an arbitrary fact. It is about commitment to God and Christ. Faith in the
Bible is translated from the Hebrew word, ( אמונהenumah) which means “Done in a committed
manner” and ( אמוemun) which means “Trust.” C.S. Lewis once said, “Christianity, if false, is of
no importance, and if true, of infinite importance. The only thing it cannot be is moderately
important.” If it is true, that means we are morally responsible for everything we do. We are all
answerable to a higher power, but there is also redemption and salvation for humanity because of
13