Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Good For Society Argument by Chapter
Good For Society Argument by Chapter
Foreword by Rt Hon Lord Tebbit CH, former Secretary of State for Employment, Secretary of State
for Trade and Industry and Chairman of the Conservative Party
In "Good for Society" Martin Parsons has written a book well worthy of its sub title "Christian Values
and Conservative Politics"…
…Good for Society is a robust defence of both our Christian heritage and the Conservative Party.
Perhaps it might have been subtitled "You Cannot Beat Something with Nothing". After all, it might
not be entirely a coincidence that not only have both of the outstanding Prime Ministers of the last
half century been women, but convinced Christians too.
Introduction
Conservativism is one of the great ideas of the English-speaking peoples. The idea that we could
learn from the past, that we could develop learning, social organisations such as marriage and the
family and ways of doing things that meant that we did not have to reinvent the wheel every
generation with all its frustrations, disappointments and pain. But Conservativism cannot work on its
own. At least throughout almost the entire history of the English-speaking peoples it has not done so
on its own. Rather, it has required values drawn from the Judaeo-Christian worldview as its
foundation. However, these values are now under threat and it is only by recovering our confidence
in them that we can provide a credible counter narrative to the threat of Islamism.
Government and politics are not a necessary evil, they are ordained by God to bring a degree of
order, peace and justice to the world. The Bible portrays both the government of God and his divine
delegation of divine authority to man to govern. Whilst the central message of the Bible is one of
God restoring individuals to a right relationship with himself, it also sets out a vision of how society
functions best for human flourishing regardless of whether people make a personal response to the
former. These principles cannot simplistically be reapplied today, but require careful
recontextualization of the underlying ideals to the modern world. However, this leads to a range of
possible politics for Christians. Whilst some may be closer to these ideals than others, there cannot
be a single ‘Christian’ political position. However, as conservatism is about conserving the best of the
past, and much of that has been significantly influenced by the outworking of Christian values, it is
closer to these ideals than either liberalism or labour politics and can therefore be said to be ‘Good
for society’.
This sets out how conservative principles emerged from the time of Pitt the Younger and Edmund
Burke, partly in response to the French revolution. These principles, which spread to other parts of
the English speaking world such as Australia, Canada and New Zealand, are contrasted with those
which evolved from liberalism and labour politics.
Chapter 3 the political landscape and Christian values
There have always been two broad streams of conservativism: one based on both Christian
principles and an argument that these values should be conserved as they have historically proved
to be are good for society and a second based solely on the latter pragmatic argument. Additionally,
for most of the last two centuries conservatives have understood Christian values to be of
foundational importance to the UK’s national identity and values. This view was strongly articulated
by among others Winston Churchill and Margaret Thatcher. In contrast both liberalism and labour
politics have always been based on overtly secular philosophies, even though in the late nineteenth
and early twentieth centuries these were ameliorated through the influence of nonconformists.
Islamism takes its inspiration from the political aspects of early Islamic history including jihad, the
creation of a global Islamic state governed by a caliphate and the enforcement of sharia. It therefore
represents a significant challenge to the values of the English speaking peoples. Colonial rule of
Muslim majority areas led to two divergent responses. First, a focus on devotional Islam which
sometimes overtly embraced the values of the English speaking peoples and secondly, Islamism. This
seeks to spread Islamic government with sharia enforcement across the world, either through use of
the political process (non violent Islamists) or violence (jihadists). In recent years this has led to an
increasing number of countries adopting various aspects of sharia enforcement, the reintroduction
of aspects of sharia that were formally dormant such as slavery and jihadist attacks on religious
minorities that threaten the very existence of Christianity in areas of the Middle East where it has
existed since the first century. The Islamist challenge is not simply that of an alternative political
idea. It represents an existential threat to the very existence of the type of free society that the
English speaking peoples have developed over many centuries.
The Common law and much later parliamentary law was based on a number Judaeo-Christian
principles such as one law applying equally to all including the government, individual responsibility
for one’s own actions, truth, good faith, concern for one’s neighbour, limitations on the power of
government to protect human rights, respect for personal property and the institution of marriage.
It was normal for common law judgements to be made on the basis of Judaeo-Christian ethics,
sometimes explicitly so. Central to this was the common law principle set out by Henry of Bracton in
the thirteenth century that ‘the king is under no man save God and the law’ which became central to
later constitutional developments in England and elsewhere. These also became important aspects
of conservativism, but are now being challenged by both liberalism and Islamism.
The Judeo-Christian belief in the intrinsic worth of all people because they are made in the image of
God was foundational to understanding of social justice from the time of Alfred the Great and led to
a wide range of social reforms including the abolition of slavery pioneered by the Tory MP William
Wilberforce and factory reforms led by Shaftesbury. The Judaeo-Christian worldview also led to
inculcation of virtues such as kindness and generosity which led to the development of charity and
continue to be central to the delivery of health and social care. In relation to welfare they are based
on avoidance of dependency giving those in need a helping hand back up, rather than a permanent
handout. Over time these values have become central to Conservativism’s approach to social justice,
which aims at a meritocratic society based on equality of opportunity. However, they are challenged
on the one hand by well intentioned efforts of the liberal left to give permanent welfare handouts
and create equality of outcomes by treating some groups more ‘positively’ than others. They are also
challenged less subtly by Islamism with sharia giving Muslims significantly greater rights than non
Muslims.
Marriage has historically been the foundation of family life and family the basis of society.
Conservatives believe in marriage not just because it is an established institution, but because
repeated studies have shown it provides the most stable relationship for children to grow up in.
Whilst marriage has become increasingly secular it has still retained its basic Judaeo-Christian
definition. However, this is now being increasingly challenged by both Islamists and liberals.
Education is primarily the responsibility of parents, though they may choose to delegate some
aspects to bodies such as the state or church. It is not simply about training for work but also about
the inculcation of virtues, wisdom, and the transmission of identity – including national identity, civic
and social obligations and giving each generation access to the accumulated wealth of knowledge
and wisdom we have acquired from previous generations.
Conservativism is about conserving the best of the past, passing on what we have inherited to the next
generation. Yet this raises the question of what we should conserve? Conservativism cannot simply be
about conserving things for as long as we can, before they eventually slip from our grasp. This is
defeatist as it simply allows the proponents of other ideologies, such as socialism, liberalism and even
Islamism to set the direction of travel. Conservativism needs a set of principles. As we have seen
throughout the book so much of what is good in our society has been derived from the outworking of
Judaeo-Christian principles throughout our history. In particular, this has led to the emergence of a set
of historic national values which have become embedded in our legal and political institutions and
spread out across the English speaking world. These are not only central to our national identity and
values, they also represent our greatest contribution to the world. As such their promotion should be
central to our role on the world stage.