Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 1 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
* SECOND DIVISION.
459
paragraph (e), the appellantÊs brief must include „[a] clear and
concise statement of the issues of fact or law to be submitted to the
court for its judgment[.]‰
Same; Same; Courts; Jurisdiction; On the jurisdiction issue,
jurisdiction over the subject matter is conferred by law.·On the
jurisdiction issue, jurisdiction over the subject matter is conferred
by law. Batas Pambansa Blg. 129, otherwise known as The
Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980, is one such law that provides
for the jurisdiction of our courts. A plain reading of Section 19
shows that civil actions for payment of sum of money are within the
exclusive original jurisdiction of trial courts: SEC. 19. Jurisdiction
in civil cases.·Regional Trial Courts shall exercise exclusive
original jurisdiction:
. . . . (8) In all other cases in which the demand, exclusive of
interest, damages of whatever kind, attorneyÊs fees, litigation
expenses, and costs or the value of the property in controversy
exceeds One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000) or, in such other
cases in Metro Manila, where the demand, exclusive of the
abovementioned items exceeds Two hundred thousand pesos
(P200,000). These jurisdictional amounts were adjusted to
P300,000.00, and P400,000.00 in the case of Metro Manila. Thus,
the Regional Trial Court of Pasig has jurisdiction over respondentÊs
complaint for recovery of the sum of Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
3,915,053.54.
Courts; Conflicts of Law; Forum Non Conveniens; Words and
Phrases; „Forum non conveniens literally translates to Âthe forum is
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 2 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
460
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 3 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
one to which the parties may conveniently resort to; (2) that the
Philippine Court is in a position to make an intelligent decision as to
the law and the facts; and (3) that the Philippine Court has or is
likely to have power to enforce its decision.‰·Courts may choose to
assume jurisdiction subject to the following requisites: „(1) that the
Philippine Court is one to which the parties may conveniently
resort to; (2) that the Philippine Court is in a position to make an
intelligent decision as to the law and the facts; and (3) that the
Philippine Court has or is likely to have power to enforce its
decision.‰
Same; Same; Same; A mere invocation of the doctrine of forum
non conveniens or an easy averment that foreign elements exist
cannot operate to automatically divest a court of its jurisdiction.·
The determination of whether to entertain a case is addressed to
the sound discretion of the court, which must carefully consider the
facts of the particular case. A mere invocation of the doctrine of
forum non conveniens or an easy averment that foreign elements
exist cannot operate to automatically divest a court of its
jurisdiction. It is crucial for courts to determine first if facts were
established such that special circumstances exist to warrant its
desistance from assuming jurisdiction.
Same; Same; Same; It is unexpected that a Philippine
corporation would rather engage this civil suit before Malaysian
courts. Our courts would be „better positioned to enforce [the]
judgment and, ultimately, to dispense‰ in this case against
petitioner.·The trial
461
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 4 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
462
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 5 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 6 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
463
LEONEN, J.:
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 7 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
1 Rollo, pp. 38-77. The Petition was filed pursuant to Rule 45 of the
Rules of Court.
464
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 8 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
465
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 9 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
466
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 10 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
467
3. Cost of suit.
SO ORDERED.23
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 11 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
468
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 12 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 13 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
469
_______________
39 Id., at p. 64.
40 Id., at p. 66.
41 Id.
42 Id.
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 14 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
43 Id., at p. 70.
44 Id., at p. 71.
45 Id.
46 Id.
47 Id., at p. 223.
470
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 15 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
471
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 16 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
I.
On the procedural issue, petitioner submits that the
Court of Appeals erred in finding that only questions of law
were raised.61
_______________
56 Id., at p. 238.
57 Id.
58 Id.
59 Id., at p. 53.
60 Id., at pp. 53-54.
61 Id., at p. 56.
472
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 17 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
II.
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 18 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
474
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 19 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
475
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 20 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
476
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 21 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 22 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
477
and the bonds and other contracts on which they were based, were
clearly identified in the complaint as follows:....83
III.
Petitioner raised only two errors before the Court of
Appeals.86 First, the trial court had no jurisdiction over the
subject matter of the case, and it would be more convenient
for both parties if the case was heard in the forum where
the contracts were executed and performed.87 Second,
petitioner was deprived of its day in court.88
Petitioner raised these contentions before the trial court
in its Motion to Lift Order of Default with Affidavit of
Merit dated December 9, 199489 and Motion for
Reconsideration Ad Cautelam dated December 21, 1994.90
These were the same two errors it elevated to the Court of
Appeals in its Brief.9
_______________
83 Id., at p. 219.
84 Id., at p. 135.
85 Id., at pp. 145-146.
86 Id., at p. 162, PNCCÊs Brief.
87 Id., at p. 163.
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 23 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
88 Id., at p. 165.
89 Id., at pp. 133 and 139.
90 Id., at pp. 144-145.
91 Id., at pp. 163-165.
478
_______________
92 Magno v. People, 662 Phil. 726, 735; 647 SCRA 362, 371 (2011) [Per
J. Brion, Third Division], citing Machado v. Gatdula, 626 Phil. 457, 468;
612 SCRA 546, 559 (2010) [Per J. Brion, Second Division], citing in turn
Vargas v. Caminas, 577 Phil. 185, 197-198; 554 SCRA 305, 317 (2008)
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 24 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
479
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 25 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
480
1) The belief that the matter can be better tried and decided
elsewhere, either because the main aspects of the case transpired in
a foreign jurisdiction or the material witnesses have their residence
there;
2) The belief that the nonresident plaintiff sought the forum[,] a
practice known as forum shopping[,] merely to secure procedural
advantages or to convey or harass the defendant;
3) The unwillingness to extend local judicial facilities to
nonresidents or aliens when the docket may already be
overcrowded;
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 26 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
99 405 Phil. 413; 352 SCRA 738 (2001) [Per J. Panganiban, Third
Division].
100 Id., at p. 432; p. 751, citing Salonga, Jovito R., Private
International Law, p. 47 (1979).
101 Bank of America NT&SA v. Court of Appeals, supra note 97 at p.
196; p. 169, citing Communication Materials and Design, Inc. v. Court of
Appeals, 329 Phil. 487, 510-511; 260 SCRA 673, 695 (1996) [Per J. Torres,
Jr., Second Division].
481
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 27 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
482
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 28 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
107 Id.
108 Id., at pp. 167-168.
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 29 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
483
IV.
_______________
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 30 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
109 Rollo, p. 211, Asiavest MerchantÊs Brief, quoting the trial court
Order dated August 11, 1995, Annex B of appellantÊs Brief, pp. 3-4.
110 Saudi Arabian Airlines (Saudia) v. Rebesencio, supra note 96 at
p. 164.
111 Id., at p. 168.
484
_______________
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 31 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
112 See Pasiona, Jr. v. Court of Appeals, 581 Phil. 124, 135-136; 559
SCRA 137, 148 (2008) [Per J. Austria-Martinez, Third Division], Dela
Cruz v. Andres, 550 Phil. 679, 684; 522 SCRA 585, 590 (2007) [Per J.
Quisumbing, Second Division], and Arroyo v. Rosal Homeowners
Association, Inc., G.R. No. 175155, October 22, 2012, 684 SCRA 297, 303-
304 [Per J. Mendoza, Third Division].
113 National Association of Electricity Consumers for Reforms, Inc.
(NASECORE) v. Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC), 669 Phil. 93,
105; 653 SCRA 642, 654-655 (2011) [Per J. Sereno (now CJ.), Second
Division], citing Samalio v. Court of Appeals, 494 Phil. 456, 466; 454
SCRA 462, 473 (2005) [Per J. Corona, En Banc].
114 Rollo, p. 82, Court of Appeals Decision.
115 Id., at p. 133.
485
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 32 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
486
V.
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 33 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
487
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 34 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
_______________
124 ATCI Overseas Corporation v. Echin, 647 Phil. 43, 49-50; 632
SCRA 528, 534-535 (2010) [Per J. Carpio-Morales, Third Division],
quoting EDI-Staffbuilders International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations
Commission, 563 Phil. 1, 22; 537 SCRA 409, 430 (2007) [Per J. Velasco,
Jr., Second Division].
488
VI.
_______________
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 36 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
489
Petition denied.
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 37 of 38
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 767 Copy 3/8/22, 11:10 PM
··o0o··
_______________
129 See Reburiano v. Court of Appeals, 361 Phil. 294, 304; 301 SCRA
342, 351 (1999) [Per J. Mendoza, Second Division].
** Designated additional member per S.O. No. 2146 dated August 10,
2015.
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017f6a15d375c73fe702000d00d40059004a/p/ATK097/?username=Guest Page 38 of 38