AGT-B

LAPORAN MINGGUAN

RANCANGAN PERCOBAAN

RANCANGAN ACAK LENGKAP FAKTORIAL

OLEH:

RIDWAN HASIM

2006110868

ASISTEN:

1. FERDI SAPUTRA

2. VINA FEBRIYANTI

JURUSAN AGROTEKNOLOGI

FAKULTAS PERTANIAN UNIVERSITAS RIAU

PEKANBARU

2022
 I. DATA INPUT

Perlakuan pupuk hijau yang dikombinasukan dengan limbah cair ampas sagu
terhadap serapan unsur N dan pertumbuhan dari tanaman bawang merah

BOBOT
PERLAKUA ULANGA SERAPA BERAT
UMBI PER
N N N UMBI BASA
PLOT

T1NI 1 0.28 370 17.05

T1N1 2 0.1 220 20.51

T1N1 3 1.76 350 17.77

T1N2 1 0.35 325 28.76

T1N2 2 0.43 230 21.05

T1N2 3 0.42 350 33.97

T1N3 1 0.4 355 44.87

T1N3 2 0.49 330 49.89

T1N3 3 0.77 650 45.41

T2N1 1 0.6 190 21.66

T2N1 2 0.2 350 21.12

T2N1 3 0.5 430 31.27

T2N2 1 0.8 370 28.82

T2N2 2 0.67 440 17.54

T2N2 3 1.36 420 45.54

T2N3 1 0.65 325 34.64

T2N3 2 1.19 500 20.61

T2N3 3 1 530 33.95

T3N1 1 0.6 505 18.78

T3N1 2 0.58 500 37.74

T3N1 3 0.93 625 43.21

T3N2 1 0.2 610 21.89

T3N2 2 0.68 480 25.38

T3N2 3 0.78 455 53.75

T3N3 1 1.23 410 55.54

T3N3 2 2.45 570 43.87

T3N3 3 0.72 480 55.8

T4N1 1 1.66 500 63.68

T4N1 2 0.11 740 51.4

T4N1 3 2.8 600 44.88

T4N2 1 1.15 740 32.84

T4N2 2 0.75 580 26.56

T4N2 3 0.75 650 24.88

T4N3 1 1.4 1120 76.08

T4N3 2 1.82 1100 39.67

T4N3 3 2.92 790 97

 II. DATA OUTPUT
The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 1

The ANOVA Procedure

Class Level Information

Class Levels Values

tn 12 T1N1 T1N2 T1N3 T2N1 T2N2 T2N3 T3N1 T3N2 T3N3 T4N1 T4N2 T4N3

Number of observations 36

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 2

The ANOVA Procedure

Dependent Variable: sr

Sum of

Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 11 8.39785556 0.76344141 2.02 0.0729

Error 24 9.07833333 0.37826389

Corrected Total 35 17.47618889

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE sr Mean

 0.480531 66.09295 0.615032 0.930556

Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

tn 11 8.39785556 0.76344141 2.02 0.0729

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 3

The ANOVA Procedure

Dependent Variable: bupp

Sum of

Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 11 1234597.222 112236.111 9.33 <.0001

Error 24 288750.000 12031.250

Corrected Total 35 1523347.222

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE bupp Mean

0.810450 21.70827 109.6871 505.2778

Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

tn 11 1234597.222 112236.111 9.33 <.0001

 The SAS System 021:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 4

The ANOVA Procedure

Dependent Variable: bub

Sum of

Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 11 7506.99603 682.45418 4.52 0.0010

Error 24 3626.64073 151.11003

Corrected Total 35 11133.63676

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE bub Mean

0.674263 32.84447 12.29268 37.42694

Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

tn 11 7506.996031 682.454185 4.52 0.0010

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 5

The ANOVA Procedure

Duncan's Multiple Range Test for sr

 NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.

Alpha 0.05

Error Degrees of Freedom 24

Error Mean Square 0.378264

Number of Means 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Critical Range 1.036 1.089 1.122 1.146 1.163 1.177 1.188 1.197 1.204 1.210 1.214

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Duncan Grouping Mean N tn

A 2.0467 3 T4N3

B A 1.5233 3 T4N1

B A

B A 1.4667 3 T3N3

B A

B A 0.9467 3 T2N3

B A

B A 0.9433 3 T2N2

B 0.8833 3 T4N2

B 0.7133 3 T1N1

B 0.7033 3 T3N1
 B

B 0.5533 3 T3N2

B 0.5533 3 T1N3

B 0.4333 3 T2N1

B 0.4000 3 T1N2

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 6

The ANOVA Procedure

Duncan's Multiple Range Test for bupp

NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.

Alpha 0.05

Error Degrees of Freedom 24

Error Mean Square 12031.25

Number of Means 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Critical Range 184.8 194.1 200.1 204.3 207.5 209.9 211.8 213.4 214.7 215.7 216.6

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Duncan Grouping Mean N tn

 A 1003.33 3 T4N3

B 656.67 3 T4N2

C B 613.33 3 T4N1

C B

C B 543.33 3 T3N1

C B

C B D 515.00 3 T3N2

C B D

C E B D 486.67 3 T3N3

C E B D

C E B D 451.67 3 T2N3

C E D

C E D 445.00 3 T1N3

C E D

C E D 410.00 3 T2N2

E D

E D 323.33 3 T2N1

E D

E D 313.33 3 T1N1

E 301.67 3 T1N2

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 7

The ANOVA Procedure

Duncan's Multiple Range Test for bub

NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
 Alpha 0.05

Error Degrees of Freedom 24

Error Mean Square 151.11

Number of Means 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Critical Range 20.72 21.76 22.43 22.90 23.25 23.52 23.74 23.92 24.06 24.18 24.27

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Duncan Grouping Mean N tn

A 70.92 3 T4N3

B A 53.32 3 T4N1

B A

B A C 51.73 3 T3N3

B C

B D C 46.72 3 T1N3

B D C

B E D C 33.67 3 T3N2

B E D C

B E D C 33.24 3 T3N1

B E D C

B E D C 30.63 3 T2N2

E D C

E D C 29.73 3 T2N3

E D

E D 28.09 3 T4N2
 E D

E D 27.93 3 T1N2

E D

E D 24.68 3 T2N1

E 18.44 3 T1N1

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 8

The ANOVA Procedure

Class Level Information

Class Levels Values

tn 12 T1N1 T1N2 T1N3 T2N1 T2N2 T2N3 T3N1 T3N2 T3N3 T4N1 T4N2 T4N3

Number of observations 36

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 9

The ANOVA Procedure

Dependent Variable: sr

Sum of

Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 11 8.39785556 0.76344141 2.02 0.0729

Error 24 9.07833333 0.37826389

 Corrected Total 35 17.47618889

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE sr Mean

0.480531 66.09295 0.615032 0.930556

Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

tn 11 8.39785556 0.76344141 2.02 0.0729

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 10

The ANOVA Procedure

Dependent Variable: bupp

Sum of

Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 11 1234597.222 112236.111 9.33 <.0001

Error 24 288750.000 12031.250

Corrected Total 35 1523347.222

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE bupp Mean

0.810450 21.70827 109.6871 505.2778

 Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

tn 11 1234597.222 112236.111 9.33 <.0001

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 11

The ANOVA Procedure

Dependent Variable: bub

Sum of

Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 11 7506.99603 682.45418 4.52 0.0010

Error 24 3626.64073 151.11003

Corrected Total 35 11133.63676

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE bub Mean

0.674263 32.84447 12.29268 37.42694

Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

tn 11 7506.996031 682.454185 4.52 0.0010

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 12

 The ANOVA Procedure

Tukey's Studentized Range (HSD) Test for sr

NOTE: This test controls the Type I experimentwise error rate, but it generally has a higher Type II error rate than REGWQ.

Alpha 0.05

Error Degrees of Freedom 24

Error Mean Square 0.378264

Critical Value of Studentized Range 5.09913

Minimum Significant Difference 1.8106

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Tukey Grouping Mean N tn

A 2.0467 3 T4N3

A 1.5233 3 T4N1

A 1.4667 3 T3N3

A 0.9467 3 T2N3

A 0.9433 3 T2N2

A 0.8833 3 T4N2

A
 A 0.7133 3 T1N1

A 0.7033 3 T3N1

A 0.5533 3 T3N2

A 0.5533 3 T1N3

A 0.4333 3 T2N1

A 0.4000 3 T1N2

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 13

The ANOVA Procedure

Tukey's Studentized Range (HSD) Test for bupp

NOTE: This test controls the Type I experimentwise error rate, but it generally has a higher Type II error rate than REGWQ.

Alpha 0.05

Error Degrees of Freedom 24

Error Mean Square 12031.25

Critical Value of Studentized Range 5.09913

Minimum Significant Difference 322.92

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Tukey Grouping Mean N tn

 A 1003.33 3 T4N3

B 656.67 3 T4N2

C B 613.33 3 T4N1

C B

C B 543.33 3 T3N1

C B

C B 515.00 3 T3N2

C B

C B 486.67 3 T3N3

C B

C B 451.67 3 T2N3

C B

C B 445.00 3 T1N3

C B

C B 410.00 3 T2N2

C 323.33 3 T2N1

C 313.33 3 T1N1

C 301.67 3 T1N2

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 14

The ANOVA Procedure

Tukey's Studentized Range (HSD) Test for bub

NOTE: This test controls the Type I experimentwise error rate, but it generally has a higher Type II error rate than REGWQ.
 Alpha 0.05

Error Degrees of Freedom 24

Error Mean Square 151.11

Critical Value of Studentized Range 5.09913

Minimum Significant Difference 36.189

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Tukey Grouping Mean N tn

A 70.92 3 T4N3

B A 53.32 3 T4N1

B A

B A 51.73 3 T3N3

B A

B A 46.72 3 T1N3

B 33.67 3 T3N2

B 33.24 3 T3N1

B 30.63 3 T2N2

B 29.73 3 T2N3

B 28.09 3 T4N2

B
 B 27.93 3 T1N2

B 24.68 3 T2N1

B 18.44 3 T1N1

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 15

The ANOVA Procedure

Class Level Information

Class Levels Values

tn 12 T1N1 T1N2 T1N3 T2N1 T2N2 T2N3 T3N1 T3N2 T3N3 T4N1 T4N2 T4N3

Number of observations 36

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 16

The ANOVA Procedure

Dependent Variable: sr

Sum of

Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 11 8.39785556 0.76344141 2.02 0.0729

Error 24 9.07833333 0.37826389

 Corrected Total 35 17.47618889

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE sr Mean

0.480531 66.09295 0.615032 0.930556

Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

tn 11 8.39785556 0.76344141 2.02 0.0729

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 17

The ANOVA Procedure

Dependent Variable: bupp

Sum of

Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 11 1234597.222 112236.111 9.33 <.0001

Error 24 288750.000 12031.250

Corrected Total 35 1523347.222

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE bupp Mean

0.810450 21.70827 109.6871 505.2778

 Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

tn 11 1234597.222 112236.111 9.33 <.0001

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 18

The ANOVA Procedure

Dependent Variable: bub

Sum of

Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 11 7506.99603 682.45418 4.52 0.0010

Error 24 3626.64073 151.11003

Corrected Total 35 11133.63676

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE bub Mean

0.674263 32.84447 12.29268 37.42694

Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

tn 11 7506.996031 682.454185 4.52 0.0010

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 19

 The ANOVA Procedure

t Tests (LSD) for sr

NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.

Alpha 0.05

Error Degrees of Freedom 24

Error Mean Square 0.378264

Critical Value of t 2.06390

Least Significant Difference 1.0364

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

t Grouping Mean N tn

A 2.0467 3 T4N3

B A 1.5233 3 T4N1

B A

B A C 1.4667 3 T3N3

B C

B D C 0.9467 3 T2N3

B D C

B D C 0.9433 3 T2N2

B D C

B D C 0.8833 3 T4N2

B D C

B D C 0.7133 3 T1N1
 B D C

B D C 0.7033 3 T3N1

B D C

B D C 0.5533 3 T3N2

B D C

B D C 0.5533 3 T1N3

D C

D C 0.4333 3 T2N1

D 0.4000 3 T1N2

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 20

The ANOVA Procedure

t Tests (LSD) for bupp

NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.

Alpha 0.05

Error Degrees of Freedom 24

Error Mean Square 12031.25

Critical Value of t 2.06390

Least Significant Difference 184.84

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

t Grouping Mean N tn
 A 1003.33 3 T4N3

B 656.67 3 T4N2

C B 613.33 3 T4N1

C B

C B D 543.33 3 T3N1

C B D

C B D 515.00 3 T3N2

C B D

C E B D 486.67 3 T3N3

C E D

C E F D 451.67 3 T2N3

C E F D

C E F D 445.00 3 T1N3

E F D

E F D 410.00 3 T2N2

E F

E F 323.33 3 T2N1

E F

E F 313.33 3 T1N1

F 301.67 3 T1N2

The SAS System 02:12 Wednesday, April 21, 2022 21

The ANOVA Procedure

t Tests (LSD) for bub

NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
 Alpha 0.05

Error Degrees of Freedom 24

Error Mean Square 151.11

Critical Value of t 2.06390

Least Significant Difference 20.715

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

t Grouping Mean N tn

A 70.92 3 T4N3

B A 53.32 3 T4N1

B A

B A 51.73 3 T3N3

B C 46.72 3 T1N3

B C

B C D 33.67 3 T3N2

B C D

B C D 33.24 3 T3N1

C D

C D 30.63 3 T2N2

C D

C D 29.73 3 T2N3

C D

C D 28.09 3 T4N2

C D

C D 27.93 3 T1N2
D

D 24.68 3 T2N1

D 18.44 3 T1N1
 I. TABEL ANOVA

I.1. TABEL ANOVA SR

F table
D
Source B JK KT F hit 1% 5%

Perlakuan 11 8.397856 0.763441 2.02ns 2.802561 2.074956

Galat 24 9.078333 0.3782639      

Total 35 17.47619        

) non
ns

signifikan

Fhit < Ftable = H0 diterima H1 ditolak

Coeff var = 66.09 % (DUNCAN)

KK>10%

I.2. TABEL ANOVA BUPP

F table
D
Source B JK KT F hit 1% 5%

Perlakuan 11 1234597 112236.1 9.33 2.802561 2.074956

Galat 24 288750 12031.25      

Total 35 1523347        

) non
ns

signifikan

Fhit > Ftable = H1 diterima H0 ditolak

Coeff var = 21.70 % (DUNCAN)

KK>10%
II. TABEL HASIL

II.1. TABEL HASIL SR

Perlakuan Serapan

T4N3 2.0467a

T4N1 1.5233ab

T3N3 1.4667ab

T2N3 0.9467ab

T2N2 0.9433ab

T4N2 0.8833b

T1N1 0.7133b

T3N1 0.7033b

T3N2 0.5533b

T1N3 0.5533b

T2N1 0.4333b

T1N2 0.4000b

*) ket: angka-angka yang diikuti oleh huruf a dan b kecil berarti tidak memiliki
pengaruh yang berbeda nyata (non signifikan)

II.2. TABEL HASIL BUPP

Perlakuan Bobot Umbi

T4N3 1003.33a

T4N2 656.67b

T4N1 613.33bc

T3N1 543.33bc
 T3N2 515.00bcd

T3N3 486.67bcde

T2N3 451.67bcde

T1N3 445.00cde

T2N2 410.00cde

T2N1 323.33de

T1N1 313.33de

T1N2 301.67e

*) ket: angka-angka yang diikuti oleh huruf a kecil berarti memiliki pengaruh yang
berbeda nyata (signifikan), angka angka yang diikuti huruf b,c,dan d kecil berarti tidak
memiliki pengaruh yang berbeda nyata (non signifikan)

III. PEMBAHASAN

Pada penelitian ini yang menjadi tujuan utama adalah serapan unsur N dan pertumbuhan
tanaman bawang merah.

III.1. Pengaruh perlakuan terhadap serapan unsur N

Pada penelitan perlakuan kombinasi pupuk hijau dengan limbah cair ampas sagu
terhadap serapan N terdapat hipotesis:

H0 : Perlakuan kombinasi pupuk tidak berpengaruh nyata terhadap serapan unsur N.

H1 : Perlakuan kombinasi pupuk berpengaruh nyata terhadap serapan unsur N.

Dari table anova dapat dilihat bahwa Fhitung perlakuan lebih kecil daripada
Ftabel perlakuan, sehingga H0 perlakuan diterima dan H1 perlakuan ditolak, yang
berarti perlakuan kombinasi pupuk hijau dengan limbah cair ampas sagu tidak
berpengaruh nyata terhadap serapan unsur N.

KK yang didapat dari data Coeff var= 66.09% (>10% (Duncan))

 Berdasarkan hasil dari KK yang lebih besar dari 10% maka dilakukanlah uji lanjut
duncan.

III.2. Pemgaruh perlakuan terhadap pertumbuhan tanaman bawang merah

Pada penelitian perlakuan kombinasi pupuk hijau dengan limbah cair ampas sagu
terhadap pertumbuhan tanaman bawang merah terdapat hipotesis:

H0 : Perlakuan kombinasi pupuk tidak berpengaruh nyata terhadap pertumbuhan tanaman

bawang merah.

H1 : Perlakuan kombinasi pupuk berpengaruh nyata terhadap pertumbuhan bawang

merah.

Dari table anova dapat dilihat bahwa Fhitung perlakuan lebih besar dari pada
Ftabel perlakuan, sehingga H1 diterima dan H0 ditolak, berarti perlakuan kombinasi
pupuk hijau dengan limbah cair ampas sagu berpengaruh nyata terhadap pertumbuhan
bawang merah.

Di dapat KK dari data Coeff var = 21.70% (>10% (Duncan))

Berdasarkan KK yang didapat dari data yaitu 21.70% yang mana KK > 10%,
maka dilakukan uji lanjut Duncan.

Dari table hasil dapat dilihat bahwa perlakuan T4N3 yaitu dengan dosis 40 gr/
tanaman dan media tanah 150 ml adalah perlakuan yang paling berpengaruh nyata
dengan bobou umbi per plot mencapai 1003.33.

IV. KESIMPULAN

Dari penelitian terhadap bawang merah dengan perlakuan pupuk hijau yang
dikombinasikan dengan limbah cair ampas sagu tidak berpengaruh nyata terhadap
serapan unsur N, akan tetapi memberi pengaruh nyata terhadap pertumbuhan tanaman
bawang merah yaitu dengan perlakuan dosis pupuk hijau 40gr/tanaman dan jenis media
150l.