You are on page 1of 3

Global Quality APQP Requirements Matrix Latest Revision Date

Program: Actual" status symbol O item meets target (Shift + letter "o" key)
Supplier Name: key: D item does not meet target; plans exist; low risk (Shift + "d" key)
Part Number(s) C item does not meet target with high risk (Shift + "c" key)
Part Name: N/A not applicable
Supplier Champion: note: D & C these items to be included on gap analysis sheet with actions
phone/e-mail
Program Management Process (PMP) Stage
()Phase 1- date xx/yy/zz ()Phase 2- date xx/yy/zz ()Phase3 - date xx/yy/zz ()Phase 4 - date xx/yy/zz ()Phase 5 - date xx/yy/zz
APQP Elements Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
Preliminary DFMEA created for supplier DFMEA reviewed and signed for DFMEA updated to current design level DFMEA updated to current design level
responsible components or supplier has supplier responsible components or
reviewed DFMEA. High RPN’s have
supplier has reviewed , DFMEA.
action plans with timing
High RPNs have action plans with
timing that meets tool kick-off date.

1. Design FMEA
Initial design review complete with supplier 100% design concerns addressed. AIAG Design changes reviewed and 100% Design changes reviewed and 100% Design changes reviewed and 100%
and per AIAG A-2 or equivalent A-2 checklist or equivalent complete and acceptable acceptable acceptable
2. Design Review) open issues resolved
Agreement with ( ) on performance and Prototype testing and measurement is All DV testing to specifications is initiated All DV testing complete. Test results
functional validation plan; Identify key 100% complete. per plan confirm product meets all requirements
dimensional characteristics for layout on
3. Design Verification Plan prototypes

Major program elements are documented Major program elements are Major program elements are documented Major program elements are documented
to meet the program deliverables. documented to meet the program to meet the program deliverables. to meet the program deliverables.
4. Master Timing Plan deliverables.
Tool lead time/maker concept Tool maker and lead time fixed w/ Tool tryout complete and problems Tool at current design release level
gauge and fixture design concepts schedule identified tooling issues 100% resolved
Capacity study complete Gauge plan complete and approved by ( ), Gauges complete and verified Machine/fixture issues 100% resolved
Supplier manufacturing facility identified Machine/fixture plan complete and Machine/fixtures complete and problems Maintenance PM implemented
approved identified with countermeasures Set up instructions/process parameters
AIAG checklist A-5 or equivalent initiated 100%
and open issues identified. Facility 100% ready per A-5.

5. Facilities, Tool and Gauges


Control plan contains DV test plan Prototype build issues fed back into pre-
elements and prototype layout launch control plan.
6. Prototype Build Control Plan requirements
Prototype build requirements are prototype parts delivered on time at quality
documented and agreed with ( ) (quantity, level expected. Build issues have been
dates, lead time) addressed.
7. Prototype Builds
Surrogate test data submitted to ( ) DV failures were addressed in the
Engineering and QA if available DFMEA and corrective actions
incorporated into the design.
DVP&R includes requirements form
8. Design Verification Testing all pertinent specifications
preliminary list of critical characteristics layout information complete, process
identified and agreed with ( ) capability known and can meet drawing
Surrogate capability data reviewed with ( ) tolerances or actions in place to resolve
9. Prototype Part Layout and Engineering
CPK/ Ppk, APQP Elements
CAD data reviewed for feasibility issues Drawings and specifications released and 100% design change implemented 100% design change implemented 100% design change implemented
and submitted to ( ). verified against CAD data
Drawings contain appropriate material and
performance requirements
Drawings contain critical and safety
characteristics
10. Drawings and Specifications
Team Feasibility Commitment has been Signed off to current design level Signed off to current design level Signed off to current design level Signed off to current design level
11. Team Feasibility reviewed by team and signed off as
Commitment approved
Initial process flow is complete; used to Process Flow complete and AIAG A-6 Process Flow complete and AIAG A-6 or Process Flow complete and AIAG A-6
develop PFMEA and Control Plan. AIAG checklist or equivalent complete with no equivalent checklist complete with no checklist or equivalent complete with no
checklist A-6 or equivalent initiated and open issues. Launch containment is open issues open issues
12. Manufacturing Process open issues identified with actions addressed in flow.
Flow Chart
PFMEA reviewed with ( ), and signed. PFMEA complete and approved by ( ). PFMEA complete and approved by ( ). PFMEA complete and approved by ( ).
High RPNs have action plans with timing. AIAG checklist A-7 or equivalent complete AIAG checklist A-7 or equivalent complete AIAG checklist A-7 complete with no open
AIAG checklist A-7 or equivalent has been with no open issues. Packaging, labeling with no open issues. PFMEA updated issues. PFMEA updated based on early
initiated and open issues identified. and shipping are included in analysis. based on PPAP and early production runs. production runs. High RPN and high
High RPN and high severity failures have severity failures have action plans
action plans completed. completed.

13. Process FMEA


Plan for measurement of prototype parts Gauge R&R complete for prototype as Gauge R&R complete with actual Gauges and instructions updated to
exists and agreed with CVG. agreed in phase 4.1. Concerns with operators. R&R over 10% has action current design level. Gauge R&R
Requirements for Gauge R&R agreed with measurement system addressed in plans to address or ( ) approval. Gauge complete with actual operators. R&R 10%
( ). production gauge or fixture design. instructions exist. A plan exists for gauge or ( ) approval. Gauge correlation study
correlation study with ( ) incoming complete and acceptable.
14. Measurement Systems inspection.

Evaluation
Pre-launch control plan complete and Controls listed in pre-launch control plan
approved by ( ). Launch containment is have been audited and open issues
documented in plan. AIAG checklist A-8 or identified with actions and timing.
equivalent is complete with no open
issues.
15. Pre-launch Control Plan
Production ramp-up plan defined to Production schedules fixed in MRP No delivery issues during SOP
support ( ) pre-production and production systems including raw material and
requirements component releases to support ( )
requirements. Requirements for ( ) are
16. Production Ramp-up agreed with ( ).
Schedule
Prototype packaging concept approved Production packaging plan reviewed with ( Packaging design complete and reviewed Testing complete with no open issues. No labeling or packaging issues during
17. Packaging Specifications with ( ). ). with ( ). Testing plan established Packaging Declaration submitted and SOP
approved by ( ).
(PKG Declaration)
Production control plan complete and Process audit complete to control plan to
approved by ( ). Launch containment is confirm effective implementation.
documented in plan. AIAG checklist A-8 or
equivalent is complete with no open
issues.
18. Production Control Plan
Plans exist for production trial run with Trial run complete with production
trained operators and production process. process, tooling and equipment. Problems
AIAG checklist A-4 or equivalent updated. identified and corrective actions complete.
Scrap rate and cycle time objectives vs. Scrap rate and cycle time 100% to plan.
plan understood with action plans.

19. Production Trial Run


Part layout requirements agreed with ( )- Part layout complete and parts match ( )
number of pieces, dimensions, etc. Plans drawing. Dimensional results approved by
exist to complete on-time. ( ).
20. Production Part Layout
A launch readiness review has been A launch readiness review has been A launch readiness review has been A Run-at-Rate has been completed and Open issues from the Run-at-Rate have
conducted with ( ) to review status of conducted with ( ) to review status of conducted with ( ) to review status of open issues affecting SOP have adequate been resolved
program and deliverables listed above program and deliverables listed above. program and deliverables listed above. plans to meet program timing.
AIAG checklist A-4or equivalent initiated AIAG checklist A-4 or equivalent initiated
21. Launch Readiness Review and open issues identified with actions
and timing.
and open issues identified with actions
and timing.
Meeting
A plan exists for completing PpK studies in PpK studies complete and meet PPAP
support of PPAP requirements. Containment plans are in
place and documented on the control plan
for PpK < 1..67-2.0/CPK 1.67 for stable
22. Preliminary Process processes.
Capability Study
A test plan exists for PV testing including Testing per plan. Plan updated to current Testing to all material and performance
23. Production Validation specifications, tests, sample size, design level specifications is complete and product
Testing requirements, and test facility meets requirements

Boundary sample plan reviewed with ( ) Boundary samples agreed and signed off
Quality/SQ by ( ).
24. Boundary Samples
Requirement for Appearance Approval PPAP status full approval PPAP status full approval
25. Production Part Approval (AAR) is agreed with ( ). AAR is complete
(PPAP) if applicable.
Production shipping schedules established No critical delivery occurrences or
to support ( ) requirements Delivery and paperwork errors
26. Production Part Delivery at frequency method agreed with ( ).
MRD
Design has been reviewed for compliance IMDS complete. 'Received' number has IMDS complete to current design level. Warranty Issues
to ELV requirements. Concerns have been provided to ( ). 'Received' number has been provided to
27. IMDS Data Entered into been reviewed with ( ), Engineering. ( ).
System (As needed)

Supplier Qualit / Quality


Management Approval

* Overall program rating -


GREEN, YELLOW or RED

* Project Manager

* Top Management
Program Name:
Champion: Worksheet Revision Date:

Key to "Status" symbols: "O" = item meets target (Shift + letter o); "D" = item does not meet target; plans exist; low risk (Shift + d); "C" = item does not meet target with high risk (Shift + c)

Current
SR Stage APQP Element Target Actual Gap Explanation Counter Measure Responsibility Due Date Status
    1 
    2 
    3 
    4 
    5 
    6 
    7 
    8 
    9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 

You might also like