Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The traditional teaching of the Church on the sacraments has already been defined
and this truth cannot change. The only thing the church can do is define matters of
faith and doctrine that were not properly understood or made clear, she cannot
redefine that which has already been declared as truth.
The modern liberal has offered mankind a new view of sacramental theology
destroying the traditional teaching on the sacraments. Yes man has progressed into
the modern world, however, since the truth cannot change the fixed Rites, handed
down trough the ages, cannot change. Regardless of what one may think to be true,
the fact of the matter remains, there were changes instituted in the sacraments in
the wake of Vatican II.
St. Augustine tells us: “It is Divine Wisdom incarnate that established the
sacraments as a means of salvation,” St. Thomas Aquinas states that, “As the Grace
of the sacraments comes from God alone, it is to Him alone that the institution of
the sacrament belongs.”
The Apostles were not the authors of the sacraments, they were dispensers of the
mysteries of Christ. “Let a man so account of us as of the ministers of Christ, and
the dispensers of the mysteries of God. “ (1 Cor. 4:1)
If anyone shall say that the sacraments of the New Law were not all instituted by
Jesus Christ our Lord, or that there are more or less than seven, namely Baptism,
Confirmation, Eucharist, Penance, Extreme Unction, Orders, and Matrimony, or even
that any one of these seven is not truly and strictly speaking a sacrament: let him
be anathema (Canon of the Council of Trent, Denzinger, 844).
If anyone say that the sacraments of the New Law do not contain the Grace which
they signify, or that they do not confer Grace on those who place no obstacle to
the same, let him be anathema (Canon of the Council of Trent).
There are proper elements necessary for a sacrament to be valid. The Church teaches
as follows:
There must be a proper minister (where the minister is a priest), the priest must
be validly ordained.
He must use proper “form” and “matter”; the recipient must be capable of receiving
the sacrament. If any one of these is faulty or absent, the sacrament is not
effective. Each of these requirements will be considered sequentially.
Intention: The Minister must have the proper intention. That is, he must intend to
do what the Church intends, or what Christ intends (which is in fact the same
thing). Intention is usually seen as having both an external and internal aspect.
The external intention is provided to the minister by the rite he uses and it is
assumed that he intends what the rite intends. His internal intention is another
matter and can never be known with certainty unless he exposes it or makes it
known. The minister can, by withholding his internal intention, or having an
internal intention that contradicts that of the rite, obviate or prevent the effect
of a sacrament. The Church, recognizing that it can never know the internal
intention of the minister, assumes it is the same as his external intention (the
intention which the traditional rite provides by its very wording), unless he
himself informs the Church otherwise.
Proper Form and Matter: Christ determined what special Graces were to be conferred
by means of external rites: for some sacraments (e.g., Baptism, the Eucharist) He
determined minutely (in specie) the matter and form: for others He determined only
in a general way (in genere) that there should be an external ceremony, by which
special Graces were to be conferred, leaving to the Apostles or to the Church the
power to determine whatever He had not determined—for example, to prescribe the
matter and form of the sacraments of Confirmation and of Holy Orders.
The Church is forbidden to change, or even touch, the matter or form of any
sacrament. She may indeed change or abolish or introduce something in the non-
essential rites or “ceremonial” parts to be used in the administration of the
sacraments, such as the processions, prayers, or hymns, before or after the actual
words of the form are recited. It is clear, if any substantial part of the
sacramental form is suppressed, that the essential sense of the words is destroyed,
and consequently the sacrament is invalid (Summa, III, Q. 60, Art. 8).
Sacramental terminology can be confusing. “The substance of the form” refers to the
words that convey its meaning. “The essential words of the form” are those words on
which the substance depends. Theologians might argue about what the essential words
are, but all agree on the need to maintain the integrity (i.e., the completeness)
of the received forms.19 Again, a form may contain the “essential words” but be
invalidated by the addition of other words that change its meaning. As the Missale
Romanum states: “If words are added which do not alter the meaning, then the
sacrament is valid, but the celebrant commits a mortal sin in making such an
addition” (De Defectibus).
*The Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, and Eastern Catholic Churches permit
married men to be ordained. Traditionally however, they do not permit, clerical
marriage, clergy to marry after ordination. Clerical marriage is the practice of
allowing clergy (those who have already been ordained) to marry. It is a practice
distinct from allowing married persons to become clergy. Clerical marriage is
admitted in Protestantism, Anglicanism, Lutheranism, and some Independent Catholic
Churches.
◦