Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Emailing C Labour Laws I - Probles
Emailing C Labour Laws I - Probles
Hyperlinked index
Unit-I
Registration
Fund
Contribution
Strike
Unit-II & III
Jurisdiction
Workman
Strike
Layoff
Retrenchment
Closure
Standing Order
Unit-IV
Factories Act
Page 1 of 9
Sl Problems Year
Unit-I
Registration
Fund
2 A Trade Union member who was poor but very popular and who Jun-2012
has not contributed to political fund requests the help from
general fund for his election. Trade Union refuses to help from
general fund for his election. Decide
Contribution
Strike
Page 2 of 9
Unit-II/III
Jurisdiction
1 Jurisdictio Workers and management of Ravi Enterprises could not arrive at Jun-2014
n a settlement regarding their bonus issue for the year 2012-13.
They prefer to go to Labour Court in order to solve their differences
of opinion. Are they justified in their dispute2? Decide
Workman
Workman
Strike
13 Akshata and Co. is a public utility service industry where a strike Jun-2012
commenced during the pendency of conciliation proceedings and
the workmen plead that the strike was provoked by employer. Jnu-2018
Decide
Layoff
14 Layoff Mohan and Co. Ltd directed its workmen not to report for work Dec-2019
Compensa for 15 days due to water scarcity in the industry. The workmen
tion claimed lay off compensation. Mohan and Co. Ltd. refused to pay.
Decide.
Retrenchment
Page 4 of 9
15 Retrenchm Anand, a driver with Rajasthan State Transport Corporation was Mar-2021
ent terminated on account of his eyesight problem. Is he entitled to
Compensa claim retrenchment compensation?
tion
Closure
18 Standing The certifying officer certified and sent to the employer the Dec-2019
Order standing orders for his industry without sending a copy to the
concerned Trade Union. The Trade Union challenges the standing
orders as invalid because they were not consulted. Decide
Standing Order
Fasting
In Rathan Steel Industrial Unit all the 15 employees for the Jun-2014
purpose of pressing their demands for additional allowance do not
take the free food served in the canteen and decided to fast unto
death without abstaining from work. Is their act unlawful? Decide
Page 5 of 9
Unit-IV
Accident/Employment Injury
Clarification needed
A workman residing in the hut provided by the worker. The hut Dec-2012
caught fire on the night and workman sustained sever burn
injuries consequent upon which his earning capacity was
reduced. Can he claim compensation from his employer. Give
reason.
2 The workman died due to natural lightning while working at the Jun-2013
site – Is the employer liable to pay compensation? Decide giving
reason
4 A boy is employed by the factory in a tea shop and it was part of Jun-2014
Dec-2019
his duty to take tea from the shop which was situated outside the
factory gate to various persons working in the factory. One day
when the boy was coming out of the factory after serving tea to
the workers, he passed through a violent mob of factory workers
who were leaving the factory. This mob attacked the police and
the police had to fire upon the mob in self-defence unfortunately,
the boy was severely wounded by a bullet and died on the
following day in the hospital. Now the mother of the boy claims
compensation. Decide giving reason
5 A was the employee in the Lorry of B. His duties were to X and the Jun-2018
materials on the Lorry and to go with same for unloading the
materials at the work spot. While the Lorry was moving, he
attempted to hit rabbit passing on the read3 and, in the attempt,
he fell down from the lorry and died. His wife wants to claim
compensation. Advise her
Workman
ESI
6 ESI Raja was working as an electrician in David and Co. Ltd. David Dec-2019
and Co. Ltd. is a Subscriber to the ESI Corporation. Raja comes
into contract with a live wire and dies. His widow Rani claims
compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923.
David and Co. refuses to pay. What is the remedy available to
Rani?
Page 7 of 9
8 “A” a workman died due to an accident while performing the duty Jun-2012
Jun-2015
of an employer. Subsequently it had been proved that at the time
Jun-2016
of the accident the workman was under the influence of Dec-2017
Jun-2019
intoxication. Whether employer is liable to pay compensation
Dec-2020
Unit-V
Factories Act
3 Niteesh and Company Ltd are manufacturing salt from sea water Dec-2019
on the coast of Ratnagiri in Maharashtra. They have employed 30
workers to collect the salt, pack it and load it onto trucks. The
Inspector of Factories prosecutes the Director for not maintaining
a register of workers as required under the Factories Act, 1948.
Niteesh and Co. contend that they are not a factory as defined in
the Factories Act, 1948. Decide
Page 8 of 9
Disclaimer: -
This compilation has been prepared with the purpose of enabling students to get idea about questions
asked in the past. Due care has been taken to avoid errors or omission, but in spite of best efforts and
caution, errors, omissions may have crept in. Students are requested to bring to the notice of
While maximum care is taken in compiling questions in the interest of students, college does not accept any
responsibility for any omission, deletion, error whatsoever. Students are advised to refer previous years question
papers and ensure correctness of information contained in this document.
Note-In some years, questions from more than one batch are included.
Eg -2021 - questions from 3 batches papers are included. Similarly, 2019 there were 2 batches papers in June and
December exam
Page 9 of 9