Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/304067308
CITATIONS READS
60 2,945
1 author:
Stuart Granshaw
None
64 PUBLICATIONS 513 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Stuart Granshaw on 23 January 2018.
Abstract
This contribution offers a considerably expanded and updated version of
“Photogrammetric Terminology: Second Edition” (2012), which was adopted as
an official document of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote
Sensing (ISPRS). The aim is to assist authors and editors in preparing
contributions for publication and readers in the wider geomatics community in
understanding current photogrammetric terms and abbreviations.
the value of these two guides when editing authors’ papers. It also became clear that the
geomatics community would benefit from greater standardisation of terminology. For
example, not only are lidar, LiDAR and LIDAR commonly used, but even unfortunate
terms such as t-LIDAR (terrestrial lidar) are now being published.
Which terms to include in a guide such as this is a thorny issue and exact content
varies with personal opinion. The listing contains very many new terms compared with the
2012 edition and other entries have been deleted. Thus, alternative forms for European cities
(such as Hanover/Hannover), all educational institutions (for example, ITC) and purely
British institutions (one instance is the Chartered Institution of Civil Engineering Surveyors)
have been removed. It is hoped that there is greater consistency and a more international
perspective due to such changes, but this also means that the Newby (2012) second edition
will remain useful for certain readers and can be consulted profitably in conjunction with
this new contribution.
Comments
The second column of the listing is headed “Comment, context . . .” As already
indicated, these are not definitions although, unlike the second edition, the vast majority of
entries have some explanation. Many areas are subjective and depend on the particular
context; limited space also means that comments are necessarily short and, hopefully,
succinct. Furthermore, seemingly innocuous near-synonyms such as altitude, elevation and
height can cause great friction amongst different professionals (see Granshaw, 2016). I have
also had interesting exchanges with The Photogrammetric Record’s French and German
abstract translators on related terms such as DEM, DHM and DTM where the English-
language preference for “elevation” in DEM is not reciprocated by our European
colleagues.
Hyphens
English does not lend itself well to compound nouns, at least with three or more
components. The German Zuordnungswahrscheinlichkeiten may be easily understood but
try closerangeleastsquaresmashup: is this the intended close-range least-squares mash-up
(all three terms in the listing) or the perverse closer angel east square smash-up? Two
entities can often be combined into a single word, such as spaceborne in the listing.
When this is not acceptable (Laserscanning may be used in German but a can of lasers is
yet to be marketed) a hyphen can be used, as in satellite-borne. This is a common cause
of difficulty, and not only to second-language users of English. An example is stereo,
with a variety of compound nouns (stereomodel, stereopair), separate words (stereo
overlap, stereo photograph) and hyphenated words (stereo-image, tri-stereoscopic).
Similarly, the separate entries for multimedia photogrammetry and multi-media
photogrammetry relate to two entirely different concepts. To this apparent confusion one
must add the democracy that the English language demonstrates in readily accepting
changes over time based on common usage. Thus, dataset of the second edition of this
guide was data-set in the first edition; both multiview and multi-view are currently used in
the literature and we have preprocessing yet post-processing. Add to this already turbulent
mix the (British) English disdain for multiple hyphens (high-resolution imagery yet very
high resolution imagery), a distinction which would be less troubling to our American
colleagues.
As well as the use of hyphens in nouns, adjectival hyphens are also important. In the
second edition Newby (2012) offered the example: “digitally derived data can result from
user-friendly real-time processing” (no hyphen required after adverbs such as digitally).
Another example is close range image measurement: close-range image measurement and
close range-image measurement are two very different things. This is further complicated
by frequent exceptions; thus, close range photogrammetry, like medium scale mapping,
traditionally – but inexplicably – uses no hyphens (but note close-range applications). The
listing uses the abbreviation -adj, meaning “hyphen when adjectival” to assist users in this
regard.
Other Changes
One simple change in this edition is to use bold text for all cross-references to primary
terms that are listed themselves. I have also increased the number of mathematical or
statistical terms, such as “matrix” or “CE90″, although it is recognised that this is not the
place for elaborate explanations. My final major change is to include, for selected entries,
references to actual usage of terms in The Photogrammetric Record (for example, the
Newby (2012) paper would appear as PR 27(139):360). In a few cases, important and
seminal references from other sources have also been included, such as Brown’s 1966 paper
on decentring distortion in Photogrammetric Engineering which is still widely quoted half a
century later.
Conclusions
Including new terms in this guide is a natural development from the second edition.
Many papers now refer to structure-from-motion software such as Bundler, or the Chinese
satellite ZY-3, that were not pertinent or current in the 2012 edition. However, many of the
entries are mere modifications to those in the second edition and are therefore attributable to
Paul Newby, as is the basic format. I hope the inclusions of further terms and more
extensive comments is helpful but that I have not made the guide too “encyclopaedic”
(despite its burgeoning size). I emphasise, once again, that comments are designed purely to
be indicative: they are not definitions.
Acknowledgements
I am very grateful to Simon Buckley, Clive Fraser, Derek Lichti, Paul Newby and
Stewart Walker for carefully looking at various drafts of this paper and making constructive
criticisms, including additional entries and certain deletions. The listing essentially follows
the format perfected in the two previous editions; thus, I am standing on the broad
shoulders of Paul Newby and Veronica Brown (who embraced the original concept of a
terminology guide). By extension, I wish to thank others who have also contributed either
to this new listing or the two previous editions: Jim Chandler, Ian Dowman, Armin Gruen,
Pierre Grussenmeyer, Eberhard G€ ulch, Hans-Gerd Maas, Tim McVicar, Laurent Polidori,
Grant Thomson and Dominik Vock.
references
Fisher, R. B., Breckon, T. P., Dawson-Howe, K., Fitzgibbon, A., Robertson, C., Trucco, E. and
Williams, C. K. I., 2014. Dictionary of Computer Vision and Image Processing. Second edition. Wiley,
Chichester, UK. 372 pages.
Granshaw, S. I., 2016. Editorial: Terminology dichotomies. Photogrammetric Record, 31(154): 116–120.
Newby, P. R. T., 2007. Technical terminology for the photogrammetric community. Photogrammetric Record,
22(118): 164–179.
Newby, P. R. T., 2012. Photogrammetric terminology: second edition. Photogrammetric Record, 27(139): 360–386.
listing references
Abdel-Aziz, Y. I. and Karara, H. M., 1971. Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into
object-space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry. American Society of Photogrammetry, Symposium
on Close-Range Photogrammetry, Falls Church, Virginia, USA. 433 pages: 1–18.
Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T. and van Gool, L., 2008. Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Computer
Vision and Image Understanding, 110(3): 346–359.
Besl, P. J. and McKay, H. D., 1992. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern
Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(2): 239–256.
Brown, D. C., 1966. Decentring distortion of lenses. Photogrammetric Engineering, 32(3): 444–462.
Brown, D. C., 1971. Close-range camera calibration. Photogrammetric Engineering, 37(8): 855–866.
Canny, J., 1986. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and
Machine Intelligence, 8(6): 679–698.
Fischler, M. A. and Bolles, R. C., 1981. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with
applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24(6): 381–395.
€rstner, W. and G€
Fo ulch, E., 1987. A fast operator for detection and precise location of distinct points,
corners and centres of circular features. Proceedings of ISPRS Intercommission Conference on Fast
Processing of Photogrammetric Data, Interlaken, Switzerland. 437 pages: 281–305.
Furukawa, Y. and Ponce, J., 2010. Accurate, dense, and robust multiview stereopsis. IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(8): 1362–1376.
Harris, C. and Stephens, M., 1988. A combined corner and edge detector. Proceedings of the 4th Alvey
Vision Conference, University of Manchester, UK. 302 pages: 147–151. http://www.bmva.org/bmvc/1988/
avc-88-023.pdf
Hirschm€ uller, H., 2005. Accurate and efficient stereo processing by semi-global matching and mutual
information. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2: 807–814.
Hough, P. V. C., 1962. Method and means for recognizing complex patterns. US Patent 3 069 654.
JCGM, 2008. Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Joint
Committee for Guides in Metrology (WG 1). 120 pages. www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/
JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf
Lowe, D., 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. Proceedings of the International
Conference on Computer Vision, 2: 1150–1157.
McGlone, J. C. (Ed.), 2013. Manual of Photogrammetry. Sixth edition. American Society for Photogrammetry
and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 1318 pages.
Resume
Cette contribution offre une edition considerablement etendue et actualisee de la deuxieme edition du
lexique photogrammetrique (“Photogrammetric Terminology: Second Edition”, 2012), adoptee comme
document officiel par la Societe internationale de photogrammetrie et de teledetection (ISPRS). L’objectif est
d’apporter une aide aux auteurs et aux editeurs dans la preparation de leurs publications, et aux lecteurs d’une
large communaute geomatique pour la comprehension des termes et abreviations couramment utilises en
photogrammetrie.
Zusammenfassung
Dieser Beitrag umfasst eine deutlich erweiterte und aktualisierte Version von “Photogrammetric
Terminology: Second Edition” (2012), das als offizielles Dokument der Internationalen Gesellschaft f€ur
Photogrammetrie und Fernerkundung (ISPRS) verabschiedet wurde. Das Ziel ist es Autoren und Schriftleiter bei
der Vorbereitung von Publikationen und Leser aus dem weiten Umfeld der Geomatik beim Verstehen aktueller
photogrammetrischer Ausdr€ucke und Abk€urzungen zu unterst€utzen.
Resumen
Esta contribucion ofrece una edicion actualizada y extendida de “Terminologıa Fotogrametrica: Segunda
on” (2012), que ha sido adoptado como documento oficial de la Sociedad Internacional de Fotogrametrıa
Edici
y Teledetecci
on (ISPRS). El objetivo es asistir a los autores y editores en la preparacion de contribuciones en
publicaciones y asistir a los lectores de la amplia comunidad geomatica en la comprension de los terminos y
abreviaturas.
摘要
摄影测量术语(第三版)作为国际摄影测量与遥感学会(ISPRS)的官方文件,对摄影测量术语(第二版
2012)进行了非常大的扩展和更新。其目的是帮助作者和编辑在地球空间信息领域更好的理解和使用快速
发展的的摄影测量术语和缩写。