Data from a Sample of Soap Purchase

Safeguard Safeguard Safeguard

Palmolive Ivory Palmolive
Dove Irish Spring Silka
Olay Irish Spring Safeguard
Ivory Ivory Palmolive
Irish Spring Ivory Palmolive
Silka Safeguard Ivory
Bioderm Ivory Safeguard
Bioderm Dove Silka
Dove Dove Silka

Sample Age
22 25
21 27
19 22
25 30
22 27
29 30
21 25
20 26
50 22
20 21

BINS WIDTH FREQUENCY

22 4
21 4
19 1
25 5
29 2
20 2
50 1
TOTAL 186 19

GROUP MEMBERS
AYCARDO, VIA L.
ESPEDIDO, MARISOL
LORETO, JERLYN T.
RICAPORT, JOAN L.
ap Purchase
Irish Spring Irish Spring
Silka Dove
Silka Dove
Silka Dove
Safeguard Ivory
Dove Irish Spring
Safeguard Safeguard
Silka Safeguard
Bioderm Bioderm
Bioderm Bioderm

Sample Age of Students in Lopez

28 31 34
33 39 45
25 28 31
35 40 45
32 37 42
31 32 33
29 33 37
32 38 45
21 23 25
24 24 27

RELATIVE FREQUENCY PERCENT FREQUENCY MEAN

0.210526315789474 21.05% 29.66
0.210526315789474 21.05% MEDIAN
0.0526315789473684 5.26% 28.5
0.263157894736842 26.32% MODE
0.105263157894737 10.53% 25
0.105263157894737 10.53%
0.0526315789473684 5.26%
1 100.00%
Data from a Sample of Soap Purchase BINS FREQUENCY
Safeguard Safeguard 10
Palmolive Palmolive 4
Dove Dove 8
Olay Olay 1
Ivory Ivory 7
Irish Spring Irish Spring 6
Silka Silka 8
Bioderm Bioderm 6
TOTAL: 50
RELATIVE FREQUENCY PERCENT FREQUENCY
0.2 20.00%
0.08 8.00%
0.16 16.00%
0.02 2.00%
0.14 14.00%
0.12 12.00%
0.16 16.00%
0.12 12.00%
1 100.00%
Salesperson Total Sales ($) Average Performance Bonus Previ
Smith, Michael 325,000.78 12,499.35
Yu, Joe 13,678.21 239.9434
Reeves, Bill 452,359.19 21,987.25
Hamilton, Joshua 87,423.91 7,642.90
Harper, Derek 87,654.21 1,250.14
Quinn, Dorothy 234,091.39 14,567.98
Graves, Lorrie 379,401.94 27,981.44
Sun, Yi 31,733.59 672.91
Thompson, Nicole 12,845.22 13,322.97

Gross Domestic Product

Country Year 1 Year 2
Albania 7,385,937,423 8,105,580,293
Argentina 169,725,491,092 198,012,474,920
Australia 704,453,444,387 758,320,889,024
Austria 272,865,358,404 290,682,488,352
Belgium 335,571,307,765 355,372,712,266

Question #1
How could you improve the readability of both table? Create another table using the given data on the same
worksheet.
Answer: We could improve the readability of both table by making charts, it accurately shows the visual
statement to the given data. It also explains the information regarding on the data that had been gathered.

Question #2

The file GDPYears contains sample data from the United Nations Statistics Division on
30 countries and their GDP values from Year 1 to Year 6 in US $. Create at table that
provides all these data for a user. Format the table to make it easy to read as possible.

Month Jan Feb

Revenue ($) 145,869 123,576

Revenue ($)
250,000

200,000

150,000
 Revenue ($)
250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
 Customer Accounts Years with Company
124 14
9 7
175 21
28 3
21 4
48 9
121 12
7 1
17 3

Gross Domestic Product

Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6
9,650,128,750 11,592,303,225 10,781,921,975 10,569,204,154
241,037,555,661 301,259,040,110 285,070,994,754 339,604,450,702
916,931,817,944 982,991,358,955 934,168,969,952 1,178,776,680,167
336,840,690,493 375,777,347,214 344,514,388,622 341,440,991,770
408,482,592,257 451,663,134,614 421,433,351,959 416,534,140,346

sing the given data on the same

accurately shows the visual

data that had been gathered.

cs Division on
at table that
ad as possible.

Mar Apr May Jun

143,298 178,505 186,850 192,850

What are the problems with the layout and display of this line chart?
Answer: The problem with the layout and display of this line chart is not clearly visible to
the eyes of the readers.
 What are the problems with the layout and display of this line chart?
Answer: The problem with the layout and display of this line chart is not clearly visible to
the eyes of the readers.

Sep Oct Nov Dec

 This chart isn't available in your version of Excel.

Editing this shape or saving this workbook into a different file format will permanently break the
chart.

Gross Domestic Product Values

2,500,000,000,000

2,000,000,000,000

1,500,000,000,000

1,000,000,000,000

500,000,000,000

0
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6

Albania Argentina Australia Austria Belgium

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

134,500 145,286 154,285 148,523 139,600 148,235

early visible to
early visible to
 Activity #1:
Observation
20 Observation
60

40

20

-20

-40

-60

Observation X Y

Activity #2- The trendline confirms that there appears to be a positive linear relationship between the x and y variables.

Activity #3:
Manufacturer Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Toyota 8.04 8.53 9.24 7.23 8.56
GM 8.97 9.35 8.28 6.46 8.48
Volkswagen 5.68 6.27 6.44 6.07 7.34
Hyundai 2.51 2.62 2.78 4.65 5.76

Product Millions of Vehicles

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Toyota GM Volkswagen Hyundai

 4
3
2
1
0
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Toyota GM Volkswagen Hyundai

Activity # 4- The International Organization of Motor Vehicle

Manufacturers (officially known as the Organization
International des Constructeurs Automobiles, OICA) provides
data on worldwide vehicle production by manufacturer. The
following table shows vehicle production numbers for four
different manufacturers for five recent years. Data are in
millions of vehicles.

Activity # 5- Over the last five years of data collection for the
Motor Vehicle ranking of the leading tyre manufacturers, a
few trends can be observed see accompanying graphs for
more details. Firstly, it is easy to see that there are a few
separate groupings of rival companies within the top ten. In
our first chart, we can see that GM Company has continued
to progress in narrowing the Motor Vehicle sales gap with
Goodyear, partially because Goodyear has yet to regain the
level of sales achieved in every year despite improved results
on its half-decade low in year 4. Regardless of their order, it
has been appropriate to talk of a global Big Four motor
vehicle manufacturers for a few years.
 Observation X Y
1 -22 22
2 -33 49
3 2 8
4 29 -16
5 -13 10
6 21 -28
7 -13 27
8 -23 35
9 -14 -5
10 3 -3
11 -37 48
12 34 -29
13 9 -18
14 -33 31
15 20 -16
16 -3 14
17 -15 18
18 12 17
19 -20 -11
20 -7 -22

between the x and y variables.

 Forecast error
Week Value (Y) Forecast (Y) e=Y-Y Absolute Value of Forecast error [e]

1 18
2 13 18 -5 5
3 16 13 3 3
4 11 16 -5 5
5 17 11 6 6
6 14 17 -3 3
TOTAL: -4 22
Activity 1: The type of pattern used is horizontal pattern
because it shows graphical presentation of the Mean Forecast Error (MFCE) =
relationship between time and the time series variables; Mean Absolute Error (MAF) =
time is represented on the horizontal axis and values of
the times series variable are shown on the verticall axis Mean Squared Error (MSE) =
Mean Absolute percentage error (MAF) =
Week 7 Forecast

Time Series Forecast error

Month Value (Y) Forecast (Y) e=Y-Y Absolute Value of Forecast error [e]

1 105
2 135 105 30 30
3 120 135 -15 15
4 105 120 -15 15
5 90 105 -15 15
6 120 90 30 30
7 145 120 25 25
8 140 145 -5 5
9 100 140 -40 40
10 80 100 -20 20
11 100 80 20 20
12 110 100 10 10
TOTAL: 5 225

The pattern exist in the data is trend pattern because it Mean Forecast Error (MFCE) =
shows gradual shifts to relatively higher or lower Mean Absolute error (MAE)=
values over a longer period of time. Mean Squared error (MSE) =
Mean absolute percentage error (MA
12 MONTHS Forecast=

ACTIVITY #3
Quarter Stocks (%)
Year 1, Quarter 1 29.8
Year 1, Quarter 2 31
Year 1, Quarter 3 29.9
Year 1, Quarter 4 30.1
 Year 2, Quarter 1 32.2
Year 2, Quarter 2 31.5
Year 2, Quarter 3 32
Year 2, Quarter 4 31.9

Breakout patterns can occur when a stock has been trading

and the bottom is support. If the stock breaks through eith
breaks above resistance, we call it a breakout. Below supp
trading here

Year Cost/Unit
1 20
2 24.5
3 28.2
4 27.5 160
5 26.6 140
6 30 120
7 31
100
8 36
80

Positive trend pattern (b) Use simple linear regression analysis to find the parameters for 60
the line that minimizes MSE for this time series. 40
20
0
1
 Absolute
Value of
Squared Percentage
Forecast error Percentage error
Error
Measuring The Forecast Ac
25 -38.46% 38.46% Naïve Method
9 18.75% 18.75%
20
25 -45.45% 45.45%
18
36 35.29% 35.29% 16
9 -21.43% 21.43% 14
104 -51.30% 159.39% 12
10
8
-166.67%
6
266.67% 4
1633.33% 2
-108.55% 0
1 2 3 4
-73.44%
Week Value (Y)

Squared Absolute
Forecast error Percentage error Value of
Percentage Sales Forecast
Error
160
900 22.22% 22.22% 145
140 135 140
225 -12.50% 12.50% 120 120 120
225 -14.29% 14.29% 105 105
100 1
225 -16.67% 16.67% 90
900 25.00% 25.00% 80
625 17.24% 17.24% 60
25 -3.57% 3.57% 40
1600 -40.00% 40.00%
20
400 -25.00% 25.00% 6 7 8
1 2 3 4 5
400 20.00% 20.00% 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
100 9.09% 9.09%
5625 -18.47% 205.58% Month Time Series Value (

Forecast Error (MFCE) = 0.4545454545

Absolute error (MAE)= 20.454545455
Squared error (MSE) = 511.36363636
ute percentage error (MAPE)= 0.186889382
MONTHS Forecast= 110

PORTFOLIO COMPOSITIO
Column B Column C Column D Column E
104

25 25 36
9 9 22
5 3 5 6 3
6
18 13 3 16 11 17
18 13 16 11 17 14
-5 -5 -3 -4
1 2 3 4 5 6
 Column B Column C Column D Column E
104

25 25 36
9 9 22
5 3 5 6 3
6
18 13 3 16 11 17
18 13 16 11 17 14
-5 -5 -3 -4
1 2 3 4 5 6

n a stock has been trading in a range. The top of the range is resistance,
tock breaks through either end of this range, it’s a breakout. When it
a breakout. Below support is a breakdown. Learn more about breakout

MANUFACTURING COST
4 105
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
 The Forecast Accuracy
Naïve Method

3 4 5 6

Week Value (Y)

Sales Forecast

145
140
120
110
100 100
90
80

8 9 10 11 12
5 6 7
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Month Time Series Value (Y)

OLIO COMPOSITION
mn C Column D Column E Column F
104

25 36 F
9 9 22 n
m
5 6 3 lu
6 6 17 Co
11 B
17 14 n
m
lu
-5 -3 -4 Co
5 6
mn C Column D Column E Column F
104

25 36 F
9 9 22 n
m
5 6 3 lu
6 6 17 Co
11 B
17 14 n
m
lu
-5 -3 -4 Co
5 6
 X Y Xi X Xi-X Yi
4 50 4 8 -4 50
6 50 6 8 -2 50
11 40 11 8 3 40
3 60 3 8 -5 60
16 30 16 8 8 30
46 8 5

-48

STDEV 5.431390246 11.40175425099 61.9273768215641

COVARIANCE -48
CORRELATION -0.77510146

Jobless Rate and Percent of Delinquent Loans. The economic downturn in 2008– 2009 resulted in the loss of jobs and an
housing. In projecting where the real estate market was headed in the coming year, economists studied the relationship
percentage of delinquent loans. The expectation was that if the jobless rate continued to increase, there would also be
delinquent loans. The following data show the jobless rate and the delinquent loan percentage for 27 majo

Metro Area Jobless Rate Delinquent Loans Metro Area

Atlanta 7.1 7.02 New York
Boston 5.2 5.31 Orange
Charlotte 7.8 5.38 Orlando
Chicago 7.8 5.4 Philadephia
Dallas 5.8 5 Phoenix
Denver 5.8 4.07 Portland
Detroit 9.3 6.53 Raleigh
Houston 5.7 5.57 Sacramento
Jacksonville 7.3 6.99 St. Louis
Las Vegas 7.6 11.12 San Diego
Los Angeles 8.2 7.56 San Francisco
Miami 7.1 12.11 Seattle
Minneapolis 6.3 4.39 Tampa
Nashville 6.6 4.78

Metro Area Jobless Rate Delinquent Loans X Y

Atlanta 7.1 7.02 7.1 7.02
Boston 5.2 5.31 5.2 5.31
Charlotte 7.8 5.38 7.8 5.38
Chicago 7.8 5.4 7.8 5.4
Dallas 5.8 5 5.8 5
Denver 5.8 4.07 5.8 4.07
Detroit 9.3 6.53 9.3 6.53
Houston 5.7 5.57 5.7 5.57
Jacksonville 7.3 6.99 7.3 6.99
Las Vegas 7.6 11.12 7.6 11.12
Los Angeles 8.2 7.56 8.2 7.56
Miami 7.1 12.11 7.1 12.11
Minneapolis 6.3 4.39 6.3 4.39
Nashville 6.6 4.78 6.6 4.78
New York 6.2 5.78 6.2 5.78
Orange 6.3 6.08 6.3 6.08
Orlando 7 10.05 7 10.05
Philadephia 6.2 4.75 6.2 4.75
Phoenix 5.5 7.22 5.5 7.22
Portland 6.5 3.79 6.5 3.79
Raleigh 5 3.62 5 3.62
Sacramento 8.3 9.24 8.3 9.24
St. Louis 7.5 4.4 7.5 4.4
San Diego 7.1 6.91 7.1 6.91
San Francisco 6.8 5.57 6.8 5.57
Seattle 5.5 3.87 5.5 3.87
Tampa 7.5 8.42 7.5 8.42
6.777777777778 6.33074074074074 6.777778 6.3307407407

STDEV 1.04452172836454 2.236579 2.336155

COVARIANCE 1.04675720731901
CORRELATION 0.44806839009819
 Y Yi-Y (X)(Y) 70
46 4 -16
46 4 -8 60
46 -6 -18
46 14 -70 50
46 -16 -128
-240 40

30

20

10

0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

ulted in the loss of jobs and an increase in delinquent loans for

omists studied the relationship between the jobless rate and the
increase, there would also be an increase in the percentage of
nt loan percentage for 27 major real estate markets

Jobless Rate Delinquent Loans

25
6.2 5.78
6.3 6.08
7 10.05 20
6.2 4.75
5.5 7.22
15
6.5 3.79
5 3.62
8.3 9.24 10
7.5 4.4
7.1 6.91 5
6.8 5.57
5.5 3.87
0
7.5 8.42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Column C Column D

Xi X Xi-X Yi Y Yi-Y (X)(Y)

7.1 6.777778 0.322222 7.02 6.330741 0.689259 0.222095
5.2 6.777778 -1.577778 5.31 6.330741 -1.020741 1.610502
7.8 6.777778 1.022222 5.38 6.330741 -0.950741 -0.971868
7.8 6.777778 1.022222 5.4 6.330741 -0.930741 -0.951424
5.8 6.777778 -0.977778 5 6.330741 -1.330741 1.301169
5.8 6.777778 -0.977778 4.07 6.330741 -2.260741 2.210503
9.3 6.777778 2.522222 6.53 6.330741 0.199259 0.502576
5.7 6.777778 -1.077778 5.57 6.330741 -0.760741 0.81991
7.3 6.777778 0.522222 6.99 6.330741 0.659259 0.34428
7.6 6.777778 0.822222 11.12 6.330741 4.789259 3.937834
8.2 6.777778 1.422222 7.56 6.330741 1.229259 1.74828
7.1 6.777778 0.322222 12.11 6.330741 5.779259 1.862204
6.3 6.777778 -0.477778 4.39 6.330741 -1.940741 0.927243
6.6 6.777778 -0.177778 4.78 6.330741 -1.550741 0.275688
6.2 6.777778 -0.577778 5.78 6.330741 -0.550741 0.318206
6.3 6.777778 -0.477778 6.08 6.330741 -0.250741 0.119798
7 6.777778 0.222222 10.05 6.330741 3.719259 0.826501
6.2 6.777778 -0.577778 4.75 6.330741 -1.580741 0.913317
5.5 6.777778 -1.277778 7.22 6.330741 0.889259 -1.136276
6.5 6.777778 -0.277778 3.79 6.330741 -2.540741 0.705762
5 6.777778 -1.777778 3.62 6.330741 -2.710741 4.819095
8.3 6.777778 1.522222 9.24 6.330741 2.909259 4.428538
7.5 6.777778 0.722222 4.4 6.330741 -1.930741 -1.394423
7.1 6.777778 0.322222 6.91 6.330741 0.579259 0.18665
6.8 6.777778 0.022222 5.57 6.330741 -0.760741 -0.016905
5.5 6.777778 -1.277778 3.87 6.330741 -2.460741 3.14428
7.5 6.777778 0.722222 8.42 6.330741 2.089259 1.508909
27 28.26244

1.046757
12 14 16 18

9 10 11 12 13 14

lumn D