Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10.1190/1.2978337
Downloaded 01/21/15 to 128.120.194.195. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
Manuscript received by the Editor 16 November 2007; revised manuscript received 25 January 2008; published online 24 October 2008.
1
ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, Houston, Texas, U.S.A. E-mail: ganglin.chen@exxonmobil.com.
2
ExxonMobil International Limited, London, U.K. E-mail: gianni.matteucci@exxonmobil.com.
3
ExxonMobil Exploration Company, Houston, Texas, U.S.A. E-mail: bill.a.fahmy@exxonmobil.com.
4
ExxonMobil Production Company, Houston, Texas, U.S.A. E-mail: chris.finn@exxonmobil.com.
© 2008 Society of Exploration Geophysicists. All rights reserved.
C23
C24 Chen et al.
a)
b)
b)
c)
erage of some typical deepwater WestAfrica reservoirs used in a pre- Model parameters were adjusted based on comparisons of spectral-
vious seismic/well-tie study 共Gratwick and Finn, 2004; Gratwick decomposition attributes from the synthetic seismograms and field
and Finn, 2005兲. Figure 3a shows acoustic impedance models of seismic images. Thousands of models were generated in each simu-
studied reservoirs. Near-angle 共Figure 3b兲 and far-angle synthetic lation while adjusting the model parameters. Figure 4 shows the dis-
seismograms were generated with a plane-wave convolution ap- tribution of three key parameters from the final models:
Downloaded 01/21/15 to 128.120.194.195. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
a)
b)
acoustic impedance for the shale above and below the reservoir兲.
共3兲
Notice, in this case, how peak frequencies decrease monotonically
with increasing gross reservoir thickness as a consequence of the in-
where creasing time duration for the acoustic wave to propagate through
the reservoir sand 共Figure 5b兲. The small separation in peak frequen-
Total shale thickness ⳱ 兺sand 1ⳮ3 Thickness. 共4兲 cy between different reservoir fluids is because of small time-thick-
ness differences.
An extension of the Xu-White 共Xu and White, 1995兲 sand/shale The situation becomes more complicated for models with non-
model was used to convert porosity and Vshale values to VP, VS, and symmetric shale casing 共acoustic impedance is different between the
densities as input to reservoir models to compute synthetic seismo- shale above and below the reservoir兲. The spectral response is com-
grams. plicated by the nonsymmetric interference effect of wavelets at the
Two types of displays were used to examine the spectral-decom- top and bottom of the reservoir, in addition to the time-thickness
changes. Figure 5c and d shows the peak frequency versus gross res-
position response of reservoir fluids: peak frequency versus gross
ervoir thickness for the 15°-equivalent and 40°-equivalent models.
reservoir thickness and spectral ratios from hydrocarbon models,
Two regimes can be distinguished: for thin sand, the peak frequency
and the brine model at representative sand thicknesses. The former of the hydrocarbon sand is higher than the brine sand; for thick sand,
provides an abstract illustration of the frequency response of the syn- the peak frequency of the hydrocarbon sand is lower than the brine
thetic to the reservoir fluid changes. The latter shows the amplitude sand. In comparison with near angle, the maximum peak-frequency
contrast between different fluid-filled reservoirs and highlights the separation at far angle increases by ⬃50% for a thin sand regime and
frequency range over which the largest amplitude contrast may oc- ⬃100% for thick sand. A detailed explanation of the phenomenon is
cur. provided in a later section using the convolution model.
The consequence of peak-frequency shifts because of different
reservoir fluid fills is demonstrated through spectral-ratio plots in
Figure 6. The left column of Figure 6 共Figure 6a and c兲 shows results
for a 5-m sand 共thin sand兲 model. The right column 共Figure 6b and d兲
a) c) shows results for a 30-m sand 共thick sand兲 model. For clarity, three
a) b)
b) d)
c) d)
共instead of five兲 fluid-fill scenarios were plotted: dry gas, light oil, better separation between the oil-leg 共bright兲 and brine-leg 共dim/
and brine. Figure 6a shows interval-averaged amplitude spectra for blue兲 amplitudes. The 25-Hz spectral-decomposition map 共Figure
5-m gas sand, oil sand, and brine sand models. Figure 6c shows the 8c兲 has a very similar amplitude pattern to the input full-band seis-
spectral ratio versus frequency. The peak-frequency shift toward mics 共Figure 8a兲 because the dominant frequency of the full-band
higher values, as brine is replaced by hydrocarbon, causes a mono- seismic data is about 25 Hz. The high-frequency 共37-Hz兲 spectral-
Downloaded 01/21/15 to 128.120.194.195. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
tonic increase of spectral ratios with frequency between hydrocar- decomposition map 共Figure 8d兲 shows that high-amplitude patterns
bon and brine scenarios. We expect that hydrocarbon sand is better bleed across the oil-water contact 共upper-left area兲. The change of
illuminated at higher frequencies. For example, at 50 Hz, the hydro- high-amplitude patterns inside the white polygon 共the reservoir兲 is
carbon-sand and wet-sand contrast is more than 30% higher than at caused primarily by the variation in the thickness of the reservoir in-
30 Hz, the Ricker-wavelet frequency used to generate synthetic terval and net-to-gross sand volume fraction. Note a dim area inside
seismograms. the reservoir 共upper region inside the white polygon兲. This is be-
For thick sand 共Figure 6b and d兲, as brine is replaced by hydrocar- cause of the interference effect of an overlying reservoir that was not
bon, the peak frequency of the spectrum shifts to lower values. This investigated in this study.
peak-frequency shift causes a low-frequency peak in the spectral ra- Figure 8e and f further demonstrates the difference of the seismic
tio between hydrocarbon sand and wet sand 共Figure 6d兲. As a conse- stack response in the spectral domain between the oil leg and brine
quence, the hydrocarbon sand would be better illuminated at fre- leg. Figure 8e shows five rectangular regions over which average in-
quencies near this low-frequency peak. The contrast between gas terval spectra in Figure 8f were calculated. Three regions are in the
sand and wet sand is more than 40% higher at 16 Hz than at 30 Hz oil leg, with corresponding spectra black. Two regions are in the
共Ricker-wavelet frequency兲. For oil sand and wet sand, the contrast brine leg with corresponding spectra red. Two effects are clear from
is about 24% higher at 16 Hz than at 30 Hz. brine-leg spectra to oil-leg spectra: amplitude brightening 共higher
We can explain these results in the spectral domain invoking the
peak amplitude兲 and peak frequency shift to lower values.
convolution approach. With the convolution model, the amplitude
spectrum of the synthetic seismogram is the product of the reflectivi-
ty spectrum with the wavelet spectrum: a) b) c)
Time domain: S共t兲 ⳱ RC共t兲 丢 Wavelet共t兲 共5兲
scenario, and the right trace is for the brine scenario. Three horizon-
tal lines indicate the top of the reservoir 共black兲, the base of the oil
reservoir 共green兲, and the base of the reservoir for the brine-fill sce-
nario 共blue兲. There is a noticeable upward time shift in the reservoir
base when oil is replaced by brine because of faster velocities in the
brine-filled reservoir. Accordingly, the frequency content of the
brine scenario is higher, as shown in Figure 9c. Plotted in Figure 9c
are Fourier spectra for two synthetic traces in Figure 9b and the
Ricker-wavelet spectrum 共black curve兲. Notice the similarity be-
tween spectra for oil and brine scenarios in Figure 9c and Figure 8f:
a) b) b)
c) d)
c)
e) f)
Peak amplitude reduction and peak frequency shift toward higher There are some differences in details partially resulting from an im-
frequency. Thus, the spectral-response modeling at the control well perfect match of reservoir properties between the simulation and
共Figure 9c兲 explains the main features of the spectral-decomposition field seismic data sets.
response of the field seismics 共Figure 8f兲. The above modeling studies suggest that an analytical convolu-
A more elaborate modeling approach was done by stochastically tion approach in the Fourier domain potentially could serve as a
Downloaded 01/21/15 to 128.120.194.195. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
varying the reservoir properties at the control well, based on infor- quick evaluation tool for examining the spectral-decomposition re-
mation obtained from other wells drilled into this reservoir and seis- sponse to reservoir fluid. The Fourier amplitude spectrum for a re-
mic isochrons 共for thickness variation兲. Two spectral attributes were flectivity series RCi共ti兲 can be represented by
冑兺
extracted from the spectral decomposition of synthetic seismic trac-
N N
es and field seismic data for comparison. These are peak amplitudes
and peak frequencies computed from averaged interval spectra over A共 兲 ⳱
i⳱1
RC2i Ⳮ 兺
i⳱1,j⳱1,i⫽j
RCiRC j cos共 ⌬tij兲
the reservoir interval. Results are plotted in Figure 10. Figure 10a
and b shows results from field seismic data. Figure 10c and d shows ⫻ WRicker共 兲, 共7兲
results from modeling. The left column is for the brine scenario, and
the right column is for the oil scenario. One polygon was drawn on where RCi is the reflection coefficient at time ti, ⌬tij ⳱ t j–ti is the
the oil-scenario field seismic data, and another was drawn on the time difference, ⳱ 2 f is the frequency, and WRicker is the Ricker
brine scenario to highlight the distribution of peak amplitudes and spectrum. Figure 10e and f shows spectra and the spectral ratio com-
peak frequencies. The same polygons were overlaid on the peak-am- puted from this analytical expression for the reflectivity series at the
plitude/peak-frequency crossplots from synthetic-modeling results. control well 共Figure 2兲 for the oil and brine scenarios. With oil sub-
Comparison of Figure 10c and 10b-d shows that spectral-decom- stituted to brine, the peak amplitude decreases as peak frequency in-
position attributes 共peak amplitude and peak frequency兲 from syn- creases. The spectral ratio shows that the amplitude contrast be-
thetic modeling reproduce the overall patterns observed from the tween the oil and brine scenarios is largest 共⬎5兲 at about 13.5 Hz
far-angle stack seismic data. The average peak frequency for all syn- and is near one at about 35 Hz. This result explains the oil/brine con-
thetic models shifts to lower values when oil substitutes for brine trast of spectral-decomposition sections at 15 and 35 Hz, illustrated
共about 3 Hz兲. Consequently, the oil leg brightens in contrast to the in Figure 1b.
brine leg in the low-frequency spectral-decomposition section.
CONCLUSIONS
Synthetic seismic forward modeling explains the low-frequency
a) b) hydrocarbon anomaly observed from the spectral decomposition of
the far-angle stack seismic data from a deepwater West Africa reser-
voir. We identified four main controlling factors on the spectral-de-
composition response of a reservoir: thickness, stratigraphy 共i.e., re-
flectivity series兲, fluid type, and effective attenuation. For the reser-
voir in this example, peak frequencies are lower for the oil scenario
compared with the brine scenario, leading to a larger amplitude con-
trast between the oil leg and brine leg at low frequencies. This spec-
c) d) tral-decomposition response is consistent with results of stochastic
simulations and analytical Fourier-domain representation. Our
workflow could be used to highlight and analyze the optimal fre-
quency band at which the fluid effect shows the largest spectral-de-
composition response.
Because variations in reservoir properties 共sand-shale thickness,
porosity, net-to-gross, etc.兲 collectively affect the spectral response,
e) f) resulting in ambiguities/overlaps in spectral attributes between oil
and brine scenarios, detailed modeling is needed for each reservoir
to interpret spectrally decomposed seismic data correctly.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are thankful for ExxonMobil management’s support for the
research and approval for the publication and data release. Discus-
sions with many ExxonMobil geoscientists greatly benefited this
work, including Jie Zhang, Ramesh Neelamani, Dominique Gillard,
Michael Payne, and Wenjie Dong. Bob Keys provided critical re-
Figure 10. Crossplots of peak amplitude and peak frequency from views to the write-up that predated this paper. We are grateful to
spectral decomposition of the 共a, b兲 field seismics and 共c, d兲 synthet- Ellen Clark for arranging reviews of this paper. Dengliang Gao’s and
ics. The left column is for the brine scenario and the right column is
for the oil scenario. 共e兲 Analytical Fourier spectra of the oil scenario Brian P. Wallick’s detailed reviews and comments greatly improved
共green兲 and brine scenario 共blue兲 at the control well. 共f兲 Spectral ratio the manuscript. We thank a third anonymous reviewer for comments
of oil/brine. and John Castagna for many beneficial discussions on this topic.
C30 Chen et al.
REFERENCES Gratwick, D., and C. Finn, 2004, Seismic gather modeling and far-offset
well-ties — West Africa study: 74th Annual International Meeting, SEG,
Expanded Abstracts, 244–247.
Burnett, M. D., J. P. Castagna, E. Méndez-Hernández, G. Z. Rodríguez, L. F. ——–, 2005, What’s important in making far-stack well-to-seismic ties in
García, J. T. M. Vázquez, M. T. Avilés, and R. V. Villaseñor, 2003, Appli- West Africa?: The Leading Edge, 24, 739–745.
cation of spectral decomposition to gas basins in Mexico: The Leading Partyka, G., J. Gridley, and J. Lopez, 1999, Interpretational applications of
Edge, 22, 1130–1134.
Downloaded 01/21/15 to 128.120.194.195. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
Castagna, J. P., S. Sun, and R. W. Siegfried, 2003, Instantaneous spectral spectral decomposition in reservoir characterization: The Leading Edge,
analysis: Detection of low-frequency shadows associated with hydrocar- 18, 353–360.
bons: The Leading Edge, 22, 120–127. Sinha, S. K., P. S. Routh, P. D. Anno, and J. P. Castagna, 2003, Time-frequen-
Chakraborty, A., and D. Okaya, 1995, Frequency-time decomposition of cy attribute of seismic data using continuous wavelet transform: 73rd An-
seismic data using wavelet-based methods: Geophysics, 60, 1906–1916. nual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1481–1484.
Dilay, A., and J. Eastwood, 1995, Spectral analysis applied to seismic moni- Xu, S., and R. E. White, 1995, A new velocity model for clay-sand mixtures:
toring of thermal recovering: The Leading Edge, 14, 1117–1122. Geophysical Prospecting, 43, 91–118.