Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agenda
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS
2
1 2 3 4
Company Background
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS
4
Originally ‘Frontier Chief Optometrist Division was renamed Created first low-cost, JJVC gains and
Contact Lenses’ from develops new to ‘Vistakon’. daily disposable lens. maintains leadership
Buffalo, New York. material, Etafilcon, Developed automated Expanded globally to in the contact lens
Later moved to that allowed production system, Brazil, Japan, Singapore market.
Jacksonville, Florida production of soft leading to the creation and UK. Changed name
lenses. of the Acuvue brand. to JJVC.
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
Company Background
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS
5
Europe, Middle East and Africa
US and Canada 21% of revenue
22% volume
38% of revenue Limerick, Ireland
32% volume Production
EVC – London, UK
DC
HDC - Tokyo
DC
Jacksonville, FL Japan
Production + DC 21% of revenue
Key Insights 26% volume
$3Bn Business
4Bn Lenses Asia Pacific
22.000 SKUs
15% of revenue
LATAM 16% of volume
3% of revenue
1% of volume
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
6
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
Motivation
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS
7
Market Context
Contact lens global leader by market share but faces
competition from other large companies and disruptive
entrants.
Forecast Accuracy
Wants to explore the potential of
demand sensing as a means to
improve forecast accuracy
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
Objective Scope
Analyze the current J&J Vision Care forecasting process and propose suggestions for Region
improvement, paying special attention to Demand Sensing approaches. Continental United States
Production Facility
Jacksonville, FL
Brand
Acuvue
Jacksonville, FL
Production + DC Brand Family
1-Day Moist (1DM)
1-Day Moist for Astigmatism (1DM-A)
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
2 Methodology
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
Overview
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS
10
Tasks Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Phase I
Discovery
Phase II
Diagnosis
Capstone Write-up
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
Discovery
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS
11
Discovery
Site Visit
03 Jacksonville, FL
03 Production Facility
Distribution Center
S&OP Interviews
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
Diagnosis
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS
12
1 2 3
Demand Forecasting Forecast
Characterization Process Mapping Accuracy Analysis
Pareto Analysis Cycle Time Pareto Breakdown
Time Series Framework Comparison with
Distribution Data Inputs Alternative
Statistics Forecasts Forecasts
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
Latency Reduction
Reduce cycle time between 01
forecasts to take advantage of
latest demand information updates.
Measuring the Impact of
03 Demand Shaping Actions
Record and measure the impact of
demand shaping events such as
promotions, price changes, product
Downstream Data launches and forward-buy
Integration 02 arrangements.
Include downstream supply
chain data, such as POS data,
in the demand forecasting
model.
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
3 Findings
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
Characterization of Demand
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS
15
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
Characterization of Demand
Shipments Time Series by Quarters
16
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
Characterization of Demand
Pareto Curves
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
% of Total SKUs % of Total SKUs
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
% of Total SKUs % of Total SKUs
17
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
Characterization of Demand
Mean Shipments vs Coefficient of Variation for each Pareto segment
18
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
20
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
21
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
1-Month Cycle
2 weeks
3
Input Shipments Data Executive S&OP
1 2
2.2
1.1 JDA 1.2 Regional 2.1 SKU
Process Production
Software S&OP Breakdown
Planning
Latency Reduction
Reduce cycle time between 01
forecasts to take advantage of
latest demand information updates.
Measuring the Impact of
03 Demand Shaping Actions
Record and measure the impact of
demand shaping events such as
promotions, price changes, product
Downstream Data launches and forward-buy
Integration 02 arrangements.
Include downstream supply
chain data, such as POS data,
in the demand forecasting
model.
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
01 Latency Reduction
1-Month Cycle
1 week 1 week
3
Shipments Shipments
Input Data Data
Executive S&OP
1 2 1 2
1.2 2.2 1.2
1.1 JDA 2.1 SKU 1.1 JDA 2.1 SKU 2.2 Product
Process Software
Regional
Breakdown
Production
Software
Regional
Breakdown Planning
S&OP Planning S&OP
2 weeks
3
Input Shipments Data Downstream Data Executive S&OP
1 2
2.2
1.2 Regional 2.1 SKU
Process 1.1 DS Model Production
S&OP Breakdown
Planning
2 weeks
3
Demand Shaping
Input Shipments Data Executive S&OP
Data
1 2
2.2
1.2 Regional 2.1 SKU
Process 1.1 DS Model Production
S&OP Breakdown
Planning
— Cost-benefit tradeoff
— Cost-benefit tradeoff
— Cost-benefit tradeoff — Systems integration
— Data structuring
Challenges — Cross-functional — Data access
coordination — No guaranteed benefit in
— No guaranteed benefit in accuracy
accuracy
— Simplest solution
— Greater accuracy potential
— Fastest to Implement
Opportunities — Real time updates
— Guaranteed improvement in
— More responsive to change
accuracy
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
4 Conclusions
MIT Supply Chain Management Program Evan Humphrey | Federico Laiño
Takeaways
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS
29
Future Work
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS
30
Evan Humphrey
Bachelor of Science
Biotechnology
Indiana University
Federico Laiño
Bachelor of Science
Industrial Engineering
Buenos Aires Institute of Technology
31