Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region V
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF CAMARINES SUR

CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

SCHOOLS
INDICATORS 1 ARTIFACTS DON
SIRUMA NHS FUNDADO NHS TANDOC NHS VITO NHS
SERVILLANO
1.Enrolment data type of Learners 3 3 3 2 3
2. Assessment tools and datables of
assessment result.
a.Diagnostic Tools

b.MFAT (SPED)

c.ECD Checklist 2 3 3 3 1

d.Reading Inventory
e.Numeracy

f.language Mapping
3.Report on the analysis of
assessment result:
NAT (if applicable)

Teacher-made test (with TOS) 3 3 3 2 2

Other summative Assessment result

(Least learned skills and performance

gaps
4. Availability of CGs,TGs,LMs,etc.for 3
other types of Learners.

A.Students with special needs ( If applicable)

3 3 2 1
b. Ips, Muslim learners (If applicable)
c.ALS modules (if applicable)
d.Modules for ADMS (Open High Schools,
MISOSA Home Schooling (If applicable)
5.Supervisory Plan, Instructional Supervision 3 3 1 1
Report 1
6.Action Plans, accomplishment,
documentation report on implementation of
programs and projects that address learners 1 3 2 2 1
needs( sunmitted
7.Intervation &receive
Action by the
plans,M&E
district/SDO
reports,accomplishment,documentation
reports on implementation of iniated PAPs 1 2 2 2 1
8.Documentation report of LAC Session 1 2 1 1 1
9.Intervention Reports (eg. SIM, Action
research,best practice. 1 2 3 2 2
10.School rewards/awards program 1 2 1 3 2
11.Instructional monitoring report/anecdotal
report/other proff of monitoring.
1 2 3 3 2
12. Result of academic
contest,awards,certificate of commendation
receive.
1 2 2 3 3
13.School paper,website/PLNs and other
means to showcase best practices. 1 3 3 2 2
14.Report of participation of students and
teachers in activities outside the school.
1 3 3 2 2
15.Documentations that the school has been
benchmarked eg.log Book,Letter of
Appreciation,etc.
1 0 0 0 3

INDICATORS 2 ARTIFACTS
1. Documentation report/certificates of
participation in workshops to localize the
curriculum.
1 2 3 1 3
2.Local heritage metrix 3 2 3 3 1
3.Contexualized curriculum matrix per
learning area
4.Inventory of localized and indergenized
teaching and learning materials.
5.organized school level learning resources
evaluations 1 1 3 0 2
6.Evaluation tools for localized learning
resources 1 2 3 3 2
7.record of utilization downloaded materials
from LR portal 1 3 1 1 3
8.Record of quality assured locally-developed
LRs utilized at the school, district,division
level
1 2 2 1 3
9.Functional schools
library/LRC/mobile/library corner/classroom
mini libraries.
1 3 2 1 3
10. Monitoring report of implementation of
the localized curricilum. 1 2 1 2 3
11.Records locally-developed LRs published
in the LR portal/printed,published or widely-
circulated.

1 3 3 1 3
12.Report/record of community
engagement/program/extension
services/immersion in communities.
1 3 3 0 3

INDICATTOR 3 ARTIFACTS
1. Composition of a school project team with
terms of reference. 2 2 2 3 1
2.learning resource needs assessment 2 3 2 2 3
3.summary of assessment result. 3 1 3 2 3
4. Presence of developed/redeveloped
learning resources with evidences of
utiization
1 2 3 1 3
5. Evidences of remedial/enhancement
instruction or catch up mechanism. 2 2 2 2 3
6.Evaluation and validation result for learning
resources. 1 3 2 1 3
7.Project implementation report showing
attaintment of expected outputs. 1 1 1 2 3
8.Certification that innovations were
adopted/utilized in school,family and
community.
1 2 1 0 1

INDICATORS 4 ARTIFACTS 3
 INDICATORS 4 ARTIFACTS 3
1. Doocumentation of school assemblies and
meetings. 3 1 2 2 2
2. state of the school address. 3 1 1 1 3
3.Update of School reports. 3 3 1 3 3
4. All Sf 9(report Cards are signed by the
parents. 3 3 3 3 3
5. learning profile with anecdotal record. 3 3 1 3 1
6.formulated school policy guidelines on
learner developmental activities. 3 2 3 3 3
7.Presented/communication SRCs to
stakeholders. 1 2 1 2 3
8.LGU/community resolution/ordinance
supporting the activities for the total
development of learners.
2 0 2 1 3
9.Manual/handbook on learnimng and
monitoring system is available. 1 2 2 1 3

INDICATOR 5 ARTIFACTS
1.Creation of assessment review team with
terms of reference 3 1 2 2 2
2.Evidence of reviewed assessment tools/on
written work such as sample pupils/students
portfolio with specific rubrics,sample pupils
students journals with rubrics and other
written work like reaction or reflection
paper,students researches etc.

3 1 2 2 2
3.Evidence of reviewed assessment tools on
performance task such as culminating
activities,simulations and actual performance
of task/s.
3 1 2 2 2
4. Evidence of reviewed assessment tool/s on
quarterly examination with TOS. 3 3 1 2 3
5.Documentation of the review of
assessment tools (FGD,meeting)conducted by
school community and stakeholders.

1 2 1 1 3
6.Evidences of modifications of assessment
tools based on the suggestions gathered from
the FGD.
1 3 1 1 2
7.Assessment result are conveyed to
stakeholders through assemblies and other
appropriate online or offline strategies.

1 0 2 2 2
8.Documents on the learning
programs/activities developed as a result o
assessment.
1 1 1 2 2

INDICATORS 6a Artifacts
1.School advocacy program on child
protection related concerns. 3 3 3 3 2
2.WINs 1 star 0 0 2.3 0 2
3.be best implemented division level 0 0 0 0 3
4.wins 2 star 1 0 2.5 3
5.Statement of support from stakeholders in
relation to schools advocacy program. 1 0 3 0 3
6. be best implementer-Regional Level 1 1 0 0 3
7.Wins 3 star 1 3 3 0
8.Outstanding CFSS rating. 1 1 0 0
9. Be implementer national level. 1 0 0 0 3

INDICATOR 6b Artifacts
1. Documents on the implementetation of
activities related to increasing stakeholders
awareness and commitments to child
protection.
2 2 2 3 3
2. availability of strategic intervention
materials sim 1 1 1 2 2
SLAC documentation on designing learner
centered LMs 1 1 1 3 3
4.Student handbook. 1 1 3 2 3

INDICATORS 7A ARTIFACTS
1. workbooks,activity sheets,modules 3 2 2 3 2
2. documentation of students led learning
activities. 1 1 2 3 3
3.approved students iniated activities. 3 1 2 2
4.students initiated community programs. 1 1 1 1 2
5.community sponsored programs.activities
(Picto-narrative) 1 0 1 1 3
6. Benchmaking of best practices in line with
developing self-directed learners evident in
the home and community.
1 0 1 1 3

INDICATORS 7b artifacts
1.Portfolio of self directed learning programs.
2 1 1 2 3
2.Parents engagement in the learning
activities of learners. 1 1 1 1 2
3.Proof of instituitional of self-directed
learning programs in school. 1 1 1 1 2
MELECIO
E. ANAGAO MELECIO POSTARDO E. ANAGAO E. ANAGAO POSTARDO
BAGACAY GREGORIO
NHS OCAMPO
3
3

2 2.5
3 2.5

3 3

3 3

3 2

3 2
2 3

3 2
3 3

3 2
3 3

3 2

3 3

1 0

0 2
1 3

1 3

1 3

3 3

3 3
2 3

1 3

1 3

3 2

1 2
3 3
3 3

3 3

3 3

3 3

3 3

3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3

3 3
3 2

1 3

3 2

3 2

3 0

3 2

2 2
2 3

3 3

2 2

2 2

3 3

3 2

2 3
3 3
2 3
3 0

3 3
3 0
3 0
2 3
0

3 3

2 3

2 3
3 3

2 3

2 3
3 3
3 3

3 0

3 0

3 3

3 3
 3 3
MELECIO MELECIO
POSTARDO POSTARDO
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region V
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF CAMARINES SUR

CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

SCHOOLS
INDICATORS 1 ARTIFACTS
TIERA NEVADA NHS BUENAVISTA NHS

1.Enrolment data type of Learners

2 3

2. Assessment tools and datables of assessment

result.
a.Diagnostic Tools

b.MFAT (SPED)

c.ECD Checklist 1 3

d.Reading Inventory

e.Numeracy

f.language Mapping

3.Report on the analysis of assessment result:

NAT (if applicable)

1 3
Teacher-made test (with TOS)
Other summative Assessment result
(Least learned skills and performance gaps
4. Availability of CGs,TGs,LMs,etc.for other types 2
of Learners.
A.Students with special needs ( If applicable)
b. Ips, Muslim learners (If applicable) 3
c.ALS modules (if applicable)
d.Modules for ADMS (Open High Schools, MISOSA
Home Schooling (If applicable)
5.Supervisory Plan, Instructional Supervision 2 3
Report
 6.Action Plans, accomplishment, documentation
report on implementation of programs and
projects that address learners needs( sunmitted
&receive by the district/SDO 3 2
7.Intervation Action plans,M&E
reports,accomplishment,documentation reports
on implementation of iniated PAPs 3 0
8.Documentation report of LAC Session 3 2
9.Intervention Reports (eg. SIM, Action
research,best practice. 3 2
10.School rewards/awards program 3 3
11.Instructional monitoring report/anecdotal
report/other proff of monitoring.
3 2
12. Result of academic contest,awards,certificate
of commendation receive.
3 3
13.School paper,website/PLNs and other means
to showcase best practices. 3 3
14.Report of participation of students and
teachers in activities outside the school. 3 3
15.Documentations that the school has been
benchmarked eg.log Book,Letter of
Appreciation,etc. 3 0

INDICATORS 2 ARTIFACTS
1. Documentation report/certificates of
participation in workshops to localize the
curriculum. 3 0
2.Local heritage metrix 1 3
3.Contexualized curriculum matrix per learning
area 2 3
4.Inventory of localized and indergenized teaching
and learning materials. 3 0
5.organized school level learning resources
evaluations 3 3
6.Evaluation tools for localized learning resources
2 3
7.record of utilization downloaded materials from
LR portal 0 3
8.Record of quality assured locally-developed LRs
utilized at the school, district,division level
3 0
9.Functional schools library/LRC/mobile/library
corner/classroom mini libraries.
3 3
10. Monitoring report of implementation of the
localized curricilum. 1 0
11.Records locally-developed LRs published in the
LR portal/printed,published or widely-circulated.
0 0
12.Report/record of community
engagement/program/extension
services/immersion in communities. 3 3
INDICATTOR 3 ARTIFACTS
1. Composition of a school project team with
terms of reference. 3 2
2.learning resource needs assessment 2 1
3.summary of assessment result. 2 3
4. Presence of developed/redeveloped learning
resources with evidences of utiization
3 0
5. Evidences of remedial/enhancement
instruction or catch up mechanism. 3 2
6.Evaluation and validation result for learning
resources. 0 0
7.Project implementation report showing
attaintment of expected outputs. 3 3
8.Certification that innovations were
adopted/utilized in school,family and community.
3 0

INDICATORS 4 ARTIFACTS
1. Doocumentation of school assemblies and
meetings. 3 3
2. state of the school address. 3 3
3.Update of School reports. 3 3
4. All Sf 9(report Cards are signed by the parents.
3 3
5. learning profile with anecdotal record. 3 3
6.formulated school policy guidelines on learner
developmental activities. 3 3
7.Presented/communication SRCs to
stakeholders. 1 3
8.LGU/community resolution/ordinance
supporting the activities for the total development
of learners.
3 3
9.Manual/handbook on learnimng and monitoring
system is available. 3 3

INDICATOR 5 ARTIFACTS
1.Creation of assessment review team with terms
of reference 3 2
2.Evidence of reviewed assessment tools/on
written work such as sample pupils/students
portfolio with specific rubrics,sample pupils
students journals with rubrics and other written
work like reaction or reflection paper,students
researches etc.

3 2
3.Evidence of reviewed assessment tools on
performance task such as culminating
activities,simulations and actual performance of
task/s.
3 2
4. Evidence of reviewed assessment tool/s on
quarterly examination with TOS. 3 3
5.Documentation of the review of assessment tools
(FGD,meeting)conducted by school community
and stakeholders. 3 1
6.Evidences of modifications of assessment tools
based on the suggestions gathered from the FGD.
0 1
7.Assessment result are conveyed to stakeholders
through assemblies and other appropriate online
or offline strategies. 3 3
8.Documents on the learning programs/activities
developed as a result o assessment.
0 3

INDICATORS 6a Artifacts
1.School advocacy program on child protection
related concerns. 3 3
2.WINs 1 star 3 2
3.be best implemented division level 0 2
4.wins 2 star 3 0
5.Statement of support from stakeholders in
relation to schools advocacy program. 3 3
6. be best implementer-Regional Level 0 0
7.Wins 3 star 3 3
8.Outstanding CFSS rating. 0 0
9. Be implementer national level. 0 0

INDICATOR 6b Artifacts
1. Documents on the implementetation of
activities related to increasing stakeholders
awareness and commitments to child protection.
3 3
2. availability of strategic intervention materials
sim 2 3
SLAC documentation on designing learner
centered LMs 3 3
4.Student handbook. 0 3

INDICATORS 7A ARTIFACTS 3
1. workbooks,activity sheets,modules 3 2
2. documentation of students led learning
activities. 3 3
3.approved students iniated activities. 3 3
4.students initiated community programs. 3 3
5.community sponsored programs.activities
(Picto-narrative) 3 3
6. Benchmaking of best practices in line with
developing self-directed learners evident in the
home and community. 3 0
INDICATORS 7b artifacts
1.Portfolio of self directed learning programs.
3 2
2.Parents engagement in the learning activities of
learners. 3 3
3.Proof of instituitional of self-directed learning
programs in school. 3 3

MELECIO POSTRADO MELECIO POSTRADO

 SCHOOLS
VIVENCIO 0BIAS
TAMBAN NHS SAGRADA NHS NATO NHS SANGAY SE HS
NHS

3 3 3 3
3

2.5 2.75 2 2 3

3 3 2 3 3

2 3 2 2 0

3 3
3 0 3
3 2 3 2 2

3 3 3 2 3
3 3 3 2 3

3 3 3 3 3
2 3 3 2 3

2 2 3 2 0

3 3 3 2 3

3 3 3 3 2

3 2 3 2 2

2 3 0 3 2

2 3 1 0 3
3 2 3 3 2

2 3 2 3 3

2 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 2

3 2 3 0 3

2 3 3 0 2

3 3 3 0 3

2 2 3 3 3

3 3 2 0

2 2 3 0 0

3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3
3 3 0 3 3
3 3 3 3 3

2 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 32 2

3 3 3 0 3

3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 2
2 3 3 2 2

3 3 3 2 3
2 2 3 1 2

3 3 3 3 3

2 3 3 1 2

3 3 3 0 2

2 3 3 0 0

2 3 3 3 3

3 2 3 3

3 3 3 0 3
2 3 3 3 3

3 3 2 3 2

3 3 2 0 2

3 3 3 2 3

2 3 3 3 2

3 3 3 3 3
0 1 3 3 x
3 2 0 x
0 2 3 3 x

3 2 3 3 3
1 0 0 x
0 3 0 3 x
1 2 0 x
0 0 0 x

3 2 3 0 3

3 3 2 2 3

3 2 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 0

3
2 3 3 3 3

3 3 2 2 3
2 3 3 2 3
3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

2 3 0 3 2
 2 2 3 2 3

3 3 3 2 3

2 1 3 0 0

MELECIO MELECIO AGAPITO

POSTRADO POSTRADO MILA PEÑA TOGÑI AGAPITO TOGÑI
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region V
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF CAMARINES SUR

CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTI

SCHOOLS
INDICATORS 1 ARTIFACTS
SAN RAFAEL NHS CABALINADAN HS

1.Enrolment data type of Learners

3 3

2. Assessment tools and datables of assessment

result.
a.Diagnostic Tools

b.MFAT (SPED)

c.ECD Checklist 3 2

d.Reading Inventory

e.Numeracy

f.language Mapping

3.Report on the analysis of assessment result:

NAT (if applicable)

3 3
Teacher-made test (with TOS)
Other summative Assessment result
(Least learned skills and performance gaps
4. Availability of CGs,TGs,LMs,etc.for other types 3
of Learners.
A.Students with special needs ( If applicable)
b. Ips, Muslim learners (If applicable) 3
c.ALS modules (if applicable)
d.Modules for ADMS (Open High Schools, MISOSA
Home Schooling (If applicable)
5.Supervisory Plan, Instructional Supervision 3 3
Report
 6.Action Plans, accomplishment, documentation
report on implementation of programs and
projects that address learners needs( sunmitted
&receive by the district/SDO 3 2
7.Intervation Action plans,M&E
reports,accomplishment,documentation reports
on implementation of iniated PAPs 3 2
8.Documentation report of LAC Session 3 3
9.Intervention Reports (eg. SIM, Action
research,best practice. 3 3
10.School rewards/awards program 3 2
11.Instructional monitoring report/anecdotal
report/other proff of monitoring.
3 2
12. Result of academic contest,awards,certificate
of commendation receive.
3 3
13.School paper,website/PLNs and other means
to showcase best practices. 3 3
14.Report of participation of students and
teachers in activities outside the school. 3 2
15.Documentations that the school has been
benchmarked eg.log Book,Letter of
Appreciation,etc. 3 2

INDICATORS 2 ARTIFACTS
1. Documentation report/certificates of
participation in workshops to localize the
curriculum. 3 0
2.Local heritage metrix 3 3
3.Contexualized curriculum matrix per learning
area 3 2
4.Inventory of localized and indergenized teaching
and learning materials. 3 2
5.organized school level learning resources
evaluations 3 3
6.Evaluation tools for localized learning resources
3 3
7.record of utilization downloaded materials from
LR portal 3 0
8.Record of quality assured locally-developed LRs
utilized at the school, district,division level
3 0
9.Functional schools library/LRC/mobile/library
corner/classroom mini libraries.
3 3
10. Monitoring report of implementation of the
localized curricilum. 2 1
11.Records locally-developed LRs published in the
LR portal/printed,published or widely-circulated.
2 2
12.Report/record of community
engagement/program/extension
services/immersion in communities. 3 2
 INDICATTOR 3 ARTIFACTS
1. Composition of a school project team with
terms of reference. 3 3
2.learning resource needs assessment 3 3
3.summary of assessment result. 3 3
4. Presence of developed/redeveloped learning
resources with evidences of utiization
3 0
5. Evidences of remedial/enhancement
instruction or catch up mechanism. 3 2
6.Evaluation and validation result for learning
resources. 3 3
7.Project implementation report showing
attaintment of expected outputs. 3 3
8.Certification that innovations were
adopted/utilized in school,family and community.
3 2

INDICATORS 4 ARTIFACTS
1. Doocumentation of school assemblies and
meetings. 3 3
2. state of the school address. 3 3
3.Update of School reports. 3 3
4. All Sf 9(report Cards are signed by the parents.
3 3
5. learning profile with anecdotal record. 3 2
6.formulated school policy guidelines on learner
developmental activities. 3 3
7.Presented/communication SRCs to
stakeholders. 3 2
8.LGU/community resolution/ordinance
supporting the activities for the total development
of learners.
3 2
9.Manual/handbook on learnimng and monitoring
system is available. 3 2

INDICATOR 5 ARTIFACTS
1.Creation of assessment review team with terms
of reference 3 3
2.Evidence of reviewed assessment tools/on
written work such as sample pupils/students
portfolio with specific rubrics,sample pupils
students journals with rubrics and other written
work like reaction or reflection paper,students
researches etc.

3 3
3.Evidence of reviewed assessment tools on
performance task such as culminating
activities,simulations and actual performance of
task/s.
3 3
4. Evidence of reviewed assessment tool/s on
quarterly examination with TOS. 3 3
5.Documentation of the review of assessment tools
(FGD,meeting)conducted by school community
and stakeholders. 3 3
6.Evidences of modifications of assessment tools
based on the suggestions gathered from the FGD.
3 3
7.Assessment result are conveyed to stakeholders
through assemblies and other appropriate online
or offline strategies. 3 3
8.Documents on the learning programs/activities
developed as a result o assessment.
3 2

INDICATORS 6a Artifacts
1.School advocacy program on child protection
related concerns. 3 2
2.WINs 1 star 2 X
3.be best implemented division level 2 X
4.wins 2 star 3 X
5.Statement of support from stakeholders in
relation to schools advocacy program. 3 2
6. be best implementer-Regional Level 2 X
7.Wins 3 star X
8.Outstanding CFSS rating. X
9. Be implementer national level. X

INDICATOR 6b Artifacts
1. Documents on the implementetation of
activities related to increasing stakeholders
awareness and commitments to child protection.
3 2
2. availability of strategic intervention materials
sim 2 3
SLAC documentation on designing learner
centered LMs 3 3
4.Student handbook. 2 3

INDICATORS 7A ARTIFACTS
1. workbooks,activity sheets,modules 3 3
2. documentation of students led learning
activities. 3 2
3.approved students iniated activities. 3 2
4.students initiated community programs. 3 2
5.community sponsored programs.activities
(Picto-narrative) 3 3
6. Benchmaking of best practices in line with
developing self-directed learners evident in the
home and community. 3 2
 INDICATORS 7b artifacts
1.Portfolio of self directed learning programs.
3 2
2.Parents engagement in the learning activities of
learners. 3 2
3.Proof of instituitional of self-directed learning
programs in school. 3 2

MILA P. PEÑA MILA P. PEÑA

Prepared by:

MILA P. PEÑA
Public Schools District Supervisor
blic of the Philippines
ment of Education
Region V
ION OFFICE OF CAMARINES SUR

M AND INSTRUCTION
SCHOOLS
PINAGLABANAN BALATON
BUENAVISTA NHS DAHAT NVHS SAN JOSE NHS
HS NHS

3 3 3 3
3

2 3 3 2 3

3 3 3 2 3

2 3 3 3 3

3 3
3 1 3
3 3 3 2 3

3 3 3 2 3
3 3 3 2 3

3 3 3 2 3
3 3 3 2 3

3 3 3 2 3

3 1 3 2 3

3 3 3 2 3

2 3 3 2 3

2 2 3 0 3

3 3 3 0 3
2 3 3 3 3

3 3 2 3 3

0 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 2 3

0 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

0 3 3 1 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

1 3 3 1 3

3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 0 3

3 3 3 3 3

0 3 3 0 3

3 2 3 3 3
3 2 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3

3 2 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 2 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 2
3 3 3 2 3

3 3 3 0 3

3 3 3 0 3

3 3 3 1 3

3 3 3 2 3

3 3 3 0 3
3 3 3 0 3
0 0 0 0 2
3 3 3 0 3

3 3 3 1 3
0 0 0 0 3
3 0 3 0 3
0 3 3 0 3
0 0 X 0 3

3 3 3 2 3

1 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 2 3
3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 2 3
3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

1 3 3 0 3
 3 3 3 2 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 2 3

MILA P. PEÑA SYLVIA OBIAS SYLVIA OBIAS SYLVIA OBIAS MILA PEÑA