ISABELA STATE UNIVERSITY

City of Ilagan Campus

City of Ilagan 3300 Isabela Philippines

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

CRITERIA FOR JUDGING EFFICIENCY OF STUDENT TEACHERS

PROF. ED. 421- TEACHING INTERNSHIP

Name of Mentee: ___________________________ Name of Mentor: _________________________

Subject Taught: _____________________________ School: _________________________________
Year: ______________________________________ Date: __________________________________

Scale: 5- Outstanding 4- Very Satisfactory 3- Satisfactory 2- Poor 1- Need Improvement

5 4 3 2 1 Rating
I. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY (10%)
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerism that tends to disturb the students.
C. The teacher’s personality is strong enough to command respect and
attention.
D. The teacher shows dynamism and enthusiasm.
II. LESSON PLANNING (10%)
A. Lesson plan is well prepared.
B. There is congruence between:
1. Objectives and subject matter
2. Objectives and teaching procedure
3. Objectives and formative test
III. CONTENT (25%)
A. The teacher demonstrates in depth knowledge of the subject matter.
B. He/she is able to relate lessons to actual life situations.
C. Keeps abreast of new ideas and understanding in the field.
D. Give sufficient and concrete examples to create meaningful learning
experiences.
IV. TEACHING METHODS (25%)
A. Methods used were suited to the needs and capabilities of the students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her methods to the
student’s capabilities.
C. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching.
V. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT (15%)
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
1. Attendance
2. Assignment/Homework/Agreement
3. Practice Experiences
VI. QUESTIONING SKILLS (15%)
A. The teacher’s questioning skill stimulates discussion in different ways
such as:
ISUI-CEd-CJS- 013a
Effective: January 03, 2017
Revision: 0
 ISABELA STATE UNIVERSITY
City of Ilagan Campus
City of Ilagan 3300 Isabela Philippines

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

1. Probing of learner’s understanding

2. Helping students articulate their ideas and thinking process
3. Promote risk taking and problem solving
4. Facilitate factual recall
5. Encourage convergent and divergent thinking
6. Stimulate curiosity
7. Helps students to ask questions

SUMMARY RATING REMARKS

I. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY
II. LESSON PLANNING
III. CONTENT
IV. TEACHING METHODS
V. CLASSROOM MANGEMENT
VI. QUESTIONING SKILLS
TOTAL

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS:

__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________

Name and Signature of Evaluator

ISUI-CEd-CJS- 013a
Effective: January 03, 2017
Revision: 0