Ree oe a 26 BSES (SG aoe ona fads SS = Seses Tunabsy)_thete ranot-childken. Shel stho-passerocne boarded _a seen by the Petitioner. Br reule the EP Front he expleded resulting 40 the bus 4o fall hdc a \tavine. Seesequemth As a fesull of such -acident the | passengers actained physical tnurics chile tH. Tomboy died. “frainkifts fled a case against the bus liver 7 assail asserling the videhon of tHe comact of evrege | WON forkujous even} Can be used 25 2 defense mar No the exdosion of the 4ire camel be siete =5 A Sarhutous ever Furthermore there vas a clear lack | of diligerre om by the bus driver when tHe did not | sloue down despite repeated caution 22 Conbrved to speec! even though the road wes touch, it was windy ane! wet due 4o 4he rain. As such clue to the failure 4e_averhro- __ the presumption of neghgence, Webibs_is_nst_ Sree trom - any _tability. ates ara Scanned with CamScanner